January 2021 Newsletter
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The INT @ 20 the Future of Nuclear Physics and Its Intersections July 1 – 2, 2010
The INT @ 20 The Future of Nuclear Physics and its Intersections July 1 – 2, 2010 Program Thursday, July 1: 8:00 – 8:45: Registration (Kane Hall, Rom 210) 8:45 – 9:00: Opening remarks Mary Lidstrom, Vice Provost for Research, University of Washington David Kaplan, INT Director Session chair: David Kaplan 9:00 – 9:45: Science & Society 9:00 – 9:45 Steven Koonin, Undersecretary for Science, DOE The future of DOE and its intersections 9:45 – 10:30: Strong Interactions and Fundamental Symmetries 9:45 – 10:30 Howard Georgi, Harvard University QCD – From flavor SU(3) to effective field theory 10:30 – 11:00: Coffee Break Session chair: Martin Savage 11:00 – 11:30 Silas Beane, University of New Hampsire Lattice QCD for nuclear physics 11:30 – 12:00 Paulo Bedaque, University of Maryland Effective field theories in nuclear physics 12:00 – 12:30 Michael Ramsey-Musolf, University of Wisconsin Fundamental symmetries of nuclear physics: A window on the early Universe 12:30 – 2:00: Lunch (Mary Gates Hall) 1 Thursday, July 1 2:00 – 5:00: From Partons to Extreme Matter Session chair: Gerald Miller 2:00 – 2:30 Matthias Burkardt, New Mexico State University Transverse (spin) structure of hadrons 2:30 – 3:00 Barbara Jacak, SUNY Stony Brook Quark-gluon plasma: from particles to fields? 3:00 – 3:45 Raju Venugopalan, Brookhaven National Lab Wee gluons and their role in creating the hottest matter on Earth 3:45 – 4:15: Coffee Break Session chair: Krishna Rajagopal 4:15 – 4:45 Jean-Paul Blaizot, Saclay Is the quark-gluon plasma strongly or weakly coupled? 4:45 -
LIGO SCIENTIFIC COLLABORATION VIRGO COLLABORATION the LSC
LIGO SCIENTIFIC COLLABORATION VIRGO COLLABORATION Document Type LIGO–T1100322 VIR-0353A-11 The LSC-Virgo white paper on gravitational wave data analysis Science goals, status and plans, priorities (2011–2012 edition) The LSC-Virgo Data Analysis Working Groups, the Data Analysis Software Working Group, the Detector Characterization Working Group and the Computing Committee WWW: http://www.ligo.org/ and http://www.virgo.infn.it Processed with LATEX on 2011/10/13 LSC-Virgo data analysis white paper Contents 1 Introduction 6 2 The characterization of the data 8 2.1 LSC-Virgo-wide detector characterization priorities . .8 2.2 LIGO Detector Characterization . .9 2.2.1 Introduction . .9 2.2.2 Preparing for the Advanced Detector Era . 10 2.2.3 Priorities for LIGO Detector Characterization . 11 2.2.4 Data Run Support . 11 2.2.5 Software Infrastructure . 12 2.2.6 Noise Transients . 14 2.2.7 Spectral Features . 15 2.2.8 Calibration . 16 2.2.9 Timing . 17 2.3 GEO Detector Characterization . 18 2.3.1 Introduction . 18 2.3.2 Transient Studies . 19 2.3.3 Stationary Studies . 20 2.3.4 Stability Studies . 21 2.3.5 Calibration . 21 2.3.6 Resources . 22 2.4 Virgo Detector Characterization . 22 2.4.1 Introduction . 22 2.4.2 Calibration and h-reconstruction . 23 2.4.3 Environmental noise . 24 2.4.4 Virgo Data Quality and vetoes . 26 2.4.5 Monitoring Tools . 28 2.4.6 Noise monitoring tools . 29 2.4.7 The Virgo Data Base . 31 2.4.8 Virgo detector characterization next steps . -
B1487(01)Quarks FM.I-Xvi
Connecting Quarks with the Cosmos Eleven Science Questions for the New Century Committee on the Physics of the Universe Board on Physics and Astronomy Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS Washington, D.C. www.nap.edu THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20001 NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Govern- ing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineer- ing, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance. This project was supported by Grant No. DE-FG02-00ER41141 between the Na- tional Academy of Sciences and the Department of Energy, Grant No. NAG5-9268 between the National Academy of Sciences and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and Grant No. PHY-0079915 between the National Academy of Sciences and the National Science Foundation. Any opinions, findings, and conclu- sions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the organizations or agencies that pro- vided support for the project. International Standard Book Number 0-309-07406-1 Library of Congress Control Number 2003100888 Additional copies of this report are available from the National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, N.W., Lockbox 285, Washington, DC 20055; (800) 624-6242 or (202) 334-3313 (in the Washington metropolitan area); Internet, http://www.nap.edu and Board on Physics and Astronomy, National Research Council, NA 922, 500 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20001; Internet, http://www.national-academies.org/bpa. -
