DOCSLIB.ORG

FAMILY Synbranchidae Bonaparte, 1835

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

FAMILY Synbranchidae Bonaparte, 1835 - swamp eels [=Catremia, Synbranchini, Ophicardides, Pneumobranchoidei [Pneumabranchoidei], Amphipnoina, Monopteridae, Flutidae, Typhlosynbranchinae, Cuchiidae, Cuchiidae, Macrotreminae] Notes: Catremia Rafinesque, 1815:93 [ref. 3584] (subfamily) ? Synbranchus [no stem of the type genus, not available, Article 11.7.1.1] Synbranchini Bonaparte, 1835:[22] [ref. 32242] (subfamily) Synbranchus [genus inferred from the stem, Article 11.7.1.1; stem changed to Symbranch- by Günther 1870:12 [ref. 1995] based on Symbranchus; senior objective synonym of Flutidae Jordan, 1923] Ophicardides McClelland, 1844:155, 159 [ref. 2928] (no family-group name) Pneumobranchoidei [Pneumabranchoidei] Bleeker, 1859d:XXXII [ref. 371] (family) Pneumabranchus Amphipnoina Günther, 1870:12, 13 [ref. 1995] (group) Amphipnous [senior objective synonym of Cuchiidae McAllister, 1968] Monopteridae Cope, 1871:455 [ref. 920] (family) Monopterus Flutidae Jordan, 1923a:129 [ref. 2421] (family) Fluta [junior objective synonym of Synbranchini Bonaparte, 1835, invalid, Article 61.3.2] Typhlosynbranchinae Pellegrin, 1923:215 [ref. 3403] (subfamily) Typhlosynbranchus Cuchiidae ‘Norman’, 1957:604 [ref. 31890] (family) Cuchia [hand written correction by ??; not available] Cuchiidae McAllister, 1968:159 [ref. 26854] (family) Cuchia [name only, but bibliographic reference to the description by Day 1878:656 [ref. 1080] Article 13.1.2; junior objective synonym of Amphipnoina Günther, 1870, invalid, Article 61.3.2] Macrotreminae Rosen & Greenwood, 1976:49 [ref. 7094] (subfamily) Macrotrema [emended to Macrotrematinae by Bailey & Gans 1998:2 [ref. 23296]] GENUS Macrotrema Regan, 1912 - swamp eels [=Macrotrema Regan [C. T.], 1912:390] Notes: [ref. 3645]. Neut. Symbranchus caligans Cantor, 1849. Type by monotypy. Correct spelling for genus of type species is Synbranchus. •Valid as Macrotrema Regan, 1912 -- (Rosen & Greenwood 1976:50 [ref. 7094], Kottelat 1989:16 [ref. 13605], Bailey & Gans 1998:4 [ref. 23296], Kottelat 2013:307 [ref. 32989]). Current status: Valid as Macrotrema Regan, 1912. Synbranchidae. Species Macrotrema caligans (Cantor, 1849) - Malaysian swamp eel [=Symbranchus caligans Cantor [T. E.], 1849:1316 [334], Pl. 7 (fig. 1-3)] Notes: [Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal v. 18 (pt 2); ref. 715] Penang, Malaysia. Current status: Valid as Macrotrema caligans (Cantor, 1849). Synbranchidae. Distribution: Southeastern Asia. Habitat: freshwater, brackish. GENUS Monopterus Lacepede, 1800 - swamp eels [=Monopterus Lacepède [B. G. E.], 1800:138, Amphipnous Müller [J.], 1840:117, Apterigia Basilewsky [S.], 1855:247, Cryptophthalmus Franz [V.], 1910:15, Fluta Bloch [M. E.] & Schneider [J. G.], 1801:565, Ophicardia McClelland [J.], 1844:175, 191, 218, Ophichthys Swainson [W.], 1839:196, 336, 445, Pneumabranchus McClelland [J.], 1844:411, Typhlosynbranchus Pellegrin [J.], 1922:884, Unagius Jordan [D. S.], 1919:343] Notes: [ref. 2709]. Masc. Monopterus javanensis Lacepède, 1800. Type by monotypy. Rosen & Greenwood 1976:56 give Muraena alba Zuiew as the type of Monopterus (not an originally included