DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter 5: LIP Proposals

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chapter 5: LIP Proposals Chapter 5: LIP Proposals Contents Page Number Introduction 121 Part One – Addressing the Policies and Proposals in the 123 Mayor’s Transport Strategy Road Maintenance 123 Principal Roads Maintenance 123 Non-Principal Roads Maintenance 124 Bridge Assessment and Strengthening 124 Local Safety Schemes 125 20 MPH Zones 126 Education, Training and Publicity Schemes 127 Walking 127 Cycling 130 London Cycle Network (LCN) + 132 Non-LCN + Network 132 Cycle Parking and Cyclist Training 132 Traffic Signals 133 Buses 133 Bus Stop Accessibility 133 Bus Priority 134 Enforcement and Management of Bus Routes 135 London Bus Priority Network (LBPN) 135 ‘A’ Roads and Busy Bus Routes and Parallel Initiatives 136 Bus Network 137 Operation of Bus Services in the Borough 137 Bus Network Development 138 Area Based Schemes 140 Chapter 5: LIP Proposals 117 Town Centres 140 Streets for People 142 Station Access 143 School Travel Plans – Safe Routes to School 146 Workplace Travel Plans 146 Travel Awareness 147 Freight 149 Regeneration Area Schemes 150 Environment 151 Air Quality Improvement 152 Ambient Noise reduction 152 Controlled Parking Zones (CPZs) 152 Accessibility 153 Community Transport, Door-to-Door Transport Services, 154 Taxis, Private Hire Vehicles Monitoring 155 A13 Route Management Study 156 Airports 156 Biodiversity 156 Car Clubs 157 Consultation 157 East London Transit 157 Freight Interchange and Distribution 157 Land-Use Policies and Planning 158 London Traffic Control Centre 158 Chapter 5: LIP Proposals 118 2012 Olympic Games and Other Events 158 Parking and Enforcement 158 Park and Ride 160 Personal Safety 160 Powered Two Wheelers 160 Rail 161 Road Signs and Lines 161 School Buses 161 Shopmobility 162 Traffic Growth Reduction 162 Traffic Management Act 2004 and Network Management Duty 162 Conclusion 162 Part 2 – Proposal Forms 164 Introduction 164 Core Proposals 168 Large Capital Proposals 268 Proposals from Other TGLP Boroughs 317 Chapter 5: LIP Proposals 119 List of Tables Page Number Table 5.1: Cross-Cutting Goals 165 Table 5.2: Core Proposals 165 Table 5.3: Large Capital Proposals 166 Table 5.4: Proposals from Other TGLP Boroughs 167 Table 5.5: LIP Proposal Summary Sheet – Form 2 325 Chapter 5: LIP Proposals 120 Introduction 5.1 Section 145 of the Greater London Authority Act 1999 (‘GLA Act’) requires that London local authorities prepare LIPs containing their proposals to implement locally the Mayor’s Transport Strategy. This chapter sets out a five-year programme that the Council will seek to undertake between 2006/07 and 2010/11, in order to implement the Mayor’s Transport Strategy as well as deliver the Council’s own objectives and Barking and Dagenham’s Community Priorities. 5.2 Chapter 5 is made up of two parts. Part One sets out the proposals and policies in the Mayor’s Transport Strategy that the Council is required or encouraged to help deliver; sets out in broad terms how the Council intends to help deliver these; and provides contextual information. Part One of Chapter 5 uses topic headings that reflect the topic headings under which TfL invites boroughs to bid for funds on an annual basis, as well as some of the topic headings used in the Mayor’s Transport Strategy or LIP Guidance. The topic headings used are: • Road Maintenance; • Bridge Assessment and Strengthening; • Local Safety Schemes; • 20mph Zones; • Education, Training and Publicity; • Walking; • Cycling; • Buses; • Area Based Schemes; • School Travel Plans; • Workplace Travel Plans; • Travel Awareness; • Freight; • Regeneration Area Schemes; • Environment; • Controlled Parking Zones; • Accessibility; • Accessible Transport; • Integration; • Streets; • Car Use; • Monitoring; • Strategies; • International. 5.3 Part Two of Chapter 5 sets out in more detail, via a series of Proposal Forms (‘Form 1s’), how the Council intends to implement the Mayor’s Transport Chapter 5: LIP Proposals 121 Strategy, and provides an estimate of the funding that will be required on an annual basis. Read together, these Proposal Forms make up the Council’s transport programme for the next five years. 5.4 Part Two also contains a LIP Proposal Summary Sheet (‘Form 2’), which cross-references the Proposals Forms against the policies and proposals in the Mayor’s Transport Strategy that the Council is encouraged or required to deliver. Form 2 is in effect a checklist. 