DOCSLIB.ORG

The Plots Against Hitler'

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Plots Against Hitler' H-War Montesclaros on Orbach, 'The Plots against Hitler' Review published on Thursday, April 11, 2019 Danny Orbach. The Plots against Hitler. Boston: Eamon Dolan/Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2016. xvi + 406 pp. $28.00 (cloth), ISBN 978-0-544-71443-4. Reviewed by Mark Montesclaros (U.S. Army Command and General Staff College, Fort Gordon Satellite Campus) Published on H-War (April, 2019) Commissioned by Margaret Sankey (Air War College) Printable Version: http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showpdf.php?id=52554 "We Have Done the Right Thing” Academic interest in resistance movements that defied Hitler’s Third Reich seems to continue unabated. In popular culture, cinematic treatments such as Valkyrie (2008) and 13 Minutes (2015) introduced broader audiences to those that tried to eliminate Hitler, and in particular to the respective assassins portrayed in each film, Claus von Stauffenberg and Georg Elser. Both attempts figure prominently in Danny Orbach’s The Plots against Hitler, an effective new study on resisters, primarily in the German military organizations, that tried to defy, depose, or assassinate the infamous leader of the Third Reich. Orbach’s book encompasses the period 1938-44 and is a fascinating analysis that makes a solid contribution to the current literature on resistance movements within Nazi Germany. Using a variety of primary sources, including many in foreign languages, Orbach uses an effective structural approach to underpin his analysis. This aids the reader in placing the resistance movements, particularly those within the German army, in proper context. Additionally, the author examines the strengths and weaknesses of each of the army configurations, which helps to explain why some were more successful than others. Of course, in the end, none achieved the ultimate goal of eliminating the leader of the Third Reich; each failed attempt merely reinforced Hitler’s belief that divine providence protected him in his quest to fulfill his vision for Germany. Thus, Orbach’s summary is necessarily a melancholy one: “So ended the story of the German resistance movement; honorably, perhaps, but in utter failure” (p. 266). The Plots against Hitler is organized logically, chronologically as well as thematically. The book begins not with a direct attempt to depose Hitler but with the well-known burning of the Reichstag—the German parliament building—by the ill-fated Dutch Communist Marinus van der Lubbe in February 1933. Orbach explains that Hitler used this attempt as an excuse to eliminate all possible competition to the Nazis—especially the Communists and Social Democrats. It thus fell to the Wehrmacht—the German armed forces—and especially the army, to form the basis for resistance to the Third Reich. While seemingly an unlikely source for opposition to Hitler, the army eventually developed into the organization most capable of opposing him based on its organization, leadership, and access to arms, intelligence, and the Fuhrer himself. Most of the author’s work focuses on the evolution of the resistance within the army, beginning with Citation: H-Net Reviews. Montesclaros on Orbach, 'The Plots against Hitler'. H-War. 04-11-2019. https://networks.h-net.org/node/12840/reviews/4001101/montesclaros-orbach-plots-against-hitler Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 1 H-War the formation of the initial group of conspirators in 1938 and culminating in the famous Stauffenberg assassination and coup attempt (“Valkyrie II”) in July 1944. Using network analysis, Orbach categorizes the phases of the army resistance, using terms such as “cliques,” “connected cliques,” and “wheel conspiracy,” arguing that over time the movement grew in sophistication and effectiveness. While each phase had its advantages and disadvantages, Orbach argues that Claus von Stauffenberg’s personal charisma and leadership as the “hub” of the wheel conspiracy represented the movement’s most mature stage in 1944 and came closest to achieving its ultimate goal of eliminating Hitler and replacing his with a regime drawn from the resistance leadership. Stauffenberg was able to energize and mobilize the various elements of the conspiracy, to include its intellectual circles, its nerve center within army headquarters in Berlin, as well as resisters at the proposed killing site—Hitler’s operational headquarters in Rastenburg, East Prussia. Orbach’s excellent analysis of the evolution of the army resistance movement—with it multiple personalities, schemes, and coup/assassination attempts—comprises the core of The Plots against Hitler. Ironically, it was a non-army attempt that came closest to killing Hitler, according to the author. Georg Elser, a civilian working alone, became radicalized against the Third Reich prior to the onset of war. Determined that eliminating the leadership was the only way to save Germany from a destructive war, Elser executed a bomb plot without the benefit of any assistance from an outside organization. Skilled in watch-making and handy with explosives, Elser planned to assassinate the Nazi leader at a Berlin beer hall in November 