Aquatic Zoos

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Aquatic Zoos AQUATIC ZOOS A critical study of UK public aquaria in the year 2004 by Jordi Casamitjana CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4 METHODS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------7 Definition ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------7 Sampling and public aquarium visits --------------------------------------------------------------7 Analysis of the data --------------------------------------------------------------------------------10 UK PUBLIC AQUARIA PROFILE ------------------------------------------------------------------------11 Types of public aquaria ----------------------------------------------------------------------------11 Animals kept in UK public aquaria----------------------------------------------------------------12 Number of exhibits in UK pubic aquaria --------------------------------------------------------18 Biomes of taxa kept in UK public aquaria ------------------------------------------------------19 Exotic versus local taxa kept in UK public aquaria --------------------------------------------20 Trend in the taxa kept in UK public aquaria over the years ---------------------------------21 ANIMAL WELFARE IN UK PUBLIC AQUARIA ------------------------------------------------------23 ABNORMAL BEHAVIOUR --------------------------------------------------------------------------23 Occurrence of stereotypy in UK public aquaria --------------------------------------29 Stereotypic animals per type of public aquarium ------------------------------------31 Types of stereotypic behaviour in UK public aquaria --------------------------------32 Types of animals showing stereotypic behaviour in UK public aquaria ---------–34 ‘Stereotypic flashing’ behaviour --------------------------------------------------------35 Surface Breaking Behaviour (SBB) -----------------------------------------------------38 PHYSICAL HEALTH --------------------------------------------------------------------------------42 Evidence of physical health problems in UK public aquaria ------------------------43 Mortality and Morbidity in UK public aquaria -----------------------------------------46 Husbandry methods in UK public aquaria as cause of animal health problems ---------------------------------------------------51 2 CONSERVATION IN UK PUBLIC AQUARIA ---------------------------------------------------------57 Threatened taxa kept in UK public aquaria------------------------------------------------------59 Animals in UK public aquaria part of co-ordinated captive breeding programmes ----------------------------------------------------61 Reintroduction of animals into the wild by UK public aquaria -------------------------------62 Wild-caught animals in UK public aquaria ------------------------------------------------------65 In situ conservation in UK public aquaria -------------------------------------------------------69 Threatened animals in UK public aquarium restaurants’ menus ----------------------------71 The Seahorses ‘conservation’ flagship -----------------------------------------------------------72 EDUCATION IN UK PUBLIC AQUARIA ---------------------------------------------------------------77 Reading exhibit signs in UK public aquaria -----------------------------------------------------77 Lack of exhibit signs in UK public aquaria ------------------------------------------------------82 The education message of UK public aquaria --------------------------------------------------84 SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN UK PUBLIC AQUARIA -----------------------------------------------90 EXHIBIT DESIGN IN UK PUBLIC AQUARIA --------------------------------------------------------93 Modernity in UK public aquaria exhibits ---------------------------------------------------------96 Exhibit substrates in UK public aquaria ---------------------------------------------------------98 Open/closed tank design in UK public aquaria ----------------------------------------------100 Mixed exhibits in UK public aquaria ------------------------------------------------------------103 Obvious bad exhibits in UK public aquaria ----------------------------------------------------105 ANIMAL/VISITOR INTERACTIONS IN UK PUBLIC AQUARIA -------------------------------109 Visitors touching animals in UK public aquaria -----------------------------------------------109 