Parquet Theory in Nuclear Structure Calculations

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Parquet Theory in Nuclear Structure Calculations View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives Parquet theory in nuclear structure calculations Elise Bergli Thesis submitted to the degree of Philosophiae Doctor Department of Physics University of Oslo February 2010 © Elise Bergli, 2010 Series of dissertations submitted to the Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo No. 926 ISSN 1501-7710 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without permission. Cover: Inger Sandved Anfinsen. Printed in Norway: AiT e-dit AS. Produced in co-operation with Unipub. The thesis is produced by Unipub merely in connection with the thesis defence. Kindly direct all inquiries regarding the thesis to the copyright holder or the unit which grants the doctorate. Acknowledgements This thesis is primarily, of course, my own work. It has taken quite some time, not all of it pleasant, and I look forward to finally be doing something else. However, looking back, there are several people whom I would like to thank. Without them, I would not have been able to finish. First of all, I thank my adviser Morten Hjorth-Jensen. You have pro- vided more advise and encouragement than most advisers, being accessible and ready to answer questions at almost all times, regardless of time or place. I have really learned a lot from you these years. And I would also like to thank my co-adviser Eivind Osnes for pleasant discussions and having such an immense amount of literature available. I would like to thank all my different office mates during these years: Victoria, Simen, Mateuz, Jon, Konrad, Maxim, Gustav and Øyvind. You have provided lots of interesting discussions and diversions on almost any subject imaginable. Sometimes we have even discussed physics... Most of you have also been able to provide insights and help me with numerous technical problems. Thanks also to Joakim, for all our lunch discussions and the last- minute proof-reading and comments. And then there is as always my family, my most constant source of hap- piness. Thank you for simply being, my life would feel empty without you. Contents Contents i 1 Introduction 1 2 Ab initio methods for nuclear structure calculations 7 2.1Many-bodyformalismandquasiparticles............ 8 2.2Thebarenucleon-nucleon(NN)interaction........... 11 2.3Effectiveinteractionsinfinitemodelspaces........... 13 2.4 Ab Initio approachesforlightandmedium-massnuclei..... 17 2.5Effectiveinteractionsintheshellmodel............. 20 2.6Nucleardensityfunctionaltheory................. 21 3 Many-Body theory and Green’s functions 23 3.1 The one-particle propagator . ........... 23 3.2Thefour-pointGreen’sfunction.................. 26 3.3Selfenergy............................. 30 3.4Theeigenvalueequationmethod................. 34 4 Parquet summation of diagrams 37 4.1 Channels: Equivalent ways of building the interaction operator 38 4.2 Two-time propagators . ..................... 44 4.3Self-consistentParquetequations................. 48 4.4ApproximatesolutiontotheDysonequation.......... 56 4.5Summaryofthedifferentapproximations............ 58 5 A simple model 63 5.1Descriptionofthemodel...................... 63 5.2Resultsforthepairing-onlymodel................ 65 5.3Pair-breakinginteraction...................... 81 5.4 Selected combinations of g and f .................106 i ii CONTENTS 5.5Summary..............................108 6Resultsfor4He 111 6.1 Results for unperturbed propagator structure (UPS) approxi- mation................................112 6.2 Results for fixed-energy Dyson equation (FED) approximation 138 6.3 Summary of the 4Heresults....................154 7 Conclusions and future work 157 Bibliography 163 1 Introduction Most real systems consist of several interacting bodies, and so many-body physics is an essential ingredient in any realistic description of the physical world. Quantum many-body theory concerns the fundamental properties of systems where the quantum nature of the constituents plays an important role. These include both small systems like nucleons, nuclei, atoms and small molecules, and large-scale systems as electrons in matter and nuclear matter in neutron stars. The problems encountered are notoriously complex and hard to solve, and many strategies exists to cope with different systems. The fundamental challenge common to all such problems is that describing the motion of all particles involved amounts to keeping track of far too much information for any straight-forward course of attack. Methods developed to handle this complex situation and transform it into something tractable are therefore mostly quite general and can be applied to a number of different systems, each providing different testing grounds for the general methods. The physical systems chosen as subject for study in this thesis are low- energy nuclear systems, that is, nuclei and nuclear matter on an energy scale where the appropriate building blocks are the nucleons, the protons and neu- trons. The range of possible combinations of nucleons spans from the single proton in a hydrogen nucleus to the couple of hundreds found in the the heav- iest nuclei, and then on to the (essentially) infinite number of particles in a neutron star. Nuclear systems are very challenging quantum many-body problems due both to the complexity of the strong force and to the number of particles involved, most nuclei being in the difficult mesoscopic range of too many particles to handle each separately and too few for statistical treatments. The aim of ab initio methods in nuclear structure calculations is to de- scribe the nucleus and nuclear matter