DOCSLIB.ORG

2017 Annual Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2017 Annual Report 2017 ANNUAL REPORT one million acres by the numbers 62 Most 854 easements The Montana Land Reliance Total number 40, 064 in one year partners with private of easements Largest protected (2000) landowners to permanently property acreage protect agricultural lands, g n i b fish and wildlife habitat, m a L Average and open space. n h property o J 1,2 21 acreage The immediate accomplishments of MLR’s m o c . Smallest conservation work are y h 1 p Cost in dollars to a protected measured in miles of r g o monitor one acre of t property o streambank preserved and h p property in 2017 acreage r e t .2 9 acres of land protected. n e k The lasting benefits of MLR’s work are the perpetuation of a lifestyle and 932,455 293 Total privately an economy that rely on Miles of blue- and enhanced public red-ribbon trout responsibly managed private acreage (MLR streams protected land and the increasingly acreage adjacent h t valuable Montana open to public lands) i m S spaces that will continue y d n to nourish the spirit of Median a R future generations. property 16 0 acreage 98,324 377,25 8,803 Most acres in one year (2007) Total ecosystem services value in dollars cproesnidnen et’sc ltetitner g the dots IT IS NOT HARD TO IMAGINE for four percent of the total. That’s privately-owned working terrains of what some of Montana’s most special a big deal. farms, ranches, and forests. Often, places would have looked like without these people believe that the former the long-term and persistent effort The moment Phil signed the is more deserving of our conservation of The Montana Land Reliance easement papers was the culmination attention and resources. (MLR). Places like the Smith River of four decades of hard work, Canyon country could have been unwavering vision, and persistent But we have always known that asphalt and houses instead of grass, effort of the MLR Board, staff, and the protection and conservation trees, and grazers. thousands of supporters. We’ve of our working landscapes is as had setbacks, leaps forward, and important as the protection of In this year’s annual report, you’ll Montana’s future is tied to the land thousands of cups of coffee around our public lands. The success of weave your way through the sage and to the people who live on and kitchen tables. landscape-level conservation lies brush steppes and prairie plains manage it. MLR envisions a future in the critical intersection of public of eastern Montana to the high with enduring landscapes that keep When I started with MLR in 1979, and private land. mountains of the Greater Yellowstone Montana’s agricultural lands and as the Treasurer and Secretary of Ecosystem, from the banks of the communities healthy and flourishing the Board, I never imagined what we HELPING RANCHING AND iconic Smith River to the far corners over the generations. would accomplish. As I reflect on FARMING FAMILIES stay on the of northwest Montana, through the those decades and the organization’s land while protecting river valleys, ecological transition zones, through On August 5, 2017, rancher and recent milestone, I do so with watersheds, wildlife corridors, winter the public lands and working lands, MLR Board member, Phil Rostad, took immense gratitude for the people range, and breeding habitat for and through the minds of the people the stage in front of over 400 MLR and places that have gotten us here wildlife exponentially increases the who have chosen to protect their landowners and supporters at the and for the collaborative nature of value of public lands Montanans love land for future generations. Million Acre Celebration on the these efforts: voluntary participation, so much. The two go hand-in-hand. Hilger Ranch near the Gates of the shared goals, pooled resources, The report is a story of the big Mountains, took the pen, and to and a deep commitment to place. The distinct challenge and reward picture and of the tiny puzzle pieces raucous cheers from the audience, of MLR’s work is that each property, coming together. It is a story of signed a conservation easement on MLR HAS THRIVED and succeeded, ranch, farm, parcel of land, and collaboration and of deep affection his family’s Martinsdale ranch, even during lean years, because we family is different and every owner for and affirmation of Montana’s local pushing the total easement acreage understand the sacred connections has different goals for their property. communities, working landscapes, held by MLR over the million-acre between people and their places, and I’m blown away every day by the staff and the natural world. mark. The ranch that hosted the party between working landscapes and at MLR who understand and respect is itself a part of that million acres. public lands. We understand the the uniqueness of the places where It is a story of the past, of the present, power of relationships and trust. they work