Toondah Harbour PDA
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Development Assessment Report
Development Assessment Report Toondah Harbour Priority Development Area (THPDA) Proposed interim use - car park 233 Middle Street Cleveland 14 February 2018 1 Executive Summary Redland City Council (RCC) are seeking approval for an Interim Land Use (car park) to cater for overflow parking for visitors going to North Stradbroke Island during peak holiday periods and/or festivals/events. Previously RCC have utilised two grassed areas located at 233 Middle Street Cleveland, more specifically Lot 19 on SP115544, for overflow parking which prior to the area being included in the THPDA was self-assessable development as a temporary use under the Redlands Planning Scheme. The area used would be approximately 2000m2 in ‘Area 1’ and 1400m2 in ‘Area 2’ and the number of car parks would not exceed 100 and 60 respectively. Area 1 adjoins residential development and a buffer zone is included in addition to the existing 5m wide public walkway that runs between the boundaries to negate any potential adverse amenity impacts. Area 1 and 2 are located in Precinct 2 – Residential of the THPDA Development Scheme. The proposed development necessitates a development application for Material Change of Use – Interim Land Use (car park). RCC understands that notification of this application may not be required. Having regard to the THPDA Development Scheme, current market conditions, and other external influences it is RCC’s view that the use of the site for the proposed Interim Land Use (car park) use is an appropriate use of the site. The use is a continuation of a previous temporary use that did not require development works or approval. -
Citizens & Reef Science
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Report Editor: Jennifer Loder Report Authors and Contributors: Jennifer Loder, Terry Done, Alex Lea, Annie Bauer, Jodi Salmond, Jos Hill, Lionel Galway, Eva Kovacs, Jo Roberts, Melissa Walker, Shannon Mooney, Alena Pribyl, Marie-Lise Schläppy Science Advisory Team: Dr. Terry Done, Dr. Chris Roelfsema, Dr. Gregor Hodgson, Dr. Marie-Lise Schläppy, Jos Hill Graphic Designers: Manu Taboada, Tyler Hood, Alex Levonis This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence visit: http:// This project is supported by Reef Check creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Australia, through funding from the Australian Government. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to: Reef Check Foundation Ltd, PO Box 13204 George St Brisbane QLD 4003, Project achievements have been made [email protected] possible by a countless number of dedicated volunteers, collaborators, funders, advisors and industry champions. Citation: Thanks from us and our oceans. Volunteers, Staff and Supporters of Reef Check Australia (2015). Authors J. Loder, T. Done, A. Lea, A. Bauer, J. Salmond, J. Hill, L. Galway, E. Kovacs, J. Roberts, M. Walker, S. Mooney, A. Pribyl, M.L. Schläppy. Citizens & Reef Science: A Celebration of Reef Check Australia’s volunteer reef monitoring, education and conservation programs 2001- 2014. Reef Check Foundation Ltd. Cover photo credit: Undersea Explorer, GBR Photo by Matt Curnock (Russell Island, GBR) 3 Key messages FROM REEF CHECK AUSTRALIA 2001-2014 WELCOME AND THANKS • Reef monitoring is critical to understand • Across most RCA sites there was both human and natural impacts, as well evidence of reef health impacts. -
Report on the Administration of the Nature Conservation Act 1992 (Reporting Period 1 July 2019 to 30 June 2020)
Report on the administration of the Nature Conservation Act 1992 (reporting period 1 July 2019 to 30 June 2020) Prepared by: Department of Environment and Science © State of Queensland, 2020. The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia (CC BY) licence. Under this licence you are free, without having to seek our permission, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. For more information on this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en Disclaimer This document has been prepared with all due diligence and care, based on the best available information at the time of publication. The department holds no responsibility for any errors or omissions within this document. Any decisions made by other parties based on this document are solely the responsibility of those parties. If you need to access this document in a language other than English, please call the Translating and Interpreting Service (TIS National) on 131 450 and ask them to telephone Library Services on +61 7 3170 5470. This publication can be made available in an alternative format (e.g. large print or audiotape) on request for people with vision impairment; phone +61 7 3170 5470 or email <[email protected]>. September 2020 Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Nature Conservation Act 1992—departmental administrative responsibilities ............................................................. 1 List of legislation and subordinate legislation .............................................................................................................. -
2014 Update of the SEQ NRM Plan: Redlands
