Cadre Integre De Classification De La
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
August – October 2017 – Projected Situation: November to March 2018 REPOBLIKAN’I MADAGASIKARA
INTEGRATED FOOD SECURITY CLASSIFICATION Current situation: August – October 2017 – Projected situation: November to March 2018 REPOBLIKAN’I MADAGASIKARA IPC analysis carried out from 9 to 15 October 2017 for the South and the South East of Madagascar KEY OUTPUTS OF FOOD INSECURITY FROM AUGUST TO OCTOBER 2017 % POPULATION NEEDING EMERGENCY ACTION (PHASE 3 & 4 OF The most affected areas: IPC) Districts in emergency without humanitarian assistance (IPC Phase 3 !): AMBOASARY SUD and Percentage1 of household and number of people who need emergency the four communes in the district of Taolagnaro (Ranopiso, Analapatsy, Andranobory, action to proctect their livelihood and reduce food shortage from August Ankariera) to October 2017, in the areas affected by natural disaster (drought/flood) Districts in crisis (IPC Phase 3): VANGAINDRANO, FARAFANGANA, TULEAR II – (Commune of in the districts of the South and South East of Madagascar and compared Beheloka/Efoetse), AMPANIHY, BETIOKY, AMBOVOMBE, BELOHA, BEKILY, TSIHOMBE to the situation from March to May 2017. Districts in stressed (IPC Phase 2) : VOHIPENO and MANAKARA. For all the analyzed geographical area, 9% of the population (approximately 261 388 persons) are in emergency phase (IPC phase 4) and 34% of the population (approximately 1 027 783 persons) is classified in crisis phase (IPC phase 3). Food consumption: In the South East, the District of Farafangana records a high proportion of households having a poor FCS (Food Consumption Score) (20,1%) ; the other districts have a rate ranging from 3 and 7,8%. With regard to the South, Ampanihy, Beloha, Tsihombe, the 4 Communes of Taolagnaro, Bekily, and Toliara II recorded an FCS exceding 20%. -
Cryptic Diversification of Two Widespread Species in Madagascar
Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Master's Theses Theses and Dissertations 2018 Cryptic Diversification of woT Widespread Species in Madagascar Lynika Sharlice Strozier Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Strozier, Lynika Sharlice, "Cryptic Diversification of woT Widespread Species in Madagascar" (2018). Master's Theses. 3708. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses/3708 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 2017 Lynika Sharlice Strozier LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO CRYPTC DIVERSIFICATION OF TWO WIDESPREAD SPECIES IN MADAGASCAR A DISSERTATION SUBMITTTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE PROGRAM IN BIOLOGY BY LYNIKA S. STROZIER CHICAGO, IL MAY 2018 Copyright by Lynika Strozier, 2018 All rights reserved. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank all those who made this thesis possible. First, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my advisor Dr. Reddy for her continued support throughout my studies. Without her support throughout this process I do not believe I would have made it this far and this defense would not have been possible. A very special thanks to Sarah Kurtis who assisted with the laboratory experiments and thesis edits. She was very supportive and encouraging throughout my studies. -
Résultats Détaillés Toliary
RESULTATS SENATORIALES DU 29/12/2015 FARITANY: 6 TOLIARY BV reçus: 304 sur 304 HVM IND OBAMA FITIBA AVOTS AREMA MAPAR IND IND TIM IND IND MONIM AJFO E OMBILA MIARA- MASOA TSIMAN A TANIND HY DIA NDRO AVAKE N°BV Emplacement AP AT Inscrits Votants B N S E RAZA MAHER Y REGION 61 ANDROY BV reçus 58 sur 58 DISTRICT: 6101 AMBOVOMBE ANDROY BV reçus21 sur 21 01 AMBANISARIKA 0 0 8 8 0 8 5 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 02 AMBAZOA 0 0 8 7 1 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 03 AMBOHIMALAZA 0 0 8 8 0 8 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 04 AMBONAIVO 0 0 8 8 0 8 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 05 AMBONDRO 0 0 8 7 0 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06 AMBOVOMBE ANDRO 1 0 12 12 2 10 7 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 07 AMPAMATA 1 0 8 8 1 7 5 