and the people they and of the future. One million acres. MLR has secured work with. the most easement acres out of any There are some who would look at It is a story of Montana. land trust in the state and out of Montana and see two classes of Such practical respect is the true 25,692,063 total acres conserved landscapes: the publicly-owned parks discipline of MLR’s efforts. –George Olsen nationwide, MLR is responsible and wilderness preserves, and the SINCE 1978 7 The Montana Land Reliance 2017 has worked with private – 1 – Ko oten landowners all across Montana Shoco Ranch * – 836 acres ai – 2 – to meet their conservation Mountain Hi Ranch ** – 2,370 acres goals, including the protection of – 3 – major watersheds critical to Rostad Property – 4,615 acres – 4 – agriculture and wildlife habitat. Arthun Property – 4,421 acres – 5 – d a Lien Property – 92 acres e h t S a w 1,038,964 ACRES l – 6 – F a Craig Property II – 74 acres n of ecologically, agriculturally, and C – 7 – la rk historically important land, Brown Property – 62 acres F or ot and 1,728 miles of streambank – 8 – k Blackfo Schutz Property III – 628 acres are now protected under MLR’s 16 t – 9 – o 854 conservation easements. o Hamilton Ranch – 1,454 acres r C r lar e k t F t o – 10 – i rk Bintz Property – 400 acres B Crop/Hay/Pasture – 11 – X Bar T Ranch – 160 acres 172,876 6 – – 12 – Bi Roberts L7 Ranch (North ) – 24,622 acres g H Range/Forest ole 866,088 – 13 – – Roberts L7 Ranch (South) – 4,796 acres Elk Habitat – 14 – Ritchey Property – 40 acres 552,2 10 d – 15 – a e – h Micks Ranches II – 3,093 acres r e v Wetlands a – 16 – e 42,362 King Property – 567 acres B – Greater Yellowstone 48,230 ACRES Ecosystem 295,435 – Northern Continental *Partners: Lewis & Clark County Open Space Program, Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation, Divide Ecosystem Vital Ground, Montana Audubon Society 19,915 ** Partners: The Trust for Public Land, Department of Agriculture’s Agricultural Lands Easement (ALE) Program 2 M ilk M arias Teton Mi ssouri S un 1 ECOSYSTEMS h t i d Greater Yellowstone u J S Northern Continental Divide m i t h Northern Great Plains 12 Muss elshell tone 3 15 Yellows 10 13 n 8 so r n 2 fe o f s e i J d a M 14 r 9 n e 4 r e d 5 o G u h g w a g o i n l 11 o P l B a T t i n Ru by MLR EASEMENT EASEMENT DENSITY BY COUNTY MAJOR WATERSHEDS 1–10,000 acres 10,001 –25,000 acres BLUE- AND RED-RIBBON 25,001 –50,000 acres TROUT STREAMS More than 50,000 acres 3 taking a wide view “Like the sea there is something compelling about its distances and sweep. Nowhere except the sea is there quite the same subtlety of color, quite the same feeling of vastness .” – K. Ross Toole, Uncommon Land out east It was in this country around 1887 that Jarrod Broadus’s great-grandfather, Henry Bailey, homesteaded and began This is a land where the sky comes putting a ranch together. down the same distance all around, and those who live in it love it – “It’s an amazing valley. And this most of the time. particular part of this valley is even – K. Ross Toole, Uncommon Land more so. It’s home,” said Jarrod. IT IS A LAND WHERE THE SKY It is a land of life, and its history is comes down the same distance all visible from the rock art left by Native around. If you say those words to Americans and some settlers on the someone born and raised in eastern sandstones. Pronghorn antelope graze Montana they will nod knowingly. And, the sagebrush throughout the year. if you say the words Rosebud Creek, Mule deer roam the hills alongside one eastern Montanans will know you are of the most impressive elk herds in all talking about a creek that starts in of Montana; their trails wind up the the hills near Kirby, Montana, then steep side hills and into the rugged winds and meanders quietly through mountains. colorful scoria hills past generational ranches with cows grazing in front Yes, there are mountains in eastern Pronghorn antelope of wind- and water-carved sandstone Montana. castles. Flowing north, the creek ends its journey when it joins with Ungulates, raptors of all kinds, upland the Yellowstone River.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Smith River Complaint
    Timothy J. Preso Jenny K. Harbine Earthjustice 313 East Main Street Bozeman, MT 59715 Phone: (406) 586-9699 Fax: (406) 596-9695 [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for Plaintiffs MONTANA FOURTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT MEAGHER COUNTY ______________________________________ ) MONTANA ENVIRONMENTAL ) Case No. _______________ INFORMATION CENTER and ) EARTHWORKS, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR v. ) DECLARATORY RELIEF AND ) APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF ) MANDATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY and TINTINA ) ALASKA EXPLORATION, INC., ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) INTRODUCTION 1. This case challenges a decision by the Montana Department of Environmental Quality (“DEQ”) that has the potential to impair the ecological integrity and recreational value of the renowned Smith River and its tributaries. Specifically, this case challenges DEQ’s decision to approve Tintina Alaska Exploration Incorporated’s (“Tintina”) application to amend its exploration license to gain underground access to a mineral deposit at the Black Butte Copper Project near White Sulphur Springs, Montana, without adequately assessing the environmental impacts of such exploration activities—including potential impacts to the Smith River watershed—and in violation of DEQ’s clear legal duties. 