Contadora's Tortuous Path

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Contadora's Tortuous Path latin american issues May 25, two positions arose around Contadora's Contadora's ultimatum. On the one hand, Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras and Costa Rica Tortuous Path stated their willingness to sign the Treaty on June 6. Nicaragua, on the other hand, insisted it would sign only if Washington ceased its agression. Guatemalan president Vinicio Cerezo said that Nicaragua's position would mean an end to Latin When hopes were high for a The main point of tension at America's peace efforts in peaceful resolution, new the diplomatic summit was Central America. Likewise, in pressures once again Nicaragua's refusal to sign a his inaugural address on prevented the signing of the joint communique agreeing May 8, the new Costa Rican Contadora Treaty to a set date for the Peace president, Oscar Arias treaty's signature. Managua Sánchez, stated that the Contadora's efforts toward a argued that it could not Contadora Treaty was the peaceful, political solution to "dismantie its army at a time only alternative for the the Central American crisis when it is under attack from region, "or an apocalyptic increasingly resemble an the number one economic war will destroy us all." Hon- endless race. Each time the and military power in the duran head of state, José contestants seem to be world." Azcona, took a similar reaching the end of the stance. track, the finish-line gets Significantly, three pulled further back. Time Democratic congressmen Yet this eagerness to sign and time again, obstacles from the U.S., and a the Treaty changed, follow- appear in the path of new representative of the Euro- ing the presidential summit peace proposals. pean Economic Community, in the Guatemalan town of were present at the meeting Esquipulas. On May 27 In their search for a as observers. Contadora is- Rodolfo Castillo Claramount, breakthrough, the foreign af- sued a formal petition to the who is both vice-president fairs ministers of Mexico, United States Congress re- and minister of foreign af- Venezuela, Colombia and questing that the vote on fairs in the Salvadoran ad- Panama (the countries that President Reagan's ministration, declared that make up the Contadora proposed $100 million in aid his government would ask Group), as well as their to the contra "at least" be Contadora for an extension counterparts from Peru, postponed. on the time-limit. On the fol- Argentina, Brazil and lowing day, the Costa Rican Uruguay (the Contadora Between the April 7 meeting government said they con- Support Group), met in in Panama and the Central sidered the June 6 deadline Panama last April 5 through American presidential sum- "utopian." 7. They agreed on a two- mit held in Guatemala on month ultimatum, ending on June 6, for the five Central American nations to con- clude peace negotiations and sign the Contadora Treaty for Peace and Cooperation in Central America. Thus, the Group's efforts would end on that date. Discussions were tense at the April meeting. Reports indicated there were three main points of disagree- ment: arms controls and reductions, suspension of in- ternational military maneuvers, and treaty verification mechanisms. From left to right: Fernando Cardoze (Panamá). Bernardo Sepúlveda (México), Augusto Ramírez Ocampo (Colombia), Isidro Morales Paul (Venezuela). latin american issues The fact that the Nicaraguan restoration of democracy in "negotiating modifications government had changed its Nicaragua, that it cease to to the Treaty has come to an position was what led support subversion, that it end, since all that remains is Washington's Central break off military ties with to implement and execute American allies to bring up the Socialist countries, and the agreements, given the new obstacles to the that it reduce its military ap- political goodwill of the signature of the Treaty. In paratus. countries concerned." Esquipulas, the Sandinistas not only agreed to sign, they Thus, June 6 loomed closer As for the Panama Declara- presented a list of weapons and closer. Five days before tion, the document states and security aspects they the controversia) date, three basic commitments: would be willing to "reduce, Guatemalan president Central American nations limit, regulate or do away Vinicio Cerezo announced will neither lend their ter- 38 with." that none of the five Central ritory nor support irregular Washington's attitude, on the other hand, wavered between statements of sup- port for Contadora and open opposition to the peace- maker's activities. Presiden- tial envoy to Central America, Philip Habib, first said that the U.S. would sus- pend aid to the contras if Managua signed the Peace . Treaty. Present at Oscar Arias Sánchez's inaugura- tion in San José, Vice- President George Bush declared that the United States would abide by the Contadora agreements if they were "global and verifiable." Nonetheless, a week later, on May 14, White House spokesman Larry Speakes indicated that Washington would not withdraw its sup- port of the contra even if Nicaragua signed the peace accords. The following day, President Reagan confirmed Nicaraguan children defending their national sovereignty. this