DOCSLIB.ORG

A US Strategy for Iran Douglass and Hays Cut Along Dotted Line

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A US Strategy for Iran Douglass and Hays Cut Along Dotted Line Brig Gen Kenneth Newton Walker Kenneth Walker enlisted at Denver, Colorado, on 15 December 1917. He took flying training at Mather Field, California, getting his com- mission and wings in November 1918. After a tour in the Philippines, he returned to Langley Field, Virginia, in February 1925 with a subsequent assignment in December 1928 to attend the Air Corps Tactical School. Retained on the faculty as a bombardment in- structor, Walker became the epitome of the strategic thinkers at the school and coined the revolutionary airpower “creed of the bomber”: “A well-planned, well-organized and well-flown air force attack will constitute an offensive that cannot be stopped.” Following attendance at the Command and General Staff School at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, in 1933 and promotion to major, he served for three years at Hamilton Field, California, and another three years at Luke Field, Ford Island, and Wheeler Field, Hawaii. Walker returned to the United States in January 1941 as assistant chief of the Plans Division for the chief of the Air Corps in Washington, DC. He was promoted to lieutenant colonel in July 1941 and colonel in March 1942. During this time, when he worked in the Operations Division of the War Department General Staff, he coauthored the air-campaign strategy known as Air War Plans Division—Plan 1, the plan for organizing, equipping, deploying, and employing the Army Air Forces to defeat Germany and Japan should the United States become embroiled in war. The authors completed this monumental undertaking in less than one month, just before Japan at- tacked Pearl Harbor—and the United States was, in fact, at war. In June 1942, he was promoted to brigadier general and assigned by Gen George Kenney as commander of Fifth Air Force’s Bomber Command. In this capacity, he repeatedly accompanied his B-24 and B-17 units on bombing missions deep into enemy-held territory. Learning firsthand about combat conditions, he developed a highly efficient technique for bombing when air- craft faced opposition by enemy fighter planes and antiaircraft fire. General Walker was killed in action on 5 January 1943 while leading a bombing mission over Rabaul, New Britain—the hottest target in the theater. He was awarded the Medal of Honor. Its citation, in part, reads, “In the face of extremely heavy anti aircraft fire and determined opposition by enemy fighters, General Walker led an effective daylight bombing attack against shipping in the harbor at Rabaul, which resulted in direct hits on nine enemy vessels. During this action, his airplane was disabled and forced down by the attack of an overwhelming number of enemy fighters. He displayed conspicu- ous leadership above and beyond the call of duty involving personal valor and intrepidity at an extreme hazard to life.” Walker is credited with being one of the men who built an organization that became the US Air Force. After you have read this research report, please give us your frank opinion on the contents. All comments—large or small, complimentary or caustic—will be gratefully appreciated. Mail them to AFOPEC/FO, 325 Chennault Circle, Maxwell AFB AL 36112-6006. A US Strategy for Iran Douglass and Hays Cut along dotted line Thank you for your assistance. AIR UNIVERSITY AIR FORCE OFFICER ProfessionaL EDUCATION CENTER AIR FORCE FELLOWS A US Strategy for Iran CHARLES A. DOUGLASS Lieutenant Colonel, USAF MICHAEL D. HAYS Lieutenant Colonel, USAF Walker Paper No. 11 Air University Press Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama 36112-5962 April 2008 Muir S. Fairchild Research Information Center Cataloging Data Douglass, Charles A. A US strategy for Iran / Charles A. Douglass. Michael D. Hays. p. : cm. – (Walker paper, 1555-7871 ; no. 11) Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 978-1-58566-200-5 1. United States—Foreign relations—Iran. 2. Iran—Foreign relations—United States. 3. Iran—Foreign relations—History. 4. Iran—Strategic aspects. I. Title. II. Hays, Michael D., 1965- III. Series. 