DOCSLIB.ORG

ZA7581 European Parliament Election Study 2019, Voter Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ZA7581 European Parliament Election Study 2019, Voter Study Country Questionnaire Malta (English) QUESTIONNAIRE OF THE VOTER STUDY OF THE EUROPEAN ELECTIONS STUDY 2019 MALTA (ENGLISH) May, 2019 This questionnaire was prepared by the Planning Committee of the 2019 European Election Study Wouter van der Brug and Sara Hobolt (co-chairs), Sebastian Popa (treasurer) Hermann Schmitt, with input feedback from Eftichia Teperoglou Ilke Toygur, Claes de Vreese and Catherine de Vries 1 VALENCE ISSUES Q1 What do you think is the most important issue or problem facing Malta at the moment? ____________________________________________ ____________________________________________ ____________________________________________ 98 Don’t know 99 No answer Q2 Which political party do you think would be best at dealing with this problem? 1 Labour Party 2 Nationalist Party 3 Democratic Alternative 4 Democratic Party 5 Imperium Europa 10 Other party 11 none of the parties 98 Don’t Know 99 No answer Q3 On the whole, how satisfied are you with the way democracy works in Malta ? Are you 1 Very satisfied 2 Fairly satisfied 3 Not very satisfied 4 Not at all satisfied 98 Don’t know 99 No answer Q4 All in all again, are you very satisfied, fairly satisfied, not very satisfied or not at all satisfied with the way democracy works in the European Union? 1 Very satisfied 2 Fairly satisfied 3 Not very satisfied 4 not at all satisfied 98 Don’t know 99 No answer Q5 Let us now come back to Malta. Do you approve or disapprove the government's record to date? 1 Approve 2 Disapprove 98 Don’t know 99 No answer 2 Q6 The European Parliament elections were held on the 25 May. For one reason or another, some people in Malta did not vote in these elections. Did you vote in the recent European Parliament elections? 1 yes, voted 2 No, did not vote 98 Don’t know go to Q8 99 No answer Q7 Which party did you vote for in the European Parliament elections? 1 Labour Party 2 Nationalist Party 3 Democratic Alternative 4 Democratic Party 5 Imperium Europa 90 Other party 96 Did vote blanc or nil 98 Do not remember 99 No answer Q8 How closely did you follow the campaign ahead of the European Parliament elections in the media or on social media? Please indicate using any number on an 11-point-scale. On this scale, where 0 means "not at all" and 10 means "very closely" which number best describes your situation? 0 Not at all 1 ... 9 10 Very closely 97 Refused 98 Don know 99 No answer Q9 Which party did you vote for at the 2017 Maltese general election 1 Labour Party 2 National Force ( Nationalist Party + Democratic Party) 3 Maltese Patriots Movement 4 Democratic Alternative 90 Other party 96 Did vote blanc or nil 97 Did not vote 98 Do not remember 99 No answer 3 Q10 We have a number of parties in Malta each of which would like to get your vote. How probable is it that you will ever vote for the following parties? Please answer on a scale where 0 means "not at all probable" and 10 means "very probable". If you think of Labour Party?: what mark out of ten best describes how probable it is that you will ever vote for the Labour Party? [CONTINUE FOR ALL Parties IN THE LIST BELLOW] 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Refusal Don’t know Not at Very (spontaneous) the party all proba- (spontaneous) probable ble Labour Party 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 97 98 Nationalist 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 97 98 Party Democratic 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 97 98 Alternative Democratic 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 97 98 Party Imperium 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 97 98 Europa Q11 In political matters people talk of "the left" and "the right". What is your position? Please indicate your views using any number on an 11-point-scale. On this scale, where 0 means "left" and 10 means "right," which number best describes your position? 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Refusal Don’t Left Right (spontaneous ) know 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 97 99 Q13 And about where would you place the following political parties on this scale? How about the Labour Party? Which number from 0 to 10, where '0' means "left" and '10' means "right" best describes this party? [CONTINUE FOR ALL Parties IN THE LIST BELLOW] 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Refusal Don’t know Don’t know Left Right (spontaneous) the party how to place (spontaneous) the party (spontaneous) Labour 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 97 98 99 Party Nationalist 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 97 98 99 Party Democratic 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 97 98 99 Alternative Democratic 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 97 98 99 Party Imperium 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 97 98 99 Europa Labour 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 97 98 99 Party Nationalist 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 97 98 99 Party 4 Q14 Now I would like you to tell me your views on various issues. For each issue, we will present you with two opposite statements and we will ask your opinion about these two statements. We would like to ask you to position yourself on a scale from 0 to 10, where '0' means that you "fully agree with the statement at the top" and '10' means that you "fully agree with the statement at the bottom". Then if your views are somewhere in between, you can choose any number that describes your position best. Q14.1 What do you think of state regulation and control of the economy: 0 You fully oppose a restrictive policy on immigration of Malta 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 You fully oppose state intervention in the economy of Malta 97 Refused 98 Don’t know 99 No answer Q14.2 Redistribution of wealth: 0 You fully favour redistribution from the rich to the poor in Malta 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8. 9 10 You fully oppose redistribution of wealth from the rich to the poor in Malta 97 Refused 98 Don’t know 99 No answer Q14.3 Same-sex marriage: 0 You fully favour same sex marriage 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 You fully oppose same sex marriages 97 Refused 98 Don’t know 99 No answer 5 Q14.4 Civil liberties: 0 You fully support privacy rights even if they hinder efforts to combat crime 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 You fully support restricting privacy rights in order to combat crime 97 Refused 98 Don’t know 99 No answer Q14.5 Immigration: 0 You fully favour a restrictive policy on immigration 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 You fully oppose a restrictive policy on immigration 97 Refused 98 Don’t know 99 No answer Q14.6 Environment: 0 Environmental protection should take priority even at the cost of economic growth 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Economic growth should take priority even at the cost of environmental protection 97 Refused 98 Don’t know 99 No answer 6 Q15 Imagine there were a referendum in Malta tomorrow about the membership of the European Union. Would you vote for Malta to remain a member of the European Union or to leave the European Union”. 1 Remain a member of the EU 2 Leave the EU 3 (Would submit a blank ballot paper) 4 (Would spoil the ballot paper) 5 (Would not vote) 6 (Not eligible to vote) Q16 How important is it for you to live in a country that is governed democratically? On this scale where 1 means it is “not at all important” and 10 means “absolutely important” what position would you choose?: <Source: ESS round 6 questionB18d> 1 Not at all important 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Absolutely important 98 Don’t know 99 No answer Q17 To what extent do you agree or disagree with each of the following statements? Fully Agree Neither Disa Fully DK agree agree or gree disag disagree ree 1 Independent judges should be able to 1 2 3 4 5 98 overrule the decisions of democratically elected government if the decisions violate the rights of individuals or groups in society. 2 Governments should be allowed to prohibit 1 2 3 4 5 98 a peaceful protest if many citizens will be offended by its slogans. 3 In order to secure the independence of the 1 2 3 4 5 98 public media, elected politicians should have no influence on the content of their broadcasting. 4 Having a strong leader in government is 1 2 3 4 5 98 good for Malta even if the leader bends the rules to get things done. 5 The people, and not politicians, should 1 2 3 4 5 98 make our most important policy decisions. 7 Q18 For each of the following statements, please tell me to what extent it corresponds or not to your attitude or opinion.
Recommended publications
  • 2019 European Elections the Weight of the Electorates Compared to the Electoral Weight of the Parliamentary Groups

