caring for our country Achievements Report COASTAL ENVIRONMENTS AND CRITICAL AQUATIC HABITATS 2008 –2013 Coastwest, community seagrass monitoring project, Roebuck Bay, Broome, Western Australia. Source: Environs Kimberley Coastal Environments and Critical Aquatic Habitats Coastal Environments and Critical Aquatic Habitats

Fragile ecosystems are being protected and rehabilitated by improving water quality, protecting Ramsar wetlands and delivering the Great Barrier Reef Rescue package.

Coastwest, community seagrass monitoring project, Roebuck Bay, Broome, Western Australia. Source: Environs Kimberley

3 Table of contents

Introduction 6

Reef Rescue outcomes 9

Outcome 1 Reduce the discharge of dissolved nutrients and chemicals from agricultural lands to the Great Barrier Reef lagoon by 25 per cent. 9

Outcome 2 Reduce the discharge of sediments and nutrients from agricultural lands to the Great Barrier Reef lagoon by 10 per cent 9

Case study: Minimal soil disturbance in cane farming—Tully/Murray catchment, Queensland 10

Case study: Repairing bank erosion in the Upper Johnstone catchment, Queensland 12

Case study: Sugar cane partnerships, Mackay Whitsunday region, Queensland 13

Case study: Horticulturalists nurturing the reef, Mackay Whitsunday region, Queensland 14

Case study: Land and Sea Country Indigenous Partnerships Program, Queensland 15

Outcome 3.1 Deliver actions that sustain the environmental values of priority sites in the Ramsar estate, particularly sites in northern and remote Australia. 17

Case study: Currawinya Lakes Ramsar wetland, Queensland 18

Case study: Macquarie Marshes Ramsar wetland, New South Wales 22

Case study: Interlaken Ramsar wetland, Tasmania 23

Case study: Peel–Yalgorup System Ramsar wetland, Western Australia 25

Outcome 3.2 Deliver actions that sustain the environmental values of an additional 25 per cent of (non-Ramsar) priority coastal and inland high conservation value aquatic ecosystems [now known as high ecological value aquatic ecosystems] including, as a priority, sites in the Murray–Darling Basin. 26

Case study: Lower Ovens River System high ecological value aquatic ecosystem, Victoria 27

Case study: Derwent Estuary high ecological value aquatic ecosystem, Tasmania 28

Case study: Anson Bay high ecological value aquatic ecosystem, Northern Territory 30

Outcome 4 Improve the water quality management in the Gippsland Lakes in Victoria, the Tuggerah Lakes Estuary in New South Wales and in all priority coastal hotspots. 31

Case study: Corner Inlet coastal hotspot, Victoria 31

Case study: Gippsland Lakes, Victoria 33

Case study: Tuggerah Lakes Estuary, New South Wales 35

Case study: Botany Bay coastal hotspot, New South Wales 37

Case study: Hunter River Estuary coastal hotspot, New South Wales 38

Case study: Swan Canning Estuary System coastal hotspot, Western Australia 39

Case study: Vasse Wonnerup and Geographe Bay coastal hotspot, Western Australia 40 Outcome 5 Increase the community’s participation in protecting and rehabilitating coastal environments and critical aquatic habitats 42

Case study: Glenelg Alliance, Victoria 43

Case study: Coastal communities protecting beach-nesting birds, Victoria 44

Case study: Catchment to coast—managing and restoring environmental values in the Cygnet River, South Australia 46

Case study: Water quality improvements in the Great Lakes—a community partnership, New South Wales 47

Case study: Partnerships protecting sea turtles, Queensland 48

 Case study: Coastwest/Coastcare: engaging communities in caring for the coast, Western Australia 49

Case study: Caring for our Coast, New South Wales 50 Coastal Environments and Critical Aquatic Habitats Case study: Filling the gaps for Coastcare communities in southern Tasmania 51

Continued investment in Australia’s urban and coastal aquatic habitats – Phase II Caring for our Country 2013—2018 52

References 54

5 improving water quality in coastal hotspots and Introduction increasing community participation in coastal and aquatic restoration. Funded projects aimed to Australia’s coasts and critical aquatic habitats are ensure that these sites are sustained into the future. significant environmental assets which are also Caring for our Country investments focused on particular fundamentally important to the Australian lifestyle and approaches for achieving a number of strategic five-year economy. These environments support ecosystems outcomes. These approaches included: and provide habitat for threatened, marine and »» providing incentives for improved land management migratory species and they also have cultural and practices to reduce sediment, nutrients and recreational values and support livelihoods. chemical discharges from agricultural lands The Caring for our Country initiative recognised the »» allocating funding for planning and on-ground importance of these ecosystem services by providing activities to conserve these environments targeted investments to protect the Great Barrier Reef, Ramsar wetlands, high ecological value aquatic »» investing in research and practices to improve ecosystems and priority coastal hotspots. water quality. The Great Barrier Reef is an internationally significant An essential aspect of these strategies was to build coral reef ecosystem that requires special protection the capacity of communities and land managers, as a World Heritage area and matter of national including Indigenous communities, to implement environmental significance under the Environment activities that improve coastal and aquatic assets. Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 Community organisations played an important role (EPBC Act). All of these coastal and aquatic assets face in mitigating the challenges of climate change, a range of pressures, including declining water quality, population growth and degradation of coastal climate change, dune erosion, habitat loss from urban environments. Funding was provided to deliver training development, land clearing and increased traffic and knowledge and enhance the capacity and skills from ports and marinas. of local communities to take actions to rehabilitate coastal waterways and wetlands, prevent coastal Identified priorities for the national priority area included erosion and protect important migratory bird sites. reducing sediment and nutrient discharge to the Great Indigenous communities were supported to reduce Barrier Reef lagoon, protecting and restoring Ramsar coastal and marine debris to protect threatened wetlands and high ecological value aquatic ecosystems, species such as turtles and dugongs.

Tropical fish, Great Barrier Reef. Source: A. Heaney, DSEWPaC Coastal Environments and Critical Aquatic Habitats

Water testing at a banana plantation, Innisfail, Queensland. Source: A. Heaney, DSEWPaC

7 In order to address the issues and challenges of the Various projects were funded to achieve the theme area, funding was targeted to achieve five five-year outcomes and long-term objective for outcomes by 2013: coastal environments and critical aquatic habitats. These projects, which aimed to improve environmental »» reduce the discharge of dissolved nutrients and conditions and reverse the impact of threats to these chemicals from agricultural lands to the Great Barrier assets, included: Reef lagoon by 25 per cent »» reduce the discharge of sediment and nutrients »» establishing stewardship arrangements to from agricultural lands to the Great Barrier Reef protect high conservation value areas lagoon by 10 per cent »» establishing buffer zones and fencing to »» deliver actions that sustain the environmental protect water bodies from stock values of: »» improving the application of chemical fertiliser »» priority sites in the Ramsar estate, particularly sites and herbicide in northern and remote Australia, and »» reducing and managing acid sulfate soils and –– an additional 25 per cent of (non-Ramsar) salinity priority coastal and inland high ecological value »» restoring wetlands and coastal areas aquatic ecosystems including, as a priority, »» revegetating and managing weeds in major sites in the Murray–Darling Basin waterways and remnant bushland –– improve the water quality management in the »» developing Indigenous land and sea country Gippsland Lakes in Victoria, the Tuggerah management projects Lakes Estuary in New South Wales and all priority coastal hotspots »» working with Indigenous communities to record and pass on traditional ecological knowledge and »» increase the community’s participation in protect culturally important landscapes protecting and rehabilitating coastal environments and critical aquatic habitats. »» trialling new technologies or techniques to improve water quality »» expanding water quality monitoring programs. The achievement of five-year outcomes for this theme area assisted with reversing the impact of threats facing the Great Barrier Reef, Australia’s Ramsar wetlands and other high-value aquatic and coastal environments, while ensuring that local communities had the information and support to effectively address local threats to these environments. Ongoing efforts and investments are required to continue the successful management of priority coastal and aquatic sites. Reef Rescue outcomes1 Outcome 1 Reduce the discharge of dissolved nutrients Great Barrier Reef and chemicals from agricultural lands to the World Heritage area Great Barrier Reef lagoon by 25 per cent. Outcome 2 Reduce the discharge of sediments and nutrients from agricultural lands to the QLD Great Barrier Reef lagoon by 10 per cent.

Australia’s Great Barrier Reef extends across 0 600 Coastal Environments and Critical Aquatic Habitats 348 000 square kilometres of Queensland’s coastline km and was listed as a World Heritage area in 1981 300 because of its outstanding universal value. One of its natural values is that the reef provides habitat for a number of protected species such as dugongs (Dugong dugon), grey nurse sharks (Carcharias taurus), leatherback (Dermochelys Great Barrier Reef. Source: ERIN, DSEWPaC coriacea) and loggerhead (Caretta caretta) turtles, and freshwater sawfish (Pristis microdon). The Great Barrier Reef is the world’s largest coral reef In the first phase, the program comprised a number ecosystem and contains a globally unique array of of components: interconnected ecological communities, habitats and species. The integrity of these diverse ecosystems »» water quality grants for on-ground works, and is managed by the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park funding for developing partnerships and community Authority in cooperation with the Queensland and participation ($158 million over five years) Australian governments. Tourism associated with »» monitoring and reporting ($22 million over five years) the national icon supports around 63 000 jobs and contributes more than $5 billion annually to the »» research and development ($10 million over Australian economy. In terms of agricultural production, two years) the reef and its surrounding catchments contribute »» Land and Sea Country Indigenous Partnerships more than $40 billion to the Australian economy each Program ($10 million over five years). year. The sea-country also has important cultural and spiritual significance for Indigenous people, Reducing the pollutants from land-based activities that as it contains story places and marine totems. enter the reef lagoon helped to improve the resilience of the reef against other pressures. Since the declaration of the Great Barrier Reef Commonwealth Marine Park in 1975, the Australian The Reef Rescue program supported agricultural land Government has implemented various measures to managers to reduce the discharge levels of nutrients, address pressures on the reef. While the Great Barrier pesticide and sediment entering the reef from the land. Reef is recognised as one of the best-managed marine Reef Rescue activities were undertaken to implement protected areas in the world, it is under threat from a the Reef Water Quality Protection Plan (Reef Plan). range of natural and human-induced disturbances. The Reef Plan was jointly agreed by the Australian Threats include climate change, the crown of thorns and Queensland governments in 2003 and was starfish (Acanthaster planci), cyclones, floods, and updated in 2009. It is currently under review. coral bleaching events. These threats were addressed Reef Rescue complemented the Reef Plan and sought through the $200 million Reef Rescue program in the to reduce the decline in water quality by 2013. first phase of Caring for our Country. Reef Rescue will The Australian and Queensland governments also continue to be funded in the next phase of the initiative recently announced a comprehensive strategic from 2013–2018. assessment of the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage area to create an agreed, long-term plan for 1 All Reef Rescue figures are correct at February 2013. sustainable development in the region.

9 The large-scale investment and five-year commitments Key achievements of the of Reef Rescue allowed delivery agents to plan Reef Rescue program: strategically to meet the ambitious targets of increasing the uptake of land managers to adopt improved land »» understanding the water quality benefits of management practices. Land managers were assisted diverse agricultural practices to improve water quality leaving their properties. »» tailoring delivery to local conditions and The run-off of excessive amounts of chemicals and leveraging local support nutrients from pastoral properties has devastating »» developing partnerships with industry consequences on the reef and surrounding mangrove ecosystems. These chemicals and nutrients can lead »» evidence-based prioritisation through robust to loss of coral and the species that depend on it for and transparent investment metrics survival. A key success of the Reef Rescue program »» embedding ongoing improvements within was the integrated nature of investment, with industry systems $158 million committed over five years to provide »» demonstrating adaptation and effectively water quality grants and develop partnerships to managing intervening factors such as floods deliver targeted on-ground works. and cyclones »» data collection and reporting of program outputs and practice changes.

