No.89 June/July 1992 £1.50

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

No.89 June/July 1992 £1.50 No.89 June/July 1992 £1 .50 .. ... •·•·• .... ·.··. ··><·: '· anti-nuclear demonstration but an SCRAM's .. S~fe Etif!rgy jQLi~nalls COMMENT impromptu pop concert/' Greenpeace produced bf.:.monthly for the Brltl~h Anti-nuclear and Safe Energ)' had been granted a music licence for movements by .· the . ;.ScoUish s the 'mother of parliaments', the the day to allow U2 to play. BNFL's Cam!)aign to Resist the ,\tornic world's oldest democracy, turn­ real concern was that once the rock Menace. Views express~d in articles fans knew the full horror of THoRP' s appearing in .this )ournal .. ·are not I ing into the newest dictatorship? necessarily. those of SCRAM; A country where local authority office environmental and health implications bearers are disbarred from holding they would add their voice to the office in political parties, thus being growing protest scram, skram, v. ···· to shut-down a nuclear denied their democratic rights. A If the company are really concerned reactor in an emergency. country where under the constraints ...... ·. about" safety, public order and public of the new local authority finance legislation, Scottish authorities will health," they should cancel THORP. be unable to take part in a public CONTRIB!)ilONS Reprocessing is without purpose; it we welcome contributions of inquiry over the digging of a hole for increases the volume of radioactive articles, news, letters, graphl~s and nuclear waste at Sellafield. waste for final disposal by 160 times photographs; which should .bl,. sent and lays the foundations for the to SCRAM at the address below. There is a good chance that that plutonium economy. It must, as it LETTERS inquiry will establish generic already has been in the USA and many SCRAM·reser'tf~• ttie•• rlght.·to~dit approval for the deep dump design; other countries, be stopped. lett~rs to fit the.vailable••·•~•.AII approval which will then be exported letters for. publication sho!Jid •!3e submitted by the news deadline North, leaving a Scottish inquiry to EARTH SUMMIT below. argue about the colour of the outbuildings. A country in which the VEN the longest journey starts COPY DEADLINES movements of nuclear materials are with a single step. However, The Copy Deadline for feature with the future of the planet at articles for the next issue kept secret from the very people who E (AugustjSeptember '92) is 21 July. would be expected to pick up the stake, it is alarming that the 150 (Feature articles· a.re approximately pieces in the event of an accident. world leaders who gathered in Rio 900 words per page.) News copy for the Earth Summit have taken us should normally be submitted within Now the Courts, those defenders of such a short a distance along the a week of the features deadline. freedom and liberty, have been used road to sustainable development. ADVERTISING to stifle protest over the opening of the Advertising rates are shown on Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant - George Bush was the hate figure in Rio page 26. Inserts can be mailed out Sellafield 2. A plant which will - and rightly so! with the journal -details on request. increase Sellafield' s radioactive The Earth Summit demanded BACK ISSUES discharges to land and sea by 1000% Back coplu of the journ~l are statesmanship from the leader of the and 800% respectively, escalating available for .most issues. Copies from most powerful nation; instead it got the previous year cost £1.20 (Inc. p&p) environmental and health damage. 'the campaign to re-elect the or £6 for the set of six. Issues more than "We won't allow Sellafield to become President'. As one US a year old are 75p (inc. p&p). a danger to the public," screamed the environmentalist explained, the SUBSCRIPTIONS massive ads taken out in Britain's trouble with Bush is that he's a Marxist For details of subscription rates see national newspapers. Yet they were - his philosophy is "stuff posterity - the form on the back page. not taken out by opponents of the what's it ever done for us?" (Groucho FOR .THE BLIND plant, but by its operators, British Marx] The. text of Safe Energy is. now Nuclear Fuels (BNFL). available on disk for people who are His argument in Rio about protecting registered blind. This service .Is Having previously agreed to a US jobs is the self-centred view of a available at a charge of £3 above the appropriate subscription rate ~ this demonstration against their new Texan oil millionaire - a move away covers the cost of the disks and plant, BNFL took fright when the from fossil fuels will offer new job administration. Further information event threatened to draw over 10,000 opportunities, and much more. -available on request. people to the site. They only agreed Rather than hoping that the 1,000 PRODUCTION