DOCSLIB.ORG

Community Consultation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Community Consultation Core Strategy and Development Management Policies Statement of Consultation - Submission October 2012 2 Contents The consultation and involvement process Page 5 Annex 1: Consolidated list of representors 8 Annex 2: Regulation 20 (pre-submission publication) 11 Representations made under Regulation 20 25 (publication consultation, May/July 2012) Annex 4: Regulation 18 (‘Preferred Options’) stage 139 Annex 5: Regulation 18 (‘Issues and Options’) stage 214 Annex 6: Statement of Community Involvement (summary) 235 3 4 The consultation and involvement process The Statement of Community Involvement This was adopted in January 2008, and revised in September of that year to incorporate procedural changes brought in by the 2008 Planning Act. Although the 2008 Act did away with the ‘Issues and Options’ and ‘Preferred Options’ terminology, the former stage had already been set in motion, and it has been considered logical to present the subsequent (2010) consultation as a ‘preferred option’. The SCI sets out a range of consultation and involvement possibilities. In jkeeping with a strategic document, consultation, especially in the later stages, has focused on the methods which the SCI sets out as standard (advertisement of published documents, use of the Council’s web site, and local mass media), along with targeted locality-based meetings – either to invited stakeholder audiences or public ‘drop in’ sessions. The SCI is available on the ldf section of the Council’s web site www.copeland.gov.uk/ldf, and its Executive Summary is at Annex 7 (page ). Early engagement ‘Stakeholder Launch’ events were held in November 2008, one for stakeholders in the Borough and another for external invitees. This set the agenda for further work; the framework of identified issues is set out in an Appendix to the report of the ‘Issues and Options’ stage (page 18). The Issues and Options stage This stage of consultation took place in May to July 2008 and the report of the process is at Annex 6 (page ). The consultation report from that stage, and the summary of responses, are on the LDF pages of the Council’s web site. Policy options set out at that stage were set out with reference to national and regional planning policy, and the circumstances of the Borough. The general policy approach was carried forward from that already expressed in the adopted Local Plan, which at that stage was only two ywars old. In general there was support for this, although opinion was more split with reference to how development should be distributed between Copeland’s settlements. Preferred Options document consultation The ‘Preferred Options’ document was published in May 2010 for consultation in May to July of that year. Alongside publicity in accordance with the Statement of Community Involvement, public meetings were held in Cleator Moor, Egremont, Millom, Seascale and Whitehaven. The report of that stage of consultation is at Annex 5 (page ). In total 467 representations, were received from 77 respondents. Only 60 of these were expressed as objections. About half of the objections have either been accepted, with the plan modified, or have been met (in the Council’s opinion) by clarificatory comment. Others 5 will be addressed in the site allocation process. A few (mostly relating to the nuclear power station proposals) have been overtaken by events or by the introduction of the major infrastructure planning process. Only nine have not been accepted. In addition, over 300 comments were made suggesting amendments. Most of these were made by statutory consultees and by the County Council. The Borough Council has endeavoured to take these suggestions on board and has met, or at least corresponded with, those bodies to agree common positions wherever possible. In total 201 comments have been met, at least in part, by amendments incorporated in the final draft, while 187 were either not accepted or had been superseded by events or by other changes made. Main issues The main area of debate remains around the strategic distribution of development between settlements. The Council remains convinced that it is desirable in the cause of regeneration, and inherently more sustainable, to focus the bulk of development in the four towns. Whilst there is disagreement, there is also broad support for this approach; in response to comments there have been amendments and clarifications to strategic policies, particularly with reference to rural settlement viability and sustainability. The question is looked at in detail in topic papers on housing and employment land. Other key areas of concern relate to nuclear-related development and wind energy. In these instances, policy has to conform to national policy, and in the former case must defer to National Policy Statements and the role of the Major Infrastructure planning process. A full summary of the representations made at that stage, and the Council’s responses, is at Annex 4 (page ). Publication (‘pre-submission draft’) The Core Strategy and Development Management Policies document was published in its final draft form in May 2012, with the consultation period running to mid-July. The number of representation received totalled 148, from 33 representors. The representors included 2 individual members of the public, 11 business (including trade organisations), 12 general consultees (including statutory undertakers), 2 local authorities and 6 parish and town councils. The representations comprise 35 supporting 55 comments suggesting changes 58 objections citing issues of soundness. The representations are summarised, with the Council’s response, at Annex 3 (page 3). 6 Main issues emerging in post-publication representations Of the objections thirty came from Parish Councils. The majority of these are points of detail which can be clarified by factual amendments, or picked up via neighbourhood planning. The main issues of principle arising from objections are whether the plan supports the NPPF presumption in favour of sustaionable development; the lack of a policy concerning out-of-centre retail development; perceived failure to be sufficiently supportive of development enhancing the vitality of rural settlements; whether the plan is unduly negative towards wind turbines. Some of these objections are in effect asking that the plan repeat national policy; the Council will propose minor changes which make it explicit that the policies concerned are supportive of national policy or that, where they are silent, decisions will be made according to national policy. Where wording has been interpreted as negative, this is generally not intended and minor changes will be proposed to deal with that. 7 ANNEX 1 CONSOLIDATED LIST OF REPRESENTORS The responses are listed in the database by respondent ID, as follows. In Annexes 3 and 4, responses are listed by policy theme as far as possible. Respondent Organisation Issues and Preferred ID number Options rep. Options rep. Reg. 20 rep. nos. nos. nos 01 Ministry of Justice I01 02 National Offender Management Service I02 03 CABE I03 04 Friends, Families and Travellers I04 P001 05 Cllr John Jackson I05 06 St Bees Parish Council I06 07 The Coal Authority I07 P002-P006 08 Cumbria Tourism I08 P007-P015, S126 P430-P431 09 Regen NE Copeland I09 P372-P389 10 Mobile Operators Association I10 S101 11 NWDA I11 P016-P030 12 Cumbria Constabulary I12 13 Environment Agency I13 P355-P370, S059 P425 14 Moresby Parish Council I14 P250-P254 15 Age Concern North West Cumbria I15 16 Allerdale Borough Council I16 P263-P265 S060-S066 17 Mr & Mrs Martin (through I17 Gough's Solicitors) 18 Cllr M A McVeigh I18 19 Taylor & Hardy Ltd I19 P352-P354 20 Natural England I20 P435-P452 S056 21 Tesco Stores Ltd I21 S057-S058 22 Ennerdale and Kinniside Parish I22 S077 Council 23 Egremont Town Council I23 S125 24 CGP I24 25 English Heritage I25 P031-P050 26 Highways Agency I26 P051-P073 27 Mr R Mullholland I27 P394-P412 S087-S09 28 Cleator Moor & District Chamber I28 S080-S086 of Trade and Commerce 29 Theatres Trust I29 P074-P078 S100 8 Respondent Organisation Issues and Preferred ID number Options rep. Options rep. Reg. 20 rep. nos. nos. nos 30 Warner Estates (Space North I30 West) 31 4NW I31 P079 -P095 32 Cumbria Wildlife Trust I32 P096-P115 33 RSPB I33 P266 34 United Utilities I34 P371 S095-S099 35 Egremont Estate (through Smiths I35 Gore) 36 Millom Without Parish Council S102-S122 37 Sainsbury's Supermarkets Ltd I37 S030-S037 38 Cumbria County Council I38 P189-P247 S139-S148 39 The National Trust I39 P315-P351 S010-S029 40 Story Group I40 P116-P120 41 Cllr W Skillicorn I41 42 Lamplugh Parish Council I42 43 Gosforth Parish Council I43 44 Dr Clive Narrainen I44 S002 45 Sport England P121-P141 S051-S053 46 GONW P142-P154, P428-P429, P433 47 Mr G Garrett P155-P156, P426-P427 48 Ponsonby Parish Council P157-P158 49 Rhodia UK Ltd P159-P162 50 Mr A Millie P163 51 Sellafield Ltd P164-P168 52 Mr Powe P169 53 Lorna and Mark Ritchie P170 54 