The 2019 Partners List Download
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Of 4 2020 Annual Report on the Administration of Colorado Parks
2020 Annual Report on the Administration of Colorado Parks and Wildlife February 2021 To: House Agriculture, Livestock, and Water Committee Senate Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee I. Statutory Requirements On June 6, 2011, Governor Hickenlooper signed Senate Bill 11-208 into law, merging the Division of Parks and Outdoor Recreation and the Division of Wildlife into the Division of Parks and Wildlife, referred to herein as Colorado Parks and Wildlife or CPW. On June 4, 2012, House Bill 12-1317 was signed into law to finalize the merger of the Divisions and to create the Parks and Wildlife Commission. Among the requirements of HB 12-1317 is the delivery to the Legislature of an annual report, more fully described below: C.R.S. 33-9-106 (2) “Beginning in 2013 AND NOTWITHSTANDING SECTION 24-1-136 (11), C.R.S., the executive director shall report annually to the joint house agriculture, livestock, and natural resources committee and the senate agriculture, natural resources, and energy committee, or any successor committees, regarding the administration of the division, including an evaluation of division resources and their utilization and an identification of opportunities for efficiencies. Each such report must summarize stakeholder outreach conducted during the prior year and must also identify disposition of assets and cost savings, both planned and realized, since the previous year, including savings pertaining to personnel, equipment, services, and provisioning.” II. Division Resource Utilization Utilization of division resources is reported to the Parks and Wildlife Commission. The FY 19-20 report on sources and uses of funds is available on the Commission’s website. -
C. Developing Trail Systems
C. DEVELOPING TRAIL SYSTEMS Trails are more than simply lines on a map, a form of transportation or route to destinations. Trails are an experience. Engaging trails systems provide a sense of unique place, highlight natural topography and attract outdoor-based tourism. A vast and varied experience hooks trails users and leaves them wanting to return for more exploration. This tool kit offers suggestions for building destination-worthy trail systems. Best Management Practices For Developing Trail Systems Sustainability Simplified. Sustainable trails provide an intended experience in a steady state with minimal undesired impacts. Sustainability does not have to mean “sanitizing” or “dumbing- down” trails… yet, expect to hear that concern. Well-designed trail systems need not come at the detriment of natural resources. Trails can actually help protect resources by fostering appreciation for the great outdoors and by managing users Greenbelt Trail in Costilla County (courtesy of Root to minimize impacts while maximizing fun. Four House Studio) components of trail sustainability: • Physical: Trails remains in intended condition with rhythmic vs. tight and twisty) and the distinctive minimal erosion, braiding, or degradation. qualities of a trail or system. • Environmental: Trails minimize disturbance to flora • Challenge tests fitness and ability. Treat each as + fauna and sedimentation to watersheds. Planned a different measure. Ability refers to technical trails systems—even with increased mileage— aptitudes like sure-footedness, bike handling, can yield less impact than existing conditions scrambling or even navigation. Fitness refers by keeping users on trail, reducing erosion and to the capacity for sustained effort required for avoiding areas of greatest habitat sensitivity. -
CITY of HUBER HEIGHTS STATE of OHIO City Dog Park Committee Meeting Minutes March 29, 2018 6:00 P.M
Agenda Page 1 of 1 CITY OF HUBER HEIGHTS STATE OF OHIO City Dog Park Committee March 29, 2018 6:00 P.M. City Hall – 6131 Taylorsville Road – Council Chambers 1. Call Meeting To Order/Roll Call: 2. Approval of Minutes: A. March 22, 2018 3. Topics of Discussion: A. City Dog Park Planning and Discussion 4. Adjournment: https://destinyhosted.com/print_all.cfm?seq=3604&reloaded=true&id=48237 3/29/2018 CITY OF HUBER HEIGHTS STATE OF OHIO City Dog Park Committee Meeting Minutes March 29, 2018 6:00 P.M. City Hall – 6131 Taylorsville Road – City Council Chambers Meeting Started at 6:00pm 1. Call Meeting To Order/Roll Call: Members present: Bryan Detty, Keith Hensley, Vicki Dix, Nancy Byrge, Vincent King & Richard Shaw Members NOT present: Toni Webb • Nina Deam was resigned from the Committee 2. Approval of Minutes: No Minutes to Approval 3. Topics of Discussion: A. City Dog Park Planning and Discussion • Mr. King mentioned the “Meet Me at the Park” $20,000 Grant campaign. • Mr. Detty mentioned the Lowe’s communication. • Ms. Byrge discussed the March 29, 2018 email (Copy Enclosed) • Mr. Shaw discussed access to a Shared Drive for additional information. • Mr. King shared concerns regarding “Banning” smoking at the park as no park in Huber is currently banned. • Ms. Byrge suggested Benches inside and out of the park area. • Mr. Hensley and the committee discussed in length the optional sizes for the park. • Mr. Detty expressed interest in a limestone entrance area. • Mr. Hensley suggested the 100ft distance from the North line of the Neighbors and the School property line to the South. -