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 08 ANALAMARY 0 0 6 6 1 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 09 ANDALATANOSY 0 0 8 7 0 7 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 ANDOHARANO 1 0 6 5 2 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 ANDRAGNANIVO 0 0 6 6 0 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 12 ANJEKY ANKILIKIRA 1 0 8 8 1 7 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 13 ANTANIMORA SUD 0 0 8 8 0 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 14 ERADA 0 0 8 8 1 7 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 15 IMANOMBO 0 0 8 8 0 8 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 16 JAFARO 0 0 8 8 0 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 17 MAROALOMAINTE 1 0 8 8 2 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 18 MAROALOPOTY 0 7 8 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 MAROVATO BEFENO 0 0 8 7 0 7 4 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 20 SIHANAMARO 0 0 8 8 0 8 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 21 TSIMANANADA 0 0 8 8 0 8 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 TOTAL DISTRICT 5 7 166 160 18 142 91 1 0 0 2 1 3 7 9 0 0 0 28 DISTRICT: 6102 BEKILY BV reçus20 sur -
DOWNLOAD 1 IPC Madagascar Acutefi
INTEGRATED FOOD SECURITY PHASE CLASSIFICATION Current situation: March-May 2017 Projected situation: June-September 2017 REPUBLIC OF MADAGASCAR IPC analysis conducted from 8 to 15 June for the Southern and South eastern of Madagascar KEY HIGHLIGHTS ON THE FOOD INSECURITY FROM MARCH TO MAY 2017 % POPULATION REQUIRING URGENT ACTION Percentage (1) of households and number of people requiring Districts in emergency phase despite humanitarian actions (IPC Phase 3 !): Betioky, urgent action to protect their livelihoods and reduce food Ampanihy, Tsihombe, Beloha, Amboasary Sud; four communes in the district of consumption gaps from March and April 2017, in the areas Taolagnaro (Ranopiso, Analapatsy, Andranobory, Ankariera) and the commune of affected by disasters (drought/floods) in the South and South Beheloka in Tuléar II eastern districts of Madagascar and in comparison with the Districts in crisis phase (IPC Phase 3): Vangaindrano, Farafanagana, Vohipeno situation in last 2016. Districts in crisis phase despite humanitarian actions (IPC Phase 2!): Ambovombe and Bekily. Evolution 2017 rate march to (base 100 In total, 9% of the population (about 262,800 people) are in emergency phase (IPC District 2016 may year 2016) MANAKARA 73 395 0 phase 4) and 27% (about 804,600 people) are classified in crisis phase (IPC phase 3). VOHIPENO 93 490 0 FARAFANGANA 152 575 0 Food consumption: In the South eastern regions of the country, about 18% of VANGAINDRANO 165 497 0 South eastern 484 957 0% households have a poor food consumption score against 33% in the South. Vohipeno, BETIOKY+TULEAR II 76 751 132 761 173,0% AMPANIHY 168 000 103 528 61,6% Tsihombe districts and the commune of Beheloka (Tuléar II) have critical food BELOHA 88 856 54 752 61,6% consumption score, above 40%. -
La Domination Des Entites Du Systeme Financier Mondial Des
Arts lettres et scienceshumaines Mention géographie Parcours géographie et économie Mémoire pour l’obtention du diplôme de MasterII LES ENJEUX ET LES VRAIS BENEFICIAIRES DU SYSTEME DE FINANCEMENT DU DEVELOPPEMENT DE LA BANQUE MONDIALE: CAS POLES INTEGRES DE CROISSANCE REGION ANOSY Présenté par : Antoine Jonhson RAZANAKOTO Encadreur : Madame RAHARINJANAHARY Rindra Maître de Conférences Date de soutenance : 31 Mars 2017 REMERCIEMENTS Au terme de ce mémoire, rendons grâce au créateur tout puissant qui nous a béni dans tous ce que nous avons entrepris, le moral ayant été inhérent dans l’accomplissement de notre tâche. Par ailleurs, ce présent mémoire est aussi le fruit de la collaboration et du soutien de nombreuses personnes. Ainsi donc, nous adressons aussi nos vifs et sincères remerciements à tous ceux qui ont contribué à la réalisation de ce mémoire et particulièrement Madame RAHARINJANAHARY Rindra directrice de la mention géographie, mon encadreur, et aussi à tous mes ami(e)s qui ont contribué à la réalisation de ce mémoire. i SOMMAIRE REMERCIEMENTS ................................................................................................................... i SOMMAIRE .............................................................................................................................. ii LISTE DES ACRONYMES ..................................................................................................... iii LISTE DES TABLEAUX ........................................................................................................ -
