Moreton Bay Regional Council Moreton Bay Region 2011 Census Results

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Moreton Bay Regional Council Moreton Bay Region 2011 Census Results Moreton Bay Regional Council Moreton Bay Region 2011 Census results Comparison year: 2006 Benchmark area: Greater Brisbane community profile Compiled and presented in profile.id®. http://profile.id.com.au/moreton­bay Table of contents Estimated Resident Population (ERP) 2 Population highlights 4 About the areas 7 Five year age groups 10 Ancestry 13 Birthplace 16 Year of arrival in Australia 18 Proficiency in English 20 Language spoken at home 23 Religion 26 Qualifications 28 Highest level of schooling 30 Education institution attending 33 Need for assistance 36 Employment status 39 Industry sectors of employment 42 Occupations of employment 45 Method of travel to work 48 Volunteer work 50 Unpaid care 52 Individual income 54 Household income 56 Households summary 58 Household size 61 Dwelling type 64 Number of bedrooms per dwelling 66 Internet connection 68 Number of cars per household 70 Housing tenure 73 Housing loan repayments 75 Housing rental payments 77 SEIFA - disadvantage 80 About the community profile 81 Estimated Resident Population (ERP) The Estimated Resident Population is the OFFICIAL Moreton Bay Region population for 2012. Populations are counted and estimated in various ways. The most comprehensive population count available in Australia is derived from the Census of Population and Housing conducted by the Australian Bureau of Statistics every five years. However the Census count is NOT the official population of Moreton Bay Region. To provide a more accurate population figure which is updated more frequently than every five years, the Australian Bureau of Statistics also produces "Estimated Resident Population" (ERP) numbers for Moreton Bay Region. See data notes for a detailed explanation of different population types, how they are calculated and when to use each one. Estimated Resident Population (ERP) Moreton Bay Region Change in Change in Year (ending June 30) Number number percent 2001 286,532 -- -- 2002 294,530 +7,998 +2.79 2003 304,792 +10,262 +3.48 2004 315,505 +10,713 +3.51 2005 325,067 +9,562 +3.03 2006 332,862 +7,795 +2.40 2007 345,449 +12,587 +3.78 2008 358,647 +13,198 +3.82 2009 371,762 +13,115 +3.66 2010 382,001 +10,239 +2.75 2011 389,661 +7,660 +2.01 2012 399,406 +9,745 +2.50 Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Regional Population Growth, Australia (3218.0). Compiled and presented in profile.id by .id The population experts Page 3 of 83 Estimated Resident Population (ERP) Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Regional Population Growth, Australia (3218.0). Compiled and presented by .id the population experts Annual change in Estimated Resident Population (ERP) Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Regional Population Growth, Australia (3218.0). Compiled and presented by .id the population experts Page 4 of 83 Population highlights Moreton Bay 2011 Greater Brisbane Queensland Australia Region Median age 37 37 35 36 Median weekly $1,388 household $1,258 income $1,235 $1,234 Couples with 34% children 32% 30% 31% Older couples 9% 9% 9% without children 8% Medium and 22% 22% 25% high density 14% Housing Households with a 38% mortgage 35% 33% 33% $325 Median weekly $300 $300 rent $285 32% 32% Households 29% renting 29% Non-English 13% 9% 16% speaking 6% backgrounds 5% 4% 4% University attendance 3% 20% 16% 19% Bachelor or Higher degree 12% Vocational 22% 18% 20% 18% Page 5 of 83 13% 10% Public transport 9% (to work) 7% Unemployment 6% 6% 6% 6% SEIFA index of 1018 disadvantage 1004 2011 1002 1002 Page 6 of 83 About the area Location and boundaries The Moreton Bay Region is located in south-east Queensland, between 20 and 44 kilometres north of the Brisbane GPO. The Moreton Bay Region is bounded by the Sunshine Coast Council area in the north, the Coral Sea and Moreton Bay in the east, Brisbane City in the south, and the Somerset Region in the