Mark Sarrington P171-P172 55 Mr D Jordan P173 56 Mr Kevin Jordan P174 57 Elaine Jordan P175 58 Applied Management P176 59 Paul Skelton P177 60 R L Barlow P178 61 Port Millom P179 62 Invest in Cumbria P180 S087 63 Mr R Curwen P181-187 64 Cllr D Wilson P189 65 Haile and Wilton Parish Council S001 66 Friends of the Lake District P248-P249 9 Respondent Organisation Issues and Preferred ID number Options rep. Options rep. Reg. 20 rep. nos. nos. nos 67 Parton Parish Council P255-P260 68 Howgate Distington Partnership P261 69 F J McLean P262 70 RWE npower P267-P283 71 Cleator Moor Town Council P284-P293 72 Cllr J Hully P294-P304 73 Leconfield Estate P305-P314, S067-S076 P434 74 West Cumbria Land LLP P390-P393 75 Copeland Flood and Coastal S123 Defence Engineer P413-P419 76 Bob Riley P420-P424 77 Ramblers Association P432 78 Renewable UK S003-S009 79 REG Windpower S038-S048 80 NuGeneration Limited S049-S050 81 Northumbria Healthcare NHS S054 Foundation Trust/North Cumbria University Hospitals NHS Trust.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cameron Tait P Post
    TRANSITION Meeting Britain’s energy BY needs together CONSENT Cameron Tait p post ABOUT THE FABIAN SOCIETY The Fabian Society is Britain’s oldest political think tank. Since 1884 the society has played a central role in developing political ideas and public policy on the left. It aims to promote greater equality of power and opportunity; the value of collective public action; a vibrant, tolerant and accountable democracy; citizenship, liberty and human rights; sustainable development; and multilateral international co-operation. Through a wide range of publications and events the society influences political and public thinking, but also provides a space for broad and open-minded debate, drawing on an unrivalled external network and its own expert research and analysis. Its programme offers a unique breadth, encompassing national conferences and expert seminars; periodicals, books, reports and digital communications; and commissioned and in-house research and comment. The Society is alone among think tanks in being a democratically-constituted membership organisation, with almost 7,000 members. Over time our membership has included many of the key thinkers on the British left and every Labour prime minister. Today we count over 200 parliamentarians in our number. The voluntary society includes 70 local societies, the Fabian Women’s Network and the Young Fabians, which is itself the leading organisation on the left for young people to debate and influence political ideas. The society was one of the original founders of the Labour party and is constitutionally affiliated to the party. We are however editorially, organisationally and financially independent and work with a wide range of partners from all political persuasions and none.
    [Show full text]
  • Agecroft in Steam
    ( ?I ~- - - ~"~ _., -- ........... / -- . , ·--....., __ t) \ ,-- The 1960's saw a dramatic change m the use of The 'A' station system was abandoned early m steam locomotion in the North West of 1947 as construction of 'B' station cooling to Cl!Jton Junc1:c'n ) England. Within the short space of 8 years the towers severed the line. Between then and its QI✓ . familiar sight of a steam-hauled train closure the 'A' station received coal by road. {not all 1he rm,ways shown exi~ad al the some time vanished completely from British Rail. For a A Stallon .,:· :·, ,: ' _::' .·. ·-~ ·.. while steam continued to be used at some ·'..,·.'. _. 1, · ,_ c · ·n... c····. ~:·y···,--·· Reception Sidings industrial sites in Lancashire but now only II AG hopper Agecroft Power Station, near Manchester, .if •i•>,c': fp , ' . ,. Ill ·• continues the tradition. Three power stations (A, B and C ) have been A completely ne w coal handling system using developed on the Agecroft site smce 1925 and steam locomotives, was built on a separate each has used a rrnl system in its coal site· to se rve···•· both 'B ' and 'C' stations. A senes of handling. lines, approximately I mile lung, was coalslockmg construc ted running from the original gmundwilh ,:···. ~ ~ -c·,.' .-:B.ft. .,. ....:;: y ·:·:· conveyor to Agecroft Junc tion. The line passed crone lrack (standard gmrgel -.. ~~:: .. ·~&--... 2 loco sheds and fanned into wagon sidings ,,,. .-n:v ...' ... which converged lo pass through the tippler. .. .. A new conveyor was built to take the coal over . .. ... the British Rail line and the canal to the power The original 'A' statio,n used a 2' 6" gauge station.