Minimal soil disturbance in cane farming —Tully/Murray catchment, Queensland

Reef Rescue funding supported Mario Raccanello, a land manager of a 241 hectare sugar cane CASE STUDY farm near Tully, to address water quality issues relating to nutrients, pesticides and sediment run-off by implementing a new, sustainable farming system. With the farm located near a waterway and 10 per cent of the property prone to occasional flooding, improved farming practices on this property will have significant benefits for the quality of water in the catchment. Funding enabled Mario to transition Sugar cane. Source: A. Heaney, DSEWPaC his farming system from full tillage to zonal cultivations. Reduced cultivation of crops made the soil less prone to erosion. The zonal cultivator system allowed sugar cane to be planted without disturbing the inter-row space, while controlled traffic left the inter-row undisturbed and thereby minimised tillage. By transitioning to a system of zonal tillage, the amount of soil disturbance and movement of pollutants from planting will be reduced by approximately 50 per cent. Mario intends to develop a farm nutrient management plan for all of the blocks on his farm—this will allow him to apply the correct amount of nutrients and minimise losses. This project also involved the purchase of a new laser levelling mechanism that will help level the soil to minimise water logging and run-off, reducing erosion and the movement of nutrients attached to soil particles. By reducing excessive cultivation and passage of machinery, the structure and health of the soil will be improved over time. Improved soil structure and health will also improve crop productivity and result in more efficient use of nutrients. The combination of new practices being used to minimise the movement of pollutants and off-farm run-off will greatly improve the quality of water entering the Great Barrier Reef from this property. The water quality grants component of Reef Rescue provided training, extension services and funding Reef Alliance was the successful partnerships for on-ground works to land managers in priority component of the Reef Rescue delivery catchments so that they could adopt improved model, acting as a collaborative network of practices that reduced pesticide, fertiliser and sediment six regional natural resource management run-off into the Great Barrier Reef. This aspect of the (NRM) groups from the Burnett Mary, Fitzroy, program achieved its land manager engagement Mackay Whitsundays, Burdekin, Cape York and targets in the first four years of the Caring for our Wet Tropics regions and five peak agricultural Country initiative, having contracted more than industry bodies, supported by conservation 2900 individual land managers to undertake groups such as the World Wildlife Fund (WWF). on-ground projects, including: These organisations originally proposed the Reef Rescue program and successfully delivered »» reducing sediment loss from agricultural land the grants and partnerships components. through practices such as reduced tillage, Reef Alliance developed and refined an retention of crop residues, minimisation of innovative delivery model that enabled the effects of machinery through controlled agricultural land managers to use multiple traffic farming, establishment of good levels of pathways to engage with a program that was ground cover between permanent planting and tailored to regional and industry circumstances, managing pastures to maintain adequate levels yet retained a clear focus on delivering water of ground cover Coastal Environments and Critical Aquatic Habitats quality benefits. »» reducing losses and improving fertiliser efficiency on farmland »» using pesticides more efficiently and reducing losses to waterways »» undertaking strategic fencing activities and providing off-stream watering points for stock management and pasture/stock monitoring »» improving the efficiency of use and management of irrigation water.

11 Repairing bank erosion in the Upper Johnstone catchment, Queensland

A grazing property on the Atherton Tablelands in the Upper Johnstone catchment received funding from Reef CASE STUDY Rescue to reduce sediment loss from eroded areas and restrict cattle access to the gully and Williams Creek. The property owner also provided in-kind and cash contributions.

Before this project commenced, considerable work had already been done to repair bank erosion and sediment loss on the property. Funding from Reef Rescue supported fencing to prevent cattle access at Upper Johnstone, Atherton Tablelands, Queensland. two of the three cattle crossings Source: M. Mohell, DSEWPaC and revegetation of the gully with approximately 3000 trees. Two off-stream watering points will be installed for the cattle as an alternative source of water, and water from the troughs will be used to irrigate the planted tree seedlings in periods of little rainfall. The trees will be planted using jute matting to reduce weed cover and water loss from the young plants.

Revegetating the gully will hold the creek banks in place and minimise soil loss from erosion, particularly in intense rainfall events. Gully fencing and off-stream watering will stop the cattle from drinking from the creek, thus preventing disturbance of banks and sediment run-off.

The water quality grants and partnerships component of The second report card for 2010 was published in 2013 Reef Rescue was supported by a $22 million monitoring and observed major positive change in the catchments. and reporting program over five years, which was Overall, across the Great Barrier Reef region, there has co-funded by and implemented with the Queensland been good progress by land managers towards Reef Government. As one part of this monitoring and Plan targets. Twenty per cent of sugarcane growers, reporting, water quality report cards were produced. 11 per cent of graziers and 18 per cent of horticulture The first Reef Plan Water Quality Report Card was producers have adopted improved management published in 2011 and used historical data and trends practices (GBR, 2013). The modelled pollutant load to estimate the status of key water quality indicators for reductions in the report card confirmed the good the period preceding 2009. This information acted as a progress in management practice change. It shows baseline point of comparison for measuring progress that estimated average annual pollutant loads were towards achieving Caring for our Country outcomes. reduced in 2009—2010 – nitrogen by four per cent, In addition, Reef Rescue was further supported by a phosphorus by two per cent, sediment by two per cent $10 million research package over two years. and pesticides by eight per cent (GBR, 2013). An integrated portfolio of 18 research projects aimed to increase understanding of the link between land management practices and environmental impacts on the Great Barrier Reef. These research projects focused on ensuring that the benefits of intervention could be demonstrated, learning could take place and future refinements could be identified. Sugar cane partnerships, Mackay Whitsunday region, Queensland

Caring for our Country provided over $15 million over three years to improve the land management of sugar cane farms and water quality in the Mackay Whitsunday NRM region on the central Queensland coast. Sugar cane occupies 18.5 per cent or around 167 000 hectares of the total land area of the region. CASE STUDY Landholders received grants to adopt practices that reduced the amount of nutrients, chemicals and sediments leaving their farms and affecting reef water quality. Partners provided information to landholders such as on-site risk assessments and helped them to develop property plans.

Sugar cane farmers who participated in the initiative targeted soil (through machinery modifications of controlled traffic, zonal tillage units and GPS guidance); chemical use (shielded sprayer units); fertiliser use (nutrient management plans and improved application through use of sub-surface compost and variable rate technology); and irrigation (recycling).

There were 412 sugar cane growers involved in the first two years of the project. One participating grower owns two farms west of Mackay and said that the incentives helped him to make changes on the farms sooner, rather than over a five- or ten-year time frame. He converted his farm to a controlled traffic system Coastal Environments and Critical Aquatic Habitats and incorporated rotational legume fallow crops to increase ground cover, reduce run-off and improve soil structure. Funding helped him to modify his equipment to match the new row spacing and purchase a legume planter.

Many growers in the sugar industry participated in the initiative, and graziers and horticulturalists were also involved. Improvements to water quality and achievement of Reef Rescue outcomes far exceeded original expectations. The project has reduced the amount of suspended sediments, particulate nitrogen loads, particulate phosphorous and pesticides entering the reef lagoon.

Deeragun" " Townsville-Thuringowa "

Ayr " Home Hill " Mackay Whitsunday NRM Region

Bowen " NT " QLD

Cannonvale " " Proserpine " SA Collinsville " NSW Mackay Whitsunday NRM Region

Mackay " Walkerston "

Sarina "

Moranbah "

0 125 250 r km Dysart "

Mackay Whitsunday NRM region. Source: ERIN, DSEWPaC "

13 Horticulturalists nurturing the reef, Mackay Whitsunday region, Queensland

Caring for our Country supported producers of bananas, lychees, mangos, eggplants and macadamia to improve their land management practices in the Mackay Whitsunday region, reducing CASE STUDY sediment run-off and impacts from nutrients and chemicals on the Great Barrier Reef. Caring for our Country provided more than $368 000 in water quality grants which were managed by Reef Catchments. On average, producers contributed about 60 per cent of the total project costs.

There was a steady uptake of the water quality grants to complete on-ground projects. An additional 11 irrigation or stormwater subprojects were carried out, including installing fertigation systems (injecting fertiliser using irrigation systems) and sediment detention basins. One of these projects was completed by an organic banana farm owner from Calen who was keen to improve his irrigation system. Funding helped him to implement an under-canopy micro-sprinkler irrigation system with fertigation capabilities: previously, the cost had been prohibitive for implementing this new system. The irrigation system reduced losses from evaporation and run-off from dissolved Banana plantation. Source: A.Heaney, DSEWPaC nutrients by using targeted nutrient applications through fertigation, and maintaining inter-row ground cover.

Additional projects delivered from the water quality grants included nine soil sub-projects, including maintaining grassed inter-rows between tree crops; six nutrient sub-projects, including improved fertiliser application; and six chemical sub-projects, including the adoption of ‘knockdown’ chemicals for weed control. Anecdotally, many producers said they would not have thought about or started their activities for at least five to ten years, if at all, without the water quality grants.

“We can apply the right amount at the right time and have confidence in the equipment we are using”—banana grower.

Irrigation pipes on a banana plantation. Source: A. Heaney, DSEWPaC Land and Sea Country Indigenous Partnerships Program, Queensland

The $10 million Land and Sea Country Indigenous Partnerships Program is a component of the Reef Rescue initiative, actively engaging Indigenous communities in managing and protecting the reef’s marine resources and cultural diversity by: CASE STUDY

»» expanding Traditional Use of Marine Resources Agreements across the Great Barrier Reef »» strengthening communications and knowledge sharing »» enhancing compliance »» engaging with communities »» building community capacity through grants and sponsorship opportunities. The program is working with approximately 40 of the 70 Traditional Owner groups within the Great Barrier Reef to undertake sea country management activities such as transferring traditional ecological knowledge. This program is closely coordinated with other Caring for our Country Indigenous partnership initiatives such as Working on Country. Coastal Environments and Critical Aquatic Habitats

Over five years, the program has effectively delivered expansion of Traditional Use of Marine Resource Agreements, including enhanced compliance, and strengthened communications between local communities, managers and stakeholders to build a better understanding of Traditional Owner issues for managing the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park.

Through Traditional Use of Marine Resource Agreements, many Indigenous people are able to practice ‘living maritime culture’: providing traditional food for their families and educating younger generations about traditional and cultural rules, protocols and activities in sea country. There are six Traditional Owner management agreements which now cover 42 860 square kilometers of sea country and involve 14 Traditional Owner groups. Three new agreements are in the final stages of accreditation and assessment.

The Indigenous Community Compliance Liaison Program has been an effective way of communicating with community ranger groups on potential incidents in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park. Forty-one days of compliance training has been delivered to 36 Indigenous community groups, with over 300 participants. This training has resulted in increased joint field surveillance activities with Traditional Owners and Indigenous rangers in high-risk areas.

Numerous initiatives have been undertaken to strengthen lines of communication and collaboration with Indigenous groups in the Great Barrier Reef, including forums, conferences, exchanges, formal and informal tertiary education and training, photographic competitions, leadership activities and scientific workshops. These measures have successfully improved engagement of both women and youth in sea country management. In addition, over $1 million has been provided to Traditional Owners under the small grants component of the program.

The Land and Sea Country Indigenous Partnerships Program successfully engaged the majority of Traditional Owners with connections to the Great Barrier Reef.

15 The mid-term Review of Caring for our Country assessed the overall Reef Rescue investment as appropriate, efficient and effective. Stakeholders identified the program as a good model for engaging multiple industry and regional partners to address landscape-scale issues. Similarly, an independent paper on the program delivery model reflected these views. The Review also identified that devolution of funds to regional NRM bodies and industry groups and the partnerships established through the Reef Alliance encouraged greater effectiveness, promoted efficiency and allowed for greater community legacy and ongoing behavioural change through local ownership. Land managers Sugar cane harvesting, Ingham, Queensland. Source: M. Mohell, DSEWPaC co-invested an average of $1.80 for every $1 of Reef Rescue investment, illustrating that there is a real desire to improve practices for the future sustainability of the environment and livelihoods. Outcome 3.1 nationally threatened species; or may be of outstanding historical or cultural significance. These aquatic ecosystems include rivers, wetlands, Deliver actions that sustain the floodplains, lakes, inland saline ecosystems, environmental values of priority sites in groundwater-dependent ecosystems and estuaries. the Ramsar estate, particularly sites in Some of these sites are recognised by a number northern and remote Australia. of international conventions such as the World Heritage Convention and East Asian–Australasian Aquatic habitats are significant environmental assets Flyway Site Network. and Caring for our Country investments made significant progress towards restoring and protecting Ramsar and high ecological value aquatic ecosystems the environmental values of priority Ramsar-listed face similar environmental pressures, including physical wetland sites and other high ecological value aquatic loss, modification or encroachment on the wetland, ecosystems. Ramsar wetlands are recognised as loss of biodiversity, pollution and increased nutrient internationally important for containing representative, input, changes to water regimes, over-utilisation of rare or unique examples of ecosystems or for resources and the introduction of invasive species. conserving biological diversity. In addition to being Caring for our Country prioritised projects to help internationally protected, Ramsar sites are identified as mitigate these pressures on significant natural assets a matter of national environmental significance under and result in the adoption of improved management the EPBC Act. Coastal Environments and Critical Aquatic Habitats practices. Actions to address key threats varied across High ecological value aquatic ecosystems in coastal sites but included activities such as controlling weeds, and inland areas have been identified by the Australian restoring habitat, controlling feral animals, managing Government as priorities for management, as they public access, managing fire regimes, monitoring perform important landscape functions; and managing water quality and increasing habitat provide habitat, breeding sites and refuge for connectivity through structural improvements.