originally to the demo on "the basis scientists of the Intergovernmental Editors: that a few hundred would attend." Mike Townsley Panel on Climate Change are wrong, Graham Stein A High Court judge, Mr Justice May, urgent action must be taken now to granted injunctions against reduce carbon dioxide emissions. The Front Cover Illustration: Davld Shaw. Greenpeace, Cumbrians Against a precautionary principle is the only Radioactive Environment (CORE) sane approach. and the Irish 'super group' U2, Energy efficiency and renewable banning them from setting foot on any energy systems are a clean and viable Published by SCRAM, 11 Forth of BNFL' s 3,225 acres, which contains alternative to fossil fuels and nuclear Street, Edinburgh EH1 3LE. the 646-acre reprocessing plant, on the power. They are also appropriate to weekend of June 20. 1t 031-§57' 4283/4 both North and South, offering the Fax i031-557 4284 (no junk taxes) "This is not a free speech issue, it is a chance for convergent paths to public safety issue," claimed BNFL: sustainable development and the ISSN 0140 7340 Bi-monttlly. "What was planned was not an saving of this Earth. 2 Safe Energy 89 SAFE ENERGY CONTENTS FEATURES I 8 THORP: the krypton factor With the start-up of the UiORP reprocessing plant, the release of radioactive krypton gas into the atmosphere will increase by a factor of ten. As Pete Roche of Greenpeace explains, these emissions and their unpredictable conse­ quences could be avoided using existing technology. 1 O UK radhealth proposals criticised Proposals from the Health and Safety Commission to implement a European Community Directive on public information for radiation emergencies have come in for widespread criticism. Fred Barker, a freelance writer and consultant on nuclear issues, reports on the controversy. 12 The wind in Wales Proponents of wind power in Wales are striving to overcome opposition from a variety of unlikely bedfellows. Robert Minhinnick of Friends of the Earth Cymru describes the current state of play. Storing up trouble 14 Scottish Nuclear are planning to build a dry-store at the Torness power station for spent fuel rather than send it to Sellafield for reprocessing. Mike Townsley details their proposals and expresses concern that this temporary store may become a final resting place. Greening our buildings 16 Britain lags far behind its European neighbours in the field of energy-efficient buildings. With reference to his recent Energy efficiency and renewables: recent experiences on mainland europe, David Olivier presents some relevant facts and figures. Rtissing roulette 18 The supply side of the nuclear industry involves its own share of hazards. Tim Archer looks at the environmental effects, and the risks faced by workers in uranium mines. 20 When is a dose not a dose? When it comes from a previously contaminated environment, says the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. Friends of the Earth's radiation campaigner, Dr Patrick Green, describes the wrangling over the latest international recommendations on safe radiation levels. June/July '92 3 Nirex's deep trouble also involve some 200 lorries travelling to • Meanwhile, in a letter to Friends of the site daily during construction. Ancient the Earth (FoE) Nirex said they now loaning and standing stones would be de­ plan to perforate the nuclear waste con­ T'S the beginning of the end for stroyed to make way for access roads. An tainers due to be placed in their reposi­ I Nirex's plan for a deep dump at Sel­ appeal against the Planning Board's deci­ tory. lafield. The company have announced sion will be lodged and is likely to result in According to FoE, Nirex have ad­ that they no longer intend to file for a public inquiry. mitted that this change is the result of planning permission this year, instead Since the planning inquiry into the research which highlighted the danger they don't expect to lodge a planning Sellafield deep dump is expected to last posed by gas generation within the steel application before August 1993. a year, this means that no 'solution • to containers. A 150mm hole in the 500 In letters to local authorities, Nirex's the problem of nuclear waste will be litre containers would vent the gas, thus Managing Director, Michael Folger, available for the Government's 1994 preventing pressure building up and says that a review of geological studies nuclear review. Without a 'solution' to causing the containers to explode, claim carried out so far confirms that Sella­ the waste problem it is difficult to see Nirex. field potentially offers a safe site for the how the Government could justify lift­ Previously Nirex has argued that the repository. This is despite revelations ing its moratorium on building new nu­ waste containers should remain water­ earlier this year, made in their own two­ clear power stations.
Recommended publications
  • Agecroft in Steam
    ( ?I ~- - - ~"~ _., -- ........... / -- . , ·--....., __ t) \ ,-- The 1960's saw a dramatic change m the use of The 'A' station system was abandoned early m steam locomotion in the North West of 1947 as construction of 'B' station cooling to Cl!Jton Junc1:c'n ) England. Within the short space of 8 years the towers severed the line. Between then and its QI✓ . familiar sight of a steam-hauled train closure the 'A' station received coal by road. {not all 1he rm,ways shown exi~ad al the some time vanished completely from British Rail. For a A Stallon .,:· :·, ,: ' _::' .·. ·-~ ·.. while steam continued to be used at some ·'..,·.'. _. 1, · ,_ c · ·n... c····. ~:·y···,--·· Reception Sidings industrial sites in Lancashire but now only II AG hopper Agecroft Power Station, near Manchester, .if •i•>,c': fp , ' . ,. Ill ·• continues the tradition. Three power stations (A, B and C ) have been A completely ne w coal handling system using developed on the Agecroft site smce 1925 and steam locomotives, was built on a separate each has used a rrnl system in its coal site· to se rve···•· both 'B ' and 'C' stations. A senes of handling. lines, approximately I mile lung, was coalslockmg construc ted running from the original gmundwilh ,:···. ~ ~ -c·,.' .-:B.ft. .,. ....:;: y ·:·:· conveyor to Agecroft Junc tion. The line passed crone lrack (standard gmrgel -.. ~~:: .. ·~&--... 2 loco sheds and fanned into wagon sidings ,,,. .-n:v ...' ... which converged lo pass through the tippler. .. .. A new conveyor was built to take the coal over . .. ... the British Rail line and the canal to the power The original 'A' statio,n used a 2' 6" gauge station.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Greater Manchester
    Exploring Greater Manchester a fieldwork guide Web edition edited by Paul Hindle Original printed edition (1998) edited by Ann Gardiner, Paul Hindle, John McKendrick and Chris Perkins Exploring Greater Manchester 5 5. Urban floodplains and slopes: the human impact on the environment in the built-up area Ian Douglas University of Manchester [email protected] A. The River Mersey STOP 1: Millgate Lane, Didsbury The urban development of Manchester has modified From East Didsbury station and the junction of the A34 runoff to rivers (see Figure 1), producing changes in and A5145, proceed south along Parrs Wood Road and into flood behaviour, which have required expensive remedial Millgate Lane, Stop at the bridge over the floodbasin inlet measures, particularly, the embankment of the Mersey from channel at Grid Reference (GR) 844896 (a car can be turned Stockport to Ashton weir near Urmston. In this embanked round at the playing fields car park further on). Looking reach, runoff from the urban areas includes natural channels, south from here the inlet channel from the banks of the storm drains and overflows from combined sewers. Mersey can be seen. At flood times the gates of the weir on Alternative temporary storages for floodwaters involve the Mersey embankment can be opened to release water into release of waters to floodplain areas as in the Didsbury flood the Didsbury flood basin that lies to the north. Here, and at basin and flood storage of water in Sale and Chorlton water other sites along the Mersey, evidence of multi-purpose use parks. This excursion examines the reach of the Mersey from of the floodplain, for recreation and wildlife conservation as Didsbury to Urmston.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution Network Review
    A DISTRIBUTION NETWORK REVIEW ETSU K/EL/00188/REP Contractor P B Power Merz & McLellan Division PREPARED BY R J Fairbairn D Maunder P Kenyon The work described in this report was carried out under contract as part of the New and Renewable Energy Programme, managed by the Energy Technology Support Unit (ETSU) on behalf of the Department of Trade and Industry. The views and judgements expressed in this report are those of the contractor and do not necessarily reflect those of ETSU or the Department of Trade and Industry.__________ First published 1999 © Crown copyright 1999 Page iii 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.........................................................................................................................1.1 2. INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................................2.1 3. BACKGROUND.........................................................................................................................................3.1 3.1 Description of the existing electricity supply system in England , Scotland and Wales ...3.1 3.2 Summary of PES Licence conditions relating to the connection of embedded generation 3.5 3.3 Summary of conditions required to be met by an embedded generator .................................3.10 3.4 The effect of the Review of Electricity Trading Arrangements (RETA)..............................3.11 4. THE ABILITY OF THE UK DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS TO ACCEPT EMBEDDED GENERATION...................................................................................................................................................4.1
    [Show full text]
  • Industry Background
    Appendix 2.2: Industry background Contents Page Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1 Evolution of major market participants ....................................................................... 1 The Six Large Energy Firms ....................................................................................... 3 Gas producers other than Centrica .......................................................................... 35 Mid-tier independent generator company profiles .................................................... 35 The mid-tier energy suppliers ................................................................................... 40 Introduction 1. This appendix contains information about the following participants in the energy market in Great Britain (GB): (a) The Six Large Energy Firms – Centrica, EDF Energy, E.ON, RWE, Scottish Power (Iberdrola), and SSE. (b) The mid-tier electricity generators – Drax, ENGIE (formerly GDF Suez), Intergen and ESB International. (c) The mid-tier energy suppliers – Co-operative (Co-op) Energy, First Utility, Ovo Energy and Utility Warehouse. Evolution of major market participants 2. Below is a chart showing the development of retail supply businesses of the Six Large Energy Firms: A2.2-1 Figure 1: Development of the UK retail supply businesses of the Six Large Energy Firms Pre-liberalisation Liberalisation 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
