Appendix: List of Interviews

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Appendix: List of Interviews Appendix: List of Interviews The unification of Germany 1) APELT Andreas, Berlin, 23 October 2007. 2) BERGMANN-POHL Sabine, Berlin, 13 December 2007. 3) BIEDENKOPF Kurt, Berlin, 5 December 2007. 4) BIRTHLER Marianne, Berlin, 18 December 2007. 5) CHROBOG Jürgen, Berlin, 13 November 2007. 6) EGGERT Heinz, Dresden, 14 December 2007. 7) EPPELMANN Rainer, Berlin, 21 November 2007. 8) GAUCK Joachim, Berlin, 20 December 2007. 9) GLÄSSNER Gert-Joachim, Berlin, 7 November 2007. 10) HELBIG Monika, Berlin, 5 November 2007. 11) HOFMANN Gunter, Berlin, 30 July 2007. 12) KERWIEN Antonie, Berlin, 31 October 2007. 13) KLINGST Martin, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 7 December 2006. 14) KLOSE Hans-Ulrich, Berlin, 31 October 2007. 15) KRAA Detlev, Berlin, 31 October 2007. 16) KRALINSKI Thomas, Potsdam, 16 October 2007. 17) LENGSFELD Vera, Berlin, 3 December 2007. 18) LIPPERT Barbara, Berlin, 25 July 2007. 19) MAIZIÈRE Lothar de, Berlin, 4 December 2007. 20) MAIZIÈRE Thomas de, Berlin, 20 November 2007. 21) MECKEL Markus, Berlin, 29 November 2007. 22) MERTES Michael, Boston, Massachusetts, 17 November 2006. 23) MEYER Hans Joachim, Berlin, 13 December 2007. 24) MISSELWITZ Hans, Berlin, 6 November 2007. 25) MODROW Hans, Berlin, 28 November 2007. 26) MÜLLER Hans-Peter, Berlin, 13 November 2007. 27) NOOKE Günther, Berlin, 27 November 2007. 28) PAU Petra, Berlin, 13 December 2007. 29) PLATZECK Matthias, Potsdam, 12 December 2007. 30) SABATHIL Gerhard, Berlin, 31 October 2007. 31) SARAZZIN Thilo, Berlin, 30 November 2007. 32) SCHABOWSKI Günther, Berlin, 3 December 2007. 33) SCHÄUBLE Wolfgang, Berlin, 19 December 2007. 34) SCHRÖDER Richard, Berlin, 4 December 2007. 35) SEGERT Dieter, Vienna, 18 June 2008. 36) SEITERS Rudolf, Berlin, 28 June 2009. 37) TELTSCHIK Horst, Munich, 29 April 2008. 38) TUSCHHOFF Christian, Berlin, 8 August 2007. 39) WAIGEL Theo, Munich, 30 April 2008. 40) WEICHSEL Volker, Berlin, 1 November 2007. 41) WEISS Konrad, Berlin, 29 November 2007. 189 190 Appendix: List of Interviews 42) WEIZSÄCKER Richard von, Berlin, 27 November 2007. 43) WEYRAUCH Martina, Potsdam, 16 October 2007. 44) ZIEL Alwin, Potsdam, 14 November 2007. 45) ZÜRN Michael, Berlin, 10 October 2007. Eastern enlargement of the EU 46) AVERY Graham, Brussels, 24 January 2011. 47) BARTÁK Karel, Brussels, 15 July 2008. 48) BRODSKÝ Jiˇrí, Prague, 26 February 2009. 49) BUSEK Erhard, Vienna, 2 June 2008. 50) CERNOCHˇ Pavel, Brussels, 3 March 2011. 51) CHRISTOFFERSEN Poul Skytte, Brussels, 10 February 2011. 52) DANIELSSON Christian, Brussels, 5 April 2009. 53) ERLER Petra, Potsdam, 6 June 2011. 54) FREUDENSTEIN Roland, Hamburg, 15 November 2007. 55) FRIŠTENSKÁ Hana, Prague, 23 February 2009. 56) GREGER Petr, Prague, 8 August 2008. 57) HORÁCEKˇ Milan, Prague, 21 August 2008. 58) JACQUES Kateˇrina, Prague, 29 May 2008. 59) JARABˇ Josef, Prague, 2 July 2008. 60) JEŽEK Petr, Prague, 21 August 2007. 61) KAVAN Jan, Prague, 7 August 2008. 62) KOHOUT Jan, Prague, 16 May 2008. 63) KOVANDA Karel, Brussels, 16 July 2008. 64) KREUTER Josef, Prague, 7 April 2008. 65) KUBERNÁT Petr, Prague, 16 May 2008. 66) KUCHTA Tomáš, Prague, 5 January 2007. 67) KYAW Dietrich von, Berlin, 7 August 2007. 68) LAŠTUVKA˚ Vladimír, LázneBˇ elohradˇ u Jicína,ˇ 18 August 2008. 