Buffalo Treehopper

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Pest Profile Photo Credit: Tom Murray, Bugguide.net, Creative Commons License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd-nc/1.0/ Common Name: Buffalo Treehopper Scientific Name: Stictocephala bisonia Order and Family: Hemiptera, Membracidae Size and Appearance: Length (mm) Appearance Egg 1.5mm Pearly white in color. Elongated, slightly curved and rounded at the base and tapered to the opposite end. 6 – 12 eggs are laid in slits on twigs during the months from July to October. These slits, produced by a very sharp ovipositor, will heal over and protect the eggs until late spring. This will cause the branch to look scabby and rough in appearance. Larva/Nymph Start out about Nymphs are green, wingless and 2 mm for the first stage, molting have a spiny appearance. several times and increasing in size to adult stage Adult 6-8mm Bright green to grassy green in color. Page 1 of 2 Triangular shaped pronotum with two prominent points that resemble the head and horns of an American bison. Transparent wings are folded on the sides. Pupa (if applicable) Type of feeder (Chewing, sucking, etc.): Piercing - sucking Host plant/s: Apple, ash, elm, peach, cherry, Black Locust, clovers, goldenrods, asters, and willow. Description of Damage (nymph and adults): Damage occurs to young twigs of trees when slits are made during ovipositing. This scarring will become scabby and is a site for plant pathogens. Depending on the infestation, scarring can weaken or stunt the growth of the small limbs. Honeydew secretions can lead to sooty mold growth on leaves and stems. References: Cranshaw, W. (2004). Garden insects of North America: the ultimate guide to backyard bugs. Princeton University Press. Sorenson, C. J. (1928). Treehopper injury in Utah orchards. UAES Bulletins, 206,(178). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1177&context=uaes_bulletins Page 2 of 2 .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Bulletin No. 206-Treehopper Injury in Utah Orchards
Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU UAES Bulletins Agricultural Experiment Station 6-1928 Bulletin No. 206 - Treehopper Injury in Utah Orchards Charles J. Sorenson Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/uaes_bulletins Part of the Agricultural Science Commons Recommended Citation Sorenson, Charles J., "Bulletin No. 206 - Treehopper Injury in Utah Orchards" (1928). UAES Bulletins. Paper 178. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/uaes_bulletins/178 This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by the Agricultural Experiment Station at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in UAES Bulletins by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Bulletin 2 06 June, 1928 Treehopper Injury in Utah Orchards By CHARLES J. SORENSON 3 Dorsal and side views of the following species of treehoppers: 1. Ceresa bubalus (Fabr.) ( Buffalo treehopper) 2. Stictocephala inermis (Fabr.) 3. Stictocephala gillettei Godg. (x 10 ) UTAH AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION LOGAN. UTAH UTAH AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION , BOARD OF TRUSTEES . ANTHONY W. IVINS, President __ _____ ____________________ __ ___________________ Salt Lake City C. G. ADNEY, Vice-President ____ ___ ________________________________ ________________________ Corinne ROY B ULLEN ________ __________________________ _______ _____ _____ ________ ___ ____ ______ ____ Salt Lake City LORENZO N . STOHL ______ ___ ____ ___ ______________________ __ ___ ______ _____ __________ Salt Lake City MRS. LEE CHARLES MILLER ___ ______ ___ _________ ___ _____ ______ ___ ____ ________ Salt Lake City WE S TON V ERN ON, Sr. ________________________ ___ ____ ____ _____ ___ ____ ______ __ __ _______ ________ Loga n FRANK B. STEPHENS _____ ___ __ ____ ____________ ____ ______________ __ ___________ __.___ Salt Lake City MRS.