5.5 Funding for 2006/07 and 2007/08 has already been secured and proposals have either been implemented or are being designed and implemented. Beyond 2007/08 proposals will be implemented subject to funding being secured. For 2009/10 and 2010/11 there is less certainty as to specific proposals but an indication is given as to whether a programme or proposal is likely to require a similar level of funding, an increase or decrease in funding, or no further funding. 5.6 The Council will submit ‘LIP Funding’ submissions to Transport for London to help deliver the proposals set out in this chapter. The Council will monitor annually the delivery of its programme of proposals and report on this via its LIP Annual Progress Report (‘LIP APR’). Any slippage in implementation, new proposals, or bringing forward of proposals will be picked up by this process and reflected in a revised programme. 5.7 Chapter 3 (Borough Policy Statement) sets out LIP policies as well as ‘strategic transport schemes’ that will largely be pursued and funded by other bodies. Read together with this chapter it is possible to understand the full portfolio of proposals and transport policies that the Council believes necessary to deliver the Mayor’s Transport Strategy locally and deliver the Council’s Community Priorities. 5.8 The environmental effects of LIP policies and proposals have been assessed through a Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA). The SEA has concluded that the LIP will not have any significant adverse environmental effects. However, the SEA made a number of recommendations to reduce negative effects and promote the opportunities within the LIP to provide added benefits. These recommendations have been incorporated into the LIP. Chapter 5: LIP Proposals 122 Part One – Addressing the Policies and Proposals in the Mayor’s Transport Strategy Road Maintenance Mayor’s Proposals: Proposal 4G.25: As the first stage in a new approach to street maintenance, Transport for London and the London boroughs will each produce three-year priority street maintenance plan to cover bridges and principal carriageways reflecting the objectives of the Transport Strategy and available resources. Proposal 4G.26: Transport for London will work with the London boroughs to develop a long-term approach to the funding and management of all aspects of street maintenance throughout London. 5.9 Highways maintenance is a high priority for the Council and has also been for the Mayor of London. It makes good economic sense to maintain infrastructure in a good state of repair rather than let it deteriorate and incur much higher costs later. Highways in a state of good condition also contribute to achieving other objectives such a personal safety (e.g. no or less tripping on pavements) and road safety (e.g. cyclists not hitting potholes and swerving). 5.10 Standard accepted methods (UKPMS surveys) are used to assess the condition of the network, resources required to bring it up to standard, and the priority locations for repair and reconstruction. Maintenance of Principal Roads 5.11 Borough principal roads are generally those linking major centres and are the main bus routes. They are the responsibility of the Council. 5.12 Their maintenance has been a high priority of the Mayor as reflected in past financial support to the boroughs. The Council will continue to bid to Transport for London for funds to make up the maintenance backlog with the aim of bringing all ‘A’ roads and busy bus routes up to serviceable standard – that is a UKPMS score of 70 or below – by 2010. Proposal Form 20 sets out detailed proposals and the level of financial support from Transport for London that the Council is seeking. 5.13 As part of a new approach to street maintenance the Council will develop by June 2008 a Highways Asset Management Plan (HAMP) for the highways under its responsibility. The asset management plan will support MTS proposals 4G.25 and 4G.26 as well as objectives in TfL’s Street Maintenance Plan. Chapter 5: LIP Proposals 123 5.14 It is proposed that the HAMP be prepared according to the following programme: • Produce HAMP Scoping Report – June to September 2007; • Report HAMP Scoping Report to Directorate Management Team – October 2007; • Prepare HAMP – November 2007 to May 2008; • Publish HAMP – June 2008. Maintenance of Non-Principal Roads 5.15 Generally, non-principal roads are the remainder of the highway network in the borough for which the Council is responsible. Their maintenance has not been financially supported in recent past years by Transport for London. With restricted resources and the scale of the maintenance backlog, support from Transport for London has had to be prioritised to the more strategic roads – the Principal Road Network. 