DOCSLIB.ORG

People and Nature on the Mountaintop a Resource and Impact Study of Longs Peak in Rocky Mountain National Park

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
People and Nature on the Mountaintop a Resource and Impact Study of Longs Peak in Rocky Mountain National Park People and Nature on the Mountaintop A Resource and Impact Study of Longs Peak in Rocky Mountain National Park A Project funded by the Rocky Mountain Cooperative Ecosystems Study Unit, Rocky Mountain National Park, and Colorado State University. Ruth M. Alexander, Principal Investigator and Author, Professor of History, Colorado State University Catherine Moore, Graduate Research Assistant, Center for Public History and Archaeology, Colorado State University 2010 “Longs Peak is a citadel. I mean it’s a castle with defenses. And the Keyhole Route just so intricately snakes its way 270 degrees around the mountain, sneaking through the mountain’s defenses to get to the top.” – Mike Caldwell, 2009.1 0EOPLE AND .ATURE ON THE -OUNTAINTOP s A Resource and Impact Study of Longs Peak in Rocky Mountain National Park INTRODUCTION his study examines the history of Longs Peak from Longs may be formidable, but it is also a stunningly the 1920s to the present, providing a narrative beautiful peak widely visible to residents and visitors all Tthat traces over time the values and practices of along the northern Front Range. It captures the eye and the individuals who climbed the peak, their impact on its natural imagination. Rangers throughout the park’s history have and cultural resources, and the efforts of park rangers both recognized its powerful allure to those wishing to experience to facilitate climbing and protect the peak from harm.2 Longs simultaneously its aesthetic splendors and the challenges Peak is an icon of the Rocky Mountain West. It is one of of its granite fortifications. In the first years after Rocky Colorado’s tallest mountains, the only fourteener in Rocky Mountain National Park was founded in 1915, hundreds of Mountain National Park, and a peak that has for more than mountain enthusiasts annually climbed Longs Peak via non- a century inspired adventuresome men and women to test technical routes and, by the 1920s, the peak was attracting a themselves against its bouldered slopes, sheer rock faces, and growing number of ambitious rock climbers to its daunting severe alpine weather. Longs Peak is “a castle with defenses” East Face. During the Depression decade of the 1930s, nearly that does not readily open itself to intruders. Even the 2000 people climbed to the summit of Longs annually. The non-technical routes to its summit involve long stretches of popularity of the peak continued to grow such that, by the scrambling over unstable rock and along exposed ledges; the late 1960s, nearly 4000 climbers ascended to the summit via technical routes up its East Face and nearly vertical Diamond non-technical routes each year while hundreds of technical wall present expert rock climbers with some of the most climbers made their way up the East Face and onto the challenging alpine ascents in North America.3 Diamond, a nine-hundred foot wall of vertical cracks, chimneys, waterfalls, and overhanging rock. During the 1 Mike Caldwell, interview with Ruth M. Alexander, August, 12, 2009, 1970s approximately 7500 people summited the mountain transcript, ROMO Archives. each year and in recent decades the typical number of View of the East Face and Diamond on Longs Peak from 2 The author wishes to acknowledge the generous assistance of Cheri climbers making it to summit of Longs – via technical and Yost, Tim Burchett, Mark Magnuson, Jeff Connor, Mark Pita, and Ron Chasm Junction. This iconic view of the East Face has Thomas, all of Rocky Mountain National Park, in the preparation of this non-technical routes – has exceeded 10,000 annually. Many been encountered by the hundreds of thousands of visitors report. Thanks are also due to Maren Bzdek, Josh Weinberg, and Leslie thousands more climb part way up the peak each year, who have hiked the East Longs Peak trail to the mountain McCutchen , Center for Public History and Archaeology, Colorado over the past century. Image courtesy of Rocky Mountain State University, Fort Collins, Colorado. Cori Knudten, also with the National Park. CPHA, generously shared documents and insight from her own research Longs Peak has been spelled in two ways: Longs, and Long’s. In this on automobile tourism and Longs Peak. Jason Sibold, Department of study, I generally use Longs, the spelling that became most common Anthropology, Colorado State University, offered timely assistance in the over the course of the twentieth century. I use the peak’s alternative preparation of ArcGIS mapping. spelling when it appears that way in titles I reference or in passages 3 For those readers with orthographic interests, I wish to note that that I quote directly. 