The Social and Employment Situation in Malta

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Social and Employment Situation in Malta DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT A: ECONOMIC AND SCIENTIFIC POLICY The Social and Employment Situation in Malta STUDY Abstract This document was provided by Policy Department A at the request of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs. It gives an overview of the social and employment situation in Malta with a focus on indicators including social assistance and pension systems, social and employment legislation and policy, and about the inflow and integration of refugees, including tabulated data on these key topics. IP/A/IP/A/EMPL/FWC/2013-021 October 2016 PE 587.323 EN This document was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Employment and Social Affairs AUTHOR(S) Mario VASSALLO, University of Malta RESPONSIBLE ADMINISTRATOR Stefan SCHULZ EDITORIAL ASSISTANT Irene VERNACOTOLA LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN ABOUT THE EDITOR Policy departments provide in-house and external expertise to support EP committees and other parliamentary bodies in shaping legislation and exercising democratic scrutiny over EU internal policies. To contact Policy Department A or to subscribe to its newsletter please write to: Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy European Parliament B-1047 Brussels E-mail: [email protected] Manuscript completed in October 2016 © European Union, 2016 This document is available on the internet at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/studies DISCLAIMER The opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the publisher is given prior notice and sent a copy. The social and employment situation in Malta CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 4 LIST OF FIGURES 5 LIST OF TABLES 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 1. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS 9 1.1. The Maltese economy 9 1.2. Employment and unemployment in Malta 10 1.2.1. Long-standing issues 12 1.3. Social well-being 14 1.3.1. Social transfers 18 2. OVERVIEW OF SOCIAL AND EMPLOYMENT LEGISLATION AND POLICY 2.1. Legislation and policy measures aiming to reduce youth unemployment and 23 long-term unemployment 2.1.1. Youth unemployment 23 2.2. Legislation and policy measures to improve inclusion of most deprived groups 25 2.3. Implementation of the European Social Fund (ESF) and the Fund for European Aid to the Most Deprived (FEAD). 26 2.3.1. European Social Fund (ESF) 26 2.3.2. Fund for European Aid to the Most Deprived (FEAD) 26 3. INFLOW AND INTEGRATION OF REFUGEES 28 3.1. Immigration inflows 28 3.2. Integration policy 29 3.3. Current challenges 29 3.3.1. Medical care for migrants 29 3.3.2. Migrants and childcare 29 3.3.3. Public debate 29 REFERENCES 31 ANNEX 1 34 ANNEX 2 35 PE 587.323 3 Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AROP At risk of poverty ESF European Social Fund EU European Union FEAD Fund for European Aid to the Most Deprived FES Foundation for Educational Services LTU Long-term unemployment NEET Not in Employment, Education or Training NGO Non-governmental Organisation NMW National Minimum Wage NSO National Statistics Office SILC Statistical survey on income and living conditions SMD Severe Material Deprivation JRS Jesuit Refugee Service - Malta 4 PE 587.323 The social and employment situation in Malta LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Unemployment trends in Malta July 2013 – July 2016 9 Figure 2: Malta Youth Unemployment Rate 2015-2016 23 Figure 3: Origin of asylum seekers in Malta (January - August 2016) 28 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: The Maltese Economy 2011-2015 9 Table 2: Labour Statistics – Malta 11 Table 3.1: At risk of poverty and social exclusion: Percentage of total population 14 Table 3.2: At risk of poverty and social exclusion: Percentage of total male population 15 Table 3.3: At risk of poverty and social exclusion: Percentage of total female population 15 Table 3.4: At risk of poverty and social exclusion: Percentage of total population aged less than 16 15 Table 3.5: At risk of poverty and social exclusion: Percentage of total population aged 65 years and older 16 Table 4.1: Severe Material Deprivation rate for the 'Economic strain' and 'Durables' dimensions: Percentage of total population 16 Table 4.2: Severe Material Deprivation rate for the 'Economic strain' and 'Durables' dimensions: Percentage of population aged less than 16 years 16 Table 4.3: Severe Material Deprivation rate for the 'Economic strain' and 'Durables' dimensions: Percentage of population aged 65 years and older 16 Table 5.1: At-risk-of-poverty rate before social transfers (pensions excluded from social transfers) by household type: Total 18 Table 5.2: At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers): Total 18 Table 6.1: At-risk-of-poverty rate before social transfers (pensions excluded from social transfers) by household type: Single Person 19 Table 6.2: At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers): Single Person 19 Table 7.1: At-risk-of-poverty rate before social transfers (pensions excluded from social transfers) by household type: One adult 65 years or over 19 Table 7.2: At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers): One adult 65 years or over 20 Table 8.1: At-risk-of-poverty rate before social transfers (pensions excluded from social transfers) by household type: Single person with dependent children 20 Table 8.2: At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers): Single person with dependent children 20 Table 9.1: At-risk-of-poverty rate before social transfers (pensions excluded from social transfers) by household type: Households with dependent children 21 Table 9.2: At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers): Households with dependent children 21 PE 587.323 5 Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy Table 10: Malta Youth Guarantee Implementation Plan: Summary of Initiatives 24 Table 11: Beneficiaries of the FEAD Programme – April 2016Error! Bookmark not defined.27 6 PE 587.323 The social and employment situation in Malta EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • The Maltese economy is currently going through a very positive period, and growing very fast as a result of a combination of factors, ranging from domestic consumption to foreign investment. o Unemployment has declined substantially and foreign workers from a number of EU states and third countries are settling in Malta in view of the employment opportunities available. o Migration from third countries, particularly from the sub-Sahara region, has dwindled as ‘boat’ people prefer to seek refuge in mainland Europe rather than stop in Malta. However, Malta is currently experiencing an influx of refugees from places like Syria, who are escaping the difficult situation in their country. • Youth unemployment has also registered a decline, and in this area Malta is doing better than EU28. This is essentially the fruit of a policy to ensure that school leavers have the necessary skills to take up employment. Problems persist since school leavers are not always equipped with the right skills for gainful employment and early school leaving remains a major concern. • In Malta one does not witness poverty on the streets, but it does exist. In recent years, major efforts have been undertaken to reduce both the at-risk-of-poverty levels and the material deprivation levels, with an element of success. The two most at-risk groups are single mothers and the elderly. o A number of initiatives to assist the first group to move into the economy, primarily through free childcare for those working or undergoing training, are bearing positive results. o Similarly the very recent changes in the minimum state pensions have pushed many up the scale rather than further down, especially as the cost of rents increases. • In this sphere the role of transfer payments cannot be underestimated: many Maltese have come to depend on them, and it is hoped that there will never be any need to reduce them since, as an ex-Prime Minister recently commented, one has to be wary of their eventually becoming too heavy a burden to carry. o Even so, pensions remain low, and although a contributory ‘two-thirds’ pension scheme exists, in reality the two-thirds label is a fiction since the pension is capped at a very low level. o In view of this, an effort is being made to encourage people in the private sector to continue working beyond the official retirement age. o Paradoxically these incentives are denied to workers in government service or to those working in institutions that have a government interest. • Malta has benefited substantially from EU funds and sizable amounts have been dedicated to projects aiming to improve skills and benefit disadvantaged persons. The Maltese have participated very actively in projects and one can easily see that in various areas ESF funds have had positive effects. • The elderly in particular are being offered support from EU funds to remain in the community rather than retire to a home through a special project in which the government part-pays for the services of a qualified live-in carer. PE 587.323 7 Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy o The FEAD fund has also been tapped. Its implementation was delayed for a number of years, and the criteria on which it was to be implemented were questioned. o It has now been deployed and benefits that layer of Maltese society who are suffering from material deprivation, particularly families with young children and the elderly who are unable to cope on their own.
