The Political Economy of the Film Industry in Tanzania: from Socialism to An

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Political Economy of the Film Industry in Tanzania: from Socialism to An The Political Economy of the Film Industry in Tanzania: From Socialism to an Open Market Economy, 1961–2010 By C2010 Mona Ngusekela Mwakalinga Submitted to the graduate degree program in Film and Media Studies and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Chairperson _____________________ Tamara Falicov __________________________ Michael Baskett __________________________ Catherine Preston __________________________ Peter Ukpokodu ___________________________ Garth Myers Date Defended: i The Dissertation Committee for Mona Ngusekela Mwakalinga certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: The Political Economy of the Film Industry in Tanzania: From Socialism to an Open Market Economy, 1961–2010 Chairperson ________________________ Tamara Falicov Date Approved: ii Acknowledgments Writing a dissertation requires a support system that is there for you throughout the laborious and exciting journey of planning, analyzing, and writing. I could not have accomplished this study without the unconditional support of my chair, Dr. Tamara Falicov. Her passion for the academy has inspired me to become a better scholar and person. My acknowledgment also goes to my committee members, Dr. Michael Baskett, Dr. Peter Ukpokodu, Dr. Catherine Preston, and Dr. Garth Myers, for their insightful and valuable suggestions, which have made this study what it is. My life in the United States and specifically at the University of Kansas would not have been worthwhile without my friends who went out of their way to make my life as a graduate student bearable. Brian Faucette, Baerbel Goebel, Julius Fackler, and Mary Beth Wilson’s love and friendship held me when at times I thought I could not move forward. My thanks also go to Ron Wilson for his generous support in proofreading my work. I’m grateful for the financial support I received from the Fulbright Association, the University of Kansas, and the University of Dar es Salaam, which enabled me to undertake and accomplish the study in a timely manner. My acknowledgment also goes to my numerous interviewees—filmmakers, distributors, and government cultural officials—who were willing to share their experiences, data, and files. Their information has been the pillar of this study. Most importantly, I would not have survived without the unconditional love and support of my friend, comrade, and husband, Ngwa’za Kamata. He inspires me to always quest for knowledge and to remain principled. His love has been my constant. I dedicate this work to my parents Kagunda Lufingo and Uswege Mwakalinga, whose love has been my strength and motivation. iii Abstract This study examines the film industry in Tanzania from the 1960s to 2010 and assesses how government policies, legislation, and cultural institutions have impacted filmmaking in Tanzania. By employing a critical political economy theoretical framework, the study explores succeeding administrations, from President Julius Kambarage Nyerere (1961–1985) to President Mrisho Jakaya Kikwete (2005–present), and reveals cultural mechanisms governments use in controlling the film industry. Through the use of archival information, interviews, and participant observation, the study reveals that despite the social, cultural, economic, political, and ideological shifts that Tanzania has experienced in moving from socialism to capitalism, each administration, using different mechanisms, has retained a strong hold on the film industry. These administrations in advancing their power and legitimacy established cultural institutions and film policies that saw to it that only government-sanctioned images and cultural values were projected to its citizenry. This study reveals that government institutions such as the Government Film Unit (GFU), the Tanzania Film Company (TFC), the Audio Visual Institute (AVI), the National Film Censorship Board (NFCB), the Film and Stage Play Act of 1976, the Cultural Policy, the Cultural Trust Fund, the Copyright Law of 1999, the Copyright Society of Tanzania (COSOTA), and the Zanzibar International Film Festival (ZIFF) were established as mechanisms to control local cultural products as well as the intrusion of foreign cultural products. The policies, legislation, and cultural institutions gave the government the power to influence the opinion of its citizens by dictating what cultural images and identities were permissible. By examining how policies, institutions, and legislation impacted the film industry, an understanding of how governments manipulate and control the cultural/film sector is critically highlighted and addressed in the hope that an alternative, more diversified perspective will emerge. iv Table of Contents Acknowledgments Abstract Chapter One: Introduction 1 Chapter Two: The New Nation: Consolidation, Nation Building, and Film 30 Chapter Three: Rukhsa: Everything Goes? Transition to Neo-Liberal Policy and Film 62 Chapter Four: Uwazi na Ukweli? (Transparency and Truth): Accelerated Neo-liberalism and the Emergence of Diasporic and Video Films 93 Chapter Five: Firming Up Neo-liberalism: Ari Mpya, Nguvu Mpya, na Kasi Mpya and the Transregional/Transnational Video Film Industry 132 Conclusion 176 Bibliography 191 Appendices Names of Interviewees 204 The Cultural Policy Document 210 Video Film Posters 221 v Chapter One Introduction This study explores the film industry in Tanzania from the 1960s to 2010 and assesses how government policies, legislation, and cultural institutions have been used as mechanism of cultural control and thus shaped and impacted filmmaking in Tanzania. An examination of how