DOCSLIB.ORG

LTS Modelling to Inform Work on the Mayor's Transport Strategy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
LTS Modelling to Inform Work on the Mayor's Transport Strategy LTS Modelling to inform work on the Mayor's Transport Strategy Prepared for Transport for London November 2001 Document Control Project Title: LTS Modelling to inform work on the Mayor's Transport Strategy MVA Project Number: C3895022 WP Reference: cmp\tm Directory & File Name: l:\london\lts\c8950.22\summary\mtsnote.doc Document Approval Primary Author: Richard Stanley Other Author(s): Reviewer(s): Paul Hanson (MVA) Henry Abraham (GLA) Issue Date Distribution Comments 1 16/11/01 THu, HAb, PHa First Draft for Review 2 23/11/01 THu, HAb Second Draft 3 26/11/01 HAb Published Version Contents Chapter Page 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Overview 1 1.2 Objectives of the Study 1 1.3 Structure of this Note 1 2 Modelling Approach 3 2.1 Background to the LTS Model 3 2.2 Modelling Goods Vehicles 5 2.3 Modelling Public Transport Reliability 5 2.4 Modelling Public Transport Crowding: LTS Crowding factors 5 2.5 PiXC as used in the Rail Industry 6 2.6 PiXC as used in the LTS model 7 3 Planning Data Assumptions 8 3.1 Introduction 8 3.2 B2.11 Borough Level Planning Data 8 4 Transport Network Assumptions 14 4.1 Scenarios 14 4.2 2001 Reference Case Scenario 14 4.3 2011 Reference Case Scenario 14 4.4 2011 Test MTS (Mayor's Transport Strategy) Package 16 4.5 2011 Test MTS Package - Road-Based Improvements 16 4.6 2011 Test MTS Package - Radial Rail Infrastructure Improvements 17 4.7 2011 Test MTS Package - Orbital Rail Infrastructure Improvements 17 4.8 2011 Test MTS Package - Underground Service Improvements 18 4.9 2011 Test MTS Package - DLR Improvements 19 4.10 2011 Test MTS Package - New Intermediate Mode Services 19 4.11 2011 Test MTS Package - London Bus Measures 20 5 Model Forecast Summary Statistics 21 5.1 Introduction 21 5.2 2011 Reference Compared to 2001 Reference 22 5.3 2011 Test MTS Compared to 2011 Reference 27 Tables and Figures Figure 2.1 Schematic Representation of the LTS Model 3 Figure 3.1 Change in B2.11 Population from 2001 to 201 12 Figure 3.2 Change in B2.11 Number of Households from 2001 to 201 13 Figure 4.1 2001 Reference TLRN Road Network 14 Table 2.1 National Rail Stock Types and Seat/Standing Capacities 7 Table 3.1 B2.11 Population (over age of 4 years old 10 Table 3.2 B2.11 Households 11 Table 4.1 2011 Reference National Rail CTRL services 15 Table 4.2 2011 Reference National Rail Rolling Stock Capacity Changes 15 Table 4.3 2011 Test MTS ELL and OrbiRail Features 17 Table 4.4 2011 Test MTS Underground Service Improvements 18 Table 5.1 2011 Ref cf. 2001: 24 Hour (Cost Dependent) Trips by Mode 24 Table 5.2 2011 Ref cf. 2001: MP Period Trips by Mode (3 Hour Total) 24 Table 5.3 2011 Ref cf. 2001: MP Period Car Statistics (Average Hour) 24 Table 5.4 2011 Ref cf. 2001: MP Period Vehicle Statistics (Average Hour) 25 Table 5.5 2011 Ref cf. 2001: MP Period PT Statistics (3 Hour total) 26 Table 5.6 2011 MTS cf. 2011 Ref: 24 Hour (Cost Dependent) Trips by Mode 29 Table 5.7 2011 MTS cf. 2011 Ref: MP Period Trips by Mode (3 Hour Total) 29 Table 5.8 2011 MTS cf. 2011 Ref: MP Period Car Statistics (Average Hour) 29 Table 5.9 2011 MTS cf. 2011 Ref: MP Period Vehicle Statistics (Average Hour) 30 Table 5.10 2011 MTS cf. 2011 Ref: MP Period PT Statistics (3 Hour Total) 31 1 Introduction 1.1 Overview 1.1.1 This note summarises LTS modelling carried out to inform development of the Mayor's Transport Strategy (published in July 2001) for MTS Scenarios. It presents these both in terms of background to, and results from, the LTS test MTS study. 1.1.2 This note restricts itself to the main emphasis of the study examining the ten year strategy from the present day to future year 2011. 1.2 Objectives of the Study 1.2.1 The Greater London Authority (GLA) in conjunction with Transport for London commissioned LTS to provide demand model forecasting and analysis to support analysis of measures set out in the Draft London Mayor's Transport Strategy (MTS) document which had been published for Public Consultation. 1.2.2 The measures include increased reliability and capacity on existing rail and underground services, additional infrastructure such as new rail lines and extensions to existing lines, road schemes, river crossings, pedestrianisation schemes, more frequent reliable bus services, and road user congestion charging. 