Recommended publications
  • EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 8.10.2019 COM(2019)
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 8.10.2019 COM(2019) 463 final REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL 2019 report on the economic and social situation of Gozo (Malta) EN EN 2019 REPORT ON THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL SITUATION OF GOZO (MALTA) Without prejudice to the ongoing negotiations on the Multiannual Financial Framework for the period 2021-2027, and in accordance with Declaration 36 on the island region of Gozo annexed to the Treaty of Accession of Malta, the Government of Malta requested in February 2019 the Commission to report to the Council on the economic and social situation of Gozo and, in particular, on the disparities of the social and economic development levels between Gozo and Malta and to propose appropriate measures, to enable the further integration of Gozo within the internal market. This report assesses the state of development of Gozo and the evolution of disparities within Malta. It provides an assessment by reviewing recent trends on a series of dimensions and indicators relevant for the development of Gozo, i.e. demography and labour market, structure of the economy and economic growth, geography and accessibility. The paper also provides a comparison of Gozo with the rest of Malta and with other European regions. Finally, it analyses how Cohesion policy addresses the development needs of Gozo. This report uses regional statistics produced by Eurostat and by the Maltese Statistical Office. 1. ANALYSIS OF THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL SITUATION IN GOZO 1.1. Geography and land use Gozo is the second most important island of the Maltese archipelago in terms of surface and population.
    [Show full text]
  • Socioeconomic Status and Its Impact on the Prevalence of Severe ADHD in the Maltese Islands
    OriginalEditorial OrgOdRe Article Socioeconomic status and its impact on the prevalence of severe ADHD in the Maltese Islands Christopher Rolé, Nigel Camilleri, Rachel Taylor-East, Neville Calleja Abstract The main aim of this study was to assess Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder whether higher prevalence rates of ADHD were (ADHD) is a common disorder which presents in present in the districts, which are classically childhood. The core symptoms include; associated with a low socioeconomic status. All hyperactivity, impulsivity and reduced attention. If persons aged 0 to 18 years attending the left untreated this may possibly lead to various governmental clinics, having a documented impairments of function in other areas of one’s life, diagnosis of severe ADHD and therefore being such as lack of educational attainment, increased prescribed pharmacotherapy were identified and risk of accident-prone behaviour, substance misuse included in this study. Nine young people were and antisocial behaviours. Although the exact living in institutional care and were therefore aetiology is still not fully understood, various excluded from statistical analysis since this would studies have demonstrated the presence of both a skew that data in this study. A significant difference genetic and an environmental component. ADHD is (p<0.0001) in the point prevalence of ADHD highly hereditable, demonstrating a strong genetic between the six Malta districts was found, with component (0.75). Furthermore, increased rates of higher rates of ADHD occurring in the harbour ADHD have been linked with a low socioeconomic districts. Though not statistically significant, a status. positive correlation was demonstrated between the The islands of Malta have traditionally been ADHD prevalence and a number of socioeconomic divided for statistical purposes into 6 districts, with variables, these included; the rate of smoking certain districts more often being associated with (p=0.111), number of people classified as at-risk-of- low socioeconomic demographics.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 European Elections the Weight of the Electorates Compared to the Electoral Weight of the Parliamentary Groups