different administrations, from President Julius Kambarage Nyerere in 1961 to President Mrisho Jakaya Kikwete in 2010, have perceived film production and thus the film industry as a challenge to the neo-liberal narrative of globalization that sees governments as obsolete is made and a critical political economy analytical framework is employed for examining the tools governments use and continue to use in establishing and sustaining their dominance and relevance in the cultural sector. This study examines the social, economic, political, and cultural transformation of Tanzania and discusses how those different paradigms interpenetrate and influence the Tanzanian film industry and further assesses to what extent and with what mechanisms the government controls the film industry. The study reveals complex, antagonistic, and sometime contradictory relations existing between the government and its filmmaking citizens and how that relationship has ushered in alternative modes of film production and exhibition. The Social, Economic, and Political Landscape of Tanzania Like many of Africa’s developing nations, Tanzania attained its political independence in 1961, and like many of the newly formed Third World countries it struggled to form a unified nation. In the endeavor to construct this nation, the newly elected Tanganyika African National Unity (TANU) government under the leadership of President Nyerere established the Ministry of National Culture and Youth in 1962. In his inaugural speech to the parliament on December 10, 1 1962, the president laid out the mission of the ministry: “Culture is the essence and spirit of any nation. Of the crimes of colonialism there is no worse than the attempt to make us believe we had no indigenous culture of our own. So I have set up this new Ministry to help us regain our pride in our culture, I want to seek out the best of the traditions and customs of all our tribes and make them part of our national culture (Nyerere, 1962: 4). In the endeavor to realize a national culture and identity, President Nyerere suppressed all political parties, civil societies, trade unions, and ethnic associations under the pretense that indulging in diverse and multiple organizations would “introduce elements of disunity and retard development” (Shivji, 2006: 37). To further and officially flush out dissidents in 1963, Nyerere announced that Tanganyika would become a one-party state (Coulson 1986: 137); in 1964 Tanganyika and Zanzibar united to form the United Republic of Tanzania; and in 1965 the TANU party declared itself the de facto party, officially making Tanzania a single-party state. In 1967, the government further cemented its authority by officially announcing a socialist manifesto entitled “Socialism and Self-Reliance,” otherwise known as Ujamaa in Kiswahili, which declared socialism as the state ideology and highlighted the steps the nation would take to implement its social, economic, and political development programs. With the socialist ideology thus established, the government became the sole guarantor of the citizen’s general well-being. The government thus had the power to construct and control the thinking pattern of its citizen. According to Jeffery Klaeh, a government gains its power through “ideological conditions that encourage people to believe in their legitimacy and acquiesce to their authority” (2010: 12). The power to narrate and block other narratives from emerging became the preoccupation of the TANU government, and this was cemented through the adoption of the socialism and self- reliance manifesto. 2 Ngumbele-Mwiru notes that the building of socialism can only be ensured when the peasants and workers, by the instruments of their government and cooperatives, control the major means of production and distribution (quoted in Cliffe, 1973: 53). In short, the Tanzanian state,
Recommended publications
  • Just How Nasty Were the Video Nasties? Identifying Contributors of the Video Nasty Moral Panic
    Stephen Gerard Doheny Just how nasty were the video nasties? Identifying contributors of the video nasty moral panic in the 1980s DIPLOMA THESIS submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Magister der Philosophie Programme: Teacher Training Programme Subject: English Subject: Geography and Economics Alpen-Adria-Universität Klagenfurt Evaluator Univ.-Prof. Dr. Jörg Helbig, M.A. Alpen-Adria-Universität Klagenfurt Institut für Anglistik und Amerikanistik Klagenfurt, May 2019 i Affidavit I hereby declare in lieu of an oath that - the submitted academic paper is entirely my own work and that no auxiliary materials have been used other than those indicated, - I have fully disclosed all assistance received from third parties during the process of writing the thesis, including any significant advice from supervisors, - any contents taken from the works of third parties or my own works that have been included either literally or in spirit have been appropriately marked and the respective source of the information has been clearly identified with precise bibliographical references (e.g. in footnotes), - to date, I have not submitted this paper to an examining authority either in Austria or abroad and that - when passing on copies of the academic thesis (e.g. in bound, printed or digital form), I will ensure that each copy is fully consistent with the submitted digital version. I understand that the digital version of the academic thesis submitted will be used for the purpose of conducting a plagiarism assessment. I am aware that a declaration contrary to the facts will have legal consequences. Stephen G. Doheny “m.p.” Köttmannsdorf: 1st May 2019 Dedication I I would like to dedicate this work to my wife and children, for their support and understanding over the last six years.
