DOCSLIB.ORG

Caring for Our Country Achievements

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Caring for Our Country Achievements caring for our country Achievements Report COASTAL ENVIRONMENTS AND CRITICAL AQUATIC HABITATS 2008 –2013 Coastwest, community seagrass monitoring project, Roebuck Bay, Broome, Western Australia. Source: Environs Kimberley Coastal Environments and Critical Aquatic Habitats Coastal Environments and Critical Aquatic Habitats Fragile ecosystems are being protected and rehabilitated by improving water quality, protecting Ramsar wetlands and delivering the Great Barrier Reef Rescue package. Coastwest, community seagrass monitoring project, Roebuck Bay, Broome, Western Australia. Source: Environs Kimberley 3 Table of contents Introduction 6 Reef Rescue outcomes 9 Outcome 1 Reduce the discharge of dissolved nutrients and chemicals from agricultural lands to the Great Barrier Reef lagoon by 25 per cent. 9 Outcome 2 Reduce the discharge of sediments and nutrients from agricultural lands to the Great Barrier Reef lagoon by 10 per cent 9 Case study: Minimal soil disturbance in cane farming—Tully/Murray catchment, Queensland 10 Case study: Repairing bank erosion in the Upper Johnstone catchment, Queensland 12 Case study: Sugar cane partnerships, Mackay Whitsunday region, Queensland 13 Case study: Horticulturalists nurturing the reef, Mackay Whitsunday region, Queensland 14 Case study: Land and Sea Country Indigenous Partnerships Program, Queensland 15 Outcome 3.1 Deliver actions that sustain the environmental values of priority sites in the Ramsar estate, particularly sites in northern and remote Australia. 17 Case study: Currawinya Lakes Ramsar wetland, Queensland 18 Case study: Macquarie Marshes Ramsar wetland, New South Wales 22 Case study: Interlaken Ramsar wetland, Tasmania 23 Case study: Peel–Yalgorup System Ramsar wetland, Western Australia 25 Outcome 3.2 Deliver actions that sustain the environmental values of an additional 25 per cent of (non-Ramsar) priority coastal and inland high conservation value aquatic ecosystems [now known as high ecological value aquatic ecosystems] including, as a priority, sites in the Murray–Darling Basin. 26 Case study: Lower Ovens River System high ecological value aquatic ecosystem, Victoria 27 Case study: Derwent Estuary high ecological value aquatic ecosystem, Tasmania 28 Case study: Anson Bay high ecological value aquatic ecosystem, Northern Territory 30 Outcome 4 Improve the water quality management in the Gippsland Lakes in Victoria, the Tuggerah Lakes Estuary in New South Wales and in all priority coastal hotspots. 31 Case study: Corner Inlet coastal hotspot, Victoria 31 Case study: Gippsland Lakes, Victoria 33 Case study: Tuggerah Lakes Estuary, New South Wales 35 Case study: Botany Bay coastal hotspot, New South Wales 37 Case study: Hunter River Estuary coastal hotspot, New South Wales 38 Case study: Swan Canning Estuary System coastal hotspot, Western Australia 39 Case study: Vasse Wonnerup and Geographe Bay coastal hotspot, Western Australia 40 Outcome 5 Increase the community’s participation in protecting and rehabilitating coastal environments and critical aquatic habitats 42 Case study: Glenelg Alliance, Victoria 43 Case study: Coastal communities protecting beach-nesting birds, Victoria 44 Case study: Catchment to coast—managing and restoring environmental values in the Cygnet River, South Australia 46 Case study: Water quality improvements in the Great Lakes—a community partnership, New South Wales 47 Case study: Partnerships protecting sea turtles, Queensland 48 Case study: Coastwest/Coastcare: engaging communities in caring for the coast, Western Australia 49 Case study: Caring for our Coast, New South Wales 50 Coastal Environments and Critical Aquatic Habitats Case study: Filling the gaps for Coastcare communities in southern Tasmania 51 Continued investment in Australia’s urban and coastal aquatic habitats – Phase II Caring for our Country 2013—2018 52 References 54 5 improving water quality in coastal hotspots and Introduction increasing community participation in coastal and aquatic restoration. Funded projects aimed to Australia’s coasts and critical aquatic habitats are ensure that these sites are sustained into the future. significant environmental assets which are also Caring for our Country investments focused on particular fundamentally important to the Australian lifestyle and approaches for achieving a number of strategic five-year economy. These environments support ecosystems outcomes. These approaches