from first principles only, with as little use of phenomenological determination as possible, ultimately building a co- herent framework enabling calculations of low-energy nuclear structure and reaction ratios starting from the field theories of sub-nuclear particle physics and the standard model of Quantum Chromo Dynamic (QCD). If successful, 1 2 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION not only will we gain the satisfaction of being able to study nuclei and nuclear reactions from fundamental principles, but also the possibility of predicting key properties of short-lived nuclei present in stellar interiors and generated during supernova explosions, furthering our understanding of the ratios of dif- ferent nuclei found in our part of the universe. On a more practical level, numerical computations across the range of exotic nuclei opens up for far eas- ier determination of isotopes with specific characteristics that can be used in medicinal diagnostic and therapeutic treatments. Accurate computations could also be an ingredient in fine-tuning nuclear reactor designs to increase safety and efficiency. The complexity of the computations increases very rapidly with increasing particle number. A layered approach is necessary, where only the relevant degrees of freedom for a given system are taken into account. Starting from QCD, the first step is to generate a theory where only nucleons exist, and all effects of the underlying strong force is taken into account by the effective force between the nucleons. This effective force acts between two nucleons in vacuum, and is called the bare interaction. Then we can start to put the nucleons together to form nuclei. Nuclei are quantum systems, and as such, there exists several general approaches which can be applied to these systems. One of the major obstacles is that the interaction between pairs of nucleons changes dramatically in the presence of other nucleons. The complexity of the computations increases and makes approaches to nuclear structure calcu- lations based on the bare two-body interaction directly very impractical for heavier nuclei. A popular simplification is to generate a new effective interac- tion which takes the presence of the surrounding nucleons into account. This thesis concerns one possible framework, the summation of Parquet diagrams within Green’s function theory, to obtain an effective interaction and use it to calculate properties of interest for finite nuclei. The Green’s functions (propagator) method is one of the standard the- oretical descriptions of quantum mechanics, underlying the huge family of Feynman diagram methods employed in most high-energy physics. In the many-body context, two features of many-body systems provides the basis for applying propagator techniques. Firstly, almost all quantum systems of strongly interacting particles (where two particles exchange large amounts of energy each time they interact) can be described as a weakly interacting system of quasi particles (where the quasi particles exchange much smaller amounts of energy when they interact), given the right choice of definition of the quasi particles. Secondly, to find most of the important physical proper- ties of a system, it is not necessary to know the behaviour of each particle exactly, rather it is enough to know the average behaviour of one or two typ- 3 ical particles. The quantities describing this average behaviour are the one- and two-body propagators. Once these are known, most physical properties of the system can be derived. The mathematical transparency, the generality and the close connection between the fundamental definitions and the physical observables makes Green’s function based theories ideal for studies of general properties of many-body theories and the relations between different methods. Within the field of nuclear structure calculations, this framework has
Recommended publications
  • Advances in Nuclear Physics
    ADVANCES IN NUCLEAR PHYSICS VOLUME 27 CONTRIBUTORS TO THIS VOLUME Stefan Scherer Igal Talmi Institut für Kernphysik The Weizmann Institute of Science Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz Rehovot, Israel Mainz, Germany A Continuation Order Plan is available for this series. A continuation order will bring delivery of each new volume immediately upon publication. Volumes are billed only upon actual shipment. For further information please contact the publisher. ADVANCES IN NUCLEAR PHYSICS Edited by J. W. Negele Center for Theoretical Physics Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, Massachusetts E. W. Vogt Department of Physics University of British Columbia Vancouver, B.C., Canada VOLUME 27 KLUWER ACADEMIC PUBLISHERS NEW YORK, BOSTON, DORDRECHT, LONDON, MOSCOW eBook ISBN: 0-306-47916-8 Print ISBN: 0-306-47708-4 ©2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers New York, Boston, Dordrecht, London, Moscow Print ©2003 Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers New York All rights reserved No part of this eBook may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, recording, or otherwise, without written consent from the Publisher Created in the United States of America Visit Kluwer Online at: http://kluweronline.com and Kluwer's eBookstore at: http://ebooks.kluweronline.com ARTICLES PUBLISHED IN EARLIER VOLUMES Volume 1 The Reorientation Effect • J. de Boer and J. Eicher The Nuclear Model • M. Harvey The Hartree-Fock Theory of Deformed Light Nuclei • G. Ripka The Statistical Theory of Nuclear Reactions • E. Vogt Three-Particle Scattering—A Review of Recent Work on the Nonrelativistic Theory • I. Duck Volume 2 The Giant Dipole Resonance • B. M. Spicer Polarization Phenomena in Nuclear Reactions • C.
