DOCSLIB.ORG

Diyarbekir and the Armenian Crisis of 1895—The Fate of the Countryside1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Diyarbekir and the Armenian Crisis of 1895—The Fate of the Countryside1 ANNEX B DIYARBEKIR AND THE ARMENIAN CRISIS OF 1895—THE FATE OF THE COUNTRYSIDE1 Jelle Verheij Like other major conflicts in the autumn of 1895, the crisis in Diyarbekir had a profound influence on the situation elsewhere in the eastern prov- inces, triggering new shockwaves of anxiety.2 The effect in Diyarbekir province itself was immediate. Directly after the massacre in the city, the countryside around the urban centre, until then relatively calm, was also gripped by violence. This Section attempts to give a summary of events in the other towns and rural areas of Diyarbekir Vilayet. This is pioneering work and should not be assumed to be definitive. Certainly more sources need to be unearthed and much more research is required. It is likely that various local factors were at work, at district and even village level, each of which need to be analyzed thoroughly in order to ascertain the full picture of events in the province as a whole. That will not be done here. A closer look is taken at one case, however, the events in Diyarbekir’s most northerly district of Palu. Information on the situation in the countryside is available in both Ottoman and foreign sources, but identifying places is particularly com- plicated because of the lack of detailed maps and the Turkification of place names around 1960, when all non-Turkish traditional names were abolished.3 1 For the sources of this Annex see the references of my article “Diyarbekir and the Armenian Crisis of 1895” in this volume. 2 In the town of Muş (in the neighboring province of Bitlis), for example, news of the violence in Diyarbekir caused immediate tension (PP96-2, Nr. 246 p. 124). 3 See Annex A for an attempt to list all non-Muslim settlements in the Diyarbekir Vilayet, with their old and new names. 334 annex b The Central Sub-Province (Merkez Sancak) of Diyarbekir The Central District (Merkez Kaza) of Diyarbekir Most of the forty plus Christian villages in the central district of Diyar- bekir were situated to the east of the Tigris river. The majority of these were Syriac or mixed Armenian–Syriac.4 During the massacre in Diyar- bekir city, groups of Kurds started to attack these villages. Apparently, the first attack was on the Protestant village of Kıtırbıl, by an ağa of the Tirkan tribe, north of Diyarbekir.5 The beleaguered inhabitants held out for two days. Very few of the local men seem to have survived. The village was pillaged and burned.6 Other villages in the same area, notably Kabi (currently Bağıvar)7 and Karabaş,8 saw the same fate. In Satıköy, many people were said to have perished when the church in which they had taken refuge was set on fire.9 Few villages seem to have escaped attack, although information on villages at a greater distance from the capital is scarce.10 Initial estimates of the number of victims in the area ran as high as 3,000.11 Some months later, the British Consul in Diyarbekir estimated that between 800 and 900 Christians had lost their lives.12 Lice The town of Lice had a sizeable Armenian population. About one-quarter of the villages in the district was Armenian.13 The reports of the foreign 4 Of the 297 villages in the central district as listed in the Osmanlı atlası (OA, p. 83), 21 were Syrian, 14 mixed Syrian-Armenian, and 6 Armenian. See Annex A. 5 FO 195/1930 Nrs. 24, 62; BOA A.MKT.MHM 637-32. Another source claims that nomadic (göçer) Kurds from Sasun were involved in the attack (ABC reel 695, 25.11.1895). 6 FO 195/1930 Nrs. 49, 62. More than 70 women and children were kidnapped. 7 This village was ‘thoroughly pillaged and destroyed’ on 3 November 1895 (ABC, reel 695, 25.11.1895). When American missionaries Rendel and Helen Harris passed through Kabi in July 1896, they found the village in ruins and hardly populated (Harris & Harris 1897: 125). 