1.2.3 The LTS model (version B2.11) has been used to analyse the impact of these schemes and measures. The work described here was largely carried out between February and June 2001. As explained in paragraph 2.15 of the final published strategy document, the MTS published forecasts draw on past trends, research by TfL, and LTS model results; a separate note prepared by TfL/ GLA entitled “Technical Note on Demand and Capacity Analysis Carried Out to Inform the Development of the Mayor’s Transport Strategy” explains how the projections in the MTS were derived. 1.3 Structure of this Note 1.3.1 Chapter 2 describes the main technical issues relating to the LTS model and modelling. It describes briefly the structure of the LTS model and the modelling of public transport reliability and crowding. 1.3.2 Chapter 3 describes the planning data inputs to the model and the assumptions utilised in this study. These assumptions underpin the forecast growth in travel. These were based on interim outputs which are being updated for work on the Mayor’s Spatial Development Strategy. 1.3.3 Chapter 4 describes the transport network inputs to the model and the assumptions which have been adopted for the various strategies under consideration. Note that various simplifications had to be made for the modelling, and that thinking on scheme definitions has been refined further since the work was done. LTS Modelling to inform work on the Mayor's Transport Strategy Page 1 1 Introduction 1.3.4 Chapters 5 presents the main LTS forecast results, in terms of aggregate summary statistics for both highway and public transport modes to the year 2011. 1.3.5 Throughout this report the Mayor's Transport Strategy is referred to by the acronym MTS. In addition, the term Rail is synonymous with National Rail. Test MTS refers to the LTS test package of MTS improvements investigated as part of this study. LTS Modelling to inform work on the Mayor's Transport Strategy Page 2 2 Modelling Approach 2.1 Background to the LTS Model 2.1.1 The London Transportation Studies (LTS) Model is a strategic multi-modal model for London. It is developed and maintained by MVA on behalf of Transport for London (TfL), and is used to provide transport professionals with data forecasts and analysis on travel in the London area. Figure 2.1 illustrates the essential structure of the LTS Model, which is described in detail below. Figure 2.1 Schematic Representation of the LTS Model 2.1.2 The LTS model includes the volume of demand for travel by car, public transport, walk/cycle and lorry in the base year of 1991. Planning data include demographic inputs, jobs and car ownership, and are used to update the demand for travel in a forecast year. The demand for travel is held at a zone level comprising 1019 zones across the study area of London (within the M25) and 584 zones outside. 2.1.3 Within the study area, all Motorways, A-roads, B-roads and important minor roads are represented in LTS by a 20,000 one-way link highway network. For public transport the entire system, (including all surface rail and underground services and stations, and bus services within the LTS area) is represented by a 30,000 one-way link public transport network. The links replicate the routes by which people may travel between zones. The LTS model has networks for the years 1991, 1996 and 2001, and reference networks for future years 2011 and 2021. 2.1.4 LTS models person travel for three separate time periods: morning peak (0700-1000); interpeak (1000-1600); evening peak (1600-1900). The seven categories of person trips modelled are: home based (white collar work; blue collar work; education; employers' business; other); non LTS Modelling to inform work on the Mayor's Transport Strategy Page 3 2 Modelling Approach home based (employers' business; other). Trip matrices are forecast by mode and destination for each of the purposes. These are added to lorry, taxi and visitor trips for assignment to the appropriate highway or public transport network. 2.1.5 The forecasting process follows a conventional structure known as the "four stage model", ie demand (trip ends), mode choice, distribution and assignment. This was illustrated in Figure 2.1. The model can be thought of as having five modules: • demand model • mode and distribution (destination choice) • public transport model • highway model • evaluation 2.1.6 All steps of the model are run for trips wholly within the study area and trips with at least one end within the study area. For trips wholly outside the study area, the current trip pattern is modified by growth rates which are consistent with the National Road Traffic Forecasts (NRTF). 2.1.7 The demand trip end models provide inputs to the overall process, with final loaded networks and an evaluation, if required, as an output.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Basics of Concession Contracts