1938 during his appearance at an anniversary celebration of his own “Beer Hall Putsch” of 1923. Elser planned the attempt to perfection; the bomb went off precisely on time. Unfortunately, Hitler did not cooperate; he uncharacteristically cut his remarks short on the night of November 8 and left the venue after less than a ten-minute appearance. Had he been present, Hitler would have surely been killed by the two tons of rubble caused by the bomb’s detonation at 9:20 p.m. Luck and chance favored Hitler, as they did time and time again. There are some noteworthy aspects of The Plots against Hitler. First, the author’s narrative ability is exceptional; the book reads like a novel and readily holds the reader’s interest. A second is its complete lack of hagiography. Orbach never lionizes his subject resisters; in fact, he brings out the humanity in each of them, particularly those with flawed or less than admirable motivations for getting rid of Hitler. Indeed, some resisters were known to have committed mass atrocities or had connections with the notorious SS, even as they decided to join movements aimed at deposing Hitler. It is thus difficult for the reader to place resisters such as the notorious SS general Arthur Nebe into their proper context. Nebe, complicit in heinous crimes on the eastern front as commander of one of the murderous Einsatzgruppen task forces, nonetheless was a long-time opponent of Hitler. Finally, as mentioned previously, Orbach’s use of network analysis is particularly effective in helping the reader make sense of the continually evolving nature of the resistance movement within the army. The book would benefit from some very minor improvements. The first is a general chronology or tabular listing of all resistance movement events such as planned coups or assassination attempts during the period examined by Orbach. In this way, the reader could place each event in the context of what was happening more broadly in the Third Reich during the course of the war. A second recommendation is for the author to comment briefly on how today’s Germany regards the army’s resistance movement in its historical memory; this would complement Orbach’s excellent concluding sections on what motivated resisters to action, as well as his personal ruminations on the meaning of “heroism.” Citation: H-Net Reviews. Montesclaros on Orbach, 'The Plots against Hitler'. H-War. 04-11-2019. https://networks.h-net.org/node/12840/reviews/4001101/montesclaros-orbach-plots-against-hitler Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 2 H-War It is the tragedy of history that all attempts to end Hitler’s reign, and perhaps end the war in Europe earlier than it did, failed. Still, The Plots against Hitler serves as an excellent primer on resistance movements that attempted to remove Hitler by force, particularly those rooted in the German army. Orbach’s structural analysis will interest scholars of the period while the book’s clear prose and riveting narrative will appeal to the general reader as well. All told, Orbach makes an impressive and invaluable contribution to the burgeoning literature on movements that opposed the Third Reich. Citation: Mark Montesclaros. Review of Orbach, Danny,The Plots against Hitler. H-War, H-Net Reviews. April, 2019. URL: http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=52554 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Citation: H-Net Reviews. Montesclaros on Orbach, 'The Plots against Hitler'. H-War. 04-11-2019. https://networks.h-net.org/node/12840/reviews/4001101/montesclaros-orbach-plots-against-hitler Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 3.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Historical Retrospect of the Nazi Party and Its Leaders," (Set No, I, Set of Fourty)
    A historical retrospect of the Nazi Party and its leaders," (Set No, I, set of fourty) 1. November 9th 1923, the Nazi Party with Hitler as its leader felt strong enough to kick the Bavarian G-overnement out of its sad- dle. The marching Nazis when reaching the Odeonsplatz in Munich, were odered to stop. After ignoring the order tostop, they were fired upon and a total of 16 men were killed by machinegun fire. The Nazi Party thereafter was declared as illegal and was forbidden by law. Hitler himself, as the head and leader of the party was cobvicted to spend five years in jail. 2. The"BLOODFLAG", under which the first 16 Nazi victims were killed on November 9th 1923 on the Odeonsplatz at Munich* Later on this flag only was shown to the public when political events of im- portant nature took place. More or less, this flag was considered as a symbol of the party. 3. Hitler in his cell during imprisonment 1924 at Landsberg/Lech The party which had been forbidden, went underground so it couldn't be controlled by governement officials. Fin^llythe Bavarian governe- ment decided to set Hitler free because of J~oo much dangerous un- derground activities of the illegal Nazi party. 4. Adolf Hitler after becoming chancellor of the state, visiting the prison cell at Landsberg/Lech, where he spent nearly ten months. 5. Hitler, holding a speech in Munich on the stairs of the fa- mous " FELDHERRNHALLE ", eleven years after the first 16 members of his party were killed.
