DOCSLIB.ORG

Introduction Potential of Non-Indigenous Freshwater Crayfish in Greece Via the Aquarium Trade

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Introduction Potential of Non-Indigenous Freshwater Crayfish in Greece Via the Aquarium Trade Cent. Eur. J. Biol. • 9(1) • 2014 • 11-18 DOI: 10.2478/s11535-013-0120-6 Central European Journal of Biology Enemy at the gates: introduction potential of non-indigenous freshwater crayfish in Greece via the aquarium trade Research Article Irene Papavlasopoulou1, Costas Perdikaris2,*, Leonidas Vardakas3, Ioannis Paschos4 1Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Thessaly and Department of Aquaculture & Fisheries, Technological Educational Institute of Epirus, 43100 Karditsa, Greece 2Department of Fisheries, Regional Unit of Thesprotia, Region of Epirus, 46100 Igoumenitsa, Greece 3Institute of Inland Waters, Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, 19013 Anavissos, Greece 4Department of Aquaculture & Fisheries, Technological Educational Institute of Epirus, 46100 Igoumenitsa, Greece Received 11 May 2012; Accepted 23 October 2012 Abstract: Indigenousfreshwater crayfish species (ICS) are important biodiversity components and desirable fishery targets. However,ICS populationsareincreasinglythreatenedbyvariousanthropogenicstressors.Moreover,establishedpopulationsofnon-indigenous freshwatercrayfishspecies(NICS)andnew‘waves’ofNICSintroductionsexertsignificantpressureonICSpopulationsatapan- Europeanlevel.Theseeffectsincludedirectcompetitionforspaceandresourcesaswellascrayfish‘plague’transmissionfrom introduced North American species. Given low public knowledge of this problematic, considerable risk of future introductions exist as a result of conventional and internet-based aquarium trade, which often lead to deliberate and/or accidental releases of NICS into the wild. In 2011, we conducted a survey of freshwater crayfish species in eleven large-size pet shops located in three major cities and in three large internet-based aquarium companies in Greece. Overall, eight species belonging to three genera (Procambarus, Cherax and Cambarellus) were recorded, originating from the USA, Australia, New Guinea and Mexico. The invasion potential of the three most popular species was assessed using the Freshwater Invertebrate Invasiveness Scoring Kit (FI-ISK). Two species were determined to constitute a ‘very high risk’ of invasion. As such, regulatory measures need to be implemented to monitor the ornamental trade of NICS in Greece and a national framework developed for protecting ICS. Keywords: Aquarium trade • Biodiversity • FI-ISK • Non-indigenous freshwater crayfish ©VersitaSp.zo.o. 1. Introduction eutrophication and overexploitation [1]. Furthermore, increasing information on NICS introductions into European Several populations of indigenous freshwater crayfish freshwaters [2] indicates a serious risk of extinction for species (ICS) in Europe are at risk of becoming local populations in the near future through both direct endangered or extinct as a result of various anthropogenic (e.g. predation and crayfish ‘plague’) and indirect effects stressors such as the crayfish ‘plague’ disease, other (e.g. grazing of aquatic macrophytes, alteration of diseases, competition with invasive non-indigenous biomass and species richness of macroinvertebrates, crayfish species (NICS), translocations of both ICS and bank erosion and substrate disturbance) [3]. The latter NICS, loss of genetic diversity, pollution, water abstraction could exert dramatic changes to the biodiversity of aquatic for irrigation and direct human use, habitat destruction, communities and the integrity of ecosystems in Europe. * E-mail: [email protected] 11 Enemy at the gates: introduction potential of non-indigenous freshwater crayfish in Greece via the aquarium trade Recent efforts to review and record historical and (FI-ISK) tool developed by the Centre for Environment current occurrences of ICS in Greece [4-6] showed Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (CEFAS) that crayfish populations are present in at least 34 (http://cefas.defra.gov.uk/our-science/ecosystems-and- hydrographic systems (natural and man-made lakes, biodiversity/non-native-species/decision-support-tools. rivers and small streams). However, the distribution aspx) to assess the invasion potential of the three most of crayfish is much more restricted nowadays than popular aquarium species (Procambarus clarkii, Cherax in previous decades, and many populations of ICS destructor and Cherax quadricarinatus). The same tool are isolated and confined to headwaters and lentic was also applied to ICS and NICS in Greek freshwaters environments that remain pristine [4]. Although there systems for comparison