    [Show full text]
  • Nakala Ya Mtandao (Online Document) 1 BUNGE LA TANZANIA
    Nakala ya Mtandao (Online Document) BUNGE LA TANZANIA ________________ MAJADILIANO YA BUNGE ________________________ MKUTANO WA KUMI NA TANO Kikao cha Kumi na Tisa – Tarehe 27 Mei, 2014 (Mkutano Ulianza Saa tatu Asubuhi) D U A Naibu Spika (Mhe. Job Y. Ndugai) Alisoma Dua HATI ZILIZOWASILISHWA MEZANI Hati Zifuatazo Ziliwasilishwa Mezani na:- NAIBU WAZIRI WA MAMBO YA NJE NA USHIRIKIANO WA KIMATAIFA: Taarifa ya Mwaka na Hesabu za Kituo cha Kimataifa cha Mikutano cha Arusha kwa Mwaka 2012/2013 (The Annual Report and Accounts of Arusha International Conference Centre for the Year 2012/2013). Hotuba ya Bajeti ya Wizara ya Mambo ya Nje na Ushirikiano wa Kimataifa kwa Mwaka wa Fedha 2014/2015. NAIBU WAZIRI WA ARDHI, NYUMBA NA MAENDELEO YA MAKAZI: Hotuba ya Bajeti ya Wizara ya Ardhi, Nyumba na Maendeleo ya Makazi kwa Mwaka wa Fedha 2014/2015. MHE. BETTY E. MACHANGU (K.n.y. MWENYEKITI WA KAMATI YA MAMBO YA NJE NA USHIRIKIANO WA KIMATAIFA): Taarifa ya Mwenyekiti wa Kamati ya Mambo ya Nje na Ushirikiano wa Kimataifa Kuhusu Utekelezaji wa Majukumu ya Wizara ya Mambo ya Nje na Ushirikiano wa Kimataifa kwa Mwaka wa Fedha 2013/2014 na Maoni ya Kamati 1 Nakala ya Mtandao (Online Document) Kuhusu Makadirio ya Mapato na Matumizi ya Wizara hiyo kwa Mwaka wa Fedha 2014/2015. MHE. ABDULKARIM E.H. SHAH (K.n.y. MWENYEKITI WA KAMATI YA ARDHI, MALIASILI NA MAZINGIRA): Taarifa ya Mwenyekiti wa Kamati ya Ardhi, Maliasili na Mazingira Kuhusu Utekelezaji wa Majukumu ya Wizara ya Ardhi, Nyumba na Maendeleo ya Makazi kwa Mwaka wa Fedha 2013/2014 na Maoni ya Kamati Kuhusu Makadirio ya Mapato na Matumizi ya Wizara ya Wizara hiyo kwa Mwaka wa Fedha 2014/2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Governments in Eastern Africa
    LOCAL GOVERNMENTS IN EASTERN AFRICA An analytical Study of Decentralization, Financing, Service Delivery and Capacities LOCAL GOVERNMENTS IN EASTERN AFRICA EASTERN IN GOVERNMENTS LOCAL United Nations Development Programme Photo Credits Cover: From Top left to right 1 UNDP Kenya Consultants/Facilitators: Initiative Consultants Ltd - Margaret Mbuya Jobita, Olando Sitati, John Nyerere, 2 UNDP Kenya Andrea Morara 3 UNDP Kenya Editor: Mizpah Marketing Concepts Design: Purple Sage Page 7: UNDP/Kenya DGTTF Management: Margaret Chi Page 25: UNCDF/Adam Rogers Page 34: UNCDF/Adam Rogers Disclaimer: The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent Page 44: UNDP/Faraja Kihongole those of the United Nations, including UNDP, UNCDF and the Commonwealth Local Government Forum (CLGF). ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The study was commissioned by UNDP in collaboration with UNCDF and CLGF and conducted by a team from Initiative Consultants. The project was led by Rose Akinyi Okoth, Policy Specialist for Local Governance and Local Development, UNDP RSC-ESA with support from Nyasha Simbanegavi, Programme Coordinator for Southern Africa, CLGF and Vincent Hungwe, Regional Technical Advisor for Local Development, UNCDF. Strategic and technical oversight was provided by Siphosami Malunga, Senior Governance Advisor, UNDP, Babatunde Omilola, Practice Team Leader, Poverty Reduction and MDGs, UNDP RSC-ESA, Kodjo Esseim Mensah-Abrampa, Policy Advisor for Local Governance and Local Development, BDP/UNDP and Lucy Slack, Deputy Secretary General, CLGF. Overall guidance was provided by Geraldine Fraser- Moleketi, Director, UNDP, Democratic Governance Group, Bo Asplund, Deputy Director, UNDP Deputy Director, Regional Bureau for Africa and Director, Regional Service Centre for Eastern and Southern Africa, Carl Wright, Secretary General, CLGF; and Kadmiel Wekwete, Senior Adviser for Africa – Local Development Finance, UNCDF.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Innovation