5.16 Accordingly, works on non-principal roads have been financed out of the Council’s own capital resources and this is assumed to continue to have to be the case for the foreseeable future. The Council will continue to finance the maintenance of non-principal roads in order to reduce the backlog of work that has resulted from years of underfunding. The amount of funds that the Council will be able to spend on the maintenance of non-principal roads will depend on the priority given to this area in the context of other (competing) demands on the Council’s capital resources. Proposal Form 21 sets out the level of Council funding for the maintenance of non-principal roads.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tfl RIVER CROSSINGS CONSULTATION EXERCISE and the REDBRIDGE RESPONSE: BRIEFING PAPER
    TfL RIVER CROSSINGS CONSULTATION EXERCISE AND THE REDBRIDGE RESPONSE: BRIEFING PAPER 1. Overview Building upon previous consultations, Transport for London is presently undertaking a public consultation exercise seeking views upon a revised set of options for new crossings of the River Thames east of Silvertown. (A proposed new tunnel under the Thames linking Silvertown with the North Greenwich peninsular has already attracted support and will be the subject of separate consultation later this year). The four options upon which views are now sought comprise: A new modern ferry at Woolwich A ferry service at Gallions Reach A bridge at Gallions Reach A bridge at Belvedere. The location of these options is shown in Appendix A in a separate document accompanying this one. For each separate proposal, views are invited whether respondents Strongly Support/Support/Neither/ Oppose/ Strongly Oppose. The public consultation deadline is 12th September, but Boroughs have been given until 30th September to respond. The purpose of this paper is to draw attention to this consultation, summarise broadly the features of the emerging options and to seek a steer on the stance to be followed in LB Redbridge’s formal reply. 2. Background It is important to be aware of previous formal LB Redbridge positions conveyed to TfL in respect of new river crossings proposals. Those stances are summarised in Appendix B to this paper. The salient context surrounding the options now being considered is summarised below: TfL consultation in recent years has yielded support from a majority of respondents to provision of new Thames crossings, with businesses in east and south-east London very supportive.
    [Show full text]
  • London LOOP Section 22 Harold Wood to Upminster Bridge
    V4 : May 2011V4 : May London LOOP Directions: Exit Harold Wood station by the stairs at the end of the platform Section 22 to join the LOOP route which passes the station‟s main exit. Harold Wood to Upminster Bridge Once outside the station and on Gubbins Lane turn left then left again into Oak Road. Follow the road straight ahead past Athelstan Road and Ethelburga Road – lots of Saxon names here - and then go down Archibald Road, the third street on the right. Go through the metal barrier onto the gravel road passing the houses on the right and the Ingrebourne River quietly flowing by on the left. Continue on the short stretch of tarmac road to the busier Squirrels Heath Road and turn right. Start: Harold Wood (TQ547905) Station: Harold Wood After a short distance turn left into the modest Brinsmead Road A which Finish: Upminster Bridge (TQ550868) leads to Harold Wood Park. Station: Upminster Bridge Go through the gate and turn immediately right onto the path. Just before Distance: 4 miles (6.9 km) the carpark turn left to follow the tarmac path along the avenue of trees, passing tennis courts on the right. At the end of the path turn left and go past the children‟s playground on the right. A footbridge comes into view on Introduction: This section goes through Pages Wood - a superb new the right. Go over the Ingrebourne River via the wooden footbridge to enter community woodland of 74 hectares, as well as other mysterious woodland, Pages Wood. Turn right and follow the gravel path.
