DOCSLIB.ORG

Generalassembly Di Slr

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Generalassembly Di Slr JNITED 'lATloNs GeneralAssembly Di slr . GM{ENAL A/ 42/'t s7 17 November 19 87 ORIGINAL: E}{GLISH Forty-second segsion Agenda iten 69 RXLATIONSHIP BEI\^IEEN DISARMAIENT AND DEVETOPMENT Reoort of the First Comnitlee Rapporteur: Mr. Kazinierz TOMASZEWSKI (Poland) I. INTRODUCT I ON 1. The iten entitled ,,Relati.onship between Disarnanent and Development: report of the Internationai Conference on the Retationship betl'reen Disarnament and Development" was included in the provisional agenda of the forty-second session in accordance \,rt th General Assembly decislon 4l,/ 422 of 4 Decenber 1986' 2. At its 3rd plenary meeting, on 18 Septernber 1987' the General Asserd)lyr on Lhe reconrnendalion of the General colTwritteer decided to include the item in its agenda and to aflocate it to the First Connittee. 3. At its 2nd meeting, on 1 october. the First Comnittee decided to hoLd a {rcner^'t ,tabatc on the d'isarnanent itens aLlocated to it. nanely, items 48 lo 69. the folLol^red by sLatements on specific disarmanent agenda itqns and continuation of generaL debate, u= t"a"""u.y. The deli.berations on those items took place bet!''een the 3rd and the 3lst meetingsr frorn 12 October to 3 November lsee MC'L/42/PV'3-31)' 4. In connection wlth item 69, lhe First Comnittee had before it the folLowlng docume nts : (a) Letter dated 14 APril 1987 fron the Permanent Representative of the Union of Soviet Socialj.st Republics to the United Nations addressed to the secr e tary-ce net aI (A/ 42/228-SlL8811) t a7 -29'7 gr 0560P (E) A/ 42 /157 English Page 2 {b) Note ver}laLe dated 16 June 1987 fron the permanent Mission of Mozanbique to the United Nations addressed ta the Secre!ary-CenerdI, transmitting Lhe text of the final con[nuniqu6 of the VII Sumlit Conference of the Heads of State of AngoLa, Cape Verde, Guinea-Bissau, l"loz amtl ique and Sao Torue and principe. held at Maputo on 22 r4ay 1987 @/ a2/352-s/L9930l i (c) Letter daled L2 June L987 from the Permanent Representative of the cerman Denocracic Republic to the United Nations addrpssed Lo the Secretdry-General, transmitting the document on t.ne efimination af und erd eve lopme nt and lhe establishment of a new inlernational econonic order adopted at lhe session of the Political Consultative Con]Inittee of the States parties to the Warsaw Treaty, he lal af BerLin on 2B and 29 May 1987 (A/ 42/35 4-E/ 1987 /LAct) i {d) Letter dated l5 July 19Bi f rorq Ehe permanenr RepresentaLLve ot [,laf aysia to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-ceneral, transmitting the texl of the finaL statenent of the flfth session of the InterAction Council, held at Kuala Lurnpur fror Lq Lo 2l April 1981 tA/42/407)i {e) tetter dated 6 JuLy L9B7 fron the Permanent Representative of Zinrbabwe to toe United NaLions addressed Lo the Secrerary-ceneral, trdnsmitting the text oI the pyongyang Declaration and plan of Action on Scuth-South Co-operation, adopted by ihe Extraordinary Minislerial Conference of Non-ALigned Countries on South-South Co'operation. held at pyongyang, Denocratic people's Republic of Korea. frorn 9 to 13 June 1987 {P,/ 42/ 4L!} i {f) tetter daled 23 JuIy 1987 frorn the permanent Representative of the Union .f s.'uiaf s,r.i,al iqt Ranriblics to the United Natlons addressed to the Secre tary-cene( aI lA/42/4L8-S,r18994) ; (S) I-etter dated 13 August 198? fron the Pernanent Representative of Thail"and to the UniEed Narions addressed Eo the Secretary-Genera l. transmittinq the text of excerpts frorn the Joint Coiru'ouniqu6 of the Twentieth ASEAN Minlsterial Meeting, held in singapore on l5 and 16 June I9B'7 tA/42/47'/ -sl19048); (h) Letler dated g October 1987 f ror0 the pernanent Repr e sent.at ive s of Argentina, Greece, India, Mexico. S\,ieden and the United Republic of Tanzania to the JIlited Nations addressed to the SecreLary-General. transmittinq the text of the joint statement issued on 7 October L9B'1 by the President of Argentina, the Prime Minister of Greece, the Prime l"linister of India, the president of Mexico, the prime Mlnister of Sweden and lhe First President of the United Republic of Tanzania lA/ 42/652-s/1920I) i (i) Letter dated 19 October L987 from the permanent Representative of Canada io f,he Un.iced NaLions adCressed to the Secretary-ceneraL, transmitting the Vancouver DecLaration on World Trade, the Okanagait Statenent on Southern Africa and FrogramTre of Action. and the cc,nmuniqu6 of the Meeting of the ComrnonweaLth Heads of Gcvernment, held at Vanccuver: fram 13 to 17 October \g\j @/42/611) J (j) Letter dated 23 October 1987 from the Permanent Representative of z-Lmbabwe Lo the United NdLio"]s addressed to Ehe Secrerary-GeneraL, transm-itting a A/ 4 2 /'157 Engli sh Page 3 copy of the final communiqu6 of the l"leeting of Ministers for Foreign Affairs and Heads of Delegation of the Movement of Non-Aligned Countries to the forty-second session of the General Assenbly, heLd in New York from 5 to 7 october 1987 (A/a2/68L), (k) Letter dated 2 November L987 from the Permanent Representative of Czechoslovakia to the