Visitors touching rays and small sharks in UK public aquaria-------------------------------113 Visitor misconduct in UK public aquaria -------------------------------------------------------116 Visitors diving with fish in UK public aquaria -------------------------------------------------120 CONCLUSIONS --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------122 Specific conclusions -------------------------------------------------------------------------------122 General conclusions ------------------------------------------------------------------------------125 BIBLIOGRAPHY -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------128 3 INTRODUCTION Just as zoos are, public aquaria are a common and well-known feature of modern industrialised society. It is almost impossible not to come across one when browsing any developed country tourist information brochure, especially when looking at big cities by the sea, or coastal tourist resources. The first known ‘modern’ public aquarium was the fish house at London Zoo, which opened in 1853 (Gosse, 1854). Soon public aquaria became quite popular in the Victorian era and were quickly constructed all throughout Europe (Gilbert, 1970). Since then, pretty much every fish that can be caught alive has been taken to public aquaria for exhibition, even if many might have not survived for long. Contrary to the popular belief, sharks began being displayed in public aquaria from the very beginning (Koob, 2001), in cities such as Berlin (1869), Frankfurt (1872), Napels (1874), Hamburg (1884), Helgoland (1892), Rovigno (1892), New York (1896), Monaco (1905), and, of course, Brighton (1872) and Plymouth (1888), which together with London probably represent the three main cities that gave birth to the public aquarium industry in the UK. By 1920 over 45 major public aquaria in the world were already drawing 10 million visitors a year (Koob, 2001). Since then the public aquarium industry has flourished even more. A survey of the main European public aquaria undertaken six years ago (Blanch et al, 1999) found that in the whole of EU there were 70 public aquaria, 17 of which could be classed as new-generation ‘exhibition’ aquaria, which are characterised for their big sizes (between 1,400 and 18,000 square metres), big investments (between €4,5 and €92.5 million), huge water volumes (between 300 and 6000 cubic metres) and very big tanks (the biggest holding 4,700 cubic metres of water). Although in terms of investment and sizes American and Japanese new generation public aquaria outperform the EU ones, overall it does seem that public aquaria are growing both in numbers and sizes, all over the world. The same survey concluded that in 1998 Europe’s leading public aquaria attracted 17,615,000 visitors, almost doubling the world figures for 80 years earlier. Although it is difficult to ascertain the accuracy of these estimations –it is obvious that the survey only looked at the main centres of each country– this information, together with the general impression of the state of the industry in the first years of this century, points towards the conclusion that the public aquarium industry is thriving rather than receding. Indeed, the number of free-standing members of public aquaria in the American Zoo and Aquarium Association has more than doubled since 1989 (Hunter, 2003), and the number of new chains of public aquaria has proliferated in the last three years in the UK. More than ever, it seems, fish and aquatic invertebrates are being kept in captivity for exhibition, and if there was ever anything wrong with this, or if ever there had been a more likely time to find aquatic animals exposed to the wrong environment, now seems to be the time to look at the problems public aquaria cause to the millions of animals they exhibit. There are, however, other reasons beyond numbers for paying attention now to the welfare of animals kept in public aquaria. Some species that up until now had managed to escape life in an aquarium (i.e. deep sea animals, or the biggest sharks) are under increasing pressure of being the first to be exhibited by those public aquaria that try to beat the growing number of competitors by having something nobody else has. More and more animals exhibited are forced closer and closer to the general public in order to exploit people’s thirst for ‘close up’ and ‘hands on’ experiences, without which a visit to the already commonly seen aquarium would perhaps be too boring. The recent incorporation of new practices into the landscape of UK public aquaria, such as visitors diving with sharks, are opening new possibilities of animal welfare and human safety problems that were not possible a few years ago. The popularity of the recent film “Finding Nemo” has put fish into people’s conscience in such a way that it seems to have awoken in some the realisation that, after all, fish are sentient beings with the same kind of problems any captive animal has. However, it also has generated an increase of the acquisition
