DOCSLIB.ORG

Principles and Practices for Restoration of Ponderosa Pine and Dry Mixed

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Principles and Practices for Restoration of Ponderosa Pine and Dry Mixed United States Department of Agriculture Principles and Practices for the Restoration of Ponderosa Pine and Dry Mixed-Conifer Forests of the Colorado Front Range Robert N. Addington, Gregory H. Aplet, Mike A. Battaglia, Jennifer S. Briggs, Peter M. Brown, Antony S. Cheng, Yvette Dickinson, Jonas A. Feinstein, Kristen A. Pelz, Claudia M. Regan, Jim Thinnes, Rick Truex, Paula J. Fornwalt, Benjamin Gannon, Chad W. Julian, Jeffrey L. Underhill, Brett Wolk Forest Rocky Mountain General Technical Report Service Research Station RMRS-GTR-373 January 2018 Addington, Robert N.; Aplet, Gregory H.; Battaglia, Mike A.; Briggs, Jennifer S.; Brown, Peter M.; Cheng, Antony S.; Dickinson, Yvette; Feinstein, Jonas A.; Pelz, Kristen A.; Regan, Claudia M.; Thinnes, Jim; Truex, Rick; Fornwalt, Paula J.; Gannon, Benjamin; Julian, Chad W.; Underhill, Jeffrey L.; Wolk, Brett. 2018. Principles and practices for the restoration of ponderosa pine and dry mixed-conifer forests of the Colorado Front Range. RMRS-GTR-373. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 121 p. Abstract Wildfires have become larger and more severe over the past several decades on Colorado’s Front Range, catalyzing greater investments in forest management intended to mitigate wildfire risks.The complex ecological, social, and political context of the Front Range, however, makes forest management challenging, especially where multiple management goals including forest restoration exist. In this report, we present a science-based framework for managers to develop place-based approaches to forest restoration of Front Range ponderosa pine and dry mixed-conifer forests. We first present ecological information describing how Front Range forest structure and composition are shaped at multiple scales by interactions among topography, natural disturbances such as fire, and forest developmental processes. This information serves as a foundation for identifying priority areas for treatment and designing restoration projects across scales. Treatment guidelines generally reduce forest densities and surface and crown fuels, enhance spatial heterogeneity across scales, and retain drought- and fire-tolerant species, old trees, and structures important for wildlife. Implementation of these guidelines is expected to enhance forest resilience to disturbance and climate change, as well as sustain important ecosystem services. Finally, this report emphasizes the importance of adaptive management and learning through monitoring and experimentation to address uncertainties inherent in the restoration process. Keywords: disturbance regime, forest structure, resilience, restoration, scale, spatial heterogeneity, topography Front cover: clockwise from top left: Map of distribution of forest types across the Colorado Front Range; diagram showing how forest structure can vary based on topography and moisture; diagram depicting hypothetical combinations of tree density and dispersion; posttreatment stand condition at the West Ranch treatment area in Jefferson County, near the town of Conifer, Colorado (photo: J. Hansen, Jefferson Conservation District, used with permission). All Rocky Mountain Research Station publications are published by U.S. Forest Service employees and are in the public domain and available at no cost. Even though U.S. Forest Service publications are not copyrighted, they are formatted according to U.S. Department of Agriculture standards and research findings and formatting cannot be altered in reprints. Altering content or formatting, including the cover and title page, is strictly prohibited. Primary Authors Robert N. Addington is a Landscape Ecologist with the Colorado Chapter of The Nature Conservancy in Boulder, Colorado. He received B.A. degrees in biology and English from the University of Colorado at Boulder and an M.S. degree in plant biology from the University of Georgia. He developed much of the content of this document as a Research Associate with the Colorado Forest Restoration Institute at Colorado State University. Gregory H. Aplet is Senior Science Director with The Wilderness Society in Denver, Colorado. He received a B.S. degree in forestry, and an M.S. degree in wildland resource science from the University of California, Berkeley. His Ph.D. is in forest ecology from Colorado State University. Mike A. Battaglia is a Research Forester with the USFS Rocky Mountain Research Station at the Forestry Sciences Laboratory in Fort Collins, Colorado. He received a B.S. degree in