    Designing Transit Concession Contracts to Deal with Uncertainty by MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE Tara Naomi Chin Blakey OF TECHNOLOGY B.S., Civil Engineering (2004) ARE62009 University of Florida LIBRARIES Submitted to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Transportation at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June 2006 ©2006 Massachusetts Institute of Technology All rights reserved Signature of Author............ ... Civil and Environmental Engineering May 26, 2006 Certified by.......................... ............ Prof Nigel H. M. Wilson Professor of Civil aid Environmental Engineering - The1 is Supervisor Accepted by.............................................. And? 4. Whittle Chairman, Department Committee on Graduate Studies 1 BARKER Designing Transit Concession Contracts to Deal with Uncertainty By Tara Naomi Chin Blakey Submitted to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering On May 25, 2006 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Transportation ABSTRACT This thesis proposes a performance regime structure for public transit concession contracts, designed so incentives to the concessionaire can be effective given significant uncertainty about the future operating conditions. This is intended to aid agencies in designing regimes that will encourage continually improving performance through the use of relevant and adaptive incentives. The proposed incentives are adjusted annually based on actual circumstances. An adaptive regime can also allow the incentives to be more cost and resource efficient and is especially well-suited to so-called "gross-cost" contracts when the public agency retains the fare revenue and absorbs the revenue risk for the services. The motivation for this research is the anticipated transfer of the oversight responsibilities for the Silverlink Metro regional rail services, in outer London, from the UK Department for Transport to Transport for London.
    [Show full text]
  • Crossrail 1 Corridor 6 (Richmond/Kingston/Norbiton) Proposal
    Crossrail 1 Corridor 6 (Richmond/Kingston/Norbiton) Proposal Response by London Borough of Hounslow February 2003 Crossrail 1 Corridor 6 (Richmond/Kingston/Norbiton) Proposal: Response by London Borough of Hounslow February 2003 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Context This submission constitutes the London Borough of Hounslow’s response to an invitation to provide initial comments on the Crossrail project’s proposal for a new corridor for Crossrail 1: Corridor 6 – Norbiton, via Old Oak Common, Acton, Chiswick, Richmond and Kingston. The submission considers the proposal in terms of service and amenity for the borough’s residents and businesses, and within the context of the Council’s published policies. In addition to the two options that constitute the Corridor 6 proposals, this submission provides two further options for Crossrail’s consideration. While the Council must record its disappointment that an effective period of less than two weeks was offered for preparation of this submission, the Council also wishes to record its appreciation for the assistance given by the Crossrail consultation team during the preparation of the submission. 1.2 Council Policies The London Borough of Hounslow Unitary Development Plan’s objectives relating to transport and land use development are summarised below: • To promote sustainable transport modes (walking, cycling, public and waterborne transport) which improves access for all members of the community and enhances public transport provision in London as a whole, while reducing car traffic and the demand for road space. • To encourage a pattern of land use, and provision of transport which minimises harm to the environment and reduces the need to travel, especially by car, whilst maximising development opportunities in the Borough.