    [Show full text]
  • The INT @ 20 the Future of Nuclear Physics and Its Intersections July 1 – 2, 2010
    The INT @ 20 The Future of Nuclear Physics and its Intersections July 1 – 2, 2010 Program Thursday, July 1: 8:00 – 8:45: Registration (Kane Hall, Rom 210) 8:45 – 9:00: Opening remarks Mary Lidstrom, Vice Provost for Research, University of Washington David Kaplan, INT Director Session chair: David Kaplan 9:00 – 9:45: Science & Society 9:00 – 9:45 Steven Koonin, Undersecretary for Science, DOE The future of DOE and its intersections 9:45 – 10:30: Strong Interactions and Fundamental Symmetries 9:45 – 10:30 Howard Georgi, Harvard University QCD – From flavor SU(3) to effective field theory 10:30 – 11:00: Coffee Break Session chair: Martin Savage 11:00 – 11:30 Silas Beane, University of New Hampsire Lattice QCD for nuclear physics 11:30 – 12:00 Paulo Bedaque, University of Maryland Effective field theories in nuclear physics 12:00 – 12:30 Michael Ramsey-Musolf, University of Wisconsin Fundamental symmetries of nuclear physics: A window on the early Universe 12:30 – 2:00: Lunch (Mary Gates Hall) 1 Thursday, July 1 2:00 – 5:00: From Partons to Extreme Matter Session chair: Gerald Miller 2:00 – 2:30 Matthias Burkardt, New Mexico State University Transverse (spin) structure of hadrons 2:30 – 3:00 Barbara Jacak, SUNY Stony Brook Quark-gluon plasma: from particles to fields? 3:00 – 3:45 Raju Venugopalan, Brookhaven National Lab Wee gluons and their role in creating the hottest matter on Earth 3:45 – 4:15: Coffee Break Session chair: Krishna Rajagopal 4:15 – 4:45 Jean-Paul Blaizot, Saclay Is the quark-gluon plasma strongly or weakly coupled? 4:45
    [Show full text]
  • APS Announces Spring 2000 Prize and Award Recipients
    Spring 2000 APS AnnouncesPrizes Spring 2000and Prize andAwards Award Recipients wenty-nine APS prizes and awards collaborates with many biologists, espe- was a postdoctoral fel- 2000 DAVISSON-GERMER PRIZE will be presented during special cially his wife of 30 years, Helen, a low at Cambridge T IN ATOMIC OR SURFACE biochemist. His group now has prototypes University (England) sessions at three spring meetings of the PHYSICS Society: the 2000 March Meeting, for a new generation of AFMs that can use in 1959-60, joined the cantilevers on order of magnitude smaller technical staff of the March 20-24, in Minneapolis, MN; the William Happer than used in current commercial AFMs. Bell Telephone Labora- 2000 April Meeting, April 29 - May 2, Princeton University tories in 1960, and the in Long Beach, CA; and the spring Citation: “For his research leading to fun- physics faculty at Ber- meeting of the APS Division of 2000 OLIVER E. BUCKLEY PRIZE keley in 1966. He has been a visiting Atomic, Molecular and Optical Phys- damental understanding and applications of atomic processes on spin or excitation scientist at Cambridge University, the Max ics, June 14 - 17, in Storrs, CT. Citations Gerald J. Dolan transfer through atomic collisions.” Planck Institutes for Solid State Physics at and biographical information for each Private Consultant Stuttgart and Radio Astronomy at Bonn, recipient follow. Additional biographi- Happer received his the Ecole Normale Superieure in Paris, the cal information and appropriate Web Theodore A. Fulton PhD degree in physics Paris Observatory, and the University of links can be found at the APS Web site Lucent Technologies from Princeton Uni- Rome.