    [Show full text]
  • Distributed Power Generation Using Biogas Fuelled Microturbines
    DISTRIBUTED POWER GENERATION USING BIOGAS FUELLED MICROTURBINES ETSU Contract B/U1/00670/00/REP DTI/PubURN 02/1345 Contractor Advantica Prepared by Kevin Pointon and Mike Langan The work described in this report was carried out under contract as part of the New and Renewable Energy Programme, managed by ETSU on behalf of the Department of Trade and Industry. The views and judgments expressed in this report are those of the contractor and do not necessarily reflect those of ETSU or the Department of Trade and Industry. First Published 2002 © Advantica Technologies Ltd Executive Summary Background Biogas, from anaerobic digestion (AD) contains a mixture of methane and carbon dioxide, with a calorific value (CV) between 50% and 60% of that of natural gas. According to the UK Government’s renewable energy strategy, there is considerable potential for electricity generation from biomass, and the European Union Renewable Energy Campaign for Take-off sets a target of 1GW of biogas fuelled installations throughout Europe by 2003. The use of AD to generate biogas is a mature technology, however, despite government initiatives to promote its widespread use, biogas generation is limited to the wastewater treatment industry and to a few small farm based projects. One of the limitations is the availability and reliability of small-scale power generation technologies. The development of the biogas compatible microturbine could improve the reliability and performance of the power generation side of the plant. The establishment of a link between a well-characterised biogas demonstration with a microturbine with proven operation on natural gas is a significant extension to existing technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex D Major Events in the Energy Industry
    Annex D Major events in the Energy Industry 2018 Energy Prices In February 2018 the Domestic Gas and Electricity (Tariff Cap) Bill was introduced to Parliament, which will put in place a requirement on the independent regulator, Ofgem, to cap energy tariffs until 2020. It will mean an absolute cap can be set on poor value tariffs, protecting the 11 million households in England, Wales and Scotland who are currently on a standard variable or other default energy tariff and who are not protected by existing price caps. An extension to Ofgem’s safeguard tariff cap was introduced in February 2018 which will see a further one million more vulnerable consumers protected from unfair energy price rises. Nuclear In June 2018 the Government announced a deal with the nuclear sector to ensure that nuclear energy continues to power the UK for years to come through major innovation, cutting-edge technology and ensuring a diverse and highly-skilled workforce. Key elements include: • a £200 million Nuclear Sector Deal to secure the UK’s diverse energy mix and drive down the costs of nuclear energy meaning cheaper energy bills for customers; • a £32 million boost from government and industry to kick-start a new advanced manufacturing programme including R&D investment to develop potential world-leading nuclear technologies like advanced modular reactors; • a commitment to increasing gender diversity with a target of 40% women working in the civil nuclear sector by 2030. 2017 Energy Policy In October 2017 the Government published The Clean Growth Strategy: Leading the way to a low carbon future, which aims to cut emissions while keeping costs down for consumers, creating good jobs and growing the economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex D Major Events in the Energy Industry
    Annex D Major events in the Energy Industry 2020 Electricity In July 2020 construction work commenced on what is set to be the world’s longest electricity interconnector, linking the UK’s power system with Denmark. Due for completion in 2023, the 765-kilometre ‘Viking Link’ cable will stretch from Lincolnshire to South Jutland in Denmark. In July 2020 approval was granted for the Vanguard offshore wind farm in Norfolk. The 1.8GW facility consisting of up to 180 turbines will generate enough electricity to power 1.95 million homes. In May 2020 approval was granted for Britain’s largest ever solar farm at Cleve Hill, near Whitstable in Kent. The 350MW facility, comprising of 800.000 solar panels, will begin operation in 2022 and will provide power to around 91,000 homes. Energy Prices In February 2020 the energy price cap was reduced by £17 to £1,162 per year, from 1 April for the six-month “summer” price cap period. 2019 Climate Change The Government laid draft legislation in Parliament in early June 2019 to end the UK’s contribution to climate change, by changing the UK’s legally binding long-term emissions reduction target to net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. The new target is based on advice from the government’s independent advisors, the Committee on Climate Change (CCC). The legislation was signed into law in late June 2019, following approval by the House of Commons and the House of Lords. Energy Policy A joint government-industry Offshore Wind Sector Deal was announced in March 2019, which will lead to clean, green offshore wind providing more than 30% of British electricity by 2030.