327.73055—dc22 Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of Air University, the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or any other US government agency. Cleared for public release: distribution unlimited. This Walker Paper and others in the series are available electronically at the Air University Research Web site http://research.maxwell.af.mil and the AU Press Web site http://aupress.maxwell.af.mil. ii Air Force Fellows Since 1958 the Air Force has assigned a small number of carefully chosen, experienced officers to serve one-year tours at distinguished civilian institutions studying national security policy and strategy. Beginning with the 1994 academic year, these programs were accorded in-residence credit as part of professional military education at senior service schools. In 2003 these fellowships assumed senior developmental educa- tion (SDE) force-development credit for eligible officers. The SDE-level Air Force Fellows serve as visiting military am- bassadors to their centers, devoting effort to expanding their colleagues’ understanding of defense matters. As such, candi- dates for SDE-level fellowships have a broad knowledge of key Department of Defense (DOD) and Air Force issues. SDE-level fellows perform outreach by their presence and voice in spon- soring institutions. They are expected to provide advice as well as promote and explain Air Force and DOD policies, programs, and military-doctrine strategy to nationally recognized scholars, foreign dignitaries, and leading policy analysts. The Air Force Fellows also gain valuable perspectives from the exchange of ideas with these civilian leaders. SDE-level fellows are expected to apprise appropriate Air Force agencies of significant develop- ments and emerging views on defense as well as economic and foreign policy issues within their centers. Each fellow is ex- pected to use the unique access she or he has as grounds for research and writing on important national security issues. The SDE Air Force Fellows include the National Defense Fellows, the RAND Fellows, the National Security Fellows, and the Sec- retary of Defense Corporate Fellows. In addition, the Air Force Fellows program supports a post-SDE military fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. On the level of intermediate developmental education, the chief of staff approved several Air Force Fellowships focused on career broadening for Air Force majors. The Air Force Legisla- iii AIR FORCE FELLOWS tive Fellows program was established in April 1995, with the Foreign Policy Fellowship and Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Fellowship coming under the Air Force Fellows program in 2003. In 2004 the Air Force Fellows also assumed responsibility for the National Laboratories Technologies Fellows. iv Contents Chapter Page DISCLAIMER . ii FOREWORD . vii ABOUT THE AUTHORS . ix ABSTRACT . xiii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . xv 1 SOLVING IRAN . 1 Note . 3 2 IRAN’S PERCEPTIONS AND PATTERNS: HISTORIC ROOTS . 5 Ancient Persian Greatness and Cultural Pride . 5 Resentment of Foreign Interference . 7 Persian-Shiite Strategic Loneliness . 10 Pragmatic National Interest Replaces Revolutionary Ideology . 13 Notes . 17 3 ANALYSIS OF IRAN . 23 Demographics, Politics, and Economics . 24 Internal Dynamics, Personalities, Power Centers, and Factions . 32 Nuclear Desire . 40 Notes . 43 4 US PERCEPTIONS . 49 US Perceptions of Iran Internally . 49 US Perceptions of Iran Externally . 51 Notes . 54 5 REVIEW OF RECENT US POLICY . 57 Dual Containment . 57 Post–9/11 Openings . 59 Public Diplomacy and Sanctions . 60 Notes . 65 v CONTENTS Chapter Page 6 STRATEGY GROUNDWORK . 69 Key Assumptions . 69 US Goal Assessment . 70 Centers of Gravity Overview . 71 Planning Mechanics . 72 Notes . 73 7 A US STRATEGY FOR IRAN . 75 Short-Term Strategy . 76 Long-Term Strategy . 89 Notes . 93 8 CONCLUSIONS . 97 Note . 98 BIBLIOGRAPHY . 99 Illustrations Figure 1 Persia’s Achaemenid Empire as of 500 BC . 6 2 Iran’s formal power centers and constitutional structure . 24 3 Current members of the Gulf Cooperation Council . 62 4 Southern tier of the former Soviet Republics . 63 5 World oil reserves as of 2004 . 79 vi Foreword Arguably a top tier concern for American foreign policy for more than a few years, Iran gets the meticulous attention of two distinguished Air Force scholars. Lt Cols Charles A. Douglass and Michael D. Hays are critical of the current American policy toward Iran and tell us why. More importantly, they point to elements necessary for an effective Iranian strategy. Their aim: “to change the fundamental calculus of the Iranian problem” to one beneficial for both Americans and Iranians. Their calculation is based on the need to solve long-standing problems and recognition that a solution involves more than just a prescriptive mixing of incentives, coercion, and the threat of military attack. A long view must recognize the historical pride of the Persian people, their resentment of foreign meddling (es- pecially by the United States), and the vigor of their Shiite reli- gion, but also the endemic pragmatism of their nationalism. In two insightful chapters, the authors review Persian heritage and analyze current Iranian demographics, politics, and