DOCSLIB.ORG

BIOGRAPHICAL DATA BOO KK Pinnacle Class 2021-2 28 June

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

BBIIOOGGRRAAPPHHIICCAALL DDAATTAA BBOOOOKK Pinnacle Class 2021-2 28 June - 2 July 2021 Pinnacle Fellows Biographies UNITED STATES AIR FORCE LIEUTENANT GENERAL STEVEN L. BASHAM Lt. Gen. Steven L. Basham is the Deputy Commander, U.S. Air Forces in Europe-Air Forces Africa, Ramstein Air Base, Germany. As the air component to U.S. European Command and U.S. Africa Command, USAFE-AFAFRICA is responsible for providing full-spectrum warfighting capabilities to both combatant commanders throughout their area of responsibility, which encompasses 104 countries in Europe, Africa, Asia and the Middle East, the Arctic and Atlantic oceans, and possesses more than a quarter of the world’s population and world’s gross domestic product. Lt. Gen. Basham was commissioned in 1989 through Officer Training School. He has completed numerous flying, staff and command assignments and is a command pilot with more than 3,400 flying hours in the B-1, B-2 and B-52. Prior to his current assignment, the general was the Director, Legislative Liaison, Office of Secretary of the Air Force, the Pentagon, Arlington, Virginia. EDUCATION 1987 Bachelor of Science, Electrical Engineering Technology, Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green 1996 Squadron Officer School, Maxwell Air Force Base, Ala. 1997 Master of Arts, Management, Webster University, Webster Groves, Mo. 2001 Master of Arts, Strategic Studies, Air Command and Staff College, Maxwell AFB, Ala. 2002 Master of Arts, Airpower Art and Science, School of Advanced Air and Space Studies, Maxwell AFB, Ala. 2005 Air War College, Maxwell AFB, Ala., by correspondence 2007 Master of Arts, Strategic Studies, Army War College, Carlisle Barracks, Pa. 2009 U.S. Air Force Enterprise Leadership Seminar, Darden School of Business, University of Virginia, Charlottesville 2011 Senior Manager Course, Elliott School of International Affairs, George Washington University, Washington, D.C. 2012 Seminar for Executives on Legislative Operations, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C. 2014 Combined Force Air Component Commander Course (CFACC), Maxwell AFB, Ala. 2015 Senior Joint Information Operations Applications Course (SJIOAC), Maxwell AFB, Ala. 2015 Combined/Joint Force Land Component Commander Course (CFLCC), Carlisle Barracks, Pa. 2017 Senior Executives in National and International Security (SENIS) Course, Harvard Kennedy School, Cambridge, Mass. ASSIGNMENTS 1. February 1989 - February 1990, Student, Undergraduate Pilot Training, Laughlin Air Force Base, Texas 2. March 1990 - July 1990, Student, B-1 Combat Crew Training Squadron, Dyess AFB, Texas 3. August 1990 - April 1994, B-1 Pilot, Aircraft Commander, T-38 pilot, 46th Bomb Squadron, Grand Forks AFB, N.D. 4. April 1994 - April 1995, B-1 Instructor Pilot, 34th BS, Ellsworth AFB, S.D. 5. April 1995 - August 1998, B-2 Pilot, Mission Commander, Instructor Pilot, Evaluator Pilot, Chief of Scheduling, Chief of Standards and Evaluations, 393rd BS, Whiteman AFB, Mo. 6. August 1998 - June 1999, Flight Commander, 394th Combat Training Squadron, Whiteman AFB, Mo. 7. June 1999 - June 2000, Executive Officer, 509th Bomb Wing, Whiteman AFB, Mo. 8. June 2000 - June 2001, Student, Air Command and Staff