DOCSLIB.ORG

Before the Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Before the Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C BEFORE THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, D.C. _______________________________________________ Application of ) ) AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. ) ) Docket FAA-2015-3491 for an exemption ) pursuant to 14 C.F.R. Part 11.15 ) (Lansing, Michigan – Washington, D.C.) ) _______________________________________________ ) REPLY OF AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. TO ANSWER OF JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORPORATION (Lansing, Michigan – Washington, D.C.) Communications with respect to this document should be addressed to: Howard Kass Vice President – Regulatory Affairs Abigail Donovan Director, Congressional and Federal Affairs American Airlines, Inc. 1101 17th Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 326-5153 [email protected] [email protected] October 6, 2015 BEFORE THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, D.C. _______________________________________________ Application of ) ) AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. ) ) Docket FAA-2015-3491 for an exemption ) pursuant to 14 C.F.R. Part 11.15 ) (Lansing, Michigan – Washington, D.C.) ) _______________________________________________ ) REPLY OF AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. TO ANSWER OF JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORPORATION (Lansing, Michigan – Washington, D.C.) American hereby replies to the Answer of JetBlue Airways Corporation (“JetBlue Answer”) of September 17, 2015.1 When the rhetoric and bravado are taken out of the JetBlue Answer, it is clear that JetBlue has missed the point. The question before FAA is: does the public interest demand that FAA preserve Lansing, Michigan’s Capital Region International Airport (“LAN”) and Mid-Michigan’s air service to Washington, D.C.? The answer to that question is an unqualified YES!2 As LAN and the Mid-Michigan region have made clear, the best result is the immediate grant of an exemption to American.3 Indeed, the LAN community has amply demonstrated its enthusiasm for American service, by providing: 1 American requests leave from FAA and the Department of Transportation (“Department” or “DOT”) to file this Reply after the seven business day time limit for replies contained in 14 CFR §§ 302.308 and 302.8. The JetBlue Answer was not posted in the online docket until September 28, 2015, and JetBlue did not provide American with a copy of the Answer it filed. Thus, in the interest of a complete record, FAA/DOT should grant American’s request. 2 JetBlue’s Answer barely mentions the concerns of LAN and Mid-Michigan. Instead, JetBlue attempts to make the proceeding about JetBlue and its DCA aspirations. 3 Contrary to JetBlue’s assertions, granting American the right to provide LAN-DCA service is not in any way barred by the Settlement Agreement between American and the Department of Justice (“DOJ”). Indeed, as evidenced by American’s agreement with DOT on using DCA slots for small community service, American’s proposal is wholly-consistent with providing a small community access to Washington. 1 Multiple pleadings and letters from Lansing’s Capital Region Airport Authority (“CRAA”) in support of American;4 An economic impact analysis by Trillion Aviation, Inc. showing the substantial economic benefits American would provide;5 A formal resolution from the CRAA Board of Directors supporting the American service as providing the greatest economic benefits;6 Support for American service from federal, state, regional, and local political leaders;7 Support for American service from a wide range of businesses, as well as many regional and local business associations;8 Support for American service from Michigan State University, with over 50,000 students, and the Facility for Rare Isotope Beams, funded by the U.S. Department of Energy;9 and Over 1,000 letters in support of American from citizens who want a new travel option at LAN.10 The FAA should recognize the community’s desire for American’s service proposal and immediately grant American an exemption for LAN-DCA service. I. THE SUN COUNTRY EXEMPTION WAS GRANTED SPECIFICALLY TO PRESERVE LAN-DCA SERVICE UNDER FAA’S AUTHORITY TO ACT IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST JetBlue’s Answer contorts a series of FAA, DOT and DOJ pronouncements to support its view that, rather than protect LAN air service, the government should institute a slot proceeding to use the LAN slots for a different community. Unfortunately for JetBlue, that proceeding already occurred and JetBlue lost.11 4 See Comments of the Capital Region Airport Authority in Support of the Application of American Airlines, Inc. for an Exemption, August 17, 2015, Docket FAA-2015-3491 (“CRAA Comments”); Additional Comments of the Capital Region Airport Authority in Support of the Application of American Airlines, Inc. for an Exemption, September 24, 2015, Docket FAA-2015-3491 (“Additional CRAA Comments”); and Second Additional Comments of the Capital Region Airport Authority in Support of the Application of American Airlines, Inc. for an Exemption, October 6, 2015, Docket FAA-2015-3491. 5 See “LAN-DCA Route Analysis”, Trillion Aviation, Inc., September 18, 2015 (“Trillion Economic Analysis”), p.4. 6 See Capital Region Airport Authority Resolution # 15-27, September 23, 2015, attached to Additional CRAA Comments. 7 See Additional CRAA Comments, p. 2. 8 Id. 9 Id. 10 Id. 11 See Motion for Leave to File an Otherwise Unauthorized Document and Additional Comments of American Airlines, Inc., April 4, 2014, Docket DOT-OST-2000-7182, p. 1-2. 2 JetBlue then ignores FAA’s fundamental reason for issuing Exemption 10466 to Sun Country – to protect LAN-DCA service for a small community that has come to rely on it. As JetBlue well knows – because it opposed Sun Country at every turn12 – an exemption was granted to Sun Country because FAA determined that preserving LAN-DCA service was in the public interest. Under 49 U.S.C. § 41718, DOT has specific authority to grant exemptions to provide increased market access at DCA. However, this authority does not override FAA’s authority under 49 U.S.C. § 40109 to grant exemptions from its rules when those exemptions are in the public interest.13 In its analysis, FAA stated it “must weigh… the public benefits from the existing DCA- LAN service.”14 Specifically, FAA stated that the loss of LAN-DCA service “could detrimentally impact the traveling public”;15 and that preservation of Sun Country’s service presented the same public interest in preserving existing DCA service as the exemption FAA granted to Air Canada.16 These statements by FAA remain true today, and that is all American wants to do – protect existing air service at LAN. The Sun Country Exemption exists solely for LAN-DCA 12 See Letter of JetBlue to FAA, February 10, 2012, Docket FAA-2012-0089. In arguing against the grant of an exemption to Sun Country, JetBlue challenged Sun Country’s reliance on Air Canada’s Exemption No. 10063 as justification for FAA granting an exemption when a carrier loses its slots through no fault of its own. Now, however, in arguing against an award of an exemption to American, JetBlue relies on Exemption No. 10063 for the proposition that FAA has approved exemption requests “only to redress the loss of a slot allocation that was beyond the carrier’s control.” (See JetBlue Answer, p. 2-3.) 13 Exemption No. 10466, March 2, 2012, Docket FAA-2012-0089 (“Sun Country Exemption”), p. 3. 14 Id., at 4. 15 Id., at 3. 16 See Exemption No. 10063, May 10, 2010, Docket FAA-2010-0101 (“Air Canada Exemption”). FAA also found that “[g]iven the unusual circumstances presented”, it was in the public interest to preserve LAN-DCA air service. (Compare Air Canada Exemption, p. 3 (FAA acknowledges the “unusual circumstances presented” made it in the public interest to preserve the existing DCA services offered by Air Canada).) Indeed, it is when such “unusual circumstances” exist that FAA is most correct to exercise its statutory authority under 49 U.S.C. § 40109 to issue an exemption based on the public interest. 3 service,17 and only granting an exemption to American will preserve the DCA service to LAN and the Mid-Michigan region that FAA previously determined was in the public interest. II. THE RECISSION LANGUAGE CONTAINED IN THE SUN COUNTRY EXEMPTION DOES NOT PREVENT ISSUANCE OF A NEW EXEMPTION TO AMERICAN JetBlue repeatedly states that the Sun Country Exemption was exclusive to Sun Country under its terms, and that this capacity cannot be reallocated to another carrier.18 However, JetBlue selectively applies past FAA precedent.19 Culminating with Exemption No. 8112, FAA has, in fact, issued exemptions irrespective of recission language in the original exemption.20 In each case, when a carrier was no longer operating the DCA flights authorized by an exemption, FAA issued new exemptions for operations, notwithstanding language in the old exemption regarding rescission of the exemption in the event a carrier ceased service. FAA also circumvented recission language by terminating the exemption no longer being used and issuing a new exemption for operations in Exemptions 8112, 7370 and 5153. In the same manner, FAA can comply with any rescission language by cancelling the Sun Country Exemption and issuing American a new exemption for LAN-DCA service. 17 Contrary to JetBlue’s allegations that American is trying to use a backdoor mechanism to expand its slot holdings beyond the limitations of the High Density Rule, American has been clear that it merely wants to replace Sun Country on the LAN-DCA route. Indeed, the American Application even requested that, in the alternative to issuing a new exemption, the FAA simply amend the exemption to list American or American Eagle in place of Sun Country. (See American Application, p. 2, fn 1). 18 See JetBlue Answer, p. 2 and 5 19 JetBlue’s assertion that FAA’s 2012 issuance of an exemption to Sun Country does not constitute precedent, but that the older 2010 and 2003 exemptions it cites are valid precedent, is ridiculous. 20 See Exemption No. 5153, January 12, 1990, Docket 26101 (issuing an exemption to America West for four flights previously operated by Braniff, despite the previous Braniff exemption including the provision that “the exemption would be rescinded if Braniff ceased scheduled operations at National Airport.”).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appendix 25 Box 31/3 Airline Codes
    March 2021 APPENDIX 25 BOX 31/3 AIRLINE CODES The information in this document is provided as a guide only and is not professional advice, including legal advice. It should not be assumed that the guidance is comprehensive or that it provides a definitive answer in every case. Appendix 25 - SAD Box 31/3 Airline Codes March 2021 Airline code Code description 000 ANTONOV DESIGN BUREAU 001 AMERICAN AIRLINES 005 CONTINENTAL AIRLINES 006 DELTA AIR LINES 012 NORTHWEST AIRLINES 014 AIR CANADA 015 TRANS WORLD AIRLINES 016 UNITED AIRLINES 018 CANADIAN AIRLINES INT 020 LUFTHANSA 023 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. (CARGO) 027 ALASKA AIRLINES 029 LINEAS AER DEL CARIBE (CARGO) 034 MILLON AIR (CARGO) 037 USAIR 042 VARIG BRAZILIAN AIRLINES 043 DRAGONAIR 044 AEROLINEAS ARGENTINAS 045 LAN-CHILE 046 LAV LINEA AERO VENEZOLANA 047 TAP AIR PORTUGAL 048 CYPRUS AIRWAYS 049 CRUZEIRO DO SUL 050 OLYMPIC AIRWAYS 051 LLOYD AEREO BOLIVIANO 053 AER LINGUS 055 ALITALIA 056 CYPRUS TURKISH AIRLINES 057 AIR FRANCE 058 INDIAN AIRLINES 060 FLIGHT WEST AIRLINES 061 AIR SEYCHELLES 062 DAN-AIR SERVICES 063 AIR CALEDONIE INTERNATIONAL 064 CSA CZECHOSLOVAK AIRLINES 065 SAUDI ARABIAN 066 NORONTAIR 067 AIR MOOREA 068 LAM-LINHAS AEREAS MOCAMBIQUE Page 2 of 19 Appendix 25 - SAD Box 31/3 Airline Codes March 2021 Airline code Code description 069 LAPA 070 SYRIAN ARAB AIRLINES 071 ETHIOPIAN AIRLINES 072 GULF AIR 073 IRAQI AIRWAYS 074 KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES 075 IBERIA 076 MIDDLE EAST AIRLINES 077 EGYPTAIR 078 AERO CALIFORNIA 079 PHILIPPINE AIRLINES 080 LOT POLISH AIRLINES 081 QANTAS AIRWAYS
    [Show full text]
  • Airline Schedules
    Airline Schedules This finding aid was produced using ArchivesSpace on January 08, 2019. English (eng) Describing Archives: A Content Standard Special Collections and Archives Division, History of Aviation Archives. 3020 Waterview Pkwy SP2 Suite 11.206 Richardson, Texas 75080 [email protected]. URL: https://www.utdallas.edu/library/special-collections-and-archives/ Airline Schedules Table of Contents Summary Information .................................................................................................................................... 3 Scope and Content ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Series Description .......................................................................................................................................... 4 Administrative Information ............................................................................................................................ 4 Related Materials ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Controlled Access Headings .......................................................................................................................... 5 Collection Inventory ....................................................................................................................................... 6 - Page 2 - Airline Schedules Summary Information Repository:
    [Show full text]
  • Taxation of Fractional Programs: Flying Over Uncharted Waters Philip E
    Journal of Air Law and Commerce Volume 67 | Issue 2 Article 3 2002 Taxation of Fractional Programs: Flying Over Uncharted Waters Philip E. Crowther Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc Recommended Citation Philip E. Crowther, Taxation of Fractional Programs: Flying Over Uncharted Waters, 67 J. Air L. & Com. 241 (2002) https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc/vol67/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Air Law and Commerce by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. TAXATION OF FRACTIONAL PROGRAMS: "FLYING OVER UNCHARTED WATERS" PHILIP E. CROWTHER* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .................................. 243 A. GENERAL DESIGN OF THE PROGRAM ............. 243 1. The Basic Agreements ........................ 243 2. General Principles ........................... 244 3. Operation of the Program..................... 246 4. Economic Analysis of the Program............. 249 5. Tax Analysis of the Program ................. 251 II. FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION TAX .............. 251 A. THE GENERAL RULES ........................... 251 1. The Transportation Tax ..................... 251 2. Taxation of Use of Own Aircraft .............. 256 3. Taxation of Joint Ownership Agreement ....... 261 4. Taxation of Dry Lease Exchange .............. 262 B. CHARACTERIZATION OF FRACTIONAL PROGRAMS.. 264 1. The FractionalCompany Rulings ............. 264 2. Executive Jet Aviation ........................ 267 3. Critique..................................... 270 C. CONSEQUENCES AND REMAINING ISSUES ......... 278 III. INCOME TAX ISSUES ............................. 279 A. THE GENERAL RULES ........................... 279 1. The Income Tax ............................. 279 * Attorney, Law Offices of Phil Crowther, a Kansas legal practice limited to aviation business and tax law. From 1986 to 1999, he was the Tax Manager and Assistant Treasurer at Cessna Aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Analysis of the Jetblue Airways Valentine’S Day 2007 Crisis
    REGAINING ALTITUDE: A CASE ANALYSIS OF THE JETBLUE AIRWAYS VALENTINE’S DAY 2007 CRISIS Gregory G. Efthimiou A thesis submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Mass Communication in The School of Journalism and Mass Communication. Chapel Hill 2008 Approved by: Elizabeth Dougall Janas Sinclair Richard Blackburn i © 2008 Gregory G. Efthimiou ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT GREGORY EFTHIMIOU: Regaining Altitude: A Case Analysis of the JetBlue Airways Valentine’s Day 2007 Crisis (Under the direction of Elizabeth Dougall, Janas Sinclair, Richard Blackburn) Valentine’s Day 2007 changed the course of history for JetBlue Airways. The upstart low-fare airline – which had enjoyed unprecedented acclaim from customers and industry observers since its launch in 2000 – suddenly found itself in the midst of a major operational catastrophe. A winter storm that enveloped the New York metropolitan region and JetBlue’s hub at John F. Kennedy International Airport left hundreds of the company’s passengers stranded aboard planes on the tarmac, some for as many as ten hours. Hundreds more waited in vain in the terminal for flights that the airline would eventually cancel. The flight disruptions at JFK plunged JetBlue’s entire operation into chaos, forcing the carrier to cancel more than one thousand flights over a six day period. This thesis project describes the corporate crisis communication measures implemented by JetBlue Airways to repair its reputation. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author would like to extend his heartfelt gratitude to the members of his thesis project committee for their involvement and encouragement.