included: and provide habitat for threatened, marine and » providing incentives for improved land management migratory species and they also have cultural and practices to reduce sediment, nutrients and recreational values and support livelihoods. chemical discharges from agricultural lands The Caring for our Country initiative recognised the » allocating funding for planning and on-ground importance of these ecosystem services by providing activities to conserve these environments targeted investments to protect the Great Barrier Reef, Ramsar wetlands, high ecological value aquatic » investing in research and practices to improve ecosystems and priority coastal hotspots. water quality. The Great Barrier Reef is an internationally significant An essential aspect of these strategies was to build coral reef ecosystem that requires special protection the capacity of communities and land managers, as a World Heritage area and matter of national including Indigenous communities, to implement environmental significance under the Environment activities that improve coastal and aquatic assets. Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 Community organisations played an important role (EPBC Act). All of these coastal and aquatic assets face in mitigating the challenges of climate change, a range of pressures, including declining water quality, population growth and degradation of coastal climate change, dune erosion, habitat loss from urban environments. Funding was provided to deliver training development, land clearing and increased traffic and knowledge and enhance the capacity and skills from ports and marinas. of local communities to take actions to rehabilitate coastal waterways and wetlands, prevent coastal Identified priorities for the national priority area included erosion and protect important migratory bird sites. reducing sediment and nutrient discharge to the Great Indigenous communities were supported to reduce Barrier Reef lagoon, protecting and restoring Ramsar coastal and marine debris to protect threatened wetlands and high ecological value aquatic ecosystems, species such as turtles and dugongs. Tropical fish, Great Barrier Reef. Source: A. Heaney, DSEWPaC Coastal Environments and Critical Aquatic Habitats Water testing at a banana plantation, Innisfail, Queensland. Source: A. Heaney, DSEWPaC 7 In order to address the issues and challenges of the Various projects were funded to achieve the theme area, funding was targeted to achieve five five-year outcomes and long-term objective for outcomes by 2013: coastal environments and critical aquatic habitats. These projects, which aimed to improve environmental » reduce the discharge of dissolved nutrients and conditions and reverse the impact of threats to these chemicals from agricultural lands to the Great Barrier assets, included: Reef lagoon by 25 per cent » reduce the discharge of sediment and nutrients » establishing stewardship arrangements to from agricultural lands to the Great Barrier Reef protect high conservation value areas lagoon by 10 per cent » establishing buffer zones and fencing to » deliver actions that sustain the environmental protect water bodies from stock values of: » improving the application of chemical fertiliser » priority sites in the Ramsar estate, particularly sites and herbicide in northern and remote Australia, and » reducing and managing acid sulfate soils and – an additional 25 per cent of (non-Ramsar) salinity priority coastal and inland high ecological value » restoring wetlands and coastal areas aquatic ecosystems including, as a priority, » revegetating and managing weeds in major sites in the Murray–Darling Basin waterways and remnant bushland – improve the water quality management in the » developing Indigenous land and sea country Gippsland Lakes in Victoria, the Tuggerah management projects Lakes Estuary in New South Wales and all priority coastal hotspots » working with Indigenous communities to record and pass on traditional ecological knowledge and » increase the community’s participation in protect culturally important landscapes protecting and rehabilitating coastal environments and critical aquatic habitats. » trialling new technologies or techniques to improve water quality » expanding water quality monitoring programs. The achievement of five-year outcomes for this theme area assisted with reversing the impact of threats facing the Great Barrier Reef, Australia’s Ramsar wetlands and other high-value aquatic and coastal environments, while ensuring that local communities had the information and support to effectively address local threats to these environments. Ongoing efforts and investments are required to continue the successful management of priority coastal and aquatic sites. Reef Rescue outcomes1 Outcome 1 Reduce the discharge of dissolved nutrients Great Barrier Reef and chemicals from agricultural lands to the World Heritage area Great Barrier Reef lagoon by 25 per cent. Outcome 2 Reduce the discharge of sediments and nutrients from agricultural lands to the QLD Great Barrier Reef lagoon by 10 per cent. Australia’s Great Barrier Reef extends