    2019 European Elections the Weight of the Electorates Compared to the Electoral Weight of the Parliamentary Groups

    2019 European Elections The weight of the electorates compared to the electoral weight of the parliamentary groups Guillemette Lano Raphaël Grelon With the assistance of Victor Delage and Dominique Reynié July 2019 2019 European Elections. The weight of the electorates | Fondation pour l’innovation politique I. DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN THE WEIGHT OF ELECTORATES AND THE ELECTORAL WEIGHT OF PARLIAMENTARY GROUPS The Fondation pour l’innovation politique wished to reflect on the European elections in May 2019 by assessing the weight of electorates across the European constituency independently of the electoral weight represented by the parliamentary groups comprised post-election. For example, we have reconstructed a right-wing Eurosceptic electorate by aggregating the votes in favour of right-wing national lists whose discourses are hostile to the European Union. In this case, for instance, this methodology has led us to assign those who voted for Fidesz not to the European People’s Party (EPP) group but rather to an electorate which we describe as the “populist right and extreme right” in which we also include those who voted for the Italian Lega, the French National Rally, the Austrian FPÖ and the Sweden Democrats. Likewise, Slovak SMER voters were detached from the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D) Group and instead categorised as part of an electorate which we describe as the “populist left and extreme left”. A. The data collected The electoral results were collected list by list, country by country 1, from the websites of the national parliaments and governments of each of the States of the Union. We then aggregated these data at the European level, thus obtaining: – the number of individuals registered on the electoral lists on the date of the elections, or the registered voters; – the number of votes, or the voters; – the number of valid votes in favour of each of the lists, or the votes cast; – the number of invalid votes, or the blank or invalid votes.
  • ("DSCC") Files This Complaint Seeking an Immediate Investigation by the 7

