Rubus Proprietary Red Blend Australia Rubus Project Australia - South Australia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Rubus Proprietary Red Blend Australia Rubus Project Australia - South Australia A blend of Rubired, Durif & Shiraz varieties: Rubired is a cross between Tinto Cao and Alicante Ganzin (which is itself a cross between Alicante Bouschet and Aramon Rupestris Ganzin). It is known for being particularly adapted to the hot climate and producing dark wines, as the color is not only coming from the grape's skin, but also from the grape juice itself. It was developed in 1958 by H.P. Olmo of the University of California Davis. Durif, also known as Petite Sirah, is also a cross of two different grape varietals: Syrah and Peloursin. It was created by French botanist Francois Durif in 1860 while keeping Syrah and Peloursin plants under the same roof; it happened from a natural process called "cross-pollination." The grape itself is known for its very aromatic, plummy character. Shiraz, which we all know for being the most recognized grape varietal of Australia, brings some minty, spicy and fruity characteristics to the wines. Deep, dark ruby color with aromas of blue fruit, confectionery and subtle licorice characters. Thick luscious palate with good structure and soft finish. Specifications Varietals 44% Rubired, 31% Durif and 25% Shiraz Certifications Pairings BBQ lamb with roast vegetables. Codes, Weights and Measures UPC 7 84585 01735 5 Units/Case 12 Unit Size 750 mL Container bottle SCC 1 07 84585 01735 2 Case Weight 37 Cases/Pallet 56 Layers/Pallet 14 ABV 13.50% SRP $ 15.99 USD 750mL Bottle Reviews and News 2014 Rubus Proprietary Red Reserve - 87 PTS - WINE VALUE - WA 2021.09.28 - Kysela Pere et Fils, LTD. - www.kysela.com Page 1.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Determining the Classification of Vine Varieties Has Become Difficult to Understand Because of the Large Whereas Article 31
31 . 12 . 81 Official Journal of the European Communities No L 381 / 1 I (Acts whose publication is obligatory) COMMISSION REGULATION ( EEC) No 3800/81 of 16 December 1981 determining the classification of vine varieties THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Whereas Commission Regulation ( EEC) No 2005/ 70 ( 4), as last amended by Regulation ( EEC) No 591 /80 ( 5), sets out the classification of vine varieties ; Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, Whereas the classification of vine varieties should be substantially altered for a large number of administrative units, on the basis of experience and of studies concerning suitability for cultivation; . Having regard to Council Regulation ( EEC) No 337/79 of 5 February 1979 on the common organization of the Whereas the provisions of Regulation ( EEC) market in wine C1), as last amended by Regulation No 2005/70 have been amended several times since its ( EEC) No 3577/81 ( 2), and in particular Article 31 ( 4) thereof, adoption ; whereas the wording of the said Regulation has become difficult to understand because of the large number of amendments ; whereas account must be taken of the consolidation of Regulations ( EEC) No Whereas Article 31 of Regulation ( EEC) No 337/79 816/70 ( 6) and ( EEC) No 1388/70 ( 7) in Regulations provides for the classification of vine varieties approved ( EEC) No 337/79 and ( EEC) No 347/79 ; whereas, in for cultivation in the Community ; whereas those vine view of this situation, Regulation ( EEC) No 2005/70 varieties
[Show full text]
Christianbrothers00timorich.Pdf
rafrM^ University of California Berkeley . All uses of this manuscript are covered by a legal agreement between the Regents of the University of California and Brother Timothy, dated 5 March, 1974. The manuscript is thereby made available for research purposes. All literary rights in the manuscript, including the right to publish, are reserved to The Bancroft Library of the University of California at Berkeley. No part of the manuscript may be quoted for publication without the written permission of the Director of The Bancroft Library of the University of California at Berkeley. Requests for permission to quote for publication should be addressed to the Regional Oral History Office, 486 Library, and should include identification of the specific passages to be quoted, anticipated use of the passages, and identification