Item: Redlands Draft LG Report Date: Last updated 11th November 2014 2014 Update of the SEQ NRM Plan: Redlands How can the SEQ NRM Plan support the Community’s Vision for the future of Redlands? Supporting Document no. 7 for the 2014 Update of the SEQ Natural Resource Management Plan. Note regards State Government Planning Policy: The Queensland Government is currently undertaking a review of the SEQ Regional Plan 2009. Whilst this review has yet to be finalised, the government has made it clear that the “new generation” statutory regional plans focus on the particular State Planning Policy issues that require a regionally-specific policy direction for each region. This quite focused approach to statutory regional plans compares to the broader content in previous (and the current) SEQ Regional Plan. The SEQ Natural Resource Management Plan has therefore been prepared to be consistent with the State Planning Policy. Disclaimer: This information or data is provided by SEQ Catchments Limited on behalf of the Project Reference Group for the 2014 Update of the SEQ NRM Plan. You should seek specific or appropriate advice in relation to this information or data before taking any action based on its contents. So far as permitted by law, SEQ Catchments Limited makes no warranty in relation to this information or data. ii Table of Contents Redlands, Bay and Islands ....................................................................................................................... 1 Part A - Achieving the community’s visions for Redlands .................................................................... 1 Queensland Plan – South East Queensland Themes .......................................................................... 1 Regional Development Australia - Logan and Redlands ..................................................................... 1 Services needed from natural assets to achieve these Visions .......................................................... 2 Natural Assets depend on the biodiversity of the Redlands. -
Submission Re Proposed Cooloola World Heritage Area Boundary
Nearshore Marine Biodiversity of the Sunshine Coast, South-East Queensland: Inventory of molluscs, corals and fishes July 2010 Photo courtesy Ian Banks Baseline Survey Report to the Noosa Integrated Catchment Association, September 2010 Lyndon DeVantier, David Williamson and Richard Willan Executive Summary Nearshore reef-associated fauna were surveyed at 14 sites at seven locations on the Sunshine Coast in July 2010. The sites were located offshore from Noosa in the north to Caloundra in the south. The species composition and abundance of corals and fishes and ecological condition of the sites were recorded using standard methods of rapid ecological assessment. A comprehensive list of molluscs was compiled from personal observations, the published literature, verifiable unpublished reports, and photographs. Photographic records of other conspicuous macro-fauna, including turtles, sponges, echinoderms and crustaceans, were also made anecdotally. The results of the survey are briefly summarized below. 1. Totals of 105 species of reef-building corals, 222 species of fish and 835 species of molluscs were compiled. Thirty-nine genera of soft corals, sea fans, anemones and corallimorpharians were also recorded. An additional 17 reef- building coral species have been reported from the Sunshine Coast in previous publications and one additional species was identified from a photo collection. 2. Of the 835 mollusc species listed, 710 species could be assigned specific names. Some of those not assigned specific status are new to science, not yet formally described. 3. Almost 10 % (81 species) of the molluscan fauna are considered endemic to the broader bioregion, their known distribution ranges restricted to the temperate/tropical overlap section of the eastern Australian coast (Central Eastern Shelf Transition). -
Benthic Inventory of Reefal Areas of Inshore Moreton Bay, Queensland, Australia
Benthic Inventory of Reefal Areas of Inshore Moreton Bay, Queensland, Australia By: Chris Roelfsema1,2, Jennifer Loder2, Rachel Host2, and Eva Kovacs1,2 1) Remote Sensing Research Centre (RSRC), School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, AUSTRALIA, 4072 2) Reef Check Australia, 9/10 Thomas St West End Queensland, AUSTRALIA 4101 January 2017 This project is supported by Reef Check Australia, Healthy Waterways and Catchments and The University of Queensland’s Remote Sensing Research Centre through funding from the Australian Government’s National Landcare Programme, Port of Brisbane Community Grant Program and Redland City Council. We would like to thank the staff and volunteers who supported this project, including: Nathan Caromel, Amanda Delaforce, John Doughty, Phil Dunbavan, Terry Farr, Sharon Ferguson, Stefano Freguia, Rachel Host, Tony Isaacson, Eva Kovacs, Jody Kreuger, Angela Little, Santiago Mejia, Rebekka Pentti, Alena Pribyl, Jodi Salmond, Julie Schubert, Douglas Stetner, Megan Walsh. A note of appreciation to the Moreton Bay Research Station and Moreton Bay Environmental Education Centre for their support in fieldwork logistics, and, to Satellite Application Centre for Surveying and Mapping (SASMAC) for providing the ZY-3 imagery. Project activities were conducted on the traditional lands of the Quandamooka People. We acknowledge the Traditional Custodians of the land, of Elders past and present. They are the Nughi of Moorgumpin (Moreton Island), and the Nunukul and Gorenpul of Minjerribah. Report should be cited as: C. Roelfsema, J. Loder, R. Host and E. Kovacs (2017). Benthic Inventory of Reefal Areas of Inshore Moreton Bay, Queensland, Australia, Brisbane. Remote Sensing Research Centre, School of Geography, Environmental Management and Planning, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; and Reef Check Australia, Brisbane, Australia. -