economy. Colonels Douglass and Hays examine current US policies and the changing range of recent policies, from containment, to direct dialogue following 9/11, to the current practice of a very public diplomacy with the threat of punitive sanctions. They point out that the United States has not been successful in stopping Iran’s nuclear program, its export of terrorism, nor the general Iranian practice of destabilizing the Middle East. They discuss the mechanics of strategic formulation that takes into account American concerns and the important “centers of gravity” pertinent to Iran. Douglass and Hays conclude their study by introducing in- novative short-term and long-term strategic frameworks based on the assumption that pressure is building for all parties to “do something.” Interestingly, they place employment of Ameri- can military power low on the list of short-term options.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hezbollah's Syrian Quagmire
    Hezbollah’s Syrian Quagmire BY MATTHEW LEVITT ezbollah – Lebanon’s Party of God – is many things. It is one of the dominant political parties in Lebanon, as well as a social and religious movement catering first and fore- Hmost (though not exclusively) to Lebanon’s Shi’a community. Hezbollah is also Lebanon’s largest militia, the only one to maintain its weapons and rebrand its armed elements as an “Islamic resistance” in response to the terms of the Taif Accord, which ended Lebanon’s civil war and called for all militias to disarm.1 While the various wings of the group are intended to complement one another, the reality is often messier. In part, that has to do with compartmen- talization of the group’s covert activities. But it is also a factor of the group’s multiple identities – Lebanese, pan-Shi’a, pro-Iranian – and the group’s multiple and sometimes competing goals tied to these different identities. Hezbollah insists that it is Lebanese first, but in fact, it is an organization that always acts out of its self-interests above its purported Lebanese interests. According to the U.S. Treasury Department, Hezbollah also has an “expansive global network” that “is sending money and operatives to carry out terrorist attacks around the world.”2 Over the past few years, a series of events has exposed some of Hezbollah’s covert and militant enterprises in the region and around the world, challenging the group’s standing at home and abroad. Hezbollah operatives have been indicted for the murder of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri by the UN Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL) in The Hague,3 arrested on charges of plotting attacks in Nigeria,4 and convicted on similar charges in Thailand and Cyprus.5 Hezbollah’s criminal enterprises, including drug running and money laundering from South America to Africa to the Middle East, have been targeted by law enforcement and regulatory agen- cies.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribes and Empire on the Margins of Nineteenth-Century Iran
    publications on the near east publications on the near east Poetry’s Voice, Society’s Song: Ottoman Lyric The Transformation of Islamic Art during Poetry by Walter G. Andrews the Sunni Revival by Yasser Tabbaa The Remaking of Istanbul: Portrait of an Shiraz in the Age of Hafez: The Glory of Ottoman City in the Nineteenth Century a Medieval Persian City by John Limbert by Zeynep Çelik The Martyrs of Karbala: Shi‘i Symbols The Tragedy of Sohráb and Rostám from and Rituals in Modern Iran the Persian National Epic, the Shahname by Kamran Scot Aghaie of Abol-Qasem Ferdowsi, translated by Ottoman Lyric Poetry: An Anthology, Jerome W. Clinton Expanded Edition, edited and translated The Jews in Modern Egypt, 1914–1952 by Walter G. Andrews, Najaat Black, and by Gudrun Krämer Mehmet Kalpaklı Izmir and the Levantine World, 1550–1650 Party Building in the Modern Middle East: by Daniel Goffman The Origins of Competitive and Coercive Rule by Michele Penner Angrist Medieval Agriculture and Islamic Science: The Almanac of a Yemeni Sultan Everyday Life and Consumer Culture by Daniel Martin Varisco in Eighteenth-Century Damascus by James Grehan Rethinking Modernity and National Identity in Turkey, edited by Sibel Bozdog˘an and The City’s Pleasures: Istanbul in the Eigh- Res¸at Kasaba teenth Century by Shirine Hamadeh Slavery and Abolition in the Ottoman Middle Reading Orientalism: Said and the Unsaid East by Ehud R. Toledano by Daniel Martin Varisco Britons in the Ottoman Empire, 1642–1660 The Merchant Houses of Mocha: Trade by Daniel Goffman and Architecture in an Indian Ocean Port by Nancy Um Popular Preaching and Religious Authority in the Medieval Islamic Near East Tribes and Empire on the Margins of Nine- by Jonathan P.