Recommended publications
  • Hunting in Archerfish – an Ecological Perspective on a Remarkable Combination of Skills Stefan Schuster*
    © 2018. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | Journal of Experimental Biology (2018) 221, jeb159723. doi:10.1242/jeb.159723 REVIEW Hunting in archerfish – an ecological perspective on a remarkable combination of skills Stefan Schuster* ABSTRACT and van Leeuwen, 2004) or mantids (Rossel, 1983)] at prey. Thus, Archerfish are well known for using jets of water to dislodge distant this Review may be of interest also to those studying non-spitting aerial prey from twigs or leaves. This Review gives a brief overview of a creatures. It should also be useful for researchers investigating number of skills that the fish need to secure prey with their shooting which properties of brains might be crucial for allowing some technique. Archerfish are opportunistic hunters and, even in the wild, species to use tools, imitate others or show insight into the tasks shoot at artificial objects to determine whether these are rewarding. demanded of them (e.g. Sol et al., 2005; Emery, 2006; Huber et al., They can detect non-moving targets and use efficient search strategies 2009; Morand-Ferron et al., 2016; Cauchoix et al., 2017; Powell with characteristics of human visual search. Their learning of how to et al., 2017; Street et al., 2017). Here, archerfish illustrate how engage targets can be remarkably efficient and can show impressive difficult it is to devise standardized tests that could compare learning ‘ ’ degrees of generalization, including learning from observation. In other and cognition across species. Such tests would require a detailed cases, however, the fish seem unable to learn and it requires some understanding of basic environmental constraints that can understanding of the ecological and biophysical constraints to sometimes be far from obvious.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Characteristics
    FISH CHARACTERISTICS There are approximately 25,000 different species of fish. A fish is an animal with a backbone (a vertebrate) that is adapted to live in water. Fishes use gills to breathe, and most fishes have scales covering their skin. Scales serve as a form of protection. Fishes are also cold-blooded, which means that their body temperature is regulated by the temperature of the surrounding water. Bony fishes inhabit almost every body of water, from tropical, polar, and temperate seas, to freshwater and brackish environments. Scientists discover about 200-300 new fish species every year. Believe it or not, there are more fishes on our planet than birds or mammals. Dorsal (back) fin Do you enjoy gymnastics? Have you ever watched a gymnast on the balance beam? They need to stay Caudal (tail) fin nice and steady, placing one foot Pectoral (side) fin gently over the next, to stay steady Have you ever helped your Have you ever pretended and straight. The dorsal fin helps a mom or dad check the oil in the you were a race car driver, fish to swim steady and provides family car? You need to check zooming down the track? balance in the water. the engine because the engine You speed through the helps the car to move fast - it straight-a-way and then turn gives the car speed and power! the steering wheel quickly In most fish, the caudal fin when you reach the curve to provides the speed and power go left or right. The pectoral for swimming, just like a car fin is just like a steering engine.
    [Show full text]
  • §4-71-6.5 LIST of CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ANIMALS November