species; Lacepède included only one species, javanensis, and it is the type by monotypy). •Valid as Monopterus Lacepède, 1800 -- (Rosen & Greenwood 1976:56 [ref. 7094] and Jayaram 1981:309 [ref. 6497] with wrong type, Matsuura in Masuda et al. 1984:366 [ref. 6441], Daget 1986:291 [ref. 6203], Paxton et al. 1989:436 [ref. 12442], Kottelat 1989:16 [ref. 13605], Roberts 1989:183 [ref. 6439], Ataur Rahman 1989:50 [ref. 24860], Liu in Pan et al. 1991:357 [ref. 23876], Daget in Lévêque et al. 1992:659 [ref. 21590], Bailey & Gans 1998:2 [ref. 23296], Yang in Chen 1998:320 [ref. 23556], Gopi 2002:139 [ref. 27553], Ataur Rahman 2003:65 [ref. 31338], Proudlove 2006:186 [ref. 28992], Hoese & Gates 2006:860 [ref. 28997], Scharpf 2007:36 [ref. 30398], Britz et al. 2011:51 [ref. 31404], Kottelat 2013:308 [ref. 32989]). Current status: Valid as Monopterus Lacepède, 1800. Synbranchidae. (Amphipnous) [ref. 12523]. Masc. Unibranchapertura cuchia Hamilton, 1822. Type by original designation. Also in Müller 1841:246 [ref. 32989]. •Objective synonym of Cuchia Hamilton, 1831. •Status uncertain -- (Bailey & Gans 1998:2 [ref. 23296]). •Synonym of Monopterus Lacepède, 1800 -- (Rosen & Greenwood 1976:56 [ref. 7094], Daget 1986:291 [ref. 6203], Britz et al. 2011:51 [ref. 31404], Kottelat 2013:308 [ref. 32989]). Current status: Synonym of Monopterus Lacepède, 1800. Synbranchidae. (Apterigia) [ref. 200]. Fem. Apterigia saccogularis Basilewsky, 1855. Type by subsequent designation. Type designated by Jordan 1919:263 [ref. 2410]. •Synonym of Monopterus Lacepède, 1800 -- (Rosen & Greenwood 1976:56 [ref. 7094], Daget 1986:291 [ref. 6203], Kottelat 2013:308 [ref. 32989]). Current status: Synonym of Monopterus Lacepède, 1800. Synbranchidae. (Cryptophthalmus) [ref. 1481]. Masc. Cryptophthalmus robustus Franz, 1910. Type by monotypy. Objectively invalid; preoccupied by Cryptophthalmus Rafinesque, 1814 in Crustacea and Ehrenberg 1831 in Mollusca; replaced by Unagius Jordan, 1919. •Synonym of Monopterus Lacepède, 1800 -- (McCosker et al. 2011:272 [ref. 31452], Kottelat 2013:308 [ref. 32989]). Current status: Synonym of Monopterus Lacepède, 1800. Synbranchidae. (Fluta) [ref. 471]. Fem. Monopterus javanensis Lacepède, 1800. Type by monotype. Monopterus not preoccupied by Monopteros Volta, 1796. •Objective synonym of Monopterus Lacepède, 1800 -- (Rosen & Greenwood 1976:56 [ref. 7094] but with wrong type for Monopterus, Daget 1986:291 [ref. 6203], Roberts 1989:183 [ref. 6439], Kottelat 2013:308 [ref. 32989]). Current status: Synonym of Monopterus Lacepède, 1800. Synbranchidae. (Ophicardia) [ref. 2928]. Fem. Ophicardia phayriana McClelland, 1844. Type by monotypy. Species apparently misspelled phyariana in main entry (p. 191); named after Capt. Phayre (mentioned twice on p. 191-192) and spelled phayriana on p. 204 (legend to Pl. 12) and on p. 218. •Synonym of Monopterus Lacepède, 1800 -- (Rosen & Greenwood 1976:56 [ref. 7094] but as Ophiocardia, species as phyariana, Kottelat 2013:308 [ref. 32989]). Current status: Synonym of Monopterus Lacepède, 1800. Synbranchidae. (Ophichthys) [ref. 4303]. Masc. Ophichthys punctatus Swainson, 1839 (= Unibranchapertura cuchia Hamilton, 1822). Type by monotypy. As Ophicthys on p. 196 and 441 (index). Swainson's O. punctatus