College, Maxwell AFB, Ala. https://www.af.mil/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/Print.aspx?PortalId=1&ModuleId=858&Article=467205 1/3 9. July 2001 - June 2002, Student, School of Advanced Air and Space Studies, Maxwell AFB, Ala. 10. July 2002 - May 2004, Director of Operations, 325th BS, Whiteman AFB, Mo. 11. June 2004 - April 2006, Commander, 393rd BS, Whiteman AFB, Mo. 12. April 2006 - June 2006, Director of Staff, 509th BW, Whiteman AFB, Mo. 13. June 2006 - June 2007, Student, Army War College, Carlisle Barracks, Pa. 14. June 2007 - July 2008, Chief, Combat Plans Division, 607th Air Operations Center, Osan Air Base, South Korea 15. July 2008 - March 2009, Vice Commander, 5th BW, Minot AFB, N.D. 16. March 2009 - July 2010, Commander, 2nd BW, Barksdale AFB, La. 17. July 2010 - June 2012, Assistant Deputy Director for Command, Control and Nuclear Operations (J-36), the Joint Staff, the Pentagon, Arlington, Va. 18. June 2012 - May 2013, Chief, House Liaison Office, Office of Legislative Liaison, Washington, D.C. 19. May 2013 - June 2015, Director of Strategy, Plans and Programs, Headquarters Pacific Air Forces, Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii 20. June 2015 - July 2016, Deputy Director of Requirements (J-8), the Joint Staff, the Pentagon, Arlington, Va. 21. July 2016 – April 2019, Director, Legislative Liaison, Office of the Secretary of the Air Force, the Pentagon, Arlington, Va. 22. May 2019 - present, Deputy Commander, U.S. Air Forces in Europe-Air Forces Africa, Ramstein AB, Germany SUMMARY OF JOINT ASSIGNMENTS 1. July 2010 - June 2012, Assistant Deputy Director for Command, Control and Nuclear Operations (J-36), the Joint Staff, the Pentagon, Arlington, Va., as a colonel 2. June 2015 - July 2016, Deputy Director for Requirements, (J-8) the Joint Staff, the Pentagon, Arlington, Va., as a brigadier general FLIGHT INFORMATION Rating: command pilot Flight hours: more than 3,400 Aircraft flown: B-1, B-2, B-52, T-38, T-37 MAJOR AWARDS AND DECORATIONS Air Force Distinguished Service Medal Defense Superior Service Medal with oak leaf cluster Legion of Merit with oak leaf cluster Distinguished Flying Cross Meritorious Service Medal with four oak leaf clusters Air Medal with two oak leaf clusters Air Force Commendation Medal with oak leaf cluster Joint Service Achievement Medal Combat Readiness Medal with four oak leaf clusters Kosovo Campaign Medal Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal Korean Defense Service Medal Nuclear Deterrence Operations Service Medal with N device and four oak leaf clusters EFFECTIVE DATES OF PROMOTION Second Lieutenant Jan. 27, 1989 First Lieutenant Jan. 27, 1991 Captain Jan. 27, 1993 Major July 1, 1999 Lieutenant Colonel March 1, 2002 Colonel Aug. 1, 2007 Brigadier General Aug. 2, 2013 Major General July 3, 2017 Lieutenant General May 1, 2019 (Current as of June 2019) https://www.af.mil/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/Print.aspx?PortalId=1&ModuleId=858&Article=467205 2/3 LIEUTENANT GENERAL SCOTT D. BERRIER UNITED STATES ARMY LTG Scott D. Berrier arrives to DIA as the 22nd Director and came from the Department of the Army where he served as the 46th G-2. In that role, he was the principal military intelligence and counterintelligence adviser to the Secretary and Chief of Staff of the Army, and the Army’s