    [Show full text]
  • Copeland Unclassified Roads - Published January 2021
    Copeland Unclassified Roads - Published January 2021 • The list has been prepared using the available information from records compiled by the County Council and is correct to the best of our knowledge. It does not, however, constitute a definitive statement as to the status of any particular highway. • This is not a comprehensive list of the entire highway network in Cumbria although the majority of streets are included for information purposes. • The extent of the highway maintainable at public expense is not available on the list and can only be determined through the search process. • The List of Streets is a live record and is constantly being amended and updated. We update and republish it every 3 months. • Like many rural authorities, where some highways have no name at all, we usually record our information using a road numbering reference system. Street descriptors will be added to the list during the updating process along with any other missing information. • The list does not contain Recorded Public Rights of Way as shown on Cumbria County Council’s 1976 Definitive Map, nor does it contain streets that are privately maintained. • The list is property of Cumbria County Council and is only available to the public for viewing purposes and must not be copied or distributed.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Greater Manchester
    Exploring Greater Manchester a fieldwork guide Web edition edited by Paul Hindle Original printed edition (1998) edited by Ann Gardiner, Paul Hindle, John McKendrick and Chris Perkins Exploring Greater Manchester 5 5. Urban floodplains and slopes: the human impact on the environment in the built-up area Ian Douglas University of Manchester [email protected] A. The River Mersey STOP 1: Millgate Lane, Didsbury The urban development of Manchester has modified From East Didsbury station and the junction of the A34 runoff to rivers (see Figure 1), producing changes in and A5145, proceed south along Parrs Wood Road and into flood behaviour, which have required expensive remedial Millgate Lane, Stop at the bridge over the floodbasin inlet measures, particularly, the embankment of the Mersey from channel at Grid Reference (GR) 844896 (a car can be turned Stockport to Ashton weir near Urmston. In this embanked round at the playing fields car park further on). Looking reach, runoff from the urban areas includes natural channels, south from here the inlet channel from the banks of the storm drains and overflows from combined sewers. Mersey can be seen. At flood times the gates of the weir on Alternative temporary storages for floodwaters involve the Mersey embankment can be opened to release water into release of waters to floodplain areas as in the Didsbury flood the Didsbury flood basin that lies to the north. Here, and at basin and flood storage of water in Sale and Chorlton water other sites along the Mersey, evidence of multi-purpose use parks. This excursion examines the reach of the Mersey from of the floodplain, for recreation and wildlife conservation as Didsbury to Urmston.
    [Show full text]
  • Digest of United Kingdom Energy Statistics 2017
    DIGEST OF UNITED KINGDOM ENERGY STATISTICS 2017 July 2017 This document is available in large print, audio and braille on request. Please email [email protected] with the version you require. Digest of United Kingdom Energy Statistics Enquiries about statistics in this publication should be made to the contact named at the end of the relevant chapter. Brief extracts from this publication may be reproduced provided that the source is fully acknowledged. General enquiries about the publication, and proposals for reproduction of larger extracts, should be addressed to BEIS, at the address given in paragraph XXVIII of the Introduction. The Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) reserves the right to revise or discontinue the text or any table contained in this Digest without prior notice This is a National Statistics publication The United Kingdom Statistics Authority has designated these statistics as National Statistics, in accordance with the Statistics and Registration Service Act 2007 and signifying compliance with the UK Statistics Authority: Code of Practice for Official Statistics. Designation can be broadly interpreted to mean that the statistics: ñ meet identified user needs ONCEñ are well explained and STATISTICSreadily accessible HAVE ñ are produced according to sound methods, and BEENñ are managed impartially DESIGNATEDand objectively in the public interest AS Once statistics have been designated as National Statistics it is a statutory NATIONALrequirement that the Code of Practice S TATISTICSshall continue to be observed IT IS © A Crown copyright 2017 STATUTORY You may re-use this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence.
