Proposed UGC- Minor Research Project

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Proposed UGC- Minor Research Project Introduction Regional disparity is a ubiquitous phenomenon in both developed and developing economies. But in the latter it is more acute and glaring. When economic development occurs unequally across a country, regional differences in the levels of living become an important political issue. State economies are often composed of sets of smaller and localized economies. If the national economy is to prosper then its constituent regional economies must be brought into some sort of harmony. Any attempt to implement regional balanced -growth strategy, it is necessary to identify nature and pattern of regional development, the availability of basic amenities and the quality of infrastructure available. In Uttar Pradesh too, area disparities in the level of poverty, unemployment, income, infrastructure, agriculture, industry and above all the level of living of people exist substantially across the regions. Numerous measures have been undertaken in the last sixty years of planning to achieve balanced regional development of the State, yet wide disparities in area development continues in this state. In the regional analysis of development one comes across regions which are well developed and the peopl e in such region enjoy reasonable standard of living while in others, resource utilization and development is low owing to historical circumstances or other wise, resulting in the underdeveloped of the region whereby people have a poor 1 standard of living. The problem of imbalance in regional development thus assumes a great significance. Regional development, therefore, is interpreted as intra-regional development design to solve the problems of regions lagging behind. The first connotation of regional is e conomic in which the differences in growth, in volume and structure of production, income, and employment are taken as the measure of economic progress. However, recently it has been argued that merely economic criteria cannot explain the level of development, which is multidimensional concept. Therefore, such variables or criteria should also be employed which indicate progress on technological, social and cultural fronts. Thus development means progress throughout the society. However, at the base of development process lies the progress in different sectors of the economy. Developing agriculture and reducing gaps between regions with regard to the efficiency of the agricultural system can only achieve regional development in an overwhelming agricultural situation. Progress in agriculture releases resources, labour as well as capital for use in industry and services. Progress in agriculture also leads to the modernization and social development and better level of living through education and generating propensity other than agricultural goods. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE The earliest study in the level of development was made by Schwartzberg (1962). The use of a composite index of development brought out areal differences in the levels of development, althoug h these differences 2 could not be further put rigorous regional analysis as the data were on the basis of states (prior to 1956) which are not ideally suited to reveal regional differences. Pal (1965) put a more systematic attempt in the construction of a composite index of selected variables, which permits several stages of analysis in relation to the group of variables contributing to overall development; with a study of All India level it may be regarded essentially as a contribution to methodology in areal differentiation by factor analysis. Mitra (1965) has grouped 324 districts of India into four levels of development. For this study he has selected 63 variables and these variables were grouped into six convenient blocks. The variables pertain to natural factors, agricultural infrastructure, traditional economy, human resources, organized industry etc. This study is unique for its simplicity and systematic approach. Nath (1970) on the basis of state and district level data worked out the regional patterns of economic development and economic growth within India. Analysis of the level of economic development has been made only for the states. The level of economic development of states has been measured in two ways: (i) on the basis of per cap ita income, and (ii) through the use of a composite index of economic development based on four indicators. Analysis of economic growth has been made with the help of data on growth rates of population, agricultural output, and per capita value added in the industry, and per capita income. He mapped the states of India into two categories of relatively developed and less developed. Prakash (1977) assessed the regional inequalities and economic development in relation to infrastructural facilities in Indi a. He selected several infrastructural factors: the various population characteristics that reflect the development of infrastructure determinants of industrialization, the development of power, irrigation and agricultural implements and road transportation, communication and banking services. He obtained two important conclusions from the analysis of development of individual regions 3 in various fields: (i) there is no region, which is equally developed or underdeveloped in all fields. (ii) the other impo rtant result is that the some region/regions come under the category of underdeveloped region if some other indicator relating to the same field is used for classification. It implies that an appropriate indicator should be chosen to determine the stage o f development of the regions. Hemlata Rao (1984) while studying the