SUPREME COURT of INDIA* Civil Appeals Nos

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

SUPREME COURT of INDIA* Civil Appeals Nos SUPREME COURT OF INDIA* Civil Appeals Nos. 887 and 909 of 1975$ (Decision dated 7-11-1975) In C.A. No. 887 of 1975 Smt. Indira Nehru Gandhi ..Appellant Vs. Shri Raj Narain ..Respondent In C.A. No. 909 of 1975 Shri Raj Narain ..Appellant Vs. Smt. Indira Nehru Gandhi ..Respondent SUMMARY OF THE CASE Smt.Indira Nehru Gandhi was elected to the House of the People from Rae Bareli Parliamentary Constituency in March, 1971. Her election was challenged by one of the rival candidates Shri Raj Narain, before the Allahabad High Court by an election petition. The High Court, by its judgment and order dated 12.6.1975, allowed the election petition and declared the election of Smt. Indira Nehru Gandhi as void. The High Court held that Smt. Gandhi had procured assistance of Shri Yashpal Kapoor, a Gazetted Officer of the Government of India, the District Magistrate and Superintendent of Police, Rae Bareli, the Executive Engineer, PWD, and the Engineer, Hydel Department, for her election campaign and had thus committed corrupt practices under Section 123 (7) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. Aggrieved by the order of the Allahabad High Court, Smt. Indira Nehru Gandhi filed the present appeal before the Supreme Court. A cross-appeal was also filed by Shri Raj Narain. During the pendency of these appeals, Parliament passed the Election Laws (Amendment) Act, 1975. By this Amendment Act, several provisions of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 were amended retrospectively. Further, Parliament also passed the Constitution (Thirty-ninth Amendment) Act, 1975. By this Amendment Act, a new Article 329-A was inserted into the Constitution to provide, inter alia, that the election to Parliament of a person, who holds office of Prime Minister or Speaker of the Lok Sabha at the time of such election or is appointed as Prime Minister or Speaker after such election, shall be called in question only before a specially prescribed authority [and not before the High Court under Article 329 (b) of the Constitution]. Furthermore, by the said Amendment Act, Parliament also validated the election of Smt. Indira Nehru Gandhi. The validity of the above mentioned two Amending Acts also became subject matter of the present appeals. One of the grounds of attack on the validity of these Acts was that many members of Parliament were subjected to preventive detention after the Proclamation of Emergency in June, 1975 and, therefore, these Acts had not been validly passed by Parliament in their absence. The Supreme Court, in the present appeals, upheld the validity of the Election Laws (Amendment) Act, 1975 and also the validity of the Constitution (Thirty-ninth Amendment) Act, 1975, except that part of the latter Act whereby Parliament had validated the election of Smt. Indira Nehru Gandhi. Applying the law, as amended retrospectively by the aforesaid Election Laws (Amendment) Act, 1975, the Supreme Court upheld the election of Smt. Indira Gandhi to the House of the People, allowing her appeal, and rejecting the cross–appeal of Shri Raj Narain. (A) Election Laws (Amendment) Act 40 of 1975), Pre. – Constitution (Thirty-ninth Amendment) Act (1975), Pre. – constitutional validity of – cannot be challenged on ground that a number of Members of Parliament were in detention –(Constitution of India, Arts. 85 and 122). Per Ray, C.J. : – The constitution of the House which passed the Constitution (Thirty-ninth Amendment) Act is not illegal on the ground that a number of members of Parliament of the two Houses were detained by executive order after 26 June, 1975. It has also to be stated that it is not open to challenge the orders of detention collaterally. The principle is that what is directly forbidden cannot be indirectly achieved. (Paras 69, 74, 75, 76, 82, 86, 87) Per Khanna, J : – The constitutional validity of the Constitution Amendment Act and the 1975 Act amending the Representation of the People Act cannot be assailed on the ground that some members of Parliament were prevented because of their detention from attending and participating in the proceedings of the respective Houses of Parliament. (Para 184) The contention that the sittings of the two Houses of Parliament in which the impugned Acts were passed were not valid essentially relates to the validity of the proceedings of the two Houses of Parliament. These are matters which are not justiciable and pertain to the internal domain of the two Houses. Of course, the courts can go into the question as to whether the measures passed by Parliament are constitutionally valid. The court cannot, however, go into the question as to whether the sittings of the Houses of Parliament were not constitutionally valid because some members of those Houses were prevented from attending and participating in the discussions in those Houses. (Para 180) The act of detaining a