8 This mixed Armenian-Syriac village was attacked by Kurds on 2–3 November 1895. There were possibly 20 victims and approximately 100 houses burned (ABC, Letter from Missionary Andrus, Mardin, 25.11.1895). 9 Gaunt 2006: 250. Gaunt reports that this ‘pogrom’ took place on 1 October 1895, which seems quite unlikely. Should probably be November 1. 10 MY Nrs. 63, 66, 94. According to Hallward, of the 770 Christian houses in these vil- lages, 500 were burned down (FO 195/1930 Nr. 18). 11 MY Nr. 63. 12 FO 195/1930 Nr. 18. 13 There were 133 villages in Lice (OA p. 83); 30 or more had a (partly) Christian popula- tion (see Annex A)..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download Pdf Here
    THE POPULAR PRESS HOLDINGS IN THE MIDDLE EAST DEPARTMENT JOSEPH REGENSTEIN LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO Introduction: Survey of the Popular Press in the Islamic World 1 I. Arabic 25 II. Armenian, Azeri, Georgian, Kurdish and Russian 44 III. English, French and Hebrew 46 IV. Persian 54 V. Ottoman / Turkish 107 Appendices: 163 Persian Newspapers published in India, Middle Eastern Newspapers at CRL, Middle Eastern Newspapers Currently Received by the Library Official Gazettes in the Middle East Department Select bibliographies are included at the end of each section. Though compilation of this list was stopped in the mid­1990s, we believe it remains useful to library patrons as it contains information about materials that are not in the library catalog and thus can be found no other way. In the years since, new materials have been acquired, some uncataloged materials have been cataloged, and some items have been moved. It is important to communicate with the Middle East Department to determine how to access materials—especially those listed as uncataloged. For further information, please consult a staff member in the Middle East Department office, JRL 560 (open Monday through Friday, 9AM to 5PM), or contact Marlis Saleh (details at http://guides.lib.uchicago.edu/mideast). Middle Eastern Popular Press 1 1. INTRODUCTION: SURVEY OF THE POPULAR PRESS IN THE ISLAMIC WORLD. Background: The introduction of a popular newspaper and serial press to the Islamic world came with the introduction of the western newspaper form itself, in part a product of 18th century European, particularly French, influence on the Ottoman government in Istanbul, and Napoleon's invasion of Egypt in 1798­1801.
    [Show full text]
  • Talaat Pasha's Report on the Armenian Genocide.Fm
    Gomidas Institute Studies Series TALAAT PASHA’S REPORT ON THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE by Ara Sarafian Gomidas Institute London This work originally appeared as Talaat Pasha’s Report on the Armenian Genocide, 1917. It has been revised with some changes, including a new title. Published by Taderon Press by arrangement with the Gomidas Institute. © 2011 Ara Sarafian. All Rights Reserved. ISBN 978-1-903656-66-2 Gomidas Institute 42 Blythe Rd. London W14 0HA United Kingdom Email: [email protected] CONTENTS Introduction by Ara Sarafian 5 Map 18 TALAAT PASHA’S 1917 REPORT Opening Summary Page: Data and Calculations 20 WESTERN PROVINCES (MAP) 22 Constantinople 23 Edirne vilayet 24 Chatalja mutasarriflik 25 Izmit mutasarriflik 26 Hudavendigar (Bursa) vilayet 27 Karesi mutasarriflik 28 Kala-i Sultaniye (Chanakkale) mutasarriflik 29 Eskishehir vilayet 30 Aydin vilayet 31 Kutahya mutasarriflik 32 Afyon Karahisar mutasarriflik 33 Konia vilayet 34 Menteshe mutasarriflik 35 Teke (Antalya) mutasarriflik 36 CENTRAL PROVINCES (MAP) 37 Ankara (Angora) vilayet 38 Bolu mutasarriflik 39 Kastamonu vilayet 40 Janik (Samsun) mutasarriflik 41 Nigde mutasarriflik 42 Kayseri mutasarriflik 43 Adana vilayet 44 Ichil mutasarriflik 45 EASTERN PROVINCES (MAP) 46 Sivas vilayet 47 Erzerum vilayet 48 Bitlis vilayet 49 4 Talaat Pasha’s Report on the Armenian Genocide Van vilayet 50 Trebizond vilayet 51 Mamuretulaziz (Elazig) vilayet 52 SOUTH EASTERN PROVINCES AND RESETTLEMENT ZONE (MAP) 53 Marash mutasarriflik 54 Aleppo (Halep) vilayet 55 Urfa mutasarriflik 56 Diyarbekir vilayet