is an unneeded substitute for U. cuchia. Objective synonym of Cuchia Hamilton (in Taylor), 1831; also predates Amphipnous Müller, 1841 with same type. Ophichthys is also a misspelling of Ophichthus in some early literature. •Synonym of Monopterus Lacepède, 1800 -- (Rosen & Greenwood 1976:56 [ref. 7094], Daget 1986:291 [ref. 6203]. Kottelat 2013:308 [ref. 32989]). Current status: Synonym of Monopterus Lacepède, 1800. Synbranchidae. (Pneumabranchus) [ref. 2927]. Masc. Pneumabranchus cinereus McClelland, 1844. Type by monotypy. Usually attributed to McClelland 1844 [1845]:175, 192 [ref. 2928] with type as P. striatus, but appeared first in McClelland 1844 as above with only one included species. •Synonym of Monopterus Lacepède, 1800 -- (Rosen & Greenwood 1976:56 [ref. 7094], Daget 1986:291 [ref. 6203], Kottelat 2013:308 [ref. 32989]). Current status: Synonym of Monopterus Lacepède, 1800. Synbranchidae. (Typhlosynbranchus) [ref. 3402]. Masc. Typhlosynbranchus boueti Pellegrin, 1922. Type by monotypy. Typhlosymbranchus is a misspelling. •Synonym of Monopterus Lacepède, 1800 -- (Rosen & Greenwood 1976:56 [ref. 7094], Daget 1986:291 [ref. 6203], Kottelat 2013:308 [ref. 32989]). Current status: Synonym of Monopterus Lacepède, 1800. Synbranchidae. (Unagius) [ref. 2413]. Masc. Cryptophthalmus robustus Franz, 1910. Type by being a replacement name. Replacement for Cryptophthalmus Franz, 1910, preoccupied by Cryptophthalmus Rafinesque, 1814 in Crustacea and Ehrenberg 1831 in Mollusca. •Synonym of Monopterus Lacepède, 1800 -- (Kottelat 213:308 [ref. 32989]). Current status: Synonym of Monopterus Lacepède, 1800. Synbranchidae. Species Monopterus albus (Zuiew, 1793) - Asian swamp eel [=Muraena alba Zuiew [B.] 1793:299, Pl. 7 (fig. 2), Pneumabranchus cinereus McClelland [J.] 1843:411, Pl. 25 (fig. 3), Symbranchus grammicus Cantor [T. E.] 1842:486, Apterigia immaculata Basilewsky [S.] 1855:248, Unibranchapertura laevis Lacepède [B. G. E.] 1803:657, 658, Pl. 17 (fig. 3), Monopterus marmoratus Richardson [J.] (ex Temminck & Schlegel) 1846:315, Apterigia nigromaculata Basilewsky [S.] 1855:248, Pl. 2 (fig. 2), Cryptophthalmus robustus Franz [V.] 1910:15, Pl. 3 (fig. 11), Apterigia saccogularis Basilewsky [S.] 1855:247, Pl. 8 (fig. 2)] Notes: [Nova Acta Academiae Scientiarum Imperialis Petropolitanae v. 7 (for 1789); ref. 17717] No locality stated [Suriname]. Syntypes: ZIL uncat. (Dhalberg Collection, whereabouts unknown). Originally from Suriname, not Asia of authors. Current status: Valid as Monopterus albus (Zuiew, 1793). Synbranchidae. Distribution: Asia; introduced elsewhere. Habitat: freshwater, brackish. (cinereus) [Calcutta Journal of Natural History v. 4 (no. 4); ref. 2927] Chusan, China. Current status: Synonym of Monopterus albus (Zuiew, 1793). Synbranchidae. Habitat: freshwater, brackish. (grammicus) [Annals and Magazine of Natural History (New Series) v. 9 (nos 58, 59, 60); ref. 17344] Chusan Island, China. Current status: Synonym of Monopterus albus (Zuiew, 1793). Synbranchidae. Habitat: freshwater, brackish. (immaculata) [Nouveaux mémoires de la Société impériale des naturalistes de Moscou v. 10; ref. 200] Northern China. Current status:
Recommended publications
  • Estuarine Fish Diversity of Tamil Nadu, India