    [Show full text]
  • LTS Modelling to Inform Work on the Mayor's Transport Strategy
    LTS Modelling to inform work on the Mayor's Transport Strategy Prepared for Transport for London November 2001 Document Control Project Title: LTS Modelling to inform work on the Mayor's Transport Strategy MVA Project Number: C3895022 WP Reference: cmp\tm Directory & File Name: l:\london\lts\c8950.22\summary\mtsnote.doc Document Approval Primary Author: Richard Stanley Other Author(s): Reviewer(s): Paul Hanson (MVA) Henry Abraham (GLA) Issue Date Distribution Comments 1 16/11/01 THu, HAb, PHa First Draft for Review 2 23/11/01 THu, HAb Second Draft 3 26/11/01 HAb Published Version Contents Chapter Page 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Overview 1 1.2 Objectives of the Study 1 1.3 Structure of this Note 1 2 Modelling Approach 3 2.1 Background to the LTS Model 3 2.2 Modelling Goods Vehicles 5 2.3 Modelling Public Transport Reliability 5 2.4 Modelling Public Transport Crowding: LTS Crowding factors 5 2.5 PiXC as used in the Rail Industry 6 2.6 PiXC as used in the LTS model 7 3 Planning Data Assumptions 8 3.1 Introduction 8 3.2 B2.11 Borough Level Planning Data 8 4 Transport Network Assumptions 14 4.1 Scenarios 14 4.2 2001 Reference Case Scenario 14 4.3 2011 Reference Case Scenario 14 4.4 2011 Test MTS (Mayor's Transport Strategy) Package 16 4.5 2011 Test MTS Package - Road-Based Improvements 16 4.6 2011 Test MTS Package - Radial Rail Infrastructure Improvements 17 4.7 2011 Test MTS Package - Orbital Rail Infrastructure Improvements 17 4.8 2011 Test MTS Package - Underground Service Improvements 18 4.9 2011 Test MTS Package - DLR Improvements 19 4.10 2011
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Response to the Mayor of London
    (APPENDIX TO KEY DECISION REPORT - ‘THE COUNCIL’S RESPONSE TO THE MAYOR OF LONDON’S DRAFT AMBIENT NOISE STRATEGY’) [Final text to be transferred onto Councillor Moylan’s letterhead] Ken Livingstone Esq Mayor of London (Ambient Noise Strategy Consultation) Greater London Authority FREEPOST 15799 LONDON SE1 2BR [First date after implementation period to be inserted] Dear Mr Livingstone The Royal Borough’s response to the draft London Ambient Noise Strategy Background noise caused by road traffic, trains, or low flying aircraft is part of daily life in central London, but in some parts of the Royal Borough, where noise levels are unduly high, it is a source of considerable annoyance to residents. In fact there are few parts of the Borough that do not suffer a certain amount of disturbance from busy roads, although in an overall sense this reflects vibrant activity, the ‘buzz’ that you yourself refer to. This Council welcomes a comprehensive approach to controlling background noise, whether from transport sources, or industrial and commercial operations. An action- orientated noise strategy for London, which prepares the way for the National Ambient Noise Strategy expected in 2007, should put London in a stronger position to influence the controls, such as noise limit values, eventually imposed by Government. We are very much in favour of proactive measures to reduce ambient noise levels that can be achieved without disproportionate costs, and that target the worst affected areas. The Royal Borough together with the London Boroughs of Hammersmith and Fulham and Wandsworth, successfully negotiated a substantial noise mitigation scheme to offset the railway noise impact on line-side residents of Channel Tunnel trains using the West London Line.