    [Show full text]
  • Mardin Sancağinda Mülki Ve Askeri Memurlarin Görev
    Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi / The Journal of International Social Research Cilt: 13 Sayı: 71 Haziran 2020 & Volume: 13 Issue: 71 June 2020 www.sosyalarastirmalar.com Issn: 1307 - 9581 MARDİN SANCAĞINDA MÜLKİ VE ASKERİ MEMURLARIN GÖREV SUİSTİMALLERİ ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME (1900 - 1920) AN EVALUATION ON THE WRONGDOINGS OF CIVIL AND MILITARY OFFICERS IN MARDIN SANJAK (1900 - 1920) Bilal ALTAN Ö z et Mardin idari statüsü olarak 19. yüzyılın ikinci yarısından Cumhuriyete kadar uzanan süreçte Diyarbekir Vilayetine bağlı bir sancaktır. Osmanlı İmparatorluğu’nda Tanzimat Devrinde merkeziyetçiliği modern anlamda artıracak düzenlemeler mülki ve askeri alana da yansımıştır. İdari teşkilattaki değişim yeni memurlukların ortaya çıkmasında etki li olmuştur. Çıkartılan kanunlarla memurların görev ve sorumlulukları ayrı ayrı belirlenmiştir. Tüm İ mparatorlukta tayin edilen memurlardan görevini hakkıyla ifa edenler olduğu gibi görev suiistimaline giden memurlar da oldukça fazlaydı. Bu çalışmada 20. y üzyılın başlarında Mardin sancak merkezi ile sancağa bağlı Cizre, Midyat, Nusaybin ve Savur kazalarında görev ifa eden mülki ve askeri memurların kanunlara aykırı mahiyette yolsuzluk, usulsüzlük, rüşvet gibi memuriyetle bağdaşmayacak davranışlar sergilemel erine dair muhtelif görev suistimalleri değerlendirmek amaçlanmıştır. Anahtar Kelimeler: Mardin Sancağı, Mülki, Askeri, Memur, Tahkikat . Abstract Mardin had the administrative status of a sanjak affiliated to Diyarbekir Province from the second half of the 19th century until the establishment of the republic. The arrangements that increased centralization in the modern sense in the Tanzimat Era in the Ottoman Empire were also reflected in the civil and military fields. The change in the administrative organization was also effective in the emergence of new civil services. The duties and responsibilities of civil servants are determined separately with the laws introduced.
    [Show full text]
  • Migration, Memory and Mythification: Relocation of Suleymani Tribes on the Northern Ottoman–Iranian Frontier
    Middle Eastern Studies ISSN: 0026-3206 (Print) 1743-7881 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/fmes20 Migration, memory and mythification: relocation of Suleymani tribes on the northern Ottoman–Iranian frontier Erdal Çiftçi To cite this article: Erdal Çiftçi (2018) Migration, memory and mythification: relocation of Suleymani tribes on the northern Ottoman–Iranian frontier, Middle Eastern Studies, 54:2, 270-288, DOI: 10.1080/00263206.2017.1393623 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/00263206.2017.1393623 Published online: 06 Nov 2017. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 361 View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=fmes20 MIDDLE EASTERN STUDIES, 2018 VOL. 54, NO. 2, 270–288 https://doi.org/10.1080/00263206.2017.1393623 Migration, memory and mythification: relocation of Suleymani tribes on the northern Ottoman–Iranian frontier Erdal Cift¸ ci¸ a,b aHistory Department, Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey; bHistory Department, Mardin Artuklu University, Mardin, Turkey Although some researchers have studied the relationship between hereditary Kurdish emirs and the Ottoman central government, there has been little discussion of the role played by Kurdish tribes, and Kurdish tribes in general have been omitted from scholars’ narratives. Researchers have mostly discussed how Idris-i Bidlisi became an intermediary between the Ottoman central government and the disinherited Kurdish emirs, some of whom had been removed from power by the Safavids. In this article, we will not focus on the condominium between the Ottoman central government and the Kurdish emirs, but rather, we will draw attention to the roles played by the Kurdish tribes – specifically, the role played by the Suleymani tribes during the period dominated by local political upheaval in the sixteenth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue: May #2
