Draft Environmental Assessment & Anticipated

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Draft Environmental Assessment & Anticipated DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT & ANTICIPATED FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT, CALTECH SUBMILLIMETER OBSERVATORY DECOMMISSIONING PREPARED FOR: California Institute of Technology PREPARED BY: JULY 2021 DEA/AFONSI, Caltech Submillimeter Observatory Decommissioning Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 1-1 OVERVIEW OF THE PROPOSED ACTION ................................................................................ 1-4 PURPOSE OF THE PROPOSED ACTION ................................................................................... 1-4 NEED FOR THE PROPOSED ACTION ...................................................................................... 1-5 PURPOSE OF THIS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT .............................................................. 1-5 PERMITS AND APPROVALS ................................................................................................... 1-5 ORGANIZATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ..................................................... 1-6 CHAPTER 2: DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION.................................................. 2-1 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION ............................................................................ 2-1 2.1.1 Description of Existing Facilities ............................................................................................ 2-1 2.1.2 CSO Deconstruction and Removal Methodology ................................................................... 2-3 2.1.3 Site Restoration Methodology ............................................................................................... 2-19 2.1.4 Funding of Future Shared Infrastructure Removal ................................................................ 2-23 2.1.5 Restoration Effectiveness Monitoring ................................................................................... 2-25 PRELIMINARY SCHEDULE FOR THE PROPOSED ACTION ..................................................... 2-25 PROJECT BUDGET .............................................................................................................. 2-26 CHAPTER 3: PROJECT ALTERNATIVES ......................................................................... 3-1 FRAMEWORK FOR CONSIDERATION OF ALTERNATIVES ....................................................... 3-1 IDENTIFICATION OF FEASIBLE ALTERNATIVES .................................................................... 3-2 ALTERNATIVES FOR DETAILED CONSIDERATION ................................................................. 3-3 3.3.1 ALT-1: No Action ................................................................................................................... 3-3 3.3.2 ALT-2: Complete Facility and Infrastructure Removal with Full Restoration ........................ 3-3 3.3.3 ALT-3: Complete Facility and Infrastructure Removal with Moderate Restoration ............... 3-4 3.3.4 ALT-4: Facility Removal, Infrastructure Capping, and Moderate Restoration ....................... 3-6 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED BUT REJECTED .................................................................... 3-10 3.4.1 Reduced Scale Alternative ..................................................................................................... 3-10 3.4.2 Delayed Action Alternative ................................................................................................... 3-10 3.4.3 Alternative Location .............................................................................................................. 3-11 CHAPTER 4: EXISTING ENVIRONMENT, POTENTIAL IMPACTS, AND MITIGATION ................................................................................................................ 4-1 ARCHAEOLOGY ................................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1.1 Context ..................................................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1.2 Prior Studies ............................................................................................................................ 4-4 4.1.3 Fieldwork and Findings ........................................................................................................... 4-8 4.1.4 Potential Impacts ................................................................................................................... 4-10 4.1.5 Mitigation Measures .............................................................................................................. 4-10 CULTURAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT ...................................................................................... 4-10 4.2.1 Context ................................................................................................................................... 4-10 Page i DEA/AFONSI, Caltech Submillimeter Observatory Decommissioning Table of Contents 4.2.2 Cultural Overview ................................................................................................................. 4-11 4.2.3 Consultation ........................................................................................................................... 4-12 4.2.4 Potential Impacts ................................................................................................................... 4-16 4.2.5 Mitigation Measures .............................................................................................................. 4-18 BIOLOGY ........................................................................................................................... 4-18 4.3.1 Context ................................................................................................................................... 4-18 4.3.2 Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................... 4-18 4.3.3 Potential Impacts ................................................................................................................... 4-23 4.3.4 Mitigation Measures .............................................................................................................. 4-25 VISUAL AND AESTHETIC RESOURCES ................................................................................ 