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Hunter Estuary Wetlands Ramsar Site Is Located in the Lower Hunter River Estuary, Along the Central Coast of New South Wales
    The Hunter Estuary Wetlands Ramsar site is located in the lower Hunter River estuary, along the central coast of New South Wales. Tomago Wetland lies immediately to the west of Fullerton Cove. As part of the Williamtown - Long Bight - Tomago Drainage Scheme, the levee bank, ring drain and other internal drains were enlarged by the NSW Public Works Department between 1968 and 1980 (MacDonald et al. 1997). These engineering works, including the installation of floodgates at the tidal boundary, ensured that tidal waters are excluded from Tomago Wetlands (i.e. the site drains via one- way tidal floodgates). The drainage and exclusion of tidal waters within Tomago Wetland degraded the salt marsh ecosystem and fostered the growth of non-salt marsh species. Lowering of the groundwater table also oxidised sub-surface acid sulfate soils causing soil acidification. Grazing and other users of the site further degraded the previous ecosystem and reduced migratory wading bird habitat. Tidal inundation was restored to the western portion of the site in 2007, with a culvert restricting exchange between the eastern and western sides installed as part of these works. As such the western half of Tomago Wetlands remains in an unrestored state. This study aimed to determine the impact of restoring tidal exchange at the eastern floodgates of Tomago Wetlands. Benefits of tidal restoration would include increased fish habitat, reduced weed growth, increase salt marsh habitat, improved bird roosting and feeding conditions and minimise acid sulfate soil impacts. Two-Dimensional (2D) numerical modelling hydrodynamic tools were used to simulate the reintroduction of tidal exchange at the site and to determine the optimal configuration of on-ground structures.
    [Show full text]
  • Kooragang Wetlands: Retrospective of an Integrated Ecological Restoration Project in the Hunter River Estuary
    KOORAGANG WETLANDS: RETROSPECTIVE OF AN INTEGRATED ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION PROJECT IN THE HUNTER RIVER ESTUARY P Svoboda Hunter Local Land Services, Paterson NSW Introduction: At first glance, the Hunter River estuary near Newcastle NSW is a land of contradictions. It is home to one of the world’s largest coal ports and a large industrial complex as well as being the location of a large internationally significant wetland. The remarkable natural productivity of the Hunter estuary at the time of European settlement is well documented. Also well documented are the degradation and loss of fisheries and other wildlife habitat in the estuary due to over 200 years of draining, filling, dredging and clearing (Williams et al., 2000). However, in spite of extensive modification, natural systems of the estuary retained enough value and function for large areas to be transformed by restoration activities that aimed to show industry and environmental conservation could work together to their mutual benefit. By establishing partnerships and taking a collaborative and adaptive approach, the project was able to implement restoration and related activities on a landscape basis, working across land ownership and management boundaries (Kooragang Wetland Rehabilitation Project, 2010). The Kooragang Wetland Rehabilitation Project (KWRP) was launched in 1993 to help compensate for the loss of fisheries and other wildlife habitat at suitable sites in the Hunter estuary. This paper revisits the expectations and planning for the project as presented in a paper to the INTECOL’s V international wetlands conference in 1996 (Svoboda and Copeland, 1998), reviews the project’s activities, describes outcomes and summarises issues faced and lessons learnt during 24 years of implementing a large, long-term, integrated, adaptive and community-assisted ecological restoration project.