    ("DSCC") Files This Complaint Seeking an Immediate Investigation by the 7

    COMPLAINT BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION CBHMISSIOAl INTRODUCTXON - 1 The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee ("DSCC") 7-_. J _j. c files this complaint seeking an immediate investigation by the 7 c; a > Federal Election Commission into the illegal spending A* practices of the National Republican Senatorial Campaign Committee (WRSCIt). As the public record shows, and an investigation will confirm, the NRSC and a series of ostensibly nonprofit, nonpartisan groups have undertaken a significant and sustained effort to funnel "soft money101 into federal elections in violation of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended or "the Act"), 2 U.S.C. 5s 431 et seq., and the Federal Election Commission (peFECt)Regulations, 11 C.F.R. 85 100.1 & sea. 'The term "aoft money" as ueed in this Complaint means funds,that would not be lawful for use in connection with any federal election (e.g., corporate or labor organization treasury funds, contributions in excess of the relevant contribution limit for federal elections). THE FACTS IN TBIS CABE On November 24, 1992, the state of Georgia held a unique runoff election for the office of United States Senator. Georgia law provided for a runoff if no candidate in the regularly scheduled November 3 general election received in excess of 50 percent of the vote. The 1992 runoff in Georg a was a hotly contested race between the Democratic incumbent Wyche Fowler, and his Republican opponent, Paul Coverdell. The Republicans presented this election as a %ust-win81 election. Exhibit 1. The Republicans were so intent on victory that Senator Dole announced he was willing to give up his seat on the Senate Agriculture Committee for Coverdell, if necessary.
  • [Sample B: Approval/Signature Sheet]

    [Sample B: Approval/Signature Sheet]

    GENDER ISSUES, STRUCTURAL AND CULTURAL VIOLENCE (MALTA) by Bardia Bastin A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of George Mason University in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Conflict Analysis and Resolution Master of Arts Conflict Resolution and Mediterranean Security Committee: Chair of Committee l Graduate Program Coordinator Director, School for Conflict Analysis and Resolution Date: Idrt-r{ Fall Semester 2011 George Mason University Fairfax, VA University of Malta Valletta, Malta Gender Issues, Structural and Cultural Violence (Malta) A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science at George Mason University, and the degree of Master of Arts at the University of Malta By Bardia Bastin Bachelor of Arts George Mason University, 2010 Director: Dr. Omar Grech Mediterranean Academy of Diplomatic Studies Fall Semester 2011 George Mason University Fairfax, VA University of Malta Valletta, Malta Copyright: Bardia Bastin 2011 All Rights Reserved ii DEDICATION This is dedicated to my parents, Hamid and Fahimeh Bastin, as well as my brother Baback Bastin, and to my future wife and children. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thank you to my thesis chair, Professor Omar Grech, as well as my family as mentioned above. Also to Natalie Zarb for keeping me motivated throughout the program. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Chapter 1: Introduction .................................................................................................…1 Chapter 2: Overview of Violence
  • Download (515Kb)

    Download (515Kb)