Cobourg Peninsula

Darwin "

Ord River Floodplain

Roebuck Bay ! Eighty-mile Beach ! Bowling Green Bay

Great Sandy Strait (including Tin Can Bay and Tin Can Inlet).

Coongie Lakes Brisbane ! " ! Currawinya Lakes Gwydir Wetlands ! The Macquarie Marshes ! Perth " Peel-Yalgorup !( Myall Lakes System ! ! Toolibin Lake "Riverland" Sydney ! !( " Vasse-Wonnerup Adelaide System " Canberra Barmah Forest " !(

! Melbourne Bool and Hacks Lagoons " ! !( Gippsland Lakes Western District Lakes

Lavinia !( Jocks Lagoon !( Apsley Marshes 0 500 1,000 2,000 Hobart km "

Targeted Ramsar sites. ERIN, DSEWPaC

17 Currawinya Lakes Ramsar wetland, Queensland

The Currawinya Lakes (Currawinya National Park) Ramsar wetland covers around 151 300 hectares in south-west Queensland’s Paroo River catchment and has a diverse array of native plants, mammals, birds and reptiles. The site is also highly significant to local Indigenous communities for its archaeological, traditional and contemporary social values. The site includes stone arrangements, native wells, trees with

bark removed for canoes and shields, stone artefacts and burial grounds. CASE STUDY

Caring for our Country provided funding to the Queensland Department of Environment and Natural Resource Management to implement an integrated pest control program to maintain and improve the ecological character of the lakes. Priority pest animal control methods and pest hotspots were identified using current and historical pest management data, including knowledge from Traditional Owners. The data has been used to help direct feral pig control using methods such as ground baiting, trapping and shooting in over 10 000 hectares in the Caiwarro section of the Currawinya National Park. Controlling feral pigs was important, as they disturb and reduce habitat for native species. Working in partnership with Traditional Owners, site inspections were conducted to determine the location and conditions for fencing.

During the dry season, flora and fauna surveys, habitat threat assessments and water quality monitoring were conducted over 50 000 hectares of the wetland. These findings contributed to the pest control program. The project will continue to deliver benefits for the protection and improvement of the Currawinya Lakes Ramsar wetland.

Currawinya National Park, Queensland. Source: R. Purdie, DSEWPaC Coastal Environments and Critical Aquatic Habitats

Barwon–Darling River at Collarenebri, New South Wales. Source: A. Mostead, DSEWPaC

For the majority of projects, it was important to In the Ramsar estate, Caring for our Country develop landscape-scale interventions to effectively investments focused on identified priority sites in protect environmental values. Site managers were which the ecological character was particularly also supported to improve their management capacity under threat and management plans or ecological through the development of site management plans character descriptions were already in place to guide as well as investment in projects to control serious strategic funding allocations. Caring for our Country on-ground threats such as inappropriate land also prioritised sustaining the environmental values of management practices and invasive animals and Ramsar sites in northern and remote Australia. plants. In 92 per cent of the funded sites, actions Northern and remote Australia contains some of to address key threats were undertaken and were the continent’s most intact high conservation value deemed to have had a moderate impact on stabilising landscapes and environmental assets. Of the 22 sites threats at 57 per cent of the sites. It was essential that were identified as priorities for investment, the to establish partnerships and improve stakeholder Currawinya Lakes (QLD), Ord River Floodplain (WA), knowledge, skills and governance of sites to achieve Eightymile Beach (WA), Roebuck Bay (WA), Coongie condition change and long-term outcomes. Lakes (SA) and Cobourg Peninsula (NT) were located in northern and remote Australia.

19 While funding was available for all Ramsar sites, the following sites were prioritised for investment.

Queensland Currawinya Lakes (Currawinya National Park) Great Sandy Strait Bowling Green Bay

Western Australia Ord River Floodplain Roebuck Bay Eightymile Beach Lake Toolibin Vasse–Wonnerup System Bool and Hacks Lagoon Ramsar site, near Naracoote, Peel–Yalgorup System South Australia. Source: B. Gray, DSEWPaC

South Australia Coongie Lakes ‘Riverland’ Bool and Hacks Lagoons

Northern Territory Cobourg Peninsula Victoria Barmah Forest Western District Lakes Gippsland Lakes

Tasmania Lavinia Jocks Lagoon Apsley Marshes

New South Wales Macquarie Marshes Myall Lakes Gwydir Wetlands: Gingham and Lower Gwydir (Big Leather) Watercourses Shell midden at Roebuck Bay, Broome, Western Australia. Source: S. Stuart-Smith, DSEWPaC Coastal Environments and Critical Aquatic Habitats

Community seagrass monitoring project, Roebuck Bay, Broome. Source: Environs Kimberley

21 Macquarie Marshes Ramsar wetland, New South Wales

Caring for our Country provided $700 000 over three years to the Central West Catchment Management Authority to improve the ecological character of the CASE STUDY Macquarie Marshes Ramsar wetland. The wetland is located in central-north New South Wales on the lower floodplain of the Macquarie River and covers over 19 000 hectares. It includes private and public land that is rich in biodiversity and supports some of the largest waterbird breeding events in Australia. In addition to water resources, the river red gum (Eucalyptus camaldulensis) forests, woodlands, common reed beds and water couch grasslands provide habitat for Macquarie Marshes, New South Wales. Source: B.Gray, DSEWPaC nationally threatened species such as the Australian painted snipe (Rostratula australis), superb parrot (Polytelis swainsonii) and Murray cod (Maccullochella peelii). Activities to improve the ecological character of the Macquarie Marshes included controlling weeds and invasive animals such as feral pigs and cats, foxes, European carp (Cyprinus carpio), and lippia (Phyla canescens), Noogoora burr (Xanthium pungens) and Bathurst burr (Xanthium spinosum) weeds. Various partners collaborated to deliver the project activities, including the NSW Department of Industry and Investment; Central West and North West Livestock Health and Pest Authorities; NSW Parks and Wildlife Service; and NSW Office of Environment and Heritage. Community and Indigenous engagement was important for raising awareness and maintaining the benefits associated with the activities undertaken. Landholders participated in pig shooting and received training in pig baiting and carp musters. Caring for our Country activities within the Macquarie Marshes exceeded targets to reduce pressures from key threats through weed and pest animal control and habitat restoration. It will take many years to detect noticeable impacts on the landscape; however, long-term annual monitoring regimes have been established and it can be reasonably concluded that reductions in the number of invasive species will contribute to sustaining the environmental values of the Ramsar site. Ongoing work will be required to prevent reinvasion of areas by these species and initial data analysis indicates that periodic grazing may be an effective technique for controlling lippia, an invasive weed. Improved grazing practices have been adopted by up to 20 landholders in 10-year management agreements, which will help ensure the future health of ground cover in the Ramsar wetland. Monitoring activities undertaken by the Central West Catchment Management Authority uncovered the presence of mimosa (Mimosa pigra), which enabled treatments to be implemented to QLD contain the highly invasive weed species. Macquarie Marshes Ramsar Wetland Macquarie Marshes ! Ramsar wetland The building of relationships and community SA NSW engagement was one of the highlights of the project oonamb C le and will be important for future management of the site. " For example, knowledge about weeds was increased VIC through weed control trials in partnership with the University of New England. It took years to develop Coonabarabran relationships with some local landholders and gain " their trust through consistent communication and involving them in decision making through membership 0 50 100 of the pig control steering committee. The lessons km learned from this project will inform future regional planning and projects by the Central West Catchment

Management Authority. Macquarie Marshes Ramsar site. Source: ERIN, DSEWPaC Gilgandra " Interlaken Ramsar wetland, Tasmania

In the Interlaken (Lake Crescent) Ramsar site in the central highlands of Tasmania, Caring for our Country matched Tasmanian Government funding contributions with $820 000 to implement a carp eradication program. The Inland Fisheries Service managed this program to protect the nationally endangered golden galaxias (Galaxias auratus) fish and conserve biodiversity and the ecological values of the Ramsar site. CASE STUDY

Interlaken Ramsar site. Source: J. Mollison, DSEWPaC Coastal Environments and Critical Aquatic Habitats Controlling carp populations in this catchment was a priority to prevent the species from spreading to other catchments in Tasmania. European carp is an invasive species across Australia and poses numerous problems for waterways by reducing water quality, damaging aquatic plants and out-competing native fish communities for food and habitat. Carp can also have economic impacts on commercial and recreational fisheries, farming and agriculture and treatment of domestic drinking water supplies. The Inland Fisheries Service Carp Management Program was recognised as being at the forefront of carp management technologies, with techniques and methodologies shared with local and state governments and regional bodies throughout Australia. One of the major strengths of the project was an inbuilt flexibility to adapt to new challenges.

A public education campaign supported the on-ground activities, including regular communication on the Inland Fisheries Service website and delivery of presentations to interest groups. The project established management protocols and partnerships with public and private agencies such as NRM South, Invasive Animals Cooperative Research Centre, Anglers Alliance Tasmania, Australian Fishing Tackle Association and Tasmania Land Conservancy.

A major challenge occurred with a carp spawning event in 2009, leading to a population increase.

Burnie-Somerset " Over 60 per cent of carp Devonport " from this spawning were

Launceston eradicated, with efforts " continuing to reduce these numbers in the final months of the program. Lessons Interlaken (Lake Crescent) Ramsar site learned and adaptation of the program prevented the occurrence of further spawning events through Hobart " techniques such as trapping, netting and radio tracking. These lessons will help inform carp management in other areas throughout 0 100 200 km Australia.

Interlaken (Lake Crescent) Ramsar site. Source: ERIN, DSEWPaC

23 Since 2008, Caring for our Country funded several Caring for our Country activities at Ramsar sites were projects that addressed identified threats to the aligned with existing management plans where possible ecological character of Ramsar-listed wetlands. and included: These projects assisted a range of government and non-government organisations and landholders to »» rehabilitating riparian and adjoining areas protect, restore and manage wetlands through »» controlling stock access on-ground activities, information gathering and »» managing weeds (including Weeds of National community engagement and capacity building. Significance) and pest animals Many of the Caring for our Country investments in the biodiversity and natural icons and Sustainable »» encouraging neighbouring landholders to adopt Farm Practices national priority areas also indirectly sustainable farming practices to improve the quality benefited Ramsar and non-Ramsar sites. Revegetation of water entering the wetlands and rehabilitation of degraded wetlands raised »» extension, education and community events community awareness of their importance and led »» improving land management and floodplain and to increased community involvement in protecting wetland planning. threatened ecological communities and species. In the Myall Lakes Ramsar site on the mid-north coast The Australian Government funds a ‘rolling review’ of of New South Wales, a Working on Country project Ramsar sites, which is partially funded by Caring for employed three teams of Indigenous rangers to focus our Country with $236 637. Through the review, states on cultural heritage and NRM activities, including and territories continue to develop site management cultural assessments, threatened species management, plans, Ecological Character Descriptions and transfer of Indigenous knowledge and improvements to monitoring and reporting regimes. The rolling review aquatic ecosystems. Their work plays an important role system allows the storage and retrieval of information in preserving and managing the unique environmental to address information and data gaps. It provides a and cultural values of the region. more accurate national snapshot of Australia’s Ramsar estate as well as valuable information and analysis across both spatial and temporal scales, which addresses reporting requirements for the Ramsar Convention and provides up-to-date operational information for site managers at various levels of government. A draft set of national indicators for wetland extent, distribution and condition has also been agreed and is being trialled. These monitoring and management tools will assist with managing important aquatic and coastal wetlands in the future. Peel–Yalgorup System Ramsar wetland, Western Australia