west. Name origin The Moreton Bay Region is named after Moreton Bay, which was named by Captain James Cook after James Douglas, the Earl of Morton. Important Population Land area Population density Statistics 378,039 203,675 1.86 2011 Usual residents hectares (2,037 persons per hectare Km2) Moreton Bay Region Legend Districts Moreton Bay Region Caboolture District small areas Caboolture overlay Pine Rivers District small areas Pine Rivers overlay Redcliffe District small areas Moreton Bay overlays Map data ©2013 GBRMPA, Google - Terms of Use Report a map error Page 7 of 83 Settlement history European settlement dates from 1824 when Queensland’s first penal settlement was established at Redcliffe. However, the settlement was relocated to Brisbane in 1825. Land was taken up in the 1840s, being used mainly for timber-getting and farming. Population was minimal until the 1860s, when grazing and farming were established (including sugar cane and cotton growing). Growth took place in the 1880s and 1890s, spurred by the opening of the railway line from Brisbane in 1888. Expansion continued during the 1930s. Significant development occurred during the post-war years, particularly from the 1960s. Rapid growth took place during the 1970s and 1980s. The population increased substantially from the early 1990s, rising from about 206,000 in 1991 to about 373,000 in 2011. Land use Land use The Moreton Bay Region is a growing residential area, with substantial rural, rural-residential, commercial and industrial areas. The Council area encompasses a total land area of over 2,000 square kilometres, including mountain ranges, water supply catchments, coastal wetlands, national parks, state forests, rural townships and urban centres. Rural land is used mainly for dairy farming, timber, beef cattle, mixed farming and tropical fruit growing. Transport The Moreton Bay Region is served by the Bruce Highway, the D’Aguilar Highway and the Brisbane­ Caboolture railway line. Major features Major features of the Moreton Bay Region include Bribie Island (the southern half), Bribie Island National Park, D’Aguilar National Park, Freshwater National Park, Glass House Mountains National Park, Moreton Bay Marine Park, Pumicestone Passage Marine Park, Bunyaville Conservation Park, Clear Mountain Conservation Park, Hayes Inlet Conservation Park, Samford Conservation Park, Pumicestone Channel, various state forests, the Caboolture CBD, the Redcliffe CBD, Morayfield Shopping Centre, Westfield Strathpine Shopping Centre, Caboolture Hospital, Redcliffe Hospital, Queensland State Equestrian Centre, Caboolture Regional Sports Park, Lakeside Motor Sport Complex, Pine Rivers Heritage Museum, Redcliffe Museum, Redcliffe Cultural Centre, Redcliffe City Art Gallery, Redcliffe Botanic Gardens, Redcliffe Paceway, Alma Park Zoo, Brisbane North Institute of TAFE (Caboolture and Redcliffe Campuses), Queensland University of Technology (Caboolture Campus), Lake Samsonvale, Lake Kurwongbah, the North Pine River, the South Pine River and numerous beaches. Indigenous background The original inhabitants of the Moreton Bay Region were the Kabi, Ningi Ningi, Turrbal and Wakka Wakka Aboriginal people. Included areas The Moreton Bay Region includes the suburbs, townships and localities of Albany Creek, Arana Hills, Armstrong Creek, Banksia Beach, Beachmere, Bellara, Bellmere, Bellthorpe, Bongaree, Booroobin, Bracalba, Bray Park, Brendale, Bunya, Burpengary, Burpengary East, Caboolture, Caboolture South, Campbells Pocket, Camp Mountain, Cashmere, Cedar Creek, Cedarton, Clear Mountain, Clontarf, Closeburn, Commissioners Flat, D'Aguilar, Dakabin, Dayboro, Deception Bay, Delaneys Creek, Donnybrook, Draper, Eatons Hill, Elimbah, Everton Hills, Ferny Hills, Godwin Beach, Griffin, Highvale, Jollys Lookout, Joyner, Kallangur, King Scrub, Kippa-Ring, Kobble Creek, Kurwongbah, Laceys Creek, Lawnton, Mango Hill, Margate, Meldale, Moodlu, Moorina, Morayfield, Mount Delaney, Mount Glorious, Mount Mee, Mount Nebo, Mount Pleasant, Mount Samson, Murrumba