1 1. Species: Mountain Plover (Charadrius Montanus) 2. Status
1. Species: Mountain Plover (Charadrius montanus) 2. Status: Table 1 summarizes the current status of this species or subspecies by various ranking entity and defines the meaning of the status. Table 1. Current status of Charadrius montanus Entity Status Status Definition NatureServe G3 Species is Vulnerable At moderate risk of extinction or elimination due to a fairly restricted range, relatively few populations or occurrences, recent and widespread declines, threats, or other factors. CNHP S2B Species is Imperiled At high risk of extinction or elimination due to restricted range, few populations or occurrences, steep declines, severe threats, or other factors. (B=Breeding) Colorado SGCN, Tier 1 Species of Greatest Conservation Need State List Status USDA Forest R2 Sensitive Region 2 Regional Forester’s Sensitive Species Service USDI FWSb BoCC Included in the USFWS Bird of Conservation Concern list a Colorado Natural Heritage Program. b US Department of Interior Fish and Wildlife Service. The 2012 U.S. Forest Service Planning Rule defines Species of Conservation Concern (SCC) as “a species, other than federally recognized threatened, endangered, proposed, or candidate species, that is known to occur in the plan area and for which the regional forester has determined that the best available scientific information indicates substantial concern about the species' capability to persist over the long-term in the plan area” (36 CFR 219.9). This overview was developed to summarize information relating to this species’ consideration to be listed as a SCC on the Rio Grande National Forest, and to aid in the development of plan components and monitoring objectives. 3. Taxonomy Genus/species Charadrius montanus is accepted as valid (ITIS 2015). -
Discover Denver Survey Report: Capitol Hill-West Cheesman Survey
Discover Denver Know It. Love It. One Building at a Time. Survey Report: Capitol Hill-West Cheesman Survey Area Prepared by: Kathleen Corbett, Ph.D. Architectural Historian Corbett AHS, Inc. and Beth Glandon Director, Discover Denver Historic Denver, Inc. State Historical Fund Grant #16-01-021 December 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Discover Denver Overview.................................................................................................................... 1 Project Purpose ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Project History ...................................................................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction: Capitol Hill-West Cheesman Survey ............................................................................... 3 2. Project Area .......................................................................................................................................... 4 3. Research Design and Methods ............................................................................................................. 6 Survey Objectives and Scope of Work .................................................................................................. 6 Survey Exclusions .................................................................................................................................. 7 Project Participants .............................................................................................................................. -
Copyrighted Material
American Express (Denver), 56 Arts and crafts Index America the Beautiful Access Boulder, 152 Pass, 36 Colorado Springs, 212 See also Accommodations and America the Beautiful Senior Denver, 104–105 Restaurant indexes, below. Pass, 36–37 Art Source International Amtrak, 31, 32 (Boulder), 152 Denver, 50 Arvada Center for the Arts & Andrew J. Macky Gallery Humanities (Denver), 114 General Index (Boulder), 145 Asian community (Denver), 52 A Angie Star Jewelry (Boulder), Ask-A-Nurse Centura, 56 153 Aspenglen campground (Rocky AAA (American Automobile Anglers All (Denver), 98 Mountain National Park), 168 Association) GENERAL INDEX Angler's Covey (Colorado Astor House Museum (Golden), Boulder, 126 Springs), 208 116 Colorado Springs, 178 Antique Emporium at Manitou A Taste of Colorado (Denver), 26 Denver, 55 Springs, 211 Atencio, John (Denver), 107 A&A Historical Trails Stables, 121 Antique Row (Denver), 104 ATMs (automated-teller AARP, 36 Antiques machines), 33–34 Academy Boulevard (Colorado Colorado Springs, 211 Australia Springs), 178 Denver, 104 customs regulations, 28 Academy Riding Stables Applejack Wine & Spirits embassy of, 229 (Colorado Springs), 209 (Denver), 106 passports, 231 Accommodations. See also Aquarium, Downtown visas, 232 Accommodations Index (Denver), 90 Auto racing best, 4–6 Arapahoe Park (Aurora), 103 Colorado Springs, 210 Boulder, 128–134 Arcade Amusements (Manitou Denver, 102–103 Cañon City, 220–221 Springs), 207 Pueblo, 227 Colorado Springs, 180–187 Area codes, 22, 56 Denver, 57–67 Boulder, 127 eco-friendly, 37–38 Colorado -
Principles and Practices for Restoration of Ponderosa Pine and Dry Mixed