    [Show full text]
  • AFMC Strategic Plan to Help Carry Air Force to Third Offset
    Vol. 74, No. 11 Tinker Air Force Base, Okla. Friday, March 18, 2016 INSIDE AFMC strategic plan to help Sequestration poses biggest threat to carry Air Force to Third Offset readiness, Stacey Geiger military leaders Air Force Materiel Command say Public Affairs Page 2 WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE, Ohio — Agility and innovation are cornerstones of a new Air Force Materiel Command strategic plan that AFSC/LG will deliver war-winning capabilities. Those capabilities deputy retires will propel the Air Force as Page 2 a key element of the future national defense strategy known as the Third Offset. The first “offset” came in the 1950s when the United States looked to tactical nuclear Are you weapons to deter, or offset, Air Force photo by Jim Haseltine prepared? large, conventional forces in Western Europe. The second Lt. Col. George Watkins, 34th Fighter Squadron commander, drops a GBU-12 laser-guided bomb from Base officials an F-35A at the Utah Test and Training Range Feb. 25. The 34th FS is the Air Force’s first combat unit offset came in the 1970s when to employ munitions from the F-35A. offer weather, the Soviet Union achieved active shooter nuclear parity and the U.S. to leverage new technologies autonomous systems and satellite networks, cyber bugs preparedness sought an advantage by turning to offset advances made by human-machine networks. A that infect and take down tips to precision-guided weapons. adversaries in recent years. battlespace of the year 2030 adversaries’ computers and The Third Offset is the It will draw on technologies could see F-35s or a next- Pages 8-9 Department of Defense strategy such as artificial intelligence, generation aircraft linked by See Plan page 5.
    [Show full text]
  • What Literature Knows: Forays Into Literary Knowledge Production
    Contributions to English 2 Contributions to English and American Literary Studies 2 and American Literary Studies 2 Antje Kley / Kai Merten (eds.) Antje Kley / Kai Merten (eds.) Kai Merten (eds.) Merten Kai / What Literature Knows This volume sheds light on the nexus between knowledge and literature. Arranged What Literature Knows historically, contributions address both popular and canonical English and Antje Kley US-American writing from the early modern period to the present. They focus on how historically specific texts engage with epistemological questions in relation to Forays into Literary Knowledge Production material and social forms as well as representation. The authors discuss literature as a culturally embedded form of knowledge production in its own right, which deploys narrative and poetic means of exploration to establish an independent and sometimes dissident archive. The worlds that imaginary texts project are shown to open up alternative perspectives to be reckoned with in the academic articulation and public discussion of issues in economics and the sciences, identity formation and wellbeing, legal rationale and political decision-making. What Literature Knows The Editors Antje Kley is professor of American Literary Studies at FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany. Her research interests focus on aesthetic forms and cultural functions of narrative, both autobiographical and fictional, in changing media environments between the eighteenth century and the present. Kai Merten is professor of British Literature at the University of Erfurt, Germany. His research focuses on contemporary poetry in English, Romantic culture in Britain as well as on questions of mediality in British literature and Postcolonial Studies. He is also the founder of the Erfurt Network on New Materialism.