Downs, Narangba, Neurum, Newport, Ningi, North Lakes, Ocean View, Petrie, Redcliffe, Rocksberg, Rothwell, Rush Creek, Samford Valley, Samford Village, Samsonvale, Sandstone Point, Scarborough, Stanmore, Stony Creek, Strathpine, Toorbul, Upper Caboolture, Wamuran, Wamuran Basin, Warner, Welsby, White Patch, Whiteside, Wights Mountain, Woodford, Woody Point, Woorim and Yugar. Page 8 of 83 Page 9 of 83 Five year age groups The Age Structure of Moreton Bay Region provides key insights into the level of demand for age based services and facilities such as child care. It is also an indicator of Moreton Bay Region's residential role and function and how it is likely to change in the future. Five year age groups present a classic age profile of the population. Each age group covers exactly five years, which enables direct comparison between each group. To get a more complete picture Moreton Bay Region's Age Structure should be viewed in conjunction with Household Types and Dwelling Types. Age structure - Five year age groups Moreton Bay Region 2011 2006 Change Five year age groups Greater Greater (years) Number % Brisbane Number % Brisbane 2006 to 2011 0 to 4 28,158 7.4 7.0 22,785 7.0 6.7 +5,373 5 to 9 27,451 7.3 6.6 24,454 7.5 6.7 +2,997 10 to 14 27,317 7.2 6.5 25,841 8.0 7.0 +1,476 15 to 19 27,001 7.1 6.9 23,213 7.1 7.1 +3,788 20 to 24 22,208 5.9 7.6 18,206 5.6 7.7 +4,002 25 to 29 22,106 5.8 7.7 17,766 5.5 6.9 +4,340 30 to 34 23,644 6.3 7.2 21,890 6.7 7.5 +1,754 35 to 39 27,482 7.3 7.4 24,584 7.6 7.6 +2,898 40 to 44 28,341 7.5 7.3 24,499 7.5 7.4 +3,842 45 to 49 26,693 7.1 6.9 23,168 7.1 7.1 +3,525 50 to 54 24,320 6.4 6.4 21,496 6.6 6.4 +2,824 55 to 59 22,227 5.9 5.6 21,273 6.5 6.1 +954 60 to 64 22,008 5.8 5.2 16,718 5.1 4.5 +5,290 65 to 69 16,907 4.5 3.8 12,244 3.8 3.3 +4,663 70 to 74 11,876 3.1 2.7 9,162 2.8 2.5 +2,714 75 to 79 8,374 2.2 2.0 7,796 2.4 2.3 +578 80 to 84 6,363 1.7 1.6 5,413 1.7 1.7 +950 85 and over 5,563 1.5 1.6 4,286 1.3 1.4 +1,277 Total 378,039 100.0 100.0 324,794 100.0 100.0 +53,245 Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing 2006 and 2011.
Recommended publications
  • Australia's Sunbelt Migration: the Recent Growth of Brisbane and the Moreton Bay Region
    Australia's Sunbelt Migration: The Recent Growth of Brisbane and The Moreton Bay Region Patrick Mullins INTRODUCTION The most significant contemporary change in Australian regional development has been the growth of the relatively underdeveloped states of Queensland and Western Australia, on the one hand, and the relative decline "of the spatial core of Australian capitalism, New South Wales and Victoria, on the other. The former are developing as a result of inflows of foreign capital for the exploitation and export of mineral reserves, while the ebb in New South Wales and victoria is a consequence of the decline in the early 1970s of Australia's manufacturing industry. Yet the development of Queensland and Western Australia is not simply a consequence of mineral expropriation since additional processes have operated. It is the pur­ pose of this paper to analyse the other major element involved in the" expansion" of one of these two marginal states: Queensland. The second and largely independent impetus to Queensland's development revolves around the rapid population growth of the dominant southeastern corner of the state; that is, the Moreton Region, comprising mainly metropolitan Brisbane, as well as the Gold Coast, 60 kilometres south, and the towns of the Sunshine Coast stretch­ ing 100 kilometres north. The rate of population growth in the Moreton Region during the 1960s and 1970s has been faster than Queensland and Australia as a whole, and Brisbane has grown faster over the same period than almost all major metropolitan centres. Other parts of the region, particularly the Gold Coast and the Sunshine Coast towns of Caloundra and Maroochydore/Mooloolaba, have experienced even faster growth, with the Gold Coast, for instance, doubling its population between 1954 and 1966 and then again, to over 100,000, between 1966 and 1976.
