Nomination List LC4 Eng (20160818)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Nomination List LC4 Eng (20160818) 2016 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL GENERAL ELECTION NOMINATIONS FOR GEOGRAPHICAL CONSTITUENCIES (NOMINATION PERIOD: 16-29 JULY 2016) As at 5 pm, 29 July 2016 (Friday) Geographical Constituency List (Surname First) Alias Sex Occupation Political Affiliation Date of Nomination Remarks New Territories West CHAN Han-pan M DAB 16/7/2016 KWOK Fu-yung F DAB 16/7/2016 LI Sai-lung M DAB 16/7/2016 LEUNG Kar-ming F DAB 16/7/2016 CHAN Chun-chung M DAB 16/7/2016 LUI Dik-ming F DAB 16/7/2016 PAU Ming-hong M DAB 16/7/2016 New Territories West HO Kwan-yiu M Solicitor Independent 16/7/2016 New Territories West WONG Chun-kit M Chief Community Officer in New Territories West Youngspiration 18/7/2016 WONG Pak-yu M Community Executive TSW New Force 18/7/2016 LEUNG Chung-hang Sixtus M *E Commerce Manager Youngspiration 18/7/2016 Withdrawn on 29/7/2016 New Territories West CHAN Ho-tin M Political Party Convenor Hong Kong National Party 18/7/2016 New Territories West FUNG Kin-kee Frederick M Legislative Councilor Hong Kong Association for Democracy and People’s Livelihood 19/7/2016 New Territories West CHOW Wing-kan M District Councilor Liberal Party 19/7/2016 New Territories West TIEN Michael Puk-sun M Councillor, Entrepreneur New People's Party 19/7/2016 WONG Wai-shun Wilson M Solicitor New People's Party 19/7/2016 SO Ka-man F Lawyer New People's Party 19/7/2016 TSUI Hiu-kit M District Councillor New People's Party 19/7/2016 KAM Man-fung M District Councillor New People's Party 19/7/2016 CHENG Chit-pun M District Councillor New People's Party 19/7/2016 FU Hiu-lam Sammi F District Councillor New People's Party 19/7/2016 New Territories West LEUNG Che-cheung M Full Time Councilor Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong 20/7/2016 New Territories Association of Societies LUI Kin M Researcher Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong 20/7/2016 New Territories Association of Societies WONG Hon-kuen Ken M District Councilor 20/7/2016 YIP Man-pan M Full Time District Councilor Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong 20/7/2016 New Territories Association of Societies CHUI Kwan-siu M Community Officer Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong 20/7/2016 New Territories Association of Societies LAI Ka-man F Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong 20/7/2016 New Territories Association of Societies New Territories West WONG Yun-tat M Neighbourhood and Worker’s Service Centre 20/7/2016 LEUNG Ching-shan F Neighbourhood and Worker’s Service Centre 20/7/2016 CHOW Wai-hung Rayman M District Council Member Neighbourhood and Worker’s Service Centre 20/7/2016 2016 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL GENERAL ELECTION NOMINATIONS FOR GEOGRAPHICAL CONSTITUENCIES (NOMINATION PERIOD: 16-29 JULY 2016) As at 5 pm, 29 July 2016 (Friday) Geographical Constituency List (Surname First) Alias Sex Occupation Political Affiliation Date of Nomination Remarks New Territories West CHU Hoi-dick Eddie M Community Organizer 20/7/2016 New Territories West KWOK Ka-ki M Surgeon Civic Party 21/7/2016 SIN Ho-fai M Community Officer Civic Party 21/7/2016 New Territories West MAK Mei-kuen Alice F Legislative Councillor The Hong Kong Federation of Trade Unions 22/7/2016 YIU Kwok-wai M District Council Member The Hong Kong Federation of Trade Unions 22/7/2016 KOT Siu-yuen M District Council Member The Hong Kong Federation of Trade Unions 22/7/2016 FUNG Pui-yin M The Hong Kong Federation of Trade Unions 22/7/2016 LAU Chin-pang M The Hong Kong Federation of Trade Unions 22/7/2016 New Territories West WAN Siu-kin Andrew M Chief Executive (of voluntary org.) The Democratic Party 22/7/2016 HO Chun-yan M Solicitor/Legislative Councillor The Democratic Party 22/7/2016 LEE Wing-tat M Part-time University Lecturer The Democratic Party 22/7/2016 WONG Lai-sheung Catherine F District Councillor The Democratic Party 22/7/2016 LAM Siu-fai M District Councillor The Democratic Party 22/7/2016 New Territories West WONG Ho-ming M Social Policy Officer League of Social Democrats 23/7/2016 CHAN Wai-yip Albert M Legislative Councillor People Power 23/7/2016 New Territories West LEE Cheuk-yan M