position. Meanwhile, Washington analysts spoke of struggles within the ad- American nations would forces; no country will join ministration concerning the sign the Peace Treaty on the military or political alliances official position vis a vis programmed date. He ex- that threaten peace and Contadora plained that the decision had security in the region; no been made at the Esquipulas power should provide The differences carne to light presidential summit. So military or logistical support when on May 20 the New June 6 came and went, and to irregular forces or subver- York Times published a Pen- nothing was signed. sive groups, nor threaten the tagon document which use of force as a means of argued that the Peace Treaty But there was one other overthrowing a government would leed the United meeting between Con- in the crea. States to a costly policy of tadora, its Support Groups containment of Nicaragua, and Central American Reactions to the final ver- as well as risking a representatives, to discuss sion of the Peace Treaty and generalized regional war. pending aspects of the to the Panama Declaration The Defense Department agreement. Out of this were diverse. The Sandinista immediately disowned the gathering carne two docu- newspaper, Barricada, said document. The conflict was ments: a definitive version of the documents were a apparently resolved when the Peace Treaty, and the "political bomb for the United the White House recon- Panama Declaration. Jorge States." On the other hand, firmed the official position: Abadía, Panamanian Foreign Guatemalan foreign affairs support for a peace treaty Affairs Minister, declared Minister Mario Quiñones, will be conditioned to the that the time for declared that Contadora's new proposal, "rather than closing gaps between the positions of the Central American countries, in cer­ tain aspects opens them even further." But the harshest criticism carne from El Salvador and Costa Rica, where the final version of the Treaty was referred to as "an in­ complete, gray and somewhat intranscendental document." At the same 39 time, it was announced that together with Honduras and Guatemala, they would work on a new plan to resolve the regional conflict. "Con­ tadora's tutelage has disap­ peared," said Salvadoran M inister Rodolfo Castillo. And Rodrigo Madrigal, head of Costa Rican diplomacy, accused Contadora of creating an aura of com­ placency around the San­ dinistas. "We leave behind the realm of complacency to enter the realm of peremp­ tory demands." Most regional analysts believe that the Reagan ad­ ministration's policy of sup­ port for the contra continues to be the "crucial element" hindering the Contadora agreement. And it's probably no chance coincidence that on the same day Secretary of State George Shultz stated that the Central American countries might reject the final version of the Peace Treaty, the Salvadoran government cal­ led a meeting to discuss the formation of an alternative to Contadora. Nicaragua was pointedly excluded from the initiative. The road to peace in Central America is long, winding, and full of obstacles. Once more the peace-making group's proposals come up against seemingly insur­ mountable difficulties. But �e membe� � Conwdora have reaffirmed their deter­ mination to continue their mediating efforts. The firm support of the world com­ munity is with them.* Horacio Castellanos Moya .
Recommended publications
  • La Censura Impuesta a La Prensa Escrita Durante El Gobierno
    1 UNIVERSIDAD DE SAN CARLOS DE GUATEMALA ESCUELA DE CIENCIAS DE LA COMUNICACIÓN “LA CENSURA IMPUESTA A LA PRENSA ESCRITA DURANTE EL GOBIERNO DEL ING. JORGE ANTONIO SERRANO ELÍAS” ILIANA MIRELLA MÉRIDA BARRIOS GUATEMALA, OCTUBRE DE 2004 2 UNIVERSIDAD DE SAN CARLOS DE GUATEMALA ESCUELA DE CIENCIAS DE LA COMUNICACIÓN TRABAJO DE TESIS “LA CENSURA IMPUESTA A LA PRENSA ESCRITA DURANTE EL GOBIERNO DEL ING. JORGE ANTONIO SERRANO ELÍAS” PRESENTADO POR: ILIANA MIRELLA MÉRIDA BARRIOS PREVIO A OPTAR EL TITULO DE LICENCIADA EN CIENCIAS DE LA COMUNICACIÓN ASESORA MA. ARACELLY MÉRIDA GUATEMALA, OCTUBRE DE 2004 3 RESUMEN UNIVERSIDAD DE SAN CARLOS DE GUATEMALA ESCUELA DE CIENCIAS DE LA COMUNICACIÓN INVESTIGADORA: ILIANA MIRELLA MÉRIDA BARRIOS TÍTULO: “LA CENSURA IMPUESTA A LA PRENSA ESCRITA DURANTE EL GOBIERNO DEL ING. JORGE ANTONIO SERRANO ELÍAS. PLANTEAMIENTO DEL PROBLEMA: ¿ Hubo o no censura a la prensa escrita durante el gobierno del Ing. Jorge Serrano Elías? TÉCNICA E INSTRUMENTO: La recopilación bibliográfica de libros: tesis, entrevistas, encuestas y análisis descriptivo del contenido de los periódicos de Prensa Libre, Siglo Veintiuno y la Hora tomando como base los adjetivos calificativos. PROCEDIMIENTO PARA OBTENER INFORMACIÓN: Para llegar a lograr los objetivos que se trazaron en la investigación, fue necesario el análisis descriptivo de los periódicos de: Prensa Libre, Siglo Veintiuno, y la Hora en el que se limitó a investigar sobre las opiniones de editoriales y artículos en cuanto a la crítica del gobierno de Jorge Antonio Serrano Elías y Censura a la Prensa, con el estudio del Adjetivo calificativo, que determina una cualidad en el sustantivo, en este caso se estableció sí fue favorable o desfavorable la opinión de los artículos y editoriales hacía el gobierno en el mes de mayo de 1993.