    [Show full text]
  • London City Airport Master Plan 2006
    Master Plan November 2006 Master Plan November 2006 At a more local level, the Airport is a force restrictions we impose will continue. Foreword for regeneration which has not only created Alongside this the opening of the extension jobs and prosperity in the immediate area, of the DLR to the Airport in December but has also helped to spearhead the 2005 means we now have significantly success of landmarks like Canary Wharf improved public transport links with a and ExCel London and drive recent and higher proportion of passengers (49%) future extensions to the Docklands Light accessing the Airport by rail than any other Railway (DLR). UK airport. These links will be strengthened further by the operation of Crossrail in the We are also very well placed to continue future, and LCA is a key supporter of this to drive the economic prosperity flowing project. from the London Olympic and Paralympic Games in 2012. Through co-operating with a wide variety of interested bodies, we will seek to further But to do all this, we need to grow. In improve our already good environmental 2003 the Government published its Aviation record concentrating on reducing our White Paper which required all UK airports contribution to climate change and man- to set out master plans to grow through to aging all emissions, particularly waste. In 2030 to meet the increase in passenger addition, we support the aviation industry’s demand. One of the key objectives of this inclusion in the EU Emissions Trading paper was to maximise the use of existing Scheme, which will allow the issue of runways and infrastructure to delay, aviation greenhouse gas emissions to be reduce and in some cases eliminate the effectively and responsibly addressed.
    [Show full text]
  • Camilla Ween Lessons from London
    Camilla Ween Lessons from London Harvard Loeb Fellow February 2008 1 Developing a World City 2 Better integration of the River Thames 3 Planning for growth 4 Balancing new and old 5 2000 London changed! Greater London Authority Mayor Ken Livingstone 6 Greater London Authority: • Mayor’s Office • Transport for London • London Development Agency • Fire and Emergency Planning • Metropolitan Police 7 What helped change London • Greater London Authority established in 2000 • Spatial Development Strategy - London Plan • Transport for London • Congestion Charge Scheme • Major transport schemes • Role of Land Use Planning • Sustainable travel and ‘soft’ measures 8 Spatial Development Strategy 9 London Plan A coherent set of policies • Climate Change Action Plan • Waste • Noise • Biodiversity • Children’s play space • Flood • Access etc etc 10 11 Transport for London • Overground rail • Underground • Buses • Trams • Taxis • River Services • Cycling • Walking 12 Transport for London • Budget ca $15 Bn • Carries 3 billion passengers pa 13 Transport for London Steady increase in journeys (2007): • Bus up 3.6% • Underground up 4.5% • Docklands Light Rail 16% 14 Transport Strategy 15 Congestion Charge Scheme • First zone introduced 2003 • Area doubled 2007 16 16 Congestion Charging 17 17 Congestion Charge Scheme • Number-plate recognition • Central call-centre billing • Many options for paying: - Buy on the day - Text messaging - Internet 18 Congestion Charging • $16 per day (multiple re-entry) • 7.00 am to 6.00 pm • Monday to Friday • Weekends free 19 Congestion Charging Benefits: • 21 % Traffic reduction • 30% Congestion reduction in first year • 43 % increase in cycling within zone • Reduction in Accidents • Reduction in key traffic pollutants • $250m raised for improving transport 20 Congestion Charging • Public transport accommodating displaced car users • Retail footfall higher than rest of UK • No effect on property prices 21 Major Transport Schemes Being developed: • Crossrail • New tram systems • Major interchanges - e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Winchmore Hill
    Enfield Society News No. 194, Summer 2014 Enfield’s ‘mini-Holland’ project: for and against In our last issue we discussed some of the proposals in Enfield Council’s bid under the London Mayor’s “mini-Holland” scheme to make the borough more cycle-friendly. On 10th March the Mayor announced that Enfield was one of three boroughs whose bids had been selected and that we would receive up to £30 million to implement the project. This provides a great opportunity to make extensive changes and improvements which will affect everyone who uses our streets and town centres, but there is not unanimous agreement that the present proposals are the best way of spending this money. The Council has promised extensive consultations before the proposals are developed to a detailed design stage, but it is not clear whether there are conditions attached to the funds which would