2. On November 7, 2012, Tintina submitted an exploration license amendment proposal to expand exploration activities on its Black Butte Copper Project property, located approximately 15 miles north of White Sulphur Springs in Meagher County, Montana. As proposed, Tintina’s amended license would allow for the construction of an exploration tunnel, or “decline,” that would extend underground for nearly a mile into the upper Johnny Lee copper- cobalt-silver deposit zone. The decline is expected to produce a 10,000-ton bulk sample of rock for metallurgical testing.
    [Show full text]
  • Montana Fishing Regulations
    MONTANA FISHING REGULATIONS 20March 1, 2018 — F1ebruary 828, 2019 Fly fishing the Missouri River. Photo by Jason Savage For details on how to use these regulations, see page 2 fwp.mt.gov/fishing With your help, we can reduce poaching. MAKE THE CALL: 1-800-TIP-MONT FISH IDENTIFICATION KEY If you don’t know, let it go! CUTTHROAT TROUT are frequently mistaken for Rainbow Trout (see pictures below): 1. Turn the fish over and look under the jaw. Does it have a red or orange stripe? If yes—the fish is a Cutthroat Trout. Carefully release all Cutthroat Trout that cannot be legally harvested (see page 10, releasing fish). BULL TROUT are frequently mistaken for Brook Trout, Lake Trout or Brown Trout (see below): 1. Look for white edges on the front of the lower fins. If yes—it may be a Bull Trout. 2. Check the shape of the tail. Bull Trout have only a slightly forked tail compared to the lake trout’s deeply forked tail. 3. Is the dorsal (top) fin a clear olive color with no black spots or dark wavy lines? If yes—the fish is a Bull Trout. Carefully release Bull Trout (see page 10, releasing fish). MONTANA LAW REQUIRES: n All Bull Trout must be released immediately in Montana unless authorized. See Western District regulations. n Cutthroat Trout must be released immediately in many Montana waters. Check the district standard regulations and exceptions to know where you can harvest Cutthroat Trout. NATIVE FISH Westslope Cutthroat Trout Species of Concern small irregularly shaped black spots, sparse on belly Average Size: 6”–12” cutthroat slash— spots
    [Show full text]
  • FISHING NEWSLETTER 2020/2021 Table of Contents FWP Administrative Regions and Hatchery Locations
    FISHING NEWSLETTER 2020/2021 Table of Contents FWP Administrative Regions and Hatchery Locations .........................................................................................3 Region 1 Reports: Northwest Montana ..........................................................................................................5 Region 2 Reports: West Central Montana .....................................................................................................17 Region 3 Reports: Southwest Montana ........................................................................................................34 Region 4 Reports: North Central Montana ...................................................................................................44 Region 5 Reports: South Central Montana ...................................................................................................65 Region 6 Reports: Northeast Montana ........................................................................................................73 Region 7 Reports: Southeast Montana .........................................................................................................86 Montana Fish Hatchery Reports: .......................................................................................................................92 Murray Springs Trout Hatchery ...................................................................................................................92 Washoe Park Trout Hatchery .......................................................................................................................93
    [Show full text]
  • Connectivity in a Montane River Basin: Salmonid Use of a Major