    [Show full text]
  • I Implementation of the Peace Accords in Guatemala 1990-The Present
    Implementation of the Peace Accords in Guatemala 1990-the Present: Relationships of Cooperation, Complementarity, and Competition between the Government and NGOs By Nicole Kleiman-Moran Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the College of Literature, Science, & Arts at the University of Michigan in partial fulfillment for the requirement for the degree of Bachelor of Arts (International Studies with Honors) 2016 Thesis Committee: Professor Sueann Caulfield Doctor Anthony Marcum I Abstract Title of Thesis: Implementation of the Peace Accords in Guatemala 1990-the Present: Relationships of Cooperation, Complementarity, and Competition between the Government and NGOs Nicole L. Kleiman-Moran, Bachelor of Arts, 2016 Thesis directed by: Sueann Caulfield and Anthony Marcum The 1996 Guatemalan Peace Accords attempted to address the major issues and grievances remaining from a 36 year long civil war that had ravaged the country. Peace Accord implementation requires work both from a government and NGOs. Using the relationship typology developed by Adil Najam and Jennifer Costen, this study finds that the Guatemalan government formed three distinct types of relationships (cooperation, complementarity, and competition) with the NGOs depending on the persistent post conflict issue. The Guatemalan Government assumed a relationship of cooperation with the NGOs on human rights and memorialization issues. The two entities assumed a relationship of complementarity on refugees and on indigenous rights. Finally, the entities assumed a relationship of competition on justice issues. Applying political survival theory, developed by James Morrow, Bruce Bueno de Mesquita, Randolph Siverson and Alastair Smith, onto the relationship types utilized in post conflict Guatemala, I argue that these relationships developed as a result of the political survival motivation by the Government who formed these relationships to retain its power in post-conflict Guatemala.
    [Show full text]
  • Vinicio Cerezo
    VINICIO CEREZO Presidente de Guatemala 1986-1991 Creador, promotor y firmante de los Acuerdos de Paz en Centroamérica, Esquipulas I y II Diputado de la Asamblea Nacional Diputado del Parlamento Centroamericano Fundador y Presidente de la Fundación Esquipulas para la Integración Centroamericana Conferencista Internacional Político, Abogado, Demócrata e Integracionista de corazón Perfil Extendido Vinicio Cerezo Presidente de Guatemala 1986-1991 PERFIL EXTENDIDO VINICIO CEREZO Presidente de Guatemala 1986-1991 ETAPA PRE-UNIVERSITARIA: Estudios Primarios y Secundarios: Colegio Católico Salesiano “Don Bosco”. Se graduó con Honores como Bachiller en Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales en 1959. ETAPA UNIVERSITARIA: Estudios Profesionales en la Universidad Nacional “San Carlos de los Caballeros de Guatemala” Se graduó como “Licenciado en Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales” en 1967 y como Abogado y Notario en Marzo de 1968. A lo largo de los Estudios Universitarios obtuvo dos veces el Reconocimiento como el Mejor Estudiante, diploma que se otorgaba a los estudiantes con mejores promedios de Notas. En las actividades estudiantiles, se destacó por su liderazgo político y organizativo en las siguientes actividades: Promotor y cofundador de la “Unión Cultural Estudiantil”, organizadora de eventos culturales y promotora de la impresión de ensayos universitarios sobre temas de importancia nacional; 1963. Organizador del “Primer Encuentro Centroamericano de Estudiantes de Derecho” 1964. Electo Miembro del Comité de Huelga de Dolores: 1964 y 1965 Electo Delegado Estudiantil ante el Consejo Superior de la Facultad de Derecho, 1965. Electo Presidente de la Asociación de Estudiantes de Derecho 1966-1967: en su período se logró el “Acuerdo de Cooperación Estudiantil para el Logro de la Excelencia Académica” entre los diversos grupos políticos de la Universidad.