    [Show full text]
  • Application Num 4/19/2209/0F1 Applicant Mr T D Birkett, 8 Holme
    Application Num 4/19/2209/0F1 Applicant Mr T D Birkett, 8 Holme Court, APPLEBY-IN-WESTMORLAND, Cumbria CA16 6QT, Location LAND OFF PASTURE ROAD, ROWRAH, FRIZINGTON Proposal CHANGE OF USE OF LAND TO SITE A STATIC CARAVAN FOR USE IN ASSOCIATION WITH EXISTING EQUINE ACTIVITIES INCLUDING ASSOCIATED ACCESS PLATFORM AND DECKING Decision Approve Decision Date 10 January 2020 Parish Arlecdon and Frizington Application Num 4/19/2403/0F1 Applicant Mr A Fearon, Kirkland House Farm, Kirkland, FRIZINGTON, Cumbria CA26 3YB, Location FIELD TO WEST OF JUNCTION OF KIRKLAND ROAD AND A5086, LAMPLUGH Proposal RETENTION OF CONCRETE PAD AND GATEWAY TO IMPROVE VISIBILITY AT ACCESS Decision Approve (commence within 3 years) Decision Date 7 January 2020 Parish Lamplugh Application Num 4/19/2370/0O1 Applicant Mr Joseph Fussell, 17 Central Road, Kells, WHITEHAVEN, Cumbria CA28 9EQ, Location LAND TO THE NORTH OF ISLAND VIEW, 1 LOW KELLS, WHITEHAVEN Proposal OUTLINE APPLICATION (WITH ALL MATTERS RESERVED) FOR SINGLE DWELLING AND GARAGE Decision Approve in Outline (commence within 3 years) Decision Date 9 January 2020 Parish Whitehaven Application Num 4/19/2383/0F1 Applicant Elite Parking (Whitehaven) Ltd, Carleton House, 136 Gray Street, WORKINGTON, Cumbria CA14 2LU, FAO Mr Les Skinner, Location CART ROAD, THE GINNS, WHITEHAVEN Proposal DEMOLITION OF EXISTING DERELICT BUILDING AND CREATION OF PRIVATE CAR PARK Decision Approve Decision Date 8 January 2020 Parish Whitehaven Application Num 4/19/2394/0F1 Applicant Ms L Hunter, 52 Weavers Avenue, FRIZINGTON, Cumbria CA26
    [Show full text]
  • Reunification in South Wales
    Power Wind Marine Delivering marine expertise worldwide www.metoc.co.uk re News Part of the Petrofac group www.tnei.co.uk RENEWABLE ENERGY NEWS • ISSUE 226 27 OCTOBER 2011 TAG on for Teesside spoils TAG Energy Solutions is in negotiations for a contract to fabricate and deliver a “significant” proportion of Reunification monopiles for the Teesside offshore wind farm. PAGE 2 Middlemoor winning hand in south Wales Vestas is in pole position to land a plum supply RWE npower renewables with Nordex for 14 N90 middle when two contract at one of the largest remaining onshore has thrown in the towel 2.5MW units and has landowners decided in wind farms in England, RWE npower renewables’ at an 11-turbine wind roped Powersystems UK 2005 to proceed instead 18-turbine Middlemoor project in Northumberland. farm in south Wales and to oversee electrical with Pennant. offloaded the asset to works. Parent company Years of wrangling PAGE 3 local developer Pennant Walters Group will take ensued between Walters. care of civil engineering. environmental regulators Huhne hits the high notes The utility sold the The 35MW project is due and planners in Bridgend Energy secretary Chris Huhne took aim at “faultfinders consented four-turbine online by early 2013. and Rhondda Cynon Taf and curmudgeons who hold forth on the impossibility portion of its Fforch Nest The reunification of who were keen to see of renewables” in a strongly worded keynote address project in Bridgend and Fforch Nest and Pant-y- the projects rationalised to RenewableUK 2011 in Manchester this week. is in line to divest the Wal brings to an end a using a shared access remaining seven units if decade-long struggle and grid connection.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution Network Review