The Peel–Yalgorup Ramsar wetland is located 100 kilometres south of Perth. This important shorebird site and habitat for many ecologically significant species covers a total area of 26 530 hectares. The Peel–Yalgorup site is a large and diverse system of shallow estuaries, coastal saline lakes and CASE STUDY freshwater marshes, and comprises the most important area for waterbirds in south-west Australia. It supports a large number of waterbirds, invertebrates and estuarine and marine fish. Each year, tens of thousands of waterbirds gather at the site, many of which are protected under international migratory bird agreements. Feral animals and weeds pose key threats to the ecological character of the Peel–Yalgorup wetland and were targeted with Caring for our Country funding. Species of particular concern were foxes, feral cats, introduced fish and the cumbungi (Typha orientalis) weed. Coastal Environments and Critical Aquatic Habitats

Peel-Yalgorup System Ramsar site, Western Australia. Source: N. Sloane, DSEWPaC

The Yalgorup National Park Lakes wetlands include Lake Clifton, which is one of the few places in the world where living thrombolites occur in inland water. Thrombolites are underwater rock-like structures that are formed by microbial activity. They are actively growing and rely on an inflow of fresh groundwater that is rich in calcium and bicarbonate. In Lake Clifton, the thrombolites are considered to be over 2000 years old. The Peel–Yalgorup Ramsar wetland lies within Pinjarup country, a dialect group of the Nyoongar, and features hundreds of culturally significant sites, including artefacts, campsites, ceremonial sites, fish traps and skeletal remains. Through funding received from Caring for our Country, nine community groups were involved in monitoring and undertaking work to implement a management plan for the site. Strategic partnerships were also formed with two Western Australian Government departments. It is estimated that volunteers have performed more than 360 days of work through involvement in workshops, managing data, bird watching, planting days, weed removal and feral animal control. Invasive weed species have been controlled in more than 32 hectares and approximately 438 hectares have been managed for feral animals. Caring for our Country also provided $1.5 million to implement a Water Quality Improvement Plan for the Peel Inlet and Harvey Estuary, primarily to reduce the amount of nutrients and pollutants entering river systems through stormwater.

25 Outcome 3.2 Community engagement in these projects and improved monitoring and data collection led to increased community awareness about the Deliver actions that sustain the management of high ecological value aquatic environmental values of an additional ecosystems. 25 per cent of (non-Ramsar) priority coastal and inland high conservation value aquatic Caring for our Country prioritised investment in ecosystems [now known as high ecological 12 non-Ramsar aquatic ecosystems. The priority sites were identified by state and territory agencies and the value aquatic ecosystems] including, as a Australian Government based on: priority, sites in the Murray–Darling Basin. »» meeting criteria relating to international recognition, Under the National Water Initiative, the Australian diversity, distinctiveness, vital habitat, evolutionary Government committed to work with states and history, naturalness and representativeness territories to identify surface and groundwater systems » the necessity of urgent action to reduce key threats of high ecological value and to protect and enhance » and where there were good prospects for recovery these values through appropriate management plans. Since 2008, Caring for our Country has invested in »» sites which were located in the Murray–Darling a number of projects to address identified threats to Basin. the environmental values of these priority sites. Investments in the Murray–Darling Basin helped The initiative supported site managers to improve their increase Commonwealth investment in environmental management capacity, address significant threats water and assisted ecological restoration and water from invasive plant and animal species, improve land quality. Actions for addressing key threats were management practices and rehabilitate degraded applied at 95 per cent of priority sites and, on average, habitats and riparian corridors. On-ground works 90 per cent of the delivery targets were achieved included restriction of stock access and erosion at these sites, building a foundation for restoration control. It is recognised that ongoing work will be in future. In addition to the 12 prioritised sites, required to control invasive weeds and pest animals Caring for our Country invested in another such as rabbits, foxes and feral cats. 32 non-priority sites which were still identified as ecologically valuable ecosystems. Funded activities led to improved water quality, enhanced the condition of riparian vegetation, Caring for our Country projects to protect critical supported native in-stream ecology, increased aquatic ecosystems were most successful when habitat connectivity and protected threatened local communities and landholders were engaged species and ecological communities in and to manage invasive plants and pest animals, adjacent to the priority aquatic ecosystems. revegetate and rehabilitate degraded habitats and Projects that supported the protection of threatened riparian corridors, protect and manage threatened species included safeguarding nest sites of marine species and ecological communities and improve turtles and protecting the values of the Northern land management practices. Over five years, Holroyd Plain aquatic ecosystem in Cape York, local community actions helped to sustain and Queensland. improve the environmental values and water quality of coastal and inland critical aquatic ecosystems.

Non-Ramsar high ecological value aquatic ecosystems prioritised for investment Paroo River System, Lake Wyara, Lake Numalla and the Barwon–Darling River System (upstream of Bourke) Eulo Artesian Springs Supergroup (NSW and QLD)* and Northern Tributaries (NSW and QLD)* Lowbidgee Floodplain (NSW)* Cotter River (ACT)* Lower Ovens River System (VIC)* Lower Glenelg and Discovery Bay (VIC and SA) Derwent Estuary (TAS) Lower Snowy and Brodribb River Systems (VIC) Pike Mundic Wetland Complex (SA)* Chain of Bays (SA) Lake MacLeod (WA) Howard Sand Plains (NT) * Priority sites for investment in the Murray–Darling Basin. Lower Ovens River System high ecological value aquatic ecosystem, Victoria

In 2010–11, the North East Catchment Management Authority received $595 000 from Caring for our Country to reduce threats from invasive weeds and pest animals over 6500 hectares in the Lower Ovens River System. This ecosystem in the Murray–Darling Basin is a relatively intact and CASE STUDY functioning river floodplain with a natural flow regime and includes significant areas of river red gums (Eucalyptus camaldulensis).

The Lower Ovens has a high level of native fish species diversity and abundance. Through support from Caring for our Country, the Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research controlled European carp (Cyprinus carpio) with a combination of electrofishing, netting, fish traps and angling, removing 6.8 tonnes of the pest. A community carp muster angling competition attracted 179 volunteers. Reduction in carp biomass will assist native fish species such as the nationally protected trout cod Maccullochella( macquariensis) and Murray cod (Maccullochella peelii) to increase their habitat foothold and establish stronger populations.

With the participation of local landholders, a fox-baiting program on 3500 hectares of public and private land has reduced fox populations, which has supported the recovery of native animal and bird species. Coastal Environments and Critical Aquatic Habitats

In this project, weed control works were undertaken over 3000 hectares. Weeds of National Significance such as willows (Salix spp. except S. babylonica, S. x calodendron and S. x reichardtii), blackberry (Rubus fruticosus) and Montpellier broom (Cytisus scoparius) were treated and controlled. Improved management of 100 hectares of remnant vegetation was undertaken across five properties, including fencing and removal of pest plant species.

The weed and pest control activities have helped protect the environmental values of the Lower Ovens River System.

27 Derwent Estuary high ecological value aquatic ecosystem, Tasmania

The Derwent Estuary is an extensive river system which covers 8500 square kilometres and supports a range of habitats and species. Nearly 40 per cent of Tasmania’s population lives around the estuary’s margins and the Derwent is widely used for recreation, boating, recreational fishing, marine transportation CASE STUDY and industry. Further upstream, the Derwent River supplies the majority of the region’s drinking water supply and is a major source of hydro-electric power. The estuary has been identified as both a high ecological value aquatic ecosystem and a coastal hotspot due to the range of pressures impacting on these ecosystem services. Threats are from urban and industrial development as well as changes in catchment use, including heavy metal contamination, elevated nutrients and low dissolved oxygen levels, occasional sewage contamination, altered environmental flows and physical barriers to fish migration, invasive marine pests and weeds, and loss and degradation of estuarine habitat and species.

Caring for our Country provided the Tasmanian Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment with $1.37 million over three years to help implement the Derwent Estuary Program and Water Quality Improvement Plan to improve biodiversity and water quality in the Derwent Estuary from May 2009 to May 2012. The Derwent Estuary Program was implemented in partnership with local governments, industry and communities, successfully reducing water pollution and establishing monitoring regimes to measure pollutants and ecosystem responses.

Activities delivered with the support of Caring for our Country included groundwater remediation, improved stormwater management and dredging practices, mechanisms to reduce sediment run-off from building sites, targeted weed control and enhanced spawning habitat for the critically endangered spotted handfish (Brachionichthys hirsutus). Other nationally and internationally protected species to benefit from these works were migratory waders, seahorses and sea dragons, marine mammals, the nationally vulnerable Australian grayling (Prototroctes maraena), the migratory red-necked stint (Calidris ruficollis) and critically endangered lowland native grasses.

The involvement of various stakeholders and partners was instrumental in achieving project outcomes. One of the funded activities involved installing artificial substrates in spotted handfish habitat to assist with spawning: the majority of eggs were found on these substrates, demonstrating the importance of such interventions for the survival of the species. Monitoring was essential for measuring the success of recovery actions, revealing that populations at two sites were stable while fewer fish were observed at two other sites, indicating the seriousness of the threats facing this protected species.

As program needs and risks changed over time, the Derwent Estuary Program was adapted and sediment and erosion control inspections were delegated to council bodies to reduce the reliance on technical expertise from program officers. The changes in practices, restoration works and governance mechanisms will continue to have long-term benefits for the ecosystems within the Derwent Estuary.

Local project staff considered the most outstanding achievements of the project to be, firstly, the construction of a garden at the University of Tasmania which won an award for landscape architecture and has become a successful demonstration site; and, secondly, the raised awareness of water-sensitive urban design within the Tasmanian Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources, which contributed to the incorporation of the design into two bypass projects at Brighton and Kingston. Coastal Environments and Critical Aquatic Habitats

Spotted handfish.Source: B. D. Bruce

29 Anson Bay high ecological value aquatic ecosystem, Northern Territory

Two successive multi-year Caring for our Country projects were funded in the Anson Bay high ecological value aquatic ecosystem to enhance environmental values of the site and coordinate the control of mimosa (Mimosa pigra), a Weed of National Significance. Over $2 million was allocated to CASE STUDY these projects to manage weeds, reduce grazing pressures, control pest animals and revegetate habitat for significant flora and fauna. Anson Bay includes tidal flats, rainforest near the coastline, Peron Islands and adjoining seasonal floodplains of the Daly and Reynolds Rivers and Docherty Creek. The site is a mixture of pastoral properties and Indigenous freehold land run by a number of Indigenous Land Trusts. The coastal floodplains support waterbird breeding colonies and internationally significant migratory shore and waterbirds such as magpie geese (Anseranas semipalmata) and wandering whistling ducks (Dendrocygna arcuata). The coastline also contains important nesting sites for marine turtles and habitat for threatened species such as the northern quoll (Dasyurus hallucatus), water mouse (Xeromys myoides) and plant species. Pest animals and weeds, particularly feral pigs and mimosa, pose the greatest threats to the environmental values of the ecosystem. Considerable effort was invested in establishing relationships with pastoralists, involving local Indigenous ranger groups and developing resources to encourage knowledge retention in these groups even when there was a high turnover of individual rangers. Weed management projects in Anson Bay were coordinated by Territory NRM, with on-ground activities delivered in partnership with the Northern Territory Government, Thamarrurr, Asyrikkarrak Kirim, Woodycupaldiya and Malak Malak Ranger Groups, Wangamaty Land Management Group and the pastoral stations of Jindare and Tepperary Group of Stations. Traditional Owners were consulted about proposed works to eradicate mimosa and priority sites were selected for treatment of weed infestations with aerial spraying, ground spraying, and biological control. Buffer zones were also established to prevent weeds from spreading from eradicated areas. A weed strategy was prepared to coordinate efforts at the landscape scale and rangers were trained in control techniques, understanding of seed dynamics and recording of geo-spatial data. Education to identify mimosa was also delivered to school students. A core aspect of the project was implementing control measures that were suitable for local conditions and considering contingencies such as flooding and intermittent access. The prolonged wet season in 2011 delayed access to sites, although the monitoring undertaken to date highlights that weed treatments have been successful. Furthermore, pastoralists have benefited from improved land productivity after the removal of weeds. Other weed control projects are also being undertaken in areas adjacent to Anson Bay, which should assist with containing the spread of mimosa in future.