    2019 European Elections The weight of the electorates compared to the electoral weight of the parliamentary groups Guillemette Lano Raphaël Grelon With the assistance of Victor Delage and Dominique Reynié July 2019 2019 European Elections. The weight of the electorates | Fondation pour l’innovation politique I. DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN THE WEIGHT OF ELECTORATES AND THE ELECTORAL WEIGHT OF PARLIAMENTARY GROUPS The Fondation pour l’innovation politique wished to reflect on the European elections in May 2019 by assessing the weight of electorates across the European constituency independently of the electoral weight represented by the parliamentary groups comprised post-election. For example, we have reconstructed a right-wing Eurosceptic electorate by aggregating the votes in favour of right-wing national lists whose discourses are hostile to the European Union. In this case, for instance, this methodology has led us to assign those who voted for Fidesz not to the European People’s Party (EPP) group but rather to an electorate which we describe as the “populist right and extreme right” in which we also include those who voted for the Italian Lega, the French National Rally, the Austrian FPÖ and the Sweden Democrats. Likewise, Slovak SMER voters were detached from the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D) Group and instead categorised as part of an electorate which we describe as the “populist left and extreme left”. A. The data collected The electoral results were collected list by list, country by country 1, from the websites of the national parliaments and governments of each of the States of the Union. We then aggregated these data at the European level, thus obtaining: – the number of individuals registered on the electoral lists on the date of the elections, or the registered voters; – the number of votes, or the voters; – the number of valid votes in favour of each of the lists, or the votes cast; – the number of invalid votes, or the blank or invalid votes.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Populism in Europe
    2018 State of Populism in Europe The past few years have seen a surge in the public support of populist, Eurosceptical and radical parties throughout almost the entire European Union. In several countries, their popularity matches or even exceeds the level of public support of the centre-left. Even though the centre-left parties, think tanks and researchers are aware of this challenge, there is still more OF POPULISM IN EUROPE – 2018 STATE that could be done in this fi eld. There is occasional research on individual populist parties in some countries, but there is no regular overview – updated every year – how the popularity of populist parties changes in the EU Member States, where new parties appear and old ones disappear. That is the reason why FEPS and Policy Solutions have launched this series of yearbooks, entitled “State of Populism in Europe”. *** FEPS is the fi rst progressive political foundation established at the European level. Created in 2007 and co-fi nanced by the European Parliament, it aims at establishing an intellectual crossroad between social democracy and the European project. Policy Solutions is a progressive political research institute based in Budapest. Among the pre-eminent areas of its research are the investigation of how the quality of democracy evolves, the analysis of factors driving populism, and election research. Contributors : Tamás BOROS, Maria FREITAS, Gergely LAKI, Ernst STETTER STATE OF POPULISM Tamás BOROS IN EUROPE Maria FREITAS • This book is edited by FEPS with the fi nancial support of the European
    [Show full text]
  • Review of European and National Election Results 2014-2019 Mid-Term January 2017
    Review of European and National Election Results 2014-2019 Mid-term January 2017 STUDY Public Opinion Monitoring Series Directorate-General for Communication Published by EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service Author: Jacques Nancy, Public Opinion Monitoring Unit PE 599.242 Directorate-General for Communication Public Opinion Monitoring Unit REVIEW EE2014 Edition Spéciale Mi-Législature Special Edition on Mid-term Legislature LES ÉLECTIONS EUROPÉENNES ET NATIONALES EN CHIFFRES EUROPEAN AND NATIONAL ELECTIONS RESULTS TABLES Mise à jour – 20 janvier 2017 Update – 20th January 2017 8éme Législature 8th Parliamentary Term DANS CETTE EDITION Page IN THIS EDITION Page EDITORIAL11 EDITORIAL I.COMPOSITION DU PARLEMENT EUROPÉEN 6 I. COMPOSITION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 6 A.REPARTITION DES SIEGES 7 A.DISTRIBUTION OF SEATS 7 B.COMPOSITION DU PARLEMENT 8 B.COMPOSITION OF THE PARLIAMENT 8 -9-9AU 01/07/2014 ON THE 01/07/2014 -10-10AU 20/01/2017 ON THE 20/01/2017 C.SESSIONS CONSTITUTIVES ET PARLEMENT 11 C.CONSTITUTIVE SESSIONS AND OUTGOING EP 11 SORTANT DEPUIS 1979 SINCE 1979 D.REPARTITION FEMMES - HOMMES 29 D.PROPORTION OF WOMEN AND MEN 29 AU 20/01/2017 ON 20/01/2017 -30-30PAR GROUPE POLITIQUE AU 20/01/2017 IN THE POLITICAL GROUPS ON 20/01/2017 ET DEPUIS 1979 AND SINCE 1979 E.PARLEMENTAIRES RÉÉLUS 33 E.RE-ELECTED MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT 33 II.NOMBRE DE PARTIS NATIONAUX AU PARLEMENT 35 II.NUMBER OF NATIONAL PARTIES IN THE EUROPEAN 35 EUROPEEN AU 20/01/2017 PARLIAMENT ON 20/01/2017 III.TAUX DE PARTICIPATION 37 III. TURNOUT 37 -38-38TAUX DE PARTICIPATION