    [Show full text]
  • The Foundational Moment of Guatemala's Contemporary State
    The foundational moment of Guatemala’s contemporary State: The transitional road to democracy and its influence in time Abstract This document develops a revision done to the process of transition towards democracy live in Guatemala around the middle eighties, making a critical and detailed evalution of the main events and how they influenced on the constitution of a new model of State. The research work allowed finding out intricacies of the process through several direct actors of the transition. After the democratic decade lived from 1944 through 1954, different from other studies, this research work points at the year 1973 as the slow beginning of a journey that would encounter different obstacles and some facts that turned out to be catalysts of the transition. Furthermore, it explains how the military-oligarchic system generated its own entropy and provided a scenario appropriate for changes that ended up in a new system. The role of politics in the process is highlighted and the influence of the christian-democrat way of thinking on the new Constitution, as well as a revision of the new institutional design. The research work also introduces the type of State built in regards to a historical evolution, closing with the implications the coup of 1993 had, the return to constitutional order and the constitutional reforms of that same year that somehow altered the original model. Key words 1. State. 2. Politics. 3. Guatemala. 4. Government. 5. Political system. 6. Power. 7. Political parties. 8. Democratic process. 1 The foundational moment of Guatemala’s contemporary State: The transitional road to democracy and its influence in time The transition processes towards democracy in Latin America have been passably heterogeneous regarding their characteristics; this seems like an indication that when it comes to this region it must be spoken about democracies because each State and society has differently comprehended its conception and evolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Amnesty International, Human Rights & U.S. Policy
    AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL, HUMAN RIGHTS & U.S. POLICY Maria Baldwin A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY December 2006 Committee: Gary R. Hess, Advisor Franklin W. Goza Graduate Faculty Representative Robert Buffington Douglas Forsyth ii ABSTRACT Gary R. Hess, Advisor This dissertation assesses Amnesty International’s ability to influence U.S. foreign policy through an examination of its human rights campaigns in three different nations—Guatemala, the United States and the People’s Republic of China. While these nations are quite different from one another, according to Amnesty International they share an important characteristic; each nation has violated their citizens’ human rights. Sometimes the human rights violations, which provoked Amnesty International’s involvement occurred on a large scale; such as the “disappearances” connected with Guatemala’s long civil war or the imprisonment of political dissidents in the PRC. Other times the human rights violations that spurred Amnesty International’s involvement occurred on a smaller-scale but still undermined the Universal Declaration of Human Rights; such as the United States use of capital punishment. During the Guatemalan and Chinese campaigns Amnesty International attempted to influence the United States relations with these countries by pressuring U.S. policymakers to construct foreign policies that reflected a grave concern for institutionalized human rights abuse and demanded its end. Similarly during its campaign against the United States use of the death penalty Amnesty International attempted to make it a foreign policy liability for the United States. How effective Amnesty International has been in achieving these goals is the subject of this dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • Programa Iii Foro Consultivo Regional De La Política Centroamericana De Gestión Integral De Riesgo De Desastres (Pcgir)