    DEMOCRATIZING IN THE AMERICAS Introduction to Innovation By: Shanae Owen Project Coordinator [email protected] Module 2: Types of Innovation Module 2 – Types Innovations (25 minutes) Types of innovation o -Incremental & Disruptive o -Definition and characteristics Innovation Case Studies - Incremental - Coca Cola (International Example) - Grace (Local Example) o Activity #2: Identifying Incremental Innovations Innovation Case Studies -Disruptive - Netflix vs Blockbuster - Encyclopedia vs Wikipedia o Activity #3: Identifying Disruptive Innovations Module 2 Description In module 2 of the Introduction to Innovation Course, students will explore the 2 main types of innovation currently shaping the world, that is Incremental and Disruptive innovations. Students will also be taken through a series of Jamaican and international examples of these main types of innovations. This module will end with brief case studies of both Incremental and Disruptive innovations. Incremental Innovation is……………. A series of small improvements to an existing product or product line that usually helps maintain or improve its competitive position over time. Incremental innovation is regularly used within the high technology business by companies that need to continue to improve their products to include new features increasingly desired by consumers. -The Business Directory Characteristics of incremental innovation (Product or service) This type of innovation is about improving on the existing It concentrates on solving or responding to the needs of the customer
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the First Joint Annual Meetings
    Economic Commission for Africa African Union Commission Proceedings of the First Joint Annual Meetings African Union Conference of Ministers of Economy and Finance and United Nations Economic Commission for Africa Conference of African Ministers of Finance, Planning and Economic Development 2008 AFRICAN UNION UNITED NATIONS COMMISSION ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COUNCIL ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR AFRICA Forty-first session of the Economic Commission for Africa Third session of CAMEF 31 March – 2 April 2008 • First Joint Annual Meetings of the African Union Conference of Ministers of Economy and Finance and the Economic Commission for Africa Distr.: General Conference of African Ministers of Finance, Planning E/ECA/CM/41/4 and Economic Development AU/CAMEF/MIN/Rpt(III) Date: 10 April 2008 • Commemoration of ECA’s 50th Anniversary Original: English Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Proceedings of the First Joint Annual Meetings of the African Union Conference of Ministers of Economy and Finance and the Conference of African Ministers of Finance, Planning and Economic Development of the United Nations Economic Commission for Africa Proceedings of the First Joint Annual Meetings Contents A. Attendance 1 B. Opening of the Conference and Presidential Reflections 2 C. Election of the Bureau 7 D. High-level thematic debate 7 E. Adoption of the agenda and programme of work 11 F. Account of Proceedings 11 Annex I: A. Resolutions adopted by the Joint Conference 20 B. Ministerial Statement adopted by the Joint Conference 27 C. Solemn Declaration on the 50th Anniversary of the Economic Commission for Africa 33 Annex II: Report of the Committee of Experts of the First Joint Meeting of the AU Conference of Ministers of Economy and Finance and ECA Conference of African Ministers of Finance, Planning and Economic Development 35 E/ECA/CM/41/4 iii AU/CAMEF/MIN/Rpt(III) Proceedings of the First Joint Annual Meetings A.