biology at the University of South Carolina, an M.S. degree in forestry at Virginia Tech, and a Ph.D. in forest sciences at Colorado State University. Jennifer S. Briggs is a Research Ecologist with the U.S. Geological Survey in Denver, Colorado. She received a B.A. degree in human biology from Stanford University and a Ph.D. in ecology, evolution, and conservation biology from the University of Nevada, Reno. Peter M. Brown is Director of Rocky Mountain Tree-Ring Research, a nonprofit research organization that he founded in 1997 in Fort Collins, Colorado. He received a B.A. degree in anthropology and an M.S. degree in watershed management from the University of Arizona, and a Ph.D. in forest sciences from Colorado State University, where he is also an affiliate faculty member. Antony S. Cheng is a Professor in the Department of Forest and Rangeland Stewardship and Director of the Colorado Forest Restoration Institute at Colorado State University in Fort Collins, Colorado. He received a B.A. degree in political science at Whitman College, an M.S. degree in forestry at the University of Minnesota, and a Ph.D. in forestry at Oregon State University. Yvette Dickinson is an Assistant Professor in the School of Forest Resources and Environmental Science at Michigan Technological University in Houghton, Michigan. She received B.S. and M.S. degrees in forest science at the University of Canterbury, and a Ph.D. in forest resources at The Pennsylvania State University. Jonas A. Feinstein is the State Conservation Forester for the Natural Resources Conservation Service, Ecological Sciences Division in Denver, Colorado. He received a B.S. degree in forest biology and an M.S. degree in forest ecology and management from Colorado State University. Kristen A. Pelz contributed to this work primarily as a Research Associate for the Colorado Forest Restoration Institute at Colorado State University. She is currently a Forester in Fort Collins, Colorado with the U.S. Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Inventory and Monitoring program. She has a B.A. degree in geography/environmental studies from Middlebury College, an M.S. degree in forest science from Colorado State University, and a Ph.D. in ecology from Colorado State University. Claudia M. Regan engaged in this work as the Regional Ecologist with the U.S. Forest Service Rocky Mountain Region. Currently, she is the Deputy Center Director of the U.S. Geological Survey’s Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center. She received B.S. and M.S. degrees in forestry from Southern Illinois University, and a Ph.D. in ecology from Colorado State University. Jim Thinnes retired as the Regional Silviculturist for the U.S. Forest Service Rocky Mountain Region in 2014. He received a B.S. degree in forest resource management from Ohio State University. He was a forester with the U.S. Forest Service for 35 years in Colorado, Washington, Oregon, and Alaska. He currently serves on the Society of American Foresters’ Board of Directors. Rick Truex is the Wildlife Program Leader for the U.S. Forest Service Rocky Mountain Region in Golden, Colorado. He received a B.S. degree in wildlife from Humboldt State University and attended graduate school at the University of California, Berkeley. Contributing Authors Paula J. Fornwalt is a Research Ecologist with the USFS Rocky Mountain Research Station at the Forestry Sciences Laboratory in Fort Collins, Colorado. She received a B.S. degree in environmental science at the University of Delaware and an M.S. degree in forest science and Ph.D. in ecology at Colorado State University. Benjamin Gannon is a Research Associate with the Colorado Forest Restoration Institute at Colorado State University in Fort Collins, Colorado. He received a B.S. degree through the Program in the Environment at the University of Michigan and an M.S. degree in ecology at Colorado State University. Chad W. Julian worked on this report as a Research Associate with the Center for Managing Wildland-Urban Interface Wildfire Risk (WUI Center) and the Southern Rockies Fire Science Network at Colorado State University. He received a B.S. degree in geology with an emphasis in hydrology and watershed management from the University of Wyoming. Jeffrey L. Underhill is the Regional Silviculturist for the U.S. Forest Service Rocky Mountain Region in Denver, Colorado. He received a B.S. degree in history at Virginia Tech, an M.S. degree in forestry at the University of Tennessee, and an M.Eng. degree in geographic information systems from the University of Colorado Denver. Brett Wolk is the Assistant Director of the Colorado Forest Restoration Institute at Colorado State University in Fort Collins, Colorado. He received a B.S. degree in environmental science and a B.A. degree in International Studies at Oregon State University, and an M.S. degree in forestry at Colorado State University. Acknowledgments We thank Steve Alton, Mike Caggiano, Joseph Hansen, Laurie Huckaby, Jeff Lukas, John Norman, Rosemary Sherriff,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Denudation History and Internal Structure of the Front Range and Wet Mountains, Colorado, Based on Apatite-Fission-Track Thermoc