Assessment of Potential Impacts on the Ecological Character of the Moreton Bay Ramsar Wetland from the Toondah Harbour Project
Attachment 3 - Assessment of Potential Impacts on the Ecological Character of the Moreton Bay Ramsar Wetland from the Toondah Harbour Project Introduction It is recognised that the proposed Toondah Harbour development has the potential to have a significant impact on the Moreton Bay Ramsar Wetland and is therefore referred as a controlled action warranting further assessment under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act). To assist proponents determine if their proposed action is likely to have a significant impact on matters of national environmental significance (MNES), the Commonwealth Government produced a series of guidelines on significant impacts. Most relevant for Ramsar wetlands are the Significant Impact Guidelines 1.1 Matters of National Environmental Significance (CoA 2013). These guidelines state that: A ‘significant impact’ is an impact which is important, notable, or of consequence, having regard to its context or intensity. Whether or not an action is likely to have a significant impact depends upon the sensitivity, value, and quality of the environment which is impacted, and upon the intensity, duration, magnitude and geographic extent of the impacts. You should consider all of these factors when determining whether an action is likely to have a significant impact on matters of national environmental significance. The guidelines goes on to identify specific significant impact criteria for each MNES. An action is likely to have a significant impact on the ecological character of a declared Ramsar wetland if there is a real chance or possibility that it will result in: . areas of the wetland being destroyed or substantially modified; . a substantial and measurable change in the hydrological regime of the wetland, for example, a substantial change to the volume, timing, duration and frequency of ground and surface water flows to and within the wetland; . -
Brisbane Publishing Date: 2008-03-06 | Country Code: Au 1
ADVERTISING AREA REACH THE TRAVELLER! BRISBANE PUBLISHING DATE: 2008-03-06 | COUNTRY CODE: AU 1. DURING PLANNING 2. DURING PREPARATION Contents: The City, Do & See, Eating, Cafés, Bars & Nightlife, Shopping, Sleeping, Essential Information 3. DURING THE TRIP Advertise under these headings: The City, Do & See, Cafés, Eating, Bars & Nightlife, Shopping, Sleeping, Essential Information, maps Copyright © 2007 Fastcheck AB. All rights reserved. For more information visit: www.arrivalguides.com SPACE Do you want to reach this audience? Contact Fastcheck FOR E-mail: [email protected] RENT Tel: +46 31 711 03 90 Population: 1,735,181 Currency: $1 Australian Dollar (AUD) = 100 cents Opening hours: Opening hours for shops in Brisbane vary but in the city retailers trade 9am-5:30pm Monday to Saturday and 10am-4:30 on Sunday. Internet: www.visitbrisbane.com.au www.discoverbrisbane.com www.ourbrisbane.com Newspapers: The Courier Mail The Australian The Weekend Australian Sunday Mail Quest Newspapers Emergency numbers: Police, fire, ambulance: 000 Poisons Information: +61 (0)7 13 11 26 Qualified health advice: +61 (0)7 13 43 25 84 Tourist information: BRISBANE Visitor Information Centre Address: Queen Street Mall, CBD Brisbane is a lively, cosmopolitan city with excellent Opening times: Mon - Sat 9am-5:30pm. restaurants, beautiful riverside parks, a busy cultural Sunday 9:30am-4:30pm Tel: +61 (0)7 3006 6290 calendar and a great nightlife. Its fantasticweather year-round has allowed outdoor activities to thrive and Brisbane has developed a vibrant cafe culture. The city is surrounded by some of the state’s major tourist attractions, and there is an abundant choice of daytrips whether it be to the coast to the golden beaches, or inland to see some of Queensland’s serene bushland, there is something for everybody. -
2014 Update of the SEQ NRM Plan: Moreton Bay Region Incorporating Pumicestone and Pine Catchments
Item: 2014 Update of the SEQ NRM Plan – Moreton Bay Region Date: Last updated 11 November 2014 2014 Update of the SEQ NRM Plan: Moreton Bay Region incorporating Pumicestone and Pine Catchments How can the SEQ NRM Plan support the Community’s Vision? Supporting Document 7 for the 2014 Update of the SEQ Natural Resource Management Plan Note regards State Government Planning Policy: The Queensland Government is currently undertaking a review of the SEQ Regional Plan 2009. Whilst this review has yet to be finalised, the government has made it clear that the “new generation” statutory regional plans focus on the particular State Planning Policy issues that require a regionally-specific policy direction for each region. This quite focused approach to statutory regional plans compares to the broader content in previous (and the current) SEQ Regional Plan. The SEQ Natural Resource Management Plan has therefore been prepared to be consistent with the State Planning Policy. Disclaimer: This information or data is provided by SEQ Catchments Limited on behalf of the Project Reference Group for the 2014 Update of the SEQ NRM Plan. You should seek specific or appropriate advice in relation to this information or data before taking any action based on its contents. So far as permitted by law, SEQ Catchments Limited makes no warranty in relation to this information or data. ii Table of Contents Moreton Bay Regional Council – Pine and Pumicestone Catchments ....................................... 1 Part A: Achieving the Moreton Bay Regional Council Community’s Vision ........................ 1 Moreton Bay Strategic Framework ............................................................................................... 1 Queensland Plan – South East Queensland Goals ........................................................................ 2 Moreton Bay Regional Development Australia ........................................................................... -