69) LEIGH Michael, Brussels, 15 April 2009. 70) MCDONAGH-PAJEROVÁ Monika, Prague, 28 May 2008. 71) MORNINGSTAR Richard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2 December 2008. 72) MRACEKˇ Milan, Prague, 29 May 2008. 73) RANSDORF Miloslav, Prague, 12 August 2008. 74) RINGROSE David, Brussels, 16 March 2011. 75) ROUCEKˇ Libor, Prague, 27 June 2008. 76) ROVNÁ Lenka, Prague, 8 April 2008. 77) RYCHETSKÝ Pavel, Brno, 18 February 2009. 78) SECKAˇ Libor, Prague, 15 August 2007. 79) SEFZIG Ludek,ˇ Prague, 12 August 2008. 80) SOBOTKA Pˇremysl, Prague, 1 July 2008. 81) ŠPIDLA Vladimír, Brussels, 15 July 2008. 82) SVOBODA Cyril, Prague, 8 April 2008. 83) TELICKAˇ Pavel, Berlin, 21 November 2007. 84) VAN DER PAS Nikolaus, Brussels, 15 April 2009. 85) VERHEUGEN Günther, Potsdam, 6 June 2011. Appendix: List of Interviews 191 86) WISSELS Rutger, Brussels, 16 July 2008. 87) WOLTE Wolfgang, Vienna, 24 June 2008. 88) ZAHRADIL Jan, Prague, 2 July 2008. 89) ZAORÁLEK Lubomír, Prague, 21 August 2008. 90) ZEMAN Miloš, Nové Veselí, 22 August 2008. Notes 3 The Unification of Germany: A Case of the Transplantation Model of Political Integration 1. My interview with Marianne Birthler, Berlin, 18 December 2007. 2. The masses were mobilized after the clear manipulation of the May 1989 municipal elections in which the communists were declared to have won over 90 percent of the vote (see e.g. Weidenfeld and Korte, 1999). 3. My interview with Günther Nooke, Berlin, 27 November 2007. 4. My interview with Rudolf Seiters, Berlin, 28 June 2009. 5. The SED’s general secretary, Erich Honecker, was forced to resign for ‘health reasons’ after an intraparty coup on 18 October 1989 (see e.g. Fulbrook, 2005). 6. For video recording of the press conference (in German only), see http://youtu.be/TQiriTompdY (accessed: 7 February 2014). For the orig- inal German transcript of the press conference, see http://www.chronik -der-mauer.de/index.php/de/Media/TextPopup/day/9/id/1579592/month/ November/oldAction/Detail/oldModule/Chronical/year/1989 (accessed: 7 February 2014). For the English transcript, see Günter Schabowski, ‘Guenter Schabowski’s Press Conference in the GDR International Press Center,’ Making the History of 1989, Item #449, http://chnm.gmu.edu/ 1989/items/show/449 (accessed: 7 February 2014). For further details on 9 November 1989 (in German), see http://www.chronik-der-mauer .de/index.php/de/Chronical/Detail/day/9/month/November/year/1989 (accessed: 7 February 2014). 7. For a well-written example of such a scholarly account of a ‘bungled press conference,’ see Sarotte (2014). 8. For the German text of the travel law, see http://www.chronik-der-mauer .de/index.php/de/Media/TextPopup/day/9/id/1261627/month/November/ oldAction/Detail/oldModule/Chronical/year/1989 (accessed: 7 February 2014). 9. My interview with Günther Schabowski, Berlin, 3 December 2007. 10. My interview with Günther Schabowski, Berlin, 3 December 2007. 11. For the German text of ‘Schabowskis Zettel,’ the government mea- sure, see http://www.chronik-der-mauer.de/index.php/de/Start/Detail/id/ 618085/page/23 (accessed: 7 February 2014). 