    [Show full text]
  • Mkapa, Benjamin William
    BENJAMIN WILLIAM MKAPA DCL Mr Chancellor, There’s something familiar about Benjamin Mkapa’s story; a graduate joins a political party with socialist leanings, rises rapidly through the establishment then leads a landslide electoral victory, he focuses on education and helps shift the economy to a successful and stable mixed model. He is popular though he does suffer criticism over his military policy from Clare Short. Then after 10 years he steps down, voluntarily. Tell this story to a British audience and few would think of the name Mkapa. Indeed, if you showed his picture most British people would have no idea who he was. This anonymity and commendable political story are huge achievements for he was a leader of a poor African country that was still under colonial rule less than 50 years ago. He’s not a household name because he did not preside over failure, nor impose dictatorial rule, he did not steal his people’s money or set tribal groups in conflict. He was a good democratic leader, an example in a continent with too few. The potential for failure was substantial. His country of 120 ethnic groups shares borders with Mozambique, Congo, Rwanda and Uganda. It ranks 31st in size in the world, yet 1 when it was redefined in 1920 the national education department had three staff. The defeat of Germany in 1918 ended the conflict in its East African colony and creation of a new British protectorate, Tanganyika. In 1961 the country achieved independence and three years later joined with Zanzibar to create Tanzania.
    [Show full text]
  • And National Economy
    NORDIC WEEK UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA VICE PRESIDENT’S OFFICE ENVIRONMENT WEEK HIGH LEVEL SYMPOSIUM ON CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENT AND NATIONAL ECONOMY 1 June, 2018 H.E. The Vice President of the Republic of Tanzania, Hon. Samia Suluhu Hassan planting a tree in a natural forest reserve established by the late Father of the Nation Mwl. Julius Kambarage Nyerere. This tree planting ceremony happened during the climax of the World Environment Day nationally commemortated in Butiama, 2017. HIGH LEVEL SYMPOSIUM ON CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENT AND NATIONAL ECONOMY STATEMENT OF THE MINISTER OF STATE, UNION AFFAIRS AND ENVIRONMENT On 5th of June 2018, Tanzania will join other countries in the world to mark the World Environment Day (WED). This day was officiated in the first United Nations meeting on environment in Sweden in 1972, where a resolution was passed to mark it as World Environment Day to be globally celebrated each year. This year, the celebrations are being observed at the international level in New Delhi, India guided by the global theme “Beat Plastic Pollution”. The theme aims at promoting initiatives to discourage environmental degradation and pollution caused by plastic waste and plastic by-products. At the National Level, we mark WED in Dar es Salaam where city residents and all Tanzanian will have the opportunity to be informed and sensitized on how to combat the environmental challenges that impact Dar es Salaam and the country in general resulting into catastrophes particularly floods; pollution; coastline erosion along the Indian ocean coast and destruction of marine environment; and forest degradation due to the ever increasing consumption of charcoal particularly by residents in urban centres.