purposes. is only one established population of invasive NICS (i.e. signal crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus (Dana, 1852)), ICS (noble crayfish Astacus astacus (L.), 3. Results narrowclawed crayfish Astacus leptodactylus Eschscholtz 1823, stone crayfish Austropotamobius Overall, we recorded eight species of NICS belonging torrentium (Schrank, 1803)) and their habitats are to three genera (Table 1). Available data for four species confronted to serious threats due to human-mediated (Procambarus clarkii, Cherax quardicarinatus, Cherax stressors. These threats are expected to be exacerbated peknyi and Cambarellus patzcuarensis) suggested that by globalization leading to increased trade and they were imported from Singapore. C. quardicarinatus e-commerce of NICS, unrestricted movement/travelling may also have been imported from an alternative of NICS, intense economic activity, demographic location in Italy. The species most advertised for sale in pressures [7,8] and climate change, which generally the e-commerce were P. clarkii and C. quadricarinatus. favour NICS with less strict ecological preferences and The FI-ISK revealed that invasion potential was increased adaptive ability compared to ICS [3]. Recently, particularly high for P. clarkii and C. destructor. The astacologists have determined that the aquarium trade analysis rejected these species for introduction in is as one of the most important and plausible sources of the aquarium trade based on a 16 points threshold. NICS introductions in Europe and worldwide. However C. quadricarinatus had moderate score, requiring data on the Hellenic aquarium trade of NICS is lacking. further assessment for introduction. The FI-ISK scores So far, aquatic ecologists have focused on studying are presented in Figure 1 against: (a) the scores for the and managing ecosystems already invaded and three ICS and the only NICS established in Greece; and degraded by non-indigenous species. Precautionary (b) the scores generated by Tricarico et al. [9] for the measures are urgently needed for mitigating further same species in Italy. Accurate scoring for C. peknyi, introductions of non-indigenous species, one of the P. alleni, C. shufeldtii, C. montezuma and most important threats to biodiversity worldwide. Here, C. patzcuarensis was not possible due to the limited our objective was to record the presence of ornamental bibliographic data on their biology and invasion ecology. NICS in the Greek aquarium trade market and assess their invasion potential into the wild. 4. Discussion 2. Experimental Procedures European ICS populations have suffered from serious declines during the last century, mainly due to the spread We recorded the presence of NICS in eleven large- of the crayfish ‘plague’ diseasevia introduced American size aquarium stores in Greece’s two largest cities species. All crayfish of Northern and Central American (Athens and Thessaloniki) and one large provincial origin, such as species from the genera Pacifastacus, city (Ioannina) between January and December 2011. Procambarus, Cambarellus and Orconectes are We also conducted an online-based research of three suspected vectors of crayfish ‘plague’. Freshwater major internet-based companies with stores in the crayfish are particularly good invaders compared to Greek pet market simultaneously. Data on the number other groups of aquatic organisms. Currently, ten of sales per store were not available. However, we NICS are established in the European freshwaters anecdotally recorded that nine specimens of the most with establishment success record approaching 100%, ornamental and large-size C. quardicarinatus were compared to the number of introduced species to the wild sold during 2011 in one store in the city of Ioannina [10]. Although NICS are still absent from neighbouring with a population of 100,000 inhabitants. We used the countries to Greece (i.e., Albania, the former Yugoslav Freshwater Invertebrate Invasiveness Scoring Kit, v1.19 Republic of Macedonia, Bulgaria, and Turkey) [2,5], 12 I. Papavlasopoulou I. Papavlasopoulou Common Native Documented/ Species Authority Abbreviation Basic biological features Habitat preferences Source name origin possible impacts Very highly invasive ability, Reproduction >10°C, temperature carrier of the ‘plague’, tolerant ≤35ºC (best growth: 22-30ºC), competition with ICS for space Lentic including saline et al. r-selected, breeding capacity over 600 and resources, structural waters (swamps, eggs, rapid growth, life span: changes in food webs, marshes seasonally Procambarus Red swamp S.E United 4 years, max length: 15 cm TL, tolerant predation, bioaccumulation, Girard, 1852 PCC flooded wetlands, [3,20,25,26] clarkii crayfish States of brackish water (12 psu) and adverse elimination/reduction of slow flowing water, environmental conditions (e.g. lower abundance and richness of reservoirs, irrigation dissolved oxygen lethal limit of indigenous species, damages systems, rice fields). 0.4 mg/L), burrowing ability, to agricultural crops, ditches omnivorous-polytrophic. and river banks, increased