4-25 4.4.1 Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................... 4-26 4.4.2 Potential Impacts ................................................................................................................... 4-27 4.4.3 Mitigation Measures .............................................................................................................. 4-27 GEOLOGY AND TOPOGRAPHY ............................................................................................ 4-29 4.5.1 Context ................................................................................................................................... 4-29 4.5.2 Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................... 4-33 4.5.3 Potential Impacts ................................................................................................................... 4-34 4.5.4 Mitigation Measures .............................................................................................................. 4-34 HYDROLOGY ..................................................................................................................... 4-34 4.6.1 Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................... 4-35 4.6.2 Potential Impacts ................................................................................................................... 4-49 4.6.3 Mitigation Measures .............................................................................................................. 4-54 SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE ....................................................................................... 4-54 4.7.1 Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................... 4-54 4.7.2 Potential Impacts ................................................................................................................... 4-56 4.7.3 Mitigation Measures .............................................................................................................. 4-56 TRAFFIC ............................................................................................................................ 4-57 4.8.1 Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................... 4-57 4.8.2 Potential Impacts ................................................................................................................... 4-59 4.8.3 Mitigation Measures .............................................................................................................. 4-61 NOISE ................................................................................................................................ 4-62 4.9.1 Context ................................................................................................................................... 4-62 4.9.2 Existing Conditions ..............................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Imaginative Geographies of Mars: the Science and Significance of the Red Planet, 1877 - 1910
    Copyright by Kristina Maria Doyle Lane 2006 The Dissertation Committee for Kristina Maria Doyle Lane Certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: IMAGINATIVE GEOGRAPHIES OF MARS: THE SCIENCE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE RED PLANET, 1877 - 1910 Committee: Ian R. Manners, Supervisor Kelley A. Crews-Meyer Diana K. Davis Roger Hart Steven D. Hoelscher Imaginative Geographies of Mars: The Science and Significance of the Red Planet, 1877 - 1910 by Kristina Maria Doyle Lane, B.A.; M.S.C.R.P. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin August 2006 Dedication This dissertation is dedicated to Magdalena Maria Kost, who probably never would have understood why it had to be written and certainly would not have wanted to read it, but who would have been very proud nonetheless. Acknowledgments This dissertation would have been impossible without the assistance of many extremely capable and accommodating professionals. For patiently guiding me in the early research phases and then responding to countless followup email messages, I would like to thank Antoinette Beiser and Marty Hecht of the Lowell Observatory Library and Archives at Flagstaff. For introducing me to the many treasures held deep underground in our nation’s capital, I would like to thank Pam VanEe and Ed Redmond of the Geography and Map Division of the Library of Congress in Washington, D.C. For welcoming me during two brief but productive visits to the most beautiful library I have seen, I thank Brenda Corbin and Gregory Shelton of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • A Precise and Accurate Determination of the Cosmic Microwave Background Temperature at Z =0.89
    A&A 551, A109 (2013) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220613 & c ESO 2013 Astrophysics A precise and accurate determination of the cosmic microwave background temperature at z =0.89 S. Muller1, A. Beelen2,J.H.Black1,S.J.Curran3,4, C. Horellou1,S.Aalto1, F. Combes5, M. Guélin6,7, and C. Henkel8,9 1 Department of Earth and Space Sciences, Chalmers University of Technology, Onsala Space Observatory, 439 92 Onsala, Sweden e-mail: [email protected] 2 Institut d’Astrophysique Spatiale, Bât. 121, Université Paris-Sud, 91405 Orsay Cedex, France 3 Sydney Institute for Astronomy, School of Physics, The University of Sydney, 2006 NSW, Australia 4 ARC Centre of Excellence for All-sky Astrophysics (CAASTRO), Australia 5 Observatoire de Paris, LERMA, CNRS, 61 Av. de l’Observatoire, 75014 Paris, France 6 Institut de Radioastronomie Millimétrique, 300 rue de la piscine, 38406 Saint-Martin d’Hères, France 7 École Normale Supérieure/LERMA, 24 rue Lhomond, 75005 Paris, France 8 Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastonomie, Auf dem Hügel 69, 53121 Bonn, Germany 9 Astron. Dept., King Abdulaziz University, PO Box 80203, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia Received 22 October 2012 / Accepted 21 December 2012 ABSTRACT Context. According to the Big Bang theory and as a consequence of adiabatic expansion of the Universe, the temperature of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) increases linearly with redshift. This relation is, however, poorly explored, and detection of any deviation would directly lead to (astro-)physics beyond the standard model. Aims. We aim to measure the temperature of the CMB with an accuracy of a few percent at z = 0.89 toward the molecular absorber in the galaxy lensing the quasar PKS 1830−211.
