DOCSLIB.ORG

AFMC Strategic Plan to Help Carry Air Force to Third Offset

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
AFMC Strategic Plan to Help Carry Air Force to Third Offset Vol. 74, No. 11 Tinker Air Force Base, Okla. Friday, March 18, 2016 INSIDE AFMC strategic plan to help Sequestration poses biggest threat to carry Air Force to Third Offset readiness, Stacey Geiger military leaders Air Force Materiel Command say Public Affairs Page 2 WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE, Ohio — Agility and innovation are cornerstones of a new Air Force Materiel Command strategic plan that AFSC/LG will deliver war-winning capabilities. Those capabilities deputy retires will propel the Air Force as Page 2 a key element of the future national defense strategy known as the Third Offset. The first “offset” came in the 1950s when the United States looked to tactical nuclear Are you weapons to deter, or offset, Air Force photo by Jim Haseltine prepared? large, conventional forces in Western Europe. The second Lt. Col. George Watkins, 34th Fighter Squadron commander, drops a GBU-12 laser-guided bomb from Base officials an F-35A at the Utah Test and Training Range Feb. 25. The 34th FS is the Air Force’s first combat unit offset came in the 1970s when to employ munitions from the F-35A. offer weather, the Soviet Union achieved active shooter nuclear parity and the U.S. to leverage new technologies autonomous systems and satellite networks, cyber bugs preparedness sought an advantage by turning to offset advances made by human-machine networks. A that infect and take down tips to precision-guided weapons. adversaries in recent years. battlespace of the year 2030 adversaries’ computers and The Third Offset is the It will draw on technologies could see F-35s or a next- Pages 8-9 Department of Defense strategy such as artificial intelligence, generation aircraft linked by See Plan page 5. Tinker Events Calendar Page 1b Visit us online at Air Force photo by Albert Bright www.tinker.af.mil Air Force Materiel Command’s 2015 Annual Excellence Award winners from the Air Force Sustainment Center gather with ASFC lead- ership after the awards ceremony March 9 at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio. From left are AFSC Command Chief Master Sgt. Jason L. France; Master Sgt. Brian Partido, from Tinker’s 72nd Medical Group, winner of the First Sergeant Category; Tech. Sgt. Kasmir Alford, from Tinker’s 72nd Medical Support Squadron, winner of the Non-Commissioned Officer Category; Steven Smith, from the 78th Civil Engineering Group at Robins AFB, Ga., winner of the Civilian Category I; Maj. David Jarnot, from the 75th Medical Support Squadron at Hill AFB, Utah, winner of the Field Grade Officer Category; and AFSC Commander Lt. Gen. Lee K. Levy II. Like us on Facebook www.facebook.com/ Four AFSC people among command award winners tinkerairforcebase Air Force Materiel Command Four members of the Air Force Ga. — are among those who were honored. Public Affairs Sustainment Center — Tech. Sgt. Kasmir Fifty-eight Airmen from throughout A. Alford, 72nd Medical Support Squadron; AFMC’s headquarters, centers and wings WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE Master Sgt. Brian S. Partido, 72nd Medical were nominated to compete in nine separate BASE, Ohio — Air Force Materiel Group; Maj. David R. Jarnot, 75th categories — airman, non-commissioned Command honored its top Airmen of 2015 Medical Support Squadron, Hill Air Force officer, senior NCO, first sergeant, company Follow us on Twitter during the command’s Annual Excellence Base, Utah; Steven L. Smith, 78th Civil grade officer, field grade officer, civilian @Team_Tinker Awards Banquet March 9. Engineering Group, Robins Air Force Base, See Winners page 3. 2 — www.TinkerTakeOff.com — March 18, 2016 Sequestration poses biggest threat to readiness, military leaders say Lisa Ferdinando the resources for deployed forces and supports continued DOD News, Defense Media Activity readiness recovery efforts. “This submission also contains the hard choices and WASHINGTON (AFNS) -- The biggest challenge to the tradeoffs we made to achieve future warfighting capability,” military’s readiness is sequestration, military leaders said she said. March 15 on Capitol Hill. Sequestration is a provision of the Budget Control Act Marines ready to fight of 2011 that imposes across-the-board spending cuts if For the Marine Corps, members are ready to fight and are Col. Jeff Meserve Congress and the White House cannot agree on more forward deployed around the world for crisis response, the targeted