    A DISTRIBUTION NETWORK REVIEW ETSU K/EL/00188/REP Contractor P B Power Merz & McLellan Division PREPARED BY R J Fairbairn D Maunder P Kenyon The work described in this report was carried out under contract as part of the New and Renewable Energy Programme, managed by the Energy Technology Support Unit (ETSU) on behalf of the Department of Trade and Industry. The views and judgements expressed in this report are those of the contractor and do not necessarily reflect those of ETSU or the Department of Trade and Industry.__________ First published 1999 © Crown copyright 1999 Page iii 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.........................................................................................................................1.1 2. INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................................2.1 3. BACKGROUND.........................................................................................................................................3.1 3.1 Description of the existing electricity supply system in England , Scotland and Wales ...3.1 3.2 Summary of PES Licence conditions relating to the connection of embedded generation 3.5 3.3 Summary of conditions required to be met by an embedded generator .................................3.10 3.4 The effect of the Review of Electricity Trading Arrangements (RETA)..............................3.11 4. THE ABILITY OF THE UK DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS TO ACCEPT EMBEDDED GENERATION...................................................................................................................................................4.1
    [Show full text]
  • Cumbrian Railway Ancestors D Surnames Surname First Names
    Cumbrian Railway Ancestors D surnames Year Age Surname First names Employment Location Company Date Notes entered entered Source service service WW1 service, 4th Kings Own (Royal Dacre F. Supt of Line's Dept FR FUR 1914-18 0 FR Roll of Honour Lancaster) Regt., Private Dacre Frank Clerk Cark & Cartmel FUR 00/05/1911 AMB Dacre R. Yardman Cleator Moor Goods JTL 25/06/1892 Wage 24/- pw. Resigned JtL minute Nov 92 Dacre Richard Porter Cark & Cartmel FUR 27/12/1869 Entered servive on 18/- 20/- Mar 1872 1869 22 FR Staff Index 1845-1873 Fined 2/6 for being worse for drink and Dacre Richard Porter Cark & Cartmel FUR 00/01/1872 1869 22 FR Staff Index 1845-1873 leaving lamps burning Dacre Richard Porter Cark & Cartmel FUR 00/06/1872 Discharged for fighting Jun 1872 1869 22 FR Staff Index 1845-1873 Dacre Richard Temporary Porter Cark & Cartmel FUR 01/03/1875 Entered service. Discharged May 1875 1875 26 FR Staff Register Dacre Richard Signalman Roose FUR 30/11/1875 Entered service on 20/- 1875 26 FR Staff Register Dacre Richard Signalman Roose FUR 10/03/1876 Resigned 1875 26 FR Staff Register Dacre Robert Porter Whitehaven Preston St FUR 25/11/1867 Entered service on 18/- 1867 24 FR Staff Index 1845-1873 Dacre Robert Signalman Whitehaven Corkickle FUR 31/03/1868 Transferred from Preston St on 20/- 1867 24 FR Staff Index 1845-1873 Dacre Robert Pointsman Dalton FUR 00/11/1869 Transferred from Corkicle on 20/- 1867 25 FR Staff Index 1845-1873 Dacre Robert Pointsman Ulverston FUR 00/01/1870 From Dalton 1867 25 FR Staff Index 1845-1873 Transferred from Ulverston Resigned Dacre Robert Pointsman Carnforth FUR 00/01/1870 1867 25 FR Staff Index 1845-1873 Apr 1871 Dacre Robert Pointsman at Dock Basin Barrow Goods FUR 20/11/1871 Entered service on 20/- 1871 30 FR Staff Index 1845-1873 Moved from Barrow on 20/- 22/- Nov Dacre Robert Pointsman Furness Abbey FUR 00/03/1872 1871 30 FR Staff Index 1845-1873 1872 Resigned Feb 1873 Daffern G.W.