    [Show full text]
  • January 2021 Newsletter
    APS Division of In this issue Astrophysics • April Meeting Online • Upcoming DAP election alert Electronic Newsletter January 2021 • APS Fellows • Bethe Prize Winner • Student/Postdoc Travel Grants • April Meeting: DAP and Plenary Programs & Abstract Categories • Snowmass Update APS DAP Officers 2020–2021: Finalize your plans now to attend the April 2021 meeting held virtually this year. A • Chair: Glennys Farrar number of plenary and invited sessions will • Past Chair: Joshua Frieman feature presentations by DAP members. Here are the key details: • Chair Elect: Chris Fryer • Vice Chair: Daniel Holz What: April 2021 APS Meeting ​ ​ ​ • Secretary/Treasurer: Judith Racusin When: April 17 - 20, 2021 ​ • Deputy Sec./Treasurer: Amy Furniss Where: Online ​ Abstract Deadline: Jan 8, 2021, 5 pm EST • Division Councilor: Cole Miller ​ Travel Grant Deadline: Jan 31, 2021 • Member-at-Large: Stefano Profumo ​ Early Registration Deadline: Feb 26, 2021 • Member-at-Large: Ignacio Taboada ​ Late Registration Deadline: Mar 26, 2021 ​ • Member-at-Large: Erin Kara • Member-at-Large: Laura Blecha The 2021 April Meeting will be virtual. ​ Questions? Comments? Detailed information for the meeting, including details on registration and the scientific Newsletter editors: program can be found online at https://april.aps.org/ Amy Furniss [email protected] HEADS-UP: The ELECTION for next year’s ​ ​ DAP Executive Committee and chairline will Judith Racusin be held soon. Be on the lookout for the [email protected] announcement from APS, and please vote! ​ 1 Dear DAP, Please see the January 2021 DAP newsletter below. It will be archived on the DAP website (https://www.aps.org/units/dap/newsletters/index.cfm).
    [Show full text]
  • B1487(01)Quarks FM.I-Xvi
    Connecting Quarks with the Cosmos Eleven Science Questions for the New Century Committee on the Physics of the Universe Board on Physics and Astronomy Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS Washington, D.C. www.nap.edu THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20001 NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Govern- ing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineer- ing, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance. This project was supported by Grant No. DE-FG02-00ER41141 between the Na- tional Academy of Sciences and the Department of Energy, Grant No. NAG5-9268 between the National Academy of Sciences and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and Grant No. PHY-0079915 between the National Academy of Sciences and the National Science Foundation. Any opinions, findings, and conclu- sions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the organizations or agencies that pro- vided support for the project. International Standard Book Number 0-309-07406-1 Library of Congress Control Number 2003100888 Additional copies of this report are available from the National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, N.W., Lockbox 285, Washington, DC 20055; (800) 624-6242 or (202) 334-3313 (in the Washington metropolitan area); Internet, http://www.nap.edu and Board on Physics and Astronomy, National Research Council, NA 922, 500 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20001; Internet, http://www.national-academies.org/bpa.