Intelligence Community representative. He is a career intelligence officer having served as the “2” at every level from Battalion to Combatant Command. The depth of his leadership experience ranges from Company Commander to Commanding General and Senior Mission Commander. His Army, Joint Service, and Special Operations assignments include service throughout the United States, the Republic of Korea, Iraq, and Afghanistan. LTG Berrier earned a Bachelor of Science Degree in History from University of Wisconsin – Stevens Point, a Master of Science Degree in General Studies from Central Michigan University, and a Master of Science Degree in Strategic Studies from the United States Army War College. His awards and decorations include the Distinguished Service Medal (1OLC), Defense Superior Service Medal (2OLC), Legion of Merit (1OLC), and Bronze Star Medal (1OLC). LTG Berrier also earned the Parachutist Badge, Air Assault Badge, and Ranger Tab. LTG Berrier and his wife, Annie, began their Army journey in 1987 at Fort Richardson, Alaska. They have two sons, Cole and Connor. Cole and his wife (Mika) currently serve in the office of Senator Brian Schatz. Lieutenant Connor Berrier is a Naval Intelligence Officer serving as the Flag Aide for the Navy N2/6. @ABCÿEFGHÿIPQRSÿTPUFSCÿAVÿPÿWPXAYCÿ`aÿbAWVX`WÿcPSCGdÿe`QXf TPQ`SAWPÿPWFÿPÿghipÿqQPFUPXCÿ`aÿe`QXfÿTPQ`SAWPÿcXPXC rWAYCQVAXRÿsGPqWPÿBUGÿSPUFCtÿuAXfÿPÿFCqQCCÿAWÿTfCGABPS vWqAWCCQAWqHÿwCÿuPVÿB`GGAVVA`WCFÿPaXCQÿPXXCWFAWqÿxyBCQ TPWFAFPXCÿcBf``SÿAWÿeCu`QXdÿf`FCÿVSPWFH ÿ TPUFSCÿf`SFVÿPFYPWBCFÿFCqQCCVÿaQ`GÿXfCÿePYPS `VXqQPFUPXCÿcBf``SdÿPVXCQÿ`aÿcBACWBCÿsFAVXAWBXA`WtÿAW fRVABVÿaQ`GÿxSFÿI`GAWA`WÿrWAYCQVAXRdÿPWFÿPVXCQÿ`a cBACWBCÿAWÿvWqAWCCQAWqÿPWPqCGCWXHÿwCÿPSV`ÿPXXCWFCFÿXfC cBf``Sÿ`aÿEFYPWBCFÿcXUFACVdÿrWAYCQVAXRÿ`aÿf`CWAdÿufCQC fCÿ`XPAWCFÿPÿI`BX`Qÿ`aÿPWPqCGCWXÿAWÿxQqPWAPXA`WPS CPFCQVfAÿuAXfÿPÿVCBAPSAPXA`WÿAWÿWa`QGPXA`WÿcRVXCGV PWFÿCBfW`S`qRH ÿ wAVÿF`BX`QPSÿFAVVCQXPXA`WÿQCVCPQBfÿuPVÿB`WFUBXCFÿ`W GASAXPQRÿFCBAVA`WGPAWqÿUWBCQXPAWXRÿQCqPQFAWqÿXfCÿUVCÿ`a a`QBCÿAWÿBRCQVPBCHÿwCÿAVÿPSV`ÿPÿSABCWVCFÿQ`aCVVA`WPSÿCWqAWCCQH ÿ wAVÿCPQSRÿVCPÿX`UQVÿAWBSUFCFÿPVVAqWGCWXVÿPVÿFAYAVA`Wÿ`yBCQdÿrccÿC`QqCÿbPVfAWqX`WÿTPQYCQÿscceÿpt CWqAWCCQdÿrccÿcX`WCuPSSÿPBV`WÿscceÿtÿCWqAWCCQdÿrccÿcPWFÿPWBCÿscceÿdtÿPWFÿCCBUXAYCÿ`yBCQ `aÿrccÿ`WXCSACQÿscceÿeptH ÿ TPUFSCfVÿgQVXÿB`GGPWFÿPVVAqWGCWXÿuPVÿPVÿB`GGPWFAWqÿ`yBCQÿ`aÿrccÿCaaCQV`WÿTAXRÿscceÿephtH EVÿFCUXRÿB`GGPWFCQdÿcUGPQAWCÿchUPFQ`WÿggdÿfCÿVCQYCFÿPVÿT`GGPWFAWqÿxyBCQÿ`aÿrccÿ`CPÿscce eptÿPWFÿrccÿwCSCWPÿscceÿeiptÿFUCÿX`ÿCGCQqCWXÿS`VVCVÿ`aÿXfCÿW`QGPSSRÿPVVAqWCFÿB`GGPWFAWqÿ`yBCQVH wCÿPSV`ÿB`GGPWFCFÿcUGPQAWCÿchUPFQ`WÿH ÿ wAVÿX`UQVÿPVf`QCÿAWBSUFCÿPVVAqWGCWXVÿPVÿPVVAVXPWXÿa`QBCÿWUBSCPQÿ`uCQÿ`yBCQdÿB`GGPWFCQÿcUGPQAWC j`QBCdÿrHcHÿEXSPWXABÿjSCCXÿxyBCQAWTfPQqCÿ`aÿ``QCFÿQPAWAWqÿcfAÿscÿptÿFCUXRÿB`GGPWFCQÿ`a cUGPQAWCÿchUPFQ`WÿggÿPVVAVXPWXÿFCUXRÿFAQCBX`Qÿa`QÿAWa`QGPXA`WÿPWFÿBRCQVPBCÿ`SABRÿ`WÿXfCÿ`AWX !"#$%&'# ()'# 0 123 !0 14563"#$1667468926 @ABCCÿEFGHIÿPQÿRBSTPQUAVQWÿXY`YaÿBQbÿcTPdCÿVCÿSABCCWÿcVeeBQbdfÿ@gheBfPQdÿiVfcdWÿpY@YÿqBcPrcÿisddAY tPSÿVATdfÿuBUÿBSSPUQedQASÿPQcsgbdÿbdvgAwÿcTPdCÿCVfÿSdcgfPAwÿcVVvdfBAPVQWÿxycdÿVCÿATdÿXdCdQSd dvfdSdQABAPdWÿqBPSABQÿTdfdÿTdÿbPfdcAswÿSgvvVfAdbÿcVBsPAPVQÿCVfcdSÿCVfÿxvdfBAPVQÿQbgfPQUÿifddbVea
Recommended publications
  • Get Ready for Luke Days 2020 by FCP Staff Luke Days, the Premier Air Show in the Phoenix Area, Is Returning March 21-22, 2020