regional disparities, dimensions and typology of backwardness in Karnataka applied the technique of factor analysis in delineating the regions. The study covers 175 talukas (villages) of Karnataka and examines inter taluka diversities in the land utilization pattern, cropping pattern, agricultural development, pattern of industrial spread, and industrial developments, level of development of education, health, transport, communication, power, banking and cooperative sectors and overall development level during period between 1975 -76 and 1979-80. The study concludes that in Karnataka there is not only wide diversity in natural endowments but also wide disparities in the levels of secto ral and aggregate development. All backward regions are not the same rather they have different dimensions and typology of backwardness. The causes of backwardness also vary from region to region. Levels of socioeconomic development and regional development may show many dimensions of progress and backwardness. Therefore, the present study may found similarities and differences among different areas of Uttar Pradesh in respect of socioeconomic development. The most accepted and yet the most complex task of regional planning is to prepare a comprehensive regional development plan. The present study will help to prepare an integrated plan between the economic and social components in a given region and interregional, that is between different levels of regions. Regional planning is strongly advocated where there are conflicts arising out of administrative jurisdiction, resource patterns and sharp contrasts in the levels of development between regions of an Uttar Pradesh, which is in the process of development. 4 Hence, the researchers of the present investigation have made a humble attempt to find out the causes and consequences of regional disparity in socio-economic development of Uttar Pradesh. OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY The present study attempts to assess the existing level of socio- economic development in Uttar Pradesh, leading to the identification of regions having unequal share of socio-economic development. The specific objectives are as follows: 1. To analyze the existing levels of socio-economic development in the region. 2. To examine spatial distribution of socio-economic development in relation to their correlates. 3. Determination of levels of development at district levels on the basis of socio-economic development of the region. 4. To suggest a suitable strategy for accelerating the overall development of the region. HYPOTHESIS Corresponding to the objectives of the present research, the following null hypotheses have been framed for empirical verification and it has been verified: H.01: There would be no significant regional disparity in socio -economic development of Uttar Pradesh (District wise and Region wise) H.02: There would be no significant relationship between socio-economic development and regional disparity in Uttar Pradesh. METHODOLOGY: Data Collection: The study pertains to 70 districts of Uttar Pradesh. The secondary data is collected from the published and unpublished records, viz. census 5 reports, and revenue records, district statistical year books, the data kept at the state, district, tehsil and block headquarters. The data, which are not available through secondary sources, is collected through field surveys. The data is collected from National Information Centre (NIC) and Statistical Division, Department of Planning, Niyojan Bhavan, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh. As the district is a unit of analysis in this study, the data will also procure at the district level from district Statistical Division. Data Analysis: Since the focus of the study is on the economic and socia l dimensions of the development, the levels of development in this study are to be examined in the following specific indicators. A. Social Development B. Agricultural Development C. Industrial Development The first two encompass
Recommended publications
  • Answered On:02.12.2002 Discovery of Ancient Site by Asi Chandra Vijay Singh
    GOVERNMENT OF INDIA TOURISM AND CULTURE LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION NO:2136 ANSWERED ON:02.12.2002 DISCOVERY OF ANCIENT SITE BY ASI CHANDRA VIJAY SINGH Will the Minister of TOURISM AND CULTURE be pleased to state: (a) names of the monuments in the Moradabad and Bareilly division under ASI; (b) whether Excavations conducted at Madarpur in Moradabad District of Uttar Pradesh have unearthed an archaeological site dating to 2nd century B.C.; (c) steps taken for preservation of the site and the amount allocated for the purpose; and (d) steps proposed to be taken to further explore to excavate the area? Answer MINISTER FOR TOURISM AND CULTURE (SHRI JAGMOHAN ) (a) A list of Centrally protected monuments in Moradabad and Bareilly division is annexed. (b) The excavation conducted in January, 2000 revealed findings datable to 2nd millennium B.C. (c) & (d) Steps have been taken to conserve the site. An amount of Rs.1,84,093/- has been incurred so far. Further steps have been initiated to explore adjacent areas to assess its archaeological potentiality. ANNEXURE ANNEXURE REFFERED TO IN REPLY OF LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION NO.2136 TO BE ANSWERED ON 2.12.2002 REGARDING DISCOVERY OF ANCIENT SITE BY ASI (a) Moradabad Division (i) Moradabad District: S.No. Locality Name of the Centrally Protected Monument/Site 1. Alipur, Tehsil :Chandausi Amarpati Khera 2. Alipur, Tehsil:Chandausi Chandesvara Khera 3. Berni, Tehsil;Chandausi Khera or Mound reputed to be the ruin or palace or Raja Vena 4. Bherabharatpur, Tehsil Amorha Large mound, the site of an ancient temple 5.
