DOCSLIB.ORG

Transport Research Market Uptake (Market-Up) Deliverable: D 2.1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Transport Research Market Uptake (Market-Up) Deliverable: D 2.1 Project ID: 265841 Transport Research Market Uptake (Market-up) Deliverable: D 2.1 Characterisation of the context of RTD initiatives per sectoral area Lead partner: UNIZA Consortium: Project co-funded by the European Commission TIS (PORTUGAL) - Co-ordinator within the Seventh Framework Programme CLEPA (BELGIUM) EMEC (BELGIUM) FRAUNHOFER (GERMANY) BME (HUNGARY) INOVA+ (PORTUGAL) UNIZA (SLOVAKIA) UA (BELGIUM) INNOVA (ITALY) Due Date of Deliverable: October 2011 Start Date of Project: 1 October 2010 Completion Date of Deliverable: December 2011 Duration: 24 Months Dissemination Level PU Public X PP Restricted to other programme participants (including the Commission Services) RE Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (including the Commission Services) CO Confidential, only for members of the consortium (including the Commission Services) Market-up D2.1: Characterisation of the context of RTD initiatives per sectoral area Foreword This report, FP7 Market-up project Deliverable 2.1, was prepared by the team at UNIZA with contributions from all members of the project consortium. The key data concerning Member States was collected by the Market-up team and provided to Transport NCP‟s for validation purposes. Market-up team is particularly thankful to the NCPs from Denmark, Austria, Latvia, Portugal, Slovakia, France and Lithuania for their contribution in the review of our findings. Opinions on main findings on barriers and particularly those faced by the transport SMEs were discussed with Technological Platforms during data collection and specific discussion topics have circulated and feedback asked for. Main findings from D2.1 were also presented in the Review Workshop held on the 26th October in Brussels, which discussion helped to improve our analysis and to enrich the discussion on perspectives for innovation in the transport sector. This document is set to be Public (PU), and should be referenced as: Market-up consortium (2011), “Market-up, Characterisation of the context of RTD initiatives per sectoral area - Deliverable 2.1”, Market-up project, funded by the European Commission under the 7th FP QUALITY CONTROL INFORMATION: Version Date Description 1 June 2011 First Draft 2 August 2011 Intermediate version, some barriers and drivers identified 3 October 2011 Draft version for Review Workshop 4- November 2011 Final version for Quality Control 5- Final December 2011 Final version upload in the system 6 February 2012 Incorporation of EC comments Disclaimer 2 This project has been funded with support from the European Commission under Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) Market-up D2.1: Characterisation of the context of RTD initiatives per sectoral area The content of the publication herein is the sole responsibility of the publishers and it does not necessarily represent the views expressed by the European Commission or its services. While the information contained in the documents is believed to be accurate, the authors(s) or any other participant in the Market-up consortium make no warranty of any kind with regard to this material including, but not limited to the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. Neither the Market-up Consortium nor any of its members, their officers, employees or agents shall be responsible or liable in negligence or otherwise howsoever in respect of any inaccuracy or omission herein. Without derogating from the generality of the foregoing neither the Market-up Consortium nor any of its members, their officers, employees or agents shall be liable for any direct or indirect or consequential loss or damage caused by or arising from any information advice or inaccuracy or omission herein. 3 This project has been funded with support from the European Commission under Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) Market-up D2.1: Characterisation of the context of RTD initiatives per sectoral area Table of Contents FOREWORD ...................................................................................................................................................... 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................................ 4 LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................................... 6 LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................................. 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................... 8 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 21 1.1 METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH FOR WP 2 ..................................................................................................... 23 1.2 STRUCTURE OF THIS REPORT ....................................................................................................................... 25 2. OVERVIEW OF ACTORS AND REGIONS AT THE EU LEVEL ........................................................................ 26 2.1 RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTIONS AT THE EUROPEAN LEVEL AND THE EUROPEAN RESEARCH AREA ............ 26 2.2 SMES INVOLVEMENT IN R&D ACROSS EU .................................................................................................... 30 2.3 OVERVIEW OF R&D INVESTMENT IN EUROPE ................................................................................................. 31 2.3.1 FP7 transport projects ..................................................................................................................... 44 3. MODAL COMPETENCIES ......................................................................................................................... 