    PROGRAMA III FORO CONSULTIVO REGIONAL DE LA POLÍTICA CENTROAMERICANA DE GESTIÓN INTEGRAL DE RIESGO DE DESASTRES (PCGIR) 18 y 19 de Junio de 2015, San Salvador, El Salvador, Hotel Real Intercontinental Día 1: 18 de junio de 2015 HORARIO ACTIVIDAD 8:00 a 8:45 Inscripción y Registro 8:45 a 9:45 Visita a Feria del Conocimiento en Gestión Integral de Riesgo 10:00 a 11:00 Segmento 1. Ceremonia de Inauguración Salón Real (Agenda Especial) 11:00 a 11:30 Retiro de Autoridades y adecuación de Panel Entrevistas Segmento 2. Panel de Entrevista de Alto Nivel con Expertos y Altas Autoridades Públicas y Privadas /Salón Real Conducción del segmento: Lic. Salvador Castellanos, Comunicador Social y Periodista Internacional. Integrantes del Panel 1. Lic. Oscar Samuel Ortiz Ascencio, Vicepresidente de la República de El Salvador 11:30 a 13:30 2. Lic. Marco Vinicio Cerezo Arévalo; Ex Presidente de la República de Guatemala y Presidente Fundación Esquipulas para la Integración Centroamericana, 3. Lic. Ricardo Mena Speck, Jefe de la Oficina Regional, Las Américas, UNISDR 4. Dr. Fabrizio Poretti, Director Residente Adjunto, Cooperación Suiza para América Central 5. Dr. Allan Lavell, Coordinador Programa para el Estudios Social de los Riesgos y Desastres, Secretaría General, FLACSO, San José, Costa Rica. / Coordinador para América Central y el Caribe, Red Latinoamericana para el Estudio Social de los Desastres (LA RED). 13:30 a 14:30 Almuerzo, Salón Pabellón Segmento 3. Panel de alto nivel de los Directores de los Entes Rectores de Gestión de Riesgo y Protección Civil de Centroamérica. Consejo de Representantes del CEPREDENAC.
    [Show full text]
  • President George H.W. Bush Meetings with Foreigners, 1989
    President George H.W. Bush Meetings with Foreigners, 1989 Date Met with... Country/Organization Meeting Location Occasion January 24, 1989 Secretary General Javier Pérez de Cuéllar United Nations Washington, D.C. State Dinner February 2, 1989 President Yoweri Museveni Uganda Washington, D.C. Photo Opportunity February 2, 1989 President Mohamed Siad Barre Somalia Washington, D.C. Photo Opportunity February 2, 1989 Prime Minister Noboru Takeshita Japan Washington, D.C. Official Visit Chairman of Free Democratic Party Otto Graf Lambsdorff and Ambassador Federal Republic of February 8, 1989 Washington, D.C. Official Visit of Federal Republic of Germany to U.S. Jürgen Ruhfus Germany Chief of Federal Chancellery Wolfgang Schauble and Ambassador of Federal Republic of February 9, 1989 Washington, D.C. Official Visit Federal Republic of Germany to U.S. Jürgen Ruhfus Germany Supreme Patriarch and Catholicos of All Armenians Vazgen I and Armenian Apostolic February 9, 1989 Washington, D.C. Official Visit Catholicos of Great House of Cilicia Karekin II Church February 10, 1989 Prime Minister Brian Mulroney Canada Ottawa, Canada Official Visit February 17, 1989 Prince Charles (Prince of Wales) United Kingdom Camp David, Maryland Private Dinner 1 President George H.W. Bush Meetings with Foreigners, 1989 Date Met with... Country/Organization Meeting Location Occasion February 23, 1989 President François Mitterrand France Tokyo, Japan Funeral of Japanese Emperor February 23, 1989 Prime Minister Noboru Takeshita Japan Tokyo, Japan Funeral of Japanese Emperor Bilateral Meetings Tokyo, Japan Funeral of Japanese Emperor President Mário Soares Portugal President Hosni Mubarak Egypt Prime Minister Chatichai Choonhavan Thailand February 23, 1989 King Juan Carlos I Spain King Hussein I Jordan President Chaim Herzog Israel President R.