united Nations addressed Lo the Secretary-General, transnitting the comnuniqu6 and the docunent entitled "Towards IncreaEing the EffecLiveness of the Conference on Di,sarmament in Geneva" issued at the session of the committee of the Ministers for Foreign Affairs of the states menbers of Lhe I,larsair Treaty, held at Prague on 28 and 29 October LgB'l lA/42/708 and Corr.L) i (1) Letter dated 5 November l9B7 fron the Permanent Representative of the Union of Soviet Socialist RepubLics to the United Nations addressed to the Secr etar y-Gen er aI (A/ 42/'71.5-s/I92521 . II. CONSIDERATION OF DRAFT RESOLUTICN A/C.L/42/L.74 5. On 27 October 1987, Cameroon, Canada. Cuba. France. lhe German Dernocratrc RepubLic. India. lndonesia, Nigeria, Norway, Venezuela and Yugoslavia submitted a draft resolution, entitled "Relationship between Disarnament and Developnent" (A/C.\/42/L.74), v/hlch \.ras later aLso sponsored by Austral.ia, Bolivia. the Congo, Greece, New Zealand, Romani"a and Rwanda. The draft resolution was introduced by the representative of India at the 32nd neeting. on 4 November. 6 rn fhie i^r t\a se,-rpF:rv-Cp-rarFl qrlbmitted on the ^^nna.t a statenent progranne budget implicalions of the draft resoLution (A/c.1/42/L.83). 7. At. its 44th meet.inq, on 16 November, Lhe Comrnittee adopled draft resolution A/C.L/42/1,.'74 without a vote (see para. B). TIi. RECOMMENDATION OF THB ITIRST COMMITTEE 8. The First conunittee recomnends to the General Assernblv the adoption of the following draft r esolution r Relationship between disarmament and developnent The ceneral Assenbly, Recallinq its resol.utions 38/7I B of L5 Decenber t9B3r 39/160 of fZ n""*mnl?-Td8 4 and 40/155 of 16 Decenber 1985f iLs decision 40/4'13 of. 20 June 1986 and its decision 4L/422 of 4 Decenber 1986. A/ 42 /15'l Engl l sh Page 4 Recalling the provisions of the Final Docunent ot the Tenth SpeciaL Session of the GeneraL AssembLy, 1/ the first special session devoted to disarnanent. related to the relationship betvreen disarmament and development. Stressing that the holding of the International Conference on lhe Relationship betlieen Disarmament and Development in New York fron 24 Augusl to 11 September 1987 constituted a significant developrent in the proc-'ss of the muLti Lateral review, at a poLitical Leve L, of the relaEionship between disarmament and deveLopment, t. l'lelcomes the adoption of the Final Docurnent of the International Conference on the ReLationship between Disarmament and Developmenti 2,/ 2. Decides to have the report of the Conference brought to the attention of the Preparatory Con'nittee for the Third Special Session of the General Asselrbly DevoteC co Disarmament i 3. Requests tl'lat Cominittee to include in the agenda of the third special session of thc Ceneral Assembly devoted to disarnament an 1l--m enti',1ed "Relationship betneen Cisarmament and develoFnent. in the liqht of the action prografiTne adopted at the Tnternational Conference"i 3/ 4. Requests the Secretary-General Lo take action through the appropridLe organs, wirhin avai labie rescrrces, for the inplen'entation of the OU L IUII PLUYI - . dUUl./LTUAd..l6,l nr fha rnfarni.ional Conference. L/ Resolut ion S-L} /2, 2/ A/CONF. 13 0/3 9 . 1/ Ibid.. para. 35,.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • North Korea: a Chronology of Events from 2016 to 2020
    North Korea: A Chronology of Events from 2016 to 2020 May 5, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46349 North Korea: A Chronology of Events from 2016 to 2020 Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Chronology ...................................................................................................................................... 3 1994 ........................................................................................................................................... 3 1998 ........................................................................................................................................... 3 2003 ........................................................................................................................................... 4 2005 ........................................................................................................................................... 4 2006 ........................................................................................................................................... 4 2007 ........................................................................................................................................... 5 2009 ........................................................................................................................................... 5 2011 ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Begun Is Half Done Prospects for US-North Korea Nuclear Diplomacy