1 going to Chasm Junction, Chasm Lake, or the Boulderfield. While Longs offers exhilarating physical challenges Throughout the past century most people have climbed and stunning vistas to climbers, its alpine environment during the months of July and August when all routes to is fragile: rocks, plants, and wildlife are vulnerable to the peak’s summit are reasonably free of snow and ice. June damage wrought by the presence and action of humans. and September can also be busy months on Longs Peak, And in their own way, the spirited humans who climb depending on weather conditions. During the harsh winter Longs Peak are also fragile: they’re vulnerable to accidents months a smaller number of skilled ice climbers, skiers, and and lightning strikes, to high winds, rain and snow, to snowshoers have sought exhilaration on the peak’s ice walls unwelcome or unpleasant encounters with other climbers, and snowy slopes.4 and to the results of their own poor judgment and inadequate preparation. 4 The non-technical routes to the summit of Longs are classed as Because Longs Peak has been a destination of technical routes when snow and ice are present. Park rangers monitor enormous popularity but is also a site of extraordinary the peak to determine when to open these routes to non-technical climbers. The number of climbers on Longs Peak in any given year can grandeur and vulnerability – human and non-human – it never be determined with precision. Climbers who reach the top of offers an unusually important opportunity to study the Longs Peak may sign the summit register, but it’s likely that many don’t see the register, don’t bother to sign it, or find that no space remains on history of park managers’ efforts to balance the twofold its pages for more names to be added. Moreover, the summit registers, mission of the national parks. According to the National dating from about 1915 and maintained by the Colorado Mountain Club, Park Service Organic Act of 1916, the parks must “conserve offer only the names of those who reach the top of Longs, not the names of those who go only part way up the mountain. Many climbers don’t the scenery and the natural and historical objects and intend to go all the way to the summit; others hope to make it to the top the wild life therein”; but they must also “provide for the but turn back because of fatigue, bad weather, fear of heights, altitude sickness or injury. All non-technical climbers have long been encouraged enjoyment of the same in such manner and by such means to sign registers at the various trailheads leading to Longs, but many do as will leave them unimpaired for future generations.”5 The not bother to do so, and park rangers have never tried to capture the National Park Service’s mandate “to protect and preserve” numbers of total climbers on Longs from the trailhead registers. extends simultaneously to the parks and to the people who Dr. George Wallace’s 2002-2004 study of the number of hikers using the East Longs Peak Trail to reach the summit of the peak revealed that visit them. from May 30 to October 14, 2002 an estimated 35,000 people hiked the The Organic Act imagined and sought to encourage East Longs Peak Trail, and approximately 9600 of those hikers reached the summit via the Keyhole route. See “Climbing the Longs Peak through wise management a mutually beneficial relationship Keyhole Route,” a one-page summary of Dr. Wallace’s project available between the undeveloped natural world and human society. at http://www.nps.gov/romo/parkmgmt/research_publications. It was signed into law at a time of growing concern among htm#CP_JUMP_366914. men such as Teddy Roosevelt, John Muir, Frederick Law The summit registers for the years up to 1945 are in the ROMO archives. Summit registers since 1945 are held in the Colorado Olmstead and others that urban industrial society was Mountain Club archives at the American Mountaineering Center, harmful to humans’ moral and physical well-being. Cities Golden, Colorado. Park staff (or Colorado Mountain Club volunteers) have not consistently tallied the figures in the summit registers, though and factories provided compelling evidence of human totals are available for some years in the park’s superintendent reports, energy, ambition, and ingenuity, but their filth, disorder, in the CMC Peak Register files, and in Paul W. Nesbit, Longs Peak: and suffering also offered proof of human imperfection. Its Story and a Climbing Guide, first published in 1946 and now in its eleventh edition. For this report, I have consulted both the eight edition of Nesbit’s book (Boulder, CO: Norman L. Nesbit, 1972) and the eleventh edition, revised and updated by Stan Adamson (Boulder, 5 The National Park Service Organic Act, 16. U.S. C.1. http://www.nps. CO: Grey Wolf Books, 2005). gov/legacy/organic-act.htm 0EOPLE AND .ATURE ON THE -OUNTAINTOP s A Resource and Impact Study of Longs Peak in Rocky Mountain National Park Americans assumed that European “high culture” offered a the promotion of human enjoyment.