    [Show full text]
  • STRATEGIC PLANNING ADVISORY PANEL AGENDA and Papers
    Transport for London STRATEGIC PLANNING ADVISORY PANEL Meeting No. 2 to be held on Monday 14 May 2007 Windsor House, 14th Floor Boardroom at 2pm AGENDA A Meeting of the Panel will be held to deal with the following business: 1. Apologies for Absence 2. Minutes of Previous Meeting held on 16 January 2007 3. Matters Arising and Outstanding Items Business Items Sponsor 4. SPAP Work Plan 2007/2008 Peter Hendy, Commissioner 5. Mayor’s Transport Strategy - Steve Allen, Interim MD Finance Progress Update (Barry Broe) 6. Olympic Transport Projects Steve Allen, Interim MD Finance (Richard Browning) 7. Travel Demand Management - Ben Plowden, Programme Director, TDM Emerging Priorities 8. Any Other Business Date of next meeting (Combined): Wednesday 3 October 2007 Page 1 of 1 TRANSPORT FOR LONDON STRATEGIC PLANNING ADVISORY PANEL MINUTES of the Panel meeting held in the Boardroom, 14th Floor Windsor House, at 10.00am on Tuesday 16 January 2007 Present: Peter Hendy (Chair) Dave Wetzel Honor Chapman Stephen Glaister Sir Mike Hodgkinson Ben Plowden Jay Walder In attendance: Steve Allen Director of Corporate Finance Barry Broe Director of Group Transport Planning & Policy Richard Browning Dir. of Group Business Planning & Performance Howard Carter General Counsel Gareth John Director of Legal & Compliance Jeff Pipe Corporate Governance Adviser Elaine Seagriff Head of Policy & Strategy Shashi Verma Director of Oyster Card Secretary: Horatio Chishimba 01/01/07 Apologies for Absence Apologies for absence were received from Lynn Sloman and Eva Lindholm. 02/01/07 Declaration of Interests None declared. 03/01/07 SPAP Terms of Reference The Panel noted the content of the SPAP Terms of Reference as agreed by the Board on 25 October 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5: LIP Proposals
    Chapter 5: LIP Proposals Contents Page Number Introduction 121 Part One – Addressing the Policies and Proposals in the 123 Mayor’s Transport Strategy Road Maintenance 123 Principal Roads Maintenance 123 Non-Principal Roads Maintenance 124 Bridge Assessment and Strengthening 124 Local Safety Schemes 125 20 MPH Zones 126 Education, Training and Publicity Schemes 127 Walking 127 Cycling 130 London Cycle Network (LCN) + 132 Non-LCN + Network 132 Cycle Parking and Cyclist Training 132 Traffic Signals 133 Buses 133 Bus Stop Accessibility 133 Bus Priority 134 Enforcement and Management of Bus Routes 135 London Bus Priority Network (LBPN) 135 ‘A’ Roads and Busy Bus Routes and Parallel Initiatives 136 Bus Network 137 Operation of Bus Services in the Borough 137 Bus Network Development 138 Area Based Schemes 140 Chapter 5: LIP Proposals 117 Town Centres 140 Streets for People 142 Station Access 143 School Travel Plans – Safe Routes to School 146 Workplace Travel Plans 146 Travel Awareness 147 Freight 149 Regeneration Area Schemes 150 Environment 151 Air Quality Improvement 152 Ambient Noise reduction 152 Controlled Parking Zones (CPZs) 152 Accessibility 153 Community Transport, Door-to-Door Transport Services, 154 Taxis, Private Hire Vehicles Monitoring 155 A13 Route Management Study 156 Airports 156 Biodiversity 156 Car Clubs 157 Consultation 157 East London Transit 157 Freight Interchange and Distribution 157 Land-Use Policies and Planning 158 London Traffic Control Centre 158 Chapter 5: LIP Proposals 118 2012 Olympic Games and Other Events 158
    [Show full text]
  • West London Economic Development Strategy December 2004
    West London Economic Development Strategy December 2004 This report was commissioned by West London Partnership and undertaken by Robert Huggins Associates and Rubicon Regeneration. The views expressed in the Strategy are those of West London Partnership and do not necessarily reflect those of the London Development Agency or the Greater London Authority Group. Whilst every effort has been made to ensure that the contents of the report are accurate, neither the London Development Agency or the Greater London Authority Group accept responsibility for any inaccuracies in the data Prepared for West London Partnership in collaboration with the LDA, WLA and WLB by: West London | Economic Development Strategy 2 Contents 5 BUSINESS COMPETITIVENESS 73 5.1 Background 73 INTRODUCTION 5 5.2 Strategic Context 73 5.3 Key Issues 96 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 5.4 Objectives and Rationale 100 2 VISION 25 6 LAND AND PROPERTY 102 6.1 Background 103 3 WEST LONDON CONTEXT 28 6.2 Strategic Context 104 3.1 Overview of West London 32 6.3 Key Issues 110 3.2 International Setting 36 6.4 Objectives and Rationale 116 3.3 West London and its Surrounding Regions 40 3.4 Drivers 47 7 HOUSING 119 7.1 Background 119 4 SKILLS FOR GROWTH 56 7.2 Strategic Context 121 4.1 Background 56 7.3 Key Issues 124 4.2 Strategic Context 56 7.4 Objectives and Rationale 133 4.3 Key Issues 58 4.4 Objectives and Rationale 71 West London | Economic Development Strategy 3 8 TRANSPORT 136 11 APPENDIX 186 8.1 Background 136 Appendix A: Summary of Transport Data for West 8.2 Strategic Context 138