    [Show full text]
  • Majadiliano Ya Bunge ______
    Hii ni Nakala ya Mtandao (Online Document) BUNGE LA TANZANIA ____________ MAJADILIANO YA BUNGE _________________ MKUTANO WA KUMI NA NANE Kikao cha Kumi na Tatu – Tarehe 10 Februari, 2010 (Kikao Kilianza Saa Tatu Asubuhi) D U A Spika (Mhe. Samuel J. Sitta) Alisoma Dua HATI ZILIZOWASILISHWA MEZANI Hati zifuatazo ziliwasilishwa Mezani na:- NAIBU WAZIRI WA FEDHA NA UCHUMI (MHE. OMAR YUSSUF MZEE): Taarifa ya Mwaka na Hesabu za Benki ya Posta Tanzania, kwa Mwaka 2008 [The Annual Report and Accounts of The Tanzania Postal Bank for the Year 2008]. The Mid-Term Review of the Monetary Policy Statement of The Bank of Tanzania for the Year 2009/2010. MWENYEKITI WA KAMATI YA NISHATI NA MADINI: Taarifa ya Kamati ya Nishati na Madini juu ya Taarifa ya Serikali Kuhusu Ubinafsishwaji wa Mgodi wa Kiwira. Taarifa ya Kamati ya Nishati na Madini Kuhusu Taarifa ya Serikali ya Utekelezaji wa Azimio la Bunge Kuhusu Mchakato wa Zabuni ya Kuzalisha Umeme wa Dharura Ulioipa Ushindi Kampuni ya Richmond Development Company LLC. Houston Texas - Marekani Mwaka 2006. MWENYEKITI WA KAMATI YA MIUNDOMBINU: Taarifa ya Kamati ya Miundombinu Kuhusu Taarifa ya Serikali ya Utekelzaji wa Azimio la Bunge Kuhusu Uendeshaji Usioridhisha wa Shirika la Reli Tanzania uliofanywa na Kampuni ya RITES ya India. 1 Taarifa ya Kamati ya Miundombinu Kuhusu Taarifa ya Serikali ya Utekelezaji wa Azimio la Bunge Kuhusu Utendaji wa Kazi Usioridhisha wa Kampuni ya TICTS. MASWALI NA MAJIBU Na. 145 Usimamizi wa Ukaguzi wa Fedha za Halmashauri MHE. HERBERT J. MNTANGI aliuliza:- Kwa kuwa, kiasi cha fedha kinachopelekwa katika Halmashauri za Wilaya, Manispaa na Jiji ni kikubwa na kinahitaji usimamizi wa ziada:- Kwa kuwa kitengo cha ukaguzi wa ndani kipo chini ya Mkurugenzi Mtendaji.
    [Show full text]
  • TANZANIA GOVERNANCE REVIEW 2012: Transparency with Impunity?
    TANZANIA GOVERNANCE REVIEW 2012: Transparency with Impunity? TANZANIA GOVERNANCE REVIEW 2012: Transparency with Impunity? With Partial Support from a TANZANIA GOVERNANCE REVIEW 2012: Transparency with Impunity? ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This review was compiled and edited by Tanzania Development Research Group (TADREG) under the supervision of the Steering Group of Policy Forum members, and has been financially supported in part by Water Aid in Tanzania and Policy Forum core funders. The cartoons were drawn by Adam Lutta Published 2013 For more information and to order copies of the review please contact: Policy Forum P.O Box 38486 Dar es Salaam Tel: +255 22 2780200 Website: www.policyforum.or.tz Email: [email protected] ISBN: 978-9987 -708-09-3 © Policy Forum The conclusions drawn and views expressed on the basis of the data and analysis presented in this review do not necessarily reflect those of Policy Forum. Every effort has been made to verify the accuracy of the information contained in this review, including allegations. Nevertheless, Policy Forum cannot guarantee the accuracy and completeness of the contents. Whereas any part of this review may be reproduced providing it is properly sourced, Policy Forum cannot accept responsibility for the consequences of its use for other purposes or in other contexts. Designed by: Jamana Printers b TANZANIA GOVERNANCE REVIEW 2012: Transparency with Impunity? TABLE OF CONTENTS POLICY FORUM’s OBJECTIVES .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Forty Days and Nights of Peacemaking in Kenya
    Page numbering! JOURNAL OF AFRICAN ELECTIONS FORTY DAYS AND NIGHTS OF PEACEMAKING IN KENYA Gilbert M Khadiagala Gilbert Khadiagala is Jan Smuts Professor of International Relations, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg e-mail: [email protected] We are ready to go the extra mile to achieve peace. Today, we take the first step. My party and I are ready for this long journey to restore peace in our land …We urge our people to be patient as parties work day and night to ensure that negotiations do not last a day longer than necessary. Raila Odinga, leader of the Orange Democratic Movement (East African Standard 25 January) Kenya is a vital country in this region and the international com- munity is not ready to watch it slump into anarchy. Norwegian Ambassador Hellen Jacobsen (East African Standard 5 February) I will stay as long as it takes to get the issue