Evolution De La Couverture De Forets Naturelles a Madagascar
EVOLUTION DE LA COUVERTURE DE FORETS NATURELLES A MADAGASCAR 1990-2000-2005 mars 2009 La publication de ce document a été rendue possible grâce à un support financier du Peuple Americain à travers l’USAID (United States Agency for International Development). L’analyse de la déforestation pour les années 1990 et 2000 a été fournie par Conservation International. MINISTERE DE L’ENVIRONNEMENT, DES FORETS ET DU TOURISME Le présent document est un rapport du Ministère de l’Environnement, des Forêts et du Tourisme (MEFT) sur l’état de de l’évolution de la couverture forestière naturelle à Madagascar entre 1990, 2000, et 2005. Ce rapport a été préparé par Conservation International. Par ailleurs, les personnes suivantes (par ordre alphabétique) ont apporté leur aimable contribution pour sa rédaction: Andrew Keck, James MacKinnon, Norotiana Mananjean, Sahondra Rajoelina, Pierrot Rakotoniaina, Solofo Ralaimihoatra, Bruno Ramamonjisoa, Balisama Ramaroson, Andoniaina Rambeloson, Rija Ranaivosoa, Pierre Randriamantsoa, Andriambolantsoa Rasolohery, Minoniaina L. Razafindramanga et Marc Steininger. Le traitement des imageries satellitaires a été réalisé par Balisama Ramaroson, Minoniaina L. Razafindramanga, Pierre Randriamantsoa et Rija Ranaivosoa et les cartes ont été réalisées par Andriambolantsoa Rasolohery. La réalisation de ce travail a été rendu possible grâce a une aide financière de l’United States Agency for International Development (USAID) et mobilisé à travers le projet JariAla. En effet, ce projet géré par International Resources Group (IRG) fournit des appuis stratégiques et techniques au MEFT dans la gestion du secteur forestier. Ce rapport devra être cité comme : MEFT, USAID et CI, 2009. Evolution de la couverture de forêts naturelles à Madagascar, 1990- 2000-2005. -
Exploring Ecosystem Valuation to Move Towards Net Positive Impact on Biodiversity in the Mining Sector
Exploring ecosystem valuation to move towards net positive impact on biodiversity in the mining sector Nathalie Olsen, Joshua Bishop and Stuart Anstee IUCN and Rio Tinto Technical Series No.1 Exploring ecosystem valuation to move towards net positive impact on biodiversity in the mining sector Nathalie Olsen, Joshua Bishop and Stuart Anstee IUCN and Rio Tinto Technical Series No.1 ISBN: 978-2-8317-1379-3 Cover photo: © Ravoahangy Andriamandranto Layout by: The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the millerdesign.co.uk material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN or Rio Tinto concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or Printed by: of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. SRO-Kundig SA The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN Available from: or Rio Tinto. IUCN (International Union for Published by: IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Rio Tinto, London, UK Conservation of Nature) Copyright: © 2011 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Publications Services Resources Rue Mauverney 28 1196 Gland Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial Switzerland purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Tel +41 22 999 0000 Fax +41 22 999 0020 Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is [email protected] prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. www.iucn.org/publications Citation: Olsen, Nathalie, Bishop, Joshua and Anstee, Stuart (2011). -
Profil Environnemental : Région Anosy