Load more

Recommended publications
  • New Alien Crayfish Species in Central Europe
    NEW ALIEN CRAYFISH SPECIES IN CENTRAL EUROPE Introduction pathways, life histories, and ecological impacts DISSERTATION zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades Dr. rer. nat. der Fakultät für Naturwissenschaften der Universität Ulm vorgelegt von Christoph Chucholl aus Rosenheim Ulm 2012 NEW ALIEN CRAYFISH SPECIES IN CENTRAL EUROPE Introduction pathways, life histories, and ecological impacts DISSERTATION zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades Dr. rer. nat. der Fakultät für Naturwissenschaften der Universität Ulm vorgelegt von Christoph Chucholl aus Rosenheim Ulm 2012 Amtierender Dekan: Prof. Dr. Axel Groß Erstgutachter: Prof. Dr. Manfred Ayasse Zweitgutachter: Prof. apl. Dr. Gerhard Maier Tag der Prüfung: 16.7.2012 Cover picture: Orconectes immunis male (blue color morph) (photo courtesy of Dr. H. Bellmann) Table of contents Part 1 – Summary Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1 Invasive alien species – a global menace ....................................................................... 1 “Invasive” matters .......................................................................................................... 2 Crustaceans – successful invaders .................................................................................. 4 The case of alien crayfish in Europe .............................................................................. 5 New versus Old alien crayfish .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Decapoda: Cambaridae) of Arkansas Henry W
    Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science Volume 71 Article 9 2017 An Annotated Checklist of the Crayfishes (Decapoda: Cambaridae) of Arkansas Henry W. Robison Retired, [email protected] Keith A. Crandall George Washington University, [email protected] Chris T. McAllister Eastern Oklahoma State College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas Part of the Biology Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Robison, Henry W.; Crandall, Keith A.; and McAllister, Chris T. (2017) "An Annotated Checklist of the Crayfishes (Decapoda: Cambaridae) of Arkansas," Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science: Vol. 71 , Article 9. Available at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol71/iss1/9 This article is available for use under the Creative Commons license: Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). Users are able to read, download, copy, print, distribute, search, link to the full texts of these articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. An Annotated Checklist of the Crayfishes (Decapoda: Cambaridae) of Arkansas Cover Page Footnote Our deepest thanks go to HWR’s numerous former SAU students who traveled with him in search of crayfishes on many fieldtrips throughout Arkansas from 1971 to 2008. Personnel especially integral to this study were C.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S
    Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 4—An Update April 2013 Prepared by: Pam L. Fuller, Amy J. Benson, and Matthew J. Cannister U.S. Geological Survey Southeast Ecological Science Center Gainesville, Florida Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia Cover Photos: Silver Carp, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix – Auburn University Giant Applesnail, Pomacea maculata – David Knott Straightedge Crayfish, Procambarus hayi – U.S. Forest Service i Table of Contents Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................ v List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................ vi INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Overview of Region 4 Introductions Since 2000 ....................................................................................... 1 Format of Species Accounts ...................................................................................................................... 2 Explanation of Maps ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Hoosier- Shawnee Ecological Assessment Area