    [Show full text]
  • Renormalization Group for One Dimensional Ising Model Masatsugu Sei Suzuki, Department of Physics, SUNY at Binghamton (Date: December 04, 2016)
    Renormalization group for one dimensional Ising model Masatsugu Sei Suzuki, Department of Physics, SUNY at Binghamton (Date: December 04, 2016) Kenneth Geddes Wilson (June 8, 1936 – June 15, 2013) was an American theoretical physicist and a pioneer in leveraging computers for studying particle physics. He was awarded the 1982 Nobel Prize in Physics for his work on phase transitions—illuminating the subtle essence of phenomena like melting ice and emerging magnetism. It was embodied in his fundamental work on the renormalization group. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_G._Wilson Here we discuss the renormalization group (RG) for the simplest possible example- the one- dimensional Ising model. The results of the RG calculations are compared with the exact calculations of the correlation functions and the free energy of the one-dimensional Ising model; the temperature T = 0 can be treated as a second-order critical point. ______________________________________________________________________________ Leo Philip Kadanoff: Kadanoff was born in 1937 and spent his early life in New York City. He received his PhD from Harvard in 1960 and was a postdoctoral researcher at the Niels Bohr Institute in Copenhagen until he moved to the University of Illinois in 1962. His work there concerned the development of many-body theory techniques, culminating in a short but highly influential monograph with Gordon Baym, which is still widely used today. Kadanoff found himself, in the mid- 1960s, working on the problem of phase transitions. It had been known since the work of Lev Landau in 1937 that second-order phase transitions would exhibit power-law singularities or divergences as the temperature approached the critical point.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter No. 130 February 2002
    Division of Nuclear Physics Newsletter No. 130 The American Physical Society February 2002 TO: Members of the Division of Nuclear Physics, APS FROM: Benjamin F. Gibson, LANL – Secretary-Treasurer, DNP ACCOMPANYING THIS NEWSLETTER: Divisional Councilor (December 2005) • Poster for DNP 2002 Alejandro Garcia, Notre Dame (2003) • DNP02 Speaker Nomination form Charlotte Elster, Ohio Univ. (2002) John C. Hardy, Texas A&M (2003) T. S. Harry Lee, ANL (2002) Bradley M. Sherrill, MSU (2002) 2002 Willem T. H. van Oers, Manitoba (2003) DNP 2. CALL FOR DNP COMMITTEE SUGGESTIONS Future Deadlines The terms of some of the members of the following DNP committees expire in April 2002: Bethe, Bonner, Fellowship, Nominating, • 29 March 2002 — Speaker Nominations for Fall Meeting Home Page, and Education. Suggestions from the DNP membership • 1 April 2002 — APS Fellowship Nominations for new members of these committees are welcome and should be sent • 1 July 2002 — Nominations for Bonner Prize to Charles Glashausser. A list of committee members for 2002/03 • 1 July 2002 — Nominations for Bethe Prize will be published in the August newsletter. • 1 July 2002 — Nominations for Dissertation Award 3. 2002 BONNER PRIZE WINNER J. David Bowman of the Los Alamos National Laboratory has been A WWW home page for the Division of Nuclear Physics is named the winner of the 2002 Tom W. Bonner Prize in nuclear available at “http://nucth.physics.wisc.edu/dnp.” Information of physics. The citation reads: interest to DNP members -- current research topics, deadlines for meetings, prize nominations, forms, and useful links are In recognition of his leadership in performing precision provided.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear and Nuclear Excitation Energies
    ANTIBES (France ) 20 - 25 JUNE, 1994 NUCLEAR AND NUCLEAR EXCITATION ENERGIES ' ~ 9£»г* Sponsored by : CNRS/IN2P3 cl Laboratoires CEA/DAM - CEA/DSM IUR1SYS MESURES Résumés des contributions Abstracts of contributed papers ;.%•• I tpîi^ I •3' ï^^rrfV-- ^^?sji;>4.ô <,!!•*• ANTIBES, France June 20-25,1994 NUCLEAR SHAPES AND NUCLEAR STRUCTURE AT LOW EXCITATION ENERGIES Abstracts of contributed papers Résumés des contributions Edited by F. DYKSTRA, D. GOUTTE, J. SAUVAGE and M. VERGNES Institut de Physique Nucléaire F-91406 ORSAY Cedex France This volume has been prepared by Miss C. Vogelaer Ce fascicule a été préparé par Mette C. Vogelaer International Committee Comité International M. ARNOULD (Bruxelles) J. AYSTO (Jyvâskylà) J. BAUCHE (Orsay) D. BES (Buenos Aires) P. BONCHE (Saclay) H. BORNER (Grenoble) R.F. CASTEN (Brookhaven) H. DOUBRE (Orsay) D. HABS (Heidelberg) I. HAMAMOTO (Lwid; K. HEYDE (Gent) R.V.F. JANSSENS (Argonne) B. JONSON (Gôteborg) W. NAZAREWICZ (ORNL/Warsaw) E.W. OTTEN (Mamzj P. RING (Garching) H. SERGOLLE (Огаг^ P. Von BRENTANO (Ко/и) M. WEISS (Livermore) Organizing Committee Comité d'Organisation G. BARREAU (Bordeaux) J.-F. BERGER (Bruyères-le-Châtel) A. GIZON (Grenoble) D. GOUTTE (Saclay) P.H. HEENEN (Bruxelles) J. LIBERT (Orsay) M. MEYER 6Ly0rt) J. PINARD (Orsay) P. QUENTIN (Bordeaux) B. ROUSSIERE (Orjoy) J. SAUVAGE (Orsay) N. SCHULZ (Strasbourg) M. VERGNES Conférence Secrétariat Secrétariat de la Conférence F. DYKSTRA (Orsay) 232 CONTENTS - On the existence of intrinsic reflection asymmetry in Z~62, N~90 region 1 A.V. Afanasjev. S. Mizutori, I. Ragnarsson - Symmetry breaking in simple one and two level models 2 P.