Wandering whistling-duck. Source: B. Furby, DSEWPaC Outcome 4 Caring for our Country invested in a number of coastal hotspot locations around Australia to reduce the impact of poor water quality on these critical coastal Improve the water quality management habitats. An independent review of coastal hotspot in the Gippsland Lakes in Victoria, the projects by eWater recognised several strengths of Tuggerah Lakes Estuary in New South the investments, including high levels of stakeholder Wales and all priority coastal hotspots. awareness and participation, the use of robust science to underpin plans and strategies and enhanced Australia’s coastal catchments provide critical aquatic capability in national and regional restoration. habitats for a number of plant and animal species, A priority coastal hotspot was identified as a coastal as well as having social, cultural and economic aquatic ecosystem that: values and supporting various recreational activities. Across Australia, these hotspots are impacted by poor »» had high ecological, social, cultural and/or water quality from a range of natural and anthropogenic recreational values disturbances and require better management and »» encompassed one or more matters of national protection to ensure that their ecological values and environmental significance protected under the integrity are maintained for future generations. EPBC Act Coastal environments are made up of intertidal zones, beaches, dune systems, estuaries, inlets and »» was under pressure from the impact of population growth and declining or poor water quality coastal wetlands, islands and reefs. Important coastal Coastal Environments and Critical Aquatic Habitats vegetation such as mangroves, coastal woodlands »» had an existing Water Quality improvement Plan and heathlands, near-shore coastal waters and areas or had one under development. immediately adjacent to coastal waters are highly susceptible to processes or activities that affect the coast and its values.

Corner Inlet coastal hotspot, Victoria

The Corner Inlet catchment occupies 600 square kilometres of the central portion of the South Gippsland drainage basin that surrounds and drains into the Corner Inlet Ramsar site in south-east Victoria. The area provides habitat for flora and migratory shorebird populations and also supports a significant fishing industry and water-based activities. Caring for our Country provided $450 000 over two years to

improve the water quality in this coastal hotspot. Local landholders were involved in efforts to fence and CASE STUDY revegetate riparian zones and adoption of new ways to manage dairy effluents and fertilise pastures. In the Agnes River catchment, farmers focused on riparian protection and gully stabilisation to prevent sediments and nutrients from entering drainage.

Churchill "

According to project staff, the greatest achievements in " this coastal hotspot project Leongatha " were the levels of buy-in from landholders for riparian Corner Inlet and erosion control works Coastal Water Quality Hotspot and the amount of native vegetation restored by these activities. With the assistance of the Victorian Department of Primary Industries, landholders prepared and VIC implemented effluent, nutrient Corner Inlet Coastal Water and fertiliser plans for dairy Quality Hotspot operations to prevent nutrient run-off into Corner Inlet.

0 25 50 km

Corner Inlet coastal hotspot. Source: ERIN, DSEWPaC

31 Under the former Natural Heritage Trust, the Coastal Catchments Initiative invested in the development of Water Quality Improvement Plans to promote nationally consistent water quality planning across Australia. These plans were guided by best practices outlined in the Australian Government’s National Water Quality Management Strategy and Framework for Marine and Estuarine Water Quality Protection. The foundations of the Natural Heritage Trust initiative were used to determine priority coastal hotspot sites for investment under Caring for our Country in partnership with state, territory and local governments and regional NRM organisations. It can be difficult to identify changes in water quality as a result of changed practices due to variable flows, climate factors and estuarine Botany Bay coastal hotspot, New South Wales. Source: J. Tomkins, DSEWPaC dynamics. However, investing in the implementation of appropriate planning frameworks had obvious benefits for water quality.

The coastal hotspots of the Gippsland Lakes in Victoria and Tuggerah Lakes Estuary in New South Wales were particularly prioritised for improving water quality management. On-ground works were undertaken to rehabilitate and revegetate these sites.

Darwin Harbour

NT

QLD

Moreton Bay

WA

SA Swan and Canning Estuaries NSW Great Lakes Peel Inlet and Harvey Estuary Hunter Estuary Port Waterways (Barker Inlet and Port River) Vasse-Wonnerup Botany Bay and Geographe Bay VIC Adelaide Coastal Waters Gippsland Lakes

0 500 1,000 2,000 Corner Inlet km Port Phillip Bay and Western Port

TAS

Derwent Estuary

Water quality coastal hotspots. Source: ERIN, DSEWPaC Gippsland Lakes, Victoria

The Gippsland Lakes is the largest coastal lagoon system in Australia and is internationally renowned as a Ramsar wetland. The system provides habitat for approximately 20 000 waterbirds and is an important centre for recreational water activities and commercial and recreational fishing. One of the major threats to the Gippsland Lakes is excessive nutrients entering the lake system as a result of rural and urban land use

practices, which can lead to algal blooms. CASE STUDY

Caring for our Country invested $5.25 million over three years for planning and on-ground actions to protect the environmental values of this significant wetland system by improving water quality, reducing nutrient inputs from public and private land and minimising the impacts of flooding problems for current and future developments through a flood mitigation program. The Gippsland Lakes Enhancement Program aimed to improve public and private land management practices in key areas, especially in the La Trobe, Moe and Macalister sub-catchments.

The Gippsland Nutrient Reduction Program, known as CORE 4, was delivered in partnership with the dairy industry in the La Trobe, Moe and Macalister districts to change farming practices and identify the best ways of engaging landholders. It involved 42 dairy farmers undertaking on-farm works and effluent management to reduce the amount of excess phosphorous and sediment entering the Gippsland Lakes. Farmers and Coastal Environments and Critical Aquatic Habitats landholders were exposed to a range of information on nutrient management and reduction strategies. Activities included expanding effluent ponds, establishing and extending effluent irrigation systems, conducting primary laneway works and increasing streambank management and fencing of wetlands.

CORE 4 demonstrated that the approach of farmers talking to other famers about their experiences is a very effective method of encouraging and obtaining acceptance of improved farm management practices. Farmers in the Macalister Irrigation District were assisted with improving irrigation efficiency to reduce excess run-off through irrigation farm planning, converting from flood-to-spray irrigation and constructing run-off dams to capture and re-use irrigation water. In this district, nutrient reduction plans were developed for 15 properties over 3000 hectares, 14 nutrient-reduction water re-use systems were installed and there were 11 nutrient-reduction flood-to-spray irrigation conversions.

Ecological monitoring at regular intervals and after events such as storms measured nutrient and sediment loads entering the lakes. In 2011, 62 per cent of water quality parameters were met and there was a minor algal bloom which had minimal economic impact. Monitoring data has assisted with the prioritisation of actions to improve water quality and will continue to guide future investment decisions.

Lake Tyers, Gippsland Lakes. Source: Y. Oren, DSEWPaC

33 Caring for our Country priority coastal hotspots Adelaide Coastal Waters including Port Waterways (SA) Hunter River Estuary (NSW) Botany Bay (NSW) Great Lakes (NSW) Gippsland Lakes (VIC) Corner Inlet (VIC) Port Phillip Bay and Western Port (VIC) Moreton Bay (QLD) Darwin Harbour (NT) Derwent Estuary (TAS) Peel Inlet and Harvey Estuary (WA) Swan Canning Estuary System (WA) Vasse-Wonnerup and Geographe Bay (WA)

The Caring for our Country initiative supported jurisdictions to improve their adaptive management capacity by developing Water Quality Improvement Plans and implementing actions identified in the plans. The plans included an ecosystem-based approach to integrated water cycle management and were designed to address key threats to water quality and environmental flows and deliver significant reductions in the discharge of pollutants to aquatic ecosystems. The development and implementation of Water Quality Improvement Plans is the responsibility of state and territory agencies.

In coastal hotspots projects funded by Caring for our Country, the main strategies to manage water quality and diffuse sources of pollution included Black-winged stilt. Source: B. Furby, DSEWPaC improving on-farm management practices, riparian restoration and stormwater management. Caring for our Country improved the protection and These strategies were supported by science and management of priority coastal hotspots by engaging had overall successful implementation with the community groups and landowners. Participants in involvement of local communities. Local community the coastal hotspots projects improved water quality groups were engaged in removing foreshore weeds in estuarine and coastal areas through activities such and litter to improve estuary and coastal habitat as removing foreshore weeds and litter to enhance health; revegetating and rehabilitating degraded the health of habitats; revegetating and rehabilitating areas to restore sensitive habitats; and improving degraded areas to restore sensitive habitats; and the management of catchments, urban and improving the management of run-off from catchments, stormwater run-off to enhance water quality in urban zones and stormwater. The significant natural, estuarine and coastal areas. social and economic values of these environments were protected through substantial investments and implementation of on-ground management actions. Tuggerah Lakes Estuary, New South Wales

The Tuggerah Lakes Estuary is situated on the central coast of New South Wales and consists of three interconnected coastal lagoons of Lake Munmorah, Budgewoi and Tuggerah Lake. Caring for our Country invested $20 million over five years to

implement an Estuary Management Plan in two stages as part of CASE STUDY a 2007 election commitment to continue improving and protecting water quality. The project was managed by a range of partnerships with the NSW Government, the Hunter–Central Rivers Catchment Management Authority, Landcare groups and local landholders. There was also Indigenous and youth participation in rehabilitation works, bush regeneration, workshops and school activities.

Activities funded by Caring for our Country in the Tuggerah Lakes included:

»» rehabilitating streambanks in Wyong River, Ourimbah Creek, Tumbi Creek and Wallarah/Spring Creek to reduce erosion and Coastal Environments and Critical Aquatic Habitats

strengthen banks Tuggerah Lakes, Ourimbah Creek. »» installing improved systems in residential and industrial areas Source: M.Tattersall to reduce excess stormwater run-off »» building constructed wetlands and catchment improvements to filter nutrients, sediments and stormwater run-off »» rehabilitating significant saltmarsh areas to assist with reducing ‘monosulfidic black ooze’—a substance in soil which can deoxygenate and acidify waterways »» improving recreational amenities and foreshores for communities »» continuing scientific investigations and monitoring of water quality »» engaging the community in education programs and providing information on the estuary and works programs.

" "

LAKE MUNMORAH

" Budgewoi

BUDGEWOI LAKE

" Gorokan

" Toukley

" Wyong TUGGERAH LAKE

NSW

Tuggerah Lakes Estuary

Tuggerah Lakes Estuary

" The Entrance

" Ourimbah

0 5 10 km

Tuggerah Lakes Estuary. Source: ERIN, DSEWPaC

35 Saltmarshes are a diminishing habitat in the coastal biosphere of New South Wales and several key locations around the Tuggerah Lakes were identified for rehabilitation and protection. One of the challenges entailed balancing competing interests of high ecological protection and public access and recreation. The overall project contributed to the rehabilitation of streambanks and saltmarsh ecological communities, monitoring and reporting of results and community engagement. An Ecological Response

Model modelled the movement of nutrients and enabled reporting through annual report cards, fact CONTINUED sheets and an interactive website. Monthly water quality monitoring also assisted with evaluating the achievement of outcomes, adapting the project to the conditions and communicating progress. Over 30 kilometres of key streambanks were revegetated to reduce the amount of sediment loads entering waterways and flushing into Tuggerah Lakes. A number of restoration techniques included using large CASE STUDY CASE STUDY woody debris and timber piles, installing open weave jute mesh to protect disturbed surfaces, laying down mulch to promote growth and protect exposed sodic soils, installing fencing at several locations, treating weeds, replanting at riparian areas, establishing sandstone rock structures and reshaping banks.

Works have progressed on reducing the impacts of Weeds of National Significance in areas surrounding the lakes, with all targets being exceeded. Blackberry (Rubus fruticosus), bitou bush or boneseed (Chrysanthemoides monilifera), lantana (Lantana camara) and bridal creeper (Asparagus asparagoides) were treated in riparian, wetland and saltmarsh areas. A further 5.7 hectares of saltmarsh and 2.5 hectares of wetland area have undergone passive rehabilitation, allowing native vegetation to regenerate and improve the natural ecological functioning of the treated areas. Vertebrate pest control continues in reserves surrounding the lakes, with this target also being exceeded.

As part of this project, many education and awareness-raising activities were held and there was good support from the local community. Hundreds of volunteers participated in the project and several community organisations were directly engaged. This engagement included ‘catchment crawl’ tours of the area, landholder workshops on rehabilitation techniques, weed control and ‘fish clinic’ workshops for disadvantaged groups to raise awareness about local fish species.