    NEW MEXICO BUREAU OF GEOLOGY & MINERAL RESOURCES, BULLETIN 160, 2004 41 Denudation history and internal structure of the Front Range and Wet Mountains, Colorado, based on apatite­fission­track thermochronology 1 2 1Department of Earth and Environmental Science, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801Shari A. Kelley and Charles E. Chapin 2New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801 Abstract An apatite fission­track (AFT) partial annealing zone (PAZ) that developed during Late Cretaceous time provides a structural datum for addressing questions concerning the timing and magnitude of denudation, as well as the structural style of Laramide deformation, in the Front Range and Wet Mountains of Colorado. AFT cooling ages are also used to estimate the magnitude and sense of dis­ placement across faults and to differentiate between exhumation and fault­generated topography. AFT ages at low elevationX along the eastern margin of the southern Front Range between Golden and Colorado Springs are from 100 to 270 Ma, and the mean track lengths are short (10–12.5 µm). Old AFT ages (> 100 Ma) are also found along the western margin of the Front Range along the Elkhorn thrust fault. In contrast AFT ages of 45–75 Ma and relatively long mean track lengths (12.5–14 µm) are common in the interior of the range. The AFT ages generally decrease across northwest­trending faults toward the center of the range. The base of a fossil PAZ, which separates AFT cooling ages of 45– 70 Ma at low elevations from AFT ages > 100 Ma at higher elevations, is exposed on the south side of Pikes Peak, on Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Fourteeners Checklist
    Colorado Fourteeners Checklist Rank Mountain Peak Mountain Range Elevation Date Climbed 1 Mount Elbert Sawatch Range 14,440 ft 2 Mount Massive Sawatch Range 14,428 ft 3 Mount Harvard Sawatch Range 14,421 ft 4 Blanca Peak Sangre de Cristo Range 14,351 ft 5 La Plata Peak Sawatch Range 14,343 ft 6 Uncompahgre Peak San Juan Mountains 14,321 ft 7 Crestone Peak Sangre de Cristo Range 14,300 ft 8 Mount Lincoln Mosquito Range 14,293 ft 9 Castle Peak Elk Mountains 14,279 ft 10 Grays Peak Front Range 14,278 ft 11 Mount Antero Sawatch Range 14,276 ft 12 Torreys Peak Front Range 14,275 ft 13 Quandary Peak Mosquito Range 14,271 ft 14 Mount Evans Front Range 14,271 ft 15 Longs Peak Front Range 14,259 ft 16 Mount Wilson San Miguel Mountains 14,252 ft 17 Mount Shavano Sawatch Range 14,231 ft 18 Mount Princeton Sawatch Range 14,204 ft 19 Mount Belford Sawatch Range 14,203 ft 20 Crestone Needle Sangre de Cristo Range 14,203 ft 21 Mount Yale Sawatch Range 14,200 ft 22 Mount Bross Mosquito Range 14,178 ft 23 Kit Carson Mountain Sangre de Cristo Range 14,171 ft 24 Maroon Peak Elk Mountains 14,163 ft 25 Tabeguache Peak Sawatch Range 14,162 ft 26 Mount Oxford Collegiate Peaks 14,160 ft 27 Mount Sneffels Sneffels Range 14,158 ft 28 Mount Democrat Mosquito Range 14,155 ft 29 Capitol Peak Elk Mountains 14,137 ft 30 Pikes Peak Front Range 14,115 ft 31 Snowmass Mountain Elk Mountains 14,099 ft 32 Windom Peak Needle Mountains 14,093 ft 33 Mount Eolus San Juan Mountains 14,090 ft 34 Challenger Point Sangre de Cristo Range 14,087 ft 35 Mount Columbia Sawatch Range
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Climate Center Sunset
    Table of Contents Why Is the Park Range Colorado’s Snowfall Capital? . .1 Wolf Creek Pass 1NE Weather Station Closes. .4 Climate in Review . .5 October 2001 . .5 November 2001 . .6 Colorado December 2001 . .8 Climate Water Year in Review . .9 Winter 2001-2002 Why Is It So Windy in Huerfano County? . .10 Vol. 3, No. 1 The Cold-Land Processes Field Experiment: North-Central Colorado . .11 Cover Photo: Group of spruce and fi r trees in Routt National Forest near the Colorado-Wyoming Border in January near Roger A. Pielke, Sr. Colorado Climate Center sunset. Photo by Chris Professor and State Climatologist Department of Atmospheric Science Fort Collins, CO 80523-1371 Hiemstra, Department Nolan J. Doesken of Atmospheric Science, Research Associate Phone: (970) 491-8545 Colorado State University. Phone and fax: (970) 491-8293 Odilia Bliss, Technical Editor Colorado Climate publication (ISSN 