    [Show full text]
  • Motion 2- RAMSAR Listing Menindee Lakes.Pdf
    Motion 2 Region 4 – Central Darling Shire Council Motion: That the MDA calls on Basin Governments to endorse the Menindee Lakes, or a portion of the Lake system to be listed as a Ramsar site, in further consultation with the community. Objective: To protect the Menindee Lakes as a wetlands of cultural and ecological significance and to preserve and to conserve, through wise use and management, those areas of the system identified as appropriate for listing. Key Arguments: • In 2010-11 there were attempts to have a proportion of the Menindee Lakes recognised as being listed as a Ramsar site. Regional Development Australia Far West NSW (RDAFW) invested resources and efforts into having a proportion of the Lakes listed as a Ramsar Sites on behalf of Central Darling Shire and the Far West region. At this point in time, the State Government recognised the significance of the Menindee Lakes, however they were not able to support the project with the position of the Murray Darling Basin plan at the time. • Ramsar Convention and signing on Wetlands took place on 2 February 1971 at the small Iranian town named Ramsar and came into force on 21 December 1975. Since then, the Convention on Wetlands has been known as the Ramsar Convention. The Ramsar Convention's intentions is to halt the worldwide loss of wetlands and to conserve, through wise use and management, of those that remain. This requires international cooperation, policy making, capacity building and technology transfer. • Under the Ramsar Convention, a wide variety of natural and human-made habitat types ranging from rivers to coral reefs can be classified as wetlands.
    [Show full text]
  • Ramsar Sites in Order of Addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance
    Ramsar sites in order of addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance RS# Country Site Name Desig’n Date 1 Australia Cobourg Peninsula 8-May-74 2 Finland Aspskär 28-May-74 3 Finland Söderskär and Långören 28-May-74 4 Finland Björkör and Lågskär 28-May-74 5 Finland Signilskär 28-May-74 6 Finland Valassaaret and Björkögrunden 28-May-74 7 Finland Krunnit 28-May-74 8 Finland Ruskis 28-May-74 9 Finland Viikki 28-May-74 10 Finland Suomujärvi - Patvinsuo 28-May-74 11 Finland Martimoaapa - Lumiaapa 28-May-74 12 Finland Koitilaiskaira 28-May-74 13 Norway Åkersvika 9-Jul-74 14 Sweden Falsterbo - Foteviken 5-Dec-74 15 Sweden Klingavälsån - Krankesjön 5-Dec-74 16 Sweden Helgeån 5-Dec-74 17 Sweden Ottenby 5-Dec-74 18 Sweden Öland, eastern coastal areas 5-Dec-74 19 Sweden Getterön 5-Dec-74 20 Sweden Store Mosse and Kävsjön 5-Dec-74 21 Sweden Gotland, east coast 5-Dec-74 22 Sweden Hornborgasjön 5-Dec-74 23 Sweden Tåkern 5-Dec-74 24 Sweden Kvismaren 5-Dec-74 25 Sweden Hjälstaviken 5-Dec-74 26 Sweden Ånnsjön 5-Dec-74 27 Sweden Gammelstadsviken 5-Dec-74 28 Sweden Persöfjärden 5-Dec-74 29 Sweden Tärnasjön 5-Dec-74 30 Sweden Tjålmejaure - Laisdalen 5-Dec-74 31 Sweden Laidaure 5-Dec-74 32 Sweden Sjaunja 5-Dec-74 33 Sweden Tavvavuoma 5-Dec-74 34 South Africa De Hoop Vlei 12-Mar-75 35 South Africa Barberspan 12-Mar-75 36 Iran, I. R.
