Israel by Patent Technology 1994-1999 Total Number of Patents = 3249
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Diffusion of Academic R&D Capabilities as an Industrial Innovation Policy? — The Development of Israel’s IT Industry Dan Breznitz MIT-IPC-04-006 May 2004 Diffusion of Academic R&D Capabilities as an Industrial Innovation Policy? The Development of Israel’s IT Industry Dan Breznitz MIT IPC Working Paper IPC-04-006 May 2004 In the last decade, three countries have figured prominently as cases of late-developing countries that achieved worldwide success with their information technology (IT) industries: India, Ireland, and Israel. This paper focuses on the Israeli case and argues that unlike India and Ireland, Israel’s competitive advantage in the IT industries, is in research and development (R&D). The paper’s main arguments are (a) that the declared aim of Israel’s industrial policy has been to develop exactly such a system of innovation we see in Israel today; but, (b) these policies, focused on diffusion and not on creation of capabilities, were successful only because of the existence of an already sophisticated and extensive R&D capability in the universities – markedly different from other newly-industrialized countries. Looking at the present the paper concludes that the same operational model that led Israel’s IT industry to success might now be undermining its future growth. The views expressed herein are the author’s responsibility and do not necessarily reflect those of the MIT Industrial Performance Center or the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Diffusion of Academic R&D Capabilities as an Industrial Innovation Policy? – The Development of Israel’s IT Industry Dan Breznitz Industrial Performance Center – MIT Media Lab Europe – Dublin, Ireland MIT Department of Political Science E38-105 292 Main Street, Cambridge, MA, 02139 Telephone: 617-2530144, Fax: 617- 2537570, email: [email protected] Abstract: In the last decade, three countries have figured prominently as cases of late-late developing countries that achieved worldwide success with their Information Technology (IT) industries: India, Ireland, and Israel. This paper focuses on the Israeli case and argues that unlike India and Ireland, Israel’s competitive advantage in the IT industries, is in Research and Development (R&D). The paper’s main arguments are that (a) the declared aim of Israel’s industrial policy has been to develop exactly such a system of innovation we see in Israel today; (b) however, these policies, focused on diffusion and not on creation of capabilities, were successful only because of the existence of an already sophisticated and extensive R&D capability in the universities – markedly different from other NICs. Looking at the present the paper concludes that the same operational model that led Israel’s IT industry to success might now be undermining its future growth. Keywords: Industrial transformation and development, Innovative capabilities’ diffusion, systems of innovation, Information technologies, Science and technology policies JEL – codes: L5, L6, L8, O0 The author would like to thank Suzanne Berger and Richard Lester for their comments and encouragement; Dan Peled and Mary O’Sullivan for reading and commenting on earlier drafts; Glorianna Davenport for her continuing support and encouragement; Richard Samuels and Michael Piore for their constant help; Brendan Touhy, Brian Caulfield, Sean O’Sullivan, and Cathal Friel for going over and above the call of duty in Ireland; and Orna Berry, Jon Medved, Ed Malvaski, and Shlomo Caine for doing the same in Israel. Earlier versions of this paper were presented in the DRUID 2003 conference and, What do we Know About Innovation: a Conference in the honor of Keith Pavitt at SPRU November 2003. Various ideas were presented at the International Workshop on Software in Emerging Countries in the Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pisa, Italy, the Software Industry Center at Carnegie-Mellon University, and at the weekly seminar of MIT’s Industrial Performance Center. The author would like to thank the participants for help and comments, especially to Ashish Arora, Stephen Klepper, Alfonso Gambardella, and Manuel Trajtenberg. As always, discussions with Gil Avnimelech and Morris Tuebal were source for many ideas; Gil also supplied superb research assistantship. The research is supported by a Sloan Foundation graduate fellowship; the STE program of the Neaman Institute in the Technion in Israel; the SSRC program on the Corporation as a Social Institution through grant given by the Sloan Foundation; the MacArthur Foundation, through two grants given by the Center for International Studies at MIT; MIT - Industrial Performance Center; and MediaLabEurope. All mistakes are solely the author’s. 4 Introduction In the