    Estuarine Fish Diversity of Tamil Nadu, India

    Indian Journal of Geo Marine Sciences Vol. 46 (10), October 2017, pp. 1968-1985 Estuarine fish diversity of Tamil Nadu, India H.S. Mogalekar*, J. Canciyal#, P. Jawahar, D.S. Patadiya, C. Sudhan, P. Pavinkumar, Prateek, S. Santhoshkumar & A. Subburaj Department of Fisheries Biology and Resource Management, Fisheries College & Research Institute, (Tamil Nadu Fisheries University), Thoothukudi-628 008, India. #ICAR-National Academy of Agricultural Research Management, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad-500 030, Telangana, India. *[E-Mail: [email protected]] Received 04 February 2016 ; revised 10 August 2017 Systematic and updated checklist of estuarine fishes contains 330 species distributed under 205 genera, 95 families, 23 orders and two classes. The most diverse order was perciformes with 175 species, 100 genera and 43 families. The top four families with the highest number of species were gobidae (28 species), carangidae (23 species), engraulidae (15 species) and lutjanidae (14 species). Conservation status of all taxa includes one species as endangered, five species as vulnerable, 14 near threatened, 93 least concern and 16 data deficient. As numbers of commercial, sports, ornamental and cultivable fishes are high, commercial and recreational fishing could be organized. Seed production by selective breeding is recommended for aquaculture practices in estuarine areas of Tamil Nadu. [Keywords: Estuarine fishes, updated checklist, fishery and conservation status, Tamil Nadu] Introduction significant component of coastal ecosystem due to The total estuarine area of Tamil Nadu their immense biodiversity values in aquatic was estimated to be 56000 ha, which accounts ecology. The fish fauna inhabiting the estuarine 3.88 % of the total estuarine area of India 1.
  • Edna in a Bottleneck: Obstacles to Fish Metabarcoding Studies in Megadiverse Freshwater 3 Systems 4 5 Authors: 6 Jake M

    Edna in a Bottleneck: Obstacles to Fish Metabarcoding Studies in Megadiverse Freshwater 3 Systems 4 5 Authors: 6 Jake M

    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.05.425493; this version posted January 7, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. 1 Title: 2 eDNA in a bottleneck: obstacles to fish metabarcoding studies in megadiverse freshwater 3 systems 4 5 Authors: 6 Jake M. Jackman1, Chiara Benvenuto1, Ilaria Coscia1, Cintia Oliveira Carvalho2, Jonathan S. 7 Ready2, Jean P. Boubli1, William E. Magnusson3, Allan D. McDevitt1* and Naiara Guimarães 8 Sales1,4* 9 10 Addresses: 11 1Environment and Ecosystem Research Centre, School of Science, Engineering and Environment, 12 University of Salford, Salford, M5 4WT, UK 13 2Centro de Estudos Avançados de Biodiversidade, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade 14 Federal do Pará, Belém, Brazil 15 3Coordenação de Biodiversidade, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Manaus, 16 Amazonas, Brazil 17 4CESAM - Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies, Departamento de Biologia Animal, 18 Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal 19 20 *Corresponding authors: 21 Naiara Guimarães Sales, [email protected] 22 Allan McDevitt, [email protected] 23 24 Running title: Obstacles to eDNA surveys in megadiverse systems 25 26 Keywords: Amazon, barcoding gap, freshwater, MiFish, Neotropics, reference database, 27 taxonomic resolution 28 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.05.425493; this version posted January 7, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
  • A Systematic Review About the Anatomy of Asian Swamp Eel (Monopterus Albus)

    A Systematic Review About the Anatomy of Asian Swamp Eel (Monopterus Albus)

    Advances in Complementary & CRIMSON PUBLISHERS C Wings to the Research Alternative medicine ISSN 2637-7802 Mini Review A Systematic Review about the Anatomy of Asian Swamp Eel (Monopterus albus) Ayah Rebhi Hilles1*, Syed Mahmood2* and Ridzwan Hashim1 1Department of Biomedical Sciences, International Islamic University Malaysia, Malaysia 2Department of Pharmaceutical Engineering, University Malaysia Pahang, Malaysia *Corresponding author: Ayah Rebhi Hilles, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Kulliyyah of Allied Health Sciences, International Islamic University Malaysia, 25200 Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia Syed Mahmood, Department of Pharmaceutical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Technology, University Malaysia Pahang, 26300 Gambang, Pahang, Malaysia Submission: April 19, 2018; Published: May 08, 2018 Taxonomy and Distribution of Asian Swamp Eel has been indicated that the ventilatory and cardiovascular of eel are Asian swamp eel, Monopterus albus belongs to the family able to regulate hypoxia to meet the O demands of their tissues synbranchidae of the order synbranchiformes [1]. The Asian swamp 2 [12]. and subtropical areas of northern India and Burma to China, Respiratory system eel is commonly found in paddy field and it is native to the tropical Thailand, Philippines, Malaysia, Indonesia, and possibly north- M. albus eastern Australia [2]. The swamp eel can live in holes without water anterior three arches only have gills. It is an air breather. The ratio has four internal gill slits and five gill arches, the of aerial and aquatic respiration is 3 to 1. When aerial respiration say that they pass their summer in the hole, but sometimes coming with the help of their respiratory organs. Some fishery scientists is not possible, M. albus can depend on aquatic respiration [13].
  • Percomorph Phylogeny: a Survey of Acanthomorphs and a New Proposal