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Principles and Practices for Restoration of Ponderosa Pine and Dry Mixed
    United States Department of Agriculture Principles and Practices for the Restoration of Ponderosa Pine and Dry Mixed-Conifer Forests of the Colorado Front Range Robert N. Addington, Gregory H. Aplet, Mike A. Battaglia, Jennifer S. Briggs, Peter M. Brown, Antony S. Cheng, Yvette Dickinson, Jonas A. Feinstein, Kristen A. Pelz, Claudia M. Regan, Jim Thinnes, Rick Truex, Paula J. Fornwalt, Benjamin Gannon, Chad W. Julian, Jeffrey L. Underhill, Brett Wolk Forest Rocky Mountain General Technical Report Service Research Station RMRS-GTR-373 January 2018 Addington, Robert N.; Aplet, Gregory H.; Battaglia, Mike A.; Briggs, Jennifer S.; Brown, Peter M.; Cheng, Antony S.; Dickinson, Yvette; Feinstein, Jonas A.; Pelz, Kristen A.; Regan, Claudia M.; Thinnes, Jim; Truex, Rick; Fornwalt, Paula J.; Gannon, Benjamin; Julian, Chad W.; Underhill, Jeffrey L.; Wolk, Brett. 2018. Principles and practices for the restoration of ponderosa pine and dry mixed-conifer forests of the Colorado Front Range. RMRS-GTR-373. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 121 p. Abstract Wildfires have become larger and more severe over the past several decades on Colorado’s Front Range, catalyzing greater investments in forest management intended to mitigate wildfire risks.The complex ecological, social, and political context of the Front Range, however, makes forest management challenging, especially where multiple management goals including forest restoration exist. In this report, we present a science-based framework for managers to develop place-based approaches to forest restoration of Front Range ponderosa pine and dry mixed-conifer forests. We first present ecological information describing how Front Range forest structure and composition are shaped at multiple scales by interactions among topography, natural disturbances such as fire, and forest developmental processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Denudation History and Internal Structure of the Front Range and Wet Mountains, Colorado, Based on Apatite-Fission-Track Thermoc
    NEW MEXICO BUREAU OF GEOLOGY & MINERAL RESOURCES, BULLETIN 160, 2004 41 Denudation history and internal structure of the Front Range and Wet Mountains, Colorado, based on apatite­fission­track thermochronology 1 2 1Department of Earth and Environmental Science, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801Shari A. Kelley and Charles E. Chapin 2New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801 Abstract An apatite fission­track (AFT) partial annealing zone (PAZ) that developed during Late Cretaceous time provides a structural datum for addressing questions concerning the timing and magnitude of denudation, as well as the structural style of Laramide deformation, in the Front Range and Wet Mountains of Colorado. AFT cooling ages are also used to estimate the magnitude and sense of dis­ placement across faults and to differentiate between exhumation and fault­generated topography. AFT ages at low elevationX along the eastern margin of the southern Front Range between Golden and Colorado Springs are from 100 to 270 Ma, and the mean track lengths are short (10–12.5 µm). Old AFT ages (> 100 Ma) are also found along the western margin of the Front Range along the Elkhorn thrust fault. In contrast AFT ages of 45–75 Ma and relatively long mean track lengths (12.5–14 µm) are common in the interior of the range. The AFT ages generally decrease across northwest­trending faults toward the center of the range. The base of a fossil PAZ, which separates AFT cooling ages of 45– 70 Ma at low elevations from AFT ages > 100 Ma at higher elevations, is exposed on the south side of Pikes Peak, on Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 10024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determination for individual properties