    [Show full text]
  • Competitive Impact Statement: U.S. V. American Airlines, Inc. and Robert L
    .. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CA3-83-0325-D ) AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC . , and ) ROBERT L. CRANDALL , ) ) Defendants . ) COMPETITIVE IMPACT STATEMENT Pursuant to Section 2(b) of the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 15 u.s .c. §16(b)-(h), the United States files this Competitive Impact Statement relating to the proposed Final Judgment submi tted for entry in this civil antitrust proceeding. I . Nature and Purpose of the Proceeding On February 23, 1983, the United States filed a civil antitrust Complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas under Section 4 of the Sherman Act (15 u.s .c . §4) to enjoin defendants, .American Airlines, Inc . and Robert L. Crandall from continuing or renewing violations of §2 of the Sherman Act as amended (15 u.s.c. §2). The defendant American Airlines, Inc . (hereinafter "American") is a wholly-owned subsidiary of AMR Corporation and is in the principal business of providing scheduled airline passenger and freight services. American ' s principal business office is located in Fort Worth, Texas. The defendant Robert L. Crandall at the time of the Complaint was president of American . Defendant Crandall is currently Chairman of American's Board of Directors and is American ' s chief executive . His office is located at American's headquarters in Fort Worth. The Complaint alleges that on or about February l, 1982, the defendants, American and Robert L. Crandall, unlawfully attempted joint and collusive monopolization between American and Braniff Airways, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Year in Review Just Like Our Runways Enable Flight, Our Success Has Helped Enable This Region to Soar
    Our Mission The mission of the Hillsborough County Aviation Authority is to be a major driver in the economic growth of the Tampa Bay region. The Hillsborough County Aviation Authority will be a leading edge innovator to create global access and world class customer service to build prosperity for its stakeholders. Our Vision The vision of the Hillsborough County Aviation Authority is to be a thriving aviation gateway for the Tampa Bay region, providing global access and economic opportunity for its stakeholders. Our Strategic Objectives • Customer Service Excellence • Growth and Financial Strength • Community and Employee Engagement • Safety and Security • Innovation and Process Improvement 01 A Message from the Chairman ake a glance around the Transfer Level of the Main Terminal and you can see what this year was all Tabout. Record numbers of passengers come and go through a bright beautiful new space replete with comfortable seating and world-class amenities. New airlines and destinations dot our arrivals and departures screens. Patrons peruse our shops looking for locally-made gifts or swing by one of our many restaurants for a quick bite or a final opportunity to savor the last moments of a memorable trip. In 2018, we brought a new caliber of guest experience to upgraded their rating. These ratings place us among the our more than 21 million guests. most fiscally sound airports in the country. We did this while maintaining our focus on financial Every year that I have been at the helm of the Hillsborough strength and on the careful stewardship of one of Tampa County Aviation Authority I have had the privilege of Bay’s true community gems.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Studies Series a History of the Civil Reserve
    RESEARCH STUDIES SERIES A HISTORY OF THE CIVIL RESERVE AIR FLEET By Theodore Joseph Crackel Air Force History & Museums Program Washington, D.C., 1998 ii PREFACE This is the second in a series of research studies—historical works that were not published for various reasons. Yet, the material contained therein was deemed to be of enduring value to Air Force members and scholars. These works were minimally edited and printed in a limited edition to reach a small audience that may find them useful. We invite readers to provide feedback to the Air Force History and Museums Program. Dr. Theodore Joseph Crackel, completed this history in 1993, under contract to the Military Airlift Command History Office. Contract management was under the purview of the Center for Air Force History (now the Air Force History Support Office). MAC historian Dr. John Leland researched and wrote Chapter IX, "CRAF in Operation Desert