    Percomorph Phylogeny: a Survey of Acanthomorphs and a New Proposal

    BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, 52(1): 554-626, 1993 PERCOMORPH PHYLOGENY: A SURVEY OF ACANTHOMORPHS AND A NEW PROPOSAL G. David Johnson and Colin Patterson ABSTRACT The interrelationships of acanthomorph fishes are reviewed. We recognize seven mono- phyletic terminal taxa among acanthomorphs: Lampridiformes, Polymixiiformes, Paracan- thopterygii, Stephanoberyciformes, Beryciformes, Zeiformes, and a new taxon named Smeg- mamorpha. The Percomorpha, as currently constituted, are polyphyletic, and the Perciformes are probably paraphyletic. The smegmamorphs comprise five subgroups: Synbranchiformes (Synbranchoidei and Mastacembeloidei), Mugilomorpha (Mugiloidei), Elassomatidae (Elas- soma), Gasterosteiformes, and Atherinomorpha. Monophyly of Lampridiformes is justified elsewhere; we have found no new characters to substantiate the monophyly of Polymixi- iformes (which is not in doubt) or Paracanthopterygii. Stephanoberyciformes uniquely share a modification of the extrascapular, and Beryciformes a modification of the anterior part of the supraorbital and infraorbital sensory canals, here named Jakubowski's organ. Our Zei- formes excludes the Caproidae, and characters are proposed to justify the monophyly of the group in that restricted sense. The Smegmamorpha are thought to be monophyletic principally because of the configuration of the first vertebra and its intermuscular bone. Within the Smegmamorpha, the Atherinomorpha and Mugilomorpha are shown to be monophyletic elsewhere. Our Gasterosteiformes includes the syngnathoids and the Pegasiformes
  • Fishes from the Itapecuru River Basin, State of Maranhão, Northeast Brazil

    Fishes from the Itapecuru River Basin, State of Maranhão, Northeast Brazil

    Fishes from the Itapecuru River basin, State of Maranhão, northeast Brazil Barros, MC.a*, Fraga, EC.a* and Birindelli, JLO.b aLaboratório de Genética e Biologia Molecular, Centro de Estudos Superiores de Caxias, Universidade Estadual do Maranhão – UEMA, Praça Duque de Caxias, s/n, CEP 65604-380, Caxias, MA, Brazil bMuseu de Zoologia, Universidade de São Paulo – USP, Av. Nazaré, 481, CEP 04263-000, São Paulo, SP, Brazil *e-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Received December 14, 2009 – Accepted May 26, 2010 – Distributed May 31, 2011 (With 1 figure) Abstract The Itapecuru is a relatively large river in the northeastern Brazilian state of Maranhão. During several expeditions to this basin, we collected 69 fish species belonging to 65 genera, 29 families and 10 orders. Characiformes and Siluriformes were the orders with the largest number of species and Characidae, Loricariidae, Cichlidae, Auchenipteridae and Pimelodidae were the richest families. About 30% of the fish fauna of the Itapecuru basin is endemic or restricted to northeastern Brazil. Just over a fifth (22%) of the species is also known to occur in the Amazon basin and only a few are more widely distributed in South American. Keywords: taxonomy, biodiversity, freshwater fishes. Peixes da bacia do Rio Itapecuru, Estado do Maranhão, nordeste do Brasil Resumo A bacia do rio Itapecuru é relativamente grande no Estado do Maranhão, nordeste do Brasil. Durante várias expedições nesta bacia, nós coletamos 69 espécies de peixes, pertencentes a 65 gêneros, 29 famílias e 10 ordens. Characiformes e Siluriformes foram as ordens com maior número de espécies e Characidae, Loricariidae, Cichlidae, Auchenipteridae e Pimelodidae as famílias com maior riqueza.
  • FAMILY Ophichthidae Gunther, 1870