57 3.1 RAIL MODE ............................................................................................................................................. 57 3.1.1 Railway market and industry characteristics .................................................................................. 57 3.1.2 Actors and stakeholders in railway sector ....................................................................................... 58 3.1.3 Funding sources and R&D investment in railway sector ................................................................. 86 3.2 ROAD SECTOR .......................................................................................................................................... 87 3.2.1 Road market and industry characteristics ....................................................................................... 87 3.2.2 Actors and stakeholders in road sector ........................................................................................... 89 3.2.3 Funding sources and R&D investment in the road sector ............................................................. 105 3.3 AIR AND AERONAUTICS ............................................................................................................................ 106 3.3.1 Air and Aeronautics market and industry characteristics ............................................................. 106 3.3.2 Actors and stakeholders in aeronautics ........................................................................................ 107 3.3.3 Funding sources and R&D investment in aeronautics ................................................................... 123 3.4 MARITIME TRANSPORT ............................................................................................................................ 124 3.4.1 Maritime market and industry characteristics .............................................................................. 124 3.4.2 Actors and stakeholders in maritime sector .................................................................................. 126 3.4.3 Funding sources and R&D investment in maritime ....................................................................... 138 3.5 INLAND WATERWAYS ............................................................................................................................... 140 3.5.1 Inland waterways market and industry characteristics ................................................................ 140 3.5.2 Actors and stakeholders in inland waterways ............................................................................... 142 3.5.3 Funding sources and R&D investment in inland waterways ......................................................... 154 3.6 INTERMODAL SECTOR .............................................................................................................................. 154 3.6.1 Intermodal market and industry characteristics ........................................................................... 154 3.6.2 Actors and stakeholders in intermodal sector ............................................................................... 157 3.6.3 Funding sources and R&D investment in intermodal sector.......................................................... 171 3.7 HORIZONTAL ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................................ 173 4. BARRIERS AND DRIVERS TO MARKET UPTAKE OF RTD RESULTS ........................................................... 175 4.1 TIS APPROACH METHODOLOGY
Load more

Recommended publications
  • List of Numeric Codes for Railway Companies (RICS Code) Contact : [email protected]
    List of numeric codes for railway companies (RICS Code) contact : [email protected] reference : http://www.uic.org/rics code short name full name country request date allocation date modifieddate beginvalidityof validityendof recent Freight Passenger Infra- structure Holding Integrated Other url 0006 StL Holland Stena Line Holland BV NL 01/07/2004 01/07/2004 x http://www.stenaline.nl/ferry/ 0010 VR VR-Yhtymä Oy FI 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 x http://www.vr.fi/ 0012 TRFSA Transfesa ES 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 04/10/2016 x http://www.transfesa.com/ 0013 OSJD OSJD PL 12/07/2000 12/07/2000 x http://osjd.org/ 0014 CWL Compagnie des Wagons-Lits FR 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 x http://www.cwl-services.com/ 0015 RMF Rail Manche Finance GB 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 x http://www.rmf.co.uk/ 0016 RD RAILDATA CH 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 x http://www.raildata.coop/ 0017 ENS European Night Services Ltd GB 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 x 0018 THI Factory THI Factory SA BE 06/05/2005 06/05/2005 01/12/2014 x http://www.thalys.com/ 0019 Eurostar I Eurostar International Limited GB 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 x http://www.eurostar.com/ 0020 OAO RZD Joint Stock Company 'Russian Railways' RU 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 x http://rzd.ru/ 0021 BC Belarusian Railways BY 11/09/2003 24/11/2004 x http://www.rw.by/ 0022 UZ Ukrainski Zaliznytsi UA 15/01/2004 15/01/2004 x http://uz.gov.ua/ 0023 CFM Calea Ferată din Moldova MD 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 x http://railway.md/ 0024 LG AB 'Lietuvos geležinkeliai' LT 28/09/2004 24/11/2004 x http://www.litrail.lt/ 0025 LDZ Latvijas dzelzceļš LV 19/10/2004 24/11/2004 x http://www.ldz.lv/ 0026 EVR Aktsiaselts Eesti Raudtee EE 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 x http://www.evr.ee/ 0027 KTZ Kazakhstan Temir Zholy KZ 17/05/2004 17/05/2004 x http://www.railway.ge/ 0028 GR Sakartvelos Rkinigza GE 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 x http://railway.ge/ 0029 UTI Uzbekistan Temir Yullari UZ 17/05/2004 17/05/2004 x http://www.uzrailway.uz/ 0030 ZC Railways of D.P.R.K.