    [Show full text]
  • GAO-18-75, Accessible Version, F-35 Aircraft Sustainment
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Committees October 2017 F-35 AIRCRAFT SUSTAINMENT DOD Needs to Address Challenges Affecting Readiness and Cost Transparency Accessible Version GAO-18-75 October 2017 F-35 AIRCRAFT SUSTAINMENT DOD Needs to Address Challenges Affecting Readiness and Cost Transparency Highlights of GAO-18-75, a report to congressional committees Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found The F-35 aircraft represents the future The Department of Defense (DOD) is sustaining over 250 F-35 aircraft (F-35) of tactical aviation for the U.S. military, and plans to triple the fleet by the end of 2021, but is facing sustainment and is DOD’s most expensive weapon challenges that are affecting warfighter readiness (see table). These challenges system, with sustainment costs alone are largely the result of sustainment plans that do not fully include key estimated at more than $1 trillion over requirements or aligned (timely and sufficient) funding. DOD is taking steps to a 60-year life cycle. As the F-35 address some challenges, but without more comprehensive plans and aligned program approaches full-rate funding, DOD risks being unable to fully leverage the F-35’s capabilities and production, DOD is working to deliver sustain a rapidly expanding fleet. an affordable sustainment strategy that is able to meet the needs of the military Table: Key Department of Defense (DOD) Challenges for F-35 Aircraft Sustainment services. This strategy is being tested Key challenge Description as DOD stands up military depots, Limited repair capacity DOD’s capabilities to repair F-35 parts at military depots are 6 years trains personnel, and supports its first at depots behind schedule, which has resulted in average part repair times of 172 operational squadrons—with plans to days—twice the program’s objective (see figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Air & Space Power Journal
    July–August 2013 Volume 27, No. 4 AFRP 10-1 Senior Leader Perspective The Air Advisor ❙ 4 The Face of US Air Force Engagement Maj Gen Timothy M. Zadalis, USAF Features The Swarm, the Cloud, and the Importance of Getting There First ❙ 14 What’s at Stake in the Remote Aviation Culture Debate Maj David J. Blair, USAF Capt Nick Helms, USAF The Next Lightweight Fighter ❙ 39 Not Your Grandfather’s Combat Aircraft Col Michael W. Pietrucha, USAF Building Partnership Capacity by Using MQ-9s in the Asia-Pacific ❙ 59 Col Andrew A. Torelli, USAF Personnel Security during Joint Operations with Foreign Military Forces ❙ 79 David C. Aykens Departments 101 ❙ Views The Glass Ceiling for Remotely Piloted Aircraft ❙ 101 Lt Col Lawrence Spinetta, PhD, USAF Funding Cyberspace: The Case for an Air Force Venture Capital Initiative ❙ 119 Maj Chadwick M. Steipp, USAF Strategic Distraction: The Consequence of Neglecting Organizational Design ❙ 129 Col John F. Price Jr., USAF 140 ❙ Book Reviews Master of the Air: William Tunner and the Success of Military Airlift . 140 Robert A. Slayton Reviewer: Frank Kalesnik, PhD Selling Air Power: Military Aviation and American Popular Culture after World War II . 142 Steve Call Reviewer: Scott D. Murdock From Lexington to Baghdad and Beyond: War and Politics in the American Experience, 3rd ed . 144 Donald M. Snow and Dennis M. Drew Reviewer: Capt Chris Sanders, USAF Beer, Bacon, and Bullets: Culture in Coalition Warfare from Gallipoli to Iraq . 147 Gal Luft Reviewer: Col Chad T. Manske, USAF Global Air Power . 149 John Andreas Olsen, editor Reviewer: Lt Col P.
    [Show full text]
  • Avoiding Another War Between Israel and Hezbollah
    COUNTING THE COST Avoiding Another War between Israel and Hezbollah By Nicholas Blanford and Assaf Orion “He who wishes to fight must first count the cost.” Sun Tzu, The Art of War ABOUT THE SCOWCROFT MIDDLE EAST SECURITY INITIATIVE The Atlantic Council’s Scowcroft Middle East Security Initiative honors the legacy of Brent Scowcroft and his tireless efforts to build a new security architecture for the region. Our work in this area addresses the full range of security threats and challenges including the danger of interstate warfare, the role of terrorist groups and other nonstate actors, and the underlying security threats facing countries in the region. Through all of the Council’s Middle East programming, we work with allies and partners in Europe and the wider Middle East to protect US interests, build peace and security, and unlock the human potential of the region. You can read more about our programs at www.atlanticcouncil.org/ programs/middle-east-programs/. May 2020 ISBN-13: 978-1-61977-099-7 This report is written and published in accordance with the Atlantic Council Policy on Intellectual Independence. The authors are solely responsible for its analysis and recommendations. The Atlantic Council and its donors do not determine, nor do they necessarily endorse or advocate for, any of this report’s conclusions. This report is made possible by general support to the Atlantic Council’s Middle East Programs. COUNTING THE COST Avoiding Another War between Israel and Hezbollah CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Chapter 1