prevent significant departures from the proposals in the bid. The Enfield Society thinks that it would be premature to express a definitive view until the options have been fully explored, but we are keen to participate in the consultation process, in accordance with the aim in our constitution to “ensure that new developments are environmentally sound, well designed and take account of the relevant interests of all sections of the community”. We have therefore asked two of our members to write columns for and against the current proposals, in order to stimulate discussion. A third column, from the Enfield Town Conservation Area Study Group, suggests a more visionary transformation of Enfield Town. Yes to mini-Holland! Doubts about mini- Let’s start with the people of Enfield.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 Email
    www.haveringeastlondonramblers.btck.co.uk email: [email protected] Mobile: 07583 532309 Newsletter and Programme December 2018 - March 2019 Chair's Report Another programme and a New Year on our horizon, how time flies by. We have just had our 30th AGM where we reflected on the year making note of our achievements and challenges, which includes our 30th anniversary, the rekindling of our social events and not to forget the ‘walking and talking’ aspect. The challenges faced and which will continue are Network Rail issues, GDPR and Data Transition. All of these issues will continue to progress in 2019 and we will gather and reflect your comments to and from Area. I have reviewed all the programmes 2017/18 just to get an idea of the walking distance and believe it or not the Group has walked over 788 miles, more or less from Lands End to John O’Groats. This does not include any pre- walks or detours!! This is some achievement with only 31 walk leaders, who collectively put on 125 walks. I would like to extend my thanks to every walk leader, back marker and the Committee members who have ensure everything has run smoothly in putting the programmes together, communicating information and delivery of walks. Great team work makes happy walkers. Page 1 Can I be the first to wish everyone a Happy Christmas and Happy New Year. My last word for now: May the road rise up to meet you. May the wind be always at your back. May the sun shine warm upon your face; the rains fall soft upon the fields May the muddy bogs and styles be few and May there be plentiful bushes for your convenience.
    [Show full text]
  • What Light Rail Can Do for Cities
    WHAT LIGHT RAIL CAN DO FOR CITIES A Review of the Evidence Final Report: Appendices January 2005 Prepared for: Prepared by: Steer Davies Gleave 28-32 Upper Ground London SE1 9PD [t] +44 (0)20 7919 8500 [i] www.steerdaviesgleave.com Passenger Transport Executive Group Wellington House 40-50 Wellington Street Leeds LS1 2DE What Light Rail Can Do For Cities: A Review of the Evidence Contents Page APPENDICES A Operation and Use of Light Rail Schemes in the UK B Overseas Experience C People Interviewed During the Study D Full Bibliography P:\projects\5700s\5748\Outputs\Reports\Final\What Light Rail Can Do for Cities - Appendices _ 01-05.doc Appendix What Light Rail Can Do For Cities: A Review Of The Evidence P:\projects\5700s\5748\Outputs\Reports\Final\What Light Rail Can Do for Cities - Appendices _ 01-05.doc Appendix What Light Rail Can Do For Cities: A Review of the Evidence APPENDIX A Operation and Use of Light Rail Schemes in the UK P:\projects\5700s\5748\Outputs\Reports\Final\What Light Rail Can Do for Cities - Appendices _ 01-05.doc Appendix What Light Rail Can Do For Cities: A Review Of The Evidence A1. TYNE & WEAR METRO A1.1 The Tyne and Wear Metro was the first modern light rail scheme opened in the UK, coming into service between 1980 and 1984. At a cost of £284 million, the scheme comprised the connection of former suburban rail alignments with new railway construction in tunnel under central Newcastle and over the Tyne. Further extensions to the system were opened to Newcastle Airport in 1991 and to Sunderland, sharing 14 km of existing Network Rail track, in March 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • Relationship Between Transport and Development in the Thames Gateway