    United States Department of Agriculture The Hoosier- Forest Service Shawnee Ecological North Central Assessment Research Station General Frank R. Thompson, III, Editor Technical Report NC-244 Thompson, Frank R., III, ed 2004. The Hoosier-Shawnee Ecological Assessment. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-244. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Research Station. 267 p. This report is a scientific assessment of the characteristic composition, structure, and processes of ecosystems in the southern one-third of Illinois and Indiana and a small part of western Kentucky. It includes chapters on ecological sections and soils, water resources, forest, plants and communities, aquatic animals, terrestrial animals, forest diseases and pests, and exotic animals. The information presented provides a context for land and resource management planning on the Hoosier and Shawnee National Forests. ––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Key Words: crayfish, current conditions, communities, exotics, fish, forests, Hoosier National Forest, mussels, plants, Shawnee National Forest, soils, water resources, wildlife. Cover photograph: Camel Rock in Garden of the Gods Recreation Area, with Shawnee Hills and Garden of the Gods Wilderness in the back- ground, Shawnee National Forest, Illinois. Contents Preface....................................................................................................................... II North Central Research Station USDA Forest Service Acknowledgments ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Swamp Dwarf Crayfish (Cambarellus Puer) Ecological Risk Screening Summary
    Swamp Dwarf Crayfish (Cambarellus puer) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, April 2014 Revised, December 2017 Web Version, 7/5/2018 Photo: corvid81. Licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC). Available: https://www.inaturalist.org/photos/7107944. (December 2017). 1 Native Range, and Status in the United States Native Range From Alvarez et al. (2010): “This species is known from Brazos and Brazoria counties, Texas, eastward through the coastal plain to the Mississippi basin and from the lower part of the delta to Johnson County, Illinois (Taylor et al. 2004, Fetzner 2008, Burr and Hobbs 1984, Hobbs 1990). In addition, this species is a native of the Mississippi River lowlands in Missouri (B. DiStefano pers. comm. 2010).” 1 Status in the United States From Morehouse and Tobler (2013): “Cambarellus puer occurs from southern Illinois and Missouri southward along the Mississippi River to Louisiana and westward to southeastern Oklahoma and eastern Texas. Current records indicate a very limited distribution in Oklahoma. It is known from a single location: a swampy area with dense vegetation along the Little River in McCurtain County. […] This species has not been collected in Oklahoma since 1975.” Faulkes (2015a) reports that C. puer is not found in the pet trade in the United States, citing Faulkes (2015b). Means of Introductions in the United States This species has not been reported as introduced outside of its native range in the United States. Remarks From NatureServe (2017): “Some populations now in nw LA
    [Show full text]
  • Procambarus Fallax F. Virginalis) Are the Most Popular Crayfish in the North American Pet Trade
    Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems (2015) 416, 20 Knowledge & c Z. Faulkes, published by EDP Sciences, 2015 Management of DOI: 10.1051/kmae/2015016 Aquatic Ecosystems www.kmae-journal.org Journal fully supported by Onema Marmorkrebs (Procambarus fallax f. virginalis) are the most popular crayfish in the North American pet trade Z. Faulkes(1), Received January 15, 2015 Revised May 30, 2015 Accepted June 25, 2015 ABSTRACT Key-words: Introductions of non-native crayfish around the world are increasingly tied Marbled to the distribution, sale, and eventual release of pet crayfish. As part of crayfish, risk assessment for the introduction of non-native crayfish in North Amer- pet trade, ica, I monitored the sale of crayfish on an auction website that special- Marmorkrebs, izes in aquatic pets and aquarium supplies for a year. Three species Cambarellus accounted for the majority of sales: the parthenogenetic crayfish, Mar- morkrebs (Procambarus fallax f. virginalis), the Cajun dwarf crayfish (Cam- barellus shufeldtii), and the orange morph of the endangered Mexican dwarf crayfish (Cambarellus patzcuarensis). Almost half of individual cray- fish sold (48.5%) were Marmorkrebs, which is more than twice as many as C. shufeldtii, the second most commonly sold species. The Louisiana red swamp crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) was often offered for auction, but was bought much less often than the other three species. About 11% of P. c lar k ii auctions were successful, while more than 45% of auctions were successful for the other three. Four Cherax species were the only crayfish sold online whose native range was outside North America.