12. For Schabowski’s handwritten notes on the order of the agenda at the press briefing (in German), see a PDF file under the title ‘Schabowskis handschriftlicher Fahrplan at http://www.google.co.uk/url? sa= t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source= web&cd=1&ved=0CCEQFjAA&url=http% 3A% 2F%2Fwww.chronik-der-mauer.de%2Fsystem% 2Ffiles%2Fdokument _pdf%2F54241_cdm-891109-fahrplan.pdf&ei=YASVVc3EBYGvsQGP2pG IDA&usg= AFQjCNHr5SYM6EbF8WMq3yRjaOHzWqCyDA&sig2=vIxKIoW yuED7Ph1s5fp 4CA&bvm=bv.96952980,d.ZGU (accessed: 7 February 2014). 192 Notes 193 13. My interview with Günther Schabowski, Berlin, 3 December 2007. 14. The report on the ‘mysterious phone call’ was for the first time made pub- lic by German TV news broadcaster MDR on 19 April 2009 http://www .daserste.de/ttt/sendung_dyn∼datum,19.04.2009∼cm.asp (report no longer available). Cf. a Spiegel Online (in German) article on the same topic: Grothe and Kloth, 2009 http://einestages.spiegel.de/static/topicalbumbackground/ 3990/bei_anruf_mauerfall.html (accessed: 7 February 2014) and a Time arti- cle (in English) Kirchner, 2009 http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0, 8599,1892408,00.html (accessed: 7 February 2014). 15. See also Kirchner (2009) at http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0, 8599,1892408,00.html (accessed: 7 February 2014). 16. The Time article at http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171, 969637,00.html (accessed: 7 February 2014). See also New York Times, Schmemann, 1990 at http://www.nytimes.com/1990/02/13/world/ upheaval-east-2-german-chiefs-prepare-meet-steamroller-vs-lame-duck.html (accessed: 7 February 2014). 17. The text is also available at http://www.ddr89.de/ddr89/d/modrow.html (accessed: 7 February 2014). 18. My interview with Hans Modrow, Berlin, 28 November 2007. Cf. Modrow (1999, p. 419). 19. My interview with Rudolf Seiters, Berlin, 28 June 2009. 20. My interviews with Christian Tuschhoff, Berlin, 8 August 2007 and Gert- Joachim Glässner, Berlin, 7 November 2007. 21. For the German text of Kohl’s speech, see Kohl (1989b) at http://www .2plus4.de/chronik.php3?date_value=10.11.89&sort=000-003 (accessed: 7 February 2014). 22. My interview with Dietrich von Kyaw, Berlin, 7 August 2007. 23. My interview with Martin Klingst, Cambridge, MA, 7 December 2006. 24. My interview with Richard von Weizsäcker, Berlin, 27 November 2007. Von Weizsäcker shared with me a story showing how the day after the Berlin Wall came down was confusing for both the West and East German author- ities: President von Weizsäcker decided to walk alone across the Potsdamer Platz to see how he would be received and whether he would be let in and out. When he approached the police station, an East German offi- cer came out, saluted, and said: ‘Herr Bundespräsident, ich melde Ihnen keine besondere Vorkommnisse’ [Nothing extraordinary to report]. Von Weizsäcker commented that East Germans knew his face from TV and sim- ply did not know how to react to a West German president crossing the border. 25. My interview with Matthias Platzeck, Potsdam, 12 December 2007. 26. My interview with Detlev Kraa, Berlin, 31 October 2007. 27. My interviews with Gunter Hofmann, Berlin, 30 July 2007 and Andreas Apelt, Berlin, 23 October 2007. Rainer Eppelmann suggests just 500–800 people in the whole GDR prior to the Leipzig demonstrations (my interview with Rainer Eppelmann, Berlin, 21 November 2007. 28. My interview with Konrad Weiss, Berlin, 29 November 2007. 29. The Rostock branch of NF had a much clearer and stronger line advocating unification by Gauck and others prior to November 1989 (Gauck, 2009, pp.