    [Show full text]
  • Suburb Snapshot KALLANGUR QLD 4053
    Suburb Snapshot KALLANGUR QLD 4053 The suburb of Kallangur is set within the Moreton Bay Region of Queensland and is an urban / semi-urban area 24 km north of Brisbane. Kallangur is bounded by the locality of Narangba in the north, the Bruce Highway in the east, Fresh Water Creek, Bunbury Street, Duffield Road, the suburb of Murrumba Downs and Bickle Road in the east, the North Pine River in the south and the railway line in the west. The population in this area has continued to increase and recent development has been in response to the general housing demand in the northern growth corridor. Locals say it is a beautiful suburb, very community minded with fetes and community events on all year round. Schools are within walking distance of the newest estates and there are many corner shops and food outlets and a small shopping centre is in the town centre. There are various health care and pet care facilities. Large shopping centres are serviced by a good public transport system with rail and buses. They say their suburb is improving all the time and is a good, affordable suburb which is great for families. 1 | P a g e Transport The Region is served by the Bruce Highway, the D'Aguilar Highway and the Brisbane-Caboolture railway line making it simple to commute to the Brisbane and the Sunshine Coast or Gold Coast. Residents of Kallangur will have even more transport options for work and recreation. The Kallangur Bypass, also referred to as the Petrie to Mango Hill transport corridor, is a proposed infrastructure project to alleviate traffic congestion in this area.
    [Show full text]
  • West Moreton Early Childhood Development
    West Moreton early childhood development July 2015 Prepared for: Kambu Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Corporation for Health 27 Roderick Street IPSWICH QLD 4305 Prepared by: Jon Zemlicoff BA MSPD Version FINAL This page was intentionally left blank ii Project manager: __________________________ Jon Zemlicoff BA MSPD Social Planner Author: _________________________ Jon Zemlicoff BA MSPD Social Planner Technical reviewer: _________________________ Eva Ruggiero BA MSocSci-HP Jon Zemlicoff BA MSPD Toowong QLD 4066 AUSTRALIA Ph. +617 3870 1425 | Mob. +61 404 774 829 Email [email protected] Delivery The printed version of this report supplied by Jon Zemlicoff and marked “Final” is the primary project deliverable. Electronic copies provided for the convenience of the client, and any copies produced by the client or otherwise, are uncontrolled. Jon Zemlicoff will keep paper and electronic copies of this report on file. West Moreton early childhood development June 2015 by Jon Zemlicoff is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. iii Executive summary Purpose This report presents Australian Early Development Census (AEDC) data to indicate levels of demand for Kambu’s Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children and Family Centre (CFC) services in the rural parts of West Moreton region. It focuses on the five AEDC domains of early development including: physical health; social competence; emotional maturity; language and cognitive skills; and communication skills and general knowledge. A social and economic profile is provided to support this analysis. Social and economic profile The study area is a highly diverse region, including large rural/agricultural areas and some areas of rapid urban population growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Queensland Government Gazette
    Queensland Government Gazette PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY ISSN 0155-9370 Vol. 382] Friday 13 December 2019 Christmas DQG New Year Dates DQG Closing Times for 201-20 Final 201 Gazette ² Published )ULGD\'HFHPEHU 201 Deadlines9DFDQF\$SSRLQWPHQWV 7REHVXEPLWWHGE\QRRQRQ7XHVGD\'HFHPEHU 'HDGOLQHV2WKHU*D]HWWHQRWLFHV 7REHVXEPLWWHGE\QRRQRQ:HGQHVGD\'HFHPEHU )LQDO$SSURYDOVE\FORVHRIEXVLQHVV:HGQHVGD\'HFHPEHU First 20 Gazette Published FridayJanuary 20 Deadlines9DFDQF\$SSRLQWPHQWV 7REHVXEPLWWHGE\QRRQRQ7XHVGD\'HFHPEHU 'HDGOLQHV2WKHU*D]HWWHQRWLFHV 7REHVXEPLWWHGE\QRRQRQ7XHVGD\'HFHPEHU )LQDO$SSURYDOVE\FORVHRIEXVLQHVV7XHVGD\'HFHPEHU ,I\RXKDYHTXHULHVUHJDUGLQJWKLVPDWWHUSOHDVHGRQRWKHVLWDWH WRFRQWDFWWKH*D][email protected] [523] Queensland Government Gazette Extraordinary PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY ISSN 0155-9370 Vol. 382] Monday 9 December 2019 [No. 106 Planning Act 2016 NOTICE OF THE MAKING OF A NEW TEMPORARY LOCAL PLANNING INSTRUMENT No. 01 OF 2019 (SUBDIVISION IN RURAL ZONE) (TLPI 01/2019) MAREEBA SHIRE COUNCIL LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREA I, the Honourable Cameron Dick MP, Minister for State Development, Manufacturing, Infrastructure and Planning, notify that I have made TLPI 01/2019 in accordance with section 27(3) of the Planning Act 2016 and the Minister’s Guidelines and Rules July 2017. TLPI 01/2019 will start to have effect on 9 December 2019 and will have effect for a period of two years unless repealed sooner. Purpose and General Effect TLPI 01/2019 provides greater certainty and transparency as to acceptable minimum lot size within the Rural zone of the Mareeba Shire Council Planning Scheme area and gives effect to the Far North Queensland Regional Plan’s intent of restricting further fragmentation of land holdings within the Regional Landscape and Rural Production Area. Location of Area to which TLPI 01/2019 Applies TLPI 01/2019 applies to development for reconfiguring a lot within the Rural zone within the Mareeba Shire Council Planning Scheme 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Needs Analysis (August 2018)
