DOCSLIB.ORG

Download NOVEMBER 1967.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download NOVEMBER 1967.Pdf NOVEMBER 1967 7;J ENFORCEMENT BULLETIN FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE J. EDGAR HOOVER, DIRECTOR NOVEMBER 1967 VOL. 36, NO. 11 THE COVER­Neutron activation analysis. See article on 35th Anniver· sary 0/ FBI Laboratory, page 3. - LAW ENFORCEMENT BULLETIN CONTENTS Message From Director]' Edgar Hoover 1 A Team Against Crime­Law Enforcement and the e Laboratory . 3 Investigation of Safe Burglaries, by Lt. Col. Joseph Dussia, Deputy Commissioner, Pennsylvania State Police, Harrisbnrg, Pa . 7 Miami Police Inaugurate Video Identification, by Charles B. Schildecker, Chairman, Police Science and Criminology, Miami­Dade Junior College, Miami, Fla. 14 Search of Motor Vehicles (Part IX ) 19 Published by the ationwide Crimescope 21 FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION I nvestigators' A ids 22 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Washington, D.C. 20535 Wanted by the FBI 28 TODAY, THOUSANDS OF AMERICANS live in fear. to grow. This is true, but the volume of crime is They fear for their lives, the safety of their fam- up 62 percent since 1960 while our national ilies, their homes, and their businesses. The cause population has risen only 9 percent during that of their fear is CRIME. period. Thus, crime is outstripping population Without a doubt, crime is rapidly becoming growth by almost 7 to 1. our Nation's number one internal problem. For Weare told that revised and improved report- years, we have seen apologists, misguided so- ing methods by law enforcement agencies result ciologists, and well­meaning but misinformed in more violations being reported. This conten- public officials rationalize the spiraling crime tion carries no weight. Hundreds of departments rate and excuse criminal behavior. We have seen which have had approved uniform crime report- pathetic public ignore the warning signals of ing systems for years continue to have increases • ing criminality which is costing taxpayers an in all categories year after year with no change estimated $27 billion annually. We have seen a whatsoever in their reporting methods. These in- criminal "feedback", caused by judicial lenien- creases are attributable to only one thing­a rise cies, including pardons, paroles, and probation, in the volume of crime. Further, agencies which which is a disgrace to our system of criminal do update their reporting systems are not in- justice. And we have seen loopholes, technicali- cluded in the national trend totals until they have ~ ties, and delays release hundreds of hardened, established two comparable records under their unrepentant criminals on the streets to prey revised setup. This is done to avoid any marked again on the public while awaiting trial on easily increase or decrease which may result from a provable charges. change in reporting procedures. Nearly 31,4 million crimes were reported in And we are told that much of the rise in crime ~ 1966, an 11 percent increase over 1965. Figures is caused by the extensive population growth of for the first 6 months of 1967 show a 17 percent the crime­prone young age group. Here again we ,. increase above the 1966 totals for the same pe- see shallow reasoning. The young­age­group riod. Is it any wonder that more and more people population, 10 to 17 years, rose 19 percent dur- are living in fear of crime? ing the 7­year period of 1960 tbrough 1966. Ar- rests of persons in this group for serious crimes Let us examine some of the popular arguments increased 54 percent during the same time. ~ by those who attempt to explain away our in- ~ tolerable crime problem. First, we are told that No right­thinking person could oppose long- crime increases because our population continues range programs to alleviate and eradicate con- MESSAGE FROM THE DIRECTOR ditions which breed crime. But the man, woman, his community, then justice is not served. Rather, and child on the street today are more concerned the criminal is being favored at the expense of with their immediate safety. And rightly so, since the law-abiding citizen. the risk of their becoming victims of serious Crime can no longer be shrouded by appease• crime has risen 48 percent since 1960. ment and rationalization. Its magnitude is fright• The young child who is criminally assaulted, ening. Crime must be reduced by eliminating the the corner grocer who is repeatedly robbed, the huge profits and the soft justice which attract elderly lady at the bus stop who is mugged and criminal-minded individuals. A valanches of brutally beaten, and the thousands of others who crime and terrorism cannot be tolerated in a are victimized each day by vicious thugs want society of free men. Either we win the war against instant as well as permanent relief. They, too, crime or the priceless heritage which we cherish have rights. But their cries for help are fre• will