Hypotheses on Nationalism and War Author(s): Stephen van Evera Source: International Security, Vol. 18, No. 4 (Spring, 1994), pp. 5-39 Published by: The MIT Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539176 . Accessed: 07/09/2011 07:32 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact
[email protected]. The MIT Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to International Security. http://www.jstor.org Hypotheses on StephenVan Evera Nationalismand War Scholars have written widely on the causes of nationalism'but said littleabout its effects,especially its effectson internationalpolitics. Most strikingly,the impact of nationalism on the risk of war has barely been explored. Most authors take the war- causing characterof nationalism for granted, assuming it without proof or explanation.2Factors that govern the size of the dangers posed by nationalism are neglected. What types of nationalismare most likelyto cause war? What background conditions catalyze or dampen this causal process? These ques- StephenVan Everateaches in thepolitical science department at theMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Thanks to RobertArt, Don Blackmer,David Laitin,John Mearsheimer, Barry Posen, JackSnyder, and Stephen Walt forsharing theirthoughts on nationalismand theircomments on this paper.