    [Show full text]
  • Which Feature, Place Or View Is Significant, Scenic Or Beautiful And
    DPCD South West Victoria Landscape Assessment Study | CONSULTATION & COMMUNITY VALUES Landscape Significance Significant features identified were: Other features identified outside the study area were: ▪ Mount Leura and Mount Sugarloaf, outstanding ▪ Lake Gnotuk & Lake Bullen Merri, “twin” lakes, near volcanic features the study area’s edge, outstanding volcanic features Which feature, place or view is ▪ Mount Elephant of natural beauty, especially viewed from the saddle significant, scenic or beautiful and ▪ Western District Lakes, including Lake Terangpom of land separating them why? and Lake Bookar ▪ Port Campbell’s headland and port Back Creek at Tarrone, a natural waterway ...Lake Gnotuk and the Leura maar are just two examples of ▪ Where would you take a visitor to the outstanding volcanic features of the Western District. They give great pleasure to locals and visitors alike... show them the best view of the Excerpt from Keith Staff’s submission landscape? ▪ Glenelg River, a heritage river which is “pretty much unspoilt” ▪ Lake Bunijon, “nestled between the Grampians and rich farmland in the west, the marsh grasses frame the lake as a native bird life sanctuary” ▪ Botanic gardens throughout the district which contain “weird and wonderful specimens” ▪ Wildflowers at the Grampians The Volcanic Edge Booklet: The Mt Leura & Mt Sugarloaf Reserves, Camperdown, provided by Graham Arkinstall The Age article from 1966 about saving Mount Sugarloaf Lake Terangpom Provided by Brigid Cole-Adams Photo provided by Stuart McCallum, Friends of Bannockburn Bush, Greening Australia 10 © 2013 DPCD South West Victoria Landscape Assessment Study | CONSULTATION & COMMUNITY VALUES Other significant places that were identified were: Significant views identified were: ▪ Ditchfield Road, Raglan, an unsealed road through ▪ Views generally in the south west region ▪ Views from summits of volcanic craters bushland ..
    [Show full text]
  • DUCK HUNTING in VICTORIA 2020 Background
    DUCK HUNTING IN VICTORIA 2020 Background The Wildlife (Game) Regulations 2012 provide for an annual duck season running from 3rd Saturday in March until the 2nd Monday in June in each year (80 days in 2020) and a 10 bird bag limit. Section 86 of the Wildlife Act 1975 enables the responsible Ministers to vary these arrangements. The Game Management Authority (GMA) is an independent statutory authority responsible for the regulation of game hunting in Victoria. Part of their statutory function is to make recommendations to the relevant Ministers (Agriculture and Environment) in relation to open and closed seasons, bag limits and declaring public and private land open or closed for hunting. A number of factors are reviewed each year to ensure duck hunting remains sustainable, including current and predicted environmental conditions such as habitat extent and duck population distribution, abundance and breeding. This review however, overlooks several reports and assessments which are intended for use in managing game and hunting which would offer a more complete picture of habitat, population, abundance and breeding, we will attempt to summarise some of these in this submission, these include: • 2019-20 Annual Waterfowl Quota Report to the Game Licensing Unit, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries • Assessment of Waterfowl Abundance and Wetland Condition in South- Eastern Australia, South Australian Department for Environment and Water • Victorian Summer waterbird Count, 2019, Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research As a key stakeholder representing 17,8011 members, Field & Game Australia Inc. (FGA) has been invited by GMA to participate in the Stakeholder Meeting and provide information to assist GMA brief the relevant Ministers, FGA thanks GMA for this opportunity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kimberley Journey to an Awe-Inspiring Land
    The Kimberley Journey to an awe-inspiring land. The Kimberley provides adventurers with a truly epic experience. It’s here you can take part in one of the last true outback adventures and experience the spectacular scenery along the 660 kilometre Gibb River Road. Search for pearls in Broome, look for birds in one of the most biologically diverse areas on earth or walk through the World Heritage-listed Bungle Bungle in Purnululu National Park. The Kimberley in Western Australia is one of the world’s last great wilderness areas stretching from Broome in the west to beyond Kununurra to the east. Rocks and plateaus An outdoor Art gAllery The World Heritage listed Purnululu National Park is home The Kimberley has a rich Aboriginal history thought to to the awe-inspiring 350-million year-old Bungle Bungle stretch back over 50,000 years, with traditional laws and – a vast area of beehive like sandstone domes that rise customs depicted through intricate rock art paintings 300 metres out of the earth, creating narrow chasms and across the landscape. The world-famous Gwion Gwion hidden gorges. More than 650 types of plants, 130 birds, 81 rock paintings are an integral part of the landscape and reptile and 12 frog species live here. are older than the Egyptian pyramids. The Kimberley’s dramatic Wandjina paintings, the creator spirits of the In the north of the Kimberley, the Mitchell Plateau and land, has become an internationally-recognised symbol spectacular Mitchell Falls are one of the least disturbed of Aboriginal Australia and was an important part of the ecosystems left in the world and are of great biological opening ceremony of the Sydney Olympics in 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Conospermum Hookeri Hookeri (Tasmanian Smokebush)