    RDA Ipswich & West Moreton AGRICULTURAL NEEDS ANALYSIS TRANSFORMING A REGION August 2018 Kilcoy Esk Regional Development Australia Ipswich & West Moreton would like to acknowledge the traditional owners of our region – The Jagera, Kitabul, Ugarapul, Yugambeh and Yuggera people. Gatton Ipswich Laidley Springfield Lakes Disclaimer – Whilst all efforts have been made to ensure the content of this Boonah Beaudesert publication is free from error, the Regional Development Australia Ipswich & West Moreton (RDAIWM) Ipswich and West Moreton Agricultural Needs Analysis does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information. RDAIWM does not accept any liability for any persons, for any damage or loss whatsoever or howsoever caused in relation to that person taking action (or not taking action as the case may be) in respect of any statement, information or advice given in this publication. 2 RDAIWM Agricultural Needs Analysis AUG 2018 Chair’s Message As there is no single entity to bring together becoming better informed about the food they the various needs and wants for the future are eating and taking a more significant interest development of the agricultural industry of in its provenance and qualities. the four Councils of the West Moreton region Similarly, the increasing pressures of living in a (Ipswich, Somerset, Lockyer Valley and Scenic global city, as Brisbane is becoming, engenders Rim), Regional Development Australia Ipswich & a desire for respite. West Moreton (RDAIWM) has undertaken a high- level review of the vital infrastructure and policy The SEQ Regional Plan categorises most of development needs of the region. the study as: “Regional Landscape and Rural ongoing existing lists of considered, critical Production” for precisely this reason: to provide infrastructure priorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Bellthorpe Download
    k %70 KENILWORTH " Mapleton Kenilworth State Forest Forest Reserve li Bli Road BLI BLI B " O b MAPLETON MOUNT " i Nam leto WALLI bo ap n Ro ad I2NAMBOUR Obi F u r M " S k R l a oa u d OBI OBI x n " t o s n h R i n d M1 e " MAROOCHYDORE B I2 ore Rd FLAXTON yd Maleny " L h ro o c M National A Ma ot Kondalilla orway Park National C %70 MOOLOOLABA "BUDERIM " DONOVANS Park K KNOB PALMWOODS " C k A I2 O " L N y MONTVILLE L N a Maleny - nshine Moto rw Ke Su O n %70 i l d w N a R o o Moolaolah River D r R t A National Park h I2 e A CONONDALE l R l i " N o L v a t G Bellthorpe E d MOUNT on M SIPPY E K Conondale - k y State Forest MALENY n R " e l Visitor Information Map a A M I2" y a N MOOLOOLAH Ca lo W oa ndsbo G R d La r un r o dra n u R oad i e Exit 188 l v gh - E i 4wd through BellthorpeMa National Park %60 k R le c n % i y 60 y N e l R n o q a t CROHAMHURST a " " d " y leny - S I2 a a LANDSBOROUGH W CALOUNDRA M in k Irw M1 BOOROOBIN e v y e t a chester Road S w Pe a h g %6 i BELLTHORPE H e " c u r PEACHESTER " BEERWAH B Bellthorp e I2 CEDARTON R ange k Bellthorpe Ro MOUNT ad k MOUNT MARYSMOKES State Forest MOUNT d COOCHIN a MCLEAN d COMMISSIONERS FLAT o %60 k a Glass House R o Mountains e R i p Beerburrum h MOUNT National NGUNGUN a m BEERWAH k k y w Park k State r STANMORE " I2 GLASS HOUSE e COONOWRIN G Forest e MOUNTAINS B d l - %6 Coral STONY O y CREEK o y c a Sea il k W V K k Kilcoy r High ila w n WILD HORSE gu ay Beerburrum k i k 'A TIBROGARGAN MOUNTAIN D State w r I Forest m Wood e u v rr fo M1 u r e d t rb Road m Ro d e e S ru a B VILLENEUVE
    [Show full text]
  • Brisbane Valley Rail Trail – Australia's Longest Trail
    IPWEAQ State Conference 22-24 October 2019 Brisbane Valley Rail Trail – Australia’s Longest Trail A Johnson1 1Somerset Regional Council, QLD Abstract The Brisbane Valley Rail Trail (BVRT), a 157km long, off-road recreational trail is finished, with the final 27km recently completed by Somerset Regional Council. It is the longest trail in Australia and follows the disused Brisbane Valley rail corridor. Walkers, cyclists and horse riders now have a unique opportunity to experience the diverse rural landscape of the breath-taking Brisbane Valley. The project is so much more than a successful engineering outcome – it has recycled a dormant rail corridor into an iconic recreational trail that is attracting visitors and new businesses to the Somerset region. The final 27km section, Toogoolawah to Moore (T2M), was completed in June 2018, after numerous rounds of unsuccessful