1529-6059) is published four times per year, Winter, Spring, If you have a photo or slide that you Summer, and Fall. Subscription rates are $15.00 for four issues or $7.50 for a single issue. would like considered for the cover of Colorado Climate, please submit The Colorado Climate Center is supported by the Colorado Agricultural Experiment Station it to the address at right. Enclose a note describing the contents and through the College of Engineering. circumstances including loca- tion and date it was taken. Digital Production Staff: Clara Chaffi n and Tara Green, Colorado Climate Center photo graphs can also be considered. Barbara Dennis and Jeannine Kline, Publications and Printing Submit digital imagery via attached fi les to: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Rocky Mountain National Park Lawn Lake Flood Interpretive Area (Elevation 8,640 Ft)
    1 NCSS Conference 2001 Field Tour -- Colorado Rocky Mountains Wednesday, June 27, 2001 7:00 AM Depart Ft. Collins Marriott 8:30 Arrive Rocky Mountain National Park Lawn Lake Flood Interpretive Area (elevation 8,640 ft) 8:45 "Soil Survey of Rocky Mountain National Park" - Lee Neve, Soil Survey Project Leader, Natural Resources Conservation Service 9:00 "Correlation and Classification of the Soils" - Thomas Hahn, Soil Data Quality Specialist, MLRA Office 6, Natural Resources Conservation Service 9:15-9:30 "Interpretive Story of the Lawn Lake Flood" - Rocky Mountain National Park Interpretive Staff, National Park Service 10:00 Depart 10:45 Arrive Alpine Visitors Center (elevation 11,796 ft) 11:00 "Research Needs in the National Parks" - Pete Biggam, Soil Scientist, National Park Service 11:05 "Pedology and Biogeochemistry Research in Rocky Mountain National Park" - Dr. Eugene Kelly, Colorado State University 11:25 - 11:40 "Soil Features and Geologic Processes in the Alpine Tundra"- Mike Petersen and Tim Wheeler, Soil Scientists, Natural Resources Conservation Service Box Lunch 12:30 PM Depart 1:00 Arrive Many Parks Curve Interpretive Area (elevation 9,620 ft.) View of Valleys and Glacial Moraines, Photo Opportunity 1:30 Depart 3:00 Arrive Bobcat Gulch Fire Area, Arapaho-Roosevelt National Forest 3:10 "Fire History and Burned Area Emergency Rehabilitation Efforts" - Carl Chambers, U. S. Forest Service 3:40 "Involvement and Interaction With the Private Sector"- Todd Boldt; District Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service 4:10 "Current Research on the Fire" - Colorado State University 4:45 Depart 6:00 Arrive Ft. Collins Marriott 2 3 Navigator’s Narrative Tim Wheeler Between the Fall River Visitors Center and the Lawn Lake Alluvial Debris Fan: This Park, or open grassy area, is called Horseshoe Park and is the tail end of the Park’s largest valley glacier.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Mountain Club 2009 Donors to CMC Annual Campaign [Oct
    The Colorado Mountain Club ANNUAL REPORT 2009 Annual Report 2009 1 From the Chief Executive Officer he past year was an Dominguez Escalante National Conservation Area just south incredibly challenging time of Grand Junction. On the Front Range, we celebrated the for our entire country, designation of Rocky Mountain National Park’s backcountry Teconomically speaking. Businesses as wilderness. This designation is one of the final chapters in around the country failed, and the long journey of protecting the beloved park the CMC many people saw their personal played a major role in creating in 1915. finances change significantly. Every Our Youth Education Program introduced nearly once in awhile an event happens 5,000 youth and their chaperones to an education only the that makes all of us change our great outdoors can bring, and we furthered our work with focus and get back to basics. In the severely disabled children. I can’t tell you what an honor it nonprofit world, buckling down was for me to watch a young man who has been wheelchair while still achieving our goals is bound his entire life get to the top of our climbing wall. That not new to us; we always make experience alone gave me strength to get through last year’s magic happen with very little. I’m tough times. proud to report that the Colorado The upcoming year will be another time of growth Mountain Club saw a number of and change for the CMC. We are inching our way closer to achievements this past year despite our 100th anniversary and have begun a rebranding project the economic challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • Rocky Mountain National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Report