    [Show full text]
  • General Court of the European Union PRESS RELEASE No 5/15 Luxembourg, 15 January 2015
    General Court of the European Union PRESS RELEASE No 5/15 Luxembourg, 15 January 2015 Judgment in Case T-1/12 Press and Information France v European Commission The General Court confirms that the aid granted by the SNCF to SeaFrance is incompatible with the internal market SeaFrance, now wound up, was a French public limited company that was indirectly 100% owned by the French public entity the SNCF. It operated maritime passenger and freight transport services between the ports of Calais and Dover. In 2009, SeaFrance owned six vessels and employed 1 550 staff. From 2008, SeaFrance’s financial situation systematically deteriorated owing to unfavourable conditions, internal difficulties and industrial action. The SNCF therefore set up a credit line in favour of SeaFrance. That rescue aid was approved by the Commission on 18 August 2010.1 The French authorities subsequently notified the Commission of a restructuring aid package in favour of SeaFrance along with a restructuring plan. That restructuring was to be financed mainly by State aid in the form of a recapitalisation of SeaFrance in the amount of €223 million. Following a complaint of a competitor of SeaFrance, the French authorities communicated, at the end of 2011, a modified restructuring plan: the recapitalisation of SeaFrance was now to be limited to €166.3 million and to be accompanied by two loans granted by the SNCF. The first loan, of €99.7 million, was intended to finance the restructuring, while the second loan sought to replace a loan pertaining to one of the vessels of the fleet. By decision of 24 October 2011,2 the Commission found that the rescue aid agreed in 2010 and the restructuring measures set out in the 2011 plan (recapitalisation and loans) constituted State aid incompatible with the internal market.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Report
    2O14 FINANCIAL REPORT SNCF.COM O1 — ANNUAL MANAGEMENT REPORT PAGE 04 O2 — SNCF MOBILITÉS GROUP CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PAGE 32 O3 — REPORT ON THE SNCF MOBILITÉS GROUP’S CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND INTERNAL CONTROL PAGE 126 02 — SNCF MOBILITÉS FINANCIAL REPORT 2014 MANAGEMENT S TATEMENT FOR FINANCIAL REPORT LA PLAINE SAINT-DENIS, 12 FEBRUARY 2015 We attest that, to the best of our knowledge, the consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the applicable accounting principles and give a true and fair view of the assets and liabilities and the financial position of the Group as of 31 December 2014 and of the results of its operations for the year then ended, and that the accompanying management report fairly presents the changes in operations, results and financial position of the Group and a description of its main risks and uncertainties. GUILLAUME PEPY MATHIAS EMMERICH THE CHAIRMAN EXECUTIVE VICE-PRESIDENT, PERFORMANCE SNCF MOBILITÉS FINANCIAL REPORT 2014 — 03 O1 — ANNUAL MANAGEMENT REPORT IFRS – In € millions 04 — SNCF MOBILITÉS FINANCIAL REPORT 2014 SNCF MOBILITÉS GROUP IN 2014 GROUP RESULTS AND FINANCIAL POSITION CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 1. Major events of the year 06 1. General observations on group results 08 1. Board of Directors 30 2. Key figures 07 2. Activity and results by division 11 2. Management team 30 3. Subsequent events 07 3. Net investments and net debt 17 4. Consolidated statement of financial position and ratios 18 5. Financial relations with the French State, RFF (SNCF Réseau as at 1 January 2015) and local authorities 19 6. Employee matters 20 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Le Cheminot De France