last decade, three countries have figured prominently as cases of late-late developing countries that achieved worldwide success with their Information Technology (IT) industries: India, Ireland, and Israel. This paper focuses on the Israeli case and argues that, unlike India and Ireland, Israel’s competitive advantage in the IT industries is in Research and Development (R&D).1 This competitive advantage in R&D exists in all IT industrial sectors and life sciences and propelled the Israeli high-technology industry to success first in hardware and then in software. The argument of this paper is that this R&D advantage, historically emanating from Israel’s academic research complex, is apparent throughout the Israeli system of innovation and in all stages of technological research. The paper contends that after the early success of defense-related R&D efforts proved the viability of this knowledge, the existence of this academic technological R&D knowledge has allowed Israel to successfully utilize market-failure-focused industry-wide S&T industrial polices. Those policies have sought the diffusion of these capabilities throughout the industrial sector since in the late 1960s. Therefore, the paper’s main arguments are that (a) the declared aim of Israel’s industrial policy has been to develop exactly such a system of innovation that we see in Israel today; (b) these policies, focused on diffusion and not on creation of capabilities, were successful only because of the existence of an already sophisticated and extensive R&D capability in the universities; a marked difference with the histories of other Newly 1 For analysis of the Indian industry, see Arora et al. 2001a; Arora and Athreye 2002; Arora et al. 2001b; Patibandla and Petersen 2002; for analysis of the Irish industry, see Arora et al. 2001b; Breznitz 2002; O'Gorman et al. 1997; O'Riain 1997a; O'Riain 1997b; O'Riain 1999; O'Riain 2000. 5 Industrialized Countries. Hence, the Israeli innovation system, while not directly built by these state efforts, was nonetheless greatly assisted in its development by the state.2 This paper analyzes and compares the development of the Israeli IT industry following the arguments of the National Innovation System (NIS) literature (Lundvall 1992; Nelson 1993). The NIS literature offers us two interrelated insights in regard to the construction of national industry analysis: (1) Institutional – different kinds of informal and formal constraints construct different sets of incentives that influence innovative activities. These institutions also influence the way that new technologies are diffused throughout any given industrial system, and define that system’s specific R&D and technological paradigms (Dosi 1982). Consequently, the frequency of the creation of new generations of products that are developed using the latest technology. (2) The best way to analyze these sets of incentives is at the national level, i.e. the distinct relations between actors in the business, finance, state, and educational arenas at the national level best explain the level of innovation throughout the industry and throughout the nation in question(Zysman 1994; Zysman 1996).3 Accordingly, the analysis in this paper focuses on the national perspective, and also highlights the role of local market demand for IT and defense R&D in propelling and 2 Most of the literature about late developers, such as South Korea and Taiwan, emphasis the key role of technology transfer and catching-up in their industrial development history, with the state playing a critical role as facilitator and banker of both, as well as being the main vehicle of technology transfer in Taiwan through the creation of the Industrial Technology Research Institution – ITRI. This is an almost opposite development path to the one this paper argues Israel had utilized. For more about Korea and Taiwan, see Amsden 1989; Amsden 2001; Amsden and Chu 2003; Breznitz Forthcoming; Cheng 1990; Fields 1997; Fuller et al. 2003; Gold 1986; Hong 1997; Park 2000; Wade 1990. 3 Indeed some writers using the system of innovation approach argue that these systems should be analyzed at different levels, such as the industrial sectors or the region (Braczyk et al. 1998; Breschi and Malerba 1997; Carlsson et al. 2002; Hollingsworth et al. 1994; Kitschelt 1991; Saxenian 1994). However, as the subject of this paper is a specific industry and as the state of Israel, with its small size in land and population, is smaller than some of the regions analyzed by those writers, there is no real disagreement with our analysis. 6 enabling the development of civilian R&D capabilities. The analysis for this paper was supplemented with 240 interviews conducted with founders of IT companies, VCs, heads of the national and industrial development agencies, civil servants, and academics. These were conducted