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Geologic Resources Division Denver, Colorado Rocky Mountain National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Report Rocky Mountain National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Geologic Resources Division Denver, Colorado U.S. Department of the Interior Washington, DC Table of Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................... 1 Dedication and Acknowledgements............................................................................ 2 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 3 Purpose of the Geologic Resource Evaluation Program ............................................................................................3 Geologic Setting .........................................................................................................................................................3 Geologic Issues............................................................................................................. 5 Alpine Environments...................................................................................................................................................5 Flooding......................................................................................................................................................................5 Hydrogeology .............................................................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Contributions to the Geography of the United States, 1922
    CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE GEOGRAPHY OF THE UNITED STATES, 1922. PENEPLAINS OF4 THE FRONT RANGE AND ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK, COLORADO. By Wnxis T. LEE. PURPOSE OF THE PAPER. The purpose of this paper is to call attention to some of the major surface features in the Rocky Mountain National Park and to point out their probable correlation with similar features in neigh­ boring regions. The observations on which the paper is based were made in the summer of 1916, during an investigation in which other work demanded first consideration. This paper may therefore be considered a by-product. For the same reason many of the observa­ tions were not followed to conclusions, yet the data obtained seem to be sufficient to establish a certain order of events, the recognition of which may be of assistance in working out in detail the geologic and geographic history of the Rocky Mountain region. TWO CYCLES OF EROSION PREVIOUSLY RECOGNIZED. In an account of the general geology of the Georgetown quad­ rangle, Colo.j Ball x describes three distinct types of land forms " an old, mature mountainous upland; younger V-shaped valleys in­ cised in this upland; and glacial cirques developed at the heads of some of the streams, passing downward into U-shaped valleys." Ball describes the mountainous upland as consisting of highlands of rounded or gently sloping tops which are remnants of an ancient peneplain or old surface of erosion. Most of these remnants in the Georgetown quadrangle lie above an altitude of 11,500 feet. On thig old peneplain there were many monadnocks, some of which are now recognizable as the summits of the highest mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Annual Report
    Colorado Mountain Club ANNUAL REPORT 2012 Annual Report 2012 1 From the Chief Executive Officer he CMC just finishedof the CMC and we want to make sure they have everything celebrating our 100th they need to make our members not only satisfied after their anniversary, and what a trips, but ready for more! Tyear of celebrations it was. We are now 101 years old. So where do After that we’ll make sure we have a process in place through- we go from here? The world is very out the state to continuously monitor our membership different from when the CMC was satisfaction rates and respond accordingly. first formed, as are the lives of our members. Our mountains have In theory this sounds simple. The reality is that we can’t do more use and more environmental it without you, our biggest supporters and most loyal CMC threats. People are busier than ever fans. You make all of this possible. Without your generous before, and recreational interests support we aren’t able to create new initiatives for the future. have changed (mountain biking We aren’t able to continue working on wilderness designa- and slacklining weren’t around tions that sometimes take decades to achieve. We aren’t able 100 years ago!) Members joined to teach mountain recreation to low-income youth. And we clubs because that was their main social outlet. Well nowadays, membership could never have created our world-class mountaineering organizations aren’t as popular as they once were. Our busy lives and scarce dollars museum without your help.