    [Show full text]
  • UTTAR PRADESH October 2007
    UTTAR PRADESH October 2007 www.ibef.org STATE ECONOMY & SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE www.ibef.org STATE ECONOMY & SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE UTTAR PRADESH • October 2007 Uttar Pradesh – A Snapshot • Located in the Northern region of India, Uttar Pradesh has a population of 166 million, making it India’s most populous state (16% of India) • Occupies an area of 240, 928 sq km (9% of India) • The State covers a large part of the highly fertile and densely populated upper Gangetic plain • Shares an international border with Nepal Saharanpur and is bounded by the Indian states of UTUTTARAKHANDT A R ANC H AL Muzaffarnagar Uttarakhand, Himachal Pradesh, Haryana, Delhi, Bijnor Bagpat Meerut J.P.Nagar Rampur Ghaziabad DE L H I Gautam Moradabad Bareilly Pilibhit Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Buddha Nagar BAREILY Bulandshahr NEPAL Budaun Lakhimpur H A R Y A NA Aligarh Shahjahanpur Kheri B ahraich Jharkhand and Bihar Mathura Hathras Etah Farrukhabad Sitapur Shr avasti M A T H UR A Balrampur Hardoi Maharajgunj Firozabad Siddharth Agra Mainpuri Kannauj Lucknow Gonda Nagar Khushi E tawah Unnao Barabanki Basti Gorakhpuri Nagar • The state is divided into 74 districts 300 tehsils, R A J A ST H AN KanLpuUr C K NOW S.K.Nagar A ur aiya Kanpur Faizabad Dehat Nagar Ambedkar Deoria K A NPUR Raebareli Sultanpur Nagar Jalaun Azamgarh Mau and 813 community blocks Fatehpur Ballia Pratapgarh Hamirpur Jaunpur Jhansi Kaushambi G hazipur J H ANSI Banda Mahoba A L L AH A B AD Varanasi S.R .Nagar B I H A R Chitrakoot V A R A NASI Allahabad • Administrative and Legislative
    [Show full text]
  • Section-VIII : Laboratory Services
    Section‐VIII Laboratory Services 8. Laboratory Services 8.1 Haemoglobin Test ‐ State level As can be seen from the graph, hemoglobin test is being carried out at almost every FRU studied However, 10 percent medical colleges do not provide the basic Hb test. Division wise‐ As the graph shows, 96 percent of the FRUs on an average are offering this service, with as many as 13 divisions having 100 percent FRUs contacted providing basic Hb test. Hemoglobin test is not available at District Women Hospital (Mau), District Women Hospital (Budaun), CHC Partawal (Maharajganj), CHC Kasia (Kushinagar), CHC Ghatampur (Kanpur Nagar) and CHC Dewa (Barabanki). 132 8.2 CBC Test ‐ State level Complete Blood Count (CBC) test is being offered at very few FRUs. While none of the sub‐divisional hospitals are having this facility, only 25 percent of the BMCs, 42 percent of the CHCs and less than half of the DWHs contacted are offering this facility. Division wise‐ As per the graph above, only 46 percent of the 206 FRUs studied across the state are offering CBC (Complete Blood Count) test service. None of the FRUs in Jhansi division is having this service. While 29 percent of the health facilities in Moradabad division are offering this service, most others are only a shade better. Mirzapur (83%) followed by Gorakhpur (73%) are having maximum FRUs with this facility. CBC test is not available at Veerangna Jhalkaribai Mahila Hosp Lucknow (Lucknow), Sub Divisional Hospital Sikandrabad, Bullandshahar, M.K.R. HOSPITAL (Kanpur Nagar), LBS Combined Hosp (Varanasi),
    [Show full text]
  • MAP:Muzaffarnagar(Uttar Pradesh)
    77°10'0"E 77°20'0"E 77°30'0"E 77°40'0"E 77°50'0"E 78°0'0"E 78°10'0"E MUZAFFARNAGAR DISTRICT GEOGRAPHICAL AREA (UTTAR PRADESH) 29°50'0"N KEY MAP HARIDWAR 29°50'0"N ± SAHARANPUR HARDWAR BIJNOR KARNAL SAHARANPUR CA-04 TO CA-01 CA-02 W A RDS CA-06 RO O CA-03 T RK O CA-05 W E A R PANIPAT D S N A N A 29°40'0"N Chausana Vishat Aht. U U T T OW P *# P A BAGHPAT Purquazi (NP) E MEERUT R A .! G R 29°40'0"N Jhabarpur D A W N *# R 6 M S MD Garhi Abdullakhan DR 1 Sohjani Umerpur G *# 47 D A E *#W C D Total Population within the Geographical Area as per 2011 A O A O N B 41.44 Lacs.