    [Show full text]
  • Industry Background
    Appendix 2.2: Industry background Contents Page Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1 Evolution of major market participants ....................................................................... 1 The Six Large Energy Firms ....................................................................................... 3 Gas producers other than Centrica .......................................................................... 35 Mid-tier independent generator company profiles .................................................... 35 The mid-tier energy suppliers ................................................................................... 40 Introduction 1. This appendix contains information about the following participants in the energy market in Great Britain (GB): (a) The Six Large Energy Firms – Centrica, EDF Energy, E.ON, RWE, Scottish Power (Iberdrola), and SSE. (b) The mid-tier electricity generators – Drax, ENGIE (formerly GDF Suez), Intergen and ESB International. (c) The mid-tier energy suppliers – Co-operative (Co-op) Energy, First Utility, Ovo Energy and Utility Warehouse. Evolution of major market participants 2. Below is a chart showing the development of retail supply businesses of the Six Large Energy Firms: A2.2-1 Figure 1: Development of the UK retail supply businesses of the Six Large Energy Firms Pre-liberalisation Liberalisation 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
    [Show full text]
  • Cumbria 3-2021.Xlsx
    Lens of Sutton Association ‐ Cumbria Railways ‐ Transport Library List 2021 Neg Description 66291 41221 Ivatt 2MT waiting at Coniston Station, Furness Railway, circa 1950 (AW Croughton) 66420 LMS 70 Stanier 3P 2‐6‐2T waiting at Low Gill Station, Little Noth‐Western side, 1948 (AW Croughton) 66522 Keswick Station, Cockermouth, Keswick & Penrith Railway, circa 1950 (AW Croughton) 66744 FR 105 Pettigrew 0‐6‐2T and FR 4 Pettigrew 0‐6‐0 outside Lakeside Station, Furness Railway, circa 1920 68610 Millom Station, Furness Railway, with Barrow bound DMU circa 1967 90459 42457 Stanier 4MT on eastbound passenger service entering Arnside Station, 13/8/1953 90522 42134 Faiburn 4MT in Windermere branch platform at Oxenholme Station, circa 1965 AY165 45572 Jubilee class on northbound passenger service at Penrith Station, circa late 1950s AY171 45506 Patriot class on northbound passenger service at Penrith Station, circa late 1950s CFO429 LMS 11627 ex Furness Railway 0‐6‐2T inside Moor Row engine shed, 10/7/1935 (CF Oldham) CFO447 LMS 12497 ex Furness Railway 0‐6‐0 outside Workington engine shed, 12/7/1935 (CF Oldham) CFO448 LMS 8603 ex LNWR 'Cauliflower' class 0‐6‐0 outside Workington engine shed, 12/7/1935 (CF Oldham) CFO449 LMS 4007 ex MR 4F class 0‐6‐0 outside Workington engine shed, 12/7/1935 (CF Oldham) CFO1276 LMS 8369 ex LNWR 'Cauliflower' class 0‐6‐0 on eastbound passenger service at Keswick Station, on the Cockermouth, Keswick and Penrith Railway, 7/6/1939 (CF Oldham) CFO1277 LMS 8610 ex LNWR 'Cauliflower' class 0‐6‐0 on eastbound passenger service near Threlkeld, on the Cockermouth, Keswick and Penrith Railway, 6/1939 (CF Oldham) CFO1278 LMS 8551 ex LNWR 'Cauliflower' class 0‐6‐0 on passenger service near Embleton, on the Cockermouth, Keswick and Penrith Railway, 6/1939 (CF Oldham) JNF261‐7 66478 ex NBR class J35 leaving Carlisle Station with 3‐25 pm service to Silloth, 15/7/1956 (JN Faulkner) JNF261‐8 42376 Fowler 4MT awaiting departure from Coniston Station with the 12‐00 to Barrow, 18/7/1956.
    [Show full text]
  • WIND ENERGY PROJECT FINANCING ONSHORE CASE STUDY with Zephir Lidar
    WIND ENERGY PROJECT FINANCING ONSHORE CASE STUDY with ZephIR Lidar “ZephIR delivers bankable, finance-grade wind data to Banks taking sites forward in a timely, cost effective and safe manner - correlations with a short mast are far better than often found when comparing two cup anemometers.” - REG Windpower world-leading lidar innovation finance-grade, ‘bankable’ wind data sets unparalleled data availability at all heights accurate, proven measurements in all terrains 650+ deployments and 3 million hours operation zephirlidar.com REG WINDPOWER LTD. Established in 1989 as Cornwall Light & Power, REG Windpower develops, builds and owns wind farms. The company now operate eleven wind farms (with a further two in construction) in England & Wales with an additional 900MW+ in development across the UK. In 2009, REG performed a strategic review of their approach to wind monitoring and the question was raised how to monitor wind more rapidly and more cost effectively against anemometry with traditional tall met masts. Zephir + short MAST MethodoLOGY REG implemented a strategy for 16 metre short met masts In 2009, REG purchased three ZephIRs to operate across the coupled with 6 month ZephIR lidar deployments for the rapid company’s entire portfolio of projects. The methodology is to and cost effective measurement of wind quality on potential install the short mast as the long term reference, collecting sites, for the following reasons: at least 12 months data covering seasonal variation. The ZephIR is installed for 6 months next to the mast - 6 months 1. Short masts are easier to get planning permission to is an adequate length of time to measure a significant range install on site - taller masts can take much longer.
    [Show full text]