and districts. See instruction in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking ``x'' in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter ``N/A'' for ``not applicable.'' For functions, architectural classification, materials and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name East Longs Peak Trail; Longs Peak Trail; Keyhole Route; Shelf Trail other names/site number 5LR.11413; 5BL.10344 2. Location street & number West of State Highway 7 (ROMO) [N/A] not for publication city or town Allenspark [X] vicinity state Colorado code CO county Larimer; Boulder code 069; 013 zip code 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this [X] nomination [ ] request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property [ ] meets [ ] does not meet the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant [ ] nationally [ ] statewide [X] locally.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Fourteeners Checklist
    Colorado Fourteeners Checklist Rank Mountain Peak Mountain Range Elevation Date Climbed 1 Mount Elbert Sawatch Range 14,440 ft 2 Mount Massive Sawatch Range 14,428 ft 3 Mount Harvard Sawatch Range 14,421 ft 4 Blanca Peak Sangre de Cristo Range 14,351 ft 5 La Plata Peak Sawatch Range 14,343 ft 6 Uncompahgre Peak San Juan Mountains 14,321 ft 7 Crestone Peak Sangre de Cristo Range 14,300 ft 8 Mount Lincoln Mosquito Range 14,293 ft 9 Castle Peak Elk Mountains 14,279 ft 10 Grays Peak Front Range 14,278 ft 11 Mount Antero Sawatch Range 14,276 ft 12 Torreys Peak Front Range 14,275 ft 13 Quandary Peak Mosquito Range 14,271 ft 14 Mount Evans Front Range 14,271 ft 15 Longs Peak Front Range 14,259 ft 16 Mount Wilson San Miguel Mountains 14,252 ft 17 Mount Shavano Sawatch Range 14,231 ft 18 Mount Princeton Sawatch Range 14,204 ft 19 Mount Belford Sawatch Range 14,203 ft 20 Crestone Needle Sangre de Cristo Range 14,203 ft 21 Mount Yale Sawatch Range 14,200 ft 22 Mount Bross Mosquito Range 14,178 ft 23 Kit Carson Mountain Sangre de Cristo Range 14,171 ft 24 Maroon Peak Elk Mountains 14,163 ft 25 Tabeguache Peak Sawatch Range 14,162 ft 26 Mount Oxford Collegiate Peaks 14,160 ft 27 Mount Sneffels Sneffels Range 14,158 ft 28 Mount Democrat Mosquito Range 14,155 ft 29 Capitol Peak Elk Mountains 14,137 ft 30 Pikes Peak Front Range 14,115 ft 31 Snowmass Mountain Elk Mountains 14,099 ft 32 Windom Peak Needle Mountains 14,093 ft 33 Mount Eolus San Juan Mountains 14,090 ft 34 Challenger Point Sangre de Cristo Range 14,087 ft 35 Mount Columbia Sawatch Range
    [Show full text]
  • Download This
    NPS Form 10-900 —. OMB No. 10024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determination for individual properti.es aTfa^IslftcTST6ee<iie^truction in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an Item does not apply to the property being documented, enter' N/A for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property__________________________________________ historic name East Longs Peak Trail: Longs Peak Trail: Keyhole Route: Shelf Trail________ other names/site number 5LR.11413: 5BL.10344___________________________ 2. Location_______________________________________________ street & number West of State Highway 7 (ROMO)______________ [N/A] not for publication city or town Allenspark_________________________________ [X] vicinity state Colorado___ code CO county Larimer; Boulder code 069: 013 zip code 3. State/Federal Agency Certification __ As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this [X] nomination [ ] request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property [ ] meets [ ] does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Climate Center Sunset
    Table of Contents Why Is the Park Range Colorado’s Snowfall Capital? . .1 Wolf Creek Pass 1NE Weather Station Closes. .4 Climate in Review . .5 October 2001 . .5 November 2001 . .6 Colorado December 2001 . .8 Climate Water Year in Review . .9 Winter 2001-2002 Why Is It So Windy in Huerfano County? . .10 Vol. 3, No. 1 The Cold-Land Processes Field Experiment: North-Central Colorado . .11 Cover Photo: Group of spruce and fi r trees in Routt National Forest near the Colorado-Wyoming Border in January near Roger A. Pielke, Sr. Colorado Climate Center sunset. Photo by Chris Professor and State Climatologist Department of Atmospheric Science Fort Collins, CO 80523-1371 Hiemstra, Department Nolan J. Doesken of Atmospheric Science, Research Associate Phone: (970) 491-8545 Colorado State University. Phone and fax: (970) 491-8293 Odilia Bliss, Technical Editor Colorado Climate publication (ISSN 1529-6059) is published four times per year, Winter, Spring, If