    Get Ready for Luke Days 2020 by FCP Staff Luke Days, the Premier Air Show in the Phoenix Area, Is Returning March 21-22, 2020

    Visions To serveFCP and support the men, women, families and mission of Luke Air Force Base Winter 2018 Get ready for Luke Days 2020 By FCP Staff Luke Days, the premier air show in the Phoenix area, is returning March 21-22, 2020. The U.S. Air Force Thunderbirds demonstration team will headline the free event throughout the two- day show. “Mark your calendars now because we can’t wait to host you in 2020,” Brig. Gen. Todd Canterbury, 56th Fighter Wing commander, said. “Luke Days is our chance to open up our gates and welcome the community on base to see their U.S. military up close. We love hosting you as a small thank you for the amazing support you give us year after year.” More than 250,000 attendees enjoyed the 2018 event, making it one of the most highly-attended events in Arizona. Stay tuned to the Luke Air Force Base social media accounts and website for updates on performers, ap- pearances and other details. Questions can be directed to the Luke AFB Public Affairs Office at 623-856-6011 or [email protected]. mil. Heritage jets fly high in a demonstration at Luke Days 2016. The airshow returns in 2020. (Photo special to FCP Visions) Fighter Country Partnership makes holidays bright for Airman By Bill Johnston ries. These airmen are young; mostly 18 to 20 years Program Director, Fighter Country Partnership old with most of them away from home for the first Tis the Season! That has been the topic of conver- time. This party is simply a positive distraction for sation in the Fighter Country Partnership office these these young men and women.
  • The Smithsonian and the Enola Gay: the Crew

    The Smithsonian and the Enola Gay: the Crew

    AFA’s Enola Gay Controversy Archive Collection www.airforcemag.com The Smithsonian and the Enola Gay From the Air Force Association’s Enola Gay Controversy archive collection Online at www.airforcemag.com The Crew The Commander Paul Warfield Tibbets was born in Quincy, Ill., Feb. 23, 1915. He joined the Army in 1937, became an aviation cadet, and earned his wings and commission in 1938. In the early years of World War II, Tibbets was an outstanding B-17 pilot and squadron commander in Europe. He was chosen to be a test pilot for the B-29, then in development. In September 1944, Lt. Col. Tibbets was picked to organize and train a unit to deliver the atomic bomb. He was promoted to colonel in January 1945. In May 1945, Tibbets took his unit, the 509th Composite Group, to Tinian, from where it flew the atomic bomb missions against Japan in August. After the war, Tibbets stayed in the Air Force. One of his assignments was heading the bomber requirements branch at the Pentagon during the development of the B-47 jet bomber. He retired as a brigadier general in 1966. In civilian life, he rose to chairman of the board of Executive Jet Aviation in Columbus, Ohio, retiring from that post in 1986. At the dedication of the National Air and Space Museum’s Udvar- Hazy Center in December 2003, the 88-year-old Tibbets stood in front of the restored Enola Gay, shaking hands and receiving the high regard of visitors. (Col. Paul Tibbets in front of the Enola Gay—US Air Force photo) The Enola Gay Crew Airplane Crew Col.

  • Digital Literacy’, ‘Fosters Inclusion’ Foundational Competencies Now in Myvector Self-Assessment Tool

    THE SOUND OF FREEDOM | Wednesday, March 10, 2021 | 5 USAFE completes CJADC2 demonstration BY SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PUBLIC AFFAIRS RAMSTEIN AIR BASE, Germany (AFNS) -- U.S. Air Forces in Europe-Air Forces Africa, in conjunction with the Department of the Air Force’s Chief Ar- chitect’s O ce, conducted a Combined, Joint All-Domain Command and Control demonstration in international waters and airspace in and around the Baltic Sea. Participation included assets from U.S. Naval Forces Europe – Africa/U.S. 6th Fleet, U.S. Army Europe – Africa, U.S. Strategic Command, the Royal Air Force, the Royal Netherlands air force and the Polish air force. This demonstration was designed to test and observe the ability of the joint force, our allies and partners to integrate and provide command and control across multiple networks to multiple force capa- bilities. “Conducting a complex and real-world U.S. AIR FORCE PHOTO BY TECH. SGT. EMERSON NUÑEZ focused CJADC2 demonstration allowed A U.S. Air Force F-16 Fighting Falcon assigned to the 555th Fighter Squadron, Aviano Air Base, Italy, is refueled by a KC-135 our joint and allied team to nd areas Stratotanker assigned to the 100th Air Refueling Wing, RAF Mildenhall, United Kingdom, during a mission over the Black Sea, where we can innovate with systems we Jan. 14, 2021. U.S. military operations in the Black Sea enhance regional stability, combined readiness and capability with our already have and also to identify areas NATO allies and partners. where our war ghters need assistance from the Air and Space Forces’ Chief Ar- ported the demonstration.
  • Gen. George Scratchley Brown August 1, 1973–June 30, 1974 Portrait By

    Gen. George Scratchley Brown August 1, 1973–June 30, 1974 Portrait By

    Gen. George Scratchley Brown August 1, 1973–June 30, 1974 Portrait by Maxine McCaffrey EORGE SCRATCHLEY BROWN was born in Montclair, New Jersey, on August 17, 1918. He was the son of a West Point graduate and career cavalry officer. He Ggraduated from high school in Leavenworth, Kansas, and, after attending the Uni- versity of Missouri for a year, he received a congressional appointment to the U.S. Military Academy in 1937. He graduated from West Point in 1941 and entered flight training at Pine Bluff, Arkansas. He received his pilot’s wings at Kelly Field, Texas, in 1942. Following flight training, he went to Barksdale Field, Louisiana, where he became a member of the initial cadre of the 93d Bombardment Group, flying B–24 Liberators. After a brief stint flying antisubmarine patrol at Ft. Myers, Florida, he transferred in August 1942 with the 93d Bombardment Group, the first B–24 group to join the Eighth Air Force in England. Until April 1944 he served in various capacities with the 93d, including commander of the 329th Bombardment Squadron, group operations officer, and group executive officer. As group executive officer, he took part in famous low-level bombing raids against oil refineries at Ploesti, Romania, on August 1, 1943. The 93d was the second of five B–24 groups that raid- ed Ploesti from a temporary base at Benghazi, Libya. Led by its commander, Lt. Col. Addison E. Baker, the 93d flew directly into heavy defenses to hit three of the six targeted refineries. The lead plane and ten others were shot down or crashed on the target.
  • Air Force Glossary

    Air Force Glossary

    AIR FORCE GLOSSARY Air Force Doctrine Document 1-2 11 January 2007 This document supplements the terminology in Joint Publication 1-02, Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms ACCESSIBILITY: Publications are available on the e-Publishing website at www.e-publishing.af.mil for downloading. RELEASABILITY: There are no releasability restrictions on this publication BY ORDER OF THE AIR FORCE DOCTRINE DOCUMENT 1-2 SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE 11 JANUARY 2007 NOTICE: This publication is available on the AFDPO WWW site at http://www.e-publishing.af.mil SUMMARY OF CHANGES Since the 8 June 2006 version the following publications have been revised or developed: AFDD 2 Operations and Organization, AFDD 2-2 Space Operations, AFDD 2-1.3 Counterland Operations, and AFDD 2-1.9 Targeting. NOTE: The Air Force Glossary is accessible on-line at https://www.doctrine.af.mil/Main.asp (fourth selection from bottom left). As terminology changes are published in doctrine they are added to the internet version, making the internet version of the Air Force Glossary more up-to- date. Supersedes: AFDD 1-2, 8 June 2006 OPR: HQ AFDC/DD Certified by: HQ AFDC/DD (Col Jon Wolfe) Pages: 77 Accessibility: Available on the e-publishing website at www.e-publishing.af.mil for downloading Releasability: There are no releasability restrictions on this publication Approved by: Allen G. Peck, Major General, USAF Commander, Air Force Doctrine Center FOREWORD Warfighters require a common lexicon of unique military terms essential to explaining, understanding, and writing doctrine. This common lexicon, reached by familiar definitions, is fundamental to conducting efficient and effective air, space, and cyberspace operations.
  • Der Krieg Gegen Die Bundesrepublik Jugoslawien 1999

    Der Krieg Gegen Die Bundesrepublik Jugoslawien 1999

    Der Krieg gegen die Bundesrepublik Jugoslawien - 24. März bis 10./20. Juni 1999 Inhalt 1. Zum Luftkrieg Verteidiger, Angreifer und die Verluste 2. Zum Hintergrund des Krieges: Literaturtips und einige Beiträge 3. Zu allen Zeiten: Propaganda 4. Die "Helden" der US-Air-Force: 509th Bomb Wing 5. Dokumentierte Abschüsse: F-117-Abschuß durch MiG-21 und Fla-Rakete MiG-29-Abschuß durch F-15 Eagle 6. andere Berichte: Links 1. Zum Luftkrieg Die jugoslawische Luftverteidigung Die jugoslawischen Luftabwehr hatte vorwiegend verschiedene sowjetische Raketensysteme in ihrem Bestand. Die etwa 60 bis 68 selbstfahrenden Systeme SA-6 Kub sollen besonders wirksam gegen tief fliegende Kampfflugzeuge und Raketen in einer Reichweite von 100 bis 200 Kilometern sein. Hinzu kamen noch - in geringen Stückzahlen - bei der Luftverteidigung die SA-8b, SA-9 und SA- 13. Die stationären Systeme SA-2 und SA-3 schützten vor allem die großen Städte, Militäreinrichtungen sowie wichtige Industrieanlagen. Hiervon standen jeweils 60 Abschußvorrichtungen zur Verfügung. Die jugoslawischen Luftstreitkräfte waren in zwei Fliegerkorps, eine Aufklärungsstaffel sowie eine Lufttransportbrigade unterteilt. Die "westlichen" Schätzungen der Stückzahlen an Flugzeugen schwanken zwischen 225 und 252 Maschinen [Zahlendreher?]. Gesichert scheint, zu Beginn des Krieges, der Bestand an 16 MiG-29 (darunter 2 zweisitzige Schulmaschinen) und 60 MiG-21. Die 65 Maschinen der jugoslawisch - rumänischen Koproduktion Soko Orao und die etwa 80 Maschinen vom Typ Galeb G-4 und G-2 sowie Jastreb sind als Trainer und leichte Erdkampfflugzeuge ausgelegt und dürften für Luftverteidigungsaufgaben nur sehr bedingt tauglich gewesen sein. Hinzu kamen rd. 70 Hubschrauber (andere Angaben sprechen von 110 oder gar 180) vom Typ Partizan (ca.
  • AFMC Strategic Plan to Help Carry Air Force to Third Offset

    AFMC Strategic Plan to Help Carry Air Force to Third Offset

    Vol. 74, No. 11 Tinker Air Force Base, Okla. Friday, March 18, 2016 INSIDE AFMC strategic plan to help Sequestration poses biggest threat to carry Air Force to Third Offset readiness, Stacey Geiger military leaders Air Force Materiel Command say Public Affairs Page 2 WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE, Ohio — Agility and innovation are cornerstones of a new Air Force Materiel Command strategic plan that AFSC/LG will deliver war-winning capabilities. Those capabilities deputy retires will propel the Air Force as Page 2 a key element of the future national defense strategy known as the Third Offset. The first “offset” came in the 1950s when the United States looked to tactical nuclear Are you weapons to deter, or offset, Air Force photo by Jim Haseltine prepared? large, conventional forces in Western Europe. The second Lt. Col. George Watkins, 34th Fighter Squadron commander, drops a GBU-12 laser-guided bomb from Base officials an F-35A at the Utah Test and Training Range Feb. 25. The 34th FS is the Air Force’s first combat unit offset came in the 1970s when to employ munitions from the F-35A. offer weather, the Soviet Union achieved active shooter nuclear parity and the U.S. to leverage new technologies autonomous systems and satellite networks, cyber bugs preparedness sought an advantage by turning to offset advances made by human-machine networks. A that infect and take down tips to precision-guided weapons. adversaries in recent years. battlespace of the year 2030 adversaries’ computers and The Third Offset is the It will draw on technologies could see F-35s or a next- Pages 8-9 Department of Defense strategy such as artificial intelligence, generation aircraft linked by See Plan page 5.
  • TAC Tanker Tales Volume 2 ,Issue 4 June 2002 Tactical Tankers Association, Ltd