    [Show full text]
  • G U a T E M a L a Fact Sheet
    G U A T E M A L A Fact Sheet ___________________________________ Land and People: - The northernmost of the Central American nations, Guatemala is the size of Tennessee. - Its neighbors are Mexico on the north and west, and Belize, Honduras, and El Salvador on the east. - Guatemala has a population of approximately 12.3 million people. - Mestizos known as Ladinos in Central America, (mixed Amerindian-Spanish ancestry) and people of European descent (primarily of Spanish) comprise 60% of the population while Amerindians comprise approximately 40%. - The literacy rate comes to 71% (2003 est.) - The predominant religion is Roman Catholicism. Protestantism and traditional Mayan religions are practiced by an estimated 33% and 1% of the population, respectively. - Although the official language is Spanish, it is not universally spoken among the indigenous population, or is often spoken as a second language; 21 distinct Mayan languages are still spoken, especially in rural areas. ___________________________________________________________________ History: - Once the site of the impressive ancient Mayan civilization, Guatemala was conquered by Spanish conquistador Pedro de Alvarado in 1524 and became a republic in 1839 after the United Provinces of Central America collapsed. - After Gen. Jorge Ubico's overthrow in 1944 by the “October Revolutionaries,” a group of left-leaning students and professionals, liberal-democratic coalitions led by Juan José Arévalo (1945–1951) and Jacobo Arbenz Guzmán (1951– 1954) instituted social and political reforms that strengthened the peasantry and urban workers at the expense of the military and big landowners. With covert U.S. backing, Col. Carlos Castillo Armas led a coup in 1954, and ousted Arbenz, who took refuge in Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Efraín Ríos Montt (José Efraínríos Montt)
    Efraín Ríos Montt (José EfraínRíos Montt) Guatemala, Presidente de la República Duración del mandato: 23 de Marzo de 1982 - de de Nacimiento: Huehuetenango, departamento de Huehuetenango, 16 de Junio de 1926 Partido político: FRG Profesión : Militar Resumen La terrible guerra civil que asoló Guatemala entre 1960 y 1996, con un balance estimado de 200.000 muertos y desaparecidos, alcanzó sus máximas cotas de violencia en los 17 meses, entre 1982 y 1983, que el general Efraín Ríos Montt detentó el poder en la nación centroamericana. Aupado a la presidencia de la República por los oficiales que derrocaron al general Romeo Lucas, el nuevo dictador, ferviente ministro de una iglesia evangélico- pentecostal, implantó un gobierno castrense puro y duro que suprimió el anterior régimen reaccionario de corte cívico-militar y que traía ímpetus de transformación nacional. Así, la extrema derecha tradicional, ultraconservadora y oligárquica, fue desplazada por un nuevo radicalismo antirrevolucionario que combinaba las declaraciones de desarrollo social de indígenas y campesinos, y de guerra de exterminio de las guerrillas comunistas que buscaban reclutarlos. Ríos Montt, convencido de su misión político-religiosa, dotó al terrorismo de Estado, bien presente desde mucho antes del golpe de 1982, de un carácter sistemático al hacerlo parte integral de un plan global de reorganización del país que supuso la militarización del campo por el Ejército y las Patrullas de Autodefensa Civil. Todo ello se tradujo en la matanza generalizada y sin restricciones legales de aquellos, campesinos mayas fundamentalmente, a los que supuestamente se venía a liberar. Un mínimo de 10.000 ejecutados extrajudiciales, decenas de grandes masacres, centenares de aldeas arrasadas y más de 100.000 refugiados fueron el estremecedor balance de los planes y operaciones, ejemplo insuperable de las tácticas de tierra quemada, ejecutados por el fanático gobernante de facto.
    [Show full text]
  • Análisis Semiológico Del Discurso De Toma De Posesión Del Presidente De Guatemala Marco Vinicio Cerezo Arévalo”
    UNIVERSIDAD DE SAN CARLOS DE GUATEMALA ESCUELA DE CIENCIAS DE LA COMUNICACIÓN “Análisis semiológico del discurso de toma de posesión del presidente de Guatemala Marco Vinicio Cerezo Arévalo” Trabajo de tesis presentado por Genesis Naama Agustin Previo a optar al título de Licenciada en Ciencias de la Comunicación Asesor de tesis Lic. Freddy Alexander Poroj Moscoso Guatemala, abril de 2017 UNIVERSIDAD DE SAN CARLOS DE GUATEMALA ESCUELA DE CIENCIAS DE LA COMUNICACIÓN Director M.Sc. Sergio Vinicio Morataya Consejo Directivo Representantes Docentes Lic. Mario Campos M.A. Gustavo Adolfo Morán Representantes Estudiantiles Anaité Machuca Mario Barrientos Representante de Egresados Lic. Johnny Michael González Batres Secretaria Administrativa M. Sc. Claudia Molina Tribunal Examinador Lic. Freddy Alexander Poroj Moscoso, presidente. M.A. Elpidio Guillén de León, revisor. Lic. Luis Arturo Pedroza Gaitán, revisor. Doc. Marco Julio Ochoa España, examinador. Lic. Hugo Rolando Castro Guzmán, examinador. Lic. Roberto Murga, suplente. Agradecimientos A Dios: por sus infinitas bendiciones en mi vida, siendo este logro académico una de ellas. A mis padres: José Antonio Contreras (†) y Loida Agustín gracias por su amor, su paciencia y su apoyo incondicional. Gracias por saber guiarme y ser mi ejemplo de lucha y perseverancia, los amo. A mis hermanos y hermanas: Vivian, Tanya, Luis y Vinicio gracias por sus consejos, apoyo y solidaridad. A mis sobrinos y sobrinas: por motivar y darle felicidad a mi vida. A mis amigos y amigas: gracias por su sinceridad y por estar conmigo en todo. A mi novio: Bryan Morales por todo su apoyo, por sus palabras de fortaleza, su confianza, amor y paciencia.