    [Show full text]
  • Brienner 45 an Art Project by Benjamin Und Emanuel Heisenberg
    Brienner 45 An art project by Benjamin und Emanuel Heisenberg and Elisophie Eulenburg en Brienner 45 – An art project at the NS-Dokumentations - zentrum Munich by Benjamin and Emanuel Heisenberg and Elisophie Eulenburg Countless reports have etched the images and narratives of the Nazi regime into our collective memory. They accompany us and are yet disconnected from our life today. How can we translate the historical past into our present? What do people who lived in extreme situations actually have in common with us? We may speak the same language, but how do we use the concepts from this time and what kind of images do they evoke in us? These are the questions the work “Brienner 45” asks of the viewer. Through the medium of film the distance between the present and history is nullified and the timespan between today and back then ruptured. In how they juxtapose and sequence images and concepts, the films generate a kind of “stream of consciousness” 1 Excerpt from the “Jäger-Report” on mass across time. This method has an emotional impact and enables executions in Lithuania, written on 1 December past experiences and thoughts to be connected directly with the 1941 by Karl Jäger, Commander of ‘Einsatz- viewer’s here and now. One of the concerns of this work is to kommando (Mobile Killing Squad) 3’ establish a relationship – based on critical reflection – between 2 Chaim, the 14-year-old son of Jewish farmers, our experiences today and the accounts drawn from everyday inserted his last letter in the barbed wire life and the ideological tracts and depiction of crimes committed of the Pustków concentration camp in Galicia in the “Third Reich”.
    [Show full text]
  • Georg Elser (1903–1945)
    Peter Steinbach/Johannes Tuchel Georg Elser (1903–1945) m 8. November 1939, wenige Wochen nach dem Beginn des Zweiten Weltkrie- A ges, schreckte die deutsche Öffentlichkeit ein Anschlag auf, den ein „Mann aus dem Vol- ke“ verübt hatte. Dieser Regimegegner kam sei- nem Ziel, den verhassten Diktator auszuschal- ten, denkbar nahe. Allerdings hatte Hitler nur wenige Minuten vor der Explosion den Ver- sammlungssaal verlassen. Der zunächst uner- kannt gebliebene Attentäter wurde wenig spä- ter eher zufällig beim Versuch festgenommen, in die Schweiz zu entkommen. Überführt wur- de er wegen einiger verdächtiger Gegenstände, die man in seinen Taschen fand, nachdem Zoll- Georg Elser beamte ihn der Polizei übergeben hatten. Nach (1903–1945) tagelangen Verhören gestand der Inhaftierte sei- ne Tat und bekräftigte dabei immer wieder sei- ne Absicht, durch die Tötung Hitlers den Weg zu einem europäischen Frie- den gebahnt haben zu wollen. Es handelte sich um die Tat eines einzelnen Mannes, des schwäbischen Tischlers Georg Elser, der entschlossen, beharr- lich und konsequent den Anschlag geplant hatte. Neben Claus von Stauffen- bergs Anschlag vom 20. Juli 1944 war es die einzige Tat, die dem Leben des deutschen Diktators direkt gefährlich wurde. Während seit den 50er-Jahren Stauffenberg und seine Mitverschworenen langsam nicht mehr primär als „Verräter“, sondern als Widerstandskämpfer gewürdigt wurden, blieb diese Ehrung Elser noch lange Zeit versagt. Er wurde diffamiert, als verschrobe- ner Sonderling oder gar als Handlanger der Gestapo abgestempelt. Obwohl alle seit Ende der 60er-Jahre vorliegenden Quellen seine Alleintäterschaft bezeugen, setzte sich erst langsam seine öffentliche Anerkennung durch.1 Entschluss zum Tyrannenmord Der 1903 im württembergischen Hermaringen geborene Georg Elser wuchs in Königsbronn unter schwierigen Familienverhältnissen auf.