(Approx.) R AL R A KARNAL N W A Hath Chhoya N B Barla T Jalalabad (NP) 63 A D TotalGeographicalArea(Sq.KMs) No.ChargeAreas O AW 1 S *# E O W H *#R A B .! R Kutesra A A 4077 6 Bunta Dhudhli D A Kasoli D RD N R *#M OA S A Pindaura Jahangeerpur*# *# *# K TH Hasanpur Lahari D AR N *# S Khudda O N O *# H Charge Areas Identification Tahsil Names A *# L M 5 Thana Bhawan(Rural) DR 10 9 CA-01 Kairana Un (NP) W *#.! Chhapar Tajelhera CA-02 Shamli .! Thana Bhawan (NP) Beheri *# *# CA-03 Budhana Biralsi *# Majlishpur Nojal Njali *# Basera *# *# *# CA-04 Muzaffarnagar Sikari CA-05 Khatauli Harar Fatehpur Maisani Ismailpur *# *# Roniharji Pur Charthaval (NP) *# CA-06 Jansath *# .! Charthawal Rural Garhi Pukhta (NP) Sonta Rasoolpur Kulheri 3W *# Sisona Datiyana Gadla Luhari Rampur*# *# .! 7 *# *# *# *# *# Bagowali Hind MDR 16 SH 5 Hiranwara Nagala Pithora Nirdhna *# Jhinjhana (NP) Bhainswala *# Silawar *# *# *# Sherpur Bajheri Ratheri LEGEND .! *# *# Kairi *# Malaindi Sikka Chhetela *# *#
    [Show full text]
  • Uttar Pradesh (UP) Dominates, and Indeed Is Often
    Chapter - 1 Uttar Pradesh : An Overview ttar Pradesh (UP) dominates, and indeed is often Box 1.1: Salient Demographic and Economic Features U seen to represent, the region described as the “Hindi- of the State speaking heartland” of India. UP’s population is the highest in the country and it is the fifth largest State. 1 Population, (crore) 2001 16.62 On November 9, 2000, 13 districts of the Hill region 2 Geographical area (lakh sq.km.) 2001 2.41 as well as the district of Hardwar in the west were 3 Population density (per sq.km.) 2001 689 reconstituted into the new State of Uttaranchal. At the 4 Forest area (lakh ha.) 2001-02 16.9 moment, UP covers 240928 sq.kms. and accounts for 7.3 5 Culturable waste/usar land (lakh ha.) 2001-02 11.1 percent of total area of the country, while its share in country’s population is 16.2 percent. UP is organized into 6 Fallow land (lakh ha.) 2001-02 16.5 70 districts, 300 tehsils and 813 development blocks. There 7 Cultivated Land (lakh ha.) 2001-02 168.1 are 52028 village panchayats in the State covering 97134 8 Percentage share in total workers (2001) inhabited villages. The majority of UP’s villages are small, 1. Agriculture 66.0 with an average population of around 3194 per panchayat. 2. House hold Industries 6.0 Situated in the Indo-Gangetic plain and intersected 3. Other services 28.0 by rivers, UP has had a long history of human settlement. 9 Percentage share in State Income The fertile plains of the Ganga have led to a high (2002-03) population density and the dominance of agriculture as an economic activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Knowledge Extent of Management Practices About Mango Cultivation In
    Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2017; 6(3): 27-29 E-ISSN: 2278-4136 P-ISSN: 2349-8234 Knowledge extent of management practices about JPP 2017; 6(3): 27-29 Received: 15-03-2017 mango cultivation in Saharanpur district (U.P.) Accepted: 16-04-2017 Mohit Kumar Mohit Kumar, SN Singh, Abhishek Kumar, RR Yadav, RK Doharey and Department of Extension Education Narendra Deva Manoj Kumar University of Agriculture & Technology, Kumarganj, Abstract Faizabad, Uttar Pradesh, India This study was conducted in Rampur Maniharan Block of district Saharanpur selected purposively. A total number of 100 Mango growers were selected through random sampling from five villages. The SN Singh structured schedule was developed keeping in view the objectives and variable to be studied. The S.M.S (Agriculture Extension) respondents were contacted personally for data collection. Out of 10 cultivation practices i.e. agricultural K.V.K Masodha Faizabad, Uttar st Pradesh, India practices of Mango cultivation, Field preparation (87.56%) was rank at 1 as far as knowledge possessed nd by the respondents was concerned. The practice Fertilizer application rank at 2 (85.45%), followed by rd th Abhishek Kumar High yielding varieties at rank 3 (76.56%), Intercropping and weed management at rank 4 (67.45%), Department of Extension Irrigation management at rank 5th (66.21%), Plant protection measures at rank 6th (61.23%), Harvesting Education Narendra Deva and marketing at rank 7th (59.11%), Transplanting at rank 8th (48.43%), Recommended spacing at rank University of Agriculture & 9th (45.09%) and Plant growth regulators at rank 10th (25.89%), respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Converting Dry Latrines in the District of Budaun, Uttar Pradesh
