2014 Update of the SEQ NRM Plan: Moreton Bay Region Incorporating Pumicestone and Pine Catchments

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2014 Update of the SEQ NRM Plan: Moreton Bay Region Incorporating Pumicestone and Pine Catchments Item: 2014 Update of the SEQ NRM Plan – Moreton Bay Region Date: Last updated 11 November 2014 2014 Update of the SEQ NRM Plan: Moreton Bay Region incorporating Pumicestone and Pine Catchments How can the SEQ NRM Plan support the Community’s Vision? Supporting Document 7 for the 2014 Update of the SEQ Natural Resource Management Plan Note regards State Government Planning Policy: The Queensland Government is currently undertaking a review of the SEQ Regional Plan 2009. Whilst this review has yet to be finalised, the government has made it clear that the “new generation” statutory regional plans focus on the particular State Planning Policy issues that require a regionally-specific policy direction for each region. This quite focused approach to statutory regional plans compares to the broader content in previous (and the current) SEQ Regional Plan. The SEQ Natural Resource Management Plan has therefore been prepared to be consistent with the State Planning Policy. Disclaimer: This information or data is provided by SEQ Catchments Limited on behalf of the Project Reference Group for the 2014 Update of the SEQ NRM Plan. You should seek specific or appropriate advice in relation to this information or data before taking any action based on its contents. So far as permitted by law, SEQ Catchments Limited makes no warranty in relation to this information or data. ii Table of Contents Moreton Bay Regional Council – Pine and Pumicestone Catchments ....................................... 1 Part A: Achieving the Moreton Bay Regional Council Community’s Vision ........................ 1 Moreton Bay Strategic Framework ............................................................................................... 1 Queensland Plan – South East Queensland Goals ........................................................................ 2 Moreton Bay Regional Development Australia ............................................................................ 2 What services are needed from natural assets to achieve these visions and priorities? ................ 2 Biodiversity is important for these services. ............................................................................. 3 Local Actions to Strengthen the Region .................................................................................... 3 Natural Assets are important for the economy ......................................................................... 2 Benefits provided by Natural Assets ............................................................................................. 6 Local Government and Community Plans ............................................................................... 11 Draft Green Infrastructure Strategy 2013 – 2031 ........................................................................ 11 Catchment Management Strategies ............................................................................................. 11 Pumicestone Passage Catchment Action Plan ............................................................................. 11 Part B: What has changed in the last 10 yrs that might affect the community’s vision for the Moreton Bay Region? ......................................................................................................... 7 Land Use Change 1999-2006 ........................................................................................................ 7 Change in Bushland(NC 1) ........................................................................................................... 7 Bushland Corridors (NC 2) ........................................................................................................... 7 Change in Water Quality (W6) ...................................................................................................... 8 Mangroves (CM1) ......................................................................................................................... 8 Positive Action ......................................................................................................................... 10 Part C: What might happen in the future? ............................................................................. 10 Further Land Use Change (NC1 and 2) ...................................................................................... 10 Potential Changes in Water Quality (W6) ................................................................................... 11 Beaches (CM2) ........................................................................................................................... 11 Key Resource Areas (L9) ............................................................................................................ 11 Salinity (L1) ................................................................................................................................ 11 Acid Sulphate Soils (L5) ............................................................................................................. 