United States Department of Agriculture Principles and Practices for the Restoration of Ponderosa Pine and Dry Mixed-Conifer Forests of the Colorado Front Range Robert N. Addington, Gregory H. Aplet, Mike A. Battaglia, Jennifer S. Briggs, Peter M. Brown, Antony S. Cheng, Yvette Dickinson, Jonas A. Feinstein, Kristen A. Pelz, Claudia M. Regan, Jim Thinnes, Rick Truex, Paula J. Fornwalt, Benjamin Gannon, Chad W. Julian, Jeffrey L. Underhill, Brett Wolk Forest Rocky Mountain General Technical Report Service Research Station RMRS-GTR-373 January 2018 Addington, Robert N.; Aplet, Gregory H.; Battaglia, Mike A.; Briggs, Jennifer S.; Brown, Peter M.; Cheng, Antony S.; Dickinson, Yvette; Feinstein, Jonas A.; Pelz, Kristen A.; Regan, Claudia M.; Thinnes, Jim; Truex, Rick; Fornwalt, Paula J.; Gannon, Benjamin; Julian, Chad W.; Underhill, Jeffrey L.; Wolk, Brett. 2018. Principles and practices for the restoration of ponderosa pine and dry mixed-conifer forests of the Colorado Front Range. RMRS-GTR-373. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 121 p. Abstract Wildfires have become larger and more severe over the past several decades on Colorado’s Front Range, catalyzing greater investments in forest management intended to mitigate wildfire risks.The complex ecological, social, and political context of the Front Range, however, makes forest management challenging, especially where multiple management goals including forest restoration exist. In this report, we present a science-based framework for managers to develop place-based approaches to forest restoration of Front Range ponderosa pine and dry mixed-conifer forests. We first present ecological information describing how Front Range forest structure and composition are shaped at multiple scales by interactions among topography, natural disturbances such as fire, and forest developmental processes. -
PEAK to PRAIRIE: BOTANICAL LANDSCAPES of the PIKES PEAK REGION Tass Kelso Dept of Biology Colorado College 2012
!"#$%&'%!(#)()"*%+'&#,)-#.%.#,/0-#!"0%'1%&2"%!)$"0% !"#$%("3)',% &455%$6758% /69:%8;%+<878=>% -878?4@8%-8776=6% ABCA% Kelso-Peak to Prairie Biodiversity and Place: Landscape’s Coat of Many Colors Mountain peaks often capture our imaginations, spark our instincts to explore and conquer, or heighten our artistic senses. Mt. Olympus, mythological home of the Greek gods, Yosemite’s Half Dome, the ever-classic Matterhorn, Alaska’s Denali, and Colorado’s Pikes Peak all share the quality of compelling attraction that a charismatic alpine profile evokes. At the base of our peak along the confluence of two small, nondescript streams, Native Americans gathered thousands of years ago. Explorers, immigrants, city-visionaries and fortune-seekers arrived successively, all shaping in turn the region and communities that today spread from the flanks of Pikes Peak. From any vantage point along the Interstate 25 corridor, the Colorado plains, or the Arkansas River Valley escarpments, Pikes Peak looms as the dominant feature of a diverse “bioregion”, a geographical area with a distinct flora and fauna, that stretches from alpine tundra to desert grasslands. “Biodiversity” is shorthand for biological diversity: a term covering a broad array of contexts from the genetics of individual organisms to ecosystem interactions. The news tells us daily of ongoing threats from the loss of biodiversity on global and regional levels as humans extend their influence across the face of the earth and into its sustaining processes. On a regional level, biologists look for measures of biodiversity, celebrate when they find sites where those measures are high and mourn when they diminish; conservation organizations and in some cases, legal statutes, try to protect biodiversity, and communities often struggle to balance human needs for social infrastructure with desirable elements of the natural landscape. -
Denudation History and Internal Structure of the Front Range and Wet Mountains, Colorado, Based on Apatite-Fission-Track Thermoc
NEW MEXICO BUREAU OF GEOLOGY & MINERAL RESOURCES, BULLETIN 160, 2004 41 Denudation history and internal structure of the Front Range and Wet Mountains, Colorado, based on apatitefissiontrack thermochronology 1 2 1Department of Earth and Environmental Science, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801Shari A. Kelley and Charles E. Chapin 2New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801 Abstract An apatite fissiontrack (AFT) partial annealing zone (PAZ) that developed during Late Cretaceous time provides a structural datum for addressing questions concerning the timing and magnitude of denudation, as well as the structural style of Laramide deformation, in the Front Range and Wet Mountains of Colorado. AFT cooling ages are also used to estimate the magnitude and sense of dis placement across faults and to differentiate between exhumation and faultgenerated topography. AFT ages at low elevationX along the eastern margin of the southern Front Range between Golden and Colorado Springs are from 100 to 270 Ma, and the mean track lengths are short (10–12.5 µm). Old AFT ages (> 100 Ma) are also found along the western margin of the Front Range along the Elkhorn thrust fault. In contrast AFT ages of 45–75 Ma and relatively long mean track lengths (12.5–14 µm) are common in the interior of the range. The AFT ages generally decrease across northwesttrending faults toward the center of the range. The base of a fossil PAZ, which separates AFT cooling ages of 45– 70 Ma at low elevations from AFT ages > 100 Ma at higher elevations, is exposed on the south side of Pikes Peak, on Mt. -
