Cultural Resources Appendix

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cultural Resources Appendix APPENDIX F: Cultural Resources Appendix Volume III – Convey Atchafalaya River Water to Northern Terrebonne Marshes and Multipurpose Operation of the Houma Navigation Lock– Appendix F – Cultural Resources Volume III APPENDIX F: Cultural Resources Assessment of the Potential Effects on Archaeological Resources within the LCA ARNTM Project Area Prepared by U.S. Army Engineer District St. Louis Center of Expertise for Curation and Management of Archaeological Collections (CX-CMAC) F-1 Volume III – Convey Atchafalaya River Water to Northern Terrebonne Marshes and Multipurpose Operation of the Houma Navigation Lock– Appendix F – Cultural Resources Table of Contents 1.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 4 2.1 Consultations............................................................................................................ 7 3.1 Physiographic Setting .............................................................................................. 8 4.1 Geomorphic History................................................................................................. 8 5.1 National Register of Historic Places ...................................................................... 10 6.1 Known Archaeological Surveys ............................................................................ 12 7.1 Project Area Reconnaissance ................................................................................. 13 8.1 Site Population ....................................................................................................... 14 9.1 Site Cultural/Temporal Affiliation ......................................................................... 15 10.1 Site Locations......................................................................................................... 17 11.1 Site Landform Associations as listed on Site Record Forms ................................. 18 12.1 Site Regional Landform Associations ................................................................... 18 13.1 Potential Disturbance from Project Features ......................................................... 25 14.1 Known Sites Endangered by Project Features ....................................................... 27 15.1 Testing Strategies ................................................................................................... 30 16.1 Summary ................................................................................................................ 31 17.1 References Cited .................................................................................................... 32 18.1 Addendum: Gagne Private Cemetery .................................................................... 33 19.1 Background ............................................................................................................ 33 20.1 History of Cemetery Location ............................................................................... 34 21.1 Brief history of the Gagne Brothers ....................................................................... 39 22.1 Summary and Conclusion ...................................................................................... 40 23.1 References Cited .................................................................................................... 42 List of Figures Figure 1. Physiographic sections along the lower Mississippi .......................................... 8 Figure 2. Historic delta sequence (after Weinstein and Gagliano 1985: Fig. 1) ................ 9 Figure 3. Map of proposed project area displaying listed National Register locations ... 11 Figure 4. Map of proposed project area with known archaeological surveys and sites ... 13 Figure 5. Map of routes taken by investigators during project reconnaissance ............... 14 Figure 6. Chart showing chronology of cultural periods and number of sites within project area so designated (in circle) ................................................................................ 17 Figure 7. Major site clusters within project boundary ..................................................... 18 Figure 8. Geologic map of proposed project area with known archaeological sites ....... 20 Figure 9. 1895 map of proposed project area showing known archaeological sites........ 24 Figure 10. Sites within 100 meters of proposed project features ..................................... 28 Addendum Figure 1. Current parcel lots in Houma, LA .................................................................... 33 Figure 2. Original land patents in Terrebonne Parish from 1830 survey......................... 34 Figure 3. Sketch map from Wesley House NRHP nomination ....................................... 36 Figure 4. 1924 Sanborn map of area near cemetery with modern shoreline indicated .... 37 Figure 5. 1940 Sanborn map of area near cemetery with modern shoreline indicated .... 37 F-2 Volume III – Convey Atchafalaya River Water to Northern Terrebonne Marshes and Multipurpose Operation of the Houma Navigation Lock– Appendix F – Cultural Resources Figure 6. Land segments annexed to Houma ................................................................... 38 List of Tables Table 1. NR listed properties within project boundary .................................................... 10 Table 2. NR listed properties within one kilometers of project area ............................... 10 Table 3. Metrics of archaeological surveys within project boundary .............................. 12 Table 4. NRHP status for sites within project boundary ................................................. 15 Table 5. Cultural/temporal affiliation of sites within project boundary .......................... 15 Table 6. Landform listed on State Site Record Forms ..................................................... 18 Table 7. Non-random distribution of sites verses geography of project area .................. 21 Table 8. Non-random distribution of sites verses geography of project area (single marsh category) ........................................................................................................................... 21 Table 9. Non-random distribution of survey tracks vs. geography of project area ......... 22 Table 10. Non-random distribution of sites vs. geography of linear survey area (proxy for bias) ................................................................................................................................... 22 Table 11. Non-random distribution of sites vs. geography of linear survey area (proxy for survey bias) with single marsh category ........................................................................... 22 Table 12. Non-random distribution of sites verses geography of project area from 1895 map .................................................................................................................................... 23 Table 13. Temporary ROW of project features ............................................................... 25 Table 14. Impacted geologic regions of combined project features ................................ 26 Table 15. Archaeological sites within 100 meters of proposed project features ............. 30 F-3 Volume III – Convey Atchafalaya River Water to Northern Terrebonne Marshes and Multipurpose Operation of the Houma Navigation Lock– Appendix F – Cultural Resources 1.1 Introduction In satisfaction of Section 106 of the NHPA, a Programmatic Agreement (PA) between USACE-MVN, SHPO, and ACHP, has been developed to address the needs of LCA projects including Convey Atchafalaya River Water to North Terrebonne Marshes. A copy of the PA appears at the conclusion of this section. Federally recognized tribes, State tribes, local governments and other interested parties have been invited to participate as consulting parties. Copies of notification documents and lists of interested parties follow the Programmatic Agreement at the end of the cultural resources summary. The cultural resources portion of this feasibility study provides a synthesis of previous investigations in the project area that includes the locations and available information for surveys and sites reported, thus facilitating the expeditious planning and implementation of the resulting project. The primary purpose of cultural resources identification is to provide recommendations that will assist project managers, engineers, and other decision- makers in the avoidance of adverse impacts. The current feasibility study is limited to literature and records review and sample survey as set forth in ER 1105-2-100 paragraph 5 (Feasibility Phase Studies). There has been no evaluation and testing, intensive survey/inventory, or mitigation. Discovery of cultural resources and determinations of significance presented in this section are drawn from archaeological survey reports and site recording documents housed at the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Both SHPO and THPO notification was undertaken to prepare concerned parties for future project possibilities (see correspondence section below). Regular meetings with SHPO and the Louisiana State Archaeologist were supplemented by email correspondence in an effort to work in concert with the interests of the State and its citizens. Visits to potentially impacted loci within the project area were undertaken over two days on May 6, 2009 and May 7, 2009. The standard for site significance adheres to the criteria
Recommended publications
  • The Atchafalaya Basin
    7KH$WFKDIDOD\D%DVLQ5LYHURI7UHHV The U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), is monitoring the basin to determine environmental effects of flood-management practices. The Atchafalaya Basin in south-central Louisiana includes the largest contiguous river swamp in the United States and the largest contiguous wetlands in the Mississippi River Valley. The basin includes 10 distinct aquatic and terrestrial habitats ranging from large rivers to backwater swamps. The basin is most noted for its cypress-tupelo gum swamp habitat and its Cajun heritage. Water in the Atchafalaya Basin originates from one or more of the distributaries of the Atchafalaya River. Facts • Located between the cities of Baton Rouge to the east and Lafayette to the west. • More than 1.4 million acres: --885,000 acres of forested wetlands in the Atchafalaya Basin Floodway. --517,000 acres of marshland. • Home to: --9 Federal and State listed endangered/ threatened wildlife species. --More than 170 bird species and impor- tant wintering grounds for birds of the Mississippi Flyway. --6 endangered/threatened bird species and The Atchafalaya Basin offers an opportunity to implement adaptive management practices because of the 29 rookeries. general support of private, local, State, and national organizations and governmental agencies for the State --More than 40 mammalian species. and Federal Master Plans. --More than 40 reptilian and 20 amphibian • Most active-growing delta (land accre- • More than 1,000 pounds of finfish per acre species. tion) in the conterminous United States. in some water bodies in the lower part of --More than 100 finfish and shellfish spe- the basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Atchafalaya National Wildlife Refuge Managed As Part of Sherburne Complex
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Atchafalaya National Wildlife Refuge Managed as part of Sherburne Complex Tom Carlisle This basin contains over one-half million acres of hardwood swamps, lakes and bayous, and is larger than the vast Okefenokee Swamp of Georgia and Florida. It is an immense This blue goose, natural floodplain of the Atchafalaya designed by J.N. River, which flows for 140 miles south “Ding” Darling, from its parting from the Mississippi has become the River to the Gulf of Mexico. symbol of the National Wildlife The fish and wildlife resources Refuge System. of the Atchafalaya River Basin are exceptional. The basin’s dense bottomland hardwoods, cypress- tupelo swamps, overflow lakes, and meandering bayous provide a tremendous diversity of habitat for many species of fish and wildlife. Ecologists rank the basin as one of the most productive wildlife areas in North America. The basin also supports an extremely productive sport and commercial fishery, and provides unique recreational opportunities to hundreds of thousands of Americans each year. Wildlife Every year, thousands of migratory waterfowl winter in the overflow swamps and lakes of the basin, located at the southern end of the great Mississippi Flyway. The lakes of the lower basin support one of the largest wintering concentrations of canvasbacks in Louisiana. The basin’s wooded wetlands also provide vital nesting habitat for wood ducks, and support the nation’s largest concentration of American America’s Great River Swamp woodcock. More than 300 species of Deep in the heart of Cajun Country, resident and migratory birds use the basin, including a large assortment at the southern end of the Lower of diving and wading birds such as egrets, herons, ibises, and anhingas.
    [Show full text]
  • Prehistoric Settlements of Coastal Louisiana. William Grant Mcintire Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1954 Prehistoric Settlements of Coastal Louisiana. William Grant Mcintire Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Mcintire, William Grant, "Prehistoric Settlements of Coastal Louisiana." (1954). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 8099. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/8099 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HjEHisroaic smm&ws in coastal Louisiana A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Geography and Anthropology by William Grant MeIntire B. S., Brigham Young University, 195>G June, X9$k UMI Number: DP69477 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI DP69477 Published by ProQuest LLC (2015). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code ProQuest: ProQuest LLC.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Use Management in the Atchafalaya River Basin: Research at the Confluence of Public Policy and Ecosystem Science
    Southern Illinois University Carbondale OpenSIUC Reports IGERT 2013 Multi-Use Management in the Atchafalaya River Basin: Research at the Confluence of Public Policy and Ecosystem Science Micah Bennett Southern Illinois University Carbondale Kelley Fritz Southern Illinois University Carbondale Anne Hayden-Lesmeister Southern Illinois University Carbondale Justin Kozak Southern Illinois University Carbondale Aaron Nickolotsky Southern Illinois University Carbondale Follow this and additional works at: http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/igert_reports A report in fulfillment of the NSF IGERT Program requirements. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0903510. Recommended Citation Bennett, Micah; Fritz, Kelley; Hayden-Lesmeister, Anne; Kozak, Justin; and Nickolotsky, Aaron, "Multi-Use Management in the Atchafalaya River Basin: Research at the Confluence of Public Policy and Ecosystem Science" (2013). Reports. Paper 2. http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/igert_reports/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the IGERT at OpenSIUC. It has been accepted for inclusion in Reports by an authorized administrator of OpenSIUC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MULTI-USE MANAGEMENT IN THE ATCHAFALAYA RIVER BASIN: RESEARCH AT THE CONFLUENCE OF PUBLIC POLICY AND ECOSYSTEM SCIENCE BY MICAH BENNETT, KELLEY FRITZ, ANNE HAYDEN-LESMEISTER, JUSTIN KOZAK, AND AARON NICKOLOTSKY SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY CARBONDALE NSF IGERT PROGRAM IN WATERSHED SCIENCE AND POLICY A report
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of the Mississippi River & Tributaries (Mr&T)
    1 OVERVIEW OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER & TRIBUTARIES (MR&T) - ATCHAFALAYA BASIN PROJECT 237 217 200 80 252 237 217 200 119 174 237 217 200 27 .59 255 0 163 131 239 110 112 62 102 130 Port255 Of0 Morgan163 City132 –65 Stakeholder135 92 Meeting102 56 120 255 0 163 122 53 120 56 130 48 111 Durund Elzey Assistance Deputy District Engineer (ADPM) US Army Corps of Engineers New Orleans District 11 February 2019 2 TOPICS OF DISCUSSION • Passing the MR&T Project Design Flood • The Jadwin Plan • The Morganza Floodway • The Old River Control Complex • MR&T Atchafalaya Basin Flood Control Project • Atchafalaya Basin Levee Construction • Atchafalaya Basin O&M • Atchafalaya River Dredging • The Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System (ABFS) Project • Sedimentation Issues • Path Forward 3 THE FLOOD OF 1927 Flood Control Act of 1928 4 and the Jadwin Plan The Morganza Floodway 5 6 Old River Control Structures Authorized 1973 Flood . The Low Sill Control Structure was undermined and the Wing Wall failed . The Old River Overbank Control Structure and the Morganza Control Structure were opened to relieve stress on the Low Sill Control Structure . Due to severe damage to the Low Sill Control Structure, USACE recommended construction of the Auxiliary Control Structure, which was completed in 1986 Morganza Control Structure Operated for First Time View of Old River Control Complex Old River Lock Auxiliary Control Structure Low Sill Control Structure Overbank Control Structure S.A. Murray Hydro 9 The Flood of 2011 10 Extent of 1927 Flood (in Blue) Versus 2011 Flood (in Green) Passing the Project Design Flood 11 The MR&T Atchafalaya Basin Project The MR&T Atchafalaya Basin Project Major Components • 451 Miles of Levees and Floodwalls • 4 Navigation Locks .
    [Show full text]
  • H. Doc. 108-222
    EIGHTEENTH CONGRESS MARCH 4, 1823, TO MARCH 3, 1825 FIRST SESSION—December 1, 1823, to May 27, 1824 SECOND SESSION—December 6, 1824, to March 3, 1825 VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES—DANIEL D. TOMPKINS, of New York PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE OF THE SENATE—JOHN GAILLARD, 1 of South Carolina SECRETARY OF THE SENATE—CHARLES CUTTS, of New Hampshire SERGEANT AT ARMS OF THE SENATE—MOUNTJOY BAYLY, of Maryland SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES—HENRY CLAY, 2 of Kentucky CLERK OF THE HOUSE—MATTHEW ST. CLAIR CLARKE, 3 of Pennsylvania SERGEANT AT ARMS OF THE HOUSE—THOMAS DUNN, of Maryland; JOHN O. DUNN, 4 of District of Columbia DOORKEEPER OF THE HOUSE—BENJAMIN BIRCH, of Maryland ALABAMA GEORGIA Waller Taylor, Vincennes SENATORS SENATORS REPRESENTATIVES William R. King, Cahaba John Elliott, Sunbury Jonathan Jennings, Charlestown William Kelly, Huntsville Nicholas Ware, 8 Richmond John Test, Brookville REPRESENTATIVES Thomas W. Cobb, 9 Greensboro William Prince, 14 Princeton John McKee, Tuscaloosa REPRESENTATIVES AT LARGE Gabriel Moore, Huntsville Jacob Call, 15 Princeton George W. Owen, Claiborne Joel Abbot, Washington George Cary, Appling CONNECTICUT Thomas W. Cobb, 10 Greensboro KENTUCKY 11 SENATORS Richard H. Wilde, Augusta SENATORS James Lanman, Norwich Alfred Cuthbert, Eatonton Elijah Boardman, 5 Litchfield John Forsyth, Augusta Richard M. Johnson, Great Crossings Henry W. Edwards, 6 New Haven Edward F. Tattnall, Savannah Isham Talbot, Frankfort REPRESENTATIVES AT LARGE Wiley Thompson, Elberton REPRESENTATIVES Noyes Barber, Groton Samuel A. Foote, Cheshire ILLINOIS Richard A. Buckner, Greensburg Ansel Sterling, Sharon SENATORS Henry Clay, Lexington Ebenezer Stoddard, Woodstock Jesse B. Thomas, Edwardsville Robert P. Henry, Hopkinsville Gideon Tomlinson, Fairfield Ninian Edwards, 12 Edwardsville Francis Johnson, Bowling Green Lemuel Whitman, Farmington John McLean, 13 Shawneetown John T.
    [Show full text]
  • Obituary Record
    S U TO THE OBITUARY RECORD TO GRADUATES OF YALE UNIVEESITY. 1909—10. YALE COLLEGE. (ACADEMICAL DEPARTMENT) 1832 JOHN H \MPDFN LEWIS, son of Joshua and America (Lawson) Lewis, was born on September 14, 1810, m New Orleans, La, and was a resident of that city during his life In 1796 his father moved from Virginia to Kentucky, studied and practiced law there, and when the purchase of Louisiana was effected was sent by President Jefferson, with Edward Livingston and James Brown, as a commisMoner to receive the territory from the French authorities He was Territorial Judge of the Territory of New Orleans, and after the admission of the State of Louisiana into the Union was Judge of the First Judicial District until his death in 1833 In Sophomore year the son was involved in the "Conic Sections Rebellion" of 1830, and with many of his classmates left college, but he received the degree of Master of Arts and was enrolled with his class in 1880 In accordance with the desire of his father he began the study of medicine, first taking a winter course at Cincinnati, and con- tinuing his studies in the Charity Hospital in New Orleans, of which he became Assistant Surgeon In 1832 he went to Pans, and after eighteen months of study abroad returned and grad- YALE COLLEGE 1339 uated in 1836 with the first class from the Louisiana Medical College After having charge of a private infirmary for a time he again went abroad for further study In order to obtain the nec- essary diploma in arts and sciences he first studied in the Sorbonne after which he entered
    [Show full text]
  • Atchafalya Basin, Shortcut to the Gulf
    a release valve, carrying large amounts of about 51,000 people. As a major center Geography fl oodwaters to the Gulf. of coastal fi shing and oil fi eld industries, Because the Atchafalaya is a natural dis- Morgan City is located about 15 miles up- In The tributary of the Mississippi, there has long stream from the mouth of the Atchafalaya. been a concern that during a major fl ood Most of the basin, however, is sparsely News™ the Mississippi’s fl ow might overpower populated with the rural population living the fl ood structures and be diverted per- along the numerous levees, representing manently into the Atchafalaya. Such an the highest ground. uncontrolled diversion could leave the Flooding remains a problem in the Neal G. city of New Orleans high and dry. Conse- Atchafalaya Basin, as little of the land is Lineback quently, the Corps of Engineers has gone more than a few feet (1m) above the nor- to great lengths to make certain that does mal levels of the river, bayous, lakes and not happen. swamps. When heavy precipitation events ATCHAFALYA The Atchafalaya River’s course mean- occur over the basin or upstream on the ders as it fl ows slowly southward across Mississippi or Red rivers, the Atchafalaya BASIN, the Atchafalaya Basin, which represents River can rise, spreading the fl oodwaters one of the largest U.S. wetlands. This across the adjacent areas and acting as a SHORTCUT TO plain-like basin is covered with bayous, fl oodwater containment area. swamps and marshes. The bayous are The basin’s marsh lands also help brunt THE GULF small streams that have broken away from any storm surge that may occur along the Massive fl ooding in the lower Missis- or parallel the main stream and merge Gulf Coast, reducing property damage.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019-2020 Missouri Roster
    The Missouri Roster 2019–2020 Secretary of State John R. Ashcroft State Capitol Room 208 Jefferson City, MO 65101 www.sos.mo.gov John R. Ashcroft Secretary of State Cover image: A sunrise appears on the horizon over the Missouri River in Jefferson City. Photo courtesy of Tyler Beck Photography www.tylerbeck.photography The Missouri Roster 2019–2020 A directory of state, district, county and federal officials John R. Ashcroft Secretary of State Office of the Secretary of State State of Missouri Jefferson City 65101 STATE CAPITOL John R. Ashcroft ROOM 208 SECRETARY OF STATE (573) 751-2379 Dear Fellow Missourians, As your secretary of state, it is my honor to provide this year’s Mis- souri Roster as a way for you to access Missouri’s elected officials at the county, state and federal levels. This publication provides contact information for officials through- out the state and includes information about personnel within exec- utive branch departments, the General Assembly and the judiciary. Additionally, you will find the most recent municipal classifications and results of the 2018 general election. The strength of our great state depends on open communication and honest, civil debate; we have been given an incredible oppor- tunity to model this for the next generation. I encourage you to par- ticipate in your government, contact your elected representatives and make your voice heard. Sincerely, John R. Ashcroft Secretary of State www.sos.mo.gov The content of the Missouri Roster is public information, and may be used accordingly; however, the arrangement, graphics and maps are copyrighted material.
    [Show full text]
  • RG 68 Master Calendar
    RG 68 MASTER CALENDAR Louisiana State Museum Historical Center Archives May 2012 Date Description 1387, 1517, 1525 Legal document in French, Xerox copy (1966.011.1-.3) 1584, October 20 Letter, from Henry IV, King of France, to Francois de Roaldes (07454) 1640, August 12 1682 copy of a 1640 Marriage contract between Louis Le Brect and Antoinette Lefebre (2010.019.00001.1-.2) 1648, January 23 Act of sale between Mayre Grignonneau Piqueret and Charles le Boeteux (2010.019.00002.1-.2) 1680, February 21 Photostat, Baptismal certificate of Jean Baptoste, son of Charles le Moyne and marriage contract of Charles le Moyne and Catherine Primot (2010.019.00003 a-b) 1694 Reprint (engraving), frontspiece, an Almanack by John Tulley (2010.019.00004) c. 1700-1705 Diary of Louisiana in French (2010.019.00005 a-b) c. 1700 Letter in French from Philadelphia, bad condition (2010.019.00006) 1711, October 18 Document, Spanish, bound, typescript, hand-illustrated manuscript of the bestowing of a title of nobility by Charles II of Spain, motto on Coat of Arms of King of Spain, Philippe V, Corella (09390.1) 1711, October 18 Typescript copy of royal ordinance, bestows the title of Marquis deVillaherman deAlfrado on Dr. Don Geronina deSoria Velazquez, his heirs and successors as decreed by King Phillip 5th, Spain (19390.2) 1714, January 15 English translation of a letter written at Pensacola by M. Le Maitre, a missionary in the country (2010.019.00007.1-.29) 1714 Document, translated into Spanish from French, regarding the genealogy of the John Douglas de Schott family (2010.019.00008 a-b) 1719, December 29 Document, handwritten copy, Concession of St.
    [Show full text]
  • Craft Horizons JULY/AUGUST 1968 a SHOPPING CENTER Ahme for JEWELRY CRAFTSMEN at Your Fingertips! KILNS & CERAMIC EQUIPMENT GAS KILNS from 2 Cu
    craft horizons JULY/AUGUST 1968 A SHOPPING CENTER Ahme FOR JEWELRY CRAFTSMEN at your fingertips! KILNS & CERAMIC EQUIPMENT GAS KILNS from 2 cu. ft. to 60 cu. ft. All fire to 2500°F — some to 3000°F. Instrumentation for temperature control and a positive control of atmosphere from highly oxidizing to reducing. ELECTRIC KILNS from 2 cu. ft. to 24 cu. ft. Front loading or top loading — all models fire to 2350°F — some to 2800' F. Fully instrumented. complete catalog of... TOOLS AND SUPPLIES We've spent one year working, compiling and publishing our new 244-page Catalog 1065 ... now it is available. We're mighty proud of this new one. .. because we've incor- porated brand new never-before sections on casting equipment, electroplating equipment and precious metals... We spent literally months redesigning the metals section . giving it clarity ... yet making it concise and with lots of information ... Your 244-page catalog is waiting for you ... just send us $1.00 ... and we'll send you the largest and most complete catalog A wide selection of in the industry. With it you'll receive a certificate ... and POTTERY WHEEL when you send it in with your first order of $5.00 or more... models are available we'll deduct the $1.00 from the order. Order your catalog today . we're certain you'll find it the best "wish-book" you ever had . besides it is destined to become THE encyclopedia of tools and supplies for crafts and jewelry people. Ij| CH WRITE TODAY for COMPLETE information Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Record Group 1 Judicial Records of the French
    RECORD GROUP 1 JUDICIAL RECORDS OF THE FRENCH SUPERIOR COUNCIL Acc. #'s 1848, 1867 1714-1769, n.d. 108 ln. ft (216 boxes); 8 oversize boxes These criminal and civil records, which comprise the heart of the museum’s manuscript collection, are an invaluable source for researching Louisiana’s colonial history. They record the social, political and economic lives of rich and poor, female and male, slave and free, African, Native, European and American colonials. Although the majority of the cases deal with attempts by creditors to recover unpaid debts, the colonial collection includes many successions. These documents often contain a wealth of biographical information concerning Louisiana’s colonial inhabitants. Estate inventories, records of commercial transactions, correspondence and copies of wills, marriage contracts and baptismal, marriage and burial records may be included in a succession document. The colonial document collection includes petitions by slaves requesting manumission, applications by merchants for licenses to conduct business, requests by ship captains for absolution from responsibility for cargo lost at sea, and requests by traders for permission to conduct business in Europe, the West Indies and British colonies in North America **************************************************************************** RECORD GROUP 2 SPANISH JUDICIAL RECORDS Acc. # 1849.1; 1867; 7243 Acc. # 1849.2 = playing cards, 17790402202 Acc. # 1849.3 = 1799060301 1769-1803 190.5 ln. ft (381 boxes); 2 oversize boxes Like the judicial records from the French period, but with more details given, the Spanish records show the life of all of the colony. In addition, during the Spanish period many slaves of Indian 1 ancestry petitioned government authorities for their freedom.
    [Show full text]