be destroyed. quently drowned out by the clamor for mercy and leniency for guilty lawbreakers who scoff at law Full justice is needed-stern justice. We need and order and the rights of society. justice which keeps the balance true and affords the law-abiding public an even break. We need Justice must extend beyond the courtroom justice which deals swiftly and surely with the back to the site where the victim's rights are criminal, convincing justice which means a qui • . violated. When the individual is no longer rea• arrest, prompt prosecution, and substantial pu. sonably secure in his home and on the streets of ishment of the guilty lawbreaker. NOVEMBER 1, 1967 HOOVER, Director 35th -4nni(ler~ar'l-FBI LABORATORY A Team Against Crime -Law Enforcement and the Laboratory Neutron activation analysis represents a significant advance in scientific crime detection and, in some cases, can be a most valuable aid to law enforcement officers seeking the missing link in an intricate investigation. The FBI Laboratory cele- brates its 35th Anniversary on November 24,1967_ In its brief but significant " history, the Laboratory has steadily kept pace with the rapid progress of lawen- forcement. The article be- ginning on the next page gives a brief account of some of the achievements of the Laboratory during the past 35 years. Labo~ato~y in Washington, D.C., e exammatIOn. At Mabel's trial a Special Agent of the Laboratory testified that he ob• tained skeletal material as well as tis• sue from the submitted debris, and a member of the Division of Physical Anthropology, Smithsonian Institu• tion, testified that the skeletal material was of human origin. Through further comparison with X-rays taken of the victim before his death, the Smithso• nian expert concluded that the skeletal remains were probably those of the victim. On that same date, an Agent from the FBI Laboratory testified that chemical tests for arsenic on the skeletal material and tissue were in• conclusive because of contamination by interfering substances, but that neutron activation analysis success· fully proved its presence. Neutron Activation In neutron activation analysie sample of unknown material is ir• radiated with neutrons (nuclear par• ticles). Some of the irradiated atoms in the unknown material are thereby made radioactive and begin to disin· A Laboratory expert determines the hardness of small pieces of metal with the microhardness tester. tegrate (radioactively) with the emis· sion of gamma rays. The energy of these gamma rays is measured with a gamma ray spectrometer. These en• SlOWly but indeed surely, Mabel! Mabel then dragged the body to a ergy values are then used to identify was murdering her husband-a bit of nearby foundation site of a razed the element in the original material. arsenic in his coffee twice a week was building, covered it with broken fur· Quantitative measurements of the accomplishing her purpose. The un• niture, lumber, and roofing material, elements present can be made by fortunate husband soon became so and burned it. In the next few days comparing the radioactivity of the weak he was unable to work; and doc• she burned the body repeatedly. She elements in the evidentiary material tors, without the slightest suspicion of even crushed the bones and flesh that with the radioactivity of known his true condition, were unable to halt remained, added coal to the fire, and amounts of these elements. his phy ical deterioration. After a few burned them again until she could find Mabel was subsequently sentenced months, Mabel, a mother of nine, grew no trace of the body. to life imprisonment on the charge of weary of her cold, deliberate scheme. Three months later in an interview first degree murder. One day she shoved her weakened with police officers, Mabel signed a ot 0 many years ago, Mabel husband backwards onto a bed and voluntary statement confessing the might have escaped punishment for choked him to death with a small murder of her spou e. her act of inhumanity. Even after length of rope. hortly thereafter, dirt and debris igning a confession, had there been frol11 the site where the body had been no physical proof of foul play, • 1 Fictitious. burned were delivered to the FBI might have gone free. However, 4 FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin ' of the world today face more techniques and equipment. In April Avenue, where FBI Headquarters is the investigative ingenuity of a 1931 a Special Agent of the FBI en• located. On August 11, 1943, the skilled law enforcement officer, for rolled in a course offered by the scien• name was officially changed to the FBI many are the times when their avenue tific crime detection laboratory of a Laboratory. of escape is completely sealed off by large midwestern university. ow that Mr. Hoover's idea had the findings of a modern crime detec• A few months later the purchase of become a reality, his efforts were di• tion laboratory.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Review of FBI Security Programs, March 2002