    European Community No. 26/1984 July 10, 1984 Contact: Ella Krucoff (202) 862-9540 THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: 1984 ELECTION RESULTS :The newly elected European Parliament - the second to be chosen directly by European voters -- began its five-year term last month with an inaugural session in Strasbourg~ France. The Parliament elected Pierre Pflimlin, a French Christian Democrat, as its new president. Pflimlin, a parliamentarian since 1979, is a former Prime Minister of France and ex-mayor of Strasbourg. Be succeeds Pieter Dankert, a Dutch Socialist, who came in second in the presidential vote this time around. The new assembly quickly exercised one of its major powers -- final say over the European Community budget -- by blocking payment of a L983 budget rebate to the United Kingdom. The rebate had been approved by Community leaders as part of an overall plan to resolve the E.C.'s financial problems. The Parliament froze the rebate after the U.K. opposed a plan for covering a 1984 budget shortfall during a July Council of Ministers meeting. The issue will be discussed again in September by E.C. institutions. Garret FitzGerald, Prime Minister of Ireland, outlined for the Parliament the goals of Ireland's six-month presidency of the E.C. Council. Be urged the representatives to continue working for a more unified Europe in which "free movement of people and goods" is a reality, and he called for more "intensified common action" to fight unemployment. Be said European politicians must work to bolster the public's faith in the E.C., noting that budget problems and inter-governmental "wrangles" have overshadolted the Community's benefits.
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed

    ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed

    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
  • Framework Agreement Between the Swedish Social Democratic Party, the Moderate Party, the Swedish Green Party, the Centre Party and the Christian Democrats

    Framework Agreement Between the Swedish Social Democratic Party, the Moderate Party, the Swedish Green Party, the Centre Party and the Christian Democrats

    Framework agreement between the Swedish Social Democratic Party, the Moderate Party, the Swedish Green Party, the Centre Party and the Christian Democrats Pillars Sweden’s energy policy should build on the same three pillars as energy cooperation in the EU. The policy therefore aims to combine: • ecological sustainability • competitiveness • security of supply Sweden must have a robust electricity network with high security of supply and low environmental impact, and offer electricity at competitive prices. This creates a long- term perspective and clarity for actors in the market and helps generate new jobs and investment in Sweden. The energy policy is based on the fact that Sweden is closely linked to its neighbours in northern Europe, and aims to find joint solutions to challenges in the common electricity market. Targets By 2045, Sweden is to have no net emissions of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere and should thereafter achieve negative emissions. The target by 2040 is 100 per cent renewable electricity production. This is a target, not a deadline for banning nuclear power, nor does mean closing nuclear power plants through political decisions. An energy-efficiency target for the period 2020 to 2030 will be produced and adopted no later than 2017. Conditions on the Swedish electricity market Better conditions are needed for investments in renewable energy, energy technologies and energy efficiency. Development of the energy system should be based on a variety of large- and small-scale renewable production that is tailored to local and industrial needs. One major challenge is converting energy policy from focusing almost exclusively on the amount of energy delivered (TWh) to also ensuring sufficient output (MW).
  • State of Populism in Europe

    State of Populism in Europe

    2018 State of Populism in Europe The past few years have seen a surge in the public support of populist, Eurosceptical and radical parties throughout almost the entire European Union. In several countries, their popularity matches or even exceeds the level of public support of the centre-left. Even though the centre-left parties, think tanks and researchers are aware of this challenge, there is still more OF POPULISM IN EUROPE – 2018 STATE that could be done in this fi eld. There is occasional research on individual populist parties in some countries, but there is no regular overview – updated every year – how the popularity of populist parties changes in the EU Member States, where new parties appear and old ones disappear. That is the reason why FEPS and Policy Solutions have launched this series of yearbooks, entitled “State of Populism in Europe”. *** FEPS is the fi rst progressive political foundation established at the European level. Created in 2007 and co-fi nanced by the European Parliament, it aims at establishing an intellectual crossroad between social democracy and the European project. Policy Solutions is a progressive political research institute based in Budapest. Among the pre-eminent areas of its research are the investigation of how the quality of democracy evolves, the analysis of factors driving populism, and election research. Contributors : Tamás BOROS, Maria FREITAS, Gergely LAKI, Ernst STETTER STATE OF POPULISM Tamás BOROS IN EUROPE Maria FREITAS • This book is edited by FEPS with the fi nancial support of the European
  • Trainers Manual