ONE/MO/DOC/31/ANO - ANALYSE DIAGNOSTIC ENVIRONNEMENTALE - ENJEUX ENVIRONNEMENTAUX ET INDICATEURS 2006 ONE/MO/DOC/31/ANO 1 Région Anosy Décembre 2005 ONE/MO/DOC/31/ANO 3 S O M M A I R E S O M M A I R E .................................................................................................................................................... 3 LISTE DES TABLEAUX....................................................................................................................................... 5 LISTE DES CARTES............................................................................................................................................. 5 LISTE DES ABREVIATIONS............................................................................................................................... 6 I- INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................................ 8 I.1- CONTEXTE DU DOCUMENT .................................................................................................................... 8 I.2- RAPPELS DES TERMES DE REFERENCE................................................................................................ 8 I.3- LES OBJECTIFS......................................................................................................................................... 8 I.4- LA METHODOLOGIE PRECONISEE......................................................................................................... 8 I.5- -
Bulletin D'information Du Cluster Nutrition Resultats De La Surveillance
© UNICEF/UNI209764/Ralaivita BULLETIN D’INFORMATION DU CLUSTER NUTRITION RESULTATS DE LA SURVEILLANCE NUTRITIONNELLE DANS DIX DISTRICTS DU SUD DE MADAGASCAR TROISIEME TRIMESTRE 2020 © UNICEF/UN0280943/Rakotobe BULLETIN D’INFORMATION DU CLUSTER NUTRITION RESULTATS DE LA SURVEILLANCE NUTRITIONNELLE DANS HUIT DISTRICTTS DU SUD DE MADAGASCAR | PAGE 2 I. APERÇU DE LA SITUATION NUTRITIONNELLE Au cours du troisième trimestre 2020, dix districts du sud de Madagascar ont bénéficié des dépistages exhaustifs de la malnutrition aiguë. Cette activité a été mise en œuvre par les services déconcentrés du Gouvernement de Madagascar (Office National de Nutrition et Ministère de la Santé Publique) avec l’appui technique et financier de l’UNICEF. Sur l’ensemble des dix districts, 436.388 enfants ont été dépistés sur un total de 447.178 enfants âgés de 6 à 59 mois attendus (soit 98%). L’analyse des résultats révèle une : • Urgence nutritionnelle dans 13% des communes (26 communes sur 202) • Alerte nutritionnelle dans 14% des communes (29 communes sur 202) • Situation nutritionnelle « sous contrôle » dans 73% des communes (147 communes sur 202) © UNICEF/UNI209771/Ralaivita En 2018 et 2019, les districts de Tuléar 2 et Betroka ne faisaient pas partie des zones couvertes par le Système de Surveillance Nutritionnelle (SSN). Ainsi, en excluant ces deux districts (afin de rendre la comparaison avec ces périodes possible), les résultats du dépistage du T3 2020 montrent que la situation nutritionnelle dans les communes des huit districts n’a pas vraiment changé par rapport à T3-2019 (14% en Urgence, 15% en Alerte et 71% « sous contrôle » dans 154 communes). Il en est de même par rapport à la situation du T3 2018. -
Conservation Management and Ecological Monitoring In
CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT AND ECOLOGICAL MONITORING IN MADAGASCAR’S PROTECTED AREAS Status report, October 2002 PNM Conservation management planning status report, page 1 CONTEXT Protected area management standards In the year 2000, Madagascar’s protected area service (Parcs Nationaux de Madagascar, PNM) decided that adoption of internationally recognized management systems was to be major goal of the organization. This decision was linked directly to PNM’s agreement to adopt an evaluation system developed by the World Commission for Protected Areas (WCPA), a division of the World Conservation Union (IUCN.) The WCPA evaluation system is promoted throughout the world as a means to compare the management efficiency of different protected area networks. The WCPA is in the process of establishing guidelines and norms for different aspects of protected area management. One of the first to appear was that concerned with national protected area system planning. This was presented in 2000 and, happily, PNM’s national