    Relationship between transport and development in the Thames Gateway Contents Front cover......................................................................................................................2 Strategic overview and summary..................................................................................3 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................8 2. The scope of the Thames Gateway in 2003 ............................................................11 3. Transport analysis....................................................................................................30 4. Potential scale of development ................................................................................34 5. Transport and development interaction ................................................................48 6. Strategic focus in the Thames Gateway .................................................................62 7. Phasing of transport and development...................................................................66 8. Conclusions ...............................................................................................................69 9. Appendix A: Travel characteristics and capacities...............................................72 10. Appendix B: Planning aspiration forecasts for SE sub areas ............................86 11. Appendix C: Examples from the Netherlands.....................................................89 12. Appendix
    [Show full text]
  • The Basics of Concession Contracts
    Designing Transit Concession Contracts to Deal with Uncertainty by MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE Tara Naomi Chin Blakey OF TECHNOLOGY B.S., Civil Engineering (2004) ARE62009 University of Florida LIBRARIES Submitted to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Transportation at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June 2006 ©2006 Massachusetts Institute of Technology All rights reserved Signature of Author............ ... Civil and Environmental Engineering May 26, 2006 Certified by.......................... ............ Prof Nigel H. M. Wilson Professor of Civil aid Environmental Engineering - The1 is Supervisor Accepted by.............................................. And? 4. Whittle Chairman, Department Committee on Graduate Studies 1 BARKER Designing Transit Concession Contracts to Deal with Uncertainty By Tara Naomi Chin Blakey Submitted to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering On May 25, 2006 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Transportation ABSTRACT This thesis proposes a performance regime structure for public transit concession contracts, designed so incentives to the concessionaire can be effective given significant uncertainty about the future operating conditions. This is intended to aid agencies in designing regimes that will encourage continually improving performance through the use of relevant and adaptive incentives. The proposed incentives are adjusted annually based on actual circumstances. An adaptive regime can also allow the incentives to be more cost and resource efficient and is especially well-suited to so-called "gross-cost" contracts when the public agency retains the fare revenue and absorbs the revenue risk for the services. The motivation for this research is the anticipated transfer of the oversight responsibilities for the Silverlink Metro regional rail services, in outer London, from the UK Department for Transport to Transport for London.
    [Show full text]
  • Crossrail 1 Corridor 6 (Richmond/Kingston/Norbiton) Proposal
    Crossrail 1 Corridor 6 (Richmond/Kingston/Norbiton) Proposal Response by London Borough of Hounslow February 2003 Crossrail 1 Corridor 6 (Richmond/Kingston/Norbiton) Proposal: Response by London Borough of Hounslow February 2003 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Context This submission constitutes the London Borough of Hounslow’s response to an invitation to provide initial comments on the Crossrail project’s proposal for a new corridor for Crossrail 1: Corridor 6 – Norbiton, via Old Oak Common, Acton, Chiswick, Richmond and Kingston. The submission considers the proposal in terms of service and amenity for the borough’s residents and businesses, and within the context of the Council’s published policies. In addition to the two options that constitute the Corridor 6 proposals, this submission provides two further options for Crossrail’s consideration. While the Council must record its disappointment that an effective period of less than two weeks was offered for preparation of this submission, the Council also wishes to record its appreciation for the assistance given by the Crossrail consultation team during the preparation of the submission. 1.2 Council Policies The London Borough of Hounslow Unitary Development Plan’s objectives relating to transport and land use development are summarised below: • To promote sustainable transport modes (walking, cycling, public and waterborne transport) which improves access for all members of the community and enhances public transport provision in London as a whole, while reducing car traffic and the demand for road space. • To encourage a pattern of land use, and provision of transport which minimises harm to the environment and reduces the need to travel, especially by car, whilst maximising development opportunities in the Borough.