    LeLe CheminotCheminot dede FranceFrance Nouvelle édition N° 33 - Janvier / mars 2013 (1,60 ) Journal de l’Union Fédérale des Cheminots et Activités Complémentaires Élections CA 2013 Nouvel administrateur AG ERDEVEN salariés CFDT Nouveau Bureau National UFCAC-CFDT Pascal Lanzillotti élu CFDT Une nouvelle équipe CFDT pour ‘ agir autrement ’ ! Notations 2013 : Réforme du système Quand la littérature le compte n’y est pas ! ferroviaire : halte au managériale tord le cou aux dogmatisme de Bruxelles idées reçues Élection des représentants des salariés au Conseil d’Administration du groupe SNCF. La CFDT progresse ! Le Changement es élections campagne axée principalement sur militants que la CFDT a pu conforter Sommaire pour agir autrement ! CA se sont la lutte contre l’abstention, qui est en son siège au CA, ce qui permet à Pascal Ldéroulées le principe plus pénalisante pour notre Lanzillotti d’être élu dans cette instance. 5 février 2013. Organisation Syndicale. ’année 2012 aura été celle du chan- Ces élections se Avec un score de 11,93 %, la CFDT a Pour autant, Il va nous falloir continuer à gement, changement à la tête de sont passées selon progressé de 2 points dans l’EPIC. parcourir le terrain et tisser notre réseau ● Edito P 2 l’État avec un nouveau Président le mode traditionnel de l’urne et du Avec 13,21 % des suffrages au niveau du pour préparer les prochaines échéances bulletin papier glissé dans l’enveloppe, groupe, la progression est de 2,4 points électorales de mars 2014. ● Élections des représentants des Lde la République et un
    [Show full text]
  • Base Prospectus Dated 10 April 2019
    Base Prospectus dated 10 April 2019 SNCF MOBILITÉS €12,000,000,000 Euro Medium Term Note Programme Under the Euro Medium Term Note Programme (the Programme) described in this Base Prospectus (the Base Prospectus), SNCF Mobilités (the Issuer), subject to compliance with all relevant laws, regulations and directives, may from time to time issue outside the Republic of France Euro Medium Term Notes (the Notes). The aggregate nominal amount of Notes outstanding will not at any time exceed €12,000,000,000 (or its equivalent in other currencies) subject to increase as described herein. Any Notes issued under the Programme on or after the date of this Base Prospectus are issued subject to the provisions described herein. Notes will be issued in one or more series (each a Series). Each Series shall be in bearer form and may be issued in one or more tranches (each a Tranche) on different issue dates and on terms otherwise identical (except in relation to the interest commencement dates and matters related thereto). The Notes may be issued on a continuing basis to one or more of the Dealers specified under "Summary of the Programme" and any additional Dealer appointed under the Programme from time to time by the Issuer (each a Dealer and together the Dealers), which appointment may be for a specific issue or on an ongoing basis. References in this Base Prospectus to the "relevant Dealer" shall be, in the case of an issue of Notes being (or intended to be) subscribed by more than one Dealer, to all Dealers agreeing to subscribe such Notes.