    U.S. Department of Justice A Review of FBI Security Programs Commission for Review of FBI Security Programs March 2002 Commission for the Review of FBI Security Programs United States Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Room 1521 Washington, DC 20530 (202) 616-1327 Main (202) 616-3591 Facsimile March 31, 2002 The Honorable John Ashcroft Attorney General United States Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530 Dear Mr. Attorney General: In March 2001, you asked me to lead a Commission to study security programs within the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Your request came at the urging of FBI Director Louis Freeh, who had concluded that an outside review was critical in light of the then recently discovered espionage by a senior Bureau official. In discharging my duties, I turned to six distinguished citizens as fellow Commissioners and to a staff of highly qualified professionals. I want to acknowledge the diligence with which my colleagues pursued the complex matters within our mandate. The Commission took its responsibilities seriously. It was meticulous in its investigation, vigorous in its discussions, candid in sharing views, and unanimous in its recommendations. When I agreed to chair the Commission, you promised the full cooperation and support of the Department of Justice and the FBI. That promise has been fulfilled. I would like to thank the Department’s Security and Emergency Planning Staff for the expert help they gave us, and I especially commend the cooperation of Director Mueller and FBI personnel at every level, who have all been chastened by treachery from within.
    [Show full text]
  • The Department of Justice and the Limits of the New Deal State, 1933-1945
    THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND THE LIMITS OF THE NEW DEAL STATE, 1933-1945 A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY AND THE COMMITTEE ON GRADUATE STUDIES OF STANFORD UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Maria Ponomarenko December 2010 © 2011 by Maria Ponomarenko. All Rights Reserved. Re-distributed by Stanford University under license with the author. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- Noncommercial 3.0 United States License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/ This dissertation is online at: http://purl.stanford.edu/ms252by4094 ii I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. David Kennedy, Primary Adviser I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Richard White, Co-Adviser I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Mariano-Florentino Cuellar Approved for the Stanford University Committee on Graduate Studies. Patricia J. Gumport, Vice Provost Graduate Education This signature page was generated electronically upon submission of this dissertation in electronic format. An original signed hard copy of the signature page is on file in University Archives. iii Acknowledgements My principal thanks go to my adviser, David M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Richard Aoki Case: Was the Man Who Armed the Black Panther Party an FBI Informant?
    THE RICHARD AOKI CASE: WAS THE MAN WHO ARMED THE BLACK PANTHER PARTY AN FBI INFORMANT? by Natalie Harrison A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Wilkes Honors College in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Arts in Liberal Arts and Sciences with a Concentration in History Wilkes Honors College of Florida Atlantic University Jupiter, Florida April 2013 THE RICHARD AOKI CASE: WAS THE MAN WHO ARMED THE BLACK PANTHERS AN FBI INFORMANT? by Natalie Harrison This thesis was prepared under the direction of the candidate’s thesis advisor, Dr. Christopher Strain, and has been approved by the members of her supervisory committee. It was submitted to the faculty of The Honors College and was accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts in Liberal Arts and Sciences. SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE: ____________________________ Dr. Christopher Strain ___________________________ Dr. Mark Tunick ____________________________ Dr. Daniel White ____________________________ Dean Jeffrey Buller, Wilkes Honors College ____________ Date ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank, first and foremost, Dr. Strain for being such a supportive, encouraging and enthusiastic thesis advisor – I could not have done any of this had he not introduced me to Richard Aoki. I would also like to thank Dr. Tunick and Dr. White for agreeing to be my second readers and for believing in me and this project, as well as Dr. Hess for being my temporary advisor when I needed it. And finally, I would like to thank my family and friends for all their support and for never stopping me as I rattled on and on about Richard Aoki and how much my thesis felt like a spy movie.