    FAMILY Ophichthidae Gunther, 1870

    FAMILY Ophichthidae Gunther, 1870 - snake eels and worm eels SUBFAMILY Myrophinae Kaup, 1856 - worm eels [=Neenchelidae, Aoteaidae, Muraenichthyidae, Benthenchelyini] Notes: Myrophinae Kaup, 1856a:53 [ref. 2572] (subfamily) Myrophis [also Kaup 1856b:29 [ref. 2573]] Neenchelidae Bamber, 1915:478 [ref. 172] (family) Neenchelys [corrected to Neenchelyidae by Jordan 1923a:133 [ref. 2421], confirmed by Fowler 1934b:163 [ref. 32669], by Myers & Storey 1956:21 [ref. 32831] and by Greenwood, Rosen, Weitzman & Myers 1966:393 [ref. 26856]] Aoteaidae Phillipps, 1926:533 [ref. 6447] (family) Aotea [Gosline 1971:124 [ref. 26857] used Aotidae; family name sometimes seen as Aoteidae or Aoteridae] Muraenichthyidae Whitley, 1955b:110 [ref. 4722] (family) Muraenichthys [name only, used as valid before 2000?; not available] Benthenchelyini McCosker, 1977:13, 57 [ref. 6836] (tribe) Benthenchelys GENUS Ahlia Jordan & Davis, 1891 - worm eels [=Ahlia Jordan [D. S.] & Davis [B. M.], 1891:639] Notes: [ref. 2437]. Fem. Myrophis egmontis Jordan, 1884. Type by original designation (also monotypic). •Valid as Ahlia Jordan & Davis, 1891 -- (McCosker et al. 1989:272 [ref. 13288], McCosker 2003:732 [ref. 26993], McCosker et al. 2012:1191 [ref. 32371]). Current status: Valid as Ahlia Jordan & Davis, 1891. Ophichthidae: Myrophinae. Species Ahlia egmontis (Jordan, 1884) - key worm eel [=Myrophis egmontis Jordan [D. S.], 1884:44, Leptocephalus crenatus Strömman [P. H.], 1896:32, Pl. 3 (figs. 4-5), Leptocephalus hexastigma Regan [C. T.] 1916:141, Pl. 7 (fig. 6), Leptocephalus humilis Strömman [P. H.], 1896:29, Pl. 2 (figs. 7-9), Myrophis macrophthalmus Parr [A. E.], 1930:10, Fig. 1 (bottom), Myrophis microps Parr [A. E.], 1930:11, Fig. 1 (top)] Notes: [Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia v.
  • Genetic Characterization of Swamp Eel of Bangladesh Through Dna Barcoding and Rapd Techniques

    Genetic Characterization of Swamp Eel of Bangladesh Through Dna Barcoding and Rapd Techniques

    J. Asiat. Soc. Bangladesh, Sci. 46(2): 117-131, December 2020 GENETIC CHARACTERIZATION OF SWAMP EEL OF BANGLADESH THROUGH DNA BARCODING AND RAPD TECHNIQUES MD MINHAZUL ABEDIN, MD MOSTAVI ENAN ESHIK, NUSRAT JAHAN PUNOM, MST. KHADIZA BEGUM AND MOHAMMAD SHAMSUR RAHMAN* Department of Fisheries, University of Dhaka, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh Abstract The freshwater air-breathing swamp eel Monopterus spp. are native to the freshwater of Bangladesh and throughout the Indian subcontinent. To identify the different swamp eel species and to check the genetic diversity among them, a total of twelve swamp eel specimens were collected from four districts (Tangail, Bogura, Bagerhat and Sylhet) representing the four division of Bangladesh. The extracted DNA from twelve fish samples was amplified by the PCR technique for DNA barcoding and RAPD analysis. Among 12 specimens, 8 specimens showed a 95-100% similarity with M. cuchia species published in the NCBI GenBank database and BOLD system. The studied mct3 (collected from Tangail region), mcs1, mcs2 and mcs3 (collected from Sylhet region) specimens showed about 83% homology with Ophisternon sp. MFIV306-10 as per BLAST search; whereas BOLD private database showed 99% similarity with Ophisternon bengalense (Bengal eel). From the phylogenetic tree analysis, 8 samples were clustered with M. cuchia and 4 samples showed similarity with Ophisternon sp. MFIV306-10 and Ophisternon bengalense _ANGBF45828-19. In RAPD-PCR based analysis, it was found that the maximum genetic distance (1.6094) was observed between mcba2 and mcs3, while between mct1 and mct2, the minimum genetic distance was 0.000. A total of 192 bands, of which 35 were polymorphic with 17.88% polymorphisms among swamp eel species and the size of the amplified DNA fragments ranged from 250 to 1800 bp.
  • Freshwater Fishes of the Burdekin Dry Tropics Acknowledgements