person is normally that of an outside agency and not that of the House of Parliament. It would certainly look anomalous if the act of an outside agency which might ultimately turn out to be not legal could affect the validity of the proceedings of the House of Parliament or could prevent that House from assembling and functioning. (Para 182) Per Mathew J. : – The detention of members of Parliament was by statutory authorities in the purported exercise of their statutory power. It would be strange if a statutory authority, by an order which turns out to be illegal, could prevent the Houses of Parliament from meeting as enjoined by Article 85. If a statutory authority passes an illegal Order of detention and thus prevents a member of Parliament for attending the House, how can the proceedings of Parliament become illegal for that reason ? It is the privilege of parliament to secure the attendance of persons illegally detained. But if the privilege is not exercised by parliament the proceedings of parliament would not become illegal for that reason. (Para 378) The President, in performing his constitutional function under Articles 352, 359 has not authorised the illegal detention of any person let alone any member of Parliament or unconstitutionally prevented the release from custody of any member. He has only discharged his constitutional functions. If this be so, it is difficult to hold that the session in which the amendments were passed was illegally convened. The challenge to the validity of the amendments on this score must be overruled. (Para 379) Per Beg, J. : – Constitutional validity of the impugned Acts cannot be challenged on the ground that as a number of members of Parliament belonging to the opposite parties were in detention, under the Preventive detention laws, which could not be questioned before Courts of law, because of the declaration of the emergency by the President, there was a procedural defect in making the impurgned enactments. Such an objection is directly covered by the terms of Article 122 which debars every Court from examining the propriety of proceedings ‘‘in Parliament’’. If any privileges of Members of Parliament were involved, it was open to them to have the question raised ‘‘in Parliament.’’ (Para 509) As regards the validity of the detentions of the Members of Parliament, that cannot be questioned automatically or on the bare statement by counsel that certain Members of Parliament are illegally detained with some ulterior object. The enforcement of fundamental rights is regulated by Articles 32 and 226 of the Constitution and the suspension of remedies under these articles is also governed by appropriate constitutional provisions. (Para 511) Per chandrachud. J. : – There is no merit in the contention that the constitutional amendment is bad because it was passed when some members of the Parliament were in detention. The legality of the detention orders cannot be canvassed collaterally. And from a practical point of view, the presence of 21 members of the Lok Sabha and 10 members of the Rajya Sabha who were in detention could not have made a difference to the passing of the Amendment. (Para 696) (B) Constitution of India. Art. 329-A (4) and (5) as inserted by Constitution (Thirty-ninth Amendment) Act 1975 – Validation of election – Constitutional Validity – (Pre and Arts. 14. 105 (3), 329 (b) and 368) – (Interpretation of Statutes) – (Representation of The People Act (1951), S. 116-A). Per Majority – (Khanna, Mathew and Chandrachud, JJ.) : – Clause (4) of Article 329-A as introduced by the Constitution 39th Amendment Act of 1975 is unconstitutional. (Paras 213, 345 and 682) Per Khanna, J. : – Clause (4) of Article 329-A is liable to be struck down on the ground that it violates the principle of free and fair elections which is an essential postulate of democracy and which in its turn is a part of the basic structure of the Constitution inasmuch as (1) it abolishes the forum without providing for another forum for going into the dispute relating to the validity of the election of the appellant and further prescribes that the said dispute shall not be governed by any election law and that the validity of the said election shall be absolute and not consequently be liable to be assailed, and (2) it extinguishes both the right and the remedy to challenge the validity of the aforesaid election. (Para 213) Per Mathew, J. : – Our Constitution, by Article 329 (b) visualizes the resolution of an election dispute on the basis of a petition presented to such authority and in such manner as the appropriate legislature may, by law, provide. The nature of the dispute raised in an election petition is such that it cannot be resolved except by judicial process, namely, by ascertaining the facts relating to the election and applying the preexisting law: when the amending body held that the election of the appellant was valid, it could not have done so except by ascertaining the facts by judicial process and by applying the law.