11 Erosion (L6) ................................................................................................................................ 11 Potential for Future Extreme Events (10-50yrs): ........................................................................ 12 Recent extreme weather events ................................................................................................... 12 The Millennium Drought ............................................................................................................ 12 Is the Community and Economy Prepared? ................................................................................ 15 Part D: A possible future scenario for Moreton Bay Region and Pumicestone to 2031 ... 17 Moreton Region and Pumicestone Passage SEQNRM Plan Summary ...................................... 19 Appendix A: SEQ NRM Plan Moreton and Pumicestone Roundtable – full report................ 23 Appendix B: Explanation of data used in the Maps ................................................................. 34 iii Moreton Bay Regional Part A: Achieving the Council – Pine and Moreton Bay Regional Pumicestone Catchments Council Community’s The Pine and Pumicestone Catchments 2 cover 2,100 km stretching from Vision Caloundra and Bribie Island in the North to the Pine River in the South. The The Community Plan was developed by Catchments include significant areas such Local Government in consultation with as the Pumicestone Passage, Glasshouse the community and industry and has the Mountains, Hays Inlet and Tinchi Tamba following vision: Wetlands, which are bounded in the West by the D’Aguilar Range and by Moreton A thriving region of opportunity where Bay in the East. our communities enjoy a vibrant lifestyle. Our vision is for: The Pine and Pumicestone Catchments A region of opportunity for all; host a diverse range of land use activities A region with safe, strong and including horticulture, grazing, forestry, inclusive communities; aquaculture, poultry, extractive industries, A region that celebrates our natural areas, lifestyle blocks and urban vibrant lifestyle. areas. The high build up of silt carried down by the numerous creeks which flow Moreton Bay Strategic Framework eastward across the coastal lowlands has The Strategic Framework is intended to formed vast tidal flats at the Southern half guide the development of the Region of Pumicestone Passage. The intertidal towards: flats, saltmarsh, claypan and mangroves more sustainable growth; are important to many species of protection of the significant migratory and non migratory wading and environmental values of the waterbirds that use the sites for feeding Region; and roosting. The Pumicestone Passage greater levels of self containment and Hays Inlet are listed and part of the of the jobs, services and facilities Moreton Bay Ramsar site as feeding and needed by local residents; roosting sites for migratory birds. These a better integrated transport mangrove fringed wetlands contain system, with an emphasis on extensive seagrass meadows and are active transport and walkable valuable nursery areas for commercial and communities focused on centres recreational fishing. and urban nodes; more diversity of housing choices, jobs and educational opportunities; and an emphasis on place making and urban design that builds on and 1 respects the diversity of places identity across the Region to create A digitally enabled region quality human habitats.1 A future focused region Tertiary education Queensland Plan – South East Human capital Queensland Goals In addition to this vision the following What services are needed from goals have been identified by the natural assets to achieve these community for South East Queensland as visions and priorities? part of the Queensland Plan: Some components of these visions and 1. Community cohesion priorities will rely solely on human-made 2. Strengthen Queensland’s infrastructure, goods and services (e.g. economy telecommunications, roads, schools, 3. Foster community health and hospitals etc); as well as social networks and well-being services (e.g. family relations, community 4. Balance economic priority with services, employment and childcare the environment opportunities). 5. Strengthen our regions2 However, an ‘ecosystem services approach’ These visions and goals are supported by provides the means for directly assessing the SEQ NRM Plan. the contribution of natural assets, goods and services to the well-being and Moreton Bay
Recommended publications
  • Known Impacts of Tropical Cyclones, East Coast, 1858 – 2008 by Mr Jeff Callaghan Retired Senior Severe Weather Forecaster, Bureau of Meteorology, Brisbane