    CONNECTIVITY IN A MONTANE RIVER BASIN: SALMONID USE OF A MAJOR TRIBUTARY IN THE SMITH RIVER SYSTEM by Thomas David Ritter A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Fish and Wildlife Management MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY Bozeman, Montana May 2015 ©COPYRIGHT by Thomas David Ritter 2015 All Rights Reserved ii DEDICATION I dedicate this thesis to my family. To my parents, Tom and Cathy, who not only raised me properly, but were my first teachers; you lead by example, instruction, and encouragement. To my partner in crime, Christopher, who provides advice and friendship as only a brother can. Words cannot express my gratitude. No matter what path I choose, you provide undying love, support, patience, and confidence that I can succeed. “If you don’t know where you’re going, you might not get there.” (Yogi Berra, “When You Come to the Fork in the Road, Take It!” 2002). Thanks to you, I’m finally there. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I first thank Dr. Al Zale, who provided unwavering support, guidance, and patience during the most developmental years of my personal and professional life; I was honored to have you as my advisor. I am grateful for my committee members, Drs. Kathi Irvine, Robert Gresswell, and Bradley Shepard, who were always generous with their time, exceedingly supportive, and never short on insight and expertise. This project would not have been possible without the logistical support of Grant Grisak and George Liknes from MTFWP, who went to great lengths to make sure I had the equipment and access necessary to succeed.
    [Show full text]
  • Phone (406) 586-9695 | Fax [email protected] [email protected]
    Jenny K. Harbine Katherine K. O’Brien Earthjustice 313 East Main Street Bozeman, MT 59715 (406) 586-9699 | Phone (406) 586-9695 | Fax [email protected] [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiffs MONTANA FOURTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT MEAGHER COUNTY MONTANA TROUT UNLIMITED, Case No. MONTANA ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION CENTER, TROUT UNLIMITED, EARTHWORKS, and AMERICAN RIVERS; COMPLAINT FOR Plaintiffs, DECLARATORY RELIEF v. MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, and TINTINA MONTANA INC.; Defendants. INTRODUCTION 1. Plaintiffs Montana Trout Unlimited, Montana Environmental Information Center, Trout Unlimited, Earthworks, and American Rivers (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) challenge the Montana Department of Environmental Quality’s (“DEQ”) approval of Tintina Montana Inc.’s (“Tintina”) permit application for the Black Butte Copper Mine, a major copper mining project proposed in the Smith River watershed of west-central Montana. The Smith River is one of Montana’s premier recreational rivers due to its spectacular natural beauty and abundant wild trout populations. 2. Tintina’s proposed mine would excavate about 440 tons of concentrated copper ore every day in the Smith River watershed. Over the life of the project, these mining activities would generate an estimated 12.9 million tons of tailings and nearly one million tons of waste rock and pollute waters within the Smith River watershed with metals and acid-generating minerals that are harmful or lethal to aquatic life. 3. DEQ is the agency charged with permitting mining activity under the Metal Mine Reclamation Act (“MMRA”), MCA § 82-4-301 et seq., and evaluating the environmental impacts of proposed mining activities under the Montana Environmental Policy Act (“MEPA”), MCA § 75-1-101 et seq.
    [Show full text]
  • Missoula County Weed District
    Partner Updates Big Horn Conservation District Maria Hopkins District Manager 724 West 3rd Street Hardin, MT 59034 Email: [email protected] Phone: 406-629-3229 Website: http://bighorncd.org/ AIS activity: Watercraft Inspection Station Location: Garrison Stoker Resort on Hwy 313, 7 miles South of Saint Xavier, MT and 12 miles North of Fort Smith, MT Year began doing this activity: 2019 Highlights: This year the Saint Xavier Station ran from July 18th to October 26th. The station’s hours were Thursday to Saturday, 7 am to 7 pm. The Big Horn Conservation District hired five part-time inspectors and one on-call inspector. The inspectors did a wonderful job checking watercrafts and educating the boaters. Inspected 1,320 watercraft. Plans/priorities for 2020: In 2020 the Saint Xavier Station hopes to run 7 days a week with 12-hour days. The Big Horn Conservation District will re-hire any 2019 staff that want to return and hire additional staff to cover the increased 2020 operating hours. In addition, the BHCD will focus on educating local boaters on the importance of check- stations and what they can do for a fast inspection. Bureau of Reclamation Jacob Bradford Natural Resource Specialist 2021 4th Ave N Billings, MT 59101 Email: [email protected] Phone: 406-247-7720 Website: usbr.gov The Bureau of Reclamation has provided approximately $4 million dollars to support Zebra/Quagga mussel management activities across the West since 2017, as part of the Department of Interior’s initiative to keep invasive dreissenid mussels out of the Columbia and Missouri River Basins and contain invasive mussels in the lower Colorado River.