    [Show full text]
  • The FBI's Counterterrorism Program
    U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation Report to the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the United States: The FBI’s Counterterrorism Program Since September 2001 April 14, 2004 Report to The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the United States The FBI’s Counterterrorism Program Since September 2001 TABLETABLE OF OFCONTENTS CONTENTS I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY....................................................................11 II FBI ORGANIZATIONAL CHART................................................. 3 III TIMELINE OF SIGNIFICANT REFORMS AND INITIATIVES SINCE 9/11/01.......................................................... 4 IV INTRODUCTION......................................................................................66 V PRIORITIZATION....................................................................................77 The New Priorities.........................................................................................77 1 Protect the United States from Terrorist Attack..........................................77 2 Protect the United States Against Foreign Intelligence Operations and Espionage........................................................................................77 3 Protect the United States Against Cyber-based Attacks and High-Technology Crimes..................................................................88 4 Combat Public Corruption at all Levels.......................................................88 5 Protect Civil Rights......................................................................................88
    [Show full text]
  • FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin
    LAW ENFORCEMENT BULLETIN 'D66T~ FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE J. EDGAR HOOVER, DIRECTOR JULY 1965 VOL. 34, NO. 7 ­­­­­­­­­ THE COVER-Director J. Edgar Hoover estab· lished the FBI National Academy in 1935. See 30th anniversary article beginning on page 2. LAW ENFORCEMENT BULLETIN CONTENTS Message From Director J. Edgar Hoover 1 The FBI National Academy-Thirty Years of Progress Through Training . 2 The Morals Squad, by William M. Lombard, Chief of Police, Rochester, N.Y. Taking Inventory, by Dwight]. Dalbey, Special Agent, Federal Bureau of Investigation 12 Nationwide Crimes cope 13 Investigators' Aids 23 Wanted by the FBI 24 Published by 'he FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Washington, D.C. 20535 WE CAN EXPECT the coming weeks to present a pied" appearance often discourage and prevent stiff challenge to law enforcement. Predictions burglaries. are prevalent throughout the country for a "long, Crimes against property, however, are only a hot summer" because of anticipated increases of minor part of the problem. Far more appalling disturbances and violent crimes. are the vicious attacks on defenseless children by We would hope the prognosticators of these sexual deviates and the murders, rapes, and ag- ominous conditions are wrong; we would hope gravated assaults which register sharp rises dur- that a recordbreaking summer of strife and law- ing the summer. The intensity and frequency of 1u1ness can be averted. But in addition to the these violations haunt every community. Law annual seasonal increase of summertime crime­- enforcement is still searching for effective pre- crimes of passion and violence­­we can also ex- ventive action against them, and certainly, neg- ~ ect difficulties and violations connected with ligence and public indifference do not lessen the .