of a political settlement to an irreversible point. I will not be frustrated or provoked to leave. It is in the interest of the men and women of Kenya, the region, Africa and the international community to have a new government. Former UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan (Daily Nation 6 February) ABSTRACT Recent studies on resolving civil conflicts have focused on the role of external actors in husbanding durable agreements. The contribution of authoritative parties is vital to the mediation of conflicts where parties are frequently In the interests of avoiding repetition citations will carry the date and month only unless the year is anything other than 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • The Illusion of Choice: Parallels Between the Home Cinema Industry of the 1980S and Modern Streaming Services
    International Journal of Media, Journalism and Mass Communications (IJMJMC) Volume 5, Issue 4, 2019, PP 01-08 ISSN 2454-9479 http://dx.doi.org/10.20431/2454-9479.0504001 www.arcjournals.org The Illusion of Choice: Parallels between the Home Cinema Industry of the 1980s and Modern Streaming Services Adam L. Miller* Aichi Shukutoku University, Aichi Pref, Sakuragaoka Ward 23, Nagoya City, Japan *Corresponding Author: Adam L. Miller, Aichi Shukutoku University, Aichi Pref, Sakuragaoka Ward 23, Nagoya City, Japan Abstract: This research article hopes to look at the prolific rise of VHS and home cinema in the 1980s; how it altered the viewing experiences of film-lovers, how the industry adapted to accommodate to this new market and how these viewing habits that started decades ago, still resonate today. The article will be drawing parallels between the VHS based home cinema of the 1980s to the subscription based streaming applications which are prolific today, using Netflix Inc. as the main point of focus. Keywords: “Film Studies;” “VHS;” “Home Cinema;” “Streaming” “Netflix;” 1. INTRODUCTION The article will go on to explore how the sudden emergence of home cinema in the 1980s allowed viewers to explore films, genres, filmmakers and content that is often referred to as „world cinema‟ that they may have otherwise been unaware of. It will be argued that streaming services have the same potential to expose viewers to a wide variety of content, but this potential may not be being fulfilled, as it is not in the best interests of streaming services to have viewers searching through unfamiliar territory.
    [Show full text]
  • Tanzania Human Rights Report 2008
    Legal and Human Rights Centre Tanzania Human Rights Report 2008: Progress through Human Rights Funded By; Embassy of Finland Embassy of Norway Embassy of Sweden Ford Foundation Oxfam-Novib Trocaire Foundation for Civil Society i Tanzania Human Rights Report 2008 Editorial Board Francis Kiwanga (Adv.) Helen Kijo-Bisimba Prof. Chris Maina Peter Richard Shilamba Harold Sungusia Rodrick Maro Felista Mauya Researchers Godfrey Mpandikizi Stephen Axwesso Laetitia Petro Writers Clarence Kipobota Sarah Louw Publisher Legal and Human Rights Centre LHRC, April 2009 ISBN: 978-9987-432-74-5 ii Acknowledgements We would like to recognize the immense contribution of several individuals, institutions, governmental departments, and non-governmental organisations. The information they provided to us was invaluable to the preparation of this report. We are also grateful for the great work done by LHRC employees Laetitia Petro, Richard Shilamba, Godfrey Mpandikizi, Stephen Axwesso, Mashauri Jeremiah, Ally Mwashongo, Abuu Adballah and Charles Luther who facilitated the distribution, collection and analysis of information gathered from different areas of Tanzania. Our 131 field human rights monitors and paralegals also played an important role in preparing this report by providing us with current information about the human rights’ situation at the grass roots’ level. We greatly appreciate the assistance we received from the members of the editorial board, who are: Helen Kijo-Bisimba, Francis Kiwanga, Rodrick Maro, Felista Mauya, Professor Chris Maina Peter, and Harold Sungusia for their invaluable input on the content and form of this report. Their contributions helped us to create a better report. We would like to recognize the financial support we received from various partners to prepare and publish this report.
    [Show full text]