    [Show full text]
  • Cajun Dwarf Crawfish (Cambrellus Shufeldtii): an Intermediate Host for Southwellina Dimorpha (Acanthocephala) Dennis J
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by ScholarWorks@UARK Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science Volume 60 Article 34 2006 Cajun Dwarf Crawfish (Cambrellus shufeldtii): An Intermediate Host for Southwellina dimorpha (Acanthocephala) Dennis J. Richardson Quinnipiac University, [email protected] William F. Font Southeastern Louisiana University Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas Part of the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Richardson, Dennis J. and Font, William F. (2006) "Cajun Dwarf Crawfish (Cambrellus shufeldtii): An Intermediate Host for Southwellina dimorpha (Acanthocephala)," Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science: Vol. 60 , Article 34. Available at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol60/iss1/34 This article is available for use under the Creative Commons license: Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). Users are able to read, download, copy, print, distribute, search, link to the full texts of these articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This General Note is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 60 [2006], Art. 34 AnIntermediate Host for Southwellina dimorpha (Acanthocephala) ' Dennis J. Richardson and William F. Font Quinnipiac University, EC-Bio, 275 Mt.Carmel Avenue, Hamden, CT06518 Department ofBiologicalSciences, Southeastern Louisiana University, Hammond, LA 70402 3 Correspondence: [email protected] Southwellina dimorpha Schmidt, 1973 (Polymorphidae: reported from crawfish (Evans et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Www JBL Krebse + Garnelen Korr..Indd
    BROCHUREJBL9 What - Why - How ? Crustacea and shrimp in freshwater aquarium JBL JBL 2 3 Contents Page Preliminary note ............................................................. 3 Preconditions .................................................................. 4 Equipping the aquarium ................................................. 4 The right water ............................................................... 6 Food .............................................................................. 8 Care ............................................................................... 9 Communities ................................................................. 10 Overview of species - shrimp Dwarf shrimp ................................................................ 11 Fan shrimp ..................................................................... 12 Large-clawed shrimp ...................................................... 13 Overview of species - crustaceans Dwarf crayfish ................................................................ 14 Large American crayfish ................................................. 15 Cherax from Australia and Papua New Guinea .............. 18 Photo overview: Dwarf shrimp ................................................................ 20 PRELIMINARY NOTE Large-clawed shrimp ...................................................... 23 Fan shrimp ..................................................................... 23 Dwarf crayfish ................................................................ 24
    [Show full text]
  • CRAWFISH of MISSISSIPPI1 April 4, 2008 Family Cambaridae Hobbs
    CRAWFISH OF MISSISSIPPI1 April 4, 2008 Family Cambaridae Hobbs, 1942 Subfamily Cambarellinae Laguarda, 1961 Genus Cambarellus Ortmann, 1905 Subgenus Dirigicambarus Fitzpatrick, 1983 Cambarellus shufeldtii (Faxon, 1884)* - Cajun Dwarf Crayfish Subgenus Pandicambarus Fitzpatrick, 1983 Cambarellus diminutus Hobbs, 1945* - Least Crayfish Cambarellus lesliei Fitzpatrick and Laning, 1976* - Angular Dwarf Crayfish Cambarellus puer Hobbs, 1945 - Swamp Dwarf Crawfish Subfamily Cambarinae Hobbs, 1942 Genus Cambarus Erichson, 1846 Subgenus Depressicambarus Hobbs, 1969 Cambarus striatus Hay, 1902* - Ambiguous Crayfish Subgenus Lacunicambarus Hobbs, 1969 Cambarus diogenes Girard, 1852* - Devil Crayfish Cambarus sp., ref.: diogenes -UNDESCRIBED SPECIES Cambarus ludovicianus Faxon, 1885* - Painted Devil Crayfish Cambarus sp., ref.: ludovicianus - UNDESCRIBED SPECIES Subgenus Tubericambarus Jezerinac, 1993 Cambarus sp. A* - UNDESCRIBED SPECIES Genus Fallicambarus Hobbs, 1969 Subgenus Creaserinus Hobbs, 1973 Fallicambarus burrisi Fitzpatrick 1987* - Burrowing Bog Crayfish Fallicambarus sp., ref.: burrisi - UNDESCRIBED SPECIES Fallicambarus byersi (Hobbs, 1941)* - Lavender Burrowing Crayfish Fallicambarus danielae Hobbs, 1975* - Speckled Burrowing Crayfish Fallicambarus fodiens (Cottle, 1863)* - Digger Crayfish Fallicambarus gordoni Fitzpatrick 1987* - Camp Shelby Burrowing Crayfish Fallicambarus oryktes (Penn & Marlow, 1959)* - Flatwoods Digger Genus Faxonella Creaser, 1933 Faxonella clypeata (Hay, 1899)* - Ditch Fencing Crayfish Genus Hobbseus Fitzpatrick
    [Show full text]
  • Crustacea and Shrimp in the Freshwater Aquarium JBL 2