    [Show full text]
  • The Erosion of the Racial Frontier: Settler Colonialism and the History
    THE EROSION OF THE RACIAL FRONTIER: SETTLER COLONIALISM AND THE HISTORY OF BLACK MONTANA, 1880-1930 by Anthony William Wood A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY Bozeman, Montana April 2018 ©COPYRIGHT by Anthony William Wood 2018 All Rights Reserved ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank the history faculty at Carroll College and Dr. Swarthout who pushed history majors such as myself to work as interns with the Montana State Historic Preservation Office in Helena, Montana. It was at SHPO that I was so fortunate to work for Kate Hampton, who had already worked tirelessly keeping the Montana’s African American Heritage Places Project alive for over a decade, and who continued to lead and guide me while I researched and wrote for the project for three years. Classes I took at MSU, especially Dr. Mark Fiege’s seminar on the American West, offered strikingly new approaches that opened up different methods as well as mountains of scholarship that would profoundly inform how I thought about race and the American West. I am further indebted to my wonderful committee members, Drs. Mary Murphey, Amanda Hendrix- Komoto, Billy Smith, and my chair, Mark Fiege for all their time spent talking with me about sections of my thesis, different approaches I might try, or even just listening as I tried to organize my ideas. I am also thankful and sorry to my office-mates Amanda Hardin and Jen Dunn who were unlucky enough to work within ear-shot.
    [Show full text]
  • White Sulphur Springs, Montana Historic Downtown Buildings Survey May 2019
    WHITE SULPHUR SPRINGS, MONTANA HISTORIC DOWNTOWN BUILDINGS SURVEY MAY 2019 MBAC, 225 Cruse Ave MPA, 44 W 6th Ave, Suite 110 Helena, Montana 59601 Helena, Montana 59601 406- 406-457-2822 Brian Obert, Executive Director Chere Jiusto, Executive Director Eric Seidensticker, Program Manager Christine Brown, Architectural Historian Dustin Kalanick, Staff Architect, AIA NCARB Madie Westrom, Survey Tech [email protected] The White Sulphur Springs Historical Survey and Community Outreach was made possible through the ongoing partnership between MPA and MBAC, the generous support of the Steele Reese Foundation, the National Endowment for the Humanities and the Montana History Foundation, and the friendship and kind assistance of the Meagher County Historical Society. Special Thanks for outstanding contributions to local history by Helen Hanson, Lee Rostad, George Kirkwood and to the many owners of WSS downtown properties for their contributions to our project. Photo Credits: as noted All other photos courtesy of Montana Preservation Alliance TABLE of CONTENTS APPENDIX B: Montana Historic Property Record Inventory Forms Introduction 5 6th Ave SW (White Sulphur Springs Depot) Historical Overview 10th Avenue and W Main South Side (Parberry/Ringling Mansion) 10th Ave and W Main North Side (Almon Spencer Home) Architectural Patterns White Sulphur Springs Grain Elevator Potential for National Register Listings 11 East Main & Central (Rocky Mountain Meagher Co News) Conclusion 12 West Main (Van Oil Co. Gas Station) Bibliography 13 East Main (Meagher
    [Show full text]
  • Helena and Lewis & Clark National Forests Forest Plan Assessment
    Helena and Lewis & Clark National Forests Forest Plan Assessment Appendix C, Scenery 2015 Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 1 Scenic Character ......................................................................................................................................... 1 Existing Scenic Integrity .............................................................................................................................. 1 Big Belts Geographic Area .............................................................................................................................. 2 Location ...................................................................................................................................................... 2 Scenic Character ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Scenic Integrity ........................................................................................................................................... 8 Castles Geographic Area ................................................................................................................................. 9 Location ...................................................................................................................................................... 