    Notes Introduction 1. Thomas S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed. (Chicago: Univer- sity of Chicago Press, 1970). 2. Ralph Pettman, Human Behavior and World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1975); Giandomenico Majone, Evidence, Argument, and Persuasion in the Policy Process (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1989), 275– 76. 3. Bernard Lewis, “The Return of Islam,” Commentary, January 1976; Ofira Seliktar, The Politics of Intelligence and American Wars with Iraq (New York: Palgrave Mac- millan, 2008), 4. 4. Martin Kramer, Ivory Towers on Sand: The Failure of Middle Eastern Studies in Amer- ica (Washington, DC: Washington Institute for Near East Policy, 2000). 5. Bernard Lewis, “The Roots of Muslim Rage,” Atlantic Monthly, September, 1990; Samuel P. Huntington, “The Clash of Civilizations,” Foreign Affairs 72 (1993): 24– 49; Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of the World Order (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1996). Chapter 1 1. Quoted in Joshua Muravchik, The Uncertain Crusade: Jimmy Carter and the Dilemma of Human Rights (Lanham, MD: Hamilton Press, 1986), 11– 12, 114– 15, 133, 138– 39; Hedley Donovan, Roosevelt to Reagan: A Reporter’s Encounter with Nine Presidents (New York: Harper & Row, 1985), 165. 2. Charles D. Ameringer, U.S. Foreign Intelligence: The Secret Side of American History (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1990), 357; Peter Meyer, James Earl Carter: The Man and the Myth (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1978), 18; Michael A. Turner, “Issues in Evaluating U.S. Intelligence,” International Journal of Intelligence and Counterintelligence 5 (1991): 275– 86. 3. Abram Shulsky, Silent Warfare: Understanding the World’s Intelligence (Washington, DC: Brassey’s [US], 1993), 169; Robert M.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran's Ambiguous Role in Afghanistan
    MARCH 2010 . VOL 3 . ISSUE 3 garments, typically under a waistcoat so families of the bombers rejoice over the it is properly concealed. The orange color martyrdom mission, and some mothers Iran’s Ambiguous Role in detonation cord connects the explosives wear new black dresses to greet local Afghanistan vest or jacket to the striker sleeve, women after the death of their son. One which is adhered to the bomber’s left- bomber, however, explained that while By Sajjan M. Gohel hand wrist with duct tape. On reaching the mother of the bomber is typically the target, the ring of the striker sleeve sad, they cannot overtly express their iran is playing a pivotal role in is pulled with the right hand and the true feelings due to threats from the Afghanistan’s post-Taliban development. blast occurs. There is no evidence of any Taliban. It is a large source of foreign direct intoxicant administered to the suicide investment, and provides assistance bombers before the attack. Also, contrary to the general public’s in critical national infrastructure, perception, the Taliban do not regularly road construction, distribution of Since suicide bombers often either abort pay compensation to the families of energy supplies, and agricultural and their missions or are arrested before suicide bombers after an attack.47 Any communications development. Iran they can detonate their explosives, they posthumous compensation package is also shares ethnic, linguistic and have been able to narrate their pre- largely a myth. In some cases, when religious links with millions of Afghan attack emotions. The bombers’ felt no the parents of a bomber are extremely Shi`a.
    [Show full text]
  • Khomeinism, the Islamic Revolution and Anti Americanism
    Khomeinism, the Islamic Revolution and Anti Americanism Mohammad Rezaie Yazdi A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham For the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of Political Science and International Studies University of Birmingham March 2016 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract The 1979 Islamic Revolution of Iran was based and formed upon the concept of Khomeinism, the religious, political, and social ideas of Ayatullah Ruhollah Khomeini. While the Iranian revolution was carried out with the slogans of independence, freedom, and Islamic Republic, Khomeini's framework gave it a specific impetus for the unity of people, religious culture, and leadership. Khomeinism was not just an effort, on a religious basis, to alter a national system. It included and was dependent upon the projection of a clash beyond a “national” struggle, including was a clash of ideology with that associated with the United States. Analysing the Iran-US relationship over the past century and Khomeini’s interpretation of it, this thesis attempts to show how the Ayatullah projected "America" versus Iranian national freedom and religious pride.