you have a photo or slide that you Summer, and Fall. Subscription rates are $15.00 for four issues or $7.50 for a single issue. would like considered for the cover of Colorado Climate, please submit The Colorado Climate Center is supported by the Colorado Agricultural Experiment Station it to the address at right. Enclose a note describing the contents and through the College of Engineering. circumstances including loca- tion and date it was taken. Digital Production Staff: Clara Chaffi n and Tara Green, Colorado Climate Center photo graphs can also be considered. Barbara Dennis and Jeannine Kline, Publications and Printing Submit digital imagery via attached fi les to: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Rocky Mountain National Park Lawn Lake Flood Interpretive Area (Elevation 8,640 Ft)
    1 NCSS Conference 2001 Field Tour -- Colorado Rocky Mountains Wednesday, June 27, 2001 7:00 AM Depart Ft. Collins Marriott 8:30 Arrive Rocky Mountain National Park Lawn Lake Flood Interpretive Area (elevation 8,640 ft) 8:45 "Soil Survey of Rocky Mountain National Park" - Lee Neve, Soil Survey Project Leader, Natural Resources Conservation Service 9:00 "Correlation and Classification of the Soils" - Thomas Hahn, Soil Data Quality Specialist, MLRA Office 6, Natural Resources Conservation Service 9:15-9:30 "Interpretive Story of the Lawn Lake Flood" - Rocky Mountain National Park Interpretive Staff, National Park Service 10:00 Depart 10:45 Arrive Alpine Visitors Center (elevation 11,796 ft) 11:00 "Research Needs in the National Parks" - Pete Biggam, Soil Scientist, National Park Service 11:05 "Pedology and Biogeochemistry Research in Rocky Mountain National Park" - Dr. Eugene Kelly, Colorado State University 11:25 - 11:40 "Soil Features and Geologic Processes in the Alpine Tundra"- Mike Petersen and Tim Wheeler, Soil Scientists, Natural Resources Conservation Service Box Lunch 12:30 PM Depart 1:00 Arrive Many Parks Curve Interpretive Area (elevation 9,620 ft.) View of Valleys and Glacial Moraines, Photo Opportunity 1:30 Depart 3:00 Arrive Bobcat Gulch Fire Area, Arapaho-Roosevelt National Forest 3:10 "Fire History and Burned Area Emergency Rehabilitation Efforts" - Carl Chambers, U. S. Forest Service 3:40 "Involvement and Interaction With the Private Sector"- Todd Boldt; District Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service 4:10 "Current Research on the Fire" - Colorado State University 4:45 Depart 6:00 Arrive Ft. Collins Marriott 2 3 Navigator’s Narrative Tim Wheeler Between the Fall River Visitors Center and the Lawn Lake Alluvial Debris Fan: This Park, or open grassy area, is called Horseshoe Park and is the tail end of the Park’s largest valley glacier.
    [Show full text]
  • Rocky Mountain National Park
    A Resource Assessment ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION JULY 2002 State of the Parks Program More than a century ago, Congress established Yellowstone as C ONTENTS the world’s first national park. That single act was the begin- ning of a remarkable and ongoing effort to protect this nation’s natural, historical, and cultural heritage. Summary page 1 But over the years, Americans have learned that designat- I. ALPINE WONDER 4 ing national parks does not automatically ensure the well being of the resources parks are meant to protect and the his- II. ROCKY MOUNTAIN ASSESSMENT 6 tory those resources represent. Many parks are threatened by incompatible development of adjacent lands, air and water Natural Resources 7 pollution, skyrocketing visitation, and rapid increases in Native Biodiversity 7 motorized recreation. Historic structures suffer from deterio- Terrestrial Communities and Systems 9 ration. Most cultural landscapes have yet to be adequately Freshwater Communities and Systems 12 inventoried. Only a small part—usually less than 10 percent—of the Cultural Resources 14 National Park Service budget each year is earmarked for man- History and Historic Structures 14 agement of natural, historical, and cultural resources. And in Collections and Archives 16 most years, only about 7 percent of permanent park employ- Archaeological Sites 17 ees work in jobs directly related to preserving park resources. The National Parks Conservation Association initiated Ethnography 18 the State of the Parks program in 2000 to assess the condition Cultural Landscapes 19 of natural and cultural resources in the parks, forecast the like- Stewardship Capacity 20 ly future condition of those resources, and determine how well equipped the National Park Service is to protect the Funding and Staffing 20 park—its stewardship capacity.