    §4-71-6.5 LIST OF CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ANIMALS November 28, 2006 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME INVERTEBRATES PHYLUM Annelida CLASS Oligochaeta ORDER Plesiopora FAMILY Tubificidae Tubifex (all species in genus) worm, tubifex PHYLUM Arthropoda CLASS Crustacea ORDER Anostraca FAMILY Artemiidae Artemia (all species in genus) shrimp, brine ORDER Cladocera FAMILY Daphnidae Daphnia (all species in genus) flea, water ORDER Decapoda FAMILY Atelecyclidae Erimacrus isenbeckii crab, horsehair FAMILY Cancridae Cancer antennarius crab, California rock Cancer anthonyi crab, yellowstone Cancer borealis crab, Jonah Cancer magister crab, dungeness Cancer productus crab, rock (red) FAMILY Geryonidae Geryon affinis crab, golden FAMILY Lithodidae Paralithodes camtschatica crab, Alaskan king FAMILY Majidae Chionocetes bairdi crab, snow Chionocetes opilio crab, snow 1 CONDITIONAL ANIMAL LIST §4-71-6.5 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Chionocetes tanneri crab, snow FAMILY Nephropidae Homarus (all species in genus) lobster, true FAMILY Palaemonidae Macrobrachium lar shrimp, freshwater Macrobrachium rosenbergi prawn, giant long-legged FAMILY Palinuridae Jasus (all species in genus) crayfish, saltwater; lobster Panulirus argus lobster, Atlantic spiny Panulirus longipes femoristriga crayfish, saltwater Panulirus pencillatus lobster, spiny FAMILY Portunidae Callinectes sapidus crab, blue Scylla serrata crab, Samoan; serrate, swimming FAMILY Raninidae Ranina ranina crab, spanner; red frog, Hawaiian CLASS Insecta ORDER Coleoptera FAMILY Tenebrionidae Tenebrio molitor mealworm,
    [Show full text]
  • Feeding Activities of Two Euryhaline Small-Sized Fish in a Western Baltic Brackish Fjord
    HELGOL.~NDER MEERESUNTERSUCHUNGEN Helgolander Meeresunters. 45,287-300 (1991) Feeding activities of two euryhaline small-sized fish in a western Baltic brackish fjord Birgit Antholz, Wolfgang Meyer-Antholz & C. Dieter Zander Zoologisches Institut und Zoologisches Museum der Universit~t Hamburg; Martin-Luther-King-Platz 3, D-W-2000 Hamburg 13, Federal Repubfic of Germany ABSTRACT: The daily food intake and feeding activities of the common goby Pomatoschistus microps (Kroyer) and the nine-spined stickleback Pungitius pungitius (L.) were investigated in the brackish Schlei fjord. At the investigation site of Olpenitz, salinities varied between 11 and 15 %o, and water temperatures between 5 and 18 ~ during the period of in-situ experiments in 1981 and 1982. Common gobies sometimes attained a density of more than 100 individuals per square metre, nine-spined sticklebacks as much as 18 individuals per square meter. Their food changed depend- ing on the supply of plankton or benthos. Regarding numbers, their food consisted mainly of harpacticoids, in springtimes of calanoids; with regard to weight, amphipods, polychaetes or chironomid larvae often prevailed. The total food ingestion, measured by means of its relation to fish weights (fullness index), was highest in spring and summer: 2.3 % in P. microps and 2.6 % in P. pungitius. Low fullness indices of 0.8 % in P. microps and 0.3 % in P. pungitius were found during times of low water temperatures. 24-h field investigations revealed that the adult P. microps presented clear diurnal rhythms with highest fullness indices after dawn and a further maximum at dusk. Only young gobies ingested some benthos at night.
    [Show full text]
  • FIELD GUIDE to WARMWATER FISH DISEASES in CENTRAL and EASTERN EUROPE, the CAUCASUS and CENTRAL ASIA Cover Photographs: Courtesy of Kálmán Molnár and Csaba Székely
    SEC/C1182 (En) FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular I SSN 2070-6065 FIELD GUIDE TO WARMWATER FISH DISEASES IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE, THE CAUCASUS AND CENTRAL ASIA Cover photographs: Courtesy of Kálmán Molnár and Csaba Székely. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No. 1182 SEC/C1182 (En) FIELD GUIDE TO WARMWATER FISH DISEASES IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE, THE CAUCASUS AND CENTRAL ASIA By Kálmán Molnár1, Csaba Székely1 and Mária Láng2 1Institute for Veterinary Medical Research, Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary 2 National Food Chain Safety Office – Veterinary Diagnostic Directorate, Budapest, Hungary FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Ankara, 2019 Required citation: Molnár, K., Székely, C. and Láng, M. 2019. Field guide to the control of warmwater fish diseases in Central and Eastern Europe, the Caucasus and Central Asia. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No.1182. Ankara, FAO. 124 pp. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO.