    BROCHUREJBL9 What - Why - How ? Crustacea and shrimp in the freshwater aquarium JBL 2 Contents Page Preliminary note ............................................................. 3 Preconditions .................................................................. 4 Equipping the aquarium ................................................. 4 The right water ............................................................... 6 Food ............................................................................ 10 Care ............................................................................. 11 Communities ................................................................. 12 Overview of species - shrimp Dwarf shrimp ................................................................ 13 Fan shrimp ..................................................................... 14 Large-clawed shrimp ...................................................... 15 Overview of species - crustaceans Dwarf crayfish ............................................................... 16 Large American crayfish ................................................. 17 Cherax from Australia and Papua New Guinea .............. 18 Crab .............................................................................. 22 Photo overview: Dwarf shrimp ................................................................ 24 Fan shrimp ..................................................................... 26 Large-clawed shrimp ...................................................... 27 Dwarf crayfish
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation
    CONSERVATION ecapod crustaceans in the families Astacidae, recreational and commercial bait fisheries, and serve as a Cambaridae, and Parastacidae, commonly known profitable and popular food resource. Crayfishes often make as crayfishes or crawfishes, are native inhabitants up a large proportion of the biomass produced in aquatic of freshwater ecosystems on every continent systems (Rabeni 1992; Griffith et al. 1994). In streams, sport except Africa and Antarctica. Although nearly worldwide fishes such as sunfishes and basses (family Centrarchidae) in distribution, crayfishes exhibit the highest diversity in may consume up to two-thirds of the annual production of North America north of Mexico with 338 recognized taxa crayfishes, and as such, crayfishes often comprise critical (308 species and 30 subspecies). Mirroring continental pat- food resources for these fishes (Probst et al. 1984; Roell and terns of freshwater fishes (Warren and Burr 1994) and fresh- Orth 1993). Crayfishes also contribute to the maintenance of water mussels (J. D. Williams et al. 1993), the southeastern food webs by processing vegetation and leaf litter (Huryn United States harbors the highest number of crayfish species. and Wallace 1987; Griffith et al. 1994), which increases avail- Crayfishes are a significant component of aquatic ecosys- ability of nutrients and organic matter to other organisms. tems. They facilitate important ecological processes, sustain In some rivers, bait fisheries for crayfishes constitute an Christopher A. Taylor and Melvin L. Warren, Jr. are cochairs of the Crayfish Subcommittee of the AFS Endangered Species Committee. They can be contacted at the Illinois Natural History Survey, Center for Biodiversity, 607 E. Peabody Drive, Champaign, IL 61820, and U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Monitoring Methods for Crayfish Populations
    DEVELOPMENT OF MONITORING METHODS FOR CRAYFISH POPULATIONS BY BRYAN S. ENGELBERT THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2013 Urbana, Illinois Master’s Committee: Assistant Professor Christopher Taylor, Chair, Director of Research Associate Professor Robert Schooley Associate Professor Yong Cao Resource Scientist Robert DiStefano, Missouri Department of Conservation ABSTRACT Standardized sampling methods for assessing the community structure and health of stream fisheries, freshwater mussels, and insects have been used for several decades. However, such methods are woefully lacking for crayfish. The research of this project involved evaluation of several methods for assessing crayfish populations. The first study (Chapter 2) aims to create standardized, robust sampling methods for assessing stream-dwelling crayfish assemblages and densities in riffle habitats at individual sites located in Missouri. Timed search sampling was used to capture all species present and assess crayfish relative abundance for each site, and quantitative kick seining was used to assess crayfish mean density (number per m2) in riffle habitats. Number of samples required for species richness estimation was analyzed by a resampling our timed search data (without replacement) to illustrate species accumulation at a site scale. Number of samples required for crayfish mean density estimation (relative to the crayfish mean population density) in riffle habitats was assessed by applying a standard deviation-based method to our sample pool from each site. By varying combinations of statistical rigor (percentage of species captured and confidence level), researchers can assess the advantages and disadvantages of alternative sampling effort scenarios.
    [Show full text]