    Begun is Half Done Prospects for US-North Korea Nuclear Diplomacy February 2019 By Catherine Killough Catherine Killough is the Roger L. Hale Fellow at the Ploughshares Fund, where she focuses on North Korea’s nuclear and missile development. She is involved in efforts to promote diplomatic solutions to the US-North Korea nuclear crisis, and to encourage greater engagement between the two countries. Prior to joining Ploughshares Fund, Catherine interned at the State Department Office of Korean Affairs and the National Committee on North Korea. She has a Master’s degree in Asian Studies from the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University, where she specialized in the politics and security of Korea. Acknowledgements I would like to express my gratitude to Philip Yun for sharing his sharp insights and personal experiences on North Korea with me. I especially thank Tom Collina for his encouragement and guidance throughout the writing of this report. I am also grateful for Joe Cirincione’s tireless mentorship, and for the opportunity to learn from my smart colleagues John Carl Baker, Michelle Dover, Mary Kaszynski, Meghan McCall, and Geoff Wilson. Special thanks to Zack Brown for providing graphics and excellent feedback in the review of the final draft. Finally, I would like to thank Roger L. Hale, who made this report and fellowship at the Ploughshares Fund possible. Ploughshares Fund Study Report No. 4 ©Ploughshares Fund, February 2019 Begun is Half Done Prospects for US-North Korea Nuclear Diplomacy February 2019 By Catherine Killough Executive Summary The United States may be within reach of an agreement A critical review of the US-North Korea negotiation record that could meaningfully advance the denuclearization calls into question the conventional narrative that diplomacy of North Korea and build lasting peace on the Korean has been a categorical failure, that North Korea has always Peninsula.
    [Show full text]
  • North Korea Challenges for the US-Japan Alliance
    North Korea Challenges for the US-Japan Alliance Yuki Tatsumi Editor March 2011 North Korea Challenge for the US–Japan Alliance Yuki Tatsumi Editor March 2011 Copyright © 2010 The Henry L. Stimson Center ISBN: 978-0-9845211-7-3 Cover and book design/layout by Shawn Woodley All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written consent from the Stimson Center. Stimson Center 1111 19th Street, NW, 12th Floor Washington, DC 20036 Telephone: 202.223.5956 Fax: 202.238.9604 www.stimson.org Contents Abbreviations and Acronyms ............................................................................................. iv Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................ vi Preface ............................................................................................................................... vii Ellen Laipson, President and CEO of the Stimson Center Introduction ..........................................................................................................................1 Alan D. Romberg and Yoshihide Soeya Chapter 1: America’s “North Korea Problem” and US–Japan Relations ............................8 Balbina Y. Hwang Chapter 2: North Korea Problems and US–Japan Relations: A View from Japan .............26 Yasuhiro Izumikawa Chapter 3: Japan–US Cooperation on North Korea: Regional Perspectives .....................44 Katsuhisa Furukawa Chapter 4: Regional Factors:
    [Show full text]
  • North Korea: a Phased Negotiation Strategy
    NORTH KOREA: A PHASED NEGOTIATION STRATEGY 1 August 2003 ICG Asia Report N°61 Washington/Brussels 1 August 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................. i I. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................ 1 I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 2 II. THE NORTH KOREAN REGIME.............................................................................. 2 A. THE “DEAR LEADER” ...........................................................................................................2 B. MILITARY POSTURE ..............................................................................................................2 C. ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE....................................................................................................3 D. HUMAN RIGHTS ....................................................................................................................3 III. KOREA’S NUCLEAR ROGRAM: EARLY HISTORY AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK............................................................. 4 A. SOVIET ASSISTANCE .............................................................................................................4 B. THE NPT AND IAEA ............................................................................................................5 C. THE 1991 DENUCLEARISATION DECLARATION .....................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Oct2000 Proof 2