    [Show full text]
  • Review of European and National Election Results Update: September 2019
    REVIEW OF EUROPEAN AND NATIONAL ELECTION RESULTS UPDATE: SEPTEMBER 2019 A Public Opinion Monitoring Publication REVIEW OF EUROPEAN AND NATIONAL ELECTION RESULTS UPDATE: SEPTEMBER 2019 Directorate-General for Communication Public Opinion Monitoring Unit May 2019 - PE 640.149 IMPRESSUM AUTHORS Philipp SCHULMEISTER, Head of Unit (Editor) Alice CHIESA, Marc FRIEDLI, Dimitra TSOULOU MALAKOUDI, Matthias BÜTTNER Special thanks to EP Liaison Offices and Members’ Administration Unit PRODUCTION Katarzyna ONISZK Manuscript completed in September 2019 Brussels, © European Union, 2019 Cover photo: © Andrey Kuzmin, Shutterstock.com ABOUT THE PUBLISHER This paper has been drawn up by the Public Opinion Monitoring Unit within the Directorate–General for Communication (DG COMM) of the European Parliament. To contact the Public Opinion Monitoring Unit please write to: [email protected] LINGUISTIC VERSION Original: EN DISCLAIMER This document is prepared for, and primarily addressed to, the Members and staff of the European Parliament to assist them in their parliamentary work. The content of the document is the sole responsibility of its author(s) and any opinions expressed herein should not be taken to represent an official position of the Parliament. TABLE OF CONTENTS EDITORIAL 1 1. COMPOSITION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 5 DISTRIBUTION OF SEATS OVERVIEW 1979 - 2019 6 COMPOSITION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LAST UPDATE (31/07/2019) 7 CONSTITUTIVE SESSION (02/07/2019) AND OUTGOING EP SINCE 1979 8 PROPORTION OF WOMEN AND MEN PROPORTION - LAST UPDATE 02/07/2019 28 PROPORTIONS IN POLITICAL GROUPS - LAST UPDATE 02/07/2019 29 PROPORTION OF WOMEN IN POLITICAL GROUPS - SINCE 1979 30 2. NUMBER OF NATIONAL PARTIES IN THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT CONSTITUTIVE SESSION 31 3.
    [Show full text]
  • COASTAL AREA MANAGEMENT in MALTA Note
    COASTAL AREA MANAGEMENT IN MALTA Note This document was prepared by the Priority Actions Programme Regional Activity Centre (PAP/RAC) of the Mediterranean Action Plan (MAP-UNEP). The authors of the document are Louis Vella, Christine M. Tanti and Avertano Rolé. Zeljka Skaricic contributed to its general revision and finalisation, and Viktor Popovic designed and prepared the document for printing. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the United Nations Environment Programme or the Mediterranean Action Plan concerning the legal status of any state, territory, city or area, or their authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this document do not necessarily represent the views of the United Nations Environment Programme. © 2005 Priority Actions Programme Regional Activity Centre, Split ISBN 953-6429-56-X This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part in any form of educational and non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. PAP would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this material as source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or any other commercial purposes whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the copyright holder. For bibliographic purposes this document may be cited as: PAP/RAC: Coastal Area Management in the Maltese Islands, Priority Actions Programme Regional Activity Centre, Split, 2005. TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Plates iv List of Figures iv List of Tables v List of Boxes v List of Acronyms vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS vii PREFACE ix EXECUTIVE SUMMARY xi CHAPTER I / Introduction 1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government White Paper and Interrelated Regions and Districts