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Mayor's Transport Strategy Tfl's REPORT to the MAYOR on CONSULTATION
    Draft Mayor’s Transport Strategy Statutory consultation with the public and stakeholders TfL’S REPORT TO THE MAYOR ON CONSULTATION April 2010 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................... 3 2. The Consultation Process .................................................................................. 18 3. Analysis of Response by Theme ....................................................................... 30 4. Other Issues of relevance to the development of the draft MTS ...................... 207 5. Next Steps ....................................................................................................... 214 Appendices: Appendix 1 List of stakeholders consulted Appendix 2 List of stakeholders who responded to the consultation Appendix 3 List of meetings relevant to the development of the MTS Annexes: Annex A Report on the analysis of responses from the public, businesses and other organisations (prepared by Accent Marketing Research) Annex B Summary for each stakeholder response received Annex C TfL‟s consideration of late responses received Please note, Annex A is at the end of this document, preceded by Appendices 1,2 and 3, and Annexes B and C. Report to the Mayor, April 2010 2 1. Introduction 1.1 Overview and purpose of this Report 1.1.1 The Mayor of London decided to produce a new, revised Mayor‟s Transport Strategy (MTS), to replace the one approved in 2001. The MTS is the principal policy tool through which the Mayor and TfL
    [Show full text]
  • Transport for London, London Rail London Overground East London
    Transport for London, London Rail London Overground East London Railway & Stations Improvements Public Meeting: Naborhood Centre, Sydenham Road 14th March 2007 Introducing ‘London Overground’ Dalston Curve NLR and ELR Connection; the Orbirail Network Overground - the regeneration railway Dalston Curve Brockley Honor Oak Park ELL Phase 2 Forest Hill (Uncommitted) Sydenham Station challenges Example: Sydenham, 2006 Poor waiting facilities and accommodations Difficult station access and poor signage Poor interior station layout (difficult access to ticket office) 4 Overground stations • November 2007: TfL takes over existing North London stations • Four stage approach: ° Enabling works/Oyster/Gating ° Blitz clean ° Refurbishment: includes upgraded information, help points and CCTV ° Rebuild some stations • Lewisham stations served by London Overground: ° Sydenham; Honor Oak Park; Brockley; Forest Hill; New Cross Gate; New Cross ° Network Rail via the DfT funding under Access for All will introduce step free access • Improvement package for refurbished stations: better waiting facilities, better lighting, CCTV, help points, provision of Oyster validators and ticket vending machines 5 New trains on London Overground • Contract awarded to Bombardier • £223M contract to deliver: – 20 x 4 car units (ELR) December 09 – 24 x 3 car units (NLR) December 08 • Constructed in Derby & maintained at New Cross Gate • Key features include: wider seats, wheelchair provision, CCTV, audio and visual real time information, wider gangway, better hand rail, air
    [Show full text]
  • The Barking & Gospel Oak Line Committee
    BARKI NG – GOSPEL OAK LINE USER GROUP Chairman: Alderman Frederick Jones, Barking & Dagenham Council Secretary: Richard H Pout B.Sc. Econ. MILT, (020) 8348 5064 Assistant Secretary: Glenn Wallis, (020) 8529 2361, 07789 791224 www.barking-gospeloak.org.uk info@barking -gospleoak.org.uk BARKING – GOSPEL OAK LINE USER GROUP eBULLETIN 7th APRIL 2012 § EASTER RAIL SERVICES & ENGINEERING WORKS § LONDON MAYORAL AND ASSEMBLY ELECTIONS & HLOS2 Next edition: § LOROL PASSENGER GROUP MEETING § RAIL REPLACEMENT BUSES SERVICES § STATION NEWS § RAILTOUR PHOTO APPEAL Apologies, due to ill health and “events, dear boy, events”, this e-bulletin is two weeks later than originally intended and has pushed the planned Winter 2011/12 ‘proper’ newsletter back yet again, still now that photographs are being included the e-bulletins looks a bit better. If anyone is unhappy with this and would prefer a text only e-bulletin, please let me know. EASTER RAIL SERVICES & ENGINEERING WORKS LONDON OVERGROUND Thanks to yet another ‘inaccuracy’ on the TfL 1 website, exactly what service was being was being provided by London Overground over Easter where engineering work allowed was shrouded in confusion for a while. Happily LOROL2 were able to confirm that as usual on public holidays, a Saturday service would be provided. The only engineering block affects the Barking – Gospel Oak Line and the North London Line, this is understood to be due to more work on the SSI 3 and signallers’ displays, this time at Upminster Signalling Centre although to get maximum value from this block Network Rail will probably be carrying out other work too. • Saturday 7 th April From 20:00 the Barking – Gospel Oak Line service will terminate/start at Upper Holloway.