    [Show full text]
  • Management and Breeding of Birds of Paradise (Family Paradisaeidae) at the Al Wabra Wildlife Preservation
    Management and breeding of Birds of Paradise (family Paradisaeidae) at the Al Wabra Wildlife Preservation. By Richard Switzer Bird Curator, Al Wabra Wildlife Preservation. Presentation for Aviary Congress Singapore, November 2008 Introduction to Birds of Paradise in the Wild Taxonomy The family Paradisaeidae is in the order Passeriformes. In the past decade since the publication of Frith and Beehler (1998), the taxonomy of the family Paradisaeidae has been re-evaluated considerably. Frith and Beehler (1998) listed 42 species in 17 genera. However, the monotypic genus Macgregoria (MacGregor’s Bird of Paradise) has been re-classified in the family Meliphagidae (Honeyeaters). Similarly, 3 species in 2 genera (Cnemophilus and Loboparadisea) – formerly described as the “Wide-gaped Birds of Paradise” – have been re-classified as members of the family Melanocharitidae (Berrypeckers and Longbills) (Cracraft and Feinstein 2000). Additionally the two genera of Sicklebills (Epimachus and Drepanornis) are now considered to be combined as the one genus Epimachus. These changes reduce the total number of genera in the family Paradisaeidae to 13. However, despite the elimination of the 4 species mentioned above, 3 species have been newly described – Berlepsch's Parotia (P. berlepschi), Eastern or Helen’s Parotia (P. helenae) and the Eastern or Growling Riflebird (P. intercedens). The Berlepsch’s Parotia was once considered to be a subspecies of the Carola's Parotia. It was previously known only from four female specimens, discovered in 1985. It was rediscovered during a Conservation International expedition in 2005 and was photographed for the first time. The Eastern Parotia, also known as Helena's Parotia, is sometimes considered to be a subspecies of Lawes's Parotia, but differs in the male’s frontal crest and the female's dorsal plumage colours.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CASE AGAINST Marine Mammals in Captivity Authors: Naomi A
    s l a m m a y t T i M S N v I i A e G t A n i p E S r a A C a C E H n T M i THE CASE AGAINST Marine Mammals in Captivity The Humane Society of the United State s/ World Society for the Protection of Animals 2009 1 1 1 2 0 A M , n o t s o g B r o . 1 a 0 s 2 u - e a t i p s u S w , t e e r t S h t u o S 9 8 THE CASE AGAINST Marine Mammals in Captivity Authors: Naomi A. Rose, E.C.M. Parsons, and Richard Farinato, 4th edition Editors: Naomi A. Rose and Debra Firmani, 4th edition ©2009 The Humane Society of the United States and the World Society for the Protection of Animals. All rights reserved. ©2008 The HSUS. All rights reserved. Printed on recycled paper, acid free and elemental chlorine free, with soy-based ink. Cover: ©iStockphoto.com/Ying Ying Wong Overview n the debate over marine mammals in captivity, the of the natural environment. The truth is that marine mammals have evolved physically and behaviorally to survive these rigors. public display industry maintains that marine mammal For example, nearly every kind of marine mammal, from sea lion Iexhibits serve a valuable conservation function, people to dolphin, travels large distances daily in a search for food. In learn important information from seeing live animals, and captivity, natural feeding and foraging patterns are completely lost.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case for a Dolphin Sea Refuge in Italy: a Concept Paper
    THE CASE FOR A DOLPHIN SEA REFUGE IN ITALY: A CONCEPT PAPER GIUSEPPE NOTARBARTOLO DI SCIARA TETHYS RESEARCH INSTITUTE | VIALE G.B. GADIO 2, 20121 MILAN, ITALY JOAN GONZALVO TETHYS RESEARCH INSTITUTE | VIALE G.B. GADIO 2, 20121 MILAN, ITALY SANDRO MAZZARIOL RIVIERA BOSCO PICCOLO 101, 30034 MIRA (VE), ITALY GAIA ANGELINI LAV | VIALE REGINA MARGHERITA 177, 00198 ROMA, ITALY CATHY WILLIAMSON WHALE AND DOLPHIN CONSERVATION | BROOKFIELD HOUSE, 38 ST PAUL ST, CHIPPENHAM SN15 1LJ, UNITED KINGDOM espite an increasing human global population, urbanization and industrialization, our interest Din animal welfare continues to increase. Indeed, despite great social, political and civil concerns, Mahatma Gandhi is reported as stating “The greatness of a nation