Recommended publications
  • Inhalt Ernst Röhl, Die Raff-Terroristen Sind Unter Uns
    Inhalt Ernst Röhl, Die Raff-Terroristen sind unter uns ... 8 Werner Rügemer über Josef Ackermann 9 Mathias Wedel über Dieter Althaus 13 Thomas Wieczorek über Mario Barth 17 Peter Köhler über Franz Beckenbauer 19 Werner Rügemer über Roland Berger 23 Wolfgang Seidel über Dagmar Bertges 27 Christina Seidel über Dirk Bettels 30 Hans-Günther Pölitz über die Deutsche Bank 33 Edgar Külow über Jürgen Emig 36 Gerhard Zwerenz über Joachim Fest 38 Hans Wallow über Joseph Fischer 42 Mathias Wedel über Joachim Gauck 48 Peter Köhler über Günter Grass 50 Paul Schabacker über Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg 54 Dagmar Enkelmann über Norbert Hansen 57 Ernst Röhl über Peter Hartz 60 Hansjörg Utzerath über Hans-Olaf Henkel 63 Jeannette Faure über Eva Herman 64 Erhard Preuk über Volker Herres 66 Christina Seidel über Siegfried von Hohenau 68 Sandra Rudnick über Renaldo M. Hopf 70 Ludwig Schumann über Jörg-Dietrich Hoppe 74 Peter Köhler über Wolfgang Huber 78 Ernst Röhl über Günther Jauch 81 Jürgen Roth über Hans-Ulrich Jorges 83 Reinhard Limbach über Jörg Kachelmann 87 Werner Rügemer über Susanne Klatten 89 Matthias Biskupek über Hubertus Knabe 93 Kurt Wünsch über Horst Köhler 95 Peter Köhler über Kristina Köhler 98 Ernst Röhl über Günther Krause 101 Werner Rügemer über Matthias von Krockow 104 Erhard Preuk über Vera Lengsfeld 108 Jürgen Roth über Philipp Mißfelder 109 Edgar Külow über Wilfried Mohren 112 Bibliografische Informationen digitalisiert durch http://d-nb.info/994503466 Paul Schabacker über Franz Müntefering 115 Christoph Hofrichter über Günther Oettinger 120 Reinhard Limbach über Hubertus Pellengahr 122 Stephan Krull über Ferdinand Piëch 123 Ernst Röhl über Heinrich von Pierer 127 Paul Schabacker über Papst Benedikt XVI.
    [Show full text]
  • From Points of View of Monetary Integration Maturity) 1
    THE EURO AND CENTRAL EUROPE (FROM POINTS OF VIEW OF MONETARY INTEGRATION MATURITY) 1 TIBOR PALANKAI1 1Emeritus Professor of Corvinus University of Budapest E-mail:[email protected] The paper discusses the frameworks and development of the introduction of the Euro in Central Europe, with a focus on pre-entry countries (Czechia, Hungary, Poland, Romania and Croatia). The main elements of monetary integration maturity are the state of real-integration (possibilities of large saving in transaction costs), meeting the criteria of functioning market economy and the single market; macro-economic stability and meeting the Maastricht criteria; and shortcomings of absorption (integration) capacities of the EU. Controversial questions are also discussed, such as requirements concerning inflation, the budget deficit or exchange rate stability. The paper argues that the countries under scrutiny show diverging courses of action and policies, public support is also unclear, and the interests of TNCs and political elites contradict each other. Cultural, legal, security or emotional factors will pay a key role in eventual adoption, and prospects also depend on the solution of the current debt and migration crises. Keywords: Euro and Central Europe, monetary maturity, diverging interests, attitudes, policies, and prospects. JEL-codes: F2, F3 1. FRAMEWORK OF MONETARY INTEGRATION FOR THE CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPEAN NEW MEMBERS The full EU membership of CEE countries assumes their full EMU participation. This corresponds to the Copenhagen accession criteria, namely they should have the “ability to take on the obligations of membership, including adherence to the aims of political, economic and monetary union”. They have no possibility of opting out, like the United Kingdom and Denmark.
    [Show full text]
  • The GDR Opposition Archive
    The GDR Opposition Archive in the Robert Havemann Society The GDR Opposition Archive in the Robert Havemann Society holds the largest accessible collection of testaments to the protest against the SED dictatorship. Some 750 linear metres of written material, 180,000 photos, 5,000 videos, 1,000 audio cassettes, original banners and objects from the years 1945 to 1990 all provide impressive evidence that there was always contradiction and resistance in East Germany. The collection forms a counterpoint and an important addition to the version of history presented by the former regime, particularly the Stasi files. Originally emerging from the GDR’s civil rights movement, the archive is now known beyond Germany itself. Enquiries come from all over Europe, the US, Canada, Australia and Korea. Hundreds of research papers, radio and TV programmes, films and exhibitions on the GDR have drawn on sources from the collection. Thus, the GDR Opposition Archive has made a key contribution to our understanding of the communist dictatorship. Testimonials on opposition and resistance against the communist dictatorship The GDR Opposition Archive is run by the Robert Havemann Society. It was founded 26 years ago, on 19 November 1990, by members and supporters of the New Forum group, including prominent GDR opposition figures such as Bärbel Bohley, Jens Reich, Sebastian Pflugbeil and Katja Havemann. To this day, the organisation aims to document the history of opposition and resistance in the GDR and to ensure it is not forgotten. The Robert Havemann Society has been funded entirely on a project basis since its foundation. Its most important funding institutions include the Berlin Commissioner for the Stasi Records and the Federal Foundation for the Reappraisal of the SED Dictatorship.