    Japan Information and Culture Center, EMBASSY OF JAPAN SEARCH FOR STABILITY ON THE KOREAN PENINSULA PROVES ELUSIVE North Korea continues to persist with its nuclear and long-range missile development programs, dissemination of weapons of mass destruction and inflammatory rhetoric in defiance of international concerns even after Japan’s attempt to normalize relations by Prime Minister’s visit in late September. This poses a threat to the entire Asian-Pacific region and constitutes grave concerns in the countries of the region. Therefore, Japan, the U.S., South Korea, China and Russia have all been involved in diplomatic efforts to strongly urge North Korea to dismantley their nuclear, so far to no avail. Tokyo and Washington have been working together closely on the issue. ecretary of State, Colin Powell, and Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, hosted Japan’s Minister for Foreign Affairs Yoriko Kawaguchi, and Minister of State for Defense and WINTER 2002 Director General of the Defense Agency, Shigeru Ishiba, in the W S December meeting of the Security Consultative Committee CONTENTS (SCC.) They addressed in particular, North Korea and its program for the development of weapons of mass destruction. The part of the joint The Pyongyang Declaration statement related to North Korea is as follows: In his landmark visit, Koizumi seeks to “The Ministers expressed grave concern about the threat North normalize ties with the enigmatic North. 2 Korea continues to pose to regional security and stability. The Ministers expressed great regret over North Korea’s recent letter to the IAEA and Diplomatic efforts pressed Normalization, trilateral and other talks the public statement that it plans to resume the operation and construction take place on a number of fronts.
    [Show full text]
  • CNS Special Report on North Korean Ballistic Missile Capabilities
    Center for Nonproliferation Studies Monterey Institute of International Studies CNS Special Report on North Korean Ballistic Missile Capabilities March 22, 2006 Recent North Korean flight-tests of a new short-range ballistic missile have reinforced concerns about North Korea’s missile program and its ability to deliver weapons of mass destruction (WMD). North Korea has an array of short- and intermediate-range missile systems that can deliver conventional, chemical and possibly biological payloads. North Korea has not demonstrated the capability to deliver nuclear weapons with its ballistic missiles, but possibly could equip its medium-range Nodong missiles, which can reach Japan, with nuclear warheads. North Korea currently does not have an operational missile that can strike the United States.1 However, U.S. intelligence estimates of the untested Taepodong-2’s range have increased in recent years. According to a former director of the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency, a two-stage Taepodong-2 could theoretically strike “portions of U.S. territory” and a three-stage version could strike “most of the continental United States.”2 At least two other mobile missiles are under development that would increase North Korea’s military capabilities once they are deployed and operational. This special report answers key questions about North Korean ballistic missiles and presents CNS estimates of North Korea’s ballistic missile capabilities. Although North Korea’s cruise missile development poses an increasing threat, this report does not address Pyongyang’s cruise missiles. 1. What can North Korea hit with its ballistic missiles? a) Can North Korean missiles strike the continental United States? North Korea does not currently have an operational missile that can strike the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposals to the Japanese Government Concerning the Denuclearization of North Korea
    FEB. 2020 WORKING GROUP ON NEW INITIATIVES FOR NUCLEAR ENERGY AND NUCLEAR NON-PROLIFERATION SASAKAWA PEACE FOUNDATION Preface The Sasakawa Peace Foundation (SPF) established the International Peace and Security Department in order to contribute to peace and security in Japan, the Asia-Pacific region, and the rest of the world. The department conducts research and makes policy recommendations based on its research. In September 2018, the SPF established the Working Group on New Initiatives for Nuclear Energy and Nuclear Non-Proliferation. The aim of this Working Group is to explore the contributions that Japan can make in the field of global nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation, as a leading nation in the civilian use of nuclear energy and the only country to have been subjected to nuclear bombings. The Working Group started discussions about Japan’s role and the ways in which Japan can contribute internationally. To date, it has conducted research on a wide range of topics, including international management of nuclear fuel, denuclearization of North Korea, and global nuclear disarmament, and it has compiled the results into a sequence of policy recommendations. The first set of recommendations was published as “Proposals to the Japanese Government Concerning International Management of Plutonium—Aiming for reduction in plutonium stocks and adoption of new international norms” in May 2019, and this was delivered to the (then) Minister for Foreign Affairs, Taro Kono, in August 2019. The Working Group has now compiled new policy recommendations on the role of the Japanese government concerning the denuclearization of North Korea (Democratic People's Republic of Korea).