9 Scenic Character ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MINERAL INVESTIGATIONS U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY RESOURCES MAP MR-96 PAMPHLET MAP SHOWING THE LOCATION OF PRODUCTIVE LODE AND PLACER GOLD MINES IN MONTANA By David Frishman, I.E. Elliott, E.E. Foord, R.C. Pearson, and W.H. Raymond INTRODUCTION mines that ceased production long ago, the list of commodities present is likely incomplete. For lode This pamphlet contains tabular information keyed mines having recorded production, not all the to the accompanying map. Table 1 lists site names commodities listed were necessarily recovered some numerically keyed to the map; sites are organized by may be minor elements that are listed because they county and numbered consecutively by mining district record the geochemical signature of the deposit. within each county. Site numbers were assigned Industrial commodities, however (like silicon or abrasive geographically by county with the intention of making it sand), are listed only when they were produced. Silver as easy as possible to find a particular number on the is listed as a commodity along with gold for aT placer map after the site name and number have been mines because we are confident that silver was produced identified in table 1. The site name listed is the one and, eventually, refined, even from those placer deposits that seemed to be most commonly used and is usually whose gold was of high fineness. the name of a mine (for lodes) or a creek or gulch (for Host rock type as given in table 1 is that from placers). In some cases, the name is that of a claim, a which the gold or gold-bearing minerals were ertracted group of claims, or, rarely, an exploration project.
    [Show full text]
  • Yellowstone National Park Fishing Guide
    Yellowstone National Park Fishing Guide Armand meander dubitably? Sayre roams his skillion modulate traitorously, but gristly Avery never corbelled so hourly. Sorrowful and propagandistic Parnell never gemmates unusably when Rem transhipped his snakebites. Finally Yellowstone National Park own home and incredible fly-fishing waters available via those brief book with Montana Fly Fishing Guides Stay and Fish Package If. Watch for guide service national park in guiding service information on later in to ensure angler guides show you will ever caught in the winter wonderland. By sleep outside the national park fishing yellowstone lake trout and other waters in camp on the potential for? What do Yellowstone cutthroat trout eat? You so float your guide services or stream fish troll with his own boat to float. Guided Fly together In Montana and Yellowstone Madison. Teton Fly Fishing Fly the Guide Jackson Hole Wyoming. Yellowstone is an idyllic place to fish Great Falls Tribune. Please try again. Fly fishing the true River in Yellowstone National Park. The US National Park Service says fishing activity can bill and even. Casting fishing trips in its Grand Teton and Yellowstone National Park region. Fly fishing Experience 24 The a Guide to Fly in with Streamers with Dave. Fly overhead near Cooke City MT Skyline Guest Ranch and. Jacklin's Fly Shop and making Service benefit the closest fly shop at many west entrance to Yellowstone National Park Our shop is certainly full fly fishing pro shop stocked. Find local wildlife take guide school in this trip so we work on fishing yellowstone guide. Currently not call us that guides who has guided fly fishing guide contacts and park itself sits right.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Falls Coal Field
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIRBCTOK 356 GEOLOGY .OF THE GREAT FALLS COAL FIELD MONTANA BY CASSIUS A. FISHER WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1909 CONTENTS. Page. Introduction.............................................................. 7 Literature................................................................ 7 Topography.............................................................. 14 Relief......................:........................................ 14 Drainage.............................................................. 16 Missouri River.................................................... 16 Sun River...............................................'......... 17 Smith River. ..............................:.............. ........ 17 Belt Creek....................................................... 18 Other small streams............................................... 19 Culture.................................................................. 20 Descriptive geology........................................................ 21 Stratigraphy.......................................... v .............. 21 General outline................................................... 21 Sedimentary rocks................................................. 24 Carboniferous system.....'..................................... 24 Madison limestone......................................... 24 General statement.................................... 24 Castle limestone....................................... 24
    [Show full text]