[Show full text]
Insects That Feed on Trees and Shrubs
INSECTS THAT FEED ON COLORADO TREES AND SHRUBS1 Whitney Cranshaw David Leatherman Boris Kondratieff Bulletin 506A TABLE OF CONTENTS DEFOLIATORS .................................................... 8 Leaf Feeding Caterpillars .............................................. 8 Cecropia Moth ................................................ 8 Polyphemus Moth ............................................. 9 Nevada Buck Moth ............................................. 9 Pandora Moth ............................................... 10 Io Moth .................................................... 10 Fall Webworm ............................................... 11 Tiger Moth ................................................. 12 American Dagger Moth ......................................... 13 Redhumped Caterpillar ......................................... 13 Achemon Sphinx ............................................. 14 Table 1. Common sphinx moths of Colorado .......................... 14 Douglas-fir Tussock Moth ....................................... 15 1. Whitney Cranshaw, Colorado State University Cooperative Extension etnomologist and associate professor, entomology; David Leatherman, entomologist, Colorado State Forest Service; Boris Kondratieff, associate professor, entomology. 8/93. ©Colorado State University Cooperative Extension. 1994. For more information, contact your county Cooperative Extension office. Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture,
[Show full text]
Research Progress Reports for Pierce's Disease and Other
2019 Research Progress Reports Research Progress Reports Pierce’s Disease and Other Designated Pests and Diseases of Winegrapes - December 2019 - Compiled by: Pierce’s Disease Control Program California Department of Food and Agriculture Sacramento, CA 95814 2019 Research Progress Reports Editor: Thomas Esser, CDFA Cover Design: Sean Veling, CDFA Cover Photograph: Photo by David Köhler on Unsplash Cite as: Research Progress Reports: Pierce’s Disease and Other Designated Pests and Diseases of Winegrapes. December 2019. California Department of Food and Agriculture, Sacramento, CA. Available on the Internet at: https://www.cdfa.ca.gov/pdcp/Research.html Acknowledgements: Many thanks to the scientists and cooperators conducting research on Pierce’s disease and other pests and diseases of winegrapes for submitting reports for inclusion in this document. Note to Readers: The reports in this document have not been peer reviewed. 2019 Research Progress Reports TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1: Xylella fastidiosa and Pierce’s Disease REPORTS • Addressing Knowledge Gaps in Pierce’s Disease Epidemiology: Underappreciated Vectors, Genotypes, and Patterns of Spread Rodrigo P.P. Almeida, Monica L. Cooper, Matt Daugherty, and Rhonda Smith ......................2 • Testing of Grapevines Designed to Block Vector Transmission of Xylella fastidiosa Rodrigo P.P. Almeida ..............................................................................................................11 • Field-Testing Transgenic Grapevine Rootstocks Expressing Chimeric Antimicrobial
[Show full text]
Biodiversity Report
G R E E N V A L L E Y N A T U R E P R E S E R V E Biodiversity Report Submitted by: Amy Bandman & Kathy Wine, River Action, Inc. & Michael Reisner, Upper Mississippi Studies Center Photos by: Tim Gillman & Mik Holgersson Bio-Diversity Day 2013 1 Table of Contents Introduction to Bio-Diversity Day ....................................................................... 3 Participating Scientific Experts ............................................................................. 4 Comprehensive Species Lists ................................................................................ 5 Scientific/Common Names: Plants ................................................................................................... 5 Insects .................................................................................................. 8 Birds ................................................................................................... 10 Amphibians ...................................................................................... 12 Mammals ........................................................................................... 12 Reptiles .............................................................................................. 12 Worms ............................................................................................... 12 Summary of Species ............................................................................................. 13 2 Introduction to Bio-Diversity Day: River Action partnered with The Upper Mississippi
[Show full text]
Ecological Networks of Grassland Plants and Arthropods by Ellen A. R. Welti B.A., Kansas State University, 2012 an ABSTRACT of A
Ecological networks of grassland plants and arthropods by Ellen A. R. Welti B.A., Kansas State University, 2012 AN ABSTRACT OF A DISSERTATION submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Division of Biology College of Arts and Sciences KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2017 Abstract Ecological communities are comprised both of species and their interactions. The importance of species interactions is embraced by ecological network analysis, a framework used to identify non-random patterns in species interactions, and the consequences of these patterns for maintaining species diversity. Here, I investigated environmental drivers of the structure of plant-pollinator and plant-herbivore networks. Specifically, I asked: (1) Do global-scale climate gradients shape mutualistic and antagonistic networks? (2) At a landscape scale (within a 3,487 ha research site), how do contrasting regimes of major grassland disturbances - fire frequency and grazing by bison (Bison bison) - shape plant-pollinator network structure? (3) How do fire and grazing affect plant-grasshopper network structure? And, (4) What is the role of plant species diversity in determining plant-herbivore network structure? At the global scale, variability in temperature was the key climatic factor regulating both antagonistic and mutualistic network structural properties. At the landscape scale, fire and grazing had major consequences for plant-pollinator and plant-herbivore communities. In particular, bison grazing increased network complexity and resistance to species loss for both plant-pollinator and plant-herbivore systems. Results from an experimental grassland restoration that manipulated plant diversity suggest that plant diversity directly affects plant-herbivore structure and increases network stability.