    [Show full text]
  • Life in Nazi Germany – Alarming Facts of the Past
    Dear reader, This is a historical newspaper made by pupils of the 10 th grade. It´s in English because of the so called “bilingual lessons” which means that we have got some subjects in English. The following articles deal with the main topic “What was life in National Socialism like?” While reading you will see there are many articles on different topics made by different groups. In the index you may choose an article and turn to the page you like to. Please enjoy! Yours, 10bil (may 2008) Life in Nazi Germany – alarming facts of the past INDEX Women and Family in Nazi Germany Amelie 2 Laura 4 Young People in Germany at the time of National Socialism Linda & Marike 6 What happened to cultural life in National Socialism? Hannah & Leonie 9 Propaganda Sophie 13 Workers and work Basile 16 Economy in Nazi Germany Josephin 18 Terror in Nazi Germany Paul 20 Opposition / Resistance Greta & Stefanie Sa. 24 German Army Ian 27 Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (NSDAP) (National Socialist German Workers’ Party) Marie 31 Fascism Stefanie St. 34 Sources 36 1 Women and Family in Nazi Germany Amelie In Nazi Germany women had to fulfil a specific role as mothers and wives. Instead of working they should stay at home, cook and take care of their children. Many high-skilled women like teachers, lawyers and doctors were dismissed. After 1939 only few women were left in professional jobs. A common rhyme for women was: "Take hold of kettle, broom and pan, Then you’ll surely get a man! Shop and office leave alone, Your true life work lies at home." To encourage married couples to get many children Hitler introduced the “Law for the Encouragement of Marriage”.
    [Show full text]
  • "We Have Done the Right Thing”
    Danny Orbach. The Plots against Hitler. Boston: Eamon Dolan/Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2016. xvi + 406 pp. $28.00, cloth, ISBN 978-0-544-71443-4. Reviewed by Mark Montesclaros Published on H-War (April, 2019) Commissioned by Margaret Sankey (Air University) Academic interest in resistance movements lief that divine providence protected him in his that defied Hitler’s Third Reich seems to continue quest to fulfill his vision for Germany. Thus, Or‐ unabated. In popular culture, cinematic treat‐ bach’s summary is necessarily a melancholy one: ments such as Valkyrie (2008) and 13 Minutes “So ended the story of the German resistance (2015) introduced broader audiences to those that movement; honorably, perhaps, but in utter fail‐ tried to eliminate Hitler, and in particular to the ure” (p. 266). respective assassins portrayed in each flm, Claus The Plots against Hitler is organized logically, von Stauffenberg and Georg Elser. Both attempts chronologically as well as thematically. The book figure prominently in Danny Orbach’s The Plots begins not with a direct attempt to depose Hitler against Hitler, an effective new study on resisters, but with the well-known burning of the Reichstag primarily in the German military organizations, —the German parliament building—by the ill-fat‐ that tried to defy, depose, or assassinate the infa‐ ed Dutch Communist Marinus van der Lubbe in mous leader of the Third Reich. Orbach’s book en‐ February 1933. Orbach explains that Hitler used compasses the period 1938-44 and is a fascinating this attempt as an excuse to eliminate all possible analysis that makes a solid contribution to the competition to the Nazis—especially the Commu‐ current literature on resistance movements with‐ nists and Social Democrats.