    [Show full text]
  • London Middle East Institute at SOAS
    London Middle East LONDON Institute at SOAS MIDDLE EAST INSTITUTE Annual Report 2014/2015 and Financial Report 2013/2014 LMEI ORGANISATION AND MEMBERSHIP Staff of the London Middle East Donations, Sponsorship and Affiliations Institute Founding Patron and Donor of the LMEI Director: Dr Hassan Hakimian Sheikh Mohamed Bin Issa Al Jaber, Executive Officer and Company Secretary: MBI Al Jaber Foundation Ms Louise Hosking Events and Magazine Coordinator: Corporate Sponsor Mr Vincenzo Paci MENA Regional Consulting Limited (MENARC) Administrative Assistant: Ms Valentina Zanardi Coordinating Editor (Middle East in London Institutional Affiliates Magazine): Ms Megan Wang Aga Khan University (International) Institute for Designer (Middle East in London Magazine): the Study of Muslim Civilisations Ms Shahla Geramipour The Arab-British Centre Bonyad Jaleh Esfahani British Foundation for the Study of Arabia (BFSA) The British-Yemeni Society Centre for Supporters of Human Rights LMEI Board of Trustees Forum Iran LSE Middle East Centre Professor Paul Webley (Chair), Naghmeh Ensemble Director, SOAS Petroleum Institute Professor Richard Black, SOAS Poetry and Music Chamber of Iranians in Dr John Curtis, Iran Heritage Foundation the UK Sir Vincent Fean Professor Ben Fortna, SOAS Mr Alan Jenkins Dr Karima Laachir, SOAS Corporate Sponsorship is £1,500 per year. Dr Dina Matar, SOAS Benefits include those enjoyed by Institutional Dr Barbara Zollner, Birkbeck College Affiliates, please see below, together with up to two tailored private briefings per year, free copies of LMEI occasional papers, and special advertising rates with the LMEI. Institutional Affiliation is £250 per year. LMEI Advisory Council Institutional Affiliates are entitled to the same Lady Barbara Judge (Chair) benefits as Individual Affiliates, please see below, Professor Muhammad Abdel-Haleem, SOAS along with the free use of a room at SOAS for an HE Mr Khaled al-Duwaisan GCVO, event lasting up to two hours, and up to four copies Ambassador, Embassy of the State of Kuwait of each edition of the magazine.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pharaohs of Ancient Egypt: Oppressors Or Great
    order • proposal • value • oppressive • revolution • stability SoGen Unit 6.1 social THE PHARAOHS OF studies ANCIENT EGYPT: OPPRESSORS OR GREAT LEADERS? SOCIAL STUDIES ACTIVITIES Session 1 2–3 Reader’s Theater Identifying Different Perspectives and Support Session 2 4–7 Building Background Knowledge Class Discussion Session 3 8–10 Understanding the Pharaohs Session 4 11–12 It’s Debate Time! Session 5 13–14 Writing SUPPLEMENTARY ACTIVITIES FOR OTHER CONTENT AREAS ELA 15 Twitter Revolutions Math 16 Mathematics with Knotted Ropes Science 17 Precautions in the Lab FOCUS WORDS Examining the Focus Words Closely 18 © 2015 SERP SoGen Unit 6.1 1 Session 1 order • proposal • value • oppressive • revolution • stability Reader’s Theater Comparing Parents to Pharaohs Setting: Tiana, Tray, and Ingrid are walking to school together. They stop to pick up their friend Raul. Since he hasn’t been answering their phone calls, Tiana knocks loudly on his door. After a minute, Raul storms out of his house. Raul: I swear! My parents are like…oppressors! Raul: I’m way ahead of you, Tiana. I did suggest going Tiana: What? somewhere more affordable, and my parents said, “No!” Honestly, I think they just want other parents to be Raul: My parents! They act like those people we’ve been impressed because they take their kids to Disney World. studying in social studies, the pharaohs in ancient Egypt. My aunt and uncle took their kids to the Grand Canyon They’re oppressive! last summer and they can’t stop talking about it. My Tiana: So you’re saying that your parents collect taxes parents are doing this just to look good, so they really from you and force you to build pyramids? Right.
    [Show full text]