    Listing Statement for Conospermum hookeri (tasmanian smokebush) Conospermum hookeri tasmanian smokebush FAMILY: Proteaceae T A S M A N I A N T H R E A T E N E D S P E C I E S L I S T I N G S T A T E M E N T GROUP: Dicotyledon Photos: Naomi Lawrence Scientific name: Conospermum hookeri (Meisn.) E.M.Benn., Fl. Australia 16: 485 (1995) (Meisn.) Common name: tasmanian smokebush Name history: previously known in Tasmania as Conospermum taxifolium. Group: vascular plant, dicotyledon, family Proteaceae Status: Threatened Species Protection Act 1995: vulnerable Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999: Vulnerable Distribution: Biogeographic origin: endemic to Tasmania Tasmanian NRM regions: North, South Tasmanian IBRA Bioregions (V6): South East, Northern Midlands, Ben Lomond, Flinders Figure 1. Distribution of Conospermum hookeri Plate 1. Conospermum hookeri in flower. showing IBRA (V6) bioregions 1 Threatened Species Section – Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Listing Statement for Conospermum hookeri (tasmanian smokebush) Conospermum hookeri may be limited by low seed SUMMARY: Conospermum hookeri (tasmanian production rates. Other species of Conospermum smokebush) is a small shrub in the Proteaceae are known to have low reproductive outputs. family. It is endemic to Tasmania, occurring Approximately 50% of flowers of Conospermum along the East Coast from Bruny Island to species form fruit though only a small Cape Barren Island in 10 locations, two proportion of these produce viable seed presumed locally extinct and another of (Morrison et al. 1994). uncertain status. The number of subpopulations is estimated to be 40, with five Conospermum hookeri makes a highly significant presumed locally extinct or of uncertain status.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Investigation Into Eel Deaths in Western Victoria
    SCIENTIFIC REPORT SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATION INTO EEL DEATHS IN WESTERN VICTORIA PAUL LEAHY, RENEE PATTEN, ALEX LEONARD Publication 1173 December 2007 SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATION INTO EEL DEATHS IN WESTERN VICTORIA SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATION INTO EEL DEATHS IN WESTERN VICTORIA EPA Victoria 40 City Road, Southbank Victoria 3006 AUSTRALIA PAUL LEAHY, RENEE PATTEN, ALEX LEONARD December 2007 Publication 1173 ISBN 0 7306 7666 8 © EPA Victoria 2007 2 SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATION INTO EEL DEATHS IN WESTERN VICTORIA TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY......................................................................................................................................... 4 1. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................................... 6 2. METHODS ................................................................................................................................................... 9 Site location and description......................................................................................................................... 9 Collection of in-situ water parameters.......................................................................................................... 9 Chemical analysis .......................................................................................................................................... 11 Algal analysis................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Character Description for Roebuck Bay
    ECOLOGICAL CHARACTER DESCRIPTION FOR ROEBUCK BAY Wetland Research & Management ECOLOGICAL CHARACTER DESCRIPTION FOR ROEBUCK BAY Report prepared for the Department of Environment and Conservation by Bennelongia Pty Ltd 64 Jersey Street, Jolimont WA 6913 www.bennelongia.com.au In association with: DHI Water & Environment Pty Ltd 4A/Level 4, Council House 27-29 St Georges Terrace, Perth WA 6000 www.dhigroup.com.au Wetland Research & Management 28 William Street, Glen Forrest WA 6071 April 2009 Cover photographs: Roebuck Bay, © Jan Van de Kam, The Netherlands Introductory Notes This Ecological Character Description (ECD Publication) has been prepared in accordance with the National Framework and Guidance for Describing the Ecological Character of Australia’s Ramsar Wetlands (National Framework) (Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts, 2008). The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) prohibits actions that are likely to have a significant impact on the ecological character of a Ramsar wetland unless the Commonwealth Environment Minister has approved the taking of the action, or some other provision in the EPBC Act allows the action to be taken. The information in this ECD Publication does not indicate any commitment to a particular course of action, policy position or decision. Further, it does not provide assessment of any particular action within the meaning of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth), nor replace the role of the Minister or his delegate in making an informed decision to approve an action. This ECD Publication is provided without prejudice to any final decision by the Administrative Authority for Ramsar in Australia on change in ecological character in accordance with the requirements of Article 3.2 of the Ramsar Convention.