    Converting Dry Latrines in the District of Budaun, Uttar Pradesh: A Story of Commitment, Determination and Dignity An Intiative of the District Administration, Budaun, UP August, 2011 This initiative of District Administration, Budaun was documented by UNICEF Office for Uttar Pradesh in August, 2011 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In July 2010, a survey initiated by the district administration in rural Budaun estimated there were around 50,000 dry latrines. This meant there were about 3,00,000 users and at least 2,000 women engaged in manual scavenging across the district. The administration was moved to conduct this survey following the visit of Amit Gupta (District Magistrate, Budaun August 2009 – June 2011) to Ramzanpur, a village estimated to have more than 1200 dry latrines. The Budaun district administration took on the task of converting all dry latrines to pour flush toilets in a campaign mode: over 47,000 dry latrines have been converted in less than one year. Much of the district is now free of this practice, and work is under way to ensure the task is completed in the entire district. A dry latrine is a place to defecate in the house, which is cleaned once a day by a scavenger who removes the faeces and discards it in a field outside the village. Almost all scavengers are women and girls. Proximity of the dry latrine to living space in homes causes serious health hazards, especially among children who have a lower immunity. The campaign owes its success to the determination and commitment of a dynamic District Magistrate. Forging partnerships with multiple stakeholders, effective community mobilisation, mobilisation of all the departments falling under the district administration, quick rehabilitation of scavengers are all elements that have made this campaign a success.
    [Show full text]
  • PLAGUE Amérique
    — 293 — Notifications reçues du 27 mai au 2 juin 1966 — Notifications received from 27 May to 2 June 1966 PESTE — PLAGUE Asie — Asia C D c D C D INDE (suite) 17-23.IV 24-30.IV 1-7.V C D Amérique -- America INDIA (continued) VIET-NAM, REP. 22-28.V C D Bihar, State Nhatrang (PA) . 1 0 ÉQUATEUR — ECUADOR Saigon (excl. PA) . Is 0 Districts Darbhanga......................... 16/7 7p Chimborazo, Province 15-2I.V Hazanbagh ..................... 1 p Op Muzzaffarpur..................... 14P 4 p Alausi, Canton Darlac, Province Saharsa .... 36p 9p Achupallas, Parr. 6-12.UI 2 0 Banmethuot.............. 12j 0 Gujarat, State Chunchi, Canton Ninh-Thuân, Province Districts Chunchi, Parr. 17-23.IV 3 l Ahmedabad . 6p Op 12p Op Phanrang, District . 9s 0 Baroda ............................. ip Op K a ir a ................................. Ip Op El Oro, Province S u r a t ............... 42p 2p 32p ip 43p Op Ârenillas, Canton Mehsana ■ 21.V Victoria, Parr. 6-12.UI 4 0 CHOLÉRA — CHOLERA Kerala, State Pinas, Canton Trivandrum, D.................... 1P ip Marcabeli, Parr. 3-9.IV 1 0 Asie — Asia Madras, State Loja, Province C D Districts Calvas, Canton BIRMANIE — BURMA 22-28.V Chingleput . Ip Op Amaluza, Parr. 24-30.IV 1 0 M adurai............................. 1P Op ip ôp Tiruchirapalli...................... 4p Op Bassein ( P ) ............... 7 0 Celica, Canton Rangoon (PA) (excl. A) 1 0 Kanyakumari ■ 21.V Pindal, Parr. 27.UI-2.IV 1 0 15-21.V Maharashtra, State Pozul, Parr. 6-12.UI 1 0 Pegu, Division Districts Macara, Canton Hanthawaddy, District 4 1 Ahmednagar..................... 2P Op Amravati Tacamoros, Parr.