cuts aimed at reducing the budget deficit. assistant commandant of the Marine Corps told the Senate The uncertain and restrictive budget environment is panel. Maintaining that stance requires carefully allocating forcing the Army to make tough choices, the vice chief of limited funds and working around budget limitations, Gen. AFSC/LG staff of the Army, Gen. Daniel B. Allyn, told the Senate John M. Paxton Jr. said. Armed Services Committee. “In our challenging fiscal environment we’re struggling deputy retires Allyn and his counterparts from the Navy, Air Force and to maintain all of those balances,” he added. Marine Corps spoke at a hearing on the current state of The Marine Corps is no longer in a healthy position to Kimberly Woodruff readiness of U.S. forces. generate current readiness and simultaneously reset all of Staff Writer “We must have … predictable and sustained funding its equipment while sustaining its facilities and modernizing to deliver the readiness that our combatant commanders to ensure future readiness, Paxton said. “The strains on our Col. Jeff Meserve, deputy director require to meet the missions that continue to emerge,” Allyn personnel and equipment are showing in many areas,” he told of Logistics with the Air Force said. the senators, “particularly in aviation, in communications Sustainment Center, is retiring. The Army is accepting considerable risk by reducing its and intelligence.” The colonel, who has been stationed end strength while deferring modernization programs and at Tinker twice, has some advice for infrastructure investments, he said. Investments needed in Air Force the new deputy. “For the United States Army, our No. 1 readiness risk is Sequestration was felt throughout the Air Force, the “There’s a ton of issues that you’ll sequestration,” he said. The other service leaders echoed service’s vice chief of staff, Gen. David L. Goldfein, said. be dealing with, a mile wide, a mile that sentiment about their respective branches. “We also broke faith with our airmen, especially our deep,” he said. “Don’t get comfortable civilian airmen,” he said. “When they were furloughed, we in one area because there are numerous Ripple effect of sequestration lost a number of them who decided that if the company was challenges that LG helps the Center The vice chief of naval operations, Navy Adm. Michelle not invested in them, they were not going to stick with the work through.” Howard, said the Navy can maintain a ready fleet through a company.” LG essentially serves as the A2-A10 stable budget and being able to procure and maintain ships The threat of sequestration must be removed, Goldfein staff for AFSC, including operations with certainty. said. Investments are needed in the service, he added, noting and logistics integration, industrial and Howard said she was in the fleet during a round of that the current Air Force is one of the smallest, oldest and operational supply chain management, sequestration. Deployments were canceled and maintenance least ready in its history. nuclear sustainment integration, periods were shifted, she noted. “The fiscal year 17 budget reflects our best effort to process standardization, plans and “The ripple effect of that goes through the years,” the balance capability, capacity and readiness under the topline programming, installations support, admiral said. “You not only lose the maintenance time, but we’ve received,” he said. “We made difficult trades between communications and IT integration, you lose qualification time for people, and that experience readiness today and the critical investment required to the colonel said. set can never be bought back.” modernize for the future against potential adversaries who “It’s an awesome organization,” Howard said the fiscal year 2017 budget request provides continue to close the technological gap.” Colonel Meserve said. “We took the best of many organizations within AFSC to build the LG staff — two- thirds of the LG team came from AF continues to pursue total force integration elements of the AFMC staff and the AF Global Logistics Support Center Secretary of the Air Force and operationally indistinguishable and is located in Dayton Ohio. We Public Affairs from the active force,” said Air Force have a great team in Dayton and here Secretary Deborah Lee James. “This in Oklahoma City.” WASHINGTON (AFNS) -- The Air maximizes our total force and secures He said transitioning the elements of Force continues to make strides toward (our) top priorities of taking care of AFSC from three air logistics centers, total force integration, according