funding election commitments, and finally realised through a collaborative funding push by the community, local and state governments. Council prepared a business case to secure funding from the Australian Government’s Better Building Regions Fund. Community support was evident, and the cost/benefit ratio confirmed the project’s benefits would clearly outweigh the delivery cost. Council successfully secured funding totaling $3.35M. Council delivered a landmark project for Somerset and broader South-East Queensland community - the following overarching objectives were achieved: The region is benefitting from the delivery of world-class recreational trail with increased visitation to the region It’s recycled a dormant corridor with long-term community and economic benefits Residents have easy access to a recreational trail delivering health, social and cultural experiences Employment growth was achieved during construction, and jobs in rail trail operations and tourism are now created The visual outlook of the corridor has been enhanced The community’s profile is vibrant from increased public exposure And Queensland’s reputation as a cycling tourism destination has been strengthened.
    [Show full text]
  • Somerset Dam
    ENGINEERS AUSTRALIA ENGINEERING HERITAGE AUSTRALIA HERITAGE RECOGNITION PROGRAM Nomination Document for THE SOMERSET DAM BCC Image BCC-C54-16 Somerset Region South-east Queensland January 2010 Table of Contents Nomination Form .................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction........................................................................................................................................... 2 Letter of support: ................................................................................................................................... 3 Location Maps ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Heritage Assessment 1. BASIC DATA ..................................................................................................................................... 5 2. ASSESSMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE Statement of Significance:.............................................................................................................. 6 Proposed wording for interpretation panel .......................................................................................... 9 Appendix A: Paper by Geoffrey Cossins............................................................................................... 10 References .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Somerset Regional Council Recovery Plan
    Somerset Regional Council Bushfire Recovery Plan Eastern Queensland Bushfires, 7 October – 19 December 2019 Mayor CEO Endorsed by: Somerset Regional Council on 12 February 2020 Graeme Lehmann Mr Andrew Johnson Recovery narrative Somerset is a region rich in diversity. From breathtaking mountain scenery to major water resources and recreational assets such as Lakes Wivenhoe and Somerset, the Somerset region is full of beauty and discovery, which makes for an ideal country getaway and outdoor adventure. Damage and impacts Located only an hour away from Brisbane’s CBD, Somerset’s native forests, placid waterways and picturesque patchwork landscape is a major attraction for tourists and locals alike. Human and Social Environment • Community wellbeing – short term evacuations, Despite its idyllic lifestyle and location, the Somerset region is no stranger to disaster events, which has made for a robust and resilient • Approximately 25,500 hectares were affected community unit. Somerset is committed to increasing the resilience and growth of the community while continuing its commitment to a including Esk hospital. • Burnt and fallen trees – public health and sustainable future. • Community wellbeing – a number of impacted safety risk. properties not insured or underinsured. Council Mission • Concerns surrounding vegetation regrowth for • Community wellbeing – psychosocial wellbeing of rural producers community members affected, compounded trauma We, in partnership with the community, will realise our vision by: • National, state and local parks and walking • Focussing on our customer’s needs from drought. trails damaged, impacting on public access. • Planning for the future • Isolation for children due to school closure – Esk • Threat to flora and fauna in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • EHP RTI DL Release