Recommended publications
  • 83 Calling Attention [RAJYA SABHA]
    83 Calling Attention [RAJYA SABHA] ma matter if 84 urgent puhln- importance [Shri Lokanaih Misra.] CALLING ATTENTION TO A MATTER OF URGENT PUBLIC IMPORTANCE of Delhi, he is the appropriate authority or the ACUTE FAMINE CONDITIONS Government of India is the appropriate PREVAILING IN ORISSA authority. SHRI R.K. KHADILKAR: I would like to SHRI BHUPESH GUPTA (West Bengal): give, with your permission, one clarification Sir, I beg to call the attention of the Minister of because the hon. Member, Mr. Misra, has Agriculture to the acute famine conditions raised it. As I have said, there was a question prevailing in Orissa and the reported starvation of a general nature and a supplementary was deaths as a result thereof and the assistance put about an establisnment. If I were to give a given by the Government of India to mitigate wrong information, I would have been the hardships of the famine affected people. admonished. [MR. DEPUTY CHAIRMAN in the Chair] SHRI BHUPESH GUPTA (West Bengal): THE MINISTER OF STATE IN THE Sir,. MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE (SHRI MR. CHAIRMAN: No, please. We cannot ANNASAHEB SHINDE): Mr. Deputy go on likethis. Please sit down, Mr. Bhupesh Chairman, Sir, . hon members will recall that Gupta. my senior colleague made a statement in the House on May 16, 1972, regarding drought SHRI BHUPESH GUPTA: I am not asking conditions prevailing in some areas of Orissa. any question, but are you allowing a system of As he informed the House on that occasion clarification on clarification ? parts of Orissa were affected both by floods and MR.
    [Show full text]
  • Daily English Vocab Emergency Should Never Be Forgotten
    Daily English Vocab PDF 26th June 2017 Emergency should never be forgotten Strange that in the process of selecting who should be the next President of India, the nation has forgotten the emergency imposed some forty two years ago. More than one lakh people were detained without trial. The media which could have reported the conditions prevailing was muzzled (म ुँह बंद करना या होना). Civil servants dutifully issued orders, which came through Sanjay Gandhi, the son of then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, who was the extra constitutional authority ruling the country in her name. The judiciary caved in and even upheld that Parliament could suspend the fundamental rights enshrined in the Constitution. Even the imposition of the emergency was justified. Only one judge, Justice H.R. Khanna, gave a dissenting judgment but he was superseded (हटा देना). It is another matter that the country punished Indira Gandhi, when she was ousted (बेदखल करना) from power, lock, stock and barrel, after elections were held. Similar was the fate of her son. What disappoints me is that the Supreme Court never passed a resolution or has done anything to register its disagreement with the judgment which gave the judiciary a bad name. Even now it is not too late. The Supreme Court has liberal judges on the bench. They can still dilute the situation by passing a resolution that its predecessor bench was wrong in endorsing (समर्थन करना) the emergency. At least the cabinet of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, with a lawyer minister in Arun Jaitley, should say sorry on behalf of the government for the excesses committed by its predecessor during the emergency.
    [Show full text]
  • June Ank 2016
    The Specter of Emergency Continues to Haunt the Country Mahi Pal Singh Forty one years ago this country witnessed people had been detained without trial under the the darkest chapter in the history of indepen- repressive Maintenance of Internal Security Act dent and democratic India when the state of (MISA), several high courts had given relief to emergency was proclaimed on the midnight of the detainees by accepting their right to life and 25th-26th June 1975 by Indira Gandhi, the then personal liberty granted under Article 21 and ac- Prime Minister of the country, only to satisfy cepting their writs for habeas corpus as per pow- her lust for power. The emergency was declared ers granted to them under Article 226 of the In- when Justice Jagmohanlal Sinha of the dian constitution. This issue was at the heart of Allahabad High Court invalidated her election the case of the Additional District Magistrate of to the Lok Sabha in June 1975, upholding Jabalpur v. Shiv Kant Shukla, popularly known charges of electoral fraud, in the case filed by as the Habeas Corpus case, which came up for Raj Narain, her rival candidate. The logical fol- hearing in front of the Supreme Court in Decem- low up action in any democratic country should ber 1975. Given the important nature of the case, have been for the Prime Minister indicted in the a bench comprising the five senior-most judges case to resign. Instead, she chose to impose was convened to hear the case. emergency in the country, suspend fundamen- During the arguments, Justice H.R.