    [Show full text]
  • Martian Crater Morphology
    ANALYSIS OF THE DEPTH-DIAMETER RELATIONSHIP OF MARTIAN CRATERS A Capstone Experience Thesis Presented by Jared Howenstine Completion Date: May 2006 Approved By: Professor M. Darby Dyar, Astronomy Professor Christopher Condit, Geology Professor Judith Young, Astronomy Abstract Title: Analysis of the Depth-Diameter Relationship of Martian Craters Author: Jared Howenstine, Astronomy Approved By: Judith Young, Astronomy Approved By: M. Darby Dyar, Astronomy Approved By: Christopher Condit, Geology CE Type: Departmental Honors Project Using a gridded version of maritan topography with the computer program Gridview, this project studied the depth-diameter relationship of martian impact craters. The work encompasses 361 profiles of impacts with diameters larger than 15 kilometers and is a continuation of work that was started at the Lunar and Planetary Institute in Houston, Texas under the guidance of Dr. Walter S. Keifer. Using the most ‘pristine,’ or deepest craters in the data a depth-diameter relationship was determined: d = 0.610D 0.327 , where d is the depth of the crater and D is the diameter of the crater, both in kilometers. This relationship can then be used to estimate the theoretical depth of any impact radius, and therefore can be used to estimate the pristine shape of the crater. With a depth-diameter ratio for a particular crater, the measured depth can then be compared to this theoretical value and an estimate of the amount of material within the crater, or fill, can then be calculated. The data includes 140 named impact craters, 3 basins, and 218 other impacts. The named data encompasses all named impact structures of greater than 100 kilometers in diameter.
    [Show full text]
  • CASKAR: a CASPER Concept for the SKA Phase 1 Signal Processing Sub-System
    CASKAR: A CASPER concept for the SKA phase 1 Signal Processing Sub-system Francois Kapp, SKA SA Outline • Background • Technical – Architecture – Power • Cost • Schedule • Challenges/Risks • Conclusions Background CASPER Technology MeerKAT Who is CASPER? • Berkeley Wireless Research Center • Nancay Observatory • UC Berkeley Radio Astronomy Lab • Oxford University Astrophysics • UC Berkeley Space Sciences Lab • Metsähovi Radio Observatory, Helsinki University of • Karoo Array Telescope / SKA - SA Technology • NRAO - Green Bank • New Jersey Institute of Technology • NRAO - Socorro • West Virginia University Department of Physics • Allen Telescope Array • University of Iowa Department of Astronomy and • MIT Haystack Observatory Physics • Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics • Ohio State University Electroscience Lab • Caltech • Hong Kong University Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering • Cornell University • Hartebeesthoek Radio Astronomy Observatory • NAIC - Arecibo Observatory • INAF - Istituto di Radioastronomia, Northern Cross • UC Berkeley - Leuschner Observatory Radiotelescope • Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope • University of Manchester, Jodrell Bank Centre for • Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Academia Sinica Astrophysics • National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of • Submillimeter Array Sciences • NRAO - Tucson / University of Arizona Department of • CSIRO - Australia Telescope National Facility Astronomy • Parkes Observatory • Center for Astrophysics and Supercomputing, Swinburne University
    [Show full text]
  • Maser Observations with New Instruments
    Cosmic Masers - from OH to H0 Proceedings IAU Symposium No. 287, 2012 c 2012 International Astronomical Union E. Humphreys & W. Vlemmings, eds. DOI: 00.0000/X000000000000000X Maser observations with new instruments Alwyn Wootten1 1North American ALMA Science Center, NRAOy, 520 Edgemont Rd., Charlottesville, Virginia 22903, USA email: [email protected] Abstract. The Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA)y, and the Jansky Very Large Array (JVLA) have recently begun probing the Universe. Both provide the largest collect- ing area available at locations on a high dry site, endowing them with unparalleled potential for sensitive spectral line observations. Over the next few years, these telescopes will be joined by other telescopes to provide advances in maser science, including NOEMA and the LMT. Other instruments of note for maser science which may commence construction include the North American Array, the CCAT, and an enlarged worldwide VLB network outfitted to operate into the millimeter wavelength regime. Keywords. masers, radio lines: ISM, instrumentation: high angular resolution 1. Introduction At the last IAU Symposium on masers, construction had just begun on the Atacama Large Millimeter/Submillimeter Array (ALMA), the upgrade of the Very Large Array to the Jansky Very Large Array was being planned, and millimeter instrumentation was being introduced on the Green Bank Telescope (GBT). CARMA had just commenced its first semester of routine science and would shortly populate its more extended arrays, enabling high resolution observations, particularly well adapted to maser observations. The Submillimeter Array was forging new paths with high resolution observations up to the edge of the atmospheric windows near 700 GHz.