Brisbane Regional Tourism Investment and Infrastructure Plan
83007 001 14/11/08 8:18 AM Page i Brisbane Regional Tourism Investment and Infrastructure Plan Incorporating: Brisbane City & Hinterland, Moreton Bay & Islands and Scenic Rim 83007 002-004 14/11/08 7:40 AM Page 2 DISCLAIMER – STATE GOVERNMENT DISCLAIMER – THESTAFFORDGROUP The Queensland Government makes no claim as to the accuracy of Any representation, statement, opinion or advice, expressed or the information contained in the Brisbane Regional Tourism Investment implied in this document is made in good faith but on the basis that and Infrastructure Plan. The document is not a prospectus and the TheStaffordGroup is not liable (whether by reason of negligence, lack information provided is general in nature. The document should not be of care or otherwise) to any person for any damage or loss whatsoever relied upon as the basis for financial and investment related decisions. which has occurred or may occur in relation to that person taking or not taking (as the case may be) action in respect of any representation, DISCLAIMER – BRISBANE MARKETING statement or advice referred to in this document. Brisbane Marketing makes no claim as to the accuracy of the information contained in the Brisbane Regional Tourism Investment and Infrastructure Plan. The document is not a prospectus and the information provided is general in nature. The document should not be relied upon as the basis for financial and investment related decisions. 83007 002-004 18/11/08 1:30 PM Page 1 Foreword Message from the Minister for Tourism, We look forward to watching the Brisbane tourism industry Regional Development and Industry, the grow under the plan, further contributing to our thriving state. -
Matters of NATIONAL Environmental Significance
AIRPOrt AND SURROUNds MATTERS OF NATIONAL EnVIROnmENTAL E2 SIGniFICANCE CONTENTS 1.6 Mitigation measures ......................................................433 1.7 Impact assessment summary ....................................435 Introduction to this Chapter ......................................................409 1.8 Conclusion .........................................................................435 SECTION 1: TERRESTRIAL FLORA SECTION 2: TERRESTRIAL FAUNA 1.1 Methodology and assumptions .................................. 410 2.1 Introduction .......................................................................436 1.1.1 Information and data collection ..........................410 2.2 Nomenclature and terminology ..................................436 1.1.1.1 Desktop studies .........................................410 1.1.1.2 Field surveys ................................................410 2.3 Methodology and assumptions ..................................436 1.1.1.3 Main survey ..................................................410 2.3.1 Desktop assessment and background sources ...............................................436 1.1.1.4 Supplementary spring surveys ...........413 2.3.2 Field survey overview ..............................................439 1.1.1.5 Vegetation mapping .................................413 2.3.3 Baseline terrestrial vertebrate survey ...............439 1.1.1.6 Assumptions and technical limitations ..................................413 2.3.3.1 Site selection (stratification) .................439 -
Submission To: Senate Environment and Communications References
Submission to: Senate Environment and Communications References Committee Inquiry into Environmental Offsets Marine and Coastal Ecological Communities with Reference to the Planned Toondah Harbour Marina Chris Walker Cleveland, Queensland 4 April 2014 Inquiry into Environmental Offsets Submission about Marine and Coastal Ecological Communities with Reference to the Planned Toondah Harbour Marina Introduction When actions associated with projects such as ports, canal estates and marinas are put forward for consideration under the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) it is important to understand how environmental offsets may apply. This submission focuses attention on environmental offsets for actions which have significant residual impacts on marine and/or coastal ecological communities. This is done with reference to a particular case. Planned Toondah Harbour Marina A marina up to 800 berths1 is planned for development at Cleveland on Brisbane’s southern bayside by the Redland City Council and the Queensland Government as part of the Toondah Harbour Priority Development Area (PDA).2 If such a marina project were to proceed it would impact on or destroy up to 50 hectares of marine and coastal ecological communities including mangroves, tidal mudflats and seagrass beds. The area for the planned marina is located in the Moreton Bay Marine Park Habitat Protection Zone.3 It is also part of the internationally significant Moreton Bay Ramsar site. 4 These habitats are protected because of their rich ecologies and because they support species which have conservation requirements. Figure 1 Area of Toondah Harbour PDA defined by Qld Govt Notable examples include the dugong, green turtle and loggerhead turtle which are all regarded as vulnerable or endangered.