    ARCHIVE: Known Impacts of Tropical Cyclones, East Coast, 1858 – 2008 By Mr Jeff Callaghan Retired Senior Severe Weather Forecaster, Bureau of Meteorology, Brisbane The date of the cyclone refers to the day of landfall or the day of the major impact if it is not a cyclone making landfall from the Coral Sea. The first number after the date is the Southern Oscillation Index (SOI) for that month followed by the three month running mean of the SOI centred on that month. This is followed by information on the equatorial eastern Pacific sea surface temperatures where: W means a warm episode i.e. sea surface temperature (SST) was above normal; C means a cool episode and Av means average SST Date Impact January 1858 From the Sydney Morning Herald 26/2/1866: an article featuring a cruise inside the Barrier Reef describes an expedition’s stay at Green Island near Cairns. “The wind throughout our stay was principally from the south-east, but in January we had two or three hard blows from the N to NW with rain; one gale uprooted some of the trees and wrung the heads off others. The sea also rose one night very high, nearly covering the island, leaving but a small spot of about twenty feet square free of water.” Middle to late Feb A tropical cyclone (TC) brought damaging winds and seas to region between Rockhampton and 1863 Hervey Bay. Houses unroofed in several centres with many trees blown down. Ketch driven onto rocks near Rockhampton. Severe erosion along shores of Hervey Bay with 10 metres lost to sea along a 32 km stretch of the coast.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia's Sunbelt Migration: the Recent Growth of Brisbane and the Moreton Bay Region
    Australia's Sunbelt Migration: The Recent Growth of Brisbane and The Moreton Bay Region Patrick Mullins INTRODUCTION The most significant contemporary change in Australian regional development has been the growth of the relatively underdeveloped states of Queensland and Western Australia, on the one hand, and the relative decline "of the spatial core of Australian capitalism, New South Wales and Victoria, on the other. The former are developing as a result of inflows of foreign capital for the exploitation and export of mineral reserves, while the ebb in New South Wales and victoria is a consequence of the decline in the early 1970s of Australia's manufacturing industry. Yet the development of Queensland and Western Australia is not simply a consequence of mineral expropriation since additional processes have operated. It is the pur­ pose of this paper to analyse the other major element involved in the" expansion" of one of these two marginal states: Queensland. The second and largely independent impetus to Queensland's development revolves around the rapid population growth of the dominant southeastern corner of the state; that is, the Moreton Region, comprising mainly metropolitan Brisbane, as well as the Gold Coast, 60 kilometres south, and the towns of the Sunshine Coast stretch­ ing 100 kilometres north. The rate of population growth in the Moreton Region during the 1960s and 1970s has been faster than Queensland and Australia as a whole, and Brisbane has grown faster over the same period than almost all major metropolitan centres. Other parts of the region, particularly the Gold Coast and the Sunshine Coast towns of Caloundra and Maroochydore/Mooloolaba, have experienced even faster growth, with the Gold Coast, for instance, doubling its population between 1954 and 1966 and then again, to over 100,000, between 1966 and 1976.
    [Show full text]
  • Suburb Snapshot KALLANGUR QLD 4053
    Suburb Snapshot KALLANGUR QLD 4053 The suburb of Kallangur is set within the Moreton Bay Region of Queensland and is an urban / semi-urban area 24 km north of Brisbane. Kallangur is bounded by the locality of Narangba in the north, the Bruce Highway in the east, Fresh Water Creek, Bunbury Street, Duffield Road, the suburb of Murrumba Downs and Bickle Road in the east, the North Pine River in the south and the railway line in the west. The population in this area has continued to increase and recent development has been in response to the general housing demand in the northern growth corridor. Locals say it is a beautiful suburb, very community minded with fetes and community events on all year round. Schools are within walking distance of the newest estates and there are many corner shops and food outlets and a small shopping centre is in the town centre. There are various health care and pet care facilities. Large shopping centres are serviced by a good public transport system with rail and buses. They say their suburb is improving all the time and is a good, affordable suburb which is great for families. 1 | P a g e Transport The Region is served by the Bruce Highway, the D'Aguilar Highway and the Brisbane-Caboolture railway line making it simple to commute to the Brisbane and the Sunshine Coast or Gold Coast. Residents of Kallangur will have even more transport options for work and recreation. The Kallangur Bypass, also referred to as the Petrie to Mango Hill transport corridor, is a proposed infrastructure project to alleviate traffic congestion in this area.
    [Show full text]
  • Citizens & Reef Science