    [Show full text]
  • Ich Habe Den Krieg Verhindern Wollen.«
    » Ich habe den Krieg verhindern wollen.« Der Widerstandskämpfer Georg Elser (1903-1945) Georg Elser mit seinem jüngeren Bruder Leonhard, um 1935 2 Georg Elser, um 1938 1 Am 8. November 1939, wenige Wochen nach dem Beginn des Zweiten Weltkriegs, versuchte der Schreiner Georg Elser, Hitler durch ein Attentat im Münchner Bürgerbräukeller zu töten. Wie jedes Jahr hatten sich in der Traditionsgaststätte an der Rosenheimer Straße die national- sozialistischen »Alten Kämpfer« und Parteigrößen zusammengefunden, um des Putschversuches von 1923 zu gedenken, als um 21.20 Uhr ein Sprengkörper im Pfeiler hinter dem Rednerpult detonierte. Die Explosion verwüstete den mit Fahnen und Wimpeln geschmückten Saal und tötete acht Menschen. Doch Hitler, der an diesem Abend die Veranstaltung nach kurzer Rede früher als erwartet verlassen hatte, um mit einem Sonderzug nach Berlin zurückzukehren, entging dem Anschlag. Türkenstraße 94 (Aufnahme 2009) 3 Eingang des Bürgerbräukellers an der Rosenheimer Straße, 1930er Jahre 4 Persönlichkeit und Herkunft Georg Elsers Wer aber war der Mann, der Hitler töten wollte? Was hatte ihn dazu bewogen, das Attentat zu planen und auszu- führen – allein, ohne Mitwisser oder Helfer, und zu einem Zeitpunkt, als Hitler in seiner Führerrolle unumstritten war? Am 4. Januar 1903 im württembergischen Hermaringen als ältester Sohn eines Landwirts und Holzhändlers geboren, wuchs Georg Elser in Königsbronn in einfachen Verhältnissen auf. Hier ging er zur Volksschule und begann – anfänglich gegen den Willen des Vaters – eine Lehre als Eisendreher. Nachdem er die Ausbildung aus gesund- heitlichen Gründen abbrechen musste, entschied er sich, Schreiner zu werden. Die Gesellenprüfung bestand er 1922 als Bester seines Jahrgangs. Georg Elser war stolz auf seinen Beruf und sein handwerkliches Können, für das er geschätzt und geachtet wurde.
    [Show full text]
  • Germany Revision Guide
    Germany 1918-1939 Revision Guide The origins of the Republic The Legacy of WW1 Fighting had lasted 4 years (1914-1918) 11 million Germans fought in the war, 2 million died. Germany’s debts trebled (x3) between 1914 and 1918 750,000 Germans had died as a result of food shortages There were lots of strikes and protests in Bavaria, Berlin, Kiel (a naval mutiny) and Hamburg The German Revolution 1918-1919 Kaiser Wilhelm abdicated on 9th November 1918. Final straw: lost support from the army. 9th November crowd gathered in Berlin. There were rumours of a communist takeover. Schiedemann, a leading member of the Social Democratic Party (SPD) wanted to keep a moderate government. He ran to the windows of the Reichstag and pronounced the German Republic. 11th November the armistice was signed (a formal agreement to end the war). The Council of People’s Representation- ONLY TEMPORARY UNTIL WEIMAR CONSTITUTION DECIDED UPON Ebert (leader of the SPD) took over as Chancellor. 10th November Ebert agrees with army to prevent communist takeover. He also suspends the old Reichstag and named six politicians as the Council of People’s Representation. Setting up the Weimar Republic November 1918-July 1919 Civil servants (someone who works for the gov.) were kept on by Ebert. This ensured the country was still running. General Groener (the army) was reassured the country wouldn’t be reformed. Ebert won the support of the trade unions by promising an 8 hour working day and industries by promising not to nationalise them. The National Assembly Its job was to create the Weimar Constitution- elected group.