[Show full text]
Insects on Flower
/^^^ Ci-Ut^ 'ff CONTROLLING INSECTS ON FLOWER AGRICULTURE INFORMATION BULLETIN NO. 237 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Insects shown on front covei Top ¡eft, Japanese beetle; t right, cabbage looper; bottc left, rose chafers; bottom right, saddleback caterpillar Aphids ON FLOWERS By Floyd F. Smith, Entomology Research Division, Agricultural Research Service Every year, insects and related pests cost florists and home flower gardeners many millions of dollars in time, labor, and money. Most pests that attack flowering and ornamental-foliage plants can be con- trolled by using insecticides and by following good cultural practices. This bulletin tells how to recognize the more common pests, and sug- gests what can be done to keep them from damaging plants and gardens. It discusses only the insecticides that do not require unusual precautions in handling. CONTENTS Page Page Insects 3 Using insecticide—con. General feeders 3 Sprays 67 Specific feeders 16 Application equipment 69 Beneficial insects 64 Precautions 72 Using insecticide 67 Other control measures 72 Dusts 67 Index 75 HOW TO USE THIS BULLETIN To get maximum benefit measures. Materials used to from this bulletôn^ familiarize combat plant insects, and di- yourself with its arrange- rections for their prepara- ment as indicated in the tion, are also discussed in table of contents. this section. If you know the name of If you encounter insect an insect that is injuring your problems not discussed here, plants, refer to the index write to your county agricul- (p. 75) to find the page on tural agent, to the agricul- which it is discussed. Sug- tural college or experiment gested measures for control station in your State, or to are given at the end of the the U.S.
[Show full text]
Insects-Chinery-81-91.Pdf
MIRID BUGS .& Orthocephalus saltator. Rather hairy. Head not noticeably wider than front of pronotum. Antennae black. Tibiae red or brick~coloured (black in O. coriaceus ). Hind / femora enlarged for jumping, especially in female. Male always fully winged: female > usually brachypterous as illustrated. 6-9 in rough grassland, mainly on composites. .& Orthotylus virescens. 6-9 on broom. Partly predatory. One of many rather similar t f r ,• green bugs in this genus, although rather darker than most. Specific identification is .. ' ,.., difficult in this genus, although host plant is a good guide. The genus may be confused . '/ with some species of Lyglls and Lygocoris, but these genera are generally more robust f-" and they have a distinct collar at the front of the pronotum . t if~ ••r~.,f~,);I:~J'~'\:;i •••• Black-kneed Capsid Blepharidopterus angulatus. Named for the black patches at the ~./'/ /\ .0'[' tips of the tibiae - especia1Jy prominent in the nymphs. Antennae much shorter in i il'// \ j' some males. 6-10 on a wide range of trees, especially apple and lime. Partly predatory, Orthotylus ",' pilophorus \ ' \, virescens destroying large numbers of red spider mites in orchards. perp/exus x 3 .. x3 Pi/ophorus perp/exus. Pale bands are due to silvery hairs. 6-10 on oaks and other f ),-t"acephalus Black-kneed deciduous trees, feeding mainly on aphids and sometimes on leaves and young fruits. ,"ltator x 3 Capsid x 3 Rather active and sometimes mistaken for ants.••. P. cinnarnopterlls is similar but lives on pines. / .... / " / \ ..•. Carnpylonellra virgllia. Bright yellow cuneus with red apex distinguishes this from '\ / \ / several otherwise similar bugs.