    [Show full text]
  • The Barking to Gospel Oak Line User Group
    The Barking to Gospel Oak Line User Group Evidence to the GLA Transport Scrutiny Committee - May 2010 Continuing development of the London Overground Network Barking - Gospel Oak Line User Group (BGOLUG) is pleased to be invited to discuss the developments of the Overground Network promoted by Transport for London (TfL). London Overground Rail Operations Limited (LOROL) became the service provider from 11th November 2007. Transport Scrutiny Committee members have supported the Overground proposals, promoted in the 2001 Mayor's Transport Plan as Orbirail. Both Mayors, Ken Livingstone and Boris Johnson have recognised the importance of 'overground' trains; the problem was that while promoting Network South East as a coherent, cohesive operation, integration might have been achieved rather more quickly. The machinations of ill conceived rail privatisation and a widely intransigent railway management, entrenched in their own methodology - 'this is the way we do it' - did not help. Both the North London Line (NLL) and Gospel Oak - Barking (GO-B) Line suffered years of neglect under British Railways' management. The routes were not a priority, limited importance being given only to facilitate cross-London freight movements. Limited investment went in during the Railtrack - Silverlink period (1997 - 2007) with some financial assistance from supportive local authorities towards basic station improvements. Services were basic, the NLL with its 20 minute interval service, finally improved to quarter-hourly in the late 1990s, but at a cost, losing the Watford - Liverpool Street service from September 1992. The GO-B Line operated just a half hourly 2-coach service for over 20 years, until TfL funded additional peak services from December 2005, during the latter period of the Silverlink franchise.
    [Show full text]
  • Board Meeting – Open Session to Be Held on 20 September 2006 at 1000 Hours in the Chamber City Hall, the Queen’S Walk, London Se1 2Aa
    TRANSPORT FOR LONDON BOARD MEETING – OPEN SESSION TO BE HELD ON 20 SEPTEMBER 2006 AT 1000 HOURS IN THE CHAMBER CITY HALL, THE QUEEN’S WALK, LONDON SE1 2AA AGENDA A Meeting of the Board will be held to deal with the following business: 1. Apologies for Absence 2. Minutes of the Previous Meeting held on 28 June 2006 3. Any Matters Arising from the Minutes Business Items Sponsor 4. The Commissioner’s Report Peter Hendy, Commissioner 5. Operational and Investment Financial Report Jay Walder, Managing Director Finance and Planning 6. Revenue Enforcement & Prosecutions Policy Jeroen Weimar, Director of Transport Policing & Enforcement 7. Standing Orders Revision Howard Carter, General Counsel 8. TTL Appointments Howard Carter, General Counsel Items for Noting 9. Chair's Action re: ELL Contracts Howard Carter, General Counsel 10. Directions and Delegations Howard Carter, General Counsel 11. Report from the Finance Committee Sir Mike Hodgkinson, Chair of the (oral) Committee 12. Report from Safety, Health and Environment Dave Wetzel, Chair of the Committee Committee 13. Any Other Business Page 1 of 1 TRANSPORT FOR LONDON MEETING OF MEMBERS OF THE BOARD – OPEN SESSION MINUTES of the Board Meeting held in the Chamber, City Hall, The Queen’s Walk, London, SE1 2AA at 10.00 am on Wednesday, 28 June 2006 Present: Dave Wetzel (Chair) Stephen Glaister Kirsten Hearn Paul Moore Sir Gulam Noon Patrick O’Keeffe John Ormerod Tony West In attendance: Lord Toby Harris Bryan Heiser Murziline Parchment Lynn Sloman Barry Broe Director of Group Transport Planning
    [Show full text]