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy and Human Development in the Broader Middle East
    Istanbul Papers Democracy and Human Development in the Broader Middle East: A Transatlantic Strategy for Partnership The Istanbul Papers were presented at: Istanbul Paper #1 The Atlantic Alliance at a New Crossroads Istanbul, Turkey A conference of: June 25 – 27, 2004 TURKıSH ECONOMıC AND SOCıAL STUDıES FOUNDATıON Core sponsorship: Additional support from: The German Marshall Fund TESEV TURKıSH ECONOMıC AND of the United States Bankalar Cad. No:2 K:3 SOCıAL STUDıES 1744 R Street, NW 34420 Karaküy/Istanbul FOUNDATıON Washington, DC 20009 T 212 292 89 03 T 1 202 745 3950 F 212 292 90 45 F 1 202 265 1662 W www.tesev.org.tr E [email protected] W www.gmfus.org Democracy and Human Development in the Broader Middle East: A Transatlantic Strategy for Partnership Istanbul Paper #1 i ii Authors* Urban Ahlin, Member of the Swedish Parliament Mensur Akgün, Turkish Economic and Social Science Studies Foundation Gustavo de Aristegui, Member of the Spanish Parliament Ronald D. Asmus, The German Marshall Fund of the United States Daniel Byman, Georgetown University Larry Diamond, Hoover Institution Steven Everts, Centre for European Reform Ralf Fücks, Heinrich Böll Foundation Iris Glosemeyer, Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik Jana Hybaskova, Czech Member of the European Parliament Thorsten Klassen, The German Marshall Fund of the United States Mark Leonard, Foreign Policy Centre Michael McFaul, Stanford University Thomas O. Melia, Georgetown University Michael Mertes, Dimap Consult Joshua Muravchik, American Enterprise Institute Kenneth M. Pollack, The Brookings Institution Karen Volker, Office of Senator Joe Lieberman Jennifer Windsor, Freedom House * The views expressed in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of, and should not be attributed to, the authors’ affiliation.
    [Show full text]
  • German-Russian Natural Gas Relations in the Context of a Common European Energy Policy
    Graduate School of Social Sciences (GSSS) German-Russian natural gas relations in the context of a common European energy policy Thesis to obtain the academic title of Master of Science (MS) in the program Political Science (International Relations) Academic year 2018/2019 Date of submission: June 21st 2019 Author: Caspar M. Henke (12299804) Supervisor: Dr. Mehdi P. Amineh Second Reader: Dr. Henk W. Houweling Research Project: The Political Economy of Energy Abstract This thesis analyses the interwoven commercial and political fabric of German-Russian natural gas relations. A theoretical lens that combines liberalist interdependence theory and the critical theoretical concepts of the state-society complex and social networks against the background of selected energy security dimensions will be employed. It will be argued that in order to assess the prospects for a common European Union energy policy, it is crucial to understand the importance of social forces and external relations shaping the energy policy of EU member states vis-á-vis the Russian Federation. It will be highlighted how the different perceptions of Russian natural gas as a political tool and a commercial commodity have resulted in different actors taking the lead in the natural gas strategies of the European Commission, the Central and Eastern European member states, and Germany. Portraying the Russian state-society complex of natural gas, it will be concluded that the German commercial-led approach is not compatible with a European Union energy policy that responds to the geopolitical threats of Russian gas perceived by other member states. Key words: Natural Gas, Russia, Germany, European Union, State-society complex 2 AcKnowledgements I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my thesis supervisor Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Gründungsaufruf Des Kuratoriums Für Einen Demokratisch Verfassten Bund Der Länder