Fishing Report
COLORADO PARKS & WILDLIFE Fishing ReportFishing Regulations Friday March 23rd, 2018 Review News and Information CPW accepts check for $29 million grant from U.S. Department of the Interior Colorado Parks and Wildlife Director Bob Broscheid on Tuesday, March 20, accepted a check for $29 million from the U.S. Department of Interior, declaring the funding “critical to CPW’s efforts for wildlife conservation, research, habitat preservation” as well as for supporting hunting and fishing programs. Invasive mussels knocking on Colorado's door prompts Highline Lake to revise boat ramp rules Beginning April 1, Colorado Parks and Wildlife will lock the boat ramp each evening at Highline Lake State Park, or when Aquatic Nuisance Species inspectors are not available. The new rule is in response to the growing threat posed to Colorado's water by the few boaters suspected of illegally launching their watercraft without the required aquatic nuisance species inspection. Anglers can provide input at two CPW 'State of the Fish" meetings in Summit, Grand counties In continuing efforts to engage the public in constructive conversations, Colorado Parks and Wildlife will hold two 'State of the Fish' gatherings in Summit and Grand County later this month. Agency biologists and managers will be available to answer questions about the current status of local fisheries, and future management plans. Go fish! 2018 fishing licenses are available now, valid beginning April 1 Colorado Parks and Wildlife reminds anglers that it's time to get ready for another season of fishing. Coloradans and non-resident visitors can purchase a 2018 annual fishing license now either online, at your local CPW office or at any of our hundreds of authorized sales agents statewide. -
Grand County Master Trails Plan
GRAND COUNTY MASTER TRAILS PLAN PREPARED FOR: Headwaters Trails Alliance July, 2015 CONTACT INFORMATION: Headwaters Trails Alliance Meara Michel, Executive Director Phone: 970.726.1013 Email: [email protected] Web: www.headwaterstrails.org HEADWATERS TRAILS ALLIANCE Master Trails Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS GRAND COUNTY MASTER TRAILS PLAN OVERVIEW...............................................................................................................................1 EXISTING PLANS AND DATA..............................................................................................5 HTA MISSION AND GOALS................................................................................................14 OPPORTUNITIES & CONSTRAINTS................................................................................16 SUBAREA PLANS PLANNING SUBAREAS.......................................................................................................19 WINTER PARK/FRASER AREA.........................................................................................20 OVERVIEW.....................................................................................................................20 EXISTING TRAIL CONDITIONS...............................................................................22 STAKEHOLDER OUTREACH SUMMARY..............................................................23 OPPORTUNITIES & CONSTRAINTS........................................................................24 GOALS, OBJECTIVES, & BENCHMARKS..............................................................27 -
CSMMM 2020 Schedule
Colorado Single Molecules and Membranes Meeting – Friday, Jan. 10, 2020 University of Colorado Denver, Auraria Campus 1201 Larimer Street, Denver, Student Commons Building, room 2500 8:45 Coffee and pastries 8:55 Welcome 9:00 Dan Schwartz, CU Boulder Single-molecule studies of antimicrobial peptide interactions with bilayer mimics of bacterial membranes 9:30 Luis Aguilera, Munsky lab, CSU Computational design and interpretation of single-RNA translation experiments 10:00 Michelle Knowles, University of Denver Single Molecule and Cluster Dynamics of SNARE proteins during Membrane Fusion 10:30 Break 10:45 Joe Falke, CU Boulder Regulatory interactions between master kinases on their target membrane surface: PDK, PKB/AKT, and PKC 11:15 Kathrin Spendier, UCCS Imaging Membrane Curvature inside a Model Immunological Synapse 11:30 Guy Hagen, Colorado BioFrontiers center, UCCS Imaging cells and tissues with structured illumination microscopy and Bayesian image reconstruction 11:45 Nara Chon, Lin/Knight labs, CU-Denver Multivalent lipid targeting by the calcium-independent C2A domain of Slp-4/granuphilin 12:00 Blake Hummer, Asensio lab, DU Golga5 recruits the dense core vesicle biogenesis factor HID-1 to the Golgi 12:15 Connor Thompson, Schwartz lab, CU Boulder Cis- and trans- cadherin binding interactions in bilayers 12:30 Lunch and poster session (poster titles on page 2) 2:15 Susanta Sarkar, Colorado School of Mines Allosteric communications between domains modulate activity of matrix metalloprotease-1 2:45 Alan van Orden, CSU A fiber array