    [Show full text]
  • The Indian Police Journal Vol
    Vol. 63 No. 2-3 ISSN 0537-2429 April-September, 2016 The Indian Police Journal Vol. 63 • No. 2-3 • April-Septermber, 2016 BOARD OF REVIEWERS 1. Shri R.K. Raghavan, IPS(Retd.) 13. Prof. Ajay Kumar Jain Former Director, CBI B-1, Scholar Building, Management Development Institute, Mehrauli Road, 2. Shri. P.M. Nair Sukrali Chair Prof. TISS, Mumbai 14. Shri Balwinder Singh 3. Shri Vijay Raghawan Former Special Director, CBI Prof. TISS, Mumbai Former Secretary, CVC 4. Shri N. Ramachandran 15. Shri Nand Kumar Saravade President, Indian Police Foundation. CEO, Data Security Council of India New Delhi-110017 16. Shri M.L. Sharma 5. Prof. (Dr.) Arvind Verma Former Director, CBI Dept. of Criminal Justice, Indiana University, 17. Shri S. Balaji Bloomington, IN 47405 USA Former Spl. DG, NIA 6. Dr. Trinath Mishra, IPS(Retd.) 18. Prof. N. Bala Krishnan Ex. Director, CBI Hony. Professor Ex. DG, CRPF, Ex. DG, CISF Super Computer Education Research Centre, Indian Institute of Science, 7. Prof. V.S. Mani Bengaluru Former Prof. JNU 19. Dr. Lalji Singh 8. Shri Rakesh Jaruhar MD, Genome Foundation, Former Spl. DG, CRPF Hyderabad-500003 20. Shri R.C. Arora 9. Shri Salim Ali DG(Retd.) Former Director (R&D), Former Spl. Director, CBI BPR&D 10. Shri Sanjay Singh, IPS 21. Prof. Upneet Lalli IGP-I, CID, West Bengal Dy. Director, RICA, Chandigarh 11. Dr. K.P.C. Gandhi 22. Prof. (Retd.) B.K. Nagla Director of AP Forensic Science Labs Former Professor 12. Dr. J.R. Gaur, 23 Dr. A.K. Saxena Former Director, FSL, Shimla (H.P.) Former Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • CONTEMPORARY ISSUES in MEDIA ETHICS Boctor of $I)Tios(Opi)
    CONTEMPORARY ISSUES IN MEDIA ETHICS ABSTRACT THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF Boctor of $I)tIos(opI)p IN PHILOSOPHY By MD. EHSAN Under the Supervision of M. MUQIM DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY, ALIGARH (INDIA) 2009 ABSTRACT Twenty first century is the century of knowledge and information. Knowledge is the power. Media such as newspapers, radio, television, magazines, internet etc. are the primary and central source of information and knowledge of this fast moving world. Hence, media enjoys enormous power and exerts tremendous impacts on our lives. Media as a powerful institution not only disseminates information and knowledge rather it influences our lives, our political systems and our society as a whole. It shapes our opinions, beliefs, attitudes and behaviours. It affects our decision and judgment about family, home, education, institution etc. through information and knowledge it provides. So much so that it fashions our tastes and moral standards, and socializes our younger generation. Furthermore, media has got important role to play in democracy. It is media which helps democracy become 'of and 'by' the people. It wheels democracy. It facilitates democracy by making interaction between the governed and the governor. Moreover, it is considered to be the back bone as well as the fourth pillar of democracy. * I am using media as a singular noun In view of the enormous power implicit in media, its tremendous impacts on our lives and on our governing systems, and in view of its deep penetration in our society the need arises to use it with great caution and control.