to an people, balancing today’s readiness a supply chain center and three air annual report submitted to Congress with tomorrow’s modernization, and base wings to working together under March 4. making every dollar count.” one center commander for the first The report is based on An important part of integration time ever was, and will continue to recommendations from the National is having and employing the same be, a big challenge. The supply chain Commission on the Structure of the equipment. The fielding of the KC-46 community had a head start with the Air Force and focuses on how the Pegasus and F-35 Lightning II is one AFGLSC, but the global integration force structure should be modified example of the service’s commitment to AF-wide has gone to a whole new to best fill current and future mission concurrent and proportional fielding of level, he said. requirements, an area Air Force component force-mix options and new equipment and technology.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • GAO-18-75, Accessible Version, F-35 Aircraft Sustainment
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Committees October 2017 F-35 AIRCRAFT SUSTAINMENT DOD Needs to Address Challenges Affecting Readiness and Cost Transparency Accessible Version GAO-18-75 October 2017 F-35 AIRCRAFT SUSTAINMENT DOD Needs to Address Challenges Affecting Readiness and Cost Transparency Highlights of GAO-18-75, a report to congressional committees Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found The F-35 aircraft represents the future The Department of Defense (DOD) is sustaining over 250 F-35 aircraft (F-35) of tactical aviation for the U.S. military, and plans to triple the fleet by the end of 2021, but is facing sustainment and is DOD’s most expensive weapon challenges that are affecting warfighter readiness (see table). These challenges system, with sustainment costs alone are largely the result of sustainment plans that do not fully include key estimated at more than $1 trillion over requirements or aligned (timely and sufficient) funding. DOD is taking steps to a 60-year life cycle. As the F-35 address some challenges, but without more comprehensive plans and aligned program approaches full-rate funding, DOD risks being unable to fully leverage the F-35’s capabilities and production, DOD is working to deliver sustain a rapidly expanding fleet. an affordable sustainment strategy that is able to meet the needs of the military Table: Key Department of Defense (DOD) Challenges for F-35 Aircraft Sustainment services. This strategy is being tested Key challenge Description as DOD stands up military depots, Limited repair capacity DOD’s capabilities to repair F-35 parts at military depots are 6 years trains personnel, and supports its first at depots behind schedule, which has resulted in average part repair times of 172 operational squadrons—with plans to days—twice the program’s objective (see figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Air & Space Power Journal
    July–August 2013 Volume 27, No. 4 AFRP 10-1 Senior Leader Perspective The Air Advisor ❙ 4 The Face of US Air Force Engagement Maj Gen Timothy M. Zadalis, USAF Features The Swarm, the Cloud, and the Importance of Getting There First ❙ 14 What’s at Stake in the Remote Aviation Culture Debate Maj David J. Blair, USAF Capt Nick Helms, USAF The Next Lightweight Fighter ❙ 39 Not Your Grandfather’s Combat Aircraft Col Michael W. Pietrucha, USAF Building Partnership Capacity by Using MQ-9s in the Asia-Pacific ❙ 59 Col Andrew A. Torelli, USAF Personnel Security during Joint Operations with Foreign Military Forces ❙ 79 David C. Aykens Departments 101 ❙ Views The Glass Ceiling for Remotely Piloted Aircraft ❙ 101 Lt Col Lawrence Spinetta, PhD, USAF Funding Cyberspace: The Case for an Air Force Venture Capital Initiative ❙ 119 Maj Chadwick M. Steipp, USAF Strategic Distraction: The Consequence of Neglecting Organizational Design ❙ 129 Col John F. Price Jr., USAF 140 ❙ Book Reviews Master of the Air: William Tunner and the Success of Military Airlift . 140 Robert A. Slayton Reviewer: Frank Kalesnik, PhD Selling Air Power: Military Aviation and American Popular Culture after World War II . 142 Steve Call Reviewer: Scott D. Murdock From Lexington to Baghdad and Beyond: War and Politics in the American Experience, 3rd ed . 144 Donald M. Snow and Dennis M. Drew Reviewer: Capt Chris Sanders, USAF Beer, Bacon, and Bullets: Culture in Coalition Warfare from Gallipoli to Iraq . 147 Gal Luft Reviewer: Col Chad T. Manske, USAF Global Air Power . 149 John Andreas Olsen, editor Reviewer: Lt Col P.