    [Show full text]
  • Utilisation D'une Interaction Nucléon-Nucléon De Portée Finie
    Utilisation d’une interaction nucléon-nucléon de portée finie dans le formalisme du modèle en couches avec couplage aux états du continuum. Jean Baptiste Faes To cite this version: Jean Baptiste Faes. Utilisation d’une interaction nucléon-nucléon de portée finie dans le formalisme du modèle en couches avec couplage aux états du continuum.. Physique Nucléaire Théorique [nucl-th]. Université de Caen, 2007. Français. tel-00371317 HAL Id: tel-00371317 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00371317 Submitted on 27 Mar 2009 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. GANIL T 07 01 UNIVERSITE de CAEN/ BASSE NORMANDIE U.F.R. de Sciences ECOLE DOCTORALE SIMEM THESE Présentée par Mr Jean-Baptiste FAES et soutenue le 13 avril 2007 en vue de l’obtention du DOCTORAT de l’UNIVERSITÉ de CAEN Spécialité : Constituants élémentaires (Arrêté du 07 Août 2006) Titre : Utilisation d’une interaction nucléon-nucléon de portée finie dans le formalisme du modèle en couches avec couplage aux états du continuum. MEMBRES du JURY : Mr Morten HJORTH-JENSEN, Professeur, Université de Oslo (rapporteur) Mr Van Giai NGUYEN, Directeur de recherche CNRS, IPN Orsay (rapporteur) Mr Chris HEYDE, Professeur, Université de Gent Mr Oscar NAVILIAT-CUNCIC, Professeur, Université de Caen Mme Ingrid ROTTER, Professeur, Institut für Komplexe Systeme, Dresden Mr Jan VAAGEN, Profeseur, Université de Bergen Mr Marek PLOSZAJCZAK, Directeur de recherche, GANIL Caen (Directeur de thèse) UNIVERSITE´ de CAEN/BASSE-NORMANDIE U.F.R Sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • NEWSLETTER NO. 81 February 1990
    DNPDNP NEWSLETTER NO. 81 February 1990 TO: MEMBERS OF THE DIVISION OF NUCLEAR PHYSICS, APS FROM: VIRGINIA R. BROWN, LLNL, SECRETARY-TREASURER, DNP Komoto, Robert Lanier, Mohammed G. Mustafa, and Betty ACCOMPANYING THIS NEWSLETTER : Voelker, all of LLNL. The members of the 1990 Executive Committee (except for the Division Councillor, terms end 16-19 April APS meeting, Washington DC: at the Spring APS meeting following the year indicated) are as follows: • A listing of the Symposia of the DNP, the invited speakers, and titles of their talks. James B. Ball, ORNL, Chairman (1991) Gerard M. Crawley, Michigan State University, Vice- 24-27 October DNP Meeting, Urbana-Champaign: Chairman (1991) Virginia R. Brown, LLNL, Secretary-Treasurer (1991) • A nomination form for invited speakers. Gerald T. Garvey, LANL, Division Councillor, (1993) • A pre-registration form which includes workshops John Cameron, IUCF (1992) and banquet. Bunny C. Clark, Ohio State University (1991) • A housing form. Robert A. Eisenstein, University of Illinois, Past • United Airlines discount information. Chairman (1991) • A Poster. Wick C. Haxton, University of Washington (1991) Noemie Benczer-Koller, Rutgers University (1992) Jerry A. Nolen, Jr., Michigan State University (1991) Peter D. Parker, Yale University (1992) UTURE EADLINES F D 2. COMMITTEES OF THE DNP • 1 April 1990 - APS Fellowship Nominations (see item 9). The terms of some of the members of the following • 11 May 1990 -Nomination forms for invited speakers DNP committees expire in April 1990: Program, for the Urbana-Champaign meeting. Fellowship, Nominating, Nuclear Science Resources, and • 20 June 1990 - Abstracts for Urbana-Champaign "Physics News". Suggestions from the DNP membership meeting (See item 7).