Formal and informal partnerships established through the Tuggerah Lakes project resulted in a detailed monitoring and evaluation program to assess impacts. Local Wyong Council staff received specialised training through a partnership with the neighbouring Great Lakes Council, increasing their capacity to deliver environmental outcomes. Modelling conducted by the NSW Office of Environment and Heritage had the additional benefit of strengthening the community education and awareness elements of the project. Lessons learned during the first stage of the project were the advantages of increasing the involvement of partners and the importance of building in sufficient flexibility within contracts to adapt to weather and other unpredictable events. Botany Bay coastal hotspot, New South Wales

Botany Bay is an ecologically significant catchment, as it provides habitat for many migratory and endangered species and communities, contains Ramsar wetlands such as Towra Point Nature Reserve, has cultural heritage and supports recreational and water-based activities. The two main sub-catchments within Botany Bay are the Georges River and the Cooks River. A project to improve water quality in the

Botany Bay coastal hotspot between 2009 and 2011 received $1.58 million in funding from Caring for CASE STUDY our Country.

Two major achievements of the project included the establishment of a Water Quality Improvement Plan, a catchment-scale decision support system to support water-sensitive urban design and a monitoring network to track progress and refine catchment models. This component of the work attracted significant co-funding from grantees, bringing the total value of the work to $3.2 million. The project also helped proponents in Sydney to secure $10 million in funding from NSW urban sustainability grants.

Caring for our Country funding was used to implement on-ground works, including:

»» installation of bio-retention systems to treat 18 hectares of residential stormwater in Strathfield,

Rockdale, Hurstville, Bankstown City and City of Sydney council areas Coastal Environments and Critical Aquatic Habitats »» installation of pollutant traps to treat 196 hectares of residential and commercial stormwater in Fairfield and Sutherland Shire Councils, the City of Canterbury and Centennial Parklands »» a stormwater harvesting and re-use project to capture stormwater over 27 hectares to be used at the Crest Sporting Complex in Bankstown.

Towra Point Nature Reserve. Source: D. Chapman, DSEWPaC

37 Hunter River Estuary coastal hotspot, New South Wales

The Hunter River Estuary comprises an area of more than 20 000 square kilometres and the river itself covers a distance of 467 kilometres. The estuary CASE STUDY contains internationally significant Ramsar wetlands which provide important habitat for migratory birds and threatened species and ecological communities. The Lower Hunter region is part of a climatic transition zone for many plant and animal species between the subtropical north and cooler south. The estuary is also valued for fishing, agriculture, tourism, recreation and Indigenous heritage.

Caring for our Country provided funding to improve Hunter estuary wetlands coastal hotspot, water quality in the Hunter River Estuary coastal New South Wales. Source: S. Stuart-Smith, DSEWPaC hotspot. The project has enhanced water quality primarily through rehabilitation and restoration activities to mitigate the impacts of acid sulfate soil. A novel floodgate system was installed to flush and neutralise wetland areas prone to acidity from exposed acid sulfate soils. This system had immediate benefits, with waterbirds quickly recolonising an additional 100 hectares. The ability to manage water levels in Ramsar-listed wetlands allowed for rehabilitation of critical habitat for various migratory bird species that are protected by international agreements, such as the eastern great egret (Ardea modesta). Water levels were controlled by installing pipes, pumps and penstock gates. Sediment and nutrient pollution from rural and urban areas was also addressed as a secondary activity.

The greatest legacies of the project were the changes in work culture and practices and a willingness by a wide range of organisations to participate in NRM. Seventy per cent of farmers who were involved in the carbon farming and sustainable grazing component of the project have changed the way they manage their land and made personal investments in carbon farming. Some stakeholders who had never previously been involved in NRM are now enthusiastic contributors.

Tamworth "

QLD

Port Macquarie "

SA Hunter Estuary Coastal Water Quality Hotspot

NSW

Taree " VIC Hunter Estuary Coastal Water Quality Hotspot

Forster-Tuncurry " Muswellbrook "

Singleton "

Maitland " " Cessnock-Bellbird Raymond Terrace " " Kurri Kurri-Weston

Newcastle "

0 75 150

" km Central Coast Lithgow " " Hunter River Estuary coastal hotspot. Source: ERIN, DSEWPaC

" Swan Canning Estuary System coastal hotspot, Western Australia

The Swan Canning catchment comprises 2126 square kilometres and includes much of the Perth metropolitan area. The river is used extensively by the community and is important for its aesthetic, recreational, commercial and environmental values. The diverse aquatic ecosystems and riparian CASE STUDY vegetation of this estuarine system have a range of important environmental values. Nationally protected fauna in the estuary include bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) and the critically endangered western swamp tortoise (Pseudemydura umbrina).

Caring for our Country provided funding to reduce excessive nitrogen and phosphorous levels in the Swan Canning river system. This funding was complemented with $3.19 million from the Western Australian Government. Activities included biophysical rehabilitation, urban and rural landholder education, an awareness campaign targeting school students Coastal Environments and Critical Aquatic Habitats and a program to increase the number of volunteers. A ‘dolphin watch’ program, involving hundreds of participants, was very successful at engaging local communities to observe dolphins as an indicator of Western swamp tortoise. Source: S. Wilson estuary health.

Following the implementation of two successful nutrient management programs, managers of urban open spaces are now in a better position to reduce the use of nitrogen and phosphorus in the coastal hotspot. The ‘Fertilise Wise’ program trained local land managers to reduce their use of fertilisers in green open spaces, while horse owners in rural areas were targeted with an extension program to promote the better management of waste from horse farms.

One of the main achievements of this project was increased awareness and community and regulator acceptance of an innovative soil strategy, which involved adding artificial materials to soils to improve their nutrient absorption and retention capacity. The project created a framework that could be used for regulation of this new approach to soil and increased knowledge about implementing it. As a result of this project, there is now more active community interest in the estuary.

NT

Ellenbrook " WA

SA Swan and Canning Estuaries Coastal Water Quality Hotspot

Perth "

0 25 50 km Swan and Canning Estuaries Coastal Water Quality Hotspot

Kwinana " Swan Canning Estuary System coastal hotspot. Source: ERIN, DSEWPaC

"

39 Vasse Wonnerup and Geographe Bay coastal hotspot, Western Australia

The Vasse Wonnerup and Geographe Bay catchment has a high abundance and richness of waterbirds, including the nationally protected black-winged stilt (Himantopus himantopus) and red-necked avocet (Recurvirostra novaehollandiae). The hotspot includes highly diverse sponge, coral and invertebrate CASE STUDY communities. It also has cultural and heritage values and supports fishing and recreation.

The project received funding from Caring for our Country to improve water quality in the Vasse Wonnerup and Geographe Bay coastal hotspot. The project implemented fertiliser and riparian management techniques such as establishing urban bio-retention wetlands, controlling stock access to waterways and retrofitting high-risk industrial areas with bio-retention rain-gardens and upgrading major drains. These activities were supported by extensive and ongoing monitoring and modelling in the catchment and engagement with rural, business and school communities to increase awareness of the values of Geographe Bay. Some of the bio-retention gardens Kwinana " Byford have become demonstration sites to raise awareness about the benefits of water-sensitive " urban design. Baldivis " The successful Bay-OK marketing program for urban gardens will also become the flagshipRockingham for all water " quality activities in future.

Another highlight of the project was Mandurah " Pinjarra the activities completed by farmers " as part of the Smart Soils program. Eighty farmers were involved in monitoring and mapping NT their soils and then creating nutrient management plans. The high level of engagement is particularly Harvey WA " commendable, as improving water SA quality is not generally the core Vasse-Wonnerup and Geographe Bay business of farmers. Coastal Water Quality Hotspot

Bunbury Collie " " Within a five-year monitoring cycle there has been a decrease in nutrients in the Vasse Wonnerup Dunsborough system, which can be attributed to " Busselton " the successful implementation of Vasse-Wonnerup and Geographe Bay on-ground works. This decrease Coastal Water Quality Hotspot is significant, as there is usually a long delay between implementing Margaret River " Bridgetown on-ground works and detecting " noticeable improvements. Natural resource managers in the region believe that the project Manjimup is a useful example for explaining " the science to communities and Vasse Wonnerup and Geographe Bay, Western Australia. Source: ERIN, DSEWPa other stakeholders. 0 50 100 km Coastal Environments and Critical Aquatic Habitats

Glenelg Hopkins NRM region, Merri River Estuary, Victoria. Source: J. Baker, DSEWPaC

41 Outcome 5 Establishing networks and partnerships provided access points for engaging new audiences in protecting and rehabilitating coastal and aquatic environments. Increase the community’s participation Partnerships fostered increased participation rates in protecting and rehabilitating coastal through a diverse range of activities and more environments and critical aquatic habitats. coordinated approaches with consistent advice. Paid staff and facilitators played an essential role in Caring for our Country supported almost 600 projects developing and maintaining networks and partnerships. which engaged around 6300 community groups in Successful partnerships tended to clearly articulate protecting, restoring and conserving coastal and roles and responsibilities and share knowledge. critical aquatic habitats. On-ground actions comprised In the Ramsar estate, almost 100 projects across removing marine debris and rehabilitating waterways, Australia engaged land managers, Indigenous and wetlands and marine habitats. Participants included community groups and volunteers to protect the Indigenous communities, Landcare and Coastcare ecological values of around 1.75 million hectares of groups, schools, local governments and volunteers. Ramsar wetlands through on-ground actions such Community participation was particularly targeted as reducing the impact of invasive animals and through Community Action Grants (CAGs) and grants weeds, rehabilitating native habitat and improving through regional base-level funding allocated to land management practices. In addition, 27 projects regional NRM organisations. CAGs provided small engaged local landholders and communities to grants to community groups to undertake projects address threats to the environmental values of around with a focus on protecting and improving local natural 100 000 hectares of coastal and inland critical aquatic resources and environmental assets. Direct funding ecosystems. Actions helped improve water quality increased the participation of Indigenous, urban and and protected threatened species and ecological regional communities in the protection and rehabilitation communities. Caring for our Country also worked of aquatic and coastal environments. with local landholders to implement management plans to control nutrient flows so that water quality in the Tuggerah Lakes in New South Wales could Increasing the participation rates of communities be improved. in coastal environments and critical aquatic habitats was achieved in several ways: Building knowledge and skills of urban and regional communities was central to achieving increased »» establishing networks and partnerships participation in many Caring for our Country coastal »» building knowledge and skills and aquatic projects. Raising awareness and knowledge of the significance of local assets, and »» providing incentives building skills to manage threatening processes »» establishing new community NRM groups to these assets, generated increased community »» expanding and diversifying existing NRM participation in the initiative. The ability to address groups complex NRM issues over broad areas is strongly dependent on communities having appropriate »» implementing on-ground works. skills and knowledge. Through the Caring for our Country initiative, knowledge and skills were built in various ways, including through formal and informal educational opportunities such as forums, training, workshops, field days, working bees, social events, mentoring and general communication. A range of organisations facilitated these activities, particularly Coastcare groups, catchment management authorities, non-government organisations and local councils. Participation in events and projects had the unintended social outcome of enhancing connectivity within communities. Glenelg Alliance, Victoria

The Glenelg Alliance was a successful collaboration between multiple partners to address threats from invasive plants and animals and rehabilitate waterways within the Lower Glenelg and Discovery Bay high ecological value aquatic ecosystem in Victoria. Caring for our Country provided funding for stakeholder engagement and on-ground works in this region. The ecosystem supports a number of nationally

threatened species, including the endangered Australasian bittern (Botaurus poiciloptilus), and contains CASE STUDY important breeding sites for various shorebirds as well as providing drought refuge for various aquatic and riparian species.

The Glenelg Alliance was composed of the Glenelg Hopkins Catchment Management Authority, the Victorian Departments of Sustainability and Environment and Primary Industries, Parks Victoria and the Glenelg Shire Council. Conservation Volunteers Australia also engaged with private and public landholders, including farmers and Gunditj Mirring Traditional Owners, to undertake environmental works.

The formation of the alliance and strong collaboration between agencies and local landholders achieved increased participation rates and positive biophysical outcomes in a nationally significant region of south-west Victoria. By the third year of the Caring for our Country project, the majority of targeted landholders had been engaged in an area with previously low participation. A lasting impact of the project is stronger relationships Coastal Environments and Critical Aquatic Habitats and cooperation to address some difficult and extensive problems relating to pest animals, weeds and agricultural practices.