    [Show full text]
  • Rocky Mountain National Park Trail System
    Rocky Mountain National Park Trail Map HOURGLASS RESERVIOR Rocky M4ountain National Park Trail System 1 TRAP LAKE Y TWIN LAKE RESERVIOR W PETERSON LAKE H JOE WRIGHT RESERVIOR O L O C ZIMMERMAN LAKE MIRROR LAKE R E P P U , S S A P Y M Corral Creek USFS Trail Head M (! U M LAKE HUSTED 4 HWY 1 LOST LAKE COLO PPER LAKE LOUISE LOST LAKE, U #*Lost Falls Rowe Mountain LAKE DUNRAVEN LOST LAKE 13184 , LOWER Dunraven USFS Trail Head LONG DRAW RESERVIOR D (! Rowe Peak 13404 Hagues PeaDk 13560 D MICHIGAN LAKES TH LAKE AGNES E S SNOW LAKE La Poudre Pass Trail Head AD Mummy Mountain (! DL E 13425 D Fairchild Mountain 13502 D CRYSTAL LAKE LAWN LAKE TH UN Ypsilon Mountain DE R 13514 PA B SS D L A C R K PE C P SPECTACLE LAKES A , U N ER Chiquita, Mount Y IV D O R ST 13069 N E WE , DR IL U U A Y P O 4 TR P P P 3 TE Chapin Pass Trail Head S E Bridal Veil Falls LAKE OF THE CLOUDS Y U (! IL W O R #* H S N ER Cow Creek Trail Head U L K, LOW (! R A REE K OW C E C E V C(!rater Trail Head I (! U R POUDRE LAKE Cache La Poudre Trail Head S H O (! W D Milner Pass Trail Head Chasm Falls Y A #* R 3 Horseshoe Falls 4 Rock Cut Trail Head O ! #* L ( Thousand Falls O #* C Lawn Lake Trail Head FAN LAKE (! Colorado River Trail Head SHEEP LAKES (! Timber Lake Trail Head (! Beaver Ponds Trail Head (! CASCADE LAKE HIDDEN VALLEY BEAVER PONDS Lumpy Ridge Trail Head Ute Crossing Trail Head (! (! FOREST LAKE Deer Mountain/ Deer Ridge Trail Head ARROWHEAD LAKE ROCK LAKE (! U TE T TOWN OF RA LAKE ESTES IL Never Summer Trail Head INKWELL LAKE EA ESTES PARK (! ST U Upper Beaver Meadows
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to the Geology of Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado
    A Guide to the Geology of ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK COLORADO For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. C. Price 15 cents A Guide to the Geology of ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK [ COLORADO ] By Carroll H. Wegemann Former Regional Geologist, National Park Service UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR HAROLD L. ICKES, Secretary NATIONAL PARK SERVICE . NEWTON B. DRURY, Director UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1944 Table of Contents PAGE INTRODUCTION in BASIC FACTS ON GEOLOGY 1 THE OLDEST ROCKS OF THE PARK 2 THE FIRST MOUNTAINS 3 The Destruction of the First Mountains 3 NATURE OF PALEOZOIC DEPOSITS INDICATES PRESENCE OF SECOND MOUNTAINS 4 THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS 4 Time and Form of the Mountain Folding 5 Erosion Followed by Regional Uplift 5 Evidences of Intermittent Uplift 8 THE GREAT ICE AGE 10 Continental Glaciers 11 Valley Glaciers 11 POINTS OF INTEREST ALONG PARK ROADS 15 ROAD LOGS 18 Thompson River Entrance to Deer Ridge Junction 18 Deer Ridge Junction to Fall River Pass via Fall River .... 20 Fall River Pass to Poudre Lakes 23 Trail Ridge Road between Fall River Pass and Deer Ridge Junction 24 Deer Ridge Junction to Fall River Entrance via Horseshoe Park 29 Bear Lake Road 29 ILLUSTRATIONS LONGS PEAK FROM BEAR LAKE Front and back covers CHASM FALLS Inside back cover FIGURE PAGE 1. GEOLOGIC TIME SCALE iv 2. LONGS PEAK FROM THE EAST 3 3. PROFILE SECTION ACROSS THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS 5 4. ANCIENT EROSIONAL PLAIN ON TRAIL RIDGE 6 5. ANCIENT EROSIONAL PLAIN FROM FLATTOP MOUNTAIN ... 7 6. VIEW NORTHWEST FROM LONGS PEAK 8 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Mountain Club 2009 Donors to CMC Annual Campaign [Oct