    Freshwater Fishes of the Burdekin Dry Tropics Acknowledgements

    Freshwater Fishes of the Burdekin Dry Tropics Acknowledgements Much of the information about fish species and their distribution in the Burdekin Dry Tropics NRM region is based on the work of Dr Brad Pusey (Griffith University). The Australian Centre for Tropical Freshwater Research (ACTFR) provided access to their Northern Australian Fish (NAF) database which contains the most current fish survey data for tropical Australia. Dr Allan Webb (ACTFR) provided information on the exotic fish species recorded from the immediate Townsville region. Thanks to Alf Hogan from Fisheries Queensland for providing data on species distribution. Thanks also to Bernard Yau and efishalbum for their image of the Threadfin Silver Biddy. Published by NQ Dry Tropics Ltd trading as NQ Dry Tropics. Copyright 2010 NQ Dry Tropics Ltd ISBN 978-921584-21-3 The Copyright Act 1968 permits fair dealing for study research, news reporting, criticism, or review. Selected passages, tables or diagrams may be reproduced for such purposes provided acknowledgement of the source is included. Major extracts of the entire document may not be reproduced by any process without the written permission of the Chief Executive Officer, NQ Dry Tropics. Please reference as: Carter, J & Tait, J 2010, Freshwater Fishes of the Burdekin Dry Tropics, Townsville. Further copies may be obtained from NQ Dry Tropics or from our Website: www.nqdrytropics.com.au Cnr McIlwraith and Dean St P.O Box 1466, Townsville Q 4810 Ph: (07) 4724 3544 Fax: (07) 4724 3577 Important Disclaimer: The information contained in this report has been compiled in good faith from sources NQ Dry Tropics Limited trading as NQ Dry Tropics believes to be reliable.
  • Using Molecular Identification of Ichthyoplankton to Monitor

    Using Molecular Identification of Ichthyoplankton to Monitor

    Molecular Identification of Ichthyoplankton in Cabo Pulmo National Park 1 Using molecular identification of ichthyoplankton to monitor 2 spawning activity in a subtropical no-take Marine Reserve 3 4 5 6 Ana Luisa M. Ahern1, *, Ronald S. Burton1, Ricardo J. Saldierna-Martínez2, Andrew F. Johnson1, 7 Alice E. Harada1, Brad Erisman1,4, Octavio Aburto-Oropeza1, David I. Castro Arvizú3, Arturo R. 8 Sánchez-Uvera2, Jaime Gómez-Gutiérrez2 9 10 11 12 1Marine Biology Research Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California 13 San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA 14 2Departamento de Plancton y Ecología Marina, Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas, 15 Instituto Politécnico Nacional, CP 23096, La Paz, Baja California Sur, Mexico 16 3Cabo Pulmo National Park, Baja California Sur, Mexico 17 4The University of Texas at Austin, Marine Science Institute, College of Natural Sciences, 18 Port Aransas, Texas, USA 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 *Corresponding author: [email protected] 1 Molecular Identification of Ichthyoplankton in Cabo Pulmo National Park 26 ABSTRACT: Ichthyoplankton studies can provide valuable information on the species richness 27 and spawning activity of fishes, complementing estimations done using trawls and diver surveys. 28 Zooplankton samples were collected weekly between January and December 2014 in Cabo 29 Pulmo National Park, Gulf of California, Mexico (n=48). Fish larvae and particularly eggs are 30 difficult to identify morphologically, therefore the DNA barcoding method was employed to 31 identify 4,388 specimens, resulting in 157 Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) corresponding 32 to species. Scarus sp., Halichoeres dispilus, Xyrichtys mundiceps, Euthynnus lineatus, 33 Ammodytoides gilli, Synodus lacertinus, Etrumeus acuminatus, Chanos chanos, Haemulon 34 flaviguttatum, and Vinciguerria lucetia were the most abundant and frequent species recorded.
  • Universidade Do Estado Do Rio De Janeiro Centro Biomédico Instituto De Biologia Roberto Alcantara Gomes

    Universidade Do Estado Do Rio De Janeiro Centro Biomédico Instituto De Biologia Roberto Alcantara Gomes

    Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro Centro Biomédico Instituto de Biologia Roberto Alcantara Gomes Milena Gomes Simão Osteologia de Synbranchus marmoratus (Synbranchiformes: Synbranchidae) Rio de Janeiro 2012 Milena Gomes Simão Osteologia de Synbranchus marmoratus (Synbranchiformes: Synbranchidae) Dissertação apresentada como requisito parcial para obtenção do título de Mestre, ao Programa de Pós-graduação em Biociências, da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Orientador: Prof. Dr. Paulo Marques Machado Brito Rio de Janeiro 2012 CATALOGAÇÃO NA FONTE UERJ/REDE SIRIUS/BIBLIOTECA CB-A S588 Simão, Milena Gomes. Osteologia de Synbranchus marmoratus (Synbranchiformes: Synbranchidae) / Milena Gomes Simão. – 2012. 83 f. Orientador: Paulo Marques Machado Brito. Dissertação (Mestrado) – Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Biologia Roberto Alcântara Gomes. Programa de Pós-graduação em Biociências. 1. Osteologia. 2. Synbranchus marmoratus – Teses. 3. Peixe de água doce – Teses. I. Brito, Paulo Marques Machado. II. Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de Biologia Roberto Alcântara Gomes. III. Título. CDU 597.591 Autorizo, apenas para fins acadêmicos e científicos, a reprodução total ou parcial desta dissertação, desde que citada a fonte. ____________________________________________ _______________________ Assinatura Data Milena Gomes Simão Osteologia de Synbranchus marmoratus (Synbranchiformes: Synbranchidae) Dissertação apresentada como requisito parcial para obtenção do título de Mestre, ao Programa de Pós-graduação em Biociências, da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Aprovada em 28 de março de 2012. Orientador: _____________________________________________ Prof. Dr. Paulo Marques Machado Brito Instituto de Biologia Roberto Alcântara Gomes - UERJ Banca Examinadora: _____________________________________________ Prof.ª Dra. Andréa Espínola de Siqueira Instituto de Biologia Roberto Alcântara Gomes - UERJ _____________________________________________ Prof.ª Dra.
  • (Ciconia Maguari) in the Pampa Eco-Region of South

    (Ciconia Maguari) in the Pampa Eco-Region of South

    NORTH-WESTERN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY 17 (1): 106-110 ©NWJZ, Oradea, Romania, 2021 Article No.: e201603 http://biozoojournals.ro/nwjz/index.html Citizen science for the knowledge of tropical birds: the diet of the Maguari Stork (Ciconia maguari) in the Pampa ecoregion of southern Brazil Dárius Pukenis TUBELIS1* and Milena WACHLEVSKI2 1. Department of Biosciences, Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido, Mossoró, RN, 59625-900, Brazil. 2. Laboratory of Animal Behavior and Ecology, Department of Biosciences, Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido, Mossoró, RN, 59625-900, Brazil. * Corresponding author, D.P. Tubelis, E-mail: [email protected] Received: 04. October 2020 / Accepted: 01. December 2020 / Available online: 15. December 2020 / Printed: June 2021 Abstract.The Maguari Stork (Ciconia maguari) occurs extensively in South America where it inhabits mainly wetlands. Despite being common in some regions, information on several aspects of its ecology is lacking. The objective of this study was to investigate the diet of Maguari Storks in the Pampa ecoregion of southern Brazil using citizen science. A compilation of records of foraging birds was done in two on-line databases - WikiAves and e-Bird Brasil. A total of 36 records, obtained by citizens between 2008 and 2020, reported storks holding preys with their bills. The most frequent food item was the muçum fish (Synbranchus marmoratus), representing 39% of the preys. Squamate reptiles and anuran amphibians comprised 33% and 19% of the food items, respectively. Most preys had a serpentiform body shape, being represented mainly by muçum and snakes. This study suggests that our knowledge regarding the natural history of Brazilian birds can increase through citizen science.
  • Training Manual Series No.15/2018

    Training Manual Series No.15/2018

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CMFRI Digital Repository DBTR-H D Indian Council of Agricultural Research Ministry of Science and Technology Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute Department of Biotechnology CMFRI Training Manual Series No.15/2018 Training Manual In the frame work of the project: DBT sponsored Three Months National Training in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology for Fisheries Professionals 2015-18 Training Manual In the frame work of the project: DBT sponsored Three Months National Training in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology for Fisheries Professionals 2015-18 Training Manual This is a limited edition of the CMFRI Training Manual provided to participants of the “DBT sponsored Three Months National Training in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology for Fisheries Professionals” organized by the Marine Biotechnology Division of Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (CMFRI), from 2nd February 2015 - 31st March 2018. Principal Investigator Dr. P. Vijayagopal Compiled & Edited by Dr. P. Vijayagopal Dr. Reynold Peter Assisted by Aditya Prabhakar Swetha Dhamodharan P V ISBN 978-93-82263-24-1 CMFRI Training Manual Series No.15/2018 Published by Dr A Gopalakrishnan Director, Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (ICAR-CMFRI) Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute PB.No:1603, Ernakulam North P.O, Kochi-682018, India. 2 Foreword Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (CMFRI), Kochi along with CIFE, Mumbai and CIFA, Bhubaneswar within the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) and Department of Biotechnology of Government of India organized a series of training programs entitled “DBT sponsored Three Months National Training in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology for Fisheries Professionals”.