system plan conforms closely to the WCPA recommendations. In parallel, the WCPA continued to develop guidelines and norms for conservation management, including ecological monitoring. Several models have been developed for conservation monitoring and evaluation, but there are few that specifically treat planning or implementation. However, some of the monitoring/evaluation models do require a considerable level of analysis and subsequent planning as part of their methodology. Monitoring and evaluation Ecological monitoring and evaluation of conservation success is notoriously difficult in many PA systems, and has been a constant challenge for PNM. Monitoring and evaluation are critical factors in conservation management, and any attempts to improve the effectiveness of the latter must be based on sound assessment systems. -
Oral Testimony of the Antanosy People
VOICES OF CHANGE MADAGASCAR VOICES OF CHANGE Oral testimony of the Antanosy people © Editorial content Andrew Lees Trust & Panos London, 2009 Photography: ©Andrew Lees Trust, Antonie Kraemer All rights reserved THIS BOOK IS DEDICATED TO ANDREW LEES (1949 – 1994) HE FOUGHT FOR NATURE AND INSPIRED OTHERS TO PROTECT THEIR ENVIRONMENT 1 VOICES OF CHANGE Our greatest thanks go to all the villagers who gave their time so generously, and had the courage to share their life stories and experiences. Much credit must also be given to the village interviewers who recorded their testimonies: Rodin Rakotovahiny, Joséphine Andriarimalala, Zanaboatsy, Monja Limbisoa, Félicia Mija, Brinaldine Razafiarivelo, Bruno Mbola, Laha Magnanatsy. We are grateful to the regional and local authorities who permitted us to work in the communes and Fokontany, and for their ongoing support of our work and presence in southern Madagascar. This publication could not have been achieved without the training, editorial and production support of the Panos London team, including Keren Ghitis, Siobhan Warrington, Olivia Bennett and Wendy Davies; and also the project management, Acknowledgements field implementation, and publication work by the Andrew Lees Trust team, including: Yvonne Orengo, Claire Balbo, Loubien Ndriaka, Alda Nomenjanahary, Andriamanalina Razafindramaka, Charlotte Razafindramanana, Claudia Rakotovoavy, Gerry de Lisle and Hamed Moindjee. We deeply appreciate the time and resources given by volunteers, in particular by Antonie Kraemer, and also Amy Glass and Lucinda Broad; and we are also indebted to the French/Malagasy translators of the book: Junassye Rabemazaka, Kate Anderson, Rockalain Fanomezantsoa, Ny Haja Rakotozandriny; a big thank you also to Ny Haja Rakotozandriny and Alan Hunns for the design and layout, and to J Moat and P Smith P of the Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, for the Atlas of the vegetation of Madagascar (2007). -
Transfert De Subvention Par FDL Aux Communes : Réalisation 2017 Et Prévision 2018
2018 Transfert de subvention par FDL aux communes : Réalisation 2017 et prévision 2018 Fonds de Développement Local Rue, Pierre Stibbe Anosy Antananarivo. e-mail: [email protected] Tel: 0 34 05 522 75 Tel: 0 33 37 690 99 www.fdl.mg Page 1 23/04/2018 Sommaire RECAPITULATION DES TRANSFERTS ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Récapitulation des transferts réalisation 2017 et prévision 2018 ...................................................................................................................................................... 4 REALISATION DE TRANSFERT DE SUBVENTION DES COMMUNES POUR 2017 ..................................................................................................................... 5 Ressource Propre Interne (RPI)......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Fonds National de Péréquation (FNP) ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 8 Programme de Développement Communal Inclusif et de Décentralisation (PDCID) : Phase d'études : Conventions, APS, APD, Appels d'offres .................... 9 Projet d'Appui à la Réforme de la Sécurisation Foncière (ARSF) ................................................................................................................................................