can be judged by the way its animals are treated”. Thus it is imperative that we examine the way we currently treat dolphins and whales, species known for their intelligence and complex social interactions, and strive to improve our behaviour with respect to these animals. Rather than use these animals as sources of entertainment in conditions that do not meet their social and physical needs, we must develop facilities that can humanely care for sick and stranded animals, and provide refuge for animals without housing options. The development of a dolphin refuge in Italy will represent an important milestone in the evolution of our attitude to cetaceans. Frances M.D. Gulland, Vet DM, PhD Marine Mammal Center, Sausalito, California 1 WHYWHY AA DOLPHINDOLPHIN REFUGEREFUGE ININ ITALYITALY major campaign against dolphins in captivity guidelines2. conducted in Europe by several organisations A such as the Born Free Foundation, Whale Such facility could also support any possible and Dolphin Conservation, the Italian Lega Anti rehabilitation efforts of wild dolphins that strand Vivisezione LAV and Marevivo is beginning to bear alive.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Starfish on an Essex Oyster Bed
    J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. (1958) 37, 565-589 Printed in Great Britain NOTES ON STARFISH ON AN ESSEX OYSTER BED By D. A. HANCOCK Fisheries Laboratory, Burnham-on-Crouch (Text-figs. 1-9) In a previous paper (Hancock, 1955) an account was given of the feeding behaviour of the starfish Asterias rubens L. and the common sunstar Solaster papposus (L.) on Essex oyster beds. In discussion, it was stated that there was no evidence that, in the conditions described, a cultivated oyster ground provided a greater attraction than an uncultivated one. The present work was undertaken to provide information on this subject, and also on the movements, growth and ecological relationships of starfish. Further experiments were made on feeding behaviour, particularly of the young starfish. Samples required to give information on the growth and distribution of starfish were obtained from regular surveys of an oyster bed, by a series of parallel dredge hauls covering both cultivated and derelict bottoms. In November 1954, a section of oyster ground, 125 m wide, and stretching from one bank to the other (Fig. 1),was marked out at the Southward Laying, River Crouch. The first dredge haul was made with two 4 ft. 6in. dredges over the 125 m width, parallel to the edge of the north shore at L.W.a.S.T. and 10 m from it. Buoys were used to mark distances offshore, and subsequent dredge hauls were made parallel with each other 20 m apart, and, when time permitted, were continued as far as the south shore, giving a total of twenty-six stations.
    [Show full text]
  • CLAY OKOTH OBOTA Thesis.Pdf (866.6Kb)
    ii REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY OF EXPLOITED POPULATIONS OF THE EMPEROR ANGELFISH, Pomacanthus imperator BLOCH, 1787 ALONG THE KENYAN COAST CLAY OKOTH OBOTA A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Fisheries of Pwani University MAY, 2016 ii DECLARATION iii DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to my K’Ochero family, classmates and friends who stood by me. I will always remember your words of encouragement and support when I needed you. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This study was undertaken with the invaluable academic guidance from my supervisors, Dr. Bernerd Fulanda (Pwani University) and Dr. Edward Kimani (KMFRI). I further thank them for patience throughout this study and ensuring that despite their advice and opinions, I was the sole driver of my study project and hence fully responsible for my thesis and making sure that my study project was scientifically sound and practically workable, as could possibly be. Many thanks go to the Director KMFRI for support and provision of laboratory working space. My gratitude goes to Jibril Olunga and KMFRI interns for their assistance in laboratory work. To the long list of the rest of the people who helped shape both the field work, analysis and write up in one way or the other, may God bless you abundantly your help was greatly appreciated. This work was financially supported by the Kenya Coastal Development Project (KCDP) through a student fellowship grant; to KMFRI and KCDP, I would like to say "A big thank you". v ABSTRACT Substantial proportion of the Pomacanthus imperator are traded in terms of value and quantity and also harvested as food in the artisanal fishery in Kenya.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes of Terengganu East Coast of Malay Peninsula, Malaysia Ii Iii