    [Show full text]
  • District Census Handbook, Muzaffarnagar, Part XIII-A, Series-22, Uttar Pradesh
    CENSUS 1981 ~lrt XIII .. 3J "- "'~ ~ct f{"~ ~fl~ SRW #t~d;ft UTTAR PRADESH Par't XIII- A VILLAGE & TOWN DIRECTORY ~ 'W'if(OTPfT DISTRICT ~~ft~ MUZAFFARNAGAR DISTRICT CENSUS' HANDBOOK o.::~ilGt, • • 'lrornr ~mw.rif) ~ fi'f~~, :;r.{ifIJA'T 1ff~'9T'Wr'f't ~~I I I f '" ~~~~I , , Q , , U : cr , .... ," . I. i 4 ~ "'~<1;y 40 ~ J 1/11 r- ~ II1I I ~ II \. , I I1II I I1111 J : t 11 J I ~ 2 I 1111 I ~ UI,I~ I I 11> 1- I~ I, "- " ,£ 'I ~.' 0. , '/ (, J ,j II / I Z f~1,1 ,I if cr ~ < « )" 0 ~ a: ~ ,0 ~ " ~ ~ ~ N< ." ,) ,.! 1 0- 0 15~ '.\ ( u', '" "C a ~ ~~ ( ~~ ~ /~/ '0 ~' ~ « ~ ~ 0 .~ ~. U t-I rt: J,~ ~ 1/1 CI) ~ Q '." 'if 3. ~ <fiT ll~ 4. f~~ it 'i~~ arl~~ 5. furm ~;:rr ~1.!;f~C(i1 If)T crfl::q~ 6. fq!l~I.iUII~'lql ~r (afim it) 7 . ~'tfflf I -1;fJ1i ~fu<pr 17 -212 I. qh:rOir 21.-56 (i) .~ffi :q(",f.q~ (ii) ;;rnrT <tt ~if)lI ~.qr 22 (iii) q{-.:r f'1~fii[<t11 28 2 ~~q:q)~illT"t: 57-100 (i) ff6~')~ mrrf.;:r'!f (U) ~) om qUIY1?'li ,_,.ft 58 (iii) U'm ~CfiT 66 L ~r;RT. 101-124 (i) ~ ¥tliff.q~ •(ii: «11tT <tit 4 OJ T'f$:q ~ 102 ( iii) 1Xl1f ~fl1TCf)t 196 125-168 (i) d~~(:f' +It,,,,f~ .... (ii) vllff c€t qijl\1fi~ ~ 126 (iii) Vllf f.,afiftilj\l 134 I. fWa:rT, f::qfc:flffil -qct ar-'lf '§Ifeta-IOIT ii!iT aE[«l~C{I< ~ n.
    [Show full text]
  • Uttar Pradesh District Gazetteers: Muzaffarnagar
    GAZETTEER OF INDIA UTTAR PRADESH District Muzaffarnagar UTTAR PRADESH DISTRICT GAZETTEERS MUZAFFARNAGAR ■AHSLl PI AS a* TAR¥K I.AiSv State Editor Published by the Government of Uttar Pradesh (Department of District Gazetteers, U. P„ Lucknow) and Printed by Superintendent Printing & Stationery, U. p, at fbe Government Press, Rampur 1989 Price Rs. 52.00 PREFACE Earlier accounts regarding the Muzaffarnagar district are E. T. Atkinson’s Statistical, Descriptive and Histori¬ cal Account of the North-Western Provinces of India, Vol. II, (1875), various Settlement Reports of the region and H. R. Nevill’s Muzaffarnagar : A Gazetteer (Allahabad, 1903), and its supplements. The present Gazetteer of the district is the twenty- eighth in the series of revised District Gazetteers of the State of Uttar Pradesh which are being published under a scheme jointly sponsored and financed by the Union and the State Governments. A bibliography of the published works used in the preparation of this Gazetteer appears at its end. The census data of 1961 and 1971 have been made the basis for the statistics mentioned in the Gazetteer. I am grateful to the Chairman and members of the State Advisory Board, Dr P. N. Chopra, Ed.',tor, Gazetteers, Central Gazetteers Unit, Ministry of Education and Social Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi, and to all those officials and non-officials who have helped in the bringing out of this Gazetteer. D. P. VARUN l.UCKNOW : November 8, 1976 ADVISORY BOARD 1. Sri Swami Prasad Singh, Revenue Minister, Chairman Government of Uttar Pradesh 2. Sri G. C. Chaturvedi, Commissioner-eum- Viet-Chairmsn Secretary, Revenue Department 3.