of the user. The legal agreement with Brother Timothy requires that he be notified of the request and allowed thirty days in which to respond. The Bancroft Library University of California/Berkeley Regional Oral History Office California Wine Industry Oral History Project Brother Timothy THE CHRISTIAN BROTHERS AS WINEMAKERS With an Introduction by Maynard A. Amerine An Interview Conducted by Ruth Teiser 1975 by The Regents of the University of California Brother Timothy Being interviewed at Mont La Salle, Photograph by Catherine Harroun. TABLE OF CONTENTS -- Brother Timothy PREFACE i INTRODUCTION by Maynard A. Amerine ill INTERVIEW HISTORY v THE CHRISTIAN BROTHERS 1 THE BEGINNING OF WINE MAKING AT MARTINEZ 4 THE MOVE TO
[Show full text]
Grape Varieties for Indiana
Commercial • HO-221-W Grape Varieties for Indiana COMMERCIAL HORTICULTURE • DEPARTMENT OF HORTICULTURE PURDUE UNIVERSITY COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE • WEST LAFAYETTE, IN Bruce Bordelon Selection of the proper variety is a major factor for fungal diseases than that of Concord (Table 1). Catawba successful grape production in Indiana. Properly match- also experiences foliar injury where ozone pollution ing the variety to the climate of the vineyard site is occurs. This grape is used primarily in white or pink necessary for consistent production of high quality dessert wines, but it is also used for juice production and grapes. Grape varieties fall into one of three groups: fresh market sales. This grape was widely grown in the American, French-American hybrids, and European. Cincinnati area during the mid-1800’s. Within each group are types suited for juice and wine or for fresh consumption. American and French-American Niagara is a floral, strongly labrusca flavored white grape hybrid varieties are suitable for production in Indiana. used for juice, wine, and fresh consumption. It ranks The European, or vinifera varieties, generally lack the below Concord in cold hardiness and ripens somewhat necessary cold hardiness to be successfully grown in earlier. On favorable sites, yields can equal or surpass Indiana except on the very best sites. those of Concord. Acidity is lower than for most other American varieties. The first section of this publication discusses American, French-American hybrids, and European varieties of wine Other American Varieties grapes. The second section discusses seeded and seedless table grape varieties. Included are tables on the best adapted varieties for Indiana and their relative Delaware is an early-ripening red variety with small berries, small clusters, and a mild American flavor.
[Show full text]
Official Journal of the European Communities No L 214/ 1
16 . 8 . 80 Official Journal of the European Communities No L 214/ 1 I (Acts whose publication is obligatory) COMMISSION REGULATION (EEC) No 2164/80 of 8 August 1980 amending for the seventh time Regulation ( EEC) No 1608/76 laying down detailed rules for the description and presentation of wines and grape musts THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN on an additional label placed in the same field of COMMUNITIES , vision as the other mandatory information ; Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, Whereas the nominal volume of containers with a volume of not less than 5 ml and not more than 10 1 suitable for putting up wines and grape musts which Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No are the subject of intra-Community trade is governed 337/79 of 5 February 1979 on the common organi by Council Directive 75/ 106/EEC of 19 December zation of the market in wine ('), as last amended by 1974 on the approximation of the laws of the Regulation (EEC) No 1988 / 80 (2 ), and in particular Member States relating to the making-up by volume Article 54 ( 5) thereof, of certain prepackaged liquids (8 ), as amended by Directive 79/ 1005 /EEC ( 9); whereas it is necessary, Whereas Council Regulation ( EEC) No 355 /79 of first, to adjust Regulation (EEC) No 1608 /76 in line 5 February 1979 laying down general rules for the with the amendments to that Directive and , secondly, description , and presentation of wines and grape in order to enable the wines and grape musts already musts (■'), as amended by Regulation (EEC) No
[Show full text]
RAPD Assessment of California Phylloxera Diversity. Molecular Ecology 4:459464.)