    [Show full text]
  • National Academy of Public Administration Panel on FBI Reorganization
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION 1100 New York Ave NW, Ste 1090 East TEL (202) 347-3190 FAX (202) 393-0993 Washington, D.C. 20005 INTERNET: www.napawash.org Dick Thornburgh Chairman Academy Panel on FBI Reorganization Testimony Before the Subcommittee on Commerce, State, Justice, the Judiciary, and Related Agencies Committee on Appropriations House of Representatives June 18, 2003 Chairman Wolf, Representative Serrano, and Members of the Subcommittee. I appreciate the opportunity to appear before the Subcommittee to discuss the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (FBI’s) reorganization. I am speaking today as Chair of the National Academy of Public Administration’s Panel on the FBI Reorganization. The Academy is an independent non- profit organization chartered by Congress to assist public institutions in improving their performance. Other members of the Academy’s Panel include Robert Alloway, Frank Chellino, Martin Faga, Kristine Marcy, Robert O’Neill, and Harold Saunders. (See Attachment A) In June 2002, on behalf of the Academy’s Panel, I testified before this Subcommittee on the FBI’s proposed reorganization plan. Specifically, we: · endorsed the creation of the five new divisions Director Mueller recommended · suggested additional steps to help implement the reorganization successfully · expressed concerns about information technology and information sharing, that were critical to combating terrorism and improving the FBI’s overall performance This Subcommittee subsequently approved that plan. The urgency of Congressional action last year required the Panel to expedite its review. However, at the Subcommittee’s request, we have continued to monitor and assess the FBI’s reorganization progress this year in seven key areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Download SEPTEMBER 1970.Pdf
    SEPTEMBER 1970 LAW ENFORCEMENT BULLETIN FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE J. EDGAR HOOVER, DIRECTOR SEPTEMBER 1970 VOL. 39, NO.9 THE COVER-A pilot for the Kentucky State Police Air Patrol watches from the air as a ground unit catches up with a speeder. See article be· ginning on page 2. LAW ENFORCEMENT BULLETIN CONTENTS Message From Director J. Edgar Hoover 1 Kentucky State Police Spread Their Wings, by Lt. Col. Paul M. Smith, Deputy Director, Ken­ tucky State Police, Frankfort, Ky. 2 Gunpowder and Shot Pattern Tests 7 A Modern Telecommunications Center for Effec­ tive Law Enforcement, by Sgt. Jack N. Lister, Police Department, Greenville, S.C. 12 Keep the Pressure on Car Thieves, by Col. Ralph D. Scott, Director, Arkansas State Police, Little Rock, Ark. 16 Crime Combat Team, by Kuniyasu T suchida, Publl.hed by the Director, Personnel and Training Division, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Metropolitan Police Department, Tokyo, Japan 21 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Police Cadets on a College Campus 24 Wa.hlngton, D.C. 20535 A Successful Strategy in the War Against Crime, by William D. Leeke, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections, Columbia, S.C. 25 Can You Identify These Bank Robbers? 32 MESSAGE FROM THE DIRECTOR • • • . • • To All Law Enforcement OHicia i IN A VERY SHORT TIME our Nation's colleges sibility of maintaining order. Certainly, un- and universities will begin their fall terms. limited freedom of students to disrupt or destroy I Thousands of our finest young people will resume and doubtful punishment for such activity give their pursuit of education that will enable them great impetus to its continuation.
    [Show full text]
  • Deadly Discretion: the Failure of Police Use of Force Policies to Meet Fundamental International Human Rights Law and Standards