    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Report Editor: Jennifer Loder Report Authors and Contributors: Jennifer Loder, Terry Done, Alex Lea, Annie Bauer, Jodi Salmond, Jos Hill, Lionel Galway, Eva Kovacs, Jo Roberts, Melissa Walker, Shannon Mooney, Alena Pribyl, Marie-Lise Schläppy Science Advisory Team: Dr. Terry Done, Dr. Chris Roelfsema, Dr. Gregor Hodgson, Dr. Marie-Lise Schläppy, Jos Hill Graphic Designers: Manu Taboada, Tyler Hood, Alex Levonis This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence visit: http:// This project is supported by Reef Check creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Australia, through funding from the Australian Government. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to: Reef Check Foundation Ltd, PO Box 13204 George St Brisbane QLD 4003, Project achievements have been made [email protected] possible by a countless number of dedicated volunteers, collaborators, funders, advisors and industry champions. Citation: Thanks from us and our oceans. Volunteers, Staff and Supporters of Reef Check Australia (2015). Authors J. Loder, T. Done, A. Lea, A. Bauer, J. Salmond, J. Hill, L. Galway, E. Kovacs, J. Roberts, M. Walker, S. Mooney, A. Pribyl, M.L. Schläppy. Citizens & Reef Science: A Celebration of Reef Check Australia’s volunteer reef monitoring, education and conservation programs 2001- 2014. Reef Check Foundation Ltd. Cover photo credit: Undersea Explorer, GBR Photo by Matt Curnock (Russell Island, GBR) 3 Key messages FROM REEF CHECK AUSTRALIA 2001-2014 WELCOME AND THANKS • Reef monitoring is critical to understand • Across most RCA sites there was both human and natural impacts, as well evidence of reef health impacts.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Cover Change in the South East Queensland Catchments Natural Resource Management Region 2010–11
    Department of Science, Information Technology, Innovation and the Arts Land cover change in the South East Queensland Catchments Natural Resource Management region 2010–11 Summary The woody vegetation clearing rate for the SEQ region for 10 2010–11 dropped to 3193 hectares per year (ha/yr). This 9 8 represented a 14 per cent decline from the previous era. ha/year) 7 Clearing rates of remnant woody vegetation decreased in 6 5 2010-11 to 758 ha/yr, 33 per cent lower than the previous era. 4 The replacement land cover class of forestry increased by 3 2 a further 5 per cent over the previous era and represented 1 Clearing Rate (,000 26 per cent of the total woody vegetation 0 clearing rate in the region. Pasture 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 remained the dominant replacement All Woody Clearing Woody Remnant Clearing land cover class at 34 per cent of total clearing. Figure 1. Woody vegetation clearing rates in the South East Queensland Catchments NRM region. Figure 2. Woody vegetation clearing for each change period. Great state. Great opportunity. Woody vegetation clearing by Woody vegetation clearing by remnant status tenure Table 1. Remnant and non-remnant woody vegetation clearing Table 2. Woody vegetation clearing rates in the South East rates in the South East Queensland Catchments NRM region. Queensland Catchments NRM region by tenure. Woody vegetation clearing rate (,000 ha/yr) of Woody vegetation clearing rate (,000 ha/yr) on Non-remnant Remnant
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Water Ambient Network (Water Quality) 2020-21
    Surface Water Ambient Network (Water Quality) 2020-21 July 2020 This publication has been compiled by Natural Resources Divisional Support, Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy. © State of Queensland, 2020 The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. Under this licence you are free, without having to seek our permission, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. Note: Some content in this publication may have different licence terms as indicated. For more information on this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. The Queensland Government shall not be liable for technical or other errors or omissions contained herein. The reader/user accepts all risks and responsibility for losses, damages, costs and other consequences resulting directly or indirectly from using this information. Summary This document lists the stream gauging stations which make up the Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy (DNRME) surface water quality monitoring network. Data collected under this network are published on DNRME’s Water Monitoring Information Data Portal. The water quality data collected includes both logged time-series and manual water samples taken for later laboratory analysis. Other data types are also collected at stream gauging stations, including rainfall and stream height. Further information is available on the Water Monitoring Information Data Portal under each station listing.
    [Show full text]
  • The Murray–Darling Basin Basin Animals and Habitat the Basin Supports a Diverse Range of Plants and the Murray–Darling Basin Is Australia’S Largest Animals