Renormalization Group for One Dimensional Ising Model Masatsugu Sei Suzuki, Department of Physics, SUNY at Binghamton (Date: December 04, 2016)
Renormalization group for one dimensional Ising model Masatsugu Sei Suzuki, Department of Physics, SUNY at Binghamton (Date: December 04, 2016) Kenneth Geddes Wilson (June 8, 1936 – June 15, 2013) was an American theoretical physicist and a pioneer in leveraging computers for studying particle physics. He was awarded the 1982 Nobel Prize in Physics for his work on phase transitions—illuminating the subtle essence of phenomena like melting ice and emerging magnetism. It was embodied in his fundamental work on the renormalization group. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_G._Wilson Here we discuss the renormalization group (RG) for the simplest possible example- the one- dimensional Ising model. The results of the RG calculations are compared with the exact calculations of the correlation functions and the free energy of the one-dimensional Ising model; the temperature T = 0 can be treated as a second-order critical point. ______________________________________________________________________________ Leo Philip Kadanoff: Kadanoff was born in 1937 and spent his early life in New York City. He received his PhD from Harvard in 1960 and was a postdoctoral researcher at the Niels Bohr Institute in Copenhagen until he moved to the University of Illinois in 1962. His work there concerned the development of many-body theory techniques, culminating in a short but highly influential monograph with Gordon Baym, which is still widely used today. Kadanoff found himself, in the mid- 1960s, working on the problem of phase transitions. It had been known since the work of Lev Landau in 1937 that second-order phase transitions would exhibit power-law singularities or divergences as the temperature approached the critical point. -
Newsletter No. 130 February 2002
Division of Nuclear Physics Newsletter No. 130 The American Physical Society February 2002 TO: Members of the Division of Nuclear Physics, APS FROM: Benjamin F. Gibson, LANL – Secretary-Treasurer, DNP ACCOMPANYING THIS NEWSLETTER: Divisional Councilor (December 2005) • Poster for DNP 2002 Alejandro Garcia, Notre Dame (2003) • DNP02 Speaker Nomination form Charlotte Elster, Ohio Univ. (2002) John C. Hardy, Texas A&M (2003) T. S. Harry Lee, ANL (2002) Bradley M. Sherrill, MSU (2002) 2002 Willem T. H. van Oers, Manitoba (2003) DNP 2. CALL FOR DNP COMMITTEE SUGGESTIONS Future Deadlines The terms of some of the members of the following DNP committees expire in April 2002: Bethe, Bonner, Fellowship, Nominating, • 29 March 2002 — Speaker Nominations for Fall Meeting Home Page, and Education. Suggestions from the DNP membership • 1 April 2002 — APS Fellowship Nominations for new members of these committees are welcome and should be sent • 1 July 2002 — Nominations for Bonner Prize to Charles Glashausser. A list of committee members for 2002/03 • 1 July 2002 — Nominations for Bethe Prize will be published in the August newsletter. • 1 July 2002 — Nominations for Dissertation Award 3. 2002 BONNER PRIZE WINNER J. David Bowman of the Los Alamos National Laboratory has been A WWW home page for the Division of Nuclear Physics is named the winner of the 2002 Tom W. Bonner Prize in nuclear available at “http://nucth.physics.wisc.edu/dnp.” Information of physics. The citation reads: interest to DNP members -- current research topics, deadlines for meetings, prize nominations, forms, and useful links are In recognition of his leadership in performing precision provided. -