    CATALOGUE: MAY #2 MOSTLY OTTOMAN EMPIRE, THE BALKANS, ARMENIA AND THE MIDDLE EAST - Books, Maps & Atlases 19th & 20th Centuries www.pahor.de 1. COSTUMES OF THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE A small, well made drawing represents six costumes of the Ottoman Empire and the Middle East. The numeration in the lower part indicates, that the drawing was perhaps made to accompany a Anon. [Probably European artist]. text. S.l., s.d. [Probably mid 19th century] Pencil and watercolour on paper (9,5 x 16,5 cm / 3.7 x 6.5 inches), with edges mounted on 220 EUR later thick paper (28 x 37,5 cm / 11 x 14,8 inches) with a hand-drawn margins (very good, minor foxing and staining). 2. GREECE Anon. [Probably a British traveller]. A well made drawing represents a Greek house, indicated with a title as a house between the port city Piraeus and nearby Athens, with men in local costumes and a man and two young girls in House Between Piraeus and Athens. central or west European clothing. S.l., s.d. [Probably mid 19th century]. The drawing was perhaps made by one of the British travellers, who more frequently visited Black ink on thick paper, image: 17 x 28 cm (6.7 x 11 inches), sheet: 27 x 38,5 cm (10.6 x 15.2 Greece in the period after Britain helped the country with its independence. inches), (minor staining in margins, otherwise in a good condition). 160 EUR 3. OTTOMAN GEOLOGICAL MAP OF TURKEY: Historical Context: The Rise of Turkey out of the Ottoman Ashes Damat KENAN & Ahmet Malik SAYAR (1892 - 1965).
    [Show full text]
  • 600 19.Yüzyilin Ikinci Yarisinda Siirt Sancağinin Mali Yapisi
    ISPEC ULUSLARARASI SOSYAL ve BEŞERİBİLİMLER KONGRESİ 10-12 Haziran 2019 19.YÜZYILIN İKİNCİ YARISINDA SİİRT SANCAĞININ MALİ YAPISI ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Mehmet DAĞ Siirt Üniversitesi Bilim Uzmanı Abdurrezzak ÇELİK Siirt Üniversitesi ÖZET Tarihin kadim şehirlerinden biri olan Siirt, 1514 Çaldıran Seferiyle birlikte Osmanlı hâkimiyetine girmiştir. 1526 yılından itibaren Diyarbakır Eyaletine bağlı olarak idare edilen Siirt, kısa bir dönem Van Eyaletine bağlanmışsa da 1881 yılına kadar farklı idari statüler altında Diyarbakır’a bağlılığını sürdürmüştür. 1877-1878 Osmanlı-Rus Harbi sonrası Doğu Anadolu bölgesinde yapılan idari düzenlemelere bağlı olarak 1881 yılında yeni kurulan Bitlis vilayetine bağlanan Siirt, 1920 yılına değin bu şekilde yönetilmiştir. 1920 yılından sonra ilk etapta bağımsız sancak olarak daha sonra ise il olarak idare edilmiştir. Tanzimat Dönemi içerisinde özellikle XIX. yüzyılın ikinci yarısından itibaren merkezî otoritenin güçlendirilmesine yönelik olarak ülkenin idari teşkilatında yapılan düzenlemeler, Siirt’te de sosyal, ekonomik ve mali etkileriyle belirgin bir şekilde hissedilmiştir. Bu çalışmada 19. yüzyılın ikinci yarısında Siirt sancağında meydana gelen mali gelişmeler ve vergi ile ilgili olaylar hakkında bilgiler verilerek değerlendirmelerde bulunulacaktır. Anahtar Kelimeler: Vergi, Mali Yapı, Siirt, Osmanlı Devleti ABSTRACT Siirt, one of the ancient cities of history, entered the Ottoman rule with the 1514 Çaldıran Campaign. Siirt, which was administered as a part of Diyarbakir Province since 1526, was attached to Van Province for a short period but continued its loyalty to Diyarbakir under different administrative status until 1881. After the Ottoman-Russian War of 1877-1878, depending on the administrative arrangements made in the region of Eastern Anatolia, Siirt, which was connected to the newly established Bitlis province in 1881, was managed in this way until 1920.