[Show full text]
Communities of Canopy-Dwelling Arthropods in Response to Diverse
Published September 20, 2018 Agricultural & Communities of Canopy-Dwelling Environmental Arthropods in Response to Diverse Forages Letters Research Letter Krishna B. Bhandari,* C. P. West, and S. D. Longing Core Ideas • True bugs, grasshoppers, and spiders were Abstract: ‘WW-B.Dahl’ old world bluestem (OWB) [Bothriochloa bladhii (Retz) S.T. among the more abundant canopy arthropods Blake] is an important warm-season perennial grass pasture in semiarid western in pastures. Texas. This grass deters pestiferous ants; however, its effect on canopy-dwelling insects is not documented. The abundance of canopy-dwelling arthropods • Old world bluestem had among the least among OWB, OWB–alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.), alfalfa, and native grass pastures abundance of canopy arthropods in 2 out of 3 was compared by sweep-net sampling over 3 yr (2014–2016). Forty-six families yr. of nine insect orders and a single family of spider (Araneae: Araneidae) were • Old world bluestem provides a less favorable identified. Among total individuals, 85% were insects and 15% were spiders. habitat than alfalfa for canopy insects. Housefly (Musca spp., Diptera: Muscidae), potato leafhopper (Empoasca spp., Hemiptera: Cicadellidae), lygus bug (Lygus hesperus, Hemiptera: Miridae), and spur-throated grasshopper (Melanoplus spp., Orthoptera: Acrididae) were other abundant taxa. Among the insects collected, spur-throated grasshoppers were the most abundant, comprising 12% of total taxa. Alfalfa hosted the greatest number of total insects, including pests such as potato leafhopper and lygus bug. Lower abundances of pestiferous insects were found in OWB while still hosting greater abundances of some arthropods of ecological significance such as spider and ladybird beetle (Hippodamia spp., Coleoptera: Coccinellidae).
[Show full text]
Entomological News
MORE ABOUT THE BUFFALO TREEHOPPER ON A MISSISSIPPI RIVER ISLAND (HOMOPTERA:MEMBRACIDAE) Clifford J. Dennis 1 I have previously reported (1969a, 1969b) on treehoppers col- lected on certain Mississippi River islands during 1967, 1968, and 1969. In the intervening years nothing new was discovered until July 14, 1973, when a single adult male of the buffalo treehopper, Stictocephala bubalus (Fabricius), was seen on cottonwood (Popu- lus deltoides} on Hovie Island at about mile 623 on the Corps of Engineers navigation chart. I had never found this species on cottonwood, and I am aware of few past records. Marlatt (1894) mentioned egg-laying scars on cottonwood (Populus monilifera). Funkhouser (1917) reported cottonwood (Populus deltoides) as a host. I have no idea what the insect was doing on the cottonwood. I could only speculate. It hopped from a small tree onto my arm. After I released him, he flew off into the trees. No other specimens were found. 'Professor of Biology, University of Wisconsin-Whitewater, Whitewater, Wisconsin 53190. 29 Ent News, 85:29-30, 1974 30 Ent. News, Vol. 85, January 1974 LITERATURE CITED Dennis, Clifford J. 1969a. Treehoppers of certain Mississippi River islands (Homoptera, Membracidae). Entomol. News 80(2):32:33. 1969b. The buffalo treehopper on a Mississippi River island (Homoptera, Membracidae). Entomol. News 80(12):328. Funkhouser, W. D. 1917. Biology of the Membracidae of the Cayuga Lake basin. Mem. Cornell University Agr. Exp. Sta. 2:177-445. Marlatt, C. L. 1894. The buffalo treehopper (Ceresa bubalus Fab.). Insect Life 7:8-14. ABSTRACT.-MORE ABOUT THE BUFFALO TREEHOPPER ON A MISSISSIPPI RIVER ISLAND (HOMOPTERA:MEMBRACIDAE).-This paper reports the finding of the buffalo treehopper on an unusual plant on a new island.
[Show full text]
IIIIIIIIIIIIII|Liiiiliiiii
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I | l I I I I l I I I I I 1 .J ORDER LAE’th Thysanura Dermaptera Collembola Coleoptera Orthoptera Coleoptera (Continued) 15°13‘31“a Strepsiptera Neuroptera Mecoptera Ephemeroptera Trichoptera Odonata Lepidoptera Plecoptera Lepidoptera (Continued) Psocoptera Lepidoptera Mall0phag3 (Continued) Di tera Thysanoptera p Siphonaptera Anoplura Hymenoptera Hemiptera Homoptera r..-___-_-___-_-_-___________-______-__-___._____..___-_.. L______._______.________________.__--_____.__.___.__-_____.._-_ These order names may be cut out and used in the display cases, as shown on page 5. 4-H ENTOMULOGYI INTRODUCTION The study of insects is a science called entomology. Insects are small animals and are abundant everywhere. Over 1,000,000 different insects have been described and named in the world. In North Carolina we have over 15,000 different kinds or species of insects that have been collected. Insects, being small animals, have served science well in the ﬁelds of genetics and aerospace biology. Some insects, such as the honeybee, have contributed much to our world economy through the polli- nation of wild and cultivated crops and the production of honey and bees wax. The silk worm created a whole industry for many years because of its production of silk. There are also thousands of insects which may prove beneﬁcial under certain conditions through their attacks as parasites and predators on other insects. We are aware of the damage of insects, which is in the billions of dollars, to our homes, food, cloth— ing and health.