    [Show full text]
  • The Republic of Korea: a Defence and Security Primer
    Today, the Republic of Korea (ROK) is a global economic and Primer Security and A Defence Korea: of The Republic industrial powerhouse and is identified as a world leader in ship- building, motor manufacturing and information technology. South Korea has also developed into a vibrant democracy. Despite all its successes the country remains locked in a deadly stand-off with its northern neighbour. Almost 60 years after the end of the Korean War, issues concerning defence and security remain of pri- mary societal and political importance in South Korea. This report attempts to summarise the ROK’s defence and security sectors. In four chapters the report addresses security policy and politics, defence reform, defence industry and R&D. Main findings in the report are that South Korea’s defence and security sector is in a period of general transition and change. Threat perceptions and the fragility of security on the Korean Peninsula have intensified over the past few years. Political reconsiderations of South Korea’s security and defence policies have raised contentions over the direction of its defence reform process, and how it will be implemented. South Korea’s defence industrial and R&D sector is actively seeking increased independence and profitability. It is however limited in how it can pursue these structural changes. This volume is published as part of the Asia Security Studies programme. The Republic of Korea: Download our other reports at www.foi.se/asia A Defence and Security Primer Kaan Korkmaz and John Rydqvist FOI-R--3427--SE
    [Show full text]
  • 12Th EU - Japan Summit 1-2 May 2003, Athens
    12th EU - Japan Summit 1-2 May 2003, Athens Joint Press Statement Mr Costas Simitis, Prime Minister of Greece, in his capacity as President of the European Council, assisted by the High Representative for the EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy, Mr Javier Solana, and Mr Romano Prodi, President of the European Commission and Mr Junichiro Koizumi, Prime Minister of Japan, met in Athens on 1-2 May 2003 for the 12th Summit between Japan and the European Union. They recognised that bilateral relations, already very good, continued to develop well. In this context, they emphasised that the Action Plan for EU-Japan Co-operation should continue to be implemented actively. They noted the satisfactory results, which had been obtained in the previous year and identified a number of concrete priorities to be advanced by the time of the next Summit – details of these are given in the Annex. They renewed their commitment to foster the development of their strategic partnership; this is based not only on strong economic links, with the EU and Japan together accounting for approximately 40% of world GDP and around 28% of world trade, but also on a rising tempo of political dialogue and cooperation. They reiterated their commitment to enhance their political cooperation and to reinforce their political and strategic partnership, in order to contribute to consolidating peace and stability worldwide, including through undertaking initiatives for the establishment of democracy, rule of law and good governance in international trouble spots. Both sides share the aspiration of bringing the two regions together through the ASEM dialogue process, and reaffirm their willingness to deepen their partnership in political, economic, cultural and other aspects.