Economic and social incentives also generated increased engagement and participation in activities “Because of the Caring for our Country to protect and rehabilitate coastal and aquatic funding, the Victorian Government environments. Economic incentives could take the eventually decided to invest in the form of grants, subsidies, stewardship payments or project. This would not have happened competitive tenders, while social incentives could be without Caring for our Country”— recognition, training or social networking activities. project manager, Coastal communities Where appropriate, incentives encouraged innovation or protecting beach-nesting birds, VIC. assisted landholders to adopt practices that may have been economically infeasible. Economic incentives were generally most effective when combined with other approaches, including social incentives and Another strategy for increasing participation in building knowledge or skills. The Reef Rescue program activities was the establishment of new voluntary involved successful partnerships between industry community-based NRM groups. It was important groups and regional NRM organisations. To date, it has that these groups were self-directed and had strong supported more than 2900 individual land managers to community ownership. These groups provided a adopt improved land management practices, including non-threatening and local forum for community ground cover management to reduce the discharge of members and distributed information, skills, technical dissolved nutrients, sediment and chemicals into the expertise and financial support to target issues of Great Barrier Reef. Regional delivery partners advise shared importance. For example, two new Coastcare that to date, for every $1 provided through Reef Rescue, groups were formed through one project in the Eyre participating landholders contribute an average of Peninsula to protect shorebirds. Community-based approximately $1.80 in in-kind funding. groups were able to mobilise volunteers and engage new volunteers where required.

43 Coastal communities protecting beach-nesting birds, Victoria

Caring for our Country funding contributed to the ongoing implementation of a long-term project in Victoria by BirdLife Australia which aimed to protect CASE STUDY Australian shorebirds such as hooded plovers (Thinornis rubricollis), red-capped plovers (Charadrius ruficapillus) and the beach stone-curlew (Esacus magnirostris). These birds are nationally protected under the EPBC Act as marine species.

The project raised public awareness about beach-nesting birds, trained local volunteers to monitor the birds, managed threats and researched new ways to protect the species and improve breeding success. Meetings were held with land managers and volunteers to share data and information and to report on progress of recovery efforts. Training workshops were offered to increase the capacity of volunteers and management agencies to monitor, identify threats and implement on-ground management strategies such as fencing and identifying predator tracks around nests. As a result, 384 nesting sites were fenced and Increasing public awareness about hooded plovers. over 8250 people were engaged in the project. Source: Birdlife Australia

The involvement of community groups and monitoring has resulted in the collection of greater amounts of data, with evidence that there has been improved breeding success among the targeted beach-nesting birds.

Adult and juvenile hooded plovers. Source: Birdlife Australia Coastal Environments and Critical Aquatic Habitats

Chick shelter, beach-nesting birds project. Source: Birdlife Australia

45 Catchment to coast—managing and restoring environmental values in the Cygnet River, South Australia

Caring for our Country funding of $2.11 million across three projects provided financial incentives based on CASE STUDY equitable cost-sharing agreements for farmers to adopt practice changes in the Cygnet River catchment on Kangaroo Island in South Australia. These incentives led to a substantial increase in participation of farmers and uptake of on-ground works and practices such as fencing waterways and improving grazing and soil management. The aim of the project was to improve water quality and seagrass cover and condition by reducing the amount of sediment and nutrients running into the river and

Nepean Bay. Southern brown bandicoot. Source: D. Watts The Cygnet River contains a number of important biodiversity assets, including remnant river red gum “From property visits, it is clear that (Eucalyptus camaldulensis) communities, threatened plants and habitat for the nationally endangered glossy landowners are increasingly looking black cockatoo (Calyptorhynchus lathami halmaturinus), at the triple bottom line in evaluating Kangaroo Island dunnart (Sminthopsis aitkeni) and whether to undertake on-ground works. southern brown bandicoot (Isoodon obesulus obesulus). This means that a suite of works with a The engagement of farmers led to improvements in range of private and public benefits is terrestrial and aquatic habitats and water quality and needed to continue to attract landholders prevented the degradation of seagrass meadows in to these programs”—program manager. Nepean Bay.

Caring for our Country supported existing groups to expand their social engagement to reach new audiences and diversify their activities to address new and emerging threats to coastal environments and critical aquatic habitats. Funding was provided to capitalise on existing momentum and active involvement in community groups like Coastcare.

New audiences included schools, Indigenous communities and urban residents. By expanding the engagement, the existing capacity to deliver NRM was boosted. A culture of peer mentoring developed in many communities, with more experienced community members or farmers offering information and support to others.

Myall Lakes wetland, New South Wales. Source: B. Gray, DSEWPaC Water quality improvements in the Great Lakes —a community partnership, New South Wales

The Great Lakes are located on the mid-north coast of NSW and include the catchments and estuaries of Wallis Lake, Smiths Lake and Myall CASE STUDY Lakes. These wetlands have been designated a water quality coastal hotspot and are ecologically significant, providing habitat and drought refuge for a diverse number of native flora and fauna species, including large numbers of waterbirds. Parts of the wetlands are subject to international migratory bird agreements. The Myall Lakes are also a Ramsar wetland and support significant oyster, fishing, tourism and recreation industries: it is estimated that the area produces one-third of Myall Lakes wetland, New South Wales. Source: B. Gray, DSEWPaC Australia’s oyster harvest. Coastal Environments and Critical Aquatic Habitats Through the Coastal Catchments Initiative, Caring for our Country provided $1.24 million to implement components of the Water Quality Improvement Plan developed by the Great Lakes Council. With this funding, wetlands were protected and enhanced, native riparian vegetation was regenerated and sustainable grazing management was introduced. A new capability for managing water quality was formed and benchmarks were established to enable managers to measure changes in future. The greatest legacies of the project are the sustainable farms and urban gardens groups, along with the development of relationships and building of capacity to undertake restoration works with improved knowledge, tools and planning instruments. Funding assisted Great Lakes Council to engage rural and urban communities to protect the health of the region’s waterways from pollutants such as run-off; stock; agricultural chemicals; vegetation clearing; erosion and sedimentation; and boating, fishing and aquaculture. The proponent dedicated great effort to understanding the needs and interests of different communities. In total, 569 individuals from across the region participated. Farmers were equipped with knowledge and skills to manage their land sustainably to minimise impacts on waterways and maximise productivity. Funding supported the establishment and ongoing facilitation of eight sustainable farming groups. The groups met on a quarterly basis to share knowledge and learn from one another. Educational activities also provided practical experience with best-practice farm demonstration sites, farm trials, field days and workshops. A sustainable farming incentive scheme offered funding opportunities to assist with implementing new practices such as waterway protection and sustainable grazing. Another aspect of the project was the assistance provided to urban residents to create productive and organic gardens which would have minimal impact on water quality. Forty-one local residents took part, meeting monthly for 12 months to learn about propagation, water use, fertiliser, chemicals and composting. The educational activities were strongly influenced by adult learning principles, including recognising the knowledge and experience of participants, encouraging learning from others, participant-directed learning and offering activities that were locally relevant and action oriented. These activities have generated shifts in attitudes and behaviours on farms and in backyards, ultimately protecting water quality within the region. After learning new knowledge, many participants did change management practices and were more willing to try new things. The social nature of the project also created a stronger sense of community, which resulted in the development of personal friendships and networks of like-minded people. Positive social interactions increased the likelihood that participants will continue to engage with NRM programs in future. The Great Lakes Council is assisting the participants to establish themselves as independent community groups who will continue to work together, focusing on developing leadership skills and sourcing funding. Participants in the project are well prepared to meet the long-term challenge to improve water quality. As a result of the effective participation program, rural and urban landholders will continue to undertake and maintain sustainable practices on their properties through strong neighbourhood-scale networks established to sustain the localised neighbourhood groups.

47 Partnerships protecting sea turtles, Queensland

With a Community Action Grant of $6405 from Caring for our Country, NQ Dry Tropics cooperated with the Sea Turtle Foundation, Gudjuda Traditional Owners, Queens Beach Action Group and Digital Dimensions to help protect sea turtles in far north Queensland. There are six marine turtle species that are protected as either endangered or vulnerable under the EPBC Act. This project brought together a diverse group of

stakeholders with different perspectives on managing turtles. A community-based facilitator was the key CASE STUDY driver of the project, facilitating collaboration with regular communication in the form of emails, newsletters and meetings. The facilitator was known and trusted by the stakeholder groups and had an in-depth understanding of the objectives and issues of each group.

Since the project was completed, a Whitsunday Marine Turtle Group has been established, which includes representatives from each major stakeholder group. This body has developed a draft Turtle Management Plan which aims to foster a more integrated approach to managing turtles as well as share and document current knowledge from the various stakeholders. Communities are being consulted about the draft plan. “We have passionate and enthusiastic people in the community but they did not know how to direct their effort, and through this project we have been able to really understand the motivation of all groups and help them find common ground to coordinate activities (to protect sea turtles) in an effective and efficient way”—former project manager.

Green turtle. Source: Fusion Films, DSEWPaC Coastwest/Coastcare: engaging communities in caring for the coast, Western Australia

There is strong community interest in protecting the coastline of Western Australia. Caring for our Country provided a funding boost of $1.5 million to the existing Coastwest program administered by the Western Australian Department of Planning. The funding assisted community groups to work in partnership with land CASE STUDY managers to undertake rehabilitation and conservation activities.

The Western Australian coastline stretches over 24 000 kilometres. Its range of unique and diverse values is confronted with a number of challenges as a result of climate change, population growth, competing uses and degradation. The original Coastwest program commenced in 1995 and provided communities with opportunities to be involved in coastal management and engage with state government agencies.

Funding contributed to a state-wide and competitive coastal grants scheme to protect environmental values, aesthetic qualities, biodiversity and water quality, as well as building community capacity to deliver environmental works. The grants application process is simple for community groups to access and the competitive nature of the scheme generates high-quality projects that are targeted at local and regional coastal priorities. Coastal Environments and Critical Aquatic Habitats

Funding also supported five regional NRM groups to deliver and promote the Coastwest program through increasing community engagement and the number of volunteers; providing support and educational materials to community groups; and fostering partnerships between government agencies, community groups, land managers and Indigenous groups. Support from the program has assisted over 50 community groups to expand their influence. The program engaged new audiences that had not previously been involved in coastal management activities. As a result of Caring for our Country investments, a strong network of coastal facilitators were employed and they built the capacity of community groups, delivered knowledge and information and linked the groups with state agencies and NRM bodies.

Coastwest volunteers, clean up crew. Source: Coastwest

49 Caring for our Coast, New South Wales

Caring for our Coast was a $4.8 million Caring for our Country project which offered grants to all coastal “It is so important to understand communities in New South Wales to build their capacity a particular community before to rehabilitate and conserve coastal environments. community engagement

The project was managed by the Northern Rivers mechanisms are employed. CASE STUDY Catchment Management Authority and delivered The grants have provided groups in partnership with Hunter–Central Rivers, with some professional level training Hawkesbury–Nepean and Sydney Metropolitan and to help monitor their outcomes on the Southern Rivers Catchment Management Authorities. environment—this will help them to The grants program targeted established NRM groups make better decisions on management where there was existing capacity and interest in and intervention into the future”— delivering activities, such as Dunecare, Landcare and project manager. Coastcare groups.

A variety of on-ground activities such as weeding, planting, erosion control fencing, mapping of weeds and vegetation, planning, engagement and educational activities were delivered. Participation by established groups supported the strengthening of capacity through access to training and the recruitment of new members and volunteers. Capacity building will assist with future management of the project sites and ongoing participation in NRM programs.

Coastal environments are faced with significant Community groups and regional NRM organisations pressures from declining water quality, climate often offered opportunities to participate in on-ground change, dune erosion, habitat loss, land clearing works. Community groups were engaged in and increasing traffic in ports and marinas. 83 Caring for our Country projects to improve the Caring for our Country projects provided opportunities protection and management of priority coastal hotspots. for individuals to get involved in delivering on-ground Increasing community participation is important for works to address these threats: a practical element protecting coastal areas, especially as they cover vast which encouraged participation. The physical and stretches of land. One project in southern Tasmania practical nature of these works provided an immediate identified priority areas for establishing new Coastcare sense of contribution and involvement. The social groups. On the Goolwa coast of South Australia, element also enabled participants to build new networks $50 000 from Caring for our Country supported and facilitated the transfer of knowledge and skills. coordination to boost volunteer-based conservation In the Gippsland Lakes, farmers were engaged activities such as working bees, awareness-raising to improve on-farm nutrient and dairy effluent and development of new resources. Long-standing management and adopt irrigation practices such as community groups were mobilised to undertake flood-to-spray conversion and drainage capture or actions to protect the Goolwa coastal zone near the water re-use systems. Recognition of volunteers and mouth of the Murray River. Actions comprised weed community organisations was essential for maintaining and erosion control, fencing for dune stabilisation, ongoing enthusiasm and participation, acknowledging signage and revegetating with coastal plants. the value of their contributions and celebrating The area contains significant roosting and feeding achievements. Recognition could also take the form habitat for the critically endangered orange-bellied of references to prospective employers and providing parrot (Neophema chrysogaster) as well as professional development opportunities. high-quality remnant vegetation which supports other flora and fauna. In this project, coastal information was disseminated via signage and a Goolwa Coastcare website and Facebook page. Partnerships with the South Australian Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, the Ngarrindjeri Regional Authority and Alexandrina Council helped to leverage funds to expand on-ground works. Filling the gaps for Coastcare communities in southern Tasmania

The Southern Coastcare Association of Tasmania received $536 270 from Caring for our Country to continue to support Coastcare groups and individual volunteers by providing opportunities and resources to help them participate in coastal management in southern Tasmania. CASE STUDY

“The handbook includes information that we have learned over the last 10 years, some of which has been ground-truthed and some that is purely a community perspective”—project manager.