    [Show full text]
  • Hill Air Force Base in the 2010S
    80 YEARS OF EXCELLENCE HILL AIR FORCE BASE IN THE 2010S March 26, 2010 July 16, 2010 March 24, 2011 May 26, 2011 October 2011 January 11, 2012 July 2012 The Ogden Air Logistics Center’s (OO-ALC) 309th Maintenance Assigned to the 388th Fighter Wing since the Vietnam The 309th Maintenance Wing formally assumed TSgt Kristoffer Solesbee, from the 775th Civil Engineering The 309th Aerospace Maintenance and Ogden Air Logistics Center and 309th Maintenance Air Force Materiel Command (AFMC) restructured Wing celebrated the completion of the Common Configuration conflict, the 34th Fighter Squadron inactivated as part depot-level, airframe maintenance work for the T-38 Squadron Explosive Ordnance Disposal Flight, died as Regeneration Group (AMARG) eliminated Wing senior leadership held a ribbon-cutting ceremony its Centers across the command. This included the Implementation Program (CCIP) with a rollout ceremony of the Air Force’s move to draw down F-16 forces in Talon. The 571st Aircraft Maintenance Squadron at a result of an Improvised Explosive Devise (IED) attack the first of the 39 B-52Gs scheduled for for the second phase of Building 674, the new F-22 activation of the Air Force Sustainment Center (AFSC), for the last aircraft to receive this upgrade. CCIP improved preparation for the F-35 spin-up. Randolph AFB, Texas, assumed the workload from in Kandahar Province, Afghanistan, while deployed in destruction to meet New Strategic Arms heavy maintenance facility and composite back shop. the new headquarters of the re-designated Ogden Air the F-16’s combat effectiveness and made maintenance and Lear Siegler (LSI) contractors.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Force Pricelist As of 3/1/2011
    Saunders Military Insignia PO BOX 1831 Naples, FL 34106 (239) 776-7524 FAX (239) 776-7764 www.saundersinsignia.com [email protected] Air Force Pricelist as of 3/1/2011 Product # Name Style Years Price 1201 Air Force Branch Tape Patch, sew on, Black 3.00 1216 AVG Blood Chit Flying Tigers Silk 20.00 1218 Desert Storm Chit Silk 8/1990-Current 38.00 1219 Korean War Chit Silk 38.00 1301 336th Fighter Squadron USAF F-15E Fighter Color Patch 10.00 1305 F15E Fighter Weapons School Patch 10.00 1310 EB66 100 Missions Patch 9.00 1311 129th Radio Squadron Mobile Patch, subdued 3.50 1313 416th Bombardment Wing Patch 9.00 1314 353rd Combat Training Squadron Patch 6.50 1315 Air Education and Training Command InstructorPatch 6.50 1317 45th Fighter Squadron USAF Fighter Patch Color 10.00 1318 315th Special Operations Wing Patch 9.00 1321 1st Fighter Wing (English) Patch, Handmade 9.00 1326 100th Fighter Squadron USAF Fighter Patch Color 10.00 1327 302nd Fighter Squadron USAF Fighter Patch Color 23.00 1328 48th Tactical Fighter Squadron USAF Fighter Patch Color 7.50 1329 332nd Fighter Group Patch 10.00 1330 20th Fighter Wing Patch, desert subdued 7.50 1331 21st Special Operations Squadron KnifePatch 6.50 1333 Areospace Defense Command GoosebayPatch Lab 4.00 1335 60th Fighter Squadron USAF Fighter Patch Color 9.00 1336 Spectre AC130 Patch 9.00 1338 Spectre Patience Patch 8.00 1339 162nd Fighter Gp Int Patch 10.00 1341 442nd Tactical Fighter Training SquadronPatch (F111) 8.00 1342 21st Special Operations Squadron patch 7.50 1346 522nd Tactical Fighter Squadron Patch, subdued 3.00 1347 Doppler 1984 Flt.