    The Colorado Mountain Club ANNUAL REPORT 2009 Annual Report 2009 1 From the Chief Executive Officer he past year was an Dominguez Escalante National Conservation Area just south incredibly challenging time of Grand Junction. On the Front Range, we celebrated the for our entire country, designation of Rocky Mountain National Park’s backcountry Teconomically speaking. Businesses as wilderness. This designation is one of the final chapters in around the country failed, and the long journey of protecting the beloved park the CMC many people saw their personal played a major role in creating in 1915. finances change significantly. Every Our Youth Education Program introduced nearly once in awhile an event happens 5,000 youth and their chaperones to an education only the that makes all of us change our great outdoors can bring, and we furthered our work with focus and get back to basics. In the severely disabled children. I can’t tell you what an honor it nonprofit world, buckling down was for me to watch a young man who has been wheelchair while still achieving our goals is bound his entire life get to the top of our climbing wall. That not new to us; we always make experience alone gave me strength to get through last year’s magic happen with very little. I’m tough times. proud to report that the Colorado The upcoming year will be another time of growth Mountain Club saw a number of and change for the CMC. We are inching our way closer to achievements this past year despite our 100th anniversary and have begun a rebranding project the economic challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • Rocky Mountain National Park Hikes for Families with Ratings 0 1,000 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000
    Rocky Mountain National Park Trail Map Corral Creek USFS Trail Head Rocky Moun!(tain National Park Hikes for Families LAKE HUSTED LOST LAKE LAKE LOUISE Lost Falls #* Rowe Mountain LAKE DUNRAVEN 13184 Dunraven USFS Trail Head LONG DRAW RESERVIOR D !( Rowe Peak 13404 D Hagues Peak 13560 D La Poudre Pass Trail Head !( Mummy Mountain 13425 D Fairchild Mountain 13502 D CRYSTAL LAKE LAWN LAKE Ypsilon Mountain 13514 D SPECTACLE LAKES Chiquita, Mount D 13069 34 Y W H S Crater Bighorn Family Hike U Chapin Pass Trail Head Bridal Veil Falls !( #* Cow Creek Trail Head !( Cache La Poudre Trail Head Crater Trail Head !( !( Horseshoe Falls Family Hike POUDRE LAKE !( Milner Pass Trail Head Chasm Falls #* Horseshoe Falls Rock Cut Trail Head #* !( Thousand Falls #* Lake Irene Family Hike Lawn Lake Trail Head FAN LAKE !( SHEEP LAKES !( !( Beaver Ponds Trail Head !( CASCADE LAKE HIDDEN VALLEY BEAVER PONDS Lumpy Ridge Trail Head !( Ute Crossing Trail Head U !( S HW FOREST LAKE Beaver Ponds Family Hike Y 34 Deer Mountain/ Deer Ridge Trail Head ARROWHEAD LAKE ROCK LAKE !( TOWN OF LAKE ESTES ESTES PARK INKWELL LAKE !( Upper Beaver Meadows Trail Head AZURE LAKE !( TROUT FISHING POND (ARTIFICIAL US HWY 36 US H 7 WY 36 Y W H O L Cub Lake Trail Head O !( !( Fern Lake Trail Head C !( Fern Falls Family Hike HOURGLASS LAKE Fern Falls #* CUB LAKE !( Hallowell Park Trail Head Marguerite Falls !( #* ODESSA LAKE BIERSTADT LAKE East Portal Trail Head Sprague Lake Family Hike !( Grace Falls #* Sprague Lake Trail Head !( !( Bear Lake Family Hike Bierstadt Lake Trail Head
    [Show full text]