    [Show full text]
  • Pesticide Effects on Beneficial Insects and Mites in Vegetables
    Pesticide Effects on Beneficial Insects and Mites in Vegetables Dr Paul Horne IPM Technologies Pty Ltd Project Number: VG06087 VG06087 This report is published by Horticulture Australia Ltd to pass on information concerning horticultural research and development undertaken for the vegetable industry. The research contained in this report was funded by Horticulture Australia Ltd with the financial support of the vegetable industry. All expressions of opinion are not to be regarded as expressing the opinion of Horticulture Australia Ltd or any authority of the Australian Government. The Company and the Australian Government accept no responsibility for any of the opinions or the accuracy of the information contained in this report and readers should rely upon their own enquiries in making decisions concerning their own interests. ISBN 0 7341 2012 5 Published and distributed by: Horticulture Australia Ltd Level 7 179 Elizabeth Street Sydney NSW 2000 Telephone: (02) 8295 2300 Fax: (02) 8295 2399 © Copyright 2009 HAL Project Number: VG06087 (29 May 2009) Project Title: Pesticide Effects on Beneficial Insects and Mites in Vegetables Authors: Paul Horne, Peter Cole & Anna Cutler Research Provider: IPM Technologies Pty Ltd HAL Project Number: VG06087 Project Leader: Dr Paul Horne IPM Technologies Pty Ltd PO Box 560 Hurstbridge 3099 Victoria, Australia Ph: 03 9710 1554 Email: [email protected] Personnel: Mr Peter Cole, IPM Technologies Pty Ltd Dr Anna Cutler, IPM Technologies Pty Ltd Dr Amanda Kobelt, Department of Primary Industries, Victoria Ms Sarita Kulkarni, Department of Primary Industries, Victoria Ms Kate Lorey, IPM Technologies Pty Ltd This report describes the acute and long-term impacts that pesticide applications have on beneficial insects and mites so that pesticide compatibility with biological control in IPM programs can be improved.
    [Show full text]
  • Occasional Papers
    NUMBER 120, 17 pages 25 May 2017 BISHOP MUSEUM OCCASIONAL PAPERS THE SPIDERS OF RAPA NUI (E ASTER ISLAND ) R EVISITED DARKO D. C OTORAS , J. J UDSON WYNNE , LUIS FLORES -P RADO & C RISTIAN VILLAGRA BISHOP MUSEUM PRESS HONOLULU Cover image: The potentially endemic and undescribed Tetragnatha sp., believed restricted to the totora reeds lin - ing the shores of Rano Raraku crater lake. Photo: Darko Cortoras. Bishop Museum Press has been publishing scholarly books on the natu - ESEARCH ral and cultural history of Hawai‘i and the Pacific since 1892. The R Bishop Museum Occasional Papers (eISSN 2376-3191) is a series of short papers describing original research in the natural and cultural sci - PUBLICATIONS OF ences. BISHOP MUSEUM The Bishop Museum Press also publishes the Bishop Museum Bulletin series. It was begun in 1922 as a series of monographs presenting the results of research throughout the Pacific in many scientific fields. In 1987, the Bulletin series was separated into the Museum’s five current monographic series, issued irregularly and, since 2017, electronically: Bishop Museum Bulletins in Anthropology (eISSN 2376-3132) Bishop Museum Bulletins in Botany (eISSN 2376-3078) Bishop Museum Bulletins in Entomology (eISSN 2376-3124) Bishop Museum Bulletins in Zoology (eISSN 2376-3213) Bishop Museum Bulletins in Cultural and Environmental Studies (eISSN 2376-3159) To subscribe to any of the above series, or to purchase individual publi - cations, please write to: Bishop Museum Press, 1525 Bernice Street, Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817-2704, USA. Phone: (808) 848-4135. Email: [email protected]. BERNICE PAUAHI BISHOP MUSEUM ISSN 0893-1348 (print) The State Museum of Natural and Cultural History ISSN 2376-3191 (online) 1525 Bernice Street Copyright © by Bishop Museum Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817-2704, USA Published online: 25 May 2017 ISSN (online): 2376-3191 Spiders of Rapa Nui (Easter Island) Revisted .