    [Show full text]
  • Is the USAF Flying Force Large Enough? Assessing Capacity Demands in Four Alternative Futures
    C O R P O R A T I O N Is the USAF Flying Force Large Enough? Assessing Capacity Demands in Four Alternative Futures Alan J. Vick, Paul Dreyer, John Speed Meyers For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR2500 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0072-7 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2018 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface The 1997 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) directed the Department of Defense to conduct a systematic review of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • JAPCC Journal Ed. 23
    Spring /Summer 2017 The Journal of the JAPCC – Transforming Joint Air Power Air Joint Transforming – Journal of the JAPCC The Edition 24, Spring /Summer 2017 PAGE 6 PAGE 11 PAGE 28 The JAPCC Interview Hypersonic Vehicles Future Battlefi eld with Major General Game Changers for Rotorcraft Capability Max A. L. T. Nielsen Future Warfare? Part 1: Analysing the Edition 24 Edition Chief of Air Staff , Future Operating Environment Defence Command Denmark NATO’S PARTNER FOR COLLECTIVE DEFENCE • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • As NATO’s trusted partner ThalesRaytheonSystems provides Europe’s first-ever Integrated Air and Ballistic Missile Defence Command and Control System. ThalesRaytheonSystems’ unique international experience working in concert with an industrial network from NATO 15 Nations, make it the most reliable partner to lead NATO’s evolving Air C2 efforts and to expand BMD programme to include all European territory. PubThalesRaytheonSystem_DefenseMattersA4_EXE.indd 1 22/05/2017 15:32 Editorial NATO’S PARTNER FOR It is our great pleasure to present the 24th Edition between nations, based on lessons learned in COLLECTIVE DEFENCE of the JAPCC Journal. A prominent theme per­ Oper ation Unified Protector. This is a major step meating this journal is the significance of the Joint in the development of non­US AAR capacity across Strike Fighter arriving in many NATO Allies’ national NATO, and both of these programs are significant forces. Starting off, Major General Max A. L. T. force multipliers for the
    [Show full text]
  • Hill Air Force Base in the 1990S
    80 YEARS OF EXCELLENCE HILL AIR FORCE BASE IN THE 1990S March 30, 1990 June 23, 1990 August 2, 1990 August 1990 January 17, 1991 November 4, 1991 February 1992 Hill Air Force Base’s Ogden Air Logistics Center (OO-ALC) Hill AFB’s 50th Anniversary Open House and Air Iraq invaded Kuwait, which The 388th Tactical Fighter Wing (TFW) deployed its 4th and 421st Tactical The 388th Tactical Fighter Wing (Provisional) The first Soviet inspection team arrived at Hill AFB to Signifying the end of an era, Hill AFB shifted from received program management responsibility for the Show showcased the U.S. Air Force’s Thunderbirds prompted Operation Desert Shield. Fighter Squadrons to the Middle East in support of Operation Desert began support of Operation Desert Storm by participate in a two-day Intercontinental Ballistic Missile applying the Cold War camouflage paint scheme on the 2,000-pound combined effects munition (BLU-109). and an F-117 Stealth Fighter, attracting a record Shield. This deployment of two fighter squadrons took sixteen hours launching its first combat mission against Iraqi (ICBM) Technical Characteristics Exhibition, a preliminary C-130 to the flat gray paint scheme adopted as the new crowd of 330,000 people. of non-stop flight with 10 in-flight refueling operations, five of those at forces, flown by 24 F-16Cs. In total, the unit flew phase of the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START). standard by Military Airlift Command (MAC). night. This set a record as the longest distance flown nonstop in the F-16. 3,944 sorties in support of the operation.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Lightning Ii Jet