The University of Chicago Astronomy and Cosmology
THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO ASTRONOMY AND COSMOLOGY WITH GRAVITATIONAL WAVES A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE DIVISION OF THE PHYSICAL SCIENCES IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS BY MAYA FISHBACH CHICAGO, ILLINOIS AUGUST 2020 Copyright c 2020 by Maya Fishbach All Rights Reserved לאמא ואבא To my parents TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES . vii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . xv ABSTRACT . xvi 1 INTRODUCTION . 1 2 ARE LIGO'S BLACK HOLES MADE FROM SMALLER BLACK HOLES? . 5 2.1 Abstract . .6 2.2 Introduction . .7 2.3 Methods . 10 2.3.1 Hierarchical Merger Spin Distribution . 10 2.3.2 Mixture Model Analysis . 14 2.4 Results . 20 2.5 Conclusion . 24 3 WHERE ARE LIGO'S BIG BLACK HOLES? . 25 3.1 Abstract . 26 3.2 Introduction . 27 3.3 Sensitive volume . 31 3.4 Fitting the Mass Distribution . 34 3.5 Results . 38 3.5.1 Non-detection of heavy BBHs . 38 3.5.2 Bayesian evidence in favor of mass gap . 40 3.5.3 Joint power law{maximum mass fit . 43 3.6 Discussion . 47 3.6.1 Effect of Redshift Evolution . 47 3.6.2 Distribution of mass ratios . 48 3.6.3 Extending to non-power-law mass distributions . 49 3.6.4 Are there BBHs beyond the gap? . 49 3.7 Conclusion . 50 4 DOES THE BLACK HOLE MERGER RATE EVOLVE WITH REDSHIFT? . 52 4.1 Abstract . 53 4.2 Introduction . 54 4.3 Detected redshift distribution . 55 4.4 Joint Mass-redshift Model . 58 4.4.1 Redshift Model A . -
Parquet Theory in Nuclear Structure Calculations
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives Parquet theory in nuclear structure calculations Elise Bergli Thesis submitted to the degree of Philosophiae Doctor Department of Physics University of Oslo February 2010 © Elise Bergli, 2010 Series of dissertations submitted to the Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo No. 926 ISSN 1501-7710 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without permission. Cover: Inger Sandved Anfinsen. Printed in Norway: AiT e-dit AS. Produced in co-operation with Unipub. The thesis is produced by Unipub merely in connection with the thesis defence. Kindly direct all inquiries regarding the thesis to the copyright holder or the unit which grants the doctorate. Acknowledgements This thesis is primarily, of course, my own work. It has taken quite some time, not all of it pleasant, and I look forward to finally be doing something else. However, looking back, there are several people whom I would like to thank. Without them, I would not have been able to finish. First of all, I thank my adviser Morten Hjorth-Jensen. You have pro- vided more advise and encouragement than most advisers, being accessible and ready to answer questions at almost all times, regardless of time or place. I have really learned a lot from you these years. And I would also like to thank my co-adviser Eivind Osnes for pleasant discussions and having such an immense amount of literature available. -
NEWSLETTER NO. 81 February 1990
DNPDNP NEWSLETTER NO. 81 February 1990 TO: MEMBERS OF THE DIVISION OF NUCLEAR PHYSICS, APS FROM: VIRGINIA R. BROWN, LLNL, SECRETARY-TREASURER, DNP Komoto, Robert Lanier, Mohammed G. Mustafa, and Betty ACCOMPANYING THIS NEWSLETTER : Voelker, all of LLNL. The members of the 1990 Executive Committee (except for the Division Councillor, terms end 16-19 April APS meeting, Washington DC: at the Spring APS meeting following the year indicated) are as follows: • A listing of the Symposia of the DNP, the invited speakers, and titles of their talks. James B. Ball, ORNL, Chairman (1991) Gerard M. Crawley, Michigan State University, Vice- 24-27 October DNP Meeting, Urbana-Champaign: Chairman (1991) Virginia R. Brown, LLNL, Secretary-Treasurer (1991) • A nomination form for invited speakers. Gerald T. Garvey, LANL, Division Councillor, (1993) • A pre-registration form which includes workshops John Cameron, IUCF (1992) and banquet. Bunny C. Clark, Ohio State University (1991) • A housing form. Robert A. Eisenstein, University of Illinois, Past • United Airlines discount information. Chairman (1991) • A Poster. Wick C. Haxton, University of Washington (1991) Noemie Benczer-Koller, Rutgers University (1992) Jerry A. Nolen, Jr., Michigan State University (1991) Peter D. Parker, Yale University (1992) UTURE EADLINES F D 2. COMMITTEES OF THE DNP • 1 April 1990 - APS Fellowship Nominations (see item 9). The terms of some of the members of the following • 11 May 1990 -Nomination forms for invited speakers DNP committees expire in April 1990: Program, for the Urbana-Champaign meeting. Fellowship, Nominating, Nuclear Science Resources, and • 20 June 1990 - Abstracts for Urbana-Champaign "Physics News". Suggestions from the DNP membership meeting (See item 7). -
The Yet-Unobserved GW Universe
The Yet-Unobserved GW Universe Astro2020 Science White Paper THE YET-UNOBSERVED MULTI-MESSENGER GRAVITATIONAL-WAVE UNIVERSE Thematic Areas: Formation and Evolution of Compact Objects • Stars and Stellar Evolution • Multi-Messenger Astronomy and Astrophysics • Principal Author: Name: Vicky Kalogera Institution: Northwestern U. Email: [email protected] Phone: +1-847-491-5669 Lead Co-authors: Marrie-Anne Bizouard (CNRS, OCA), Adam Burrows (Princeton U.), Thomas Janka (MPA), Kei Kotake (Fukuoka U.), Bronson Messer (ORNL & U. Tennessee), Tony Mezza- cappa (ORNL & U. Tennessee), Bernhard Mueller (Monash U.), Ewald Mueller (MPA), Maria Alessandra Papa (AEI), Sanjay Reddy (U. Washington), Stephan Rosswog (Stockholms U.) Click here for other co-authors and supporters 2 The Yet-unobserved Multi-messenger Gravitational-wave Universe Black holes (BHs) and neutron stars (NSs) have already been detected as chirping gravitational-wave (GW) sources [1, 2], the latter also as a multi-messenger (MM) source with emission across the electromagnetic spectrum [3]. However, BHs and NSs are predicted to be GW sources of burst or continuous-wave character, in isolation or in binary systems. These GW sources can also be MM sources, and combined MM observations will reveal richer details of the source astrophysics. Signal strengths are highly uncertain, but generally low, low enough that detection with the 2nd-generation detectors even at design sensitivity are far from guaranteed, if not impossible. Third-generation GW detectors will be necessary certainly for the reliable study of (i) bursts from the birth of compact objects when massive stars collapse as core-collapse supernovae (ccSN), (ii) bursts from magnetars or glitching radio pulsars, (iii) continuous GWs from NSs, isolated or in interacting binaries. -
Electron-Ion Collider Science
BOARD ON PHYSICS AND ASTRONOMY (BPA) An Assessment of U.S.-Based Electron-Ion Collider Science A study under the auspices of the U.S. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine Gordon Baym and Ani Aprahamian, Co-Chairs The study is supported by funding from the DOE Office of Science. (Further information can be found at: https://www.nap.edu/25171) The National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine The National Academies produce reports that shape policies, inform public opinion, and advance the pursuit of science, engineering, and medicine. The present report is carried out under the leadership of the Board on Physics and Astronomy (James Lancaster, Director). The BPA seeks to inform the government and the public about what is needed to continue the advancement of physics and astronomy and why doing so is important. Committee on Assessment of U.S.-Based Electron-Ion Collider Science The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine was asked by the U.S. Department of Energy to assess the scientific justification for building an Electron-Ion Collider (EIC) facility. The unanimous conclusion of the Committee is that an EIC, as envisioned in this report, would be… … a unique facility in the world that would answer science questions that are compelling, fundamental, and timely, and help maintain U.S. scientific leadership in nuclear physics. What is an Electron-Ion Collider? An advanced accelerator that collides beams of electrons with beams of protons or heavier ions (atomic nuclei). Electron-ion center of mass energy ~20-100 GeV, upgradable to ~140 GeV. High luminosity and polarization! 1) highly polarized electrons, E ~ 4 GeV to possibly 20 GeV 2) highly polarized protons, E ~ 30 GeV to some 300 GeV, and heavier ions Brookhaven Jefferson Lab Two possible configurations: Brookhaven Nat’l Lab and Jefferson Lab Committee Statement of Task -- from DOE to the BPA The committee will assess the scientific justification for a U.S. -