    [Show full text]
  • Report 2008–1360
    The Search for Braddock’s Caldera—Guidebook for Colorado Scientific Society Fall 2008 Field Trip, Never Summer Mountains, Colorado By James C. Cole,1 Ed Larson,2 Lang Farmer,2 and Karl S. Kellogg1 1U.S. Geological Survey 2University of Colorado at Boulder (Geology Department) Open-File Report 2008–1360 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D.Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia 2008 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Suggested citation: Cole, James C., Larson, Ed, Farmer, Lang, and Kellogg, Karl S., 2008, The search for Braddock’s caldera—Guidebook for the Colorado Scientific Society Fall 2008 field trip, Never Summer Mountains, Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2008–1360, 30 p. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report. 2 Abstract The report contains the illustrated guidebook that was used for the fall field trip of the Colorado Scientific Society on September 6–7, 2008. It summarizes new information about the Tertiary geologic history of the northern Front Range and the Never Summer Mountains, particularly the late Oligocene volcanic and intrusive rocks designated the Braddock Peak complex.
    [Show full text]
  • Geography and Physiography
    General Geology by Whitman Cross, assisted toy Arthur Coe Spencer. Economic Geology by Chester Wells Puriiigton. GEOGRAPHY AND PHYSIOGRAPHY. several of its branches have cut into or across the Banded Mountain is a term used in one or two which has been recently cut through a forest cov^ broken mesa, causing much diversity in the places by Holmes as an alternative for Hesperus ering into brecciated rock, in which erosion is now GENERAL RELATIONS. topography. Peak, but as the latter was finally placed upon proceeding at a rapid rate. Geographic position. The La Plata quadrangle Culture. - -The La Plata Mountains have been the Hayden map and was generally used through­ Bear Greek. The basin head of this stream is situated in southwestern Colorado, near the found to contain metalliferous deposits, and in the out the Hayden reports, the other name is applied overlaps the extreme head of the La Plata for 1^ State line, as is shown by the index map on development of mining operations a small town, to the summit of similar character north of miles and is excavated in the stocks of Diorite the title page of this folio. It is bounded by named La Plata, has grown up in the heart of the Mount Moss. Peak and Mount Moss and of the indurated and _ meridians 108° and 108° 15' west longi-o ExtentD . and. mountains. The Rio Grande Southern Towns, The other names on the map are those of local metamorphosed strata between them. Polished tude and parallels 37° 15' and 37° 30' drainage- Railroad crosses the quadrangle south usage as far as that could be ascertained.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2019 Partners List Download
    2019 Partners A Precious Child Adams County Parks and Open Space Arapahoe Community College ARC Arizona Conservation Corps Arkansas River Watershed Invasive Plants Partnership Auraria Campus: Auraria Sustainable Campus Program Aurora Public Schools Aurora Water Barr Lake State Park Bayaud Enterprises Bessie’s Hope Black Hills Credit Union Bobcat of the Rockies Boomers Leading Change Boys & Girls Clubs of Metro Denver Brady Exploration School Brighton Heritage Academy Bureau of Land Management – Royal Gorge Field Office Cal-Wood Education Center Cañon City Area Recreation and Park District Castlewood Canyon State Park Center for Employment Opportunities Central Colorado Conservancy Chatfield State Park Cherry Creek State Park Cheyenne Mountain State Park Children's Farm City and County of Broomfield Open Space and Trails City and County of Denver City and County of Denver Parks and Recreation City of Aurora Generation WILD City of Aurora Parks, Recreation and Open Space City of Boulder Open Space and Mountain Parks City of Brighton Parks and Recreation City of Brighton Parks, Open Space and Forestry City of Colorado Springs Parks, Trails and Open Space City of Commerce City-- Parks, Recreation and Golf City of Manitou Springs City of Pueblo City of Thornton City of Trinidad City of Wheat Ridge Parks and Recreation Colavria Hospitality Colorado Building and Construction Trades Council Colorado Cardiac CPR Colorado College: Environmental Studies Program Colorado Finishing Trades Institute Colorado High School Charter Colorado Mesa University:
    [Show full text]
  • Deglaciation and Postglacial Treeline Fluctuation in the Northern San Juan Mountains, Colorado
    Deglaciation and Postglacial Treeline Fluctuation in the Northern San Juan Mountains, Colorado Professional Paper 1782 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover photo: Site of former Lake Emma (foreground) and Emery Peak (4,057 meters) to the south, northern San Juan Mountains, Colo. Deglaciation and Postglacial Treeline Fluctuation in the Northern San Juan Mountains, Colorado By Paul E. Carrara Professional Paper 1782 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2011 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Carrara, P.E., 2011, Deglaciation and postglacial treeline fluctuation in the northern San Juan Mountains, Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1782, 48 p. iii Contents
    [Show full text]