    - A 27-PAGE CELEBRATION F 35OF LOCKHEED MARTIN’S SPECIAL LIGHTNING II JET “Fighting in the F-35 is like going into a boxing match and your opponent doesn’t even know you’re in the ring yet!” F-35 pilot Scott ‘Mox’ Williams, RAF “More like a Tesla” Czech Air Force USAF pilot compares F-35 NATO ally safeguarding and F-16 technologies the West’s Russian fl ank Offi cially the world’s number-one authority on military aviation F SPECIAL ISSUE Ultimate PAGES OF ANALYSIS & INSIGHT Weapon What makes the F-35 Lightning II so formidable? • Unmatched situational awareness • Nuclear-ready weapons bay Cheap & deadly • State-of-the-art networking AMX A-1 • Global interoperability fi ghter • Electronic warfare • Invisible to radar £4.99 UK Special Forces’ air transport Issue 390 September 2020 RNLAF 298 CHINOOK LEONARDO’S PORTUGAL’S TOP VERSATILE SQN’S 75TH BIRTHDAY BIG UK PLANS TRAINING SQN A330 PHÉNIX F-35 SPECIAL F-35 Gallery Thrust vectoring to land This rear view of Royal Air Force F-35B ZM140 ‘006’ provides a good view of the three-bearing swivel duct nozzle of the short take-o and vertical landing (STOVL) variant. For conventional flight, the nozzle allows thrust from the P&W F135 engine to be vectored directly aft, but can be angled downwards for STOVL operations. Paul Easton Arming the F-35 Ground crew prepare to load a GBU-12 laser-guided bomb into the weapons bay of a US Air Force F-35A operated by the 388th Fighter Wing’s 34th Fighter Squadron ‘Rude Rams’ at Hill Air Force Base, Utah.
    [Show full text]
  • Fourth Norwegian F-35A Delivered to Luke
    NEWS F-35 IN ASSOCIATION WITH New F-35 Fourth Norwegian F-35A Delivered to Luke Cost Cutting Initiatives TWO INITIATIVES with industry to reduce F-35 production and sustainment costs were announced by the US Department of Defence on July 11. The first is a two-year extension of the ‘Blueprint for Affordability for Production’ programme announced in 2014 and the second is the creation of a similar concept to reduce the operation and sustainment costs of Above: The fourth Royal Norwegian Air Force (RNoAF) F-35A 5110 shortly after arriving at Luke AFB, Arizona. Finn K the F-35 weapon system. Hannestad/Norwegian Defence Attaché Washington DC They are built upon the A FOURTH F-35A Lightning II taken place, although it has November 10 last year, when US government’s Better has been delivered to the Royal not previously been reported. they were flown in from the Buying Power initiatives. Norwegian Air Force (RNoAF) This was the fourth production factory in Fort Worth, Texas – The F-35 Blueprint for at Luke Air Force Base, Arizona. aircraft, 5111 (AM-04, USAF/ see Norway’s First Two F-35As Affordability for Production The aircraft, 5110 (AM-03, USAF/ 14-5111), which had made its Delivered to Luke AFB, January, programme is a shared 14-5110), the third production maiden flight on June 9 at Fort p11. All four are currently commitment between aircraft for the RNoAF, arrived Worth, Texas. It is not known training with the US Air Force’s government and industry at the base on July 27.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Force World
    Air Force World screenshot 07.15.2015 An Atlas V rocket boosts GPS IIF-10 into space from Cape Canaveral AFS, Fla. This year marks the 20th anniversary of the GPS system achiev- ing full operational capability. 12 AIR FORCE Magazine / August 2015 By Aaron M. U. Church, Associate Editor SpaceX Still in Play SpaceX is still eligible to compete for national security space missions even though one of its Falcon 9 rockets exploded on June 28, Space and Missile Systems Center boss Lt. Gen. Samuel A. Greaves told Reuters. “SpaceX remains certified and can compete for the upcoming GPS III launch service,” Greaves told the wire service. The rocket was on a commercial mission carrying sup- plies to the International Space Station when it experienced an “anomaly,” SpaceX officials said. According to SpaceX Chief Executive Officer Elon Musk, a support strut failed in the Falcon 9 and most likely triggered the explosion. SpaceX is also looking at other factors that may have caused the mishap. The GPS III launch will be the first time United Launch Alliance will face competition for NSS missions since the Lockheed Martin and Boeing consortium was formed in 2006. SpaceX was certified in May after a two-year review. Ghostrider Grounded The Air Force’s prototype AC-130J Ghostrider gunship was grounded pending investigation of an in-flight incident that occurred during a test sortie from Eglin AFB, Fla., earlier this year, according to Air Force Materiel Command. United Launch Alliance photo AIR FORCE Magazine / August 2015 13 Ai F r c e o r l d U S AF h o to y S gt.Al e x a n d r e o n te s Go Fly a Kite: A1C Jonathan Palacios-Conde and SrA.