    Release DL Ecological assessmentRTI of Browns Creek, Narangba: March 2015 EnvironmentalEHP Monitoring and Assessment Sciences Department of Science, Information Technology and Innovation 17 August 2015 RTI-16-122 File A Page 1 of 27 Prepared by David Moffatt, Sarah Lindemann and Suzanne Vardy Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Sciences Science Delivery Division Department of Science, Information Technology and Innovation PO Box 5078 Brisbane QLD 4001 © The State of Queensland (Department of Science, Information Technology and Innovation) 2015 The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia (CC BY) licence. Release Under this licence you are free, without having to seek permission from DSITI, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland, Department of Science, Information Technology and Innovation as the source of the publication.DL For more information on this licence visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en Disclaimer RTI This document has been prepared with all due diligence and care, based on the best available information at the time of publication. The department holds no responsibility for any errors or omissions within this document. Any decisions made by other parties based on this document are solely the responsibility of those parties. Information contained in this document is from a number of sources and, as such, does not necessarily represent government or departmental policy. If you need to access this document in a language other than English, please call the Translating and Interpreting Service (TIS National)EHP on 131 450 and ask them to telephone Library Services on +61 7 3170 5725 Citation DSITI 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Update of the SEQ NRM Plan: Moreton Bay Region Incorporating Pumicestone and Pine Catchments
    Item: 2014 Update of the SEQ NRM Plan – Moreton Bay Region Date: Last updated 11 November 2014 2014 Update of the SEQ NRM Plan: Moreton Bay Region incorporating Pumicestone and Pine Catchments How can the SEQ NRM Plan support the Community’s Vision? Supporting Document 7 for the 2014 Update of the SEQ Natural Resource Management Plan Note regards State Government Planning Policy: The Queensland Government is currently undertaking a review of the SEQ Regional Plan 2009. Whilst this review has yet to be finalised, the government has made it clear that the “new generation” statutory regional plans focus on the particular State Planning Policy issues that require a regionally-specific policy direction for each region. This quite focused approach to statutory regional plans compares to the broader content in previous (and the current) SEQ Regional Plan. The SEQ Natural Resource Management Plan has therefore been prepared to be consistent with the State Planning Policy. Disclaimer: This information or data is provided by SEQ Catchments Limited on behalf of the Project Reference Group for the 2014 Update of the SEQ NRM Plan. You should seek specific or appropriate advice in relation to this information or data before taking any action based on its contents. So far as permitted by law, SEQ Catchments Limited makes no warranty in relation to this information or data. ii Table of Contents Moreton Bay Regional Council – Pine and Pumicestone Catchments ....................................... 1 Part A: Achieving the Moreton Bay Regional Council Community’s Vision ........................ 1 Moreton Bay Strategic Framework ............................................................................................... 1 Queensland Plan – South East Queensland Goals ........................................................................ 2 Moreton Bay Regional Development Australia ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Water Netserv Plan Overview and Guide
    WATER NETSERV PLAN OVERVIEW AND GUIDE ENRICH QUALITY OF LIFE URBAN UTILITIES STRATEGIC PLANNING – OUR VISION TO OUR CUSTOMERS As a business, Urban Utilities has defined that Our Purpose is to Enrich quality of life. Our Vision is to play a valued role in enhancing the liveability of our communities. A key element in delivering on these promises is the role that Urban Utilities plays in delivering high quality water services and facilitating growth across South East Queensland. The Water Netserv Plan (Part A) (Netserv Plan) outlines the scope of services that will be provided to our retail customers, in addition to the standard of service outcomes and how these services will be charged. The Netserv Plan also provides developers with a summary of the planning assumptions, including population growth, of each of the Council regions QUU services. These outline the expectations for the scope and location of future growth across the region and the anticipated capital investment program to accommodate this expansion. For each of the Stakeholder Councils, the Netserv Plan outlines the business processes Urban Utilities will use to deliver on the growth ambitions identified in each of the Planning Schemes. Collectively, the outcomes from the Netserv Plan outline both what Urban Utilities intends to deliver and the business processes for how these outcomes will be achieved. Urban Utilities Water Netserv Plan 1 2 Urban Utilities Water Netserv Plan CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 1. URBAN UTILITIES 6 1.1 Who we are 6 1.2 Our stakeholdres 6 1.3 What we do 6 1.4 Our Customer Charter 7 1.5 Our Operating Environment 7 1.6 Water Demand Management 9 1.7 Water Consumption Trends 9 1.8 Water Supply Network 9 1.9 Capacity of Infrastructure Networks 9 2.
    [Show full text]