General Secretary Labour Party 25/7/2016 CHIU Yan-loy M Legislative Assistant Labour Party 25/7/2016 New Territories West TONG Wing-chi F NGO Secretary-general 25/7/2016 New Territories West CHEUNG Wai-ching Clarice F District Councillor 27/7/2016 New Territories West KO Chi-fai M Insurance Politihk Social Strategic 27/7/2016 TANG Tak-shing Innes M Merchant 27/7/2016 New Territories West CHENG Chung-tai M Teaching Fellow Civic Passion 28/7/2016 CHEUNG Yiu-sum F Presenter Civic Passion 28/7/2016 New Territories West NAKADE Hitsujiko US Army M Civil Diplomacy Planner Nationalist Hong Kong 28/7/2016 Guidefig New Territories West LUI Chi-hang Hendrick M Social Worker Christians to the World 29/7/2016 New Territories West KWONG Koon-wan M District Councilor 29/7/2016 * The information has been revised/deleted as requested by the candidate. Note: Please also refer to the Chinese version, which may contain additional information (e.g. occupation) provided by some nominees in Chinese only. [Source of information: Nomination forms submitted by nominees].
Recommended publications
  • Reviewing and Evaluating the Direct Elections to the Legislative Council and the Transformation of Political Parties in Hong Kong, 1991-2016
    Journal of US-China Public Administration, August 2016, Vol. 13, No. 8, 499-517 doi: 10.17265/1548-6591/2016.08.001 D DAVID PUBLISHING Reviewing and Evaluating the Direct Elections to the Legislative Council and the Transformation of Political Parties in Hong Kong, 1991-2016 Chung Fun Steven Hung The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong After direct elections were instituted in Hong Kong, politicization inevitably followed democratization. This paper intends to evaluate how political parties’ politics happened in Hong Kong’s recent history. The research was conducted through historical comparative analysis, with the context of Hong Kong during the sovereignty transition and the interim period of democratization being crucial. For the implementation of “one country, two systems”, political democratization was hindered and distinct political scenarios of Hong Kong’s transformation were made. The democratic forces had no alternative but to seek more radicalized politics, which caused a decisive fragmentation of the local political parties where the establishment camp was inevitable and the democratic blocs were split into many more small groups individually. It is harmful. It is not conducive to unity and for the common interests of the publics. This paper explores and evaluates the political history of Hong Kong and the ways in which the limited democratization hinders the progress of Hong Kong’s transformation. Keywords: election politics, historical comparative, ruling, democratization The democratizing element of the Hong Kong political system was bounded within the Legislative Council under the principle of the separation of powers of the three governing branches, Executive, Legislative, and Judicial. Popular elections for the Hong Kong legislature were introduced and implemented for 25 years (1991-2016) and there were eight terms of general elections for the Legislative Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Hong Kong Official Title: Hong Kong Special Administration Region General Information
    Hong Kong Official Title: Hong Kong Special Administration Region General Information: Capital Population (million) 7.474n/a Total Area 1,104 km² Currency 1 CAN$=5.791 Hong Kong $ (HKD) (2020 - Annual average) National Holiday Establishment Day, 1 July 1997 Language(s) Cantonese, English, increasing use of Mandarin Political Information: Type of State Type of Government Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China (PRC). Bilateral Product trade Canada - Hong Kong 5000 4500 4000 Balance 3500 3000 Can. Head of State Head of Government Exports 2500 President Chief Executive 2000 Can. Imports XI Jinping Carrie Lam Millions 1500 Total 1000 Trade 500 Ministers: Chief Secretary for Admin.: Matthew Cheung 0 Secretary for Finance: Paul CHAN 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Statistics Canada Secretary for Justice: Teresa CHENG Main Political Parties Canadian Imports Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong (DAB), Democratic Party from: Hong Kong (DP), Liberal Party (LP), Civic Party, League of Social Democrats (LSD), Hong Kong Association for Democracy and People’s Livelihood (HKADPL), Hong Kong Federation of Precio us M etals/ stones Trade Unions (HKFTU), Business and Professionals Alliance for Hong Kong (BPA), Labour M ach. M ech. Elec. Party, People Power, New People’s Party, The Professional Commons, Neighbourhood and Prod. Worker’s Service Centre, Neo Democrats, New Century Forum (NCF), The Federation of Textiles Prod. Hong Kong and Kowloon Labour Unions, Civic Passion, Hong Kong Professional Teachers' Union, HK First, New Territories Heung Yee Kuk, Federation of Public Housing Estates, Specialized Inst. Concern Group for Tseung Kwan O People's Livelihood, Democratic Alliance, Kowloon East Food Prod.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissenting Media in Post-1997 Hong Kong Joyce Y.M. Nip the De
    Dissenting media in post-1997 Hong Kong Joyce Y.M. Nip The de-colonization of Hong Kong took the form of Britain returning the territory to China in 1997 as a Special Administrative Region (SAR). Twenty years after the political handover, the “one country, two systems” arrangement designed by China to govern the Hong Kong SAR is facing serious challenge: Many in Hong Kong have come to regard Beijing as an unwelcome control master; and calls for self-determination have gained a substantial level of popular support. This chapter examines the role of media in this development, as exemplified by key political protest actions. It proposes the notion of “dissenting media” as a framework to integrate relevant academic and journalistic studies about Hong Kong. From the discipline of media and communications study, it suggests that operators of dissenting media are enabled to put forth information and analysis contrary to that of the establishment, which, in turn, help to form an oppositional public sphere. In the process, the identity and communities of dissent are built, maintained, and developed, contributing to the formation of a counter public that participates in oppositional political actions. Studies on the impact of media, mainly conducted in stable Anglo-American societies, tend to consider mainstream media as institutions that index1 or reinforce the status quo,2 and alternative media as forces that challenge established powers.3 In Hong Kong, the 1997 political changeover was accompanied by a reconfiguration of power relationships in line with China’s one-party dictatorship. The change runs counter to the political aspirations of the people of Hong Kong, and has bred a political movement for civil liberties, public accountability, and democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • Rival Securitising Attempts in the Democratisation of Hong Kong Written by Neville Chi Hang Li
    Rival Securitising Attempts in the Democratisation of Hong Kong Written by Neville Chi Hang Li This PDF is auto-generated for reference only. As such, it may contain some conversion errors and/or missing information. For all formal use please refer to the official version on the website, as linked below. Rival Securitising Attempts in the Democratisation of Hong Kong https://www.e-ir.info/2019/03/29/rival-securitising-attempts-in-the-democratisation-of-hong-kong/ NEVILLE CHI HANG LI, MAR 29 2019 This is an excerpt from New Perspectives on China’s Relations with the World: National, Transnational and International. Get your free copy here. The principle of “one country, two systems” is in grave political danger. According to the Joint Declaration on the Question of Hong Kong signed in 1984, and as later specified in Article 5 of the Basic Law, i.e. the mini-constitution of Hong Kong, the capitalist system and way of life in Hong Kong should remain unchanged for 50 years. This promise not only settled the doubts of the Hong Kong people in the 1980s, but also resolved the confidence crisis of the international community due to the differences in the political and economic systems between Hong Kong and the People’s Republic of China (PRC). As stated in the record of a meeting between Thatcher and Deng in 1982, the Prime Minister regarded the question of Hong Kong as an ‘immediate issue’ as ‘money and skill would immediately begin to leave’ if such political differences were not addressed (Margaret Thatcