Multi-Use Management in the Atchafalaya River Basin: Research at the Confluence of Public Policy and Ecosystem Science

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Multi-Use Management in the Atchafalaya River Basin: Research at the Confluence of Public Policy and Ecosystem Science Southern Illinois University Carbondale OpenSIUC Reports IGERT 2013 Multi-Use Management in the Atchafalaya River Basin: Research at the Confluence of Public Policy and Ecosystem Science Micah Bennett Southern Illinois University Carbondale Kelley Fritz Southern Illinois University Carbondale Anne Hayden-Lesmeister Southern Illinois University Carbondale Justin Kozak Southern Illinois University Carbondale Aaron Nickolotsky Southern Illinois University Carbondale Follow this and additional works at: http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/igert_reports A report in fulfillment of the NSF IGERT Program requirements. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0903510. Recommended Citation Bennett, Micah; Fritz, Kelley; Hayden-Lesmeister, Anne; Kozak, Justin; and Nickolotsky, Aaron, "Multi-Use Management in the Atchafalaya River Basin: Research at the Confluence of Public Policy and Ecosystem Science" (2013). Reports. Paper 2. http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/igert_reports/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the IGERT at OpenSIUC. It has been accepted for inclusion in Reports by an authorized administrator of OpenSIUC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MULTI-USE MANAGEMENT IN THE ATCHAFALAYA RIVER BASIN: RESEARCH AT THE CONFLUENCE OF PUBLIC POLICY AND ECOSYSTEM SCIENCE BY MICAH BENNETT, KELLEY FRITZ, ANNE HAYDEN-LESMEISTER, JUSTIN KOZAK, AND AARON NICKOLOTSKY SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY CARBONDALE NSF IGERT PROGRAM IN WATERSHED SCIENCE AND POLICY A report in fulfillment of the NSF IGERT Program requirements MULTI-USE MANAGEMENT IN THE ATCHAFALAYA RIVER BASIN: RESEARCH AT THE CONFLUENCE OF PUBLIC POLICY AND ECOSYSTEM SCIENCE BY MICAH BENNETT1,a, KELLEY FRITZ2,a, ANNE HAYDEN-LESMEISTER3,b, JUSTIN KOZAK4,b, AND AARON NICKOLOTSKY5,b SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY CARBONDALE NSF IGERT PROGRAM IN WATERSHED SCIENCE AND POLICY 2013 1 [email protected] 2 [email protected] 3 [email protected] 4 [email protected] a Department of Zoology & Center for Ecology 5 [email protected] b Environmental Resources & Policy Program i Acknowledgments We thank the IGERT PIs (Drs. S. Baer, L. Chevalier, C. Lant, N. Pinter, and M. Whiles) for funding and support, particularly Dr. Chris Lant and Dr. Lizette Chevalier for their direct supervision. Dr. Lant provided helpful critiques of this report at all stages of its development. Dr. Baer and Dr. Whiles gave helpful comments and discussions on the ecosystem services portion of the report (Chapter 5) that were much appreciated. We thank our internship mentors (Dr. Paul Kemp formerly at Audubon Society, Louisiana; Dr. Beth Middleton at USGS, Lafayette, LA; Dr. Bryan Piazza, Dr. Jim Bergan and David Harlan at The Nature Conservancy, Baton Rouge, LA) for their support; particularly to Dr. Middleton and Dr. Piazza for reviewing the full report. Our work would not have been possible without the guidance that these many individuals provided. Finally, we appreciate the assistance of many agencies and organizations working in the ARB for their responses to our questions and requests for information, especially the Atchafalaya Basin Program. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0903510. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Acronyms ..................................................................................................................vii Chapter 1. Introduction.......................................................................................................1 Chapter 2. A History of the Atchafalaya River Basin .....................................................9 2.1. Early Settlement and Development ....................................................................13 2.1.1. Old River Control Structure .................................................................15 2.2. Physical Features ................................................................................................26 2.2.1. Physiographic Region, Land Use and Topography .............................26 2.2.2. Geology ................................................................................................31 2.2.3. Soils......................................................................................................36 2.2.4. Hydrology and Sediment .....................................................................38 2.2.4.1. Hydrology .............................................................................38 2.2.4.2. Sediment ...............................................................................42 2.3. Water Quality and Nutrients ...............................................................................50 2.3.1. Pollution Sources .................................................................................50 2.3.2. Hypoxia ................................................................................................51 2.3.3. Transformation and Export of Nutrients and Pollution .......................52 2.3.3.1. Nitrogen ................................................................................52 2.3.3.2. Phosphorus ............................................................................59 2.3.3.3. Carbon ...................................................................................61 2.4. Biota ....................................................................................................................64 2.4.1. Vegetation and Forests .........................................................................64 2.4.2. Macroinvertebrates ..............................................................................70 2.4.3. Fishes ...................................................................................................79 iii 2.4.4. Amphibians and Reptiles .....................................................................85 2.4.5. Birds .....................................................................................................89 2.4.6. Mammals..............................................................................................93 2.4.7. Invasive Species ...................................................................................96 2.4.7.1. Invasive plants ......................................................................96 2.4.7.2. Invasive invertebrates ...........................................................99 2.4.7.3. Invasive fishes .......................................................................100 2.4.7.4. Invasive mammals ................................................................102 2.5. Summary .............................................................................................................104 Chapter 3: Socioeconomics and Governance of the Atchafalaya River Basin ...............127 3.1. Demographics .....................................................................................................127 3.2. Socioeconomics ..................................................................................................131 3.2.1. Flood Control .......................................................................................132 3.2.2. Navigation ............................................................................................135 3.2.3. Oil and Gas ..........................................................................................136 3.2.4. Agriculture ...........................................................................................137 3.2.5. Timber ..................................................................................................138 3.2.6. Fisheries ...............................................................................................139 3.2.7. Oysters .................................................................................................140 3.2.8. Recreation and Tourism .......................................................................142 3.3. Stakeholders ........................................................................................................145 3.4. Governance .........................................................................................................147 3.4.1. USACE ABFS Master Plan .................................................................153 3.4.2. Louisiana ABFS Master Plan...............................................................157 iv Chapter 4: The Evolving Management of the Atchafalaya River Basin: Sources of Conflict and Suggestions for Resolution ...........................................................................................176 4.1. Introduction .........................................................................................................176 4.2. Study Area and Management Framework ..........................................................178 4.3. Conflict and its Sources ......................................................................................182 4.3.1. Cocodrie Swamp ..................................................................................183 4.3.2. Discussion ............................................................................................188 4.4. A Technical Approach to Improved Stakeholder Collaboration in the ARB .....192 4.4.1. TNC GIS Suitability Analysis for Landowner Outreach .....................193
Recommended publications
  • THE ECOLOGY of BOTTOMLAND HARDWOOD SWAMPS of the SOUTHEAST: a Community Profile
    Biological Services Program FWS/OBS-81 /37 March 1982 THE ECOLOGY OF BOTTOMLAND HARDWOOD SWAMPS OF THE SOUTHEAST: A Community Profile I 49.89 ~~:137 Fish and Wildlife Service 2 c. U.S. Department of the Interior The Biological Services Program was established within the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to supply scientific information and methodologies on key environmental issues that impact fish and wildlife resources and their supporting ecosystems. The mission of the program is as follows: • To strengthen the Fish and Wildlife Service in its role as a primary source of information on national fish and wild­ life resources, particularly in respect to environmental impact assessment. • To gather, analyze, and present information that will aid decisionmakers in the identification and resolution of problems associated with major changes in land and water use. • To provide better ecological information and evaluation for Department of the Interior development programs, such as those relating to energy development. Information developed by the Biological Services Program is intended for use in the planning and decisionmaking process to prevent or minimize the impact of development on fish and wildlife. Research activities and technical assistance services are based on an analysis of the issues, a determination of the decisionmakers involved and their information needs, and an evaluation of the state of the art to identify information gaps and to determine priorities. This is a strategy that will ensure that the products produced and disseminated are timely and useful. Projects have been initiated in the following areas: coal extraction and conversion; power plants; geothermal, mineral and oil shale develop­ ment; water resource analysis, including stream alterations and western water allocation; coastal ecosystems and Outer Continental Shelf develop­ ment; and systems inventory, including National Wetland Inventory, habitat classification and analysis, and information transfer.
    [Show full text]
  • The Atchafalaya Basin
    7KH$WFKDIDOD\D%DVLQ5LYHURI7UHHV The U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), is monitoring the basin to determine environmental effects of flood-management practices. The Atchafalaya Basin in south-central Louisiana includes the largest contiguous river swamp in the United States and the largest contiguous wetlands in the Mississippi River Valley. The basin includes 10 distinct aquatic and terrestrial habitats ranging from large rivers to backwater swamps. The basin is most noted for its cypress-tupelo gum swamp habitat and its Cajun heritage. Water in the Atchafalaya Basin originates from one or more of the distributaries of the Atchafalaya River. Facts • Located between the cities of Baton Rouge to the east and Lafayette to the west. • More than 1.4 million acres: --885,000 acres of forested wetlands in the Atchafalaya Basin Floodway. --517,000 acres of marshland. • Home to: --9 Federal and State listed endangered/ threatened wildlife species. --More than 170 bird species and impor- tant wintering grounds for birds of the Mississippi Flyway. --6 endangered/threatened bird species and The Atchafalaya Basin offers an opportunity to implement adaptive management practices because of the 29 rookeries. general support of private, local, State, and national organizations and governmental agencies for the State --More than 40 mammalian species. and Federal Master Plans. --More than 40 reptilian and 20 amphibian • Most active-growing delta (land accre- • More than 1,000 pounds of finfish per acre species. tion) in the conterminous United States. in some water bodies in the lower part of --More than 100 finfish and shellfish spe- the basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Atchafalaya National Wildlife Refuge Managed As Part of Sherburne Complex
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Atchafalaya National Wildlife Refuge Managed as part of Sherburne Complex Tom Carlisle This basin contains over one-half million acres of hardwood swamps, lakes and bayous, and is larger than the vast Okefenokee Swamp of Georgia and Florida. It is an immense This blue goose, natural floodplain of the Atchafalaya designed by J.N. River, which flows for 140 miles south “Ding” Darling, from its parting from the Mississippi has become the River to the Gulf of Mexico. symbol of the National Wildlife The fish and wildlife resources Refuge System. of the Atchafalaya River Basin are exceptional. The basin’s dense bottomland hardwoods, cypress- tupelo swamps, overflow lakes, and meandering bayous provide a tremendous diversity of habitat for many species of fish and wildlife. Ecologists rank the basin as one of the most productive wildlife areas in North America. The basin also supports an extremely productive sport and commercial fishery, and provides unique recreational opportunities to hundreds of thousands of Americans each year. Wildlife Every year, thousands of migratory waterfowl winter in the overflow swamps and lakes of the basin, located at the southern end of the great Mississippi Flyway. The lakes of the lower basin support one of the largest wintering concentrations of canvasbacks in Louisiana. The basin’s wooded wetlands also provide vital nesting habitat for wood ducks, and support the nation’s largest concentration of American America’s Great River Swamp woodcock. More than 300 species of Deep in the heart of Cajun Country, resident and migratory birds use the basin, including a large assortment at the southern end of the Lower of diving and wading birds such as egrets, herons, ibises, and anhingas.
    [Show full text]
  • Atchafalaya Basin Management Coastal Wetlands Loss And
    and coal geochemistry of Gulf Coast scale topographic maps (1 inch on the the elevation and shape of terrain. The coal-bearing intervals to better under- map represents 2,000 feet on the ground) maps are useful for civil engineering, stand the region’s resources. Planned for Louisiana. The maps depict land- land-use planning, resource monitoring, results of the study include geologic scape features such as lakes and streams, hiking, camping, exploring, and fishing and stratigraphic interpretations char- highways and railroads, boundaries, and expeditions. The map revisions for 1999 acterizing the coal and digital, geo- geographic names. Contour lines depict are shown in figure 6. As the Nation’s largest earth-science and ARK. graphical-referenced data bases that civilian mapping agency, the U.S. Geologi- will include stratigraphic and geochem- cal Survey (USGS) works in cooperation 92 30 Atchafalaya B. Boeuf LOUISIANA ical information. with many Federal, State, and local orga- Basin nizations to provide reliable and impartial 92 00 Baton Mapping Partnerships scientific information to resource manag- MISS. Rouge TEX. ers, planners, and others throughout the RAPIDES The USGS, in partnership with the country. This information is gathered in 31 00 AVOYELLES every state by USGS scientists to minimize Cocodrie Louisiana Office of the Oil Spill Coor- Lake GULF OF MEXICO the loss of life and property from natural dinator, several Federal agencies, and a EVANGELINE 91 30 disasters, contribute to the conservation private aerial mapping company, has B. and sound management of the Nation’s Grosse completed about 95 percent coverage ST. LANDRY POINTE natural resources, and enhance the quality COUPEE of color infrared aerial photography of of life by monitoring water, biological, Tete 30 30 ATCHAFALAYA WEST the State, as part of the National Aerial energy, and mineral resources.
    [Show full text]
  • School of Renewable Natural Resources Newsletter, Fall 2006 Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons Research Matters & RNR Newsletters School of Renewable Natural Resources 2006 School of Renewable Natural Resources Newsletter, Fall 2006 Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/research_matters Recommended Citation Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College, "School of Renewable Natural Resources Newsletter, Fall 2006" (2006). Research Matters & RNR Newsletters. 10. http://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/research_matters/10 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Renewable Natural Resources at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Research Matters & RNR Newsletters by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Fall 2006 Managing resources and protecting the environment . making a difference in the 21st century Migrating With the Ducks School of Renewable Natural Resources 1 I have explained why the focus on the breeding grounds, In the Spotlight so what is it that I am doing? First, I should point out that like most faculty, I do most of my research with the help of graduate students – well over 30 have completed degrees Migrating under my guidance. Most of that research focused on testing With the Ducks management that attempts to enhance nest success – which Frank Rohwer is the key determinant of duck production. Most attempts to George Barineau Jr. Professor of Wildlife Ecology increase duck nest success use passive measures to reduce egg predation – for example, one approach to keeping predators ON THE COVER: Frank and his labrador, Dakota, after an afternoon of checking hatched nests.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Florida Thesis Or Dissertation Formatting
    CHANNEL BED CHANGES IN THE LOWER ATCHAFALAYA RIVER AND WAX LAKE OUTLET, LOUISIANA, 1967-2006 By JEREMY REYNOLDS A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2019 © 2019 Jeremy Reynolds To my parents, my brothers, and all of my friends who have helped support me. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank the members of my committee, Dr. Joann Mossa, Dr. Peter Waylen, and Dr. Liang Mao, for their support and encouragement. I would like to specifically thank Dr. Joann Mossa for her guidance and advice that kept me well on track during this complex process. I would like to thank my peers, specifically Mohammad Abdulrahman and Chia-Yu Wu, for their support and advice on how to tackle this study. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ........................................................................................................... 4 LIST OF TABLES ...................................................................................................................... 6 LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................... 7 ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................... 8 CHAPTER 1 LOWER ATCHAFALAYA CHANNEL BED CHANGE .................................................... 9 Background .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Prehistoric Settlements of Coastal Louisiana. William Grant Mcintire Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1954 Prehistoric Settlements of Coastal Louisiana. William Grant Mcintire Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Mcintire, William Grant, "Prehistoric Settlements of Coastal Louisiana." (1954). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 8099. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/8099 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HjEHisroaic smm&ws in coastal Louisiana A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Geography and Anthropology by William Grant MeIntire B. S., Brigham Young University, 195>G June, X9$k UMI Number: DP69477 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI DP69477 Published by ProQuest LLC (2015). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code ProQuest: ProQuest LLC.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Louisiana Recreational Fishing Regulations
    2021 LOUISIANA RECREATIONAL FISHING REGULATIONS www.wlf.louisiana.gov 1 Get a GEICO quote for your boat and, in just 15 minutes, you’ll know how much you could be saving. If you like what you hear, you can buy your policy right on the spot. Then let us do the rest while you enjoy your free time with peace of mind. geico.com/boat | 1-800-865-4846 Some discounts, coverages, payment plans, and features are not available in all states, in all GEICO companies, or in all situations. Boat and PWC coverages are underwritten by GEICO Marine Insurance Company. In the state of CA, program provided through Boat Association Insurance Services, license #0H87086. GEICO is a registered service mark of Government Employees Insurance Company, Washington, DC 20076; a Berkshire Hathaway Inc. subsidiary. © 2020 GEICO CONTENTS 6. LICENSING 9. DEFINITIONS DON’T 11. GENERAL FISHING INFORMATION General Regulations.............................................11 Saltwater/Freshwater Line...................................12 LITTER 13. FRESHWATER FISHING SPORTSMEN ARE REMINDED TO: General Information.............................................13 • Clean out truck beds and refrain from throwing Freshwater State Creel & Size Limits....................16 cigarette butts or other trash out of the car or watercraft. 18. SALTWATER FISHING • Carry a trash bag in your car or boat. General Information.............................................18 • Securely cover trash containers to prevent Saltwater State Creel & Size Limits.......................21 animals from spreading litter. 26. OTHER RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES Call the state’s “Litterbug Hotline” to report any Recreational Shrimping........................................26 potential littering violations including dumpsites Recreational Oystering.........................................27 and littering in public. Those convicted of littering Recreational Crabbing..........................................28 Recreational Crawfishing......................................29 face hefty fines and litter abatement work.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of the Mississippi River & Tributaries (Mr&T)
    1 OVERVIEW OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER & TRIBUTARIES (MR&T) - ATCHAFALAYA BASIN PROJECT 237 217 200 80 252 237 217 200 119 174 237 217 200 27 .59 255 0 163 131 239 110 112 62 102 130 Port255 Of0 Morgan163 City132 –65 Stakeholder135 92 Meeting102 56 120 255 0 163 122 53 120 56 130 48 111 Durund Elzey Assistance Deputy District Engineer (ADPM) US Army Corps of Engineers New Orleans District 11 February 2019 2 TOPICS OF DISCUSSION • Passing the MR&T Project Design Flood • The Jadwin Plan • The Morganza Floodway • The Old River Control Complex • MR&T Atchafalaya Basin Flood Control Project • Atchafalaya Basin Levee Construction • Atchafalaya Basin O&M • Atchafalaya River Dredging • The Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System (ABFS) Project • Sedimentation Issues • Path Forward 3 THE FLOOD OF 1927 Flood Control Act of 1928 4 and the Jadwin Plan The Morganza Floodway 5 6 Old River Control Structures Authorized 1973 Flood . The Low Sill Control Structure was undermined and the Wing Wall failed . The Old River Overbank Control Structure and the Morganza Control Structure were opened to relieve stress on the Low Sill Control Structure . Due to severe damage to the Low Sill Control Structure, USACE recommended construction of the Auxiliary Control Structure, which was completed in 1986 Morganza Control Structure Operated for First Time View of Old River Control Complex Old River Lock Auxiliary Control Structure Low Sill Control Structure Overbank Control Structure S.A. Murray Hydro 9 The Flood of 2011 10 Extent of 1927 Flood (in Blue) Versus 2011 Flood (in Green) Passing the Project Design Flood 11 The MR&T Atchafalaya Basin Project The MR&T Atchafalaya Basin Project Major Components • 451 Miles of Levees and Floodwalls • 4 Navigation Locks .
    [Show full text]
  • Bayou Têche Paddle Trail Planning 2012-2017
    BAYOU TECHE PADDLE TRAIL La Trace Pagaie de Bayou Teche Bayou Têche Paddle Trail Planning 2012-2017 Prepared by National Park Service Center for Cultural and Eco-Tourism, UL Lafayette Teche Ecology, Culture and History Education Project September 2012 CONTENTS Planning Organization ...............................................................................................................................................4 2010-2012 Participating Agencies and Organizations ...................................................................................4 2010-2012 Bayou Têche Paddle Trail Steering Committee .............................................................................4 Bayou Têche Paddle Trail Mission Statement .................................................................................................4 Planning Goals .............................................................................................................................................4 Planning Objectives......................................................................................................................................4 The Bayou Têche .......................................................................................................................................................5 Location .......................................................................................................................................................5 Atchafalaya National Heritage Area ..............................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • SWAMP WARS: the FIGHT for the ATCHAFALAYA BASIN Annual
    SWAMP WARS: THE FIGHT FOR THE ATCHAFALAYA BASIN Annual Report 2016-2017 A Word from Your Atchafalaya In Memoriam Basinkeeper ~Judith Zoble Gardner~ A huge welcome to our new Staff Attorney, Misha Mitchell, and new It is very hard for me to write about Judith, the wound that her Development Director, Katherine Barney. We are all very lucky to have loss left in my heart is too fresh, the thought of her passing so hard two such talented and bright new people in our movement to save our to bear. No one loved the Atchafalaya Basin more than Judith, and Basin. Their wits and talents will be put to the test as we continue working for reasons that are still a mystery to me, very few people other than to protect the Basin against all odds. my own family knew me as well as Judith did. She loved the Basin The last twelve months had been very hard for Baton Rouge, Lafayette, and many towns around the Atchafalaya Basin. Massive historic flooding and she fought valiantly to protect it. For many years, Cara and Judith has directly or indirectly affected most of our members in our region. This were like two sisters fighting together to keep ABK afloat. For many catastrophic weather event reminds us of how important is to protect the years, every single thank you letter or gift sent to our members was Basin’s wetlands: a spillway to protect us from future floods. Atchafalaya sent by Judith, and all envelops and postage were paid by Basinkeeper responded to the flood by bringing our boat to rescue people Judith and her husband in the O’Neil Lane area of Baton Rouge.
    [Show full text]
  • Atchafalya Basin, Shortcut to the Gulf
    a release valve, carrying large amounts of about 51,000 people. As a major center Geography fl oodwaters to the Gulf. of coastal fi shing and oil fi eld industries, Because the Atchafalaya is a natural dis- Morgan City is located about 15 miles up- In The tributary of the Mississippi, there has long stream from the mouth of the Atchafalaya. been a concern that during a major fl ood Most of the basin, however, is sparsely News™ the Mississippi’s fl ow might overpower populated with the rural population living the fl ood structures and be diverted per- along the numerous levees, representing manently into the Atchafalaya. Such an the highest ground. uncontrolled diversion could leave the Flooding remains a problem in the Neal G. city of New Orleans high and dry. Conse- Atchafalaya Basin, as little of the land is Lineback quently, the Corps of Engineers has gone more than a few feet (1m) above the nor- to great lengths to make certain that does mal levels of the river, bayous, lakes and not happen. swamps. When heavy precipitation events ATCHAFALYA The Atchafalaya River’s course mean- occur over the basin or upstream on the ders as it fl ows slowly southward across Mississippi or Red rivers, the Atchafalaya BASIN, the Atchafalaya Basin, which represents River can rise, spreading the fl oodwaters one of the largest U.S. wetlands. This across the adjacent areas and acting as a SHORTCUT TO plain-like basin is covered with bayous, fl oodwater containment area. swamps and marshes. The bayous are The basin’s marsh lands also help brunt THE GULF small streams that have broken away from any storm surge that may occur along the Massive fl ooding in the lower Missis- or parallel the main stream and merge Gulf Coast, reducing property damage.
    [Show full text]