    [Show full text]
  • Economy Outlook Still Cloudy an Immediate Stimulus Is Needed to Regain the Momentum to Get India Back to 8% Growth ‘Make in India’, Reforms for Improv- Strong Rupee
    https://telegram.me/TheHindu_Zone https://telegram.me/PDF4EXAMS EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE NOIDA/DELHI THE HINDU 8 EDITORIAL MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 2017 EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE Economy outlook still cloudy An immediate stimulus is needed to regain the momentum to get India back to 8% growth ‘Make in India’, reforms for improv- strong rupee. It’s no use saying that ing ‘Ease of Doing Business’, in- since India is a net importing coun- creased access to electricity, im- try, our exchange rate should be provement in infrastructure and stronger. If we remove gold im- Perform or perish private investment are not picking ports, a large part of which is not A Cabinet reshue that was unusually up. This must become the big prior- for consumption but as store of ity. Initiatives such as Housing For value, then our trade decit will be ajit ranade free from political
    [Show full text]
  • The Wrestler's Body: Identity and Ideology in North India
    The Wrestler’s Body Identity and Ideology in North India Joseph S. Alter UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS Berkeley · Los Angeles · Oxford © 1992 The Regents of the University of California For my parents Robert Copley Alter Mary Ellen Stewart Alter Preferred Citation: Alter, Joseph S. The Wrestler's Body: Identity and Ideology in North India. Berkeley: University of California Press, c1992 1992. http://ark.cdlib.org/ark:/13030/ft6n39p104/ 2 Contents • Note on Translation • Preface • 1. Search and Research • 2. The Akhara: Where Earth Is Turned Into Gold • 3. Gurus and Chelas: The Alchemy of Discipleship • 4. The Patron and the Wrestler • 5. The Discipline of the Wrestler’s Body • 6. Nag Panchami: Snakes, Sex, and Semen • 7. Wrestling Tournaments and the Body’s Recreation • 8. Hanuman: Shakti, Bhakti, and Brahmacharya • 9. The Sannyasi and the Wrestler • 10. Utopian Somatics and Nationalist Discourse • 11. The Individual Re-Formed • Plates • The Nature of Wrestling Nationalism • Glossary 3 Note on Translation I have made every effort to ensure that the translation of material from Hindi to English is as accurate as possible. All translations are my own. In citing classical Sanskrit texts I have referenced the chapter and verse of the original source and have also cited the secondary source of the translated material. All other citations are quoted verbatim even when the English usage is idiosyncratic and not consistent with the prose style or spelling conventions employed in the main text. A translation of single words or short phrases appears in the first instance of use and sometimes again if the same word or phrase is used subsequently much later in the text.
    [Show full text]
  • Vijayawada Delhi Lucknow Bhopal Raipur Chandigarh Socio-Economic Impact It Stocks Shine Ronaldo Bhubaneswar Ranchi Dehradun Hyderabad *Late City Vol
    Follow us on: @TheDailyPioneer facebook.com/dailypioneer RNI No.APENG/2018/764698 Established 1864 ANALYSIS 7 MONEY 8 SPORTS 11 Published From CLIMATE CHANGE AND ITS SENSEX RALLIES 393 PTS; RECORD BREAKING VIJAYAWADA DELHI LUCKNOW BHOPAL RAIPUR CHANDIGARH SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPACT IT STOCKS SHINE RONALDO BHUBANESWAR RANCHI DEHRADUN HYDERABAD *LATE CITY VOL. 3 ISSUE 220 VIJAYAWADA, FRIDAY, JUNE 25, 2021; PAGES 12 `3 *Air Surcharge Extra if Applicable THAKUR ANOOP SINGH SET TO SCALE BIGGER HEIGHTS { Page 12 } www.dailypioneer.com COVID NEGATIVE 8-YR-OLD GIRL DEVELOPS SCIENTISTS SEEKS PREZ INTERVENTION SHABANA AZMI ACCUSES ALCOHOL OVER 2,000 PEOPLE IN MUMBAI FELL MULTISYSTEM INFLAMMATORY SYNDROME TO WITHDRAW PROPOSED LDAR DELIVERY PLATFORM OF CHEATING HER VICTIM TO FAKE COVID VAX DRIVES n eight-year-old girl here, who was he proposed Lakshadweep Development eteran actor Shabana Azmi on Thursday ore than 2,000 people have fallen a suspected case of Covid-19, Authority Regulation of 2021 (LDAR) is accused an alcohol delivery platform of victim to fake Covid vaccination Adeveloped multisystem inflamma- Thighly problematic and will work against Vallegedly duping her. In a Twitter post, Mcamps in Mumbai so far, the State tory syndrome in children (MIS-C), a existing legal provisions that safeguard the the 70-year-old actor claimed that she was government told the Bombay High Court on post-Covid complication that can resilience of Lakshadweep's ecology, liveli- conned by Living Liquidz after she placed an Thursday. Chief public prosecutor Deepak manifest three to six weeks after the hood and culture, say a group of scientists order at the platform but didn't receive it.