    [Show full text]
  • “Everyone Has Been Silenced”; Police
    EVERYONE HAS BEEN SILENCED Police Excesses Against Anti-CAA Protesters In Uttar Pradesh, And The Post-violence Reprisal Citizens Against Hate Citizens against Hate (CAH) is a Delhi-based collective of individuals and groups committed to a democratic, secular and caring India. It is an open collective, with members drawn from a wide range of backgrounds who are concerned about the growing hold of exclusionary tendencies in society, and the weakening of rule of law and justice institutions. CAH was formed in 2017, in response to the rising trend of hate mobilisation and crimes, specifically the surge in cases of lynching and vigilante violence, to document violations, provide victim support and engage with institutions for improved justice and policy reforms. From 2018, CAH has also been working with those affected by NRC process in Assam, documenting exclusions, building local networks, and providing practical help to victims in making claims to rights. Throughout, we have also worked on other forms of violations – hate speech, sexual violence and state violence, among others in Uttar Pradesh, Haryana, Rajasthan, Bihar and beyond. Our approach to addressing the justice challenge facing particularly vulnerable communities is through research, outreach and advocacy; and to provide practical help to survivors in their struggles, also nurturing them to become agents of change. This citizens’ report on police excesses against anti-CAA protesters in Uttar Pradesh is the joint effort of a team of CAH made up of human rights experts, defenders and lawyers. Members of the research, writing and advocacy team included (in alphabetical order) Abhimanyu Suresh, Adeela Firdous, Aiman Khan, Anshu Kapoor, Devika Prasad, Fawaz Shaheen, Ghazala Jamil, Mohammad Ghufran, Guneet Ahuja, Mangla Verma, Misbah Reshi, Nidhi Suresh, Parijata Banerjee, Rehan Khan, Sajjad Hassan, Salim Ansari, Sharib Ali, Sneha Chandna, Talha Rahman and Vipul Kumar.
    [Show full text]
  • Answered On:23.07.2003 Mobile Phone Service in Uttar Pradesh S
    GOVERNMENT OF INDIA COMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION NO:394 ANSWERED ON:23.07.2003 MOBILE PHONE SERVICE IN UTTAR PRADESH S. SAIDUZZAMAN Will the Minister of COMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY be pleased to state: (a) the number of BSNL`s mobile phone users in Uttar Pradesh as on June 30, 2003, district-wise; (b) whether the Government are aware of the fact that mobile services are not functioning properly i n rural areas of district Muzaffaranagar and Azamgarh; (c) if so, the step being taken by the Government for the installation of Mobile Towers in Thekma Exchange of Azamgarh and in rural and urban areas of Muzaffarnagar ; and (d) the time by which mobile tower is likely to be installed in Thekma Exchange? Answer THE MINISTER OF STATE IN THE MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY(SHRI ASHOK PRADHAN) (a) BSNL has provided 1,94,404 Cellular Mobile connections covering 47 Districts in UP (East) and 1,50,769 connections covering 23 Districts in UP (West) as per the Annexure. (b) Cellular Mobile services have been launched so far commercially viable areas only and rural are not covered. Accordingly Khatauli, Shamli, Jasoi and Muzaffarnagar cities of District Muzaffarnagar and Azamgarh city have been provided with mobile service, which is working satisfactorily in these areas. (c) Sir, no Mobile services have been planned for Thekma in Azamagarh District and in rural areas of Muzaffarnagar District in the year 2003-04. However, it is planned to cover Budhana town in Muzaffarnagar District in this year. (d) Does not arise in view of (c) above.
    [Show full text]