    [Show full text]
  • List of EXON-2004 Participants Registered by 11 June Name
    List of EXON-2004 Participants registered by 11 June Name Title of talk Country 1. Farid Abdullin New Data on Average Charge Values of Heavy Nuclei JINR 2. Yasuhisa Abe Theoretical predictions of excitation functions for Japan synthesis of the superheavy elements 3. Nicolas Alamanos Sub Barrier Fusion with Weakly Bound Nuclei France 4. Remy Anne Technical status of SPIRAL 2 France 5. Yoshihiro Aritomo Fusion-fission dynamics for synthesis of super heavy JINR elements 6. Nasima Allial Proton-neutron pairing Algeria 7. Anatoly Artukh On the Formation Mechanism of Forward-Angle JINR Products In The Reactions 18O(35 Mev/U) + 181Ta (9Be) 8. Marcos Alvarez A global optical potential to study exotic and weakly France bound nuclei interactions. 9. Alberto Andrighetto Isotopes production from UCx target with proton Beam Italy 10. Georges Audi The 2003 Nubase Evaluation and the 2003 Atomic Mass France Evaluation 11. Olivier Bajeat Optimization of ISOL UCx targets for fission induced by France fast neutrons or electrons. Application for the Spiral 2 project and for the Alto project 12. Anatoly Barzakh Changes in the mean square charge radii of neutron Russia deficient europium isotopes measured by the laser ion source resonance ionization spectroscopy 13. Jon Batchelder Fine Structure Studies of Proton Emitters at HRIBF USA 14. Bertram Blank 2p Radioactivity France 15. Zdzislaw Blaszczak Prospects of laser spectroscopy in the study of nuclear Poland matter 16. Alexey Bogachev Yields of correlated fragment pairs in the reaction JINR 208Pb(18O,f), obtained in gamma-gamma coincidence method. 17. Virginie Bouchat Search for tetraneutrons in the breakup of 8He Belgium 18.
    [Show full text]
  • Electron-Ion Collider Science
    BOARD ON PHYSICS AND ASTRONOMY (BPA) An Assessment of U.S.-Based Electron-Ion Collider Science A study under the auspices of the U.S. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine Gordon Baym and Ani Aprahamian, Co-Chairs The study is supported by funding from the DOE Office of Science. (Further information can be found at: https://www.nap.edu/25171) The National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine The National Academies produce reports that shape policies, inform public opinion, and advance the pursuit of science, engineering, and medicine. The present report is carried out under the leadership of the Board on Physics and Astronomy (James Lancaster, Director). The BPA seeks to inform the government and the public about what is needed to continue the advancement of physics and astronomy and why doing so is important. Committee on Assessment of U.S.-Based Electron-Ion Collider Science The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine was asked by the U.S. Department of Energy to assess the scientific justification for building an Electron-Ion Collider (EIC) facility. The unanimous conclusion of the Committee is that an EIC, as envisioned in this report, would be… … a unique facility in the world that would answer science questions that are compelling, fundamental, and timely, and help maintain U.S. scientific leadership in nuclear physics. What is an Electron-Ion Collider? An advanced accelerator that collides beams of electrons with beams of protons or heavier ions (atomic nuclei). Electron-ion center of mass energy ~20-100 GeV, upgradable to ~140 GeV. High luminosity and polarization! 1) highly polarized electrons, E ~ 4 GeV to possibly 20 GeV 2) highly polarized protons, E ~ 30 GeV to some 300 GeV, and heavier ions Brookhaven Jefferson Lab Two possible configurations: Brookhaven Nat’l Lab and Jefferson Lab Committee Statement of Task -- from DOE to the BPA The committee will assess the scientific justification for a U.S.
    [Show full text]