California grape phylloxera more variable than expected Jeffrey Granett 0 Andrew Walker P John De Benedictis GenineFong o Hong Lin P Ed Weber Many strains of grape phylloxera phylloxera’s biology, its life cycle and now have been identified in Cali- how grape species and rootstocks re- fornia vineyards. This variability sist its feeding. may be the result of multiple intro- This paper reviews our recent dis- ductions of this pest or of evolu- coveries that the DNA and feeding f tion of new strains on susceptible behavior of different collections of -G* or weakly resistant rootstocks. California phylloxera are relatively di- 8 1 verse. The discovery of diversity in 0 Thus own-rooted vines, weakly re- -J sistant rootstocks and those with biological populations is not novel, but the amount we found in California Grape phylloxera on rootstock. The minute V. vinifera parentage should not aphidlike insects feed on the root, causing a was unexpected. Because phylloxera be used in phylloxerated areas. In gall to form. The expanding and cracking gall were supposedly introduced into Cali- limits the root’s ability to take up water and addition, because of the observed fornia a relatively short time ago, and nutrients and allows rot organisms to invade. variability, quarantines are inef- they only reproduce asexually on the fective in preventing the occur- roots, we expected a relatively low are rarely damaged by its feeding. rence of biotype B phylloxera, as level of diversity. Other Vitis species, from parts of the it appears to evolve independently The variability in phylloxera’s abil- world where phylloxera are not na- in different areas.
[Show full text]
California Grape Acreage 1991
CALIFORNIA GRAPE ACREAGE 1991 California Agricultural Statistics Service P.O. Box 1258 Sacramento, CA 95812 (916) 654-0799 May 1992 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments ........................................................... 1 Foreword ................................................................. 1 Survey Methods ............................................................. 1 Data Limitations .......................................................... 2 Acreage Breakdown .......................................................... 3 Acreage Trends ............................................................. 3 Footnotes ................................................................ 31 TABLE 1. ALL GRAPES: Acreage standing by type, by year planted, California ................ 4 TABLE 2. RAISIN TYPE GRAPES: Acreage standing, by variety, by year planted, California ....... 4 TABLE 3. TABLE TYPE GRAPES: Acreage standing, by variety, by year planted, California ....... 4 TABLE 4. RED WINE TYPE GRAPES: Acreage standing, by variety, by year planted, California ......................................................... 5 TABLE 5. WHITE WINE TYPE GRAPES: Acreage standing, by variety, by year planted, California ......................................................... 5 TABLE 6. RAISIN TYPE GRAPES: Acreage standing, by variety, by year planted, by county, California ................................................. 6 TABLE 7. TABLE TYPE GRAPES: Acreage standing, by variety, by year planted, by county, California ................................................
[Show full text]
Phylloxera Strategiesis for Management in Oregon's Vineyards Information
EC 1463 • November 1995 $2.50 DATE. OF OUTPhylloxera StrategiesIS for management in Oregon's vineyards information: PUBLICATIONcurrent most THIS For http://extension.oregonstate.edu/catalog OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION SERVICE Contents Chapter 1. Phylloxera: What is it? 1 Chapter 2. Reducing the risk of phylloxera infestation 3 Chapter 3. Sampling vines to confirm the presence of phylloxera 4 Chapter 4. How to monitor the rate of spread of phylloxera in your vineyard 5 Chapter 5. Managing a phylloxera-infested vineyard DATE. 7 Chapter 6. Replanting options for establishing phylloxera-resistant vineyards 9 Chapter 7. Phylloxera-resistant rootstocks for grapevines 12 Chapter 8. Buying winegrape plants OF 19 Chapter 9. Tips for producing phylloxera-resistant grafted vines 20 OUT IS Authors This publication was prepared by a phylloxera task force at Oregon State University. Members are Bemadine Strik, Extensioninformation: berry crops specialist; M. Carmo Candolfi-Vasconcelos, Extension viticulture specialist; Glenn Fisher, Extension entomologist; Edward Hellman, Extension agent, North Willamette Research and Extension Center; Barney Watson, Extension enologist: Steven Price, postdoctoral research associate, viticulture; Anne Connelly, master's program student, horticulture; and Paula Stonerod, research aide, horticulture.PUBLICATION current most THIS For http://extension.oregonstate.edu/catalog Chapter 1 Phylloxera: What is It? B. Strik, A. Connelly, and G. Fisher History green, or light brown; on weakened distances. In Oregon, above-ground roots they are brown or orange. Mature nymphs have been detected on trunk The grape phylloxera, Daktulosphaira adults become brown or purplish- wraps in July and August. vitifoliae (Fitch), is an aphidlike insect brown, no matter on what kind of root that feeds on grape roots.