    [Show full text]
  • SNCF Mobilités 31 March 2017 Update Following Fiscal Year 2016 Results
    CORPORATES CREDIT OPINION SNCF Mobilités 31 March 2017 Update Following Fiscal Year 2016 Results Update Summary Rating Rationale In accordance with our Government-Related Issuers rating methodology, SNCF Mobilités' Aa3 issuer rating incorporates a four-notch uplift from the baa1 baseline credit assessment (BCA), reflecting the strong relationship between the company and the French government (Aa2 stable). RATINGS SNCF Mobilités' BCA is constrained by the company's weak profitability, owing mainly to the SNCF Mobilites Domicile Paris, France poor operating performance of some TGV (high-speed trains) lines, the intercity services and Long Term Rating Aa3 the freight division. We expect the company's Moody's-adjusted EBITA margin will remain flat Type LT Issuer Rating at around 3.0% in 2017, a level that is weak for the current BCA. More positively, the BCA Outlook Stable is supported by our expectation that leverage will remain broadly stable at around 5.7x-6.0x throughout 2017, in line with 2016, a level that we deem compatible with a BCA in the baa Please see the ratings section at the end of this report for more information. The ratings and outlook shown category. reflect information as of the publication date. SNCF Mobilités' baa1 BCA reflects the company's solid business profile, underpinned by (1) its large scale and good degree of international diversification, with approximately 30% of revenue generated outside France; (2) the company's role as a quasi-monopoly in the domestic Contacts passenger railway segment; and (3) the large share of its revenue derived from French- Lorenzo Re 39-02-9148-1123 government-related authorities (approximately 26%, including under public service remit mass VP-Senior Analyst [email protected] transit activities for French regional and local authorities and excluding Keolis business), which provides some stability to and visibility into the top line.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapport Financier SNCF RESEAU 2019
    31 December 2019 SNCF RÉSEAU GROUP FINANCIAL REPORT In € millions 15-17 rue Jean-Philippe Rameau – 93212 La Plaine Saint-Denis Cedex sncf -reseau.com 01 – MANAGEMENT STATEMENT ON THE FINANCIAL REPORT PAGE 003 02 – INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT REPORT ON THE SNCF RÉSEAU CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PAGE 005 03 – SNCF RÉSEAU CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PAGE 057 04 – MANAGEMENT REPORT ON THE SNCF RÉSEAU FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PAGE 121 05 – SNCF RÉSEAU FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PAGE 139 06 – STATUTORY AUDITORS’ REPORT ON THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PAGE 178 07 – STATUTORY AUDITORS’ REPORT ON THE STATUTORY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PAGE 184 08 – STATUTORY AUDITORS’ REPORT ON CSR INFORMATION PAGE 185 01 – MANAGEMENT STATEMENT ON THE FINANCIAL REPORT Statement sncf -reseau.com MANAGEMENT STATEMENT ON THE FINANCIAL REPORT We attest that, to the best of our knowledge, the financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the applicable accounting principles and give a true and fair view of the assets and liabilities and the financial position of the Group as at 31 December 2019 and of the results of its operations for the year then ended, and that the accompanying management report fairly presents the changes in operations, results and financial position of the Group and a description of its main risks and uncertainties. La Plaine Saint-Denis, 25 February 2020 Alain QUINET Hugues DE NICOLAY Deputy Chief Executive Officer, Deputy General Director, Finance & Purchasing 4 - 2019 SNCF RESEAU FINANCIAL REPORT 02 – INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT REPORT ON THE SNCF RÉSEAU CONSOLIDATED FINANCIALManagement report STATEMENTS IFRS – In € millions 2019 SNCF RESEAU FINANCIAL REPORT - 5 02 - Management report CONTENTS 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Workshop 2013 02-2