    LOCAL GOVERNMENT WHITE PAPER AND INTERRELATED REGIONS AND DISTRICTS Perit Joseph Magro B.Sc.(Eng.)(Hons.), B.A.(Arch.) Update Note to the Addendum “Interrelated Regions and Districts for Malta and Gozo” Annexed to the Study Paper “Proposals For An Improved Malta Electoral System” This note proposes another solution of interrelated regions and districts, now based on the six regions as detailed in the Local Government White Paper. It also serves as a comparative study to the one put forward in the Addendum where a similar organizational structure of interrelated regions and districts for Malta and Gozo was proposed, with the districts also serving as electoral divisions. October 2018 LOCAL GOVERNMENT WHITE PAPER AND INTERRELATED REGIONS AND DISTRICTS Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 3 1.1 Reference to the Local Government White Paper 1.2 Reference to the Addendum 1.3 Main Objectives of This Update Note to the Addendum 1.4 Parameters Governing this Exercise 2. THE REGIONS AS ESTABLISHED IN THE WHITE PAPER ……………………………..…..………………………… 4 2.1 Maps of the Regions 3. ESTABLISHING THE DISTRICTS ……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 5 3.1 Hamlets 3.2 Numbering of Regions and Districts 4. COMPARATIVE CASE STUDIES …………………………………………….……………..………………………………….. 6 4.1 Proposed Organizational Structure and Registered Voter Changes 4.2 District Seat Value 4.3 Registered Voter Changes between October 2007 and April 2018 5. CONCLUSION ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 8 Appendix 1: Map of the (White Paper) Regions and Proposed Districts …..…..….………………….……… 9 Appendix 2: Map of the Existing Regions of Malta ……………………………………………………………….…… 10 Appendix 3: Map of the Regions as Proposed in the White Paper ………………………………………….…. 11 2 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Reference to the Local Government White Paper The Local Government White Paper, published on 19th October 2018, refers to the existing five Regions of Malta as established by Act No.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposals for an Improved Maltese Electoral System
    Study Paper PROPOSALS FOR AN IMPROVED MALTA ELECTORAL SYSTEM Perit Joseph Magro B.Sc.(Eng.) (Hons.), B.A.(Arch.) A Study Paper that analysis the results of all the twenty four General Elections held in Malta between 1921 and 2017 and proposes revisions to the current Single Transferable Vote System: - to make the electoral system fairer for all contesting candidates and political parties - to make the final result of the General Elections truly reflect the choices of the electorate April 2018 PROPOSALS FOR AN IMPROVED MALTA ELECTORAL SYSTEM Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................... 3 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Definitions of Terms used in the Document .................................................................................... 5 1.2 Background ...................................................................................................................................... 6 2. REGULATION OF THE REGISTERED VOTERS AND GENERAL ELECTION RESULTS ................................. 7 3. THE QUOTA IN EACH ELECTORAL DIVISION ....................................................................................... 10 3.1 The Current System ................................................................................................................... 10 3.2 The Proposed System ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ZA7581 European Parliament Election Study 2019, Voter Study
    ZA7581 European Parliament Election Study 2019, Voter Study Country Questionnaire Malta (English) QUESTIONNAIRE OF THE VOTER STUDY OF THE EUROPEAN ELECTIONS STUDY 2019 MALTA (ENGLISH) May, 2019 This questionnaire was prepared by the Planning Committee of the 2019 European Election Study Wouter van der Brug and Sara Hobolt (co-chairs), Sebastian Popa (treasurer) Hermann Schmitt, with input feedback from Eftichia Teperoglou Ilke Toygur, Claes de Vreese and Catherine de Vries 1 VALENCE ISSUES Q1 What do you think is the most important issue or problem facing Malta at the moment? ____________________________________________ ____________________________________________ ____________________________________________ 98 Don’t know 99 No answer Q2 Which political party do you think would be best at dealing with this problem? 1 Labour Party 2 Nationalist Party 3 Democratic Alternative 4 Democratic Party 5 Imperium Europa 10 Other party 11 none of the parties 98 Don’t Know 99 No answer Q3 On the whole, how satisfied are you with the way democracy works in Malta ? Are you 1 Very satisfied 2 Fairly satisfied 3 Not very satisfied 4 Not at all satisfied 98 Don’t know 99 No answer Q4 All in all again, are you very satisfied, fairly satisfied, not very satisfied or not at all satisfied with the way democracy works in the European Union? 1 Very satisfied 2 Fairly satisfied 3 Not very satisfied 4 not at all satisfied 98 Don’t know 99 No answer Q5 Let us now come back to Malta. Do you approve or disapprove the government's record to date? 1 Approve 2 Disapprove 98 Don’t know 99 No answer 2 Q6 The European Parliament elections were held on the 25 May.