    [Show full text]
  • KAZAZYANLAR Dr. Hüseyin KURT* Öz Diyarbekir'li Katolik Bir Ermeni
    Cilt/Volume:2 Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi Sayı/Issue:1 International Journal of Social Sciences Haziran/June 2020 Yıl:2 İHANETVE SADAKAT İLE SINANMIŞ BİR AİLE: KAZAZYANLAR Dr. Hüseyin KURT* Öz Diyarbekir’li Katolik bir Ermeni olan Osib Kazazyan, 23 Aralık 1878 tarihinde Meşrutiyet’in ilan edilmesi ile birlikte Diyarbekir vilayetinden Mebusan MeClisi’ne vekil olarak seçilmiştir. Diyarbekir vilayetinin en varlıklı ve saygın ailelerinden olan Kazazyanlar, vilayet bürokrasisinde önemli mevkiler elde etmişlerdir. Zaman içinde değişen siyasi dengelere bağlı olarak Osmanlı merkezi yönetiminin ve buna bağlı olarak taşradaki güçlerin gayrimüslimlere yönelik politikasındaki değişimi, Kazazyan ailesi örneğinde görmek mümkündür. Çok dinli ve farklı etnik yapıların bir arada olduğu imparatorluğun bu uzak Coğrafyasında kendisini merkezde konumlandıran din eksenli toplumsal kutuplaşma, bazı birey ve grupların dışlanmasını da beraberinde getirmiştir. Buna paralel olarak Osib Efendi ve ailesi birçok kez sürgün edilerek yargılanmış ve bir hukuk mücadelesi vermişlerdir. Bu mücadelenin sonunda Kazazyanlar, aile fertlerini faili meçhul Cinayetlere kurban vermiştir. Bu çalışmada Kazazyan ailesinin başından geçen olaylar Osmanlı arşiv belgeleri ışığında değerlendirilmeye çalışılmıştır. Anahtar Kelimeler: Diyarbekir Vilayeti, Ermeniler, Kazazyanlar, Osib Efendi, Osmanlı Devleti A FAMILIY TESTED WITH BETRAYED AND LOYALITY: KAZAZYANS Abstract Osib Kazazyan, a CatholiC Armenian from Diyarbekir, was eleCted to the Member of Parliament Assembly from the Diyarbekir province upon the deClaration of the Constitutional Monarchy on 23 DeCember 1878. Kazazians, one of the wealthiest and most respeCted families of the Diyarbekir province, gained important positions in the provincial bureaucraCy. Depending on the politiCal balances Changing over time, it is possible to see the Change in the poliCy of the Ottoman Central government and the powers in the provinces towards non- Muslims in the Case of the Kazazyan family.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkish Area Studies Review
    Turkish Area Studies Review Bulletin of the British Association for Turkish Area Studies www.batas.org.uk No 25 Spring 2015 ISSN 1474-0125 BATAS Spring Symposium 2015 and Annual General Meeting St Antony’s College, Oxford Saturday 25 April 2015 10.00 am to 4.30 pm Details enclosed (p 74-76). Please act now! For more information see: www.batas.org.uk TAS Review Spring 2015 CONTENTS B Beeley & S-B Martin 2 Editorial The 2015 John Martin Lecture Eugene Rogan 3 Gallipoli from both Sides of the Trenches Politics, Society & Economics Gamon McLellan 7 Turkey’s Politics since October 2014 Clement Dodd 15 Update on Cyprus 2014/15 Mina Toksöz 21 The Turkish Economy in 2015 History & Archaeology Peter Rogers 24 The Search for Cissides Naoíse MacSweeney 27 Ancient Greek settlement in W Anatolia Gerald MacLean 31 British Travellers to Ottoman Kurdistan Part II Serkan