    [Show full text]
  • Arnold Air Force Base
    PRSRT STD US POSTAGE PAID TULLAHOMA TN Vol. 64, No. 17 Arnold AFB, Tenn. PERMIT NO. 29 September 5, 2017 Joint partnership leads to successful swirl distortion testing By Deidre Ortiz AEDC Public Affairs An AEDC test team and mem- bers of the U.S. Air Force Academy (USAFA) initiated a project in 2011 at the Academy’s F109 turbofan test facility applying swirl distortion to the determination of engine response in terms of aeromechanics, operabil- ity and performance. In June of this year, the AEDC test team returned to the F109 test facility and conducted a test using a fully functional and automatic swirl generator prototype to determine the response of the F109 engine to swirl with and without pressure distortion. A set of pre-test predications were also computed that aided in test plan- ning and provided guidance in the test process to determine the best ex- penditure of test resources. Dr. Milt Davis, Technology Tran- sition Manager with the AEDC Test and Analysis Branch, explained that the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) S-16 Committee, also known as the Turbine Engine Inlet Flow Dis- tortion Committee, has been provid- ing methodologies and standards for the aircraft and engine community to An AEDC test team and members of the U.S. Air Force Academy (USAFA) partnered together recently at the Academy’s F109 use in testing and analyzing inlet dis- turbofan test facility to apply swirl distortion to determine engine response in terms of aeromechanics, operability and per- formance. Testing was performed July 2017 using a fully functional and automatic swirl generator prototype to determine tortion effects on gas turbine engines the response of the F109 engine to swirl with and without pressure distortion.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Force Senior Leader Panel
    Air Force Senior Leader Panel U. S. Air Force Academy Class of 1988 30th Reunion LIEUTENANT GENERAL JACQUELINE D. VAN OVOST Lt. Gen. Jacqueline D. Van Ovost is the Director of Staff, Headquarters Air Force, the Pentagon, Arlington, Virginia. In this role, she synchronizes and integrates policy, plans, positions, procedures and cross functional issues for the headquarters staff. Prior to assuming her current position, General Van Ovost was the Vice Director, Joint Staff, the Pentagon, Arlington, Virginia. In this role, she assisted the Director of the Joint Staff and provided oversight to Joint Staff support activities, including administration and action management, budget, support services and security. General Van Ovost has commanded an air refueling squadron, flying training wing, and the Presidential Airlift Wing. She also served as the Director of Mobility Forces, U.S. Central Command, and as the Vice Commander, U.S. Air Force Expeditionary Center. General Van Ovost graduated from the U.S. Air Force Academy in 1988. She is a graduate of the U.S. Air Force Test Pilot School and a command pilot with more than 4,200 hours in over 30 aircraft including the C–32A, C–17A, C– 141B and KC–135R. EDUCATION 1988 Bachelor of Science in aeronautical engineering, U.S. Air Force Academy, Colorado Springs, Colo. 1994 U.S. Air Force Test Pilot School, Edwards Air Force Base, Calif. 1996 Squadron Officer School, Maxwell AFB, Ala. 1996 Master of Science, Mechanical Engineering, California State University, Fresno 1999 Master of Military Arts and Sciences, Air Command and Staff College, Maxwell AFB, Ala. 2004 Master of Strategic Studies, Air War College, Maxwell AFB, Ala.
    [Show full text]