    Am 16. Juni 1990 hat sich im Reichstag, Berlin, Das Kuratorium ist ein Forum für eine breite das KURATORIUM FÜR EINEN DEMOKRA- öffentliche Verfassungsdiskussion, eine TISCH VERFASSTEN BUND DEUTSCHER LÄN- Verfassunggebende Versammlung und für DER gegründet und folgenden Gründungsauf- eine gesamtdeutsche Verfassung mit Volks- ruf verabschiedet: entscheid. Um diesen Forderungen Nach- „Das KURATORIUM FÜR EINEN DEMOKRA- druck zu verleihen, führen wir eine Unter- TISCH VERFASSTEN BUND DEUTSCHER LÄN- schriftensammlung durch und rufen auf, DER hat sich gebildet, um eine breite öffentliche Ver- sich daran aktiv zu beteiligen. fassungsdiskussion zu fördern, deren Ergebnisse in eine Verfassunggebende Versammlung einmünden sol- „Ich will, daß die Menschen in der B R D und in der len. Auf der Basis des Grundgesetzes für die Bundes- D D R ihr politisches Zusammenleben selbst gestalten republik Deutschland, unter Wahrung der in ihm ent- und darüber in einer Volksabstimmung entscheiden haltenen Grundrechte und unter Berücksichtigung können. Die wichtigsten Weichenstellungen für die des Verfassungsentwurfs des Runden Tisches für die neue deutsche Republik dürfen nicht über die Köpfe DDR, soll eine neue gesamtdeutsche Verfassung aus- der Menschen hinweg getroffen werden. gearbeitet werden. Wir setzen uns dafür ein, daß die Deshalb muß unter Beteiligung der Bürgerinnen und Einberufung einer Verfassunggebenden Versammlung Bürger eine Verfassung ausgearbeitet und ,von dem zwischen der Bundesrepublik Deutschland und der deutschen Volke in freier Entscheidung beschlossen' Deutschen Demokratischen Republik verbindlich werden (Art. 146 GG). Diese Verfassung darf nicht festgeschrieben und die neue gesamtdeutsche Verfas- hinter das Grundgesetz der Bunderepublik Deutsch- sung von den Bürgerinnen und Bürgern durch Volks- land zurückfallen. Sie bietet vielmehr die Chance, entscheid angenommen wird." (verabschiedet auf der den hinzugekommenen Aufgaben entsprechend, die Gründungssitzung des Kuratoriums am 16.
    [Show full text]
  • The Czech Foreign Policy in the Asia Pacific
    CHAPTER 11 Chapter 11 The Czech Foreign Policy in the Asia Pacific IMPROVING BALANCE, MOSTLY UNFULFILLED POTENTIAL Rudolf Fürst, Alica Kizeková, David Kožíšek Executive Summary: The Czech relations with the People’s Republic of China (PRC, hereinafter referred to as China) have again generated more interest than ties with other Asian nations in the Asia Pacific in 2017. A disagreement on the Czech-China agenda dominated the political and media debate, while more so- phisticated discussions about the engagement with China were still missing. In contrast, the bilateral relations with the Republic of Korea (ROK) and Japan did not represent a polarising topic in the Czech public discourse and thus remained largely unpoliticised due to the lack of interest and indifference of the public re- garding these relations. Otherwise, the Czech policies with other Asian states in selected regions revealed balanced attitudes with both proactive and reactive agendas in negotiating free trade agreements, or further promoting good relations and co-operation in trade, culture, health, environment, science, academia, tour- ism, human rights and/or defence. BACKGROUND AND POLITICAL CONTEXT In 2017, the Czech foreign policy towards the Asia Pacific1 derived from the Concept of the Foreign Policy of the Czech Republic,2 which referred to the region as signifi- cant due to the economic opportunities it offered. It also stated that it was one of the key regions of the world due to its increased economic, political and security-related importance. Apart from the listed priority countries – China, Japan, and South Korea, as well as India – the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and the re- gion of Central Asia are also mentioned as noteworthy in this government document.