    [Show full text]
  • The Coccinellids (Coleoptera:Coccinellidae) Fauna in Manduwala Region, Dehradun, India
    J. Exp. Zool. India Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 177-183, 2018 www.connectjournals.com/jez ISSN 0972-0030 THE COCCINELLIDS (COLEOPTERA:COCCINELLIDAE) FAUNA IN MANDUWALA REGION, DEHRADUN, INDIA Dinesh Kumar Bhardwaj and Jyoti Falswal Department of Zoology, Dolphin (P.G.) Institute of Biomedical and Natural Sciences, Dehradun, India. (Accepted 17 October 2017) ABSTRACT : The latitude of Manduwala in Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India is 30.321915, and the longitude is 78.026619. Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India is located at India Country. These beetles are useful because of their predaceous Nature. The specimens of this research were collected by hand picking. These are of small size and easy to capture by hand. Killing Jar is a device used by entomologists to kill captured insects quickly and with minimum damage. The Jar, typically glass, must be hermetically sealable and one design has a thin layer of hardened plaster of paris on the bottom to absorb the killing agent. The killing agent will then slowly evaporate, allowing the jar to be used many times before needing to refresh the jar. A second method utilizes a wad of cotton placed in the bottom of jar. Liquid killing agent is then added until the absorbent material is nearly saturated. The most common killing agent is Chloroform and ethyl acetate. The species belong the family Coccinellidae; Sub family- Coccinellinae, the total of 9 species, Coccinella quinquepunctata, Coccinella hieroglyphica, Coccinella transversalis, Harmonia dimidiata, Coccinella leonine, Harmonia conformis, Coccinella septempunctata, Hippodamia veriegata, Halmus chalybeus was identified. Coccinellids are the most important and powerful predators of hemipteran pests including, aphids, mealybugs, scale insects and whiteflies.
    [Show full text]
  • Metacommunities and Biodiversity Patterns in Mediterranean Temporary Ponds: the Role of Pond Size, Network Connectivity and Dispersal Mode
    METACOMMUNITIES AND BIODIVERSITY PATTERNS IN MEDITERRANEAN TEMPORARY PONDS: THE ROLE OF POND SIZE, NETWORK CONNECTIVITY AND DISPERSAL MODE Irene Tornero Pinilla Per citar o enllaçar aquest document: Para citar o enlazar este documento: Use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://www.tdx.cat/handle/10803/670096 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.ca Aquesta obra està subjecta a una llicència Creative Commons Reconeixement- NoComercial Esta obra está bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial licence DOCTORAL THESIS Metacommunities and biodiversity patterns in Mediterranean temporary ponds: the role of pond size, network connectivity and dispersal mode Irene Tornero Pinilla 2020 DOCTORAL THESIS Metacommunities and biodiversity patterns in Mediterranean temporary ponds: the role of pond size, network connectivity and dispersal mode IRENE TORNERO PINILLA 2020 DOCTORAL PROGRAMME IN WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY SUPERVISED BY DR DANI BOIX MASAFRET DR STÉPHANIE GASCÓN GARCIA Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements to obtain the Degree of Doctor at the University of Girona Dr Dani Boix Masafret and Dr Stéphanie Gascón Garcia, from the University of Girona, DECLARE: That the thesis entitled Metacommunities and biodiversity patterns in Mediterranean temporary ponds: the role of pond size, network connectivity and dispersal mode submitted by Irene Tornero Pinilla to obtain a doctoral degree has been completed under our supervision. In witness thereof, we hereby sign this document. Dr Dani Boix Masafret Dr Stéphanie Gascón Garcia Girona, 22nd November 2019 A mi familia Caminante, son tus huellas el camino y nada más; Caminante, no hay camino, se hace camino al andar.