    [Show full text]
  • UK Electricity Networks the Nature of UK Electricity Transmission and Distribution Networks in an Intermittent Renewable and Embedded Electricity Generation Future
    UK Electricity Networks The nature of UK electricity transmission and distribution networks in an intermittent renewable and embedded electricity generation future By Scott Butler Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine Centre for Environmental Technology in collaboration with Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology (POST) September 2001 IMPERIAL COLLEGE OF SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND MEDICINE (University of London) Centre for Environmental Technology TH Huxley School of Environment, Earth Sciences & Engineering UK Electricity Networks The nature of UK electricity transmission and distribution networks in an intermittent renewable and embedded electricity generation future. By Scott Butler A report submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the MSc and/or the DIC September 2001 DECLARATION OF OWN WORK I declare that this thesis… UK Electricity Networks: the nature of UK electricity transmission and distribution networks in an intermittent renewable and embedded electricity generation future. Is entirely my own work and that where any material could be construed as the work of others, it is fully cited and referenced, and/or with appropriate acknowledgement given Signature: __________________________________________ Date: _______________________________________________ Name of Student: _____________________________________ Name of Supervisor: ___________________________________ Page ii Abstract UK Electricity Networks The nature of UK electricity transmission and distribution networks in an intermittent renewable and embedded electricity generation future Electricity systems have developed during the last century on the basis of large central generating units. These feed into an interconnected high voltage transmission and lower voltage distribution network. Recent developments challenge this structure. Electricity market liberalisation introduced in 1989 has had a profound impact on the nature of the UK Electricity Supply Industry (ESI).
    [Show full text]
  • Uk Regional Development Programme 1986-90
    EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND UK REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME 1986-90 Section 7E: England — South Yorkshire Section 7F: England — Workington Section 7G: England — Greater Manchester Section 7H: England — Greater Merseyside lUlaUmiãl· I U If ΦΟ DOCUMENT DOCUMENTI CUMENT DOCUMENTO DOK1 ¡NT ΕΓΓΡΑΦΟ DOCUMENT DI JMENTO DOCUMENT UUCUM TU ηυκυΜΕΝΤΕΓΓΡΑΦΟηΐ (MENT DOCUMENTO OUCUMI MHB ΡΑΦΟΟΟΟΟΜΕΜ I tvivl COMMISSION POOGIIIÌEN^DOG OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES ΝΤΕΓΓΡΑΦ( uranFrinii nni-iiupuiiiAnAni This document has been prepared for use within the Commission. It does not necessarily represent the Commission's official position. Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1987 Vol.3 : ISBN 92-825-7194-7 Vol. 1-7: ISBN 92-825-7199-8 Catalogue number: CB-98-87-00J-EN-C © ECSC-EEC-EAEC, Brussels · Luxembourg, 1987 Reproduction is authorized, except for commercial purposes, provided the source is acknowledged. Printed in Belgium Commission of the European Communities European Regional Development Fund UK RE6I0NAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME 1986-90 Section 7E: EngLand - South Yorkshire Section 7F: EngLand - Workington Section 7G: EngLand - Greater Manchester Section 7H: EngLand - Greater Merseyside Document This document has been prepared for use within the Commission. It does not necessarily represent the Commission's official position. Copyright ECSC-EEC-EAEC, Brussels - Luxembourg, 1987 Reproduction is authorized, except for commercial purposes, provided the source is acknowledged. / L European Regional Development Fund UK REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME 1986-90 Section 7E: England - South Yorkshire d UCJ [ \j \ 1' UK REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME 1986-90 CONTENTS The Programme consists of detailed information on regional or sub-regional areas (Sections 7 to 10) preceded by general information on the United Kingdom (Sections 1 to 6).