[Show full text]
The Influence of Phosphorus Availability, Scion, and Rootstock on Grapevine Shoot Growth, Leaf Area, and Petiole Phosphorus Concentration R
The Influence of Phosphorus Availability, Scion, and Rootstock on Grapevine Shoot Growth, Leaf Area, and Petiole Phosphorus Concentration R. STANLEY GRANT ~* and M. A. MATTHEWS 2 Cabernet Sauvignon (CS) and Chenin blanc (Cb) scions on Freedom, AxR#1, St. George, and 110R rootstocks were grown under conditions of sufficient (+P) and deficient (-P) soil phosphorous availability. Shoot length, shoot dry weight, leaf area, and petiole P concentration were lower for -P compared to +P vines. Cb vines had larger leaves and more leaf area than CS vines and the leaf area of Cb vines was less inhibited by exposure to -P than was CS vines. Vines on Freedom had longer shoots, greater shoot biomass, and greater leaf area than vines on other rootstocks regardless of P availability. Under +P vines on St. George produced less shoot dry weight than vines on Freedom, but more than vines on 110R. However, the shoot dry weight and leaf area of vines on St. George was greatly inhibited by -P and vines on St. George appeared to not use P efficiently for growth under these conditions. Vines on 110R produced the least amount of shoot growth and leaf area among the rootstocks under +P, but were also the least inhibited by -P conditions. The shoot dry weight and leaf area of vines on AxR#1 was intermediate between vines on Freedom and vines on St. George and 110R, and were inhibited by -P slightly less than St. George. Freedom and 110R are more suitable for low P soils than St. George and AxR#1.
[Show full text]
NELSON IVAN MENDOZA ALDERETE.Pdf (965.7Kb)
UNIVERSIDAD AUTONOMA AGRARIA ANTONIO NARRO UNIDAD LAGUNA DIVISIÓN DE CARRERAS AGRONÓMICAS EFECTO DE PORTAINJERTO Y DENSIDAD DE PLANTACIÓN SOBRE LA PRODUCCIÓN DE UVA Y VIGOR DE LA PLANTA EN LA VARIEDAD RUBIRED, BAJO CONDICIONES DE SEQUIA. POR NELSON IVAN MENDOZA ALDERETE TESIS PRESENTADA COMO REQUISITO PARCIAL PARA OBTENER EL TÍTULO DE: INGENIERO AGRÓNOMO EN HORTICULTURA TORREÓN, COAHUILA, MÉXICO Febrero de 2009 Dedicatorias A dios: Por darme la vida para alcanzar esta meta, por la oportunidad que me dio para concluir satisfactoriamente una etapa más de mi vida y por tantas cosas buenas y maravillosas que me ha brindado. A mis padres: Lázaro Mendoza Almaraz Y María Trinidad Alderete Marrufo A mi padre por haberme otorgado siempre su apoyo incondicional, para terminar mi carrera universitaria, así como sus consejos que me ayudaron a forjarme un carácter fuerte de convicciones concretas, y por creer en mí. A mi madre por toda su dulzura, su cariño y comprensión, y por toda la confianza que deposito en mí…. Y a ambos por haberme dado esta herencia tan grande que nunca hubiera logrado sin su apoyo incondicional. A mi novia Jeny que me apoyo en todo momento y estuvo conmigo cuando necesite de ella. A mis hermanos: Juan Carlos Mendoza Alderete y Osbaldo Mendoza Alderete, por todo su apoyo, respeto y cariño que me han brindado. GRACIAS. A mis abuelos, tíos, primos y a toda mi familia que de una u otra manera influyeron en mi carrera y contribuyeron para que lograra alcanzar mi meta … a todos ellos ….GRACIAS… i AGRADECIMIENTOS A dios por darme la oportunidad de vivir este momento tan satisfactorio de mi vida y por ayudarme a ser una persona de bien y mostrarme el camino correcto para alcanzar mis metas.