Yazιcι & Yakoob Ahmed 38 Sultan Abdul Hamid II Art & Culture Gülay Yurdal-Michaels, poet 44 Pronectus-Karamürsel’de Yatan Kardeşim için and translator 44 For My Brother – whose grave is in Pronectus Abed Najjar 44 The Philately of Post-Ottoman ‘Arabia’ Mary Işın 49 The Story of Turkey’s Sweets and Desserts Chris Ponsford 52 Turkey from the Shore: Reflections Philippa Scott 55 An Ottoman Garden in St Louis Heidemarie Blankenstein 57 When Walls fall – is it always a Blessing? Ayşe Furlonger 59 Noteworthy Events BIAA Project Warren Dockter & Stephen Mitchell 64 Turkey & Britain 1914 – 1952, a BIAA report Book Reviews & Publications Brian Beeley 66 Fatma Sel Turhan, The Ottoman Empire & the Bosnian Uprising Jill Sindall 67 Naci Yorulmaz, Arming the Sultan Arın Bayraktaroğlu 69 Recent & Forthcoming Publications In Memoriam Celia Kerslake 72 A memorial event for Andrew Mango Celia Kerslake 73 Talât Sait Halman Please note: Opinions expressed and stances taken are exclusively those of the contributors themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • 83 Ali Murat Kurşun Aberystwyth University Deconstructing The
    All Azimuth V9, N1, 2020, 83-104 Deconstructing the Sykes-Picot Myth: Frontiers, Boundaries, Borders and the Evolution of Ottoman Territoriality Ali Murat Kurşun Aberystwyth University Abstract This study aims to evaluate the emergence of the Sykes-Picot order and deconstruct its mythologization by proposing an evolutionary assessment of border understanding. This study addresses the following primary research questions: How did the interplay of domestic, regional, and international developments lay the groundwork for the formation of the Sykes-Picot territorial order? How was the administrative structure and regional divisions before the Sykes-Picot agreement and to which border categorizations did these structures correspond? Was the Sykes-Picot agreement the only international intervention that affected the borders of the region or were there other international interventions before the Sykes-Picot agreement? This study argues that the history of Middle Eastern border formation is not only an international one but also involves many aspects that have not widely been taken into consideration. In doing so, this paper adopts a critical historical perspective to analyze the evolution of Middle Eastern borders. This paper proposes a three-tracked evolutionary analytical framework (frontiers, boundaries, borders) to analyze the emergence of borders and applies it to the emergence of Ottoman territoriality. This study concludes that the Sykes-Picot agreement is only one, complementary part of a long process in the emergence of Middle Eastern geopolitics. Keywords: Ottoman territoriality, Sykes-Picot Agreement, Middle Eastern borders, border studies 1. Introduction In November 1915, Mark Sykes, advisor to British Secretary of State for War Lord Kitchener, and French former consul in Beirut François Georges Picot were tasked by their respective governments to craft an acceptable post-war partition map for the Middle East.