    [Show full text]
  • Community Consultation
    Core Strategy and Development Management Policies Statement of Consultation - Submission October 2012 2 Contents The consultation and involvement process Page 5 Annex 1: Consolidated list of representors 8 Annex 2: Regulation 20 (pre-submission publication) 11 Representations made under Regulation 20 25 (publication consultation, May/July 2012) Annex 4: Regulation 18 (‘Preferred Options’) stage 139 Annex 5: Regulation 18 (‘Issues and Options’) stage 214 Annex 6: Statement of Community Involvement (summary) 235 3 4 The consultation and involvement process The Statement of Community Involvement This was adopted in January 2008, and revised in September of that year to incorporate procedural changes brought in by the 2008 Planning Act. Although the 2008 Act did away with the ‘Issues and Options’ and ‘Preferred Options’ terminology, the former stage had already been set in motion, and it has been considered logical to present the subsequent (2010) consultation as a ‘preferred option’. The SCI sets out a range of consultation and involvement possibilities. In jkeeping with a strategic document, consultation, especially in the later stages, has focused on the methods which the SCI sets out as standard (advertisement of published documents, use of the Council’s web site, and local mass media), along with targeted locality-based meetings – either to invited stakeholder audiences or public ‘drop in’ sessions. The SCI is available on the ldf section of the Council’s web site www.copeland.gov.uk/ldf, and its Executive Summary is at Annex 7 (page ). Early engagement ‘Stakeholder Launch’ events were held in November 2008, one for stakeholders in the Borough and another for external invitees.
    [Show full text]
  • Uk Electricity Networks
    October 2001 Number 163 UK ELECTRICITY NETWORKS The Government wishes to increase the contribution of An interconnected electricity system renewable electricity and Combined Heat and Power SCALE GENERATION (CHP)1 to UK energy supplies. Much of this technology large-scale high voltage generation Power Station will be small-scale and situated close to where its transmission output is used. The electricity output may be less predictable than from sources such as gas, coal-fired or LOWER 23kVVOLTAGE Generator/transformer 400kV nuclear power stations. The configuration, operation DISTRIBUTION lower voltage distribution and regulation of current national electricity networks grid may therefore need modification. This briefing explores supply point the regulatory, economic and technical implications arising. It accompanies a related but separate briefing on renewable energy (POSTnote 164). 132kV Transformer 275kV Large Factories, Medium Factories, To small factories commercial Heavy Industry Light Industry The current situation and residential areas The first electricity networks developed around 120 years ago as localised street systems and have evolved to 33kV 11kV 230V become today’s interconnected national transmission and distribution network. Transmission is the bulk, often long distance, movement of electricity at high voltages The National Grid Company plc The high voltage (400kV and 275kV) transmission system, (400kV [400,000 volts] - and 275kV) from generating through which bulk electricity is moved, is owned and stations to distribution companies and to a small number operated by the National Grid Company plc (NGC). NGC’s of large industrial customers. Distribution is electricity holding company (The National Grid Group plc) was floated provision to the majority of customers through lower on the stock market in 1995.
    [Show full text]
  • Asset Accumulation and Its Effects on NIE's Transmission And
    ASSET ACCUMULATION AND ITS EFFECT ON NIE’s TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION PRICE CONTROL A consultation paper by the Director General of Electricity Supply for Northern Ireland November 2000 INTRODUCTION This paper is the second in a series of consultation papers published as a contribution to informing the process leading to the introduction of a new price control for NIE’s Transmission and Distribution Business from 1 April 2002. The purpose of this paper is threefold: (i) to set out the evidence that investment in T&D in Northern Ireland is occurring at a much faster rate than in GB; (i) to outline the effect of this on price differences with GB regions over the next 40 years under the prevailing industry arrangements for financing capital expenditure; and (ii) to establish if the higher levels of expenditure that customers in Northern Ireland are having to pay for is enabling Northern Ireland to “catch up” with Great Britain in terms of the quality of its electricity supply. These three objectives are tackled below in Parts (2), (3) and (4) after a brief summary of the background to these issues. For the transparency of the process, it is desirable to have the proposed control discussed in as public a way as possible and the facts - on which judgements will in due course be made - clearly stated and open to challenge and scrutiny. Indeed the implications of the figures reported in this paper are so alarming that it is essential that they are subject to the most robust challenge. Ofreg would therefore welcome views on the three areas highlighted above and in particular on the methodology employed in arriving at the figures quoted.
    [Show full text]