Shield." Rooted in the late 1930s, the CRAF story revolved about two points: the military requirements and the economics of civil air transportation. Subsequently, the CRAF concept crept along for more than fifty years with little to show for the effort, except for a series of agreements and planning documents. The tortured route of defining and redefining of the concept forms the nucleus of the this history. Unremarkable as it appears, the process of coordination with other governmental agencies, the Congress, aviation organizations, and individual airlines was both necessary and unavoidable; there are lessons to be learned from this experience. Although this story appears terribly short on action, it is worth studying to understand how, when, and why the concept failed and finally succeeded.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Line Pilots Association, International Laser Attacks Page 21
    November 2015 ALSO IN THIS ISSUE: » ALPA Testifies » What to Know About » Endeavor Air Pilot Before Congress on Hypertension Moonlights in the Air UAS page 32 page 30 NFL page 34 Line PilOt Stopping Official Journal of the Air Line Pilots Association, International Laser Attacks Page 21 FedEx, Sun Country Pilots Approve Tentative Agreements Page 12 PRINTED IN THE U.S.A. Follow us on Twitter @wearealpa Airline Career Pilot Program Program Includes ê Private, Instrument, Commercial Multi & AIRLINE CAREER Certifi ed Flight Instructor (Single, Multi & Instrument) PILOT PROGRAM LOCATIONS ê 230 Hours Flight Time / 40 Multi ê Guaranteed Flight Instructor Job Boeing 737-NG Airline Sponsored Career Track Type Rating Program ê Graduate training in 6 months and fl ight instruct with ATP Program Includes ê Interview with an airline at 500 hours ê Manuals, Cockpit Panels, and Study Guides ê Commit and start earning tuition reimbursement ê Systems Ground Instruction ê Fly for your airline in just 2 years after starting training ê Full Flight Simulator Training (FFS) with Partner ê Check ATPFlightSchool.com for more participating airlines ê Line Oriented Flight Training (LOFT) with Partner ê FAA Oral Examination by On-Staff Training Center Evaluator (TCE) $ month Self-Paced & Housing 59,995 FAST TRACK Options Available $ Full Financing Available | Tuition Reimbursement 14,495 / 13 Days Full Financing Available Get Started with an Intro Training Flight Learn why ATP is your pilot career solution. ATPFlightSchool.com/intro ATPFlightSchool.com All prices offered through November 30, 2015. Check ATPFlightSchool.com for details and eligibility requirements. Call or text (872) 215-2877 2015-10-ATP-ALPA-FP.indd 1 9/17/15 8:38 AM NOVEMBER2015CONTENTS VOLUME 84, NUMBER 9 COMMENTARY 24 5 OUR UNION Democracy Is the Core of Discovery 6 WEIGHING IN Preparing for ALPA’s Tomorrow FEATURES 21 STOPPING LASER ATTACKS ON AIRCRAFT: NO SHOT IN THE DARK ABOUT THE COVER 24 ALPA PILOTS TAKE A Sun Country B-737NG on final PART IN FIRST-EVER approach to St.
    [Show full text]
  • This Is the Us Master Pilot Scablist the Unionist's Edition
    THIS IS THE US MASTER PILOT SCABLIST THE UNIONIST’S EDITION A SCAB is A Person Who is Doing What You’d be Doing if You Weren’t on Strike. A SCAB takes your job, a Job he could not get under normal circumstances. He can only advance himself by taking advantage of labor disputes and walking over the backs of workers trying to maintain decent wages and working conditions. He helps management to destroy his and your profession, often ending up under conditions he/she wouldn't even have scabbed for. No matter. A SCAB doesn't think long term, nor does he think of anything other then himself. His smile shows fangs that drip with your blood, for he willingly destroys families, lives, careers, opportunities and professions at the drop of a hat. He takes from a striker what he knows he could never earn by his own merit: a decent Job. He steals that which others earned at the bargaining table through blood, sweat and tears, and throws it away in an instant - ruining lives, jobs and careers. ONCE A SCAB, ALWAYS A SCAB - NEVER FORGET! Below are brief notes about legal strikes by organized pilots. 1. Century Airlines 1932: Pilots struck to resist wage reduction by E.L Cord, the patron saint of Frank Lorenzo. 2. TWA 1946: Pilots struck over pay on faster 4 engine aircraft, limited by the provisions of Decision 83. 3. National Airlines 1948: Strike over aircraft safety and repeated violations of the labor contract. 4. Western Airlines 1958: Qualifications of the Flight Engineer.