    Trainers Manual

    Together in Malta – Trainers Manual 1 Table of Contents List of Acronyms 3 Introduction 4 Proposed tools for facilitators of civic orientation sessions 6 What is civic orientation? 6 The Training Cycle 6 The principles of adult learning 7 Creating a respectful and safe learning space 8 Ice-breakers and introductions 9 Living in Malta 15 General information 15 Geography and population 15 Political system 15 National symbols 16 Holidays 17 Arrival and stay in Malta 21 Entry conditions 21 The stay in the country 21 The issuance of a residence permit 21 Minors 23 Renewal of the residence permit 23 Change of residence permit 24 Personal documents 24 Long-term residence permit in the EU and the acquisition of Maltese citizenship 24 Long Term Residence Permit 24 Obtaining the Maltese citizenship 25 Health 26 Access to healthcare 26 The National Health system 26 What public health services are provided? 28 Maternal and child health 29 Pregnancy 29 Giving Birth 30 Required and recommended vaccinations 30 Contraception 31 Abortion and birth anonymously 31 Women’s health protection 32 Prevention and early detection of breast cancer 32 Sexually transmitted diseases 32 Anti violence centres 33 FGM - Female genital mutilation 34 School life and adult education 36 IOM Malta 1 De Vilhena Residence, Apt. 2, Trejqet il-Fosos, Floriana FRN 1182, Malta Tel: +356 2137 4613 • Fax: +356 2122 5168 • E-mail: [email protected] • Internet: http://www.iom.int 2 Malta’s education system 36 School Registration 37 Academic / School Calendar 38 Attendance Control 38
  • Electoral Processes in the Mediterranean

    Electoral Processes in the Mediterranean

    Electoral Processes Electoral processes in the Mediterranean This chapter provides information on jority party if it does not manage to Gorazd Drevensek the results of the presidential and leg- obtain an absolute majority in the (New Slovenia Christian Appendices islative elections held between July Chamber. People’s Party, Christian Democrat) 0.9 - 2002 and June 2003. Jure Jurèek Cekuta 0.5 - Parties % Seats Participation: 71.3 % (1st round); 65.2 % (2nd round). Monaco Nationalist Party (PN, conservative) 51.8 35 Legislative elections 2003 Malta Labour Party (MLP, social democrat) 47.5 30 9th February 2003 Bosnia and Herzegovina Med. Previous elections: 1st and 8th Februa- Democratic Alternative (AD, ecologist) 0.7 - ry 1998 Federal parliamentary republic that Parliamentary monarchy with unicam- Participation: 96.2 %. became independent from Yugoslavia eral legislative: the National Council. in 1991, and is formed by two enti- The twenty-four seats of the chamber ties: the Bosnia and Herzegovina Fed- Slovenia are elected for a five-year term; sixteen eration, known as the Croat-Muslim Presidential elections by simple majority and eight through Federation, and the Srpska Republic. 302-303 proportional representation. The voters go to the polls to elect the 10th November 2002 Presidency and the forty-two mem- Previous elections: 24th November bers of the Chamber of Representa- Parties % Seats 1997 tives. Simultaneously, the two entities Union for Monaco (UPM) 58.5 21 Parliamentary republic that became elect their own legislative bodies and National Union for the Future of Monaco (UNAM) independent from Yugoslavia in 1991. the Srpska Republic elects its Presi- Union for the Monegasque Two rounds of elections are held to dent and Vice-President.
  • Review of European and National Election Results 2014-2019 Mid-Term January 2017

    Review of European and National Election Results 2014-2019 Mid-Term January 2017

    Review of European and National Election Results 2014-2019 Mid-term January 2017 STUDY Public Opinion Monitoring Series Directorate-General for Communication Published by EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service Author: Jacques Nancy, Public Opinion Monitoring Unit PE 599.242 Directorate-General for Communication Public Opinion Monitoring Unit REVIEW EE2014 Edition Spéciale Mi-Législature Special Edition on Mid-term Legislature LES ÉLECTIONS EUROPÉENNES ET NATIONALES EN CHIFFRES EUROPEAN AND NATIONAL ELECTIONS RESULTS TABLES Mise à jour – 20 janvier 2017 Update – 20th January 2017 8éme Législature 8th Parliamentary Term DANS CETTE EDITION Page IN THIS EDITION Page EDITORIAL11 EDITORIAL I.COMPOSITION DU PARLEMENT EUROPÉEN 6 I. COMPOSITION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 6 A.REPARTITION DES SIEGES 7 A.DISTRIBUTION OF SEATS 7 B.COMPOSITION DU PARLEMENT 8 B.COMPOSITION OF THE PARLIAMENT 8 -9-9AU 01/07/2014 ON THE 01/07/2014 -10-10AU 20/01/2017 ON THE 20/01/2017 C.SESSIONS CONSTITUTIVES ET PARLEMENT 11 C.CONSTITUTIVE SESSIONS AND OUTGOING EP 11 SORTANT DEPUIS 1979 SINCE 1979 D.REPARTITION FEMMES - HOMMES 29 D.PROPORTION OF WOMEN AND MEN 29 AU 20/01/2017 ON 20/01/2017 -30-30PAR GROUPE POLITIQUE AU 20/01/2017 IN THE POLITICAL GROUPS ON 20/01/2017 ET DEPUIS 1979 AND SINCE 1979 E.PARLEMENTAIRES RÉÉLUS 33 E.RE-ELECTED MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT 33 II.NOMBRE DE PARTIS NATIONAUX AU PARLEMENT 35 II.NUMBER OF NATIONAL PARTIES IN THE EUROPEAN 35 EUROPEEN AU 20/01/2017 PARLIAMENT ON 20/01/2017 III.TAUX DE PARTICIPATION 37 III. TURNOUT 37 -38-38TAUX DE PARTICIPATION
  • DVE Discover Malta Guide