    [Show full text]
  • June 2021 2019
    CURRENT AFFAIRS ORGANIC AND ORGANISED DECEMBERJUNE 2021 2019 A LETTER FROM MY HEART Dear IAS Aspirant Friends, It gives me immense pleasure to present to you the 360º Current Affairs Magazine for the month of June 2021. The dedicated team that compiles and edits Current Affairs at IAS WINNISHERS has made sincere efforts to provide to you the most relevant and important news from the point of view of Interview, Mains and especially the soon approaching Prelims. Our mission is to build IAS aspirants into human beings who can become IAS officers. In that direction, we strive to facilitate the current affairs knowledge that is ORGANIC and ORGANISED. Due to the ongoing unfortunate situation, we fully empathize with your anxiety related to the exam. This compilation aids you in your preparation, especially the soon approaching Prelims exam. This issue also carries information on INTERVIEW GUIDANCE PROGRAM conducted by IAS WINNISHERS, which has produced amazing results in the past. Get more information on our website and benefit immensely from it. Wishing You Success Vinay Kumar R Founder & CEO, IAS WINNISHERS Vinay Kumar R International NLP & IAS Coach 9036113902 | 9886273325 www.iaswinnishers.com © Winnishers Educational Services Pvt Ltd © Winnishers Educational Services Pvt Ltd 1 Contents 1. POLITY & CONSTITUTION ............................................................................................................ 8 1.1.LAST ‘D-VOTER’ WALKS OUT OF ASSAM DETENTION CENTRE ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Institutional Alchemy: India's Two Parliaments in Comparative Context Shubhankar Dam
    Brooklyn Journal of International Law Volume 39 | Issue 2 Article 2 2014 An Institutional Alchemy: India's Two Parliaments in Comparative Context Shubhankar Dam Follow this and additional works at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/bjil Recommended Citation Shubhankar Dam, An Institutional Alchemy: India's Two Parliaments in Comparative Context, 39 Brook. J. Int'l L. (2014). Available at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/bjil/vol39/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at BrooklynWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Brooklyn Journal of International Law by an authorized editor of BrooklynWorks. AN INSTITUTIONAL ALCHEMY: INDIA’S TWO PARLIAMENTS IN COMPARATIVE CONTEXT Shubhankar Dam* INTRODUCTION: THE PRESIDENT AS THE SOLE LEGISLATOR yoti Singh Pandey, a twenty-three-year-old physiotherapy Jintern, was gang raped in New Delhi on December 16, 2012.1 Six men were involved, one of them a teenager. Their assault left Jyoti with grave injuries to her abdomen, intes- tines, and genitals.2 The teenager was the most ferocious of the six men. He raped his victim twice and “ripped out her intes- tines with his bare hands.”3 This display of hypersexualized * Shubhankar Dam, Assistant Professor of Law, Singapore Management University School of Law; LL.M. (Harvard); B.C.L. (Oxon). Former law clerk to Hon. Mr. V. N. Khare, Chief Justice of India, Indian Supreme Court. SMU Office of Research provided funding for this paper. Versions of this Article were presented at the Boston Law and Society Annual Meeting 2013 and the Inaugural Young Scholars Workshop on Socio-legal Studies, National Uni- versity Singapore Law Faculty, 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Justice at Heart Life Journey of Justice V.R