    University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound Global Human Rights Clinic 2020 Deadly Discretion: The Failure of Police Use of Force Policies to Meet Fundamental International Human Rights Law and Standards University of Chicago Law School - Global Human Rights Clinic UniversityofChicagoLawSchoolGlobalHumanRightsClinic@chicagounbound.edu Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/ihrc Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation University of Chicago Law School - Global Human Rights Clinic, "Deadly Discretion: The Failure of Police Use of Force Policies to Meet Fundamental International Human Rights Law and Standards" (2020). Global Human Rights Clinic. 14. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/ihrc/14 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in Global Human Rights Clinic by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DEADLY DISCRETION: The Failure of Police Use of Force Policies to Meet Fundamental International Human Rights Law and Standards THE INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS CLINIC Table of Contents DEADLY DISCRETION: The Failure of Police Use of Force Policies to Meet Fundamental International Human Rights Law and Standards INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS CLINIC, UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW SCHOOL2 Introduction 1 Scope and Methodology 5 Summary of Findings and Recommendations 6 International Human Rights Law and Standards 11 U.N. Code of Conduct for Law Enforcement Officials 12 U.N. Basic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement Officials 12 Report of the U.N. Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial, Summary on Arbitrary Executions 13 International Standards on Police Use of Lethal Force: Legality, Necessity, Proportionality 13 and Accountability Evaluation of Police Department Use of Lethal Force Policies in the 20 Largest U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication (76Th, Kansas City, Missouri, August 11-14, 1993)
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 362 918 CS 508 352 TITLE Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication (76th, Kansas City, Missouri, August 11-14, 1993). Part VI: Media and Law. INSTITUTION Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication. PUB DATE Aug 93 NOTE 363p.; For other sections of these proceedings, see CS 508 347-362. For 1992 proceedings, see ED 349 608-623. PUB TYPE Collected Works - Conference Proceedings (021) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC15 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Copyrights; *Court Litigation; Freedom of Speech; *Legal Problems; *Libel and Slander; *Mass Media; Media Research; Sex Discrimination IDENTIFIERS Canada; Congress; Editorial Policy; European Court of Human Rights; Federal Communications Commission; First Amendment; Florida; Journalism Research; Journalists; Public Records; Search Warrants ABSTRACT The Media and Law section of this collection of conference presentations contains the following 12 papers: "An Analysis of the Role of Insurance, Prepublication Review and Correction Policies in Threatened and Actual Libel Suits" (Elizabeth K. Hansen and Roy L. Moore); "Private Defamation Plaintiffs and Falsity since 'Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. V. Hepps'" (Brian J. Steffen); "'Craft v. Metromedia, Inc.' and Its Social-Legal Progeny" (Jeremy Harris Lipschultz); "Words That Might Get You SLAPPed: Economic Interests vs. the First Amendment's Speech and Petition Clauses" (Paul H. Gates, Jr.); "Journalists' Right to Copy Audio and Video Tapes Presented as Evidence durint Trials" (Sherrie L. Wilson); "A Rupture in Copyright" (Frederick Wasser); "Expansion of Communications Freedom by the European Court of Human Rights" (Robert L. Spellman); "The 'Opinion Defense' Is Not Dead: A Survey of Libel Cases Decided under the 'Milkovich' Test" (W.
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2009 Budget Request Summary: a Pathway to Achieving Critical End-State Capabilities for the Federal Bureau of Investigation
    Table of Contents Page No. I. Overview ………………………………………………………………….............. 1-1 II Summary of Program Changes…………………………………………….. 2-1 III. Appropriations Language and Analysis of Appropriations Language….......... 3-1 IV. Decision Unit Justification A. Intelligence………………………………………………………………… . 4-1 1. Program Description 2. Performance Tables 3. Performance, Resources, and Strategies a. Performance Plan and Report for Outcomes b. Strategies to Accomplish Outcomes c. Results of Programs Assessment Rating Tool (PART) Reviews B. CT/CI……………………………………………………………………… 4-15 1. Program Description 2. Performance Tables 3. Performance, Resources, and Strategies a. Performance Plan and Report for Outcomes b. Strategies to Accomplish Outcomes c. Results of Programs Assessment Rating Tool (PART) Reviews C. CEFC………………………………………………………………………....... 