    WORKSHOP 2013 Sota el patrocini de: Cercle Fundació Abertis Fundació Cercle d'Infraestructures d’Infraestructures Relator: Lluís Inglada (Institut Cerdà) Comitè organitzador: Pere Macias Modest Batlle Toni Brunet Sergi Loughney El futur de les Carles Cabrera Lluís Inglada infraestructures Josep Maria Oliveras Sílvia Borges de transport: Secretaria de redacció: Silvia Borges [email protected] competència o Disseny i maquetació: complementarietat Fabrizio Rodilossi [email protected] entre modes Impressió: Gràfiques Ossó [email protected] Correcció: Glòria Farrés Castell de Castellet i La Gornal D.L. B-27.592-2013 4 de octubre de 2013 El futur de les infraestructures de transport: competència o complementarietat entre modes a jornada de treball de les Fundacions Abertis i participació del director del Port de Barcelona, José Al- Cercle d'Infraestructures al Castell de Castellet berto Carbonell, de Jaume Bonavia, director d'Alfil Lo- de Foix es va dedicar, el 2013, a les relacions de gistics, i del director de Logística de BASF, José Curado. complementarietat i de competència entre mo- Com és habitual, en el Workshop van participar també Ldes de transport. alts dirigents de les administracions competents en in- Cal recordar que aquell any la crisi econòmica era espe- fraestructures i transports, el secretari general d’Infraes- cialment intensa, i que en el camp de les infraestructu- tructures del Ministeri de Foment, Manuel Niño, el se- res tots els indicadors d'activitat assenyalaven mínims. cretari general de Territori i Mobilitat de la Generalitat, En aquest context van voler presentar experiències que Ricard Font, i el Sr. Patrick Boeuf, responsable del sector poguessin assenyalar camins de sortida al sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Compte Rendu Mercredi 8 Juillet 2015 Commission Séance De 9 Heures 30 Du Développement Durable Et De L’Aménagement Du Territoire Compte Rendu N° 60
    Compte rendu Mercredi 8 juillet 2015 Commission Séance de 9 heures 30 du développement durable et de l’aménagement du territoire Compte rendu n° 60 – En application de l’article 13 de la Constitution, audition de M. Frédéric Saint-Geours, candidat à la présidence du conseil de surveillance de la SNCF ; audition de M. Guillaume Pepy, SESSION EXTRAORDINAIRE DE 2014-2015 candidat à la présidence du directoire de la SNCF ; audition de M. Jacques Rapoport, candidat à la présidence déléguée du directoire de la SNCF .............................................................. 2 – Votes sur les nominations .................................................. 30 Présidence de M. Jean-Paul Chanteguet Président — 2 — La Commission du développement durable et de l’aménagement du territoire a entendu, en application de l’article 13 de la Constitution, M. Frédéric Saint-Geours, candidat à la présidence du conseil de surveillance de la SNCF ; M. Guillaume Pepy, candidat à la présidence du directoire de la SNCF ; M. Jacques Rapoport, candidat à la présidence déléguée du directoire de la SNCF. M. le président Jean-Paul Chanteguet. Mes chers collègues, notre séance d’aujourd’hui est un peu particulière car il nous appartient, en application de l’article 13 de la Constitution, d’auditionner trois candidats dont les nominations sont envisagées par le Président de la République : M. Frédéric Saint-Geours, à la présidence du conseil de surveillance de la SNCF, M. Guillaume Pepy, à la présidence du directoire de la SNCF, et M. Jacques Rapoport, à la présidence déléguée du directoire de la SNCF. J’ai écrit aux responsables des groupes politiques pour leur présenter les modalités de déroulement de notre réunion.
    [Show full text]
  • A RPL Through RDF: Expressive Navigation in RDF Graphs
    A RPL through RDF: Expressive Navigation in RDF Graphs Harald Zauner1, Benedikt Linse1,2,TimFurche1,3, and François Bry1 1 Institute for Informatics, University of Munich, Oettingenstraße 67, 80538 München, Germany 2 Thomson Reuters, Landsberger Straße 191a, 80687 München, Germany 3 Oxford University Computing Laboratory, Wolfson Building, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QD, England http://rpl.pms.ifi.lmu.de/ Abstract. RPL (pronounced “ripple”) is the most expressive path lan- guage for navigating in RDF graphs proposed to date that can still be evaluated with polynomial combined complexity. RPL is a lean language well-suited for integration into RDF rule languages. This integration en- ables a limited form of recursion for traversing RDF paths of unknown length at almost no additional cost over conjunctive triple patterns. We demonstrate the power, ease, and efficiency of RPL with two appli- cations on top of the RPL Web interface. The demonstrator implements RPL by transformation to extended nested regular expressions (NREs). For these extended NREs we have implemented an evaluation algorithm with polynomial data complexity. To the best of our knowledge, this demo is the first implementation of NREs (or similarly expressive RDF path languages) with this complexity. 1Motivation With the promise of exciting “new kinds of usage scenarios”, you finally got your boss at company C to embrace linked data and connect your community forum and contact database to other online communities and FOAF profiles of your contacts. Your boss now wants to put that technology to use: “I want to cooperate with X on topic Y ! Can you get me the name of any person that works at X and that’s connected to us via people that are also interested in Y (so that they have an interest in connecting us).