    [Show full text]
  • Fsd Mar93.Pdf
    During Adverse Conditions, Decelerating to Stop Demands More from Crew and Aircraft Hydroplaning, gusting cross winds and mechanical failures are only a few of the factors that contribute to runway overrun accidents and incidents after landing or rejecting a takeoff. Improvements in tire design, runway construction and aircraft systems reduce risks, but crew training remains the most important tool to stop safely. by Jack L. King Aviation Consultant Decelerating an aircraft to a stop on a runway traction during wet-weather operations and can become significantly more critical in ad- the use of anti-skid braking devices, coupled verse conditions, such as heavy rain in mar- with high-pressure tires, has reduced greatly ginal visibility with gusting cross winds. Add the risk of hydroplaning. Still, accident and the surprise of a malfunction, which requires incident statistics confirm that several major a high-speed rejected takeoff (RTO) or a con- runway overrun accidents each year are caused trolled stop after a touchdown on a slightly by unsuccessful braking involving either a high- flooded runway, and a flight crew is challenged speed landing or an RTO on a wet runway to prevent an off-runway excursion. surface; the factors involved in decelerating to a controlled stop are very similar in these Research findings and technological advances two situations. in recent years have helped alleviate, but not eliminate, the hazards associated with takeoff Overrun Accidents and landing in adverse weather. The U.S. Na- tional Aeronautics and Space Administration Continue to Occur (NASA) and the U.S. Federal Aviation Admin- istration (FAA) conducted specialized tests on A recent Boeing Company study reported that tire spin-up speeds after touchdown rather than during 30 years of jet transport service there spin-down speeds in rollout that confirm that have been 48 runway overrun accidents with hydroplaning occurs at substantially lower more than 400 fatalities resulting from RTOs speeds than noted previously.
    [Show full text]
  • RCED-90-147 Airline Competition
    All~lISI l!t!)o AIRLINE COMPETITION Industry Operating and Marketing Practices Limit Market Entry -- ~~Ao//I~(::I’:I~-~o-lri7 ---- “._ - . -...- .. ..._ __ _ ..”._._._.__ _ .““..ll.l~,,l__,*” _~” _.-. Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division B-236341 August 29,lQQO The Honorable John C. Danforth Ranking Minority Member, Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation United States Senate The Honorable Jack Brooks Chairman, Committee on the Judiciary House of Representatives In response your requests, this report provides information on how various airline industry operating and marketing practices limit entry into the deregulated airline industry and how they affect competition in that industry. Specifically, we identified two major types of . barriers. The first type is created by the unavailability of the airport facilities and operating rights an airline must have in order to begin or expand service at an airport. The second type is created by airline marketing practices that have come into widespread use since deregulation. As agreed with your offices, unless you publicly announce its contents earlier, we plan no further distribution of this report until 30 days from the date of this letter. At that time, we will send copies to the Secretary of the Department of Transportation; the Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration; and interested congressional committees. We will also make copies available to others upon request. If you have any questions about this report, please contact me at (202) 276-1000. Major contributors to this report are listed in appendix XIII. Kenneth M. Mead Director, Transportation Issues . , Executive Summary When the Congress passed the Airline Deregulation Act in 1978, it Purpose sought to foster competition so as to promote lower fares and good ser- vice.
    [Show full text]
  • Case 3 the US Airline Industry in 2007
    CTAC03 4/13/07 17:21 Page 26 case 3 The US Airline Industry in 2007 Here’s a list of 129 airlines that in the past 20 years filed for bankruptcy. Continental was smart enough to make that list twice. As of 1992, in fact – though the picture would have improved since then – the money that had been made since the dawn of aviation by all of this country’s airline companies was zero. Absolutely zero. Sizing all this up, I like to think that if I’d been at Kitty Hawk in 1903 when Orville Wright took off, I would have been farsighted enough, and public- spirited enough – I owed this to future capitalists – to shoot him down. I mean, Karl Marx couldn’t have done as much damage to capitalists as Orville did. WARREN BUFFETT, CHAIRMAN, BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY As they returned to work at the beginning of January 2007, the senior executives of America’s leading airlines experienced a feeling of optimism and joie de vivre that had been largely absent for most of the previous six years. Between 2001 and 2005, the industry had been ravaged by the horror of September 11, 2001 and the raft of new security measures that followed in its wake, by a tripling in the price of jet fuel, and by unprecedented competitive pres- sures from a new generation of low-cost airlines. During this period, the indus- try racked up losses of $35 billion and four of the countries six biggest airlines were forced into Chapter 11 bankruptcy. Yet, 2006 appeared to be a turning point.
    [Show full text]