    TAC Tanker Tales Volume 2 ,Issue 4 June 2002 Tactical Tankers Association, Ltd

    TAC Tanker Tales Volume 2 ,Issue 4 June 2002 Tactical Tankers Association, Ltd. 231 King Street Lancaster, OH 43130 Phone: 740-653-3835 Fax: 740-687-0448 Email:[email protected] Banquet Program Speech by Ruf Mewborn (continued from Page 1) were added and in 1958 we saw the performance greatly improved. The After the tanker squadrons were deactivated we were all scat- jets decreased the ground roll on take off by 30%, making an 8000 foot tered to various assignments and the KB-50 organizations became his- roll on a 9000 foot runway a comfortable 6300 feet. tory. A history that was never recorded. After the discussions with the With their newly acquired tanker fleet TAC began planning to Langley historian and the Air Mobility Command’s historian, it’s obvi- enter the Cold War and cover the brush fires that SAC could not attack ous we never got a good page in the history books. We hope to change with their nuclear force. The Composite Air Strike Force was formed to that and with your help and under the direction of our historian John quickly respond to Communist threats around the perimeter of the Com- Bessette that can be done. munist world. It was very successful and the tanker squadrons with Looking back at the beginning of this history, the TAC Tanker dedicated crews and the KB -50J were the workhouse of the strike force. business was not a pretty picture. In 1953, most of our tactical aircraft In 1958, the strike force was selected to received the Mackay were still in the Far East with the Korean Armistice having been signed Trophy.
  • Laughlin Air Force Base, USA

    Laughlin Air Force Base, USA

    Laughlin Air Force Base, USA Email Article Print Link To Us Related Projects Key Data Type Military Training Base Location Val Verde County, near Del Rio, Texas Built March 1943 Owner US Air Force Operator Air Education and Training Command Controller United States (US) Occupants 47th Flying Training Wing Full specifications Laughlin Air Force Base is a military training base situated 8km east of Del Rio in Texas, US. It is the United States Air Force's biggest pilot training base. The base is owned by the United States Air Force and operated by Air Education and Training Command. History Laughlin Air Force Base was established in March 1943 Expand Image under the designation A technical sergeant Laughlin Army Air Field. monitors air traffic at Built on a 15.2km² site near Laughlin Air Force Base. the border of the US and Mexico, the field was named in the honour of Second World War martyr Jack T Laughlin. It was renamed as Laughlin Field in November 1943 and later became Army Air Force Auxiliary Field, which Expand Image was shut down in October The directorate of the T-6 1945. Services resumed in maintenance division May 1952. examines a T-6 Texan II parked at Laughlin Air The Crew Training Air Force acquired Army Air Force Auxiliary Field in October Force Base. 1952. Pilot training was initially carried out using the F-80 Shooting Star, F-84 Thunderjet and T-33 jet. The F-80 and F-84 were later removed from service. Missions were later shifted to Williams Air Force Base in Arizona.
  • Paul Johnson Led the Rescue Team to a Downed F-14 Pilot Just As Iraqi Forces Were Moving In

    Paul Johnson Led the Rescue Team to a Downed F-14 Pilot Just As Iraqi Forces Were Moving In

    Hog Heaven Paul Johnson led the rescue team to a downed F-14 pilot just as Iraqi forces were moving in. he memoirs of many depth into Iraqi territory, and it ended would goad Israel into attacking Iraq pilots begin with the with the successful rescue of an F-14 through Scud attacks. Such an Israeli at- moving moment when Tomcat pilot who had been shot down tack could have splintered the coalition, they first saw an air- deep behind enemy lines. which included numerous Arab nations, plane and determined That day, Jan. 21, 1991, started out attempting to free Kuwait. Tthey would become a pilot. Not so for in typical fashion. After being kept on a Johnson found the suspected site and Paul T. Johnson, who grew up in the weather hold, Johnson launched on the confirmed it did not harbor Scuds. He rural South with his sights set not on flight from Fahd to Khalid as Sandy 57, refueled again, contacted the AWACS, enemy aircraft—but on becoming a with Capt. Randy Goff as his wingman and was redispatched to the original set successful farmer. in Sandy 58. of coordinates. In 1980, Johnson earned an ag- Much of the equipment in use during riculture degree from Murray State Deep Into Iraq Desert Storm would have been familiar University in Kentucky, launching a An hour into the flight, and just 10 to the earlier generation of pilots who farming career focused primarily on minutes before they were to land at had flown in Vietnam. row crops and cattle. KKMC, they were given a combat search Johnson had to track down the downed The farming vocation proved to and rescue task.
  • Trend Analysis the Israeli Unit 8200 an OSINT-Based Study CSS