Visit the National Academies Press Online, the Authoritative Source for All Books from the National Academy of Sciences, The
Panel Reports--New Worlds, New Horizons in Astronomy and Astrophysics Science Frontiers Panels; Program Prioritization Panels; Committee for a Decadal Survey of Astronomy and Astrophysics; National Research Council ISBN: 0-309-15963-6, 547 pages, 7 x 10, (2010) This free PDF was downloaded from: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/12982.html Visit the National Academies Press online, the authoritative source for all books from the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, the Institute of Medicine, and the National Research Council: • Download hundreds of free books in PDF • Read thousands of books online, free • Sign up to be notified when new books are published • Purchase printed books • Purchase PDFs • Explore with our innovative research tools Thank you for downloading this free PDF. If you have comments, questions or just want more information about the books published by the National Academies Press, you may contact our customer service department toll-free at 888-624-8373, visit us online, or send an email to [email protected]. This free book plus thousands more books are available at http://www.nap.edu. Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for noncommercial, educational purposes, provided that this notice appears on the reproduced materials, the Web address of the online, full authoritative version is retained, and copies are not altered. To disseminate otherwise or to republish requires written permission from the National Academies Press. Panel Reports--New Worlds, New Horizons in Astronomy and Astrophysics http://www.nap.edu/catalog/12982.html PREPUBLICATION COPY Subject to Further Editorial Correction Panel Reports⎯New Worlds, New Horizons in Astronomy and Astrophysics Science Frontiers Panels Program Prioritization Panels Committee for a Decadal Survey of Astronomy and Astrophysics Board on Physics and Astronomy Space Studies Board Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS Washington, D.C. -
Laboratory Mesurements in Nuclear Astrophysics
Seoul National University, Muju Resort, Korea, 20-25 August, 1993 ASTROPHYSICS SUMMER SCHOOL(S) - 1993, LECTURES ON: LABORATORY MEASUREMENTS IN NUCLEAR ASTROPHYSICS Moshe Gai1 A.W. Wright Nuclear Structure Laboratory, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511 Abstract After reviewing some of the basic concepts, nomenclatures and parametrizations of Astronomy, Astrophysics and Cosmology, we introduce a few central problems in Nu- clear Astrophysics, including the hot-CNO cycle, helium burning and solar neutrino’s. We demonstrate that Secondary (Radioactive) Nuclear Beams allow for con- siderable progress on these problems. Table of Content: 1. Introduction 2. Scales and Classification of Stars 3. Reaction Theory, Methods and Applications: The PP processes The CNO and hot-CNO cycles Burning processes in massive stars arXiv:nucl-th/9405020v1 18 May 1994 4. Central Problems in Nuclear Astrophysics: Solar neutrino’s and the 7Be(p,γ)8B reaction The hot-CNO cycle and the 13N(p,γ)14O reaction Helium burning and the 12C(α,γ)16O reaction 5. Solutions [with secondary (radioactive) beams]: Direct and indirect measurements of the 13N(p,γ)14O reaction Helium burning from the beta-delayed alpha-emission of 16N The Coulomb Dissociation of 14O and 8B 1Permanent Address: Dept. of Physics, University of Connecticut, U-46, 2152 Hillside Dr.,Storrs, CT 06269-3046, [email protected], [email protected]. 1 INTRODUCTION In this lecture notes I will discuss some aspects of Nuclear Astrophysics and Labora- tory measurements of nuclear processes which are of central value for stellar evolution and models of cosmology. These reaction rates are important for several reason.