    Justice at Heart Life Journey of Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer General Editor Abhinandan Malik BA, LL B (Hons) (NALSAR), LL M (Univ. of Toronto) Justice at Heart Life Journey of Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer Salman Khurshid BA (Hons) Delhi, MA (Oxon), BCL Senior Advocate, Supreme Court of India & Former Union Minister of Law & Justice and External Affairs Dr Lokendra Malik LL B, LL M, Ph D, LL D (NLS Bangalore) Advocate, Supreme Court of India with a Foreword by P.P. R ao Senior Advocate Supreme Court of India Eastern Book Company Lucknow EASTERN BOOK COMPANY Website: www.ebc.co.in, E-mail: [email protected] Lucknow (H.O.): 34, Lalbagh, Lucknow-226 001 Phones: +91–522–4033600 (30 lines), Fax: +91–522–4033633 New Delhi: 5–B, Atma Ram House, 5th Floor 1, Tolstoy Marg, Connaught Place, New Delhi-110 001 Phones: +91–11–45752323, +91–9871197119, Fax: +91–11–41504440 Delhi: 1267, Kashmere Gate, Old Hindu College Building, Delhi-110 006 Phones: +91–11–23917616, +91–9313080904, Fax: +91–11–23921656 Bangalore: 25/1, Anand Nivas, 3rd Cross, 6th Main, Gandhinagar, Bangalore-560 009, Phone: +91–80–41225368 Allahabad: Manav Law House, Near Prithvi Garden Opp. Dr. Chandra’s Eye Clinic, Elgin Road, Civil Lines, Allahabad-211 001 Phones: +91–532–2560710, 2422023, Fax: +91–532–2623584 Ahmedabad: Satyamev Complex-1, Ground Floor, Shop No. 7 Opp. High Court Gate No. 2 (Golden Jubilee Gate) Sarkhej — Gandhinagar Highway Road, Sola, Ahmedabad-380 060 Phones: +91–532–2560710, 2422023, Fax: +91–532–2623584 Nagpur: F–9, Girish Heights, Near LIC Square, Kamptee Road, Nagpur-440 001 Phones: +91–712–6607650, +91–7028924969 www.facebook.com/easternbookcompany www.twiter.com/ebcindia Shop online at: www.ebcwebstore.com First Edition, 2016 ` 595.00 [Paperback] All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Lok Sabha Debates
    Friday, July 15, 1977 Asadha 24, 1899 (Saka) LOK SABHA DEBATES (Series) v o l. m [June 23 to July 4, 1977/Asadha 2 to 13, 1899 (Saks)] ***<**> Second Session, i*77/i*9J (Saka) (Vol. I l l contains Nos. 11 to 20) L O K SABHA SECRETARIAT NEW DELHI CON TENTS No. 30, Friday, July 15, 19771Asadha 24, 1899 (Saka) C o lu m n s Oral Answers to questions : ♦Starred questions Nos. 485, 486, 488 and 490 to 492 . 1— 33 Short Notice question No. 1 9 ................................................... 33—'42 Written Answers to questions : Starred Questions Nos. 487, 489 and 493 to 504 . 42— 56 Unstarred questions Nos. 3592 to 3630, 3632 to 3696, 3698 to 3743. 3745 to 375° and 3752 to 3757 .... 56— 233 Statement correcting Answer to Unstarred Question No. 845 dt. 1 7 - 6 - 1 9 7 7 .................................................................................. 233— 34 Re. Deaths due to liquor-poisoning in Delhi .... 234— 35 Papers laid on the T a b l e ......................................... 235— 38, 367— 68 Statement re. Reservation of vacancies for the physically handicapped for certain posts in Central Government and Public Sector Under­ takings— Dr. Pratap Chandra Chunder ...... 239_ 40 Finance (No. 2) Bill, 1977— Motion »to consider . 240— 309 Shri H.M. Patel . • • • . 240— 53 Shri Yashwantrao Chavan . • • • 253— 70 Shri Parmanand Govindjiwala f • • 270— 78 Shri Jyotirmoy Bosu • * • • 1 VO E Shri Janeshwar Mishra 1 • • . 294— 304 Shri Janardhana Poojary i • • • 304— 309 •The sign+marked above the name of a Member indicates that the question was actually asked on the floor o f the House by that Member.
    [Show full text]