    [Show full text]
  • PRESIDENTES EMPRENDEDORES DESDE 1821 AL CORONAVIRUS Entrepreneur Presidents from 1821 to the Coronavirus
    PRESIDENTES EMPRENDEDORES DESDE 1821 AL CORONAVIRUS Entrepreneur Presidents from 1821 to the Coronavirus JOSÉ MOLINA CALDERÓN1 Resumen Con motivo del Bicentenario de la Independencia de Guatemala, 1821-2021, se hace un repaso breve de las distintas crisis que han vivido los presidentes de Guatemala: políticas, militares, sanitarias, económicas, sociales, geológicas y del medio ambiente, entre otras; hasta llegar al Coronavirus. Palabras clave Presidentes, Guatemala, crisis, bicentenario, emprendedores, coronavirus. Abstract Inspired by the Bicentennial of the Independence of Guatemala, 1821-2021, a brief summary is presented of the different crises that our Guatemalan Presidents have endured: political, military, health related, economic, social, geological and environmental among others, up to the Coronavirus pandemic. Key Words Presidents, Guatemala, crisis, bicentennial, entrepreneurs, coronavirus. Sumario: 1. Introducción. 2. La Independencia de 1821 y los gobiernos posteriores. 3. Los gobiernos liberales. 4. Los gobiernos de la Revolución. 5. Los gobiernos de la Contrarrevolución y gobiernos militares. 6. Los gobiernos democráticos hasta la fecha. 7. Conclusiones. 1 Licenciado en Economía graduado de la Universidad San Carlos de Guatemala. Miembro de Número de la Academia de Geografía e Historia de Guatemala. Autor de diversos libros sobre temas económicos e históricos de Guatemala. Correo electrónico: [email protected] 1 Auctoritas prudentium 1. Introducción Con motivo del Bicentenario de la Independencia de Guatemala, 1821-2021, se hace un repaso de las distintas crisis que han vivido los presidentes de Guatemala: políticas, militares, sanitarias, económicas, sociales, geológicas y del medio ambiente, entre otras; hasta llegar al Coronavirus. Se recorren las crisis que enfrentaron individualmente los mandatarios de Guatemala, presidentes o jefes de Estado, a lo largo de 200 años, y los resultados que se produjeron, que en general fueron para bien.
    [Show full text]
  • Guatemala: Del Estado Burocrático-Autoritario Al Estado Fragmentado
    Working Paper Guatemala: del Estado burocrático-autoritario al Estado fragmentado (Guatemala: From the authoritarian bureaucratic state to the fragmented state) Edgar Balsells, Ph.D. Elena Díez Pinto, Ph.D. © 2019 Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy This material may be quoted or reproduced without prior permission, provided appropriate credit is given to the author and Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy. Wherever feasible, papers are reviewed by outside experts before they are released. However, the research and views expressed in this paper are those of the individual researcher(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the Baker Institute. This paper is a work in progress and has not been submitted for editorial review. Índice Introducción ................................................................................................................................... i I. Desarrollo histórico y políticas públicas (1944-1985) .............................................................. 1 1.1 La primavera guatemalteca y la guerra fría (1944-1954) .................................................................. 1 1.2 El Estado Burocrático Autoritario (1954-1985) .................................................................................. 1 1.3 Actores protagonistas del período ......................................................................................................... 4 i. El gobierno de Estados Unidos y su Embajada en Guatemala ........................................
    [Show full text]