    The Murray–Darling Basin Basin animals and habitat The Basin supports a diverse range of plants and The Murray–Darling Basin is Australia’s largest animals. Over 350 species of birds (35 endangered), and most diverse river system — a place of great 100 species of lizards, 53 frogs and 46 snakes national significance with many important social, have been recorded — many of them found only in economic and environmental values. Australia. The Basin dominates the landscape of eastern At least 34 bird species depend upon wetlands in 1. 2. 6. Australia, covering over one million square the Basin for breeding. The Macquarie Marshes and kilometres — about 14% of the country — Hume Dam at 7% capacity in 2007 (left) and 100% capactiy in 2011 (right) Narran Lakes are vital habitats for colonial nesting including parts of New South Wales, Victoria, waterbirds (including straw-necked ibis, herons, Queensland and South Australia, and all of the cormorants and spoonbills). Sites such as these Australian Capital Territory. Australia’s three A highly variable river system regularly support more than 20,000 waterbirds and, longest rivers — the Darling, the Murray and the when in flood, over 500,000 birds have been seen. Australia is the driest inhabited continent on earth, Murrumbidgee — run through the Basin. Fifteen species of frogs also occur in the Macquarie and despite having one of the world’s largest Marshes, including the striped and ornate burrowing The Basin is best known as ‘Australia’s food catchments, river flows in the Murray–Darling Basin frogs, the waterholding frog and crucifix toad. bowl’, producing around one-third of the are among the lowest in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Moreton Bay Regional Council Moreton Bay Region 2011 Census Results
    Moreton Bay Regional Council Moreton Bay Region 2011 Census results Comparison year: 2006 Benchmark area: Greater Brisbane community profile Compiled and presented in profile.id®. http://profile.id.com.au/moreton­bay Table of contents Estimated Resident Population (ERP) 2 Population highlights 4 About the areas 7 Five year age groups 10 Ancestry 13 Birthplace 16 Year of arrival in Australia 18 Proficiency in English 20 Language spoken at home 23 Religion 26 Qualifications 28 Highest level of schooling 30 Education institution attending 33 Need for assistance 36 Employment status 39 Industry sectors of employment 42 Occupations of employment 45 Method of travel to work 48 Volunteer work 50 Unpaid care 52 Individual income 54 Household income 56 Households summary 58 Household size 61 Dwelling type 64 Number of bedrooms per dwelling 66 Internet connection 68 Number of cars per household 70 Housing tenure 73 Housing loan repayments 75 Housing rental payments 77 SEIFA - disadvantage 80 About the community profile 81 Estimated Resident Population (ERP) The Estimated Resident Population is the OFFICIAL Moreton Bay Region population for 2012. Populations are counted and estimated in various ways. The most comprehensive population count available in Australia is derived from the Census of Population and Housing conducted by the Australian Bureau of Statistics every five years. However the Census count is NOT the official population of Moreton Bay Region. To provide a more accurate population figure which is updated more frequently than every five years, the Australian Bureau of Statistics also produces "Estimated Resident Population" (ERP) numbers for Moreton Bay Region. See data notes for a detailed explanation of different population types, how they are calculated and when to use each one.
    [Show full text]
  • Queensland Government Gazette
    Queensland Government Gazette PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY ISSN 0155-9370 Vol. 382] Friday 13 December 2019 Christmas DQG New Year Dates DQG Closing Times for 201-20 Final 201 Gazette ² Published )ULGD\'HFHPEHU 201 Deadlines9DFDQF\$SSRLQWPHQWV 7REHVXEPLWWHGE\QRRQRQ7XHVGD\'HFHPEHU 'HDGOLQHV2WKHU*D]HWWHQRWLFHV 7REHVXEPLWWHGE\QRRQRQ:HGQHVGD\'HFHPEHU )LQDO$SSURYDOVE\FORVHRIEXVLQHVV:HGQHVGD\'HFHPEHU First 20 Gazette Published FridayJanuary 20 Deadlines9DFDQF\$SSRLQWPHQWV 7REHVXEPLWWHGE\QRRQRQ7XHVGD\'HFHPEHU 'HDGOLQHV2WKHU*D]HWWHQRWLFHV 7REHVXEPLWWHGE\QRRQRQ7XHVGD\'HFHPEHU )LQDO$SSURYDOVE\FORVHRIEXVLQHVV7XHVGD\'HFHPEHU ,I\RXKDYHTXHULHVUHJDUGLQJWKLVPDWWHUSOHDVHGRQRWKHVLWDWH WRFRQWDFWWKH*D][email protected] [523] Queensland Government Gazette Extraordinary PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY ISSN 0155-9370 Vol. 382] Monday 9 December 2019 [No. 106 Planning Act 2016 NOTICE OF THE MAKING OF A NEW TEMPORARY LOCAL PLANNING INSTRUMENT No. 01 OF 2019 (SUBDIVISION IN RURAL ZONE) (TLPI 01/2019) MAREEBA SHIRE COUNCIL LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREA I, the Honourable Cameron Dick MP, Minister for State Development, Manufacturing, Infrastructure and Planning, notify that I have made TLPI 01/2019 in accordance with section 27(3) of the Planning Act 2016 and the Minister’s Guidelines and Rules July 2017. TLPI 01/2019 will start to have effect on 9 December 2019 and will have effect for a period of two years unless repealed sooner. Purpose and General Effect TLPI 01/2019 provides greater certainty and transparency as to acceptable minimum lot size within the Rural zone of the Mareeba Shire Council Planning Scheme area and gives effect to the Far North Queensland Regional Plan’s intent of restricting further fragmentation of land holdings within the Regional Landscape and Rural Production Area. Location of Area to which TLPI 01/2019 Applies TLPI 01/2019 applies to development for reconfiguring a lot within the Rural zone within the Mareeba Shire Council Planning Scheme 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Caboolture Shire Handbook