    [Show full text]
  • The Murray–Darling Basin Basin Animals and Habitat the Basin Supports a Diverse Range of Plants and the Murray–Darling Basin Is Australia’S Largest Animals
    The Murray–Darling Basin Basin animals and habitat The Basin supports a diverse range of plants and The Murray–Darling Basin is Australia’s largest animals. Over 350 species of birds (35 endangered), and most diverse river system — a place of great 100 species of lizards, 53 frogs and 46 snakes national significance with many important social, have been recorded — many of them found only in economic and environmental values. Australia. The Basin dominates the landscape of eastern At least 34 bird species depend upon wetlands in 1. 2. 6. Australia, covering over one million square the Basin for breeding. The Macquarie Marshes and kilometres — about 14% of the country — Hume Dam at 7% capacity in 2007 (left) and 100% capactiy in 2011 (right) Narran Lakes are vital habitats for colonial nesting including parts of New South Wales, Victoria, waterbirds (including straw-necked ibis, herons, Queensland and South Australia, and all of the cormorants and spoonbills). Sites such as these Australian Capital Territory. Australia’s three A highly variable river system regularly support more than 20,000 waterbirds and, longest rivers — the Darling, the Murray and the when in flood, over 500,000 birds have been seen. Australia is the driest inhabited continent on earth, Murrumbidgee — run through the Basin. Fifteen species of frogs also occur in the Macquarie and despite having one of the world’s largest Marshes, including the striped and ornate burrowing The Basin is best known as ‘Australia’s food catchments, river flows in the Murray–Darling Basin frogs, the waterholding frog and crucifix toad. bowl’, producing around one-third of the are among the lowest in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • There Has Been an Italian Presence in the Riverland Since
    1 Building blocks of settlement: Italians in the Riverland, South Australia By Sara King and Desmond O’Connor The Riverland region is situated approximately 200 km. north-east of Adelaide and consists of a strip of land on either side of the River Murray from the South Australian-Victorian border westwards to the town of Morgan. Covering more than 20,000 sq. km., it encompasses the seven local government areas of Barmera, Berri, Loxton, Morgan, Paringa, Renmark and Waikerie.1 The region was first identified as an area of primary production in 1887 when two Canadian brothers, George and William Chaffey, were granted a licence to occupy 101,700 hectares of land at Renmark in order to establish an irrigated horticultural scheme. By 1900 a prosperous settlement had developed in the area for the production of vines and fruit, and during the 1890s Depression other ‘village settlements’ were established down river by the South Australian Government to provide work for the city-based unemployed.2 During the years between the foundation of the villages and the First World War there was intense settlement, especially around Waikerie, Loxton, Berri and Barmera, as the area was opened up and increased in value.3 After World War 1, the SA Government made available new irrigation blocks at Renmark and other localities in the Riverland area to assist the resettlement of more than a thousand returned soldiers. A similar scheme operated in New South Wales, where returned servicemen were offered blocks in Leeton and Griffith, in the Murrumbidgee Irrigation Area.4 The period after World War 2 saw further settlement of returned soldiers on fruit blocks in the Riverland and new irrigation areas were developed to cater for this growth.
    [Show full text]