    [Show full text]
  • LTS Modelling to Inform Work on the Mayor's Transport Strategy
    LTS Modelling to inform work on the Mayor's Transport Strategy Prepared for Transport for London November 2001 Document Control Project Title: LTS Modelling to inform work on the Mayor's Transport Strategy MVA Project Number: C3895022 WP Reference: cmp\tm Directory & File Name: l:\london\lts\c8950.22\summary\mtsnote.doc Document Approval Primary Author: Richard Stanley Other Author(s): Reviewer(s): Paul Hanson (MVA) Henry Abraham (GLA) Issue Date Distribution Comments 1 16/11/01 THu, HAb, PHa First Draft for Review 2 23/11/01 THu, HAb Second Draft 3 26/11/01 HAb Published Version Contents Chapter Page 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Overview 1 1.2 Objectives of the Study 1 1.3 Structure of this Note 1 2 Modelling Approach 3 2.1 Background to the LTS Model 3 2.2 Modelling Goods Vehicles 5 2.3 Modelling Public Transport Reliability 5 2.4 Modelling Public Transport Crowding: LTS Crowding factors 5 2.5 PiXC as used in the Rail Industry 6 2.6 PiXC as used in the LTS model 7 3 Planning Data Assumptions 8 3.1 Introduction 8 3.2 B2.11 Borough Level Planning Data 8 4 Transport Network Assumptions 14 4.1 Scenarios 14 4.2 2001 Reference Case Scenario 14 4.3 2011 Reference Case Scenario 14 4.4 2011 Test MTS (Mayor's Transport Strategy) Package 16 4.5 2011 Test MTS Package - Road-Based Improvements 16 4.6 2011 Test MTS Package - Radial Rail Infrastructure Improvements 17 4.7 2011 Test MTS Package - Orbital Rail Infrastructure Improvements 17 4.8 2011 Test MTS Package - Underground Service Improvements 18 4.9 2011 Test MTS Package - DLR Improvements 19 4.10 2011
    [Show full text]
  • The Thames Gateway – Where Next?
    Gateway_Cover.qxd:Smith Institute 28/10/09 13:26 Page 1 the thames gateway – where next? The Smith Institute The Smith Institute, founded in the memory of the late Rt Hon John Smith, is an independent think tank that undertakes research, education and events. Our charitable purpose is educational in regard to the UK economy in its widest sense. We provide a platform for national and international discussion on a wide range of public policy issues concerning social justice, community, governance, enterprise, economy, trade, and the environment. the thames gateway – where next? the thames gateway – where If you would like to know more about the Smith Institute please write to: Edited by Sir Terry Farrell The Smith Institute 4th Floor 30-32 Southampton Street London WC2E 7RA Telephone +44 (0)20 7823 4240 Fax +44 (0)20 7836 9192 Email [email protected] Website www.smith-institute.org.uk Registered Charity No. 1062967 2009 Designed and produced by Owen & Owen Gateway_Text.qxd:Smith 29/10/09 09:19 Page 1 THE SMITH INSTITUTE the thames gateway – where next? The Thames Gateway is the largest and most significant growth and regeneration site in the UK. Although the pace of development has slowed since the credit crunch and the economic downturn hit, the Gateway remains a significant driver for sustainable growth and innovation in London and the Greater South East. Making the most of the Gateway will, moreover, continue to be a feature in the planning of the region for many years to come. The aim of this monograph is not to give a justification for the Gateway or to detail every project.
    [Show full text]