    [Show full text]
  • Plenarprotokoll 15/56
    Plenarprotokoll 15/56 Deutscher Bundestag Stenografischer Bericht 56. Sitzung Berlin, Donnerstag, den 3. Juli 2003 Inhalt: Begrüßung des Marschall des Sejm der Repu- rung als Brücke in die Steuerehr- blik Polen, Herrn Marek Borowski . 4621 C lichkeit (Drucksache 15/470) . 4583 A Begrüßung des Mitgliedes der Europäischen Kommission, Herrn Günter Verheugen . 4621 D in Verbindung mit Begrüßung des neuen Abgeordneten Michael Kauch . 4581 A Benennung des Abgeordneten Rainder Tagesordnungspunkt 19: Steenblock als stellvertretendes Mitglied im a) Antrag der Abgeordneten Dr. Michael Programmbeirat für die Sonderpostwert- Meister, Friedrich Merz, weiterer Ab- zeichen . 4581 B geordneter und der Fraktion der CDU/ Nachträgliche Ausschussüberweisung . 4582 D CSU: Steuern: Niedriger – Einfa- cher – Gerechter Erweiterung der Tagesordnung . 4581 B (Drucksache 15/1231) . 4583 A b) Antrag der Abgeordneten Dr. Hermann Zusatztagesordnungspunkt 1: Otto Solms, Dr. Andreas Pinkwart, weiterer Abgeordneter und der Fraktion Abgabe einer Erklärung durch den Bun- der FDP: Steuersenkung vorziehen deskanzler: Deutschland bewegt sich – (Drucksache 15/1221) . 4583 B mehr Dynamik für Wachstum und Be- schäftigung 4583 A Gerhard Schröder, Bundeskanzler . 4583 C Dr. Angela Merkel CDU/CSU . 4587 D in Verbindung mit Franz Müntefering SPD . 4592 D Dr. Guido Westerwelle FDP . 4596 D Tagesordnungspunkt 7: Krista Sager BÜNDNIS 90/ a) Erste Beratung des von den Fraktionen DIE GRÜNEN . 4600 A der SPD und des BÜNDNISSES 90/ DIE GRÜNEN eingebrachten Ent- Dr. Guido Westerwelle FDP . 4603 B wurfs eines Gesetzes zur Förderung Krista Sager BÜNDNIS 90/ der Steuerehrlichkeit DIE GRÜNEN . 4603 C (Drucksache 15/1309) . 4583 A Michael Glos CDU/CSU . 4603 D b) Erste Beratung des von den Abgeord- neten Dr. Hermann Otto Solms, Hubertus Heil SPD .
    [Show full text]
  • The Jewish Contribution to the European Integration Project
    The Jewish Contribution to the European Integration Project Centre for the Study of European Politics and Society Ben-Gurion University of the Negev May 7 2013 CONTENTS Welcoming Remarks………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………1 Dr. Sharon Pardo, Director Centre for the Study of European Politics and Society, Jean Monnet National Centre of Excellence at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev Walther Rathenau, Foreign Minister of Germany during the Weimar Republic and the Promotion of European Integration…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………3 Dr. Hubertus von Morr, Ambassador (ret), Lecturer in International Law and Political Science, Bonn University Fritz Bauer's Contribution to the Re-establishment of the Rule of Law, a Democratic State, and the Promotion of European Integration …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………8 Mr. Franco Burgio, Programme Coordinator European Commission, Brussels Rising from the Ashes: the Shoah and the European Integration Project…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………13 Mr. Michael Mertes, Director Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, Israel Contributions of 'Sefarad' to Europe………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………21 Ambassador Alvaro Albacete, Envoy of the Spanish Government for Relations with the Jewish Community and Jewish Organisations The Cultural Dimension of Jewish European Identity………………………………………………………………………………….…26 Dr. Dov Maimon, Jewish People Policy Institute, Israel Anti-Semitism from a European Union Institutional Perspective………………………………………………………………34
    [Show full text]
  • The EU's Normative Power
    The EU’s Normative Power – Its Greatest Strength or its Greatest Weakness? By Tornike Metreveli The Starting Point The growing influence of the European Union (EU) on the international political arena and at the same time its “particular kind” of characteristics as an international player appears to be a widely debated issue among various scholars of social sciences over the last decades. During this period a wide range of theories and concepts have attributed various epithets to the EU and tried to explain its power in different, sometimes controversial ways. Consequently the descriptions of the EU in international relations vary from it being a “Kantian paradise” (Kagan, 2004), a “vanishing mediator” (Manners, 2006:.174) to “an economic giant, a political dwarf, and a military worm” (Eyskens, 1991). For some scholars the concept of the EU goes beyond the bold epithets and is analyzed from the critical-social theoretical perspective, where the latter was hypothesized as an actor that spread its own norms beyond its borders and whose power lies in its system of values and forms of relations with the outer world (Manners, 2002). Having said this, the article tries to focus on this theoretical approach while addressing this “unique political animal” (Piris, 2010: 337). Thus, the concept pioneered by Ian Manners, particularly the idea of Europe’s “normative power” (NPE hereafter), is the central point of departure of this paper; and the critical analysis of its greatest strengths and weaknesses is the article’s main objective. Divided in three parts, the paper firstly focuses on the conceptual analysis of the NPE, and its definitions.