    [Show full text]
  • R Rap Ppor Rt D D'inf for Rma Atio On
    — 1 — N° 4154 ______ ASSEMBLÉE NATIONALE CONSTITUTION DU 4 OCTOBRE 1958 QUATORZIÈME LÉGISLATURE Enregistré à la Présidence de l'Assemblée nationale le 19 octobre 2016. RAPPORT D’INFORMATION DÉPOSÉ PAR LA COMMISSION DU DÉVELOPPEMENT DURABLE ET DE L’AMÉNAGEMENT DU TERRITOIRE en application de l’article 145-7 du Règlement sur la mise en application de la loi n° 2014-872 du 4 août 2014 portant réforme ferroviaire ET PRÉSENTÉ PAR M. GILLES SAVARY et M. BERTRAND PANCHER Députés —— — 3 — SOMMAIRE ___ Pages INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 9 PREMIÈRE PARTIE : LES OBJECTIFS DE LA RÉFORME DU 4 AOÛT 2014 ................................................................................................................ 11 I. RÉDUIRE LES FAIBLESSES ET LES DYSFONCTIONNEMENTS INTRINSÈQUES AU SYSTÈME FERROVIAIRE FRANÇAIS ............................ 11 A. UNE GOUVERNANCE AMBIGUË ET OBSOLÈTE ......................................... 11 B. UNE DYNAMIQUE D’ENDETTEMENT NON SOUTENABLE ........................ 14 II. PARACHEVER LA LOI DU 8 DÉCEMBRE 2009 DANS LA PERSPECTIVE OUVERTE PAR LA DIRECTIVE « RECAST » ET LE QUATRIÈME « PAQUET FERROVIAIRE » EUROPÉEN ............................................................ 17 III. GENÈSE ET PRINCIPALES DISPOSITIONS DE LA RÉFORME DU 4 AOÛT 2014 ............................................................................................................... 27 DEUXIÈME PARTIE : LE CONTENU DE LA RÉFORME DU 4 AOÛT 2014 ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Concurrence Et Transport
    Concurrences REVUE DES DROITS DE LA CONCURRENCE | COMPETITION LAW REVIEW Concurrence et transport Conférence l Concurrences N° 4-2015 www.concurrences.com Jean-François Cordet Préfet de la région Nord-Pas-de-Calais Lille Grégoire Marlot Directeur régulation Europe économie, SNCF Réseau, Paris Anne Yvrande-Billon Vice-présidente, Autorité de régulation des activités ferroviaires (ARAF), Paris Umberto Berkani Rapporteur général adjoint, Autorité de la concurrence, Paris Sylvain Justier Avocat associé, Magenta, Paris Jean-François Benevise Directeur régional, DIRECCTE du Nord-Pas-de-Calais, Lille Conférence Concurrence et transport Lille, 16 avril 2015 Institut Pasteur DISCOURS D’oUVERTURE DEUXIÈME PARTIE Jean-François Cordet Préfet de la région Nord-Pas-de-Calais Lille Enjeux et problématiques du secteur du transport PREMIÈRE PARTIE au regard du droit Concurrence et de la concurrence régulation dans L’action de l’Autorité de la concurrence dans le secteur des transports Art. Intellectuelle). Personal use of this document is authorised within the limits Intellectuelle and DRM protection. L. 335-2 Code de la Propriété L 122-5 le secteur ferroviaire Umberto Berkani Rapporteur général adjoint, Autorité de la concurrence, Paris La concurrence dans le transport ferroviaire : Enjeux et problématique Complémentarité et interaction du droit Grégoire Marlot de la concurrence et du droit sectoriel Directeur régulation Europe économie, SNCF Réseau, Paris Sylvain Justier Avocat associé, Magenta, Paris Quelles perspectives d’ouverture à la concurrence du marché du transport ferroviaire en France ? Anne Yvrande-Billon DISCOURS DE CLÔTURE Jean-François Benevise Vice-présidente, Autorité de régulation des activités ferroviaires (ARAF), Paris Directeur régional, DIRECCTE du Nord-Pas-de-Calais, Lille Concurrences + www.concurrences.com The papers of this conference délit pénalement sanctionné jusqu'à 3 ans d'emprisonnement et 300 000 € d'amende (art.
    [Show full text]