    [Show full text]
  • RRH: Rural and Remote Health Article: 5666
    Rural and Remote Health rrh.org.au James Cook University ISSN 1445-6354 ORIGINAL RESEARCH AUTHORS Tania Cardona1 MD (Melit), MSc, Specialist Trainee in Public Health Medicine * Neville Calleja2 MD, MSc (Lond), MSc PhD (Open), MFPH, C.Stat, C.Sci, FRSPH, DLSHTM, Public Health Consultant Glorianne Pullicino3 MSc (Public Health Medicine), MRCGP (INT), MMCFD, Assistant Lecturer CORRESPONDENCE *Dr Tania Cardona [email protected] AFFILIATIONS 1, 3 Department of Family Medicine, University of Malta, Tal-Qroqq, Msida, MSD 2080, Malta 2 Directorate for Information and Research, 95, Telgha ta’ Gwardamangia, Tal-Pieta, PTA 1313, Malta PUBLISHED 19 November 2020 Volume 20 Issue 4 HISTORY RECEIVED: 28 September 2019 REVISED: 18 August 2020 ACCEPTED: 15 September 2020 CITATION Cardona T, Calleja N, Pullicino G. Urban–suburban differences in the demographics and clinical profiles of type 2 diabetic patients attending primary healthcare centres in Malta. Rural and Remote Health 2020; 20: 5666. https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH5666 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence ABSTRACT: Introduction: Social factors might bring about health inequities. Results: The logistic regression model predicting the likelihood of Vulnerable population groups, including those suffering from non- different factors occurring with suburban patients with diabetes as communicable diseases such as type 2 diabetes and depression, opposed to those residing in urban areas contained five might be more prone to suffering the effects of such inequities. independent variables (severity of depression, monthly income, This study aimed to identify patients with type 2 diabetes with blood capillary glucose readings, weight and nationality). The full depression in a primary care setting, with the objective of model containing all predictors was statistically significant, c2 (5, describing health inequities among urban and suburban dwellers.
    [Show full text]
  • Of European and National Election Results Update: September 2018
    REVIEW OF EUROPEAN AND NATIONAL ELECTION RESULTS UPDATE: SEPTEMBER 2018 A Public Opinion Monitoring Publication REVIEW OF EUROPEAN AND NATIONAL ELECTION RESULTS UPDATE: SEPTEMBER 2018 Directorate-General for Communication Public Opinion Monitoring Unit September 2018 - PE 625.195 TABLE OF CONTENTS EDITORIAL 1 1. COMPOSITION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 5 DISTRIBUTION OF SEATS EE2019 6 OVERVIEW 1979 - 2014 7 COMPOSITION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LAST UPDATE (10/09/2018) 8 CONSTITUTIVE SESSION (01/07/2014) 9 PROPORTION OF WOMEN AND MEN PROPORTION - LAST UPDATE 10 PROPORTIONS IN POLITICAL GROUPS - LAST UPDATE 11 PROPORTION OF WOMEN IN POLITICAL GROUPS - SINCE 1979 12 2. NUMBER OF NATIONAL PARTIES IN THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 13 3. TURNOUT: EE2014 15 TURNOUT IN THE LAST EUROPEAN AND NATIONAL ELECTIONS 16 TURNOUT IN THE EE2014 18 TURNOUT COMPARISON: 2009 (2013) - 2014 19 TURNOUT IN THE EE2014 - BREAKDOWN BY GENDER 20 TURNOUT IN THE EE2014 - BREAKDOWN BY AGE 21 TURNOUT OVERVIEW SINCE 1979 22 TURNOUT OVERVIEW SINCE 1979 - BY MEMBER STATE 23 4. NATIONAL RESULTS BY MEMBER STATE 27-301 GOVERNMENTS AND OPPOSITION IN MEMBER STATES 28 COMPOSITION OF THE EP: 2014 AND LATEST UPDATE POLITICAL PARTIES IN THE EP MEMBERS OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT - BY MEMBER STATE EE2014 TOTAL RESULTS EE2014 ELECTORAL LISTS - BY MEMBER STATE RESULTS OF TWO LAST NATIONAL ELECTIONS AND THE EE 2014 DIRECT PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS SOURCES EDITORIAL First published in November 2014, the Review of European and National Elections offers a comprehensive, detailed and up-to-date overview on the composition of the European Parliament, national elections in all EU Member States as well as a historical overview on the now nearly forty years of direct elections to the European Parliament since 1979.
    [Show full text]