    i Fishes of Terengganu East coast of Malay Peninsula, Malaysia ii iii Edited by Mizuki Matsunuma, Hiroyuki Motomura, Keiichi Matsuura, Noor Azhar M. Shazili and Mohd Azmi Ambak Photographed by Masatoshi Meguro and Mizuki Matsunuma iv Copy Right © 2011 by the National Museum of Nature and Science, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu and Kagoshima University Museum All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written permission from the publisher. Copyrights of the specimen photographs are held by the Kagoshima Uni- versity Museum. For bibliographic purposes this book should be cited as follows: Matsunuma, M., H. Motomura, K. Matsuura, N. A. M. Shazili and M. A. Ambak (eds.). 2011 (Nov.). Fishes of Terengganu – east coast of Malay Peninsula, Malaysia. National Museum of Nature and Science, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu and Kagoshima University Museum, ix + 251 pages. ISBN 978-4-87803-036-9 Corresponding editor: Hiroyuki Motomura (e-mail: [email protected]) v Preface Tropical seas in Southeast Asian countries are well known for their rich fish diversity found in various environments such as beautiful coral reefs, mud flats, sandy beaches, mangroves, and estuaries around river mouths. The South China Sea is a major water body containing a large and diverse fish fauna. However, many areas of the South China Sea, particularly in Malaysia and Vietnam, have been poorly studied in terms of fish taxonomy and diversity. Local fish scientists and students have frequently faced difficulty when try- ing to identify fishes in their home countries. During the International Training Program of the Japan Society for Promotion of Science (ITP of JSPS), two graduate students of Kagoshima University, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Scholars Academic Journal of Biosciences
    Scholars Academic Journal of Biosciences Abbreviated Key Title: Sch Acad J Biosci ISSN 2347-9515 (Print) | ISSN 2321-6883 (Online) Zoology Journal homepage: https://saspublishers.com A Comprehensive Review on the Prevalence and Dissemination of Some Bacterial Diseases in Ornamental Fishes and Their Preventive Measures Arnab Chatterjee1#, Sucharita Ghosh2#, Ritwick Bhattacharya1#, Soumendranath Chatterjee2, Nimai Chandra Saha1* 1Fishery and Ecotoxicology Research Laboratory (Vice-Chancellor’s Research Group), Department of Zoology, the University of Burdwan, Burdwan 713104, West Bengal, India 2Parasitology & Microbiology Research Laboratory, Department of Zoology, the University of Burdwan, Burdwan, West Bengal, India #Authors contributed equally DOI: 10.36347/sajb.2020.v08i11.005 | Received: 06.11.2020 | Accepted: 17.11.2020 | Published: 20.11.2020 *Corresponding author: Nimai Chandra Saha Abstract Review Article As a consequential sector within the fisheries segment, ornamental fisheries have become a billion-dollar industry. At current, it is estimated that the aquarium industry is worth about 15 billion dollars. In ornamental aquaculture and aquarium keeping, the incidence of diseases is the main quandary that emerges during culture and deplorably affects the profitability of the ventures. Diseases are caused by viruses, protozoa, bacteria, fungi, and parasites under profound culture conditions, and the likelihood of stress elevates in an immensely colossal portion of the stock. Of these, the most paramount causes of sudden fish death are infectious and bacterial diseases. Nowadays, veterinary antibiotic treatment of contaminated fish is being applied in most of the States of India. Disease obviation is often less costly than treating disease outbreaks when it is subsisting. Adopting and implementing a health management strategy would not assure a disease-free facility that ultimately leads to considerably decremented chances of dissemination of diseases.
    [Show full text]