    [Show full text]
  • Terror and Dissent
    Simon Miller Terror and Dissent Towards the Social Structure of Popular Protest in the Third Reich 1941 -1945 Volume I Submitted in partial fulfilment for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Sheffield Department of History September 2005 Abstract Terror and Dissent:Towards the Social Structure of Popular Protest in the Third Reich 1941-1945 by Simon Miler This thesis explores the shape and form of acts of dissent committed by ordinary Germans between 1941 and 1945. Its purpose is to establish the motivations of individuals who contravened a draconian legal code which mandated the death penalty for even minor misdemeanour. In the period considered, German civilian courts sent over 15,000 people to their deaths. Specifically, it looks at the influence of the three milieux (the Social- democratic, Communist and Catholic) most antagonistic towards Nazism on those persons who confronted the Nazi regime. The thesis concentrates on the final four years of Hitlerian rule when Nazi terror was most arbitrary and violent. It makes use of an open-ended understanding of dissent and opposition first established by Martin Broszat in the Bavaria Project in the 1970s. Based on the empirical analysis of over three thousand Gestapo and police records taken from archive holdings in Düsseldorf and Munich, the thesis asks and provides answers to the following questions 1) Was political motivation a key factor in persuading individuals to become involved in oppositional actions? 2) Were opposition forms of action ‘circumstantial’ - that is a product of often spontaneous random reactions - rather than premeditated? 3) Did they follow from any specific known experiences and/ or a process of gestation? 4) Were those involved in such actions socially isolated ‘outsiders’, or were they a part of a distinctive social milieu or sub-culture? 5) Are sociological and geographical patterns of ‘everyday’ resistance perceptible? The thesis places renewed emphasis on the importance of terror, rather than consent, to the maintenance of Nazi rule.
    [Show full text]
  • Alan E. Steinweis
    July 2020 Alan E. Steinweis Department of History [email protected] University of Vermont Wheeler House 133 South Prospect Street Burlington, Vermont 05405 EDUCATION Ph.D., History, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1988 M.A., History, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1982 B.A., History, State University of New York at Binghamton, 1979 ACADEMIC POSITIONS Since 2009: Professor of History, University of Vermont Since 2019: Raul Hilberg Distinguished Professor of Holocaust Studies, UVM 2012-2019: Leonard and Carolyn Miller Distinguished Professor of Holocaust Studies, UVM 1993-2008: Assistant to Full Professor, History and Judaic Studies, University of Nebraska- Lincoln. Holder of the Hyman Rosenberg Professorship of History and Judaic Studies 1989-1993: Assistant Professor, Department of History, Florida State University 1988-1989: Post-Doctoral Fellow, Free University of Berlin 1986-1987: Instructor, Department of History, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill NON-ACADEMIC EMPLOYMENT 1979-1980: National Archives of the United States, Records Declassification Reviewer AWARDS, FELLOWSHIPS, GRANTS, VISITING POSITIONS 2020: Distinguished Achievement Award, Holocaust Education Found. of Northwestern Univ 2018: Ina Levine Senior Invitational Scholar, US Holocaust Memorial Museum (Fall semester) 2013-15: Lehrstuhl für jüdische Geschichte und Kultur (Chair for Jewish History and Culture), University of Munich (October 2013-January 2015) 2011: Gastprofessur zur Erforschung des Holocaust und der deutsch-jüdischen Geschichte (Guest Professor for Research on the Holocaust and German-Jewish History), Fritz Bauer Institute, University of Frankfurt (April-August) 2003: Fulbright Professor, University of Heidelberg (March-July) 2 2002: Visiting Professor, University of Hannover, Germany (May-June) 2002: German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD), short-term grant (July-August) 2001: German Historical Institute grant for the conference “Coming to Terms with the Past in Germany: The 1960’s,” held at Univ.