    [Show full text]
  • Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift
    © Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; www.zobodat.at Mitgliederliste. A. Ehrenmitglieder. 1881 Bedel, L., 20 nie de l'Odeon, Paris. 1881 Brunne r v. Wattenwyl, k. k. Ministerialrat, Wien, Lerchenfelderstr. 28. 1907 Forel, Prof. Dr. Aug., Yvorne, Waadt, Schweiz. 1905 Gestro, Dr. R. , Dir. Mus. Civ. di Storia Nat., Genua, Italien. 1887 Heller, Prof. Dr. K. M., Dresden, Franklinstr. 22. 1881 v. Hey den, Prof. Dr. Lucas, Major a. D. , Bockenheim bei Frankfurt a. M., Schlofsstr. 54. 1909 Kolbe, Prof. H. J. , Kgl. Zoolog. Museum, Berlin N. 4, Invalidenstr. 43. 1881 K o 1 1 z e , W., Kaufmann, Hamburg 1, Glockengiefserwall 9. 1881 Reitter, Edm., Kaiserl. Rat, Paskau, Mähren. 1881 v. Seidlitz, Dr. Georg, Privatgelehrter, Ebenhausen bei München. 1881 Sharp, Dr. David, Lawnside , Brockenhurst, Hants., England. B. Ordentliche Mitglieder und Abonnenten. : 1906 Ahlwarth, K. , Lehrer, Berlin N. 58, Carmen Sylva- strafse 163. {Col. aquatic.) 1909 Alfken, J. D., Bremen, Delmestr. 18. (Apid.) 1909 Andre, E., 17 rue Victor Hugo, Gray (Haute-Saone). 1906 Andrewes, H. E., Highgate, 8 North Grove, London N. 1911 Anhaltische Entomologische Vereinigung, Dessau (Adresse : E. Heidenreich, Friedrichstr. 2). 1910 Apfelbeck, Victor, Custos am Bosn. Herzegow. Landes- Museum, Sarajewo, Bosnien. 1908 Rev. Dr. Afsmuth, Jos., Bombay (Fort.), Cruickshark Road, St. Xavier's College. Die Berliner Mitglieder sind mit einem * bezeichnet. Deutsche Entomol. Zeitschrift 1913. Heft I. I . © Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; www.zobodat.at II* Deutsch. Ent. Zeitschr. 1913. *1910 Aul mann, Dr. Georg, Berlin N. 4 , Invaüdenstr. 43, Königl. Zoolog. Museum. 1909 Bachmetjew, Dr. P. , Professor an der Universität, Sofia, Bulgarien.
    [Show full text]
  • German Post-Socialist Memory Culture
    8 HERITAGE AND MEMORY STUDIES Bouma German Post-Socialist MemoryGerman Culture Post-Socialist Amieke Bouma German Post-Socialist Memory Culture Epistemic Nostalgia FOR PRIVATE AND NON-COMMERCIAL USE AMSTERDAM UNIVERSITY PRESS German Post-Socialist Memory Culture FOR PRIVATE AND NON-COMMERCIAL USE AMSTERDAM UNIVERSITY PRESS Heritage and Memory Studies This ground-breaking series examines the dynamics of heritage and memory from a transnational, interdisciplinary and integrated approaches. Monographs or edited volumes critically interrogate the politics of heritage and dynamics of memory, as well as the theoretical implications of landscapes and mass violence, nationalism and ethnicity, heritage preservation and conservation, archaeology and (dark) tourism, diaspora and postcolonial memory, the power of aesthetics and the art of absence and forgetting, mourning and performative re-enactments in the present. Series Editors Ihab Saloul and Rob van der Laarse, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands Editorial Board Patrizia Violi, University of Bologna, Italy Britt Baillie, Cambridge University, UK Michael Rothberg, University of Illinois, USA Marianne Hirsch, Columbia University, USA Frank van Vree, NIOD and University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands FOR PRIVATE AND NON-COMMERCIAL USE AMSTERDAM UNIVERSITY PRESS German Post-Socialist Memory Culture Epistemic Nostalgia Amieke Bouma Amsterdam University Press FOR PRIVATE AND NON-COMMERCIAL USE AMSTERDAM UNIVERSITY PRESS Cover illustration: Kalter Abbruch Source: Bernd Kröger, Adobe Stock Cover
    [Show full text]