    Trend Analysis the Israeli Unit 8200 an OSINT-Based Study CSS

    CSS CYBER DEFENSE PROJECT Trend Analysis The Israeli Unit 8200 An OSINT-based study Zürich, December 2019 Risk and Resilience Team Center for Security Studies (CSS), ETH Zürich Trend analysis: The Israeli Unit 8200 – An OSINT-based study Author: Sean Cordey © 2019 Center for Security Studies (CSS), ETH Zurich Contact: Center for Security Studies Haldeneggsteig 4 ETH Zurich CH-8092 Zurich Switzerland Tel.: +41-44-632 40 25 [email protected] www.css.ethz.ch Analysis prepared by: Center for Security Studies (CSS), ETH Zurich ETH-CSS project management: Tim Prior, Head of the Risk and Resilience Research Group, Myriam Dunn Cavelty, Deputy Head for Research and Teaching; Andreas Wenger, Director of the CSS Disclaimer: The opinions presented in this study exclusively reflect the authors’ views. Please cite as: Cordey, S. (2019). Trend Analysis: The Israeli Unit 8200 – An OSINT-based study. Center for Security Studies (CSS), ETH Zürich. 1 Trend analysis: The Israeli Unit 8200 – An OSINT-based study . Table of Contents 1 Introduction 4 2 Historical Background 5 2.1 Pre-independence intelligence units 5 2.2 Post-independence unit: former capabilities, missions, mandate and techniques 5 2.3 The Yom Kippur War and its consequences 6 3 Operational Background 8 3.1 Unit mandate, activities and capabilities 8 3.2 Attributed and alleged operations 8 3.3 International efforts and cooperation 9 4 Organizational and Cultural Background 10 4.1 Organizational structure 10 Structure and sub-units 10 Infrastructure 11 4.2 Selection and training process 12 Attractiveness and motivation 12 Screening process 12 Selection process 13 Training process 13 Service, reserve and alumni 14 4.3 Internal culture 14 5 Discussion and Analysis 16 5.1 Strengths 16 5.2 Weaknesses 17 6 Conclusion and Recommendations 18 7 Glossary 20 8 Abbreviations 20 9 Bibliography 21 2 Trend analysis: The Israeli Unit 8200 – An OSINT-based study selection tests comprise a psychometric test, rigorous Executive Summary interviews, and an education/skills test.
  • GAO-18-75, Accessible Version, F-35 Aircraft Sustainment

    GAO-18-75, Accessible Version, F-35 Aircraft Sustainment

    United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Committees October 2017 F-35 AIRCRAFT SUSTAINMENT DOD Needs to Address Challenges Affecting Readiness and Cost Transparency Accessible Version GAO-18-75 October 2017 F-35 AIRCRAFT SUSTAINMENT DOD Needs to Address Challenges Affecting Readiness and Cost Transparency Highlights of GAO-18-75, a report to congressional committees Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found The F-35 aircraft represents the future The Department of Defense (DOD) is sustaining over 250 F-35 aircraft (F-35) of tactical aviation for the U.S. military, and plans to triple the fleet by the end of 2021, but is facing sustainment and is DOD’s most expensive weapon challenges that are affecting warfighter readiness (see table). These challenges system, with sustainment costs alone are largely the result of sustainment plans that do not fully include key estimated at more than $1 trillion over requirements or aligned (timely and sufficient) funding. DOD is taking steps to a 60-year life cycle. As the F-35 address some challenges, but without more comprehensive plans and aligned program approaches full-rate funding, DOD risks being unable to fully leverage the F-35’s capabilities and production, DOD is working to deliver sustain a rapidly expanding fleet. an affordable sustainment strategy that is able to meet the needs of the military Table: Key Department of Defense (DOD) Challenges for F-35 Aircraft Sustainment services. This strategy is being tested Key challenge Description as DOD stands up military depots, Limited repair capacity DOD’s capabilities to repair F-35 parts at military depots are 6 years trains personnel, and supports its first at depots behind schedule, which has resulted in average part repair times of 172 operational squadrons—with plans to days—twice the program’s objective (see figure 1).