    [Show full text]
  • German Historical Institute London Bulletin, Vol 37, No
    German Historical Institute London BULLETIN ISSN 0269-8552 Kiran Klaus Patel: Welfare in the Warfare State: Nazi Social Policy on the International Stage German Historical Institute London Bulletin, Vol 37, No. 2 (November 2015), pp3-38 artiCle WELFARE IN THE WARFARE STATE: NAZI SOCIAL POLICY ON THE INTERNATIONAL STAGE Kiran Klaus Patel the evening of 8 november 1939 could have rung the knell on the third reich. a mere thirteen minutes after adolf Hitler left the Bürger bräukeller in Munich, a bomb exploded. seven were dead, over sixty injured. Georg elser, a swabian carpenter far removed from the centre of power, had planned this attempt on the life of the Führer for months, and only failed after last-minute changes in Hitler’s schedule; as every year, his speech at the Bürgerbräukeller to commemorate the Beer Hall Putsch of 1923 (see ill. 1.) had been planned months in advance. His intention to attack the West after the Wehrmacht ’s swift victory over Poland made him initially cancel his speech, then ultimately deliver an abridged version. For this reason, he left the venue earlier than usual. nothing but luck saved the dic - tator’s life; luck that implied disaster for millions. While this assassination attempt is well known, few are aware of what Hitler actually said on that day. in contrast to the speeches he normally gave on these occasions, he spent only a few sentences praising the rise of his party from obscurity to power. instead, he delivered a long and crude tirade against Britain. in tune with his raucous audience as well as his paranoid and psychopathic person - ality, he accused the British government of warmongering, hypocrisy, this text is an extended version of my inaugural lecture as Gerda Henkel Visiting Professor at the German Historical institute london and the london school of economics and Political science in 2014/15.
    [Show full text]
  • GERMANY and AUSTRIA in the 1930S
    GERMANY AND AUSTRIA IN THE 1930s 1929 1930 1931 1932 1933 1934 Unemployment reaches The Great Coalition The German government More than 6 million are Republic and to the Nazi Von Schleicher resigns. concentration camp at Civil War in Austria between 2.8 million in Germany. formed in 1923 between cuts salaries and pensions unemployed in Germany. rise to power. The Nazi Hitler is appointed Dachau is opened for the Austrian army and the the four main pro- of public employees. Party reaches close to Chancellor on January 30 political prisoners. The Social Democratic Party (SDP). Riots break out in Berlin democratic parties in Paul von Hindenburg 38% in the parliamentary and Von Papen is named Enabling Act is passed, The SDP is subsequently between the Communists Germany is dissolved. A banking crisis ensues is reelected President elections (230 seats), Vice-Chancellor. granting Hitler dictatorial banned in Austria. and the police in an Heinrich Brüning forms after the collapse of the of Germany with 53% but during the following powers. Only the Social episode known as a minority government Darmstädter and National of the vote. Adolf Hitler weeks, Hindenburg The German parliament Democrats (SPD) New constitution is enacted in Blutmai (Bloody May). and serves as German Bank (Danat Bank). The comes in second with refuses to name Hitler is dissolved. An arson vote against it in the Austria under Dollfuss, leading Chancellor until 1932. German stock market is 37% and the Communist, Chancellor. attack on the German Reichstag. to authoritarian rule and the U.S. stock market closed until September.
    [Show full text]
  • THE GERMAN SOCIETY of PENNSYLVANIA Elser (13 Minuten)
    ploded at 9:20 p.m., killing 8 and injuring over 60 others. Elser only made one mis- take. He tried to get into Switzerland at a regular border crossing instead of making a THE GERMAN SOCIETY OF Grenzübertritt über die grüne Grenze. He was arrested at the border crossing and PENNSYLVANIA was soon charged with the assassination attempt. Der Film Friday Film Fest Series This movie is the second serious attempt to elevate the reputation of Elser in the ranks of the German Widerstandsbewegung and place him on an equal footing with Stauffenberg. One could actually argue that Elser should be in a special category all by himself. He saw the coming disaster a year before the beginning of the war, unlike Stauffenberg who attempted his plot five years into a war at a point where millions of people had already been killed and the coming German defeat was obvious to every- one. Elser’s foresight and civil courage sets him apart from most other Germans of that time and provides solace to the Nachgeborenen that German resistance to Hitler was not a complete oxymoron. But does this film succeed in elevating the reputation of this working class man to the level of Stauffenberg and his colleagues? Despite a great performance by Christian Friedel as Elser the movie spends perhaps too much time on Elser’s biography, including his time as a dashing young man at Lake Con- stance who enjoys the company of women and in particular his love affair with a married woman. More relevant is the treatment of his time in his Heimatdorf Königs- brunn where he witnessed the slow Nazi takeover of communal life auf der Schwäbischen Alb.
    [Show full text]