    [Show full text]
  • Fallow Fields, Famine and the Making of Lebanon
    FALLOW FIELDS FAMINE AND THE MAKING OF LEBANON A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History By Graham A. Pitts, M.A. Washington, DC June 3, 2016 Copyright 2016 by Graham A. Pitts All Rights Reserved ii FALLOW FIELDS: FAMINE AND THE MAKING OF LEBANON Graham A. Pitts, M.A. Thesis Advisor: John R. McNeill, Ph.D. ABSTRACT This dissertation narrates Lebanon’s environmental history through the lens of the country’s World War I famine. My analysis uses the catastrophe as a prism through which to reconstruct Lebanese agrarian life. Between 1887 and 1914, as many as 150,000 Lebanese migrated to the Americas. On the war’s eve, remittances from abroad formed the largest source of income for the Lebanese, followed by the export of silk. Wartime conditions made both sources of income all but impossible to obtain and the ensuing famine exposed the vulnerabilities of Lebanon’s reliance on global flows of humans and capital. One in three Lebanese perished during the war. Years of demographic instability became a crisis of excess mortality once the war denied the population access to its livelihood and the safety valve of migration. By taking the human relationship with the rest of nature as its unit of analysis, my study posits broad continuities between the late Ottoman period and the French Mandate era whereas most studies have seen World War I, and the subsequent imposition of French colonialism, as a decisive rupture.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Diyarbakir Armenian Churches in Lower Mesopotamia Region
    Online Journal of Art and Design volume 7, issue 1, January 2019 Evaluation of Diyarbakir Armenian Churches in Lower Mesopotamia Region Emine Dağtekin Ass.Professor, Dicle University, Faculty of Architecture, Department of Architecture, Diyarbakır/Turkey [email protected] (Corresponding Author) Semra Hillez Halifeoğlu Dicle University, Faculty of Architecture, Department of Architecture, Diyarbakır/Turkey [email protected] ABSTRACT Diyarbakir is located in Asia, in Lower Mesopotamia, and in the Southeast Anatolia Region of Turkey. The Southeastern Anatolia Region is a region where prominent centers of early Christianity are located. The Ottomans managed the administration of the regions where the Armenian lived since the 14th and 15th centuries. However, the Armenians, who accepted the Christianity first, were allowed to act as a separate community despite some restrictions. The Armenians, as a widespread and settled community in Anatolia, lived in Diyarbakir by taking influential roles in urban population until the 20th century. This study aims to carry into future the 4 churches belonging to Armenians living in Diyarbakır until the beginning of the 20th century by evaluating the churches in terms of history, plan and facade layouts, decoration items, usage and structural conditions and the study proposes to protect these assets. The consciousness created by the preservation of historical buildings and the survival of cultures in the city at the 2000s has created a positive social force for the restoration of the churches. With the restoration, the Armenians, who lived for centuries but migrated from the city, were able to carry their culture to the new generations and they visited the city as well as the buildings.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ottoman Empire
    TEACHING MODERN SOUTHEAST EUROPEAN HISTORY Alternative Educational Materials The Ottoman Empire THE PUBLICATIONS AND TEACHER TRAINING ACTIVITIES OF THE JOINT HISTORY PROJECT HAVE BEEN MADE POSSIBLE THROUGH THE KIND FINANCIAL BACKING OF THE FOLLOWING: UK FOREIGN & COMMONWEALTH OFFICE Norwegian People’s Aid United States Institute of Peace Swiss Development Agency DR. PETER MAHRINGER FONDS TWO ANONYMOUS DONORS THE CYPRUS FEDERATION OF AMERICA Royal Dutch Embassy in Athens WINSTON FOUNDATION FOR WORLD PEACE And with particular thanks for the continued support of: 2nd Edition in the English Language CDRSEE Rapporteur to the Board for the Joint History Project: Costa Carras Executive Director: Nenad Sebek Director of Programmes: Corinna Noack-Aetopulos CDRSEE Project Team: George Georgoudis, Biljana Meshkovska, Antonis Hadjiyannakis, Jennifer Antoniadis and Louise Kallora-Stimpson English Language Proofreader: Jenny Demetriou Graphic Designer: Anagramma Graphic Designs, Kallidromiou str., 10683, Athens, Greece Printing House: Petros Ballidis and Co., Ermou 4, Metamorfosi 14452, Athens, Greece Disclaimer: The designations employed and presentation of the material in the book do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the publisher (CDRSEE) nor on the sponsors. This book contains the views expressed by the authors in their individual capacity and may not necessarily reflect the views of the CDRSEE and the sponsoring agencies. Print run: 1000 Copyright: Center for Democracy and Reconciliation in Southeast Europe (CDRSEE)
    [Show full text]