[Show full text]
Population Diversity of Grape Phylloxera in California and Evidence for Sexual Reproduction
Population Diversity of Grape Phylloxera in California and Evidence for Sexual Reproduction Summaira Riaz,1,2 Karl T. Lund,1,2 Jeffrey Granett,1 and M. Andrew Walker1* Abstract: Until recently, the foliar forms of grape phylloxera have been absent or very rare in California, and no- dosities have not been common on resistant rootstocks. Foliar phylloxera are now widely spread in the mothervine plantings of grape rootstock nurseries in Yolo and Solano counties. Nodosities on resistant rootstocks have also been frequently observed. To determine the genetic relationships within and among these seemingly new types of phyl- loxera, collections were made across California from 2009 to 2011. Foliar-feeding phylloxera strains were collected from rootstock mothervines at the National Clonal Germplasm Repository in Winters, CA; University of California, Davis (UCD), vineyards; and six commercial rootstock nursery plantings in Yolo and Solano counties. Root-feeding samples were collected from a rootstock trial at the UCD Oakville research station vineyard in Napa County, which had previously been sampled in 2006 and 2007. Root-feeding samples were also collected from commercial vineyards in Napa and Sonoma counties and UCD vineyards. All samples were tested and genotyped using simple sequence repeat markers, and the genetic structure of the populations was analyzed. The results identified four genetically distinct populations of phylloxera in California, which were named Davis, Foliar, Napa1, and Napa2. Davis, Napa1, and Napa2 were composed of root-feeding samples. Multilocus genotypes with identical DNA-fingerprint profiles were detected in the 2006 to 2007 samples from the Oakville research station. More genetic divergence was observed in the Davis, Napa1, and Napa2 populations, with evidence for sexual reproduction between members of Napa1 and Napa2.
[Show full text]
Best Practice Management Guide: Eutypa Dieback Spores
Wine Australia for Australian Wine Best practice management guide Version 1.1 • Feb 2018 Eutypa dieback Introduction 5 key facts Eutypa dieback, caused by the fungus Eutypa lata, is a major trunk disease of grapevines. The productivity • Caused by a fungus that is spread by airborne spores of infected grapevines gradually declines and vines • Spores are released from infected dead wood eventually die. Eutypa dieback costs the Australian during rainfall wine industry millions of dollars in lost production and • Spores infect exposed pruning wounds and the additional vineyard costs per annum. Vineyard owners fungus progressively kills spurs, cordons and trunks can manage the disease by physically removing • Wounds are most susceptible to infection in the first infected wood and encouraging shoots from lower, 2 weeks after pruning uninfected parts of the vine. Wound treatments should • Disease control can be achieved with preventative be applied post-pruning to reduce likelihood of new wound treatments and curative remedial surgery infections. Spores Rain Wind Spores Fresh pruning wound Old, diseased vine Young, healthy vine Symptomatic vine Figure 1. Eutypa dieback disease cycle. 2 Wine Australia Best practice management guide: Eutypa dieback Spores Spores Large wounds Cane-pruned vine closer to trunk. Spores Small wounds further from trunk. Spores Spur-pruned vine Figure 2. Spur- and cane-pruned vines, showing wound size and proximity to trunk, which impact the progression of eutypa dieback. Disease cycle The E. lata fungus grows, on average, at 2 cm/year Eutypa dieback is spread when fungal spores land on an through the vascular tissue of the cordons towards the open wound (e.g.
[Show full text]
Grape Varieties for Wine Production 1
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA CIRCULAR 356 August, 1943 GRAPE VARIETIES FOR WINE PRODUCTION 1 M. A. AMERINE 2 and A. J. WINKLER 3 Although California Wineries have utilized a considerable tonnage of raisin and table grapes since repeal of Prohibition, their preferred material is wine grapes. In this state there are now only 170,000 acres of such grapes, pro- ducing about 600,000 tons per year. The average annual winery crush (1937 to 1941) has exceeded 900,000 tons, but the annual crush of wine grapes has not exceeded 450,000 ; hence wine grapes have constituted approximately only 50 4 per cent of the total crush. Should normal winery demands continue, the acreage of wine grapes could probably be expanded with profit. The grower is interested in planting varieties that produce well, but the consumer is con- cerned with securing a product of good quality. Interest in wine-grape adaptation to the climatic regions of California has extended from the time of Agoston Haraszthy in 1860 to the present. From 1880 until Prohibition, the California Agricultural Experiment Station con- ducted detailed studies, first under Dean E. W. Hilgard, later under Professor F. T. Bioletti. Since Prohibition repeal the studies have been continued, and the present circular summarizes the best information available. Table wines may be either sweet or dry. They contain less than 14.0 per cent of alcohol, and the dry types should have over 0.6 per cent acid. The sweet types contain 0.5 to 5.0 per cent sugar and appear balanced with only about 0.5 per cent acid.
[Show full text]