    DVE Discover Malta Guide

    Phone: (+356) 7947 1194 E-mail: [email protected] Web : www.devinkestates.com DISCOVER MALTA GUIDE NOTE TO READERS Thank you for downloading this Discover Malta Guide. Perhaps you are seriously considering a move for personal or business reasons or have Malta on your radar as one of several countries of interest. Now is the time to gather as much information as possible to make a balanced decision. Rather than re-invent the wheel and provide the same information so many other organizations already have, we have opted to aggregate content from trustworthy sources. The purpose of this report is to save you time and effort in doing your research. Our aim is to provide a realistic and unbiased view – the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly – from a global, regional, as well as local perspective. For your convenience, we have organized the content into different sections. You can find the index on page 3 in case you want to select certain topics of interest rather than reading the entire brochure from beginning to end. Lastly, I want to share my own personal view of Malta with you. I moved here from Holland in 2013. Since then, I have been working in the real estate industry, set up my own business, got married, rented a property, bought a house, and now enjoy raising two beautiful children. My ventures – or perhaps I should I say adventures – have helped me to gain insights on many different levels. I hope that my story, although not especially unique, may provide you additional perspective of what it’s like to be an expat in Malta.
  • Review of European and National Election Results Update: September 2019

    Review of European and National Election Results Update: September 2019

    REVIEW OF EUROPEAN AND NATIONAL ELECTION RESULTS UPDATE: SEPTEMBER 2019 A Public Opinion Monitoring Publication REVIEW OF EUROPEAN AND NATIONAL ELECTION RESULTS UPDATE: SEPTEMBER 2019 Directorate-General for Communication Public Opinion Monitoring Unit May 2019 - PE 640.149 IMPRESSUM AUTHORS Philipp SCHULMEISTER, Head of Unit (Editor) Alice CHIESA, Marc FRIEDLI, Dimitra TSOULOU MALAKOUDI, Matthias BÜTTNER Special thanks to EP Liaison Offices and Members’ Administration Unit PRODUCTION Katarzyna ONISZK Manuscript completed in September 2019 Brussels, © European Union, 2019 Cover photo: © Andrey Kuzmin, Shutterstock.com ABOUT THE PUBLISHER This paper has been drawn up by the Public Opinion Monitoring Unit within the Directorate–General for Communication (DG COMM) of the European Parliament. To contact the Public Opinion Monitoring Unit please write to: [email protected] LINGUISTIC VERSION Original: EN DISCLAIMER This document is prepared for, and primarily addressed to, the Members and staff of the European Parliament to assist them in their parliamentary work. The content of the document is the sole responsibility of its author(s) and any opinions expressed herein should not be taken to represent an official position of the Parliament. TABLE OF CONTENTS EDITORIAL 1 1. COMPOSITION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 5 DISTRIBUTION OF SEATS OVERVIEW 1979 - 2019 6 COMPOSITION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LAST UPDATE (31/07/2019) 7 CONSTITUTIVE SESSION (02/07/2019) AND OUTGOING EP SINCE 1979 8 PROPORTION OF WOMEN AND MEN PROPORTION - LAST UPDATE 02/07/2019 28 PROPORTIONS IN POLITICAL GROUPS - LAST UPDATE 02/07/2019 29 PROPORTION OF WOMEN IN POLITICAL GROUPS - SINCE 1979 30 2. NUMBER OF NATIONAL PARTIES IN THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT CONSTITUTIVE SESSION 31 3.