[Show full text]
Specimen Study List
SPECIMEN STUDY LIST -- Insect Identification Contest, Nebraska State Fair Superintendent -- Jim Kalisch, UNL Entomology Department, Lincoln Order Name Order Members No. Common Name Scientific Name BLATTODEA Cockroaches 1 German Cockroach Blattella germanica 2 Oriental Cockroach Blatta orientalis 3 Pennsylvania Wood Cockroach Parcoblatta pennsylvanica COLEOPTERA Beetles 1 Colorado Potato Beetle Leptinotarsa decemlineata 2 Cottonwood Borer Beetle Plectrodera scalator 3 Dogbane Leaf Beetle Chrysochus auratus 4 Eastern Firefly Photinus pyralis 5 Emerald Ash Borer Agrilus planipennis 6 Fiery Hunter Ground Beetle Calosoma scrutator 7 Green June Beetle Cotinis nitida 8 Japanese Beetle Popillia japonica 9 Masked Chafer Cyclocephala sp. 10 Multicolored Asian Lady Beetle Harmonia axyridis 11 Rhubarb Curculio Lixus concavus 12 Soldier Beetle Chauliognathus sp. 13 Water Scavenger Beetle Hydrophilus triangularis COLLEMBOLA Springtails 1 Longbodied Springtail Entomobrya sp. DERMAPTERA Earwigs 1 European Earwig Forficula auricularia DIPTERA Flies 1 Black Horse Fly Tabanus atratus 2 Crane Fly Tipula sp. 3 Flesh Fly Sarcophaga sp. 4 Green Bottle Fly Lucilia (Phaenicia) sericata 5 Longlegged Fly Condylostylus sp. 6 Mosquito Culex sp. 7 Mydas Fly Mydas clavatus 8 Picturewinged Fly Delphinia picta 9 Robber Fly Diogmites sp. 10 Syrphid (Hover) Fly Syrphus ribesii EPHEMEROPTERA Mayflies 1 Giant Mayfly Hexagenia sp. HEMIPTERA Cicadas, 1 Buffalo Treehopper Stictocephala bisonia (Suborder Leafhoppers, Auchenorrhyncha) Treehoppers, Planthoppers, Spittlebugs 2
[Show full text]
5.3 Crop Protection
5 Crop Protection 5.3 Insect & Mite Pests of Grape Revised February, 2015 D. Thomas Lowery, AAFC-PARC, Summerland Biological Control of Insects and (Graphics by Robyn DeYoung) Mites Insect and mite pests of grapes are attacked by Fewer insect and mite pests attack grapes grown many species of beneficial organisms, including in British Columbia compared with many other bacterial and viral diseases, spiders, insect major grape producing regions, which allows for predators, predacious mites, and vertebrates a ‘softer’ approach to pest management that such as toads and birds. Maintaining and preserves beneficial insects and predacious enhancing numbers of these natural ene- mites that help regulate secondary pests such as mies of grape pests forms the cornerstone of spider mites and grape mealybug. Adoption of a successful IPM program. Healthy popula- integrated pest management (IPM) practic- tions of predators and parasites prevent es that minimize the use of chemical sprays outbreaks of secondary pests and reduce the can also help reduce production costs, numbers of sprays required for the control of reduce human exposure to insecticides, and primary pests such as leafhoppers and climbing preserve the local environment. Insect and Mite cutworm. Pests of Grape in British Columbia (Lowery et al., 2014), a companion publication contains colour Beneficial organisms can be preserved or photographs of many of the pests outlined in enhanced in several ways. The negative impact this chapter of the production guide. In the of pesticides can be minimized by spraying only following descriptions of grapevine pests, when and where required. Monitoring of pest numbers and letters indicated in parentheses numbers will often indicate that only a small refer to the pages and plates of the correspond- portion of a vineyard requires chemical treat- ing photo guide.
[Show full text]