    [Show full text]
  • March 21–25, 2016
    FORTY-SEVENTH LUNAR AND PLANETARY SCIENCE CONFERENCE PROGRAM OF TECHNICAL SESSIONS MARCH 21–25, 2016 The Woodlands Waterway Marriott Hotel and Convention Center The Woodlands, Texas INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT Universities Space Research Association Lunar and Planetary Institute National Aeronautics and Space Administration CONFERENCE CO-CHAIRS Stephen Mackwell, Lunar and Planetary Institute Eileen Stansbery, NASA Johnson Space Center PROGRAM COMMITTEE CHAIRS David Draper, NASA Johnson Space Center Walter Kiefer, Lunar and Planetary Institute PROGRAM COMMITTEE P. Doug Archer, NASA Johnson Space Center Nicolas LeCorvec, Lunar and Planetary Institute Katherine Bermingham, University of Maryland Yo Matsubara, Smithsonian Institute Janice Bishop, SETI and NASA Ames Research Center Francis McCubbin, NASA Johnson Space Center Jeremy Boyce, University of California, Los Angeles Andrew Needham, Carnegie Institution of Washington Lisa Danielson, NASA Johnson Space Center Lan-Anh Nguyen, NASA Johnson Space Center Deepak Dhingra, University of Idaho Paul Niles, NASA Johnson Space Center Stephen Elardo, Carnegie Institution of Washington Dorothy Oehler, NASA Johnson Space Center Marc Fries, NASA Johnson Space Center D. Alex Patthoff, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Cyrena Goodrich, Lunar and Planetary Institute Elizabeth Rampe, Aerodyne Industries, Jacobs JETS at John Gruener, NASA Johnson Space Center NASA Johnson Space Center Justin Hagerty, U.S. Geological Survey Carol Raymond, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Lindsay Hays, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Paul Schenk,
    [Show full text]
  • Martian Subsurface Properties and Crater Formation Processes Inferred from Fresh Impact Crater Geometries
    Martian Subsurface Properties and Crater Formation Processes Inferred From Fresh Impact Crater Geometries The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Stewart, Sarah T., and Gregory J. Valiant. 2006. Martian subsurface properties and crater formation processes inferred from fresh impact crater geometries. Meteoritics and Planetary Sciences 41: 1509-1537. Published Version http://meteoritics.org/ Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:4727301 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Meteoritics & Planetary Science 41, Nr 10, 1509–1537 (2006) Abstract available online at http://meteoritics.org Martian subsurface properties and crater formation processes inferred from fresh impact crater geometries Sarah T. STEWART* and Gregory J. VALIANT Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, 20 Oxford Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] (Received 22 October 2005; revision accepted 30 June 2006) Abstract–The geometry of simple impact craters reflects the properties of the target materials, and the diverse range of fluidized morphologies observed in Martian ejecta blankets are controlled by the near-surface composition and the climate at the time of impact. Using the Mars Orbiter Laser Altimeter (MOLA) data set, quantitative information about the strength of the upper crust and the dynamics of Martian ejecta blankets may be derived from crater geometry measurements.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Inventory and Assessment Report, Fall 2018 Caltech Submillimeter Observatory, Maunakea, Hawai‘I
    Biological Inventory and Assessment Report, Fall 2018 Caltech Submillimeter Observatory, Maunakea, Hawai‘i Action BoardApril 2019 Prepared for: Sustainable Resources Group Intn’l, Inc. Prepared by: Matthew J Medeiros, PhD [email protected] mattjmedeiros.comFor All photographs in this report are copyrighted by Matthew J Medeiros. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Caltech Submillimeter Observatory Decommissioning ................................................................ 1 1.2 Physical Setting ............................................................................................................................. 1 2 METHODS ........................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Permit and Personnel .................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Schedule ........................................................................................................................................ 3 2.3 Nomenclature ................................................................................................................................ 3 2.4 Methodology for Inventorying Plants, Lichens, Non-arthropod Animals, and Abiotic Features . 3 2.4.1 Transects: Floral and Abiotic Features ................................................................................
    [Show full text]