4-39 1. Program Description 2. Performance Tables 3. Performance, Resources, and Strategies a. Performance Plan and Report for Outcomes b. Strategies to Accomplish Outcomes c. Results of Programs Assessment Rating Tool (PART) Reviews D. CJS………………………………………………………………………… ...... 4-65 1. Program Description 2. Performance Tables 3. Performance, Resources, and Strategies a. Performance Plan and Report for Outcomes b. Strategies to Accomplish Outcomes c. Results of Programs Assessment Rating Tool (PART) Reviews V. E-Gov Initiatives……………………………………………………………. 5-1 VI. Program Increases by Item………………………………………………… 6-1 Domain and Operations Increases Response to a WMD Incident……………………………………………. 6-1 CBRNE/WMD Forensic Response
    [Show full text]
  • Download OCTOBER 1985.Pdf
    October 1985 Law Enforcement Bulletin ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• I FBI I I LAW ENFORCEMENT I BUlLETIN i I I I• I • •I I I Jos.,.. Huler I. w•• te4 for the Ud...pl...f Erlnt K. N........1 • $1""" Cit,. low., Feb","" 4. 1935. fOT ..Mth oft..... h..... ;""Ieled • by • Fed.ral Grolld Jur, .t SI_ CII,. Iowa oa June I, 1935. H••I., I. al.o Wlllted for tb. kld..,i.. of H....... G. Bred...tei••r ."" DeaD I S. J.lDeo I( NI.ho.bot••, MI ....'i. on J_ 3, 1935. A ~Ial.t .... filed bofo,. a Unit"" Sta,•• Commissioner .t Omht. Nebr..ka J_ 27, 1935 thar,l.. hi. with tbi. oUeo... UIftI.,I. tlte '''''J••tof Ide.tltl • i ..tioa Order HI168. I..oed b, tlte Federal liar... 01 1."..11,,11... I • If'htnd iurtau of JutttsttgattJ1u . j;. IJrparlmrnl of Justin I i I . ~ I.CI . I VOL 4 NO. 10 OCTOBER 1, 1935 I••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• October 1985, Volume 54, Number 10 lP@O~©@ [}(]O@~@[f'W 2 The FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin: Pathway to Professionalism By Thomas J. Deakin © [f' ~0Dil@ @ ~ @ ~ O@~~©@ 10 Blueprint for the Future of the Uniform Crime Reporting Program By Paul A. Zolbe [b @@@O [M] @ ~~ @ [f' @ 13 Search and Seizure Policy: Development and Implementation By Clarke F. Ahlers ©@@~@[f'@~~@[ii) 18 Law Enforcement Coordinating Committees: One District's Experience By Gerald D. Fines and L. Lee Smith ©@@~@[f'@~D@[ii) 21 Sharing Federally Forfeited Property By Rosemary Hart and Laurence E. Fann [b@@@O [Q)o@@@~ 25 Computerized Business Records as Evidence: Required Predicates to Admission By John Gales Sauls 32 Wanted by the FBI l%OOlJ Law Enforcement Bulletin The Cover: Federal Bureau of Investigation Published by the Office of This month's cover illustrates the first issue of the United States Department of Justice Congressional and Public Affairs, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin under this title in Washington, DC 20535 William M.
    [Show full text]
  • Front Matter
    Cecil_J Edgar Hoover & Amer Press 11/19/13 1:39 PM Page v © University Press of Kansas. All rights reserved. Reproduction and distribution prohibited without permission of the Press. CONTENTS List of Illustrations vii Preface ix Introduction 1 1. The FBI’s Ongoing Crisis of Legitimacy 12 2. A Bureau Built for Public Relations 43 3. Enforcing the Bureau’s Image of Restraint 76 4. Silencing a “Useful Citizen” 101 5. Investigating Critics on the Left 124 6. Dividing the Press 156 7. Engaging Defenders in the Press 177 8. Corresponding with Friends in the Press 193 9. Managing Friends in the Broadcast Media 217 10. Renewing the FBI Story in Bureau-Authorized Books 239 11. Building a Television Audience 265 Conclusion 282 Notes 289 Selected Bibliography 339 Index 345 Cecil_J Edgar Hoover & Amer Press 11/19/13 1:39 PM Page vi © University Press of Kansas. All rights reserved. Reproduction and distribution prohibited without permission of the Press. Cecil_J Edgar Hoover & Amer Press 11/19/13 1:39 PM Page vii © University Press of Kansas. All rights reserved. Reproduction and distribution prohibited without permission of the Press. ILLUSTRATIONS 1. Reporters interviewing “Hoover” 7 2. Attorney General A. Mitchell Palmer 17 3. J. Edgar Hoover at his Justice Department desk 20 4. Harlan Fiske Stone 23 5. Louis B. Nichols 29 6. Hoover congratulates assistant director William C. Sullivan 32 7. Columnist and broadcaster Walter Winchell 38 8. President Roosevelt signs into law the Twelve Point Crime Control Program 49 9. Hoover speaks with unidentified reporters 53 10. Washington Star reporter Neil “Rex” Collier fingerprints Hoover 59 11.
    [Show full text]