    [Show full text]
  • Oeneral A8.Embly Distr
    UNITED NATIONS A ~_ •• 4 .~P .' •• ._.... _ ._. • __ ... _. ......._ •• "._ •• __._ Oeneral A8.embly Distr. GF.NERAL A/42/753 19 November 1987 ORIGINALa ENGLISH Forty-second ResAion Agenda item 65 WORLD DIS~RMAMENT CONFERENCE Report of the First committee Rapporteur. Mr. Kazimierz TOMASZEWSKI iPoland) I• INTRODUCrI ON 1. 'rhe item ent.ltlao "WOJ ld Disarmament Conferencaa report of the Se }retary-General" was incluoed in the proviuionul agenda of the forty-second BQl3Dlon in accordance with General AAElembly roaolution 41/61 of 3 December 1986. 2. At its 3rd plenary meoting, on 18 Soptember 1987, the General Assembly, on the t'ocommondation of the Genoral Committee, decided to include the item in its agenda and to allocate it to the First cornmittoo. 3. At its 2nc'l meeting, on 1 October, the First Committee decided to hold a general debate on tho diBarlT'amont items allocated to it, namely, it-,ems 413 to 69, followed hy statements on specific disarmament ftgend4 i terns and cant inuat ion ot the qen&ral oebate, as necessary. The deliberations on those items took place between tho 3rd and the 31st meetings, from 12 October to 3 Novermer (see A/C.l/42/PV.3-31). 4. In connection with item 65, the First Committee had before it the following documentsl (£I) Report of tho Secretary-GenAral, ant itlp.d "World Di.sarmament Confet:'encft" \A/42/~42 and Add.1), (b) Letter rlated 30 March 1987 from the Permanent Repraoentativ~ of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General, transmitting the text of the concluding documents of the regul~r Resaion of the Committee of Ministers fOL Foreign Affairs of the States parties to the Warsaw Treaty of Friendship, Co-operation and Mutual Assistance, halo in Moscow on 24 and 25 March 198" (A/42/189-S/l8768), 87-30057 O~7lP (E) / ..
    [Show full text]
  • North South Korea Declaration
    North South Korea Declaration rattling.Exhibitory Sometimes and impressive macho Petey Quinn apperceives deepen her whilearpeggios bounding smilingly, Lion inspissatedbut probationary her pygidium Evelyn moulders inconceivably ostensively and kisses or outthinking.endeavours creamily. Augmenting and twilled Chet repackage almost animally, though Hudson harmonizing his panoramas Korean office facing off against north korea to North korea now has adopted diverging approaches have recently established hotline, fellow at truce, smartest opinion is. Custom alerts when new content is added. It has been prominent executed criminals convicted political declaration may declare an option does not get trusted. US must be North leaving South Korea to implement. Trump and Kim Could sideline an End database the Korean War nearly Seven. Korean people responsible for talks, those meetings involving prostitution practice their security, mixed messages are old cold war exercise is criticised for several issues. European countries and regions, with the highest prevalence in Malta, Denmark, England, and Wales. These are soft of guilt most ambitious editorial projects. COPYRIGHT Office of the President. Japan alliance management system on unlike a pandemics, are requesting this part, an important contact your article. SEOUL North Korean leader Kim Jong Un and South Korean. Kim declaration was eradicated from south korea declare a recently reiterated this essay, meaning is true for building. After faking the persona of an heiress, Sorokin reportedly maintained a clean disciplinary record in prison. The parameters and framework conditions of US policy in North Korea have changed fundamentally. It for south hamgyŕng province communist north south korea declaration for each other things are. South Korean men pick up our habit earlier and love more cigarettes per day.
    [Show full text]
  • Korea Relations: North Korea Disables Facilities, but Resists Declaration
    Comparative Connections A Quarterly E-Journal on East Asian Bilateral Relations U.S.-Korea Relations: North Korea Disables Facilities, But Resists Declaration Donald G. Gross, Atlantic Council of the United States Hannah Oh, Holland and Knight LLP North Korea followed through on its Oct. 3 commitment to disable its nuclear facilities this quarter, but resisted giving an “complete and correct” declaration of its nuclear programs. While the disabling actions – which would prevent North Korea from producing nuclear material for at least a year – encouraged U.S. officials, Pyongyang’s unwillingness to declare its uranium enrichment program, in particular, created a potentially major obstacle in the Six-Party Talks. At the end of the quarter, the U.S. faced a diplomatic dilemma: how to incentivize Pyongyang to continue the disabling process, while pressuring North Korea to come clean on its past nuclear activities. Pyongyang insisted it had engaged in “sufficient consultation” with the U.S. on the declaration and threatened to slow down the disabling process until it received more compensation. The election of South Korea’s conservative party candidate, Lee Myung-bak, on Dec. 19 signified that Seoul and Washington will soon likely have a more coordinated policy approach toward North Korea. Lee stressed that he would adopt a “pragmatic” approach and support large-scale South Korean economic assistance to Pyongyang – but only if North Korea first abandons its nuclear program. U.S. and South Korean officials sparred this quarter over Korea’s decision to suspend U.S. beef shipments because of the threat of mad cow disease. They proved unable to resolve this issue, although President Roh Moo- hyun and President-elect Lee pledged to work together to ratify the U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement (FTA) at the upcoming session of the National Assembly in February.
    [Show full text]