A flexible program supported coastal groups and organisations to address local priorities while also providing leadership to identify and Coastal Environments and Critical Aquatic Habitats address emerging issues and community needs. The proponent worked with over 67 groups and organisations on a range of coastal priorities, including biodiversity conservation through habitat restoration and invasive plant and animal control, managing coastal erosion through shoreline protection works and engaging more broadly with communities.

The Southern Coastcare Association of Tasmania adopted a range of different approaches to community engagement depending on the target audience. As a result of this project, the Coastcare capacity-building handbook was updated to document the engagement approaches. The handbook was developed as a resource for other groups and provides useful case studies Barilla Bay, south Tasmania. Source: N. Rains and tips for engagement.

Increasing community participation through Caring for our Country projects was critical to protecting and rehabilitating coastal environments and critical aquatic habitats. Many projects depended on volunteers for on-ground implementation or required engagement to change attitudes and practices. Participation was increased through a variety of mechanisms and a partnership approach, providing mutual benefits and incentives to participants. Community participation in coastal and aquatic projects has important legacies for the future protection of rivers, wetlands and estuaries: new groups were formed, community groups experienced renewed vision and momentum and capacity was built through the development of knowledge and skills by participants. These factors Artificial wetland at Tidbinbilla Nature Reserve, Australian Capital Territory. Source: G. Comfort, DSEWPaC establish a solid foundation for long-term protection of coastal and aquatic environments.

51 Continued investment in Urban streams and estuaries are connected to coastal and marine resources, and investing in restoration Australia’s urban and coastal works to urban waterways will contribute to improved aquatic habitats—Phase II resilience of these assets and improve the liveability Caring for our Country of cities. Further information about the next phase of Caring for our Country is available at: www.nrm.gov.au/ 2013–2018 about/caring/prospectus.html.

The Australian Government will continue to invest in In the next phase of Caring for our Country, funding activities that further protect Australia’s urban waterways will also be used to build community capacity. and coastal environments by targeting environmental It is acknowledged that many coastal and aquatic threats and priorities in specific key areas across environments have significance for Indigenous people Australia. These environments provide essential and partnerships are essential for implementing ecosystem services that support local communities and activities to protect ecological, cultural and spiritual economies, and protecting these values is essential for values. The initiative will continue to fund activities the ongoing economic and social wellbeing of urban that address identified key threats to the ecological and coastal communities. Climate change, expanding character of priority Ramsar-listed wetlands, helping populations and economic development will all place meet Australia’s commitments under the Ramsar pressures on species and ecosystems in the future. Convention. Over the next five years, Caring for our The heavy concentration of populations around Country will continue to support the development Australia’s iconic coastlines and rivers has significant and adoption of improved technologies and land impacts on these environments in the form of management techniques to reduce critical threats to, increased effluent and nutrients, erosion and and improve and restore, the ecological character modification of habitats. of Ramsar sites and high ecological value aquatic ecosystems. Funding will also be allocated to increase The Sustainable Environment stream of the second capacity to manage these environments in a way that phase of Caring for our Country will be guided by is adaptive to changing conditions, is integrated across strategic objectives, including maintaining ecosystem natural resource sectors and incorporates landscape- services and protecting Australia’s conservation scale approaches. Furthermore, Ramsar wetlands estate. In particular, restoring and maintaining urban are an important foundation for building landscape waterways and coastal environments will be prioritised. connectivity in the National Wildlife Corridors Plan.

Overview of the Caring for our Country Sustainable Environment stream Strategic objectives Investment themes

Maintenance of ecosystem »» protecting the Great Barrier Reef services, including ecological »» conserving and protecting species and ecosystems (matters of national and cultural values, now and environmental significance) into the future »» restoring and maintaining urban waterways and coastal environments »» building NRM community skills, knowledge and engagement Protection of our »» building the National Reserve System conservation estate »» protecting Ramsar sites and values »» protecting World Heritage sites’ outstanding universal value and integrity »» building NRM community skills, knowledge and engagement Enhanced capacity of »» building Indigenous peoples’ capacity for NRM Indigenous communities to »» building NRM community skills, knowledge and engagement conserve and protect natural resources Future Caring for our Country priorities for coastal and »» rehabilitation activities, including restoration of urban environments include: wetlands, mangroves and riverbank vegetation which play a vital role in filtering water running into »» working with local governments, regional NRM the reef and provide valuable habitats to support organisations and relevant industries to reduce the biodiversity amount of pollution entering waterways »» measures that improve the quality of water run-off »» supporting the trial, testing and piloting of innovative from urban and industrial lands. river and wetland health technologies Climate change will increasingly impact on the reef in »» implementing urban ecosystem improvements future as a result of higher sea surface temperatures such as constructed wetlands, bio-retention basins, and acidity levels, leading to the destruction of sediment basins, infiltration systems and buffer ecosystems through coral bleaching. To maximise the strips resilience of the Great Barrier Reef to these climate »» implementing erosion control technologies such change impacts, the Australian Government is working as riparian restoration to reduce run-off in urban with key stakeholders to reduce the impacts of other catchments stressors such as exposure to increased levels of »» supporting local communities to manage, protect sediments, nutrients and pesticides from agricultural and restore urban and coastal biodiversity and run-off that affect the health and resilience of inshore habitats and improve the connectivity of fragmented reefs and seagrasses. Coastal Environments and Critical Aquatic Habitats ecosystems The Australian Government will continue to work »» implementing projects that reduce degradation and with existing and new delivery partners to ensure that restore habitat around urban waterways to protect the objectives of coastal and aquatic habitats are near-shore waters from run-off and other pollutants achieved, recognising that protecting and conserving »» developing and implementing more targeted Water the environment is a shared responsibility. Quality Improvement Plans in high priority urban Indigenous partners will be supported to manage catchments significant environmental and cultural values of land and sea country in places such as the Kimberley in »» supporting activities to reduce land-based sources Western Australia and Cape York in Queensland. of marine debris in urban coastline communities The successful Working on Country stream of Caring »» developing and implementing land and sea country for our Country will continue to contribute to national management plans that complement and support and international commitments on biodiversity and the corridor and NRM regional plans in the protection advancement of Indigenous peoples, including Closing and management of biodiversity. the Gap on Indigenous disadvantage. The number of The Australian Government is committed to extending Working on Country ranger positions will be expanded the Reef Rescue program for another five years and will in the Northern Territory with up to 50 new ranger jobs to continue to help farmers in the catchment to improve provide sustainable employment in NRM and to transfer farming practices. Reef Rescue will be jointly delivered traditional ecological knowledge, as a component of with the Sustainable Agriculture stream of the second the Australian Government’s Stronger Futures policy. phase of Caring for our Country. It will build on the Many of these Working on Country projects involve current successful model by investing in a range of the protection of important waterways, wetlands and activities to increase the health and resilience of the coastal environments. Caring for our Country will focus Great Barrier Reef such as: on community capacity-building, strategic investments and whole-of-landscape approaches to help restore »» providing training and extension services and the health and resilience of aquatic ecosystems for water quality grants to agricultural land managers future generations. to accelerate the adoption of improved land management practices »» monitoring and reporting the outcomes of Reef Rescue investments »» research to develop new technologies to improve the health and resilience of the reef

53 References Report on the Review of the Caring for our Country Initiative. April 2012: www.nrmonline.nrm.gov.au/catalog/ mql:2697. Alluvium (2012). Evaluation of Caring for our Country outcomes at Ramsar sites and non-Ramsar high Rossrakesh, S. et al. (2012). Ensuring protection of Little ecological value aquatic ecosystems. Stringeybark Creek: evidence for a proposed design Draft report, Canberra, November 2012. standard for new developments. Melbourne waterway protection and restoration science–practice partnership. Australian wetlands: www.environment.gov.au/water/ Melbourne University and Melbourne Water. publications/environmental/wetlands/index.html. South East Queensland Healthy Waterways Partnership BMT WBM (2009a). Hunter estuary management study. (2007a). South East Queensland Healthy Waterways Final report to Newcastle City Council. September 2009. Strategy 2007–2012. Strategy overview. December, 2007. Botany Bay. A water sensitive future. Improving State of the Environment 2011. State of the Environment Water Quality in the Botany Bay ‘Hot Spot’. Committee, DSEWPaC: www.environment.gov.au/ www.nrm.gov.au/projects/open-call/nsw/botany-bay- soe/2011. water-quality. Accessed October 2012. Swan Canning Project Great Gardens Workshops. Coastcare: www.coastcare.com.au. www.swanrivertrust.wa.gov.au/be-part-of-the-action/get- Directory of Important Wetlands in Australia: involved/great-gardens-workshops. Accessed February www.environment.gov.au/water/publications/ 2013. environmental/wetlands/directory.html. Victorian DPCD (2013). 42.01 Environmental E-Water (2013). An evaluation of strategies used in the Significance Overlay, from Victoria’s Planning Schemes. Caring for Our Country program to improve water quality www.planningschemes.dpcd.vic.gov.au/aavpp/42_01. management in coastal hotspots. Canberra, March 2013. pdf. Accessed January 2013. Eberhard Consulting (2011). Caring for our Country— Water quality hotspots: www.environment.gov.au/water/ Reef Rescue as a program delivery model for natural policy-programs/nwqms/wqip/hotspots.html. resource management. May 2011: Water Technology (2008). Corner inlet sediment and www.nrmonline.nrm.gov.au/catalog/mql:2646. nutrient modelling. Final Report. Report No. J677/R05, Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation December 2008. Act 1999: www.environment.gov.au/epbc. West Gippsland CMA (2010a). Benefits of Work on Fortune, J. and Maly, G. (2009). Towards the Strzelecki Dairy Block Flows into Corner Inlet. Media development of a water quality protection plan for the release 2 July 2010. Accessed February 2013. Darwin Harbour region. Phase 1 report. Aquatic Health West Gippsland CMA (2010b). Healthy Farms, Healthy Unit, Department of Natural Resources, Environment, Corner Inlet. Media release 10 May 2010. the Arts and Sport. Palmerston, Northern Territory. Western Australia Department of Water (2012). Great Barrier Reef Outlook Report 2009: Draft Vasse Geographe nutrient status, trends and loads. www.gbrmpa.gov.au/outlook-for-the-reef/great-barrier- Department of Water internal report, Government of reef-outlook-report. Western Australia. GBR (2013). Great Barrier Reef, Second Report Western Australia Environmental Protection Authority Card 2010, Reef Water Quality Protection Plan. (2008). Water Quality Improvement Plan for the Rivers www.reefplan.qld.gov.au/about/assets/gbr-second- and Estuary of the Peel-Harvey System—Phosphorus report.pdf Management, WA Environmental Protection Authority. Hoye, J., Brook, J., Arnott, C. and Collis, F. (2008). Working on Country: www.environment.gov.au/ Fostering sustainable behaviour in Corner Inlet: indigenous/workingoncountry. a social marketing approach. Report to the West Gippsland Catchment Management Authority by Zavadil, E. et al. (2008). Fluvial Geomorphology of the Ipsos, October 2008. Tributaries of Corner Inlet Ramsar Site. Alluvium for the West Gippsland Catchment Management Authority, Landcare: www.daff.gov.au/natural-resources/landcare. Victoria. Ramsar Convention: www.environment.gov.au/water/ topics/wetlands/ramsar-convention. Reef Water Quality Protection Plan 2009: www.reefplan.qld.gov.au/index.aspx.