    SHIRE HANDBOOK CABOOLTURE QUEENSLAND DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY INDUSTRIES LIMITED DISTRIBUTION - GOV'T.i 1NSTRUHENTALITY OFFICERS ONLY CABOOLTURE SHIRE HANDBOOK compiled by G. J. Lukey, Dipl. Trop. Agric (Deventer) Queensland Department of Primary Industries October 1973. The material in this publication is intended for government and institutional use only, and is not to be used in any court of law. 11 FOREWORD A detailed knowledge and understanding of the environment and the pressures its many facets may exert are fundamental to those who work to improve agriculture, or to conserve or develop the rural environment. A vast amount of information is accumulating concerning the physical resources and the farming and social systems as they exist in the state of Queensland. This information is coming from a number of sources and references and is scattered through numerous publications and unpublished reports. Shire Handbooks, the first of which was published in February 1969, are an attempt to collate under one cover relevant information and references which will be helpful to the extension officer, the research and survey officer or those who are interested in industry or regional planning or in reconstruction. A copy of each shire handbook is held for reference in each Division and in each Branch of the Department of Primary Industries in Brisbane. In addition Agriculture Branch holds at its Head Office and in each of its country centres, Shire Handbooks, Regional Technical Handbooks (notes on technical matters relevant to certain agricultural industries in the Shire) and monthly and annual reports which are a continuing record of the progress and problems in agriculture.
    [Show full text]
  • There Has Been an Italian Presence in the Riverland Since
    1 Building blocks of settlement: Italians in the Riverland, South Australia By Sara King and Desmond O’Connor The Riverland region is situated approximately 200 km. north-east of Adelaide and consists of a strip of land on either side of the River Murray from the South Australian-Victorian border westwards to the town of Morgan. Covering more than 20,000 sq. km., it encompasses the seven local government areas of Barmera, Berri, Loxton, Morgan, Paringa, Renmark and Waikerie.1 The region was first identified as an area of primary production in 1887 when two Canadian brothers, George and William Chaffey, were granted a licence to occupy 101,700 hectares of land at Renmark in order to establish an irrigated horticultural scheme. By 1900 a prosperous settlement had developed in the area for the production of vines and fruit, and during the 1890s Depression other ‘village settlements’ were established down river by the South Australian Government to provide work for the city-based unemployed.2 During the years between the foundation of the villages and the First World War there was intense settlement, especially around Waikerie, Loxton, Berri and Barmera, as the area was opened up and increased in value.3 After World War 1, the SA Government made available new irrigation blocks at Renmark and other localities in the Riverland area to assist the resettlement of more than a thousand returned soldiers. A similar scheme operated in New South Wales, where returned servicemen were offered blocks in Leeton and Griffith, in the Murrumbidgee Irrigation Area.4 The period after World War 2 saw further settlement of returned soldiers on fruit blocks in the Riverland and new irrigation areas were developed to cater for this growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Administration of the Nature Conservation Act 1992 (Reporting Period 1 July 2019 to 30 June 2020)
    Report on the administration of the Nature Conservation Act 1992 (reporting period 1 July 2019 to 30 June 2020) Prepared by: Department of Environment and Science © State of Queensland, 2020. The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia (CC BY) licence. Under this licence you are free, without having to seek our permission, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. For more information on this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en Disclaimer This document has been prepared with all due diligence and care, based on the best available information at the time of publication. The department holds no responsibility for any errors or omissions within this document. Any decisions made by other parties based on this document are solely the responsibility of those parties. If you need to access this document in a language other than English, please call the Translating and Interpreting Service (TIS National) on 131 450 and ask them to telephone Library Services on +61 7 3170 5470. This publication can be made available in an alternative format (e.g. large print or audiotape) on request for people with vision impairment; phone +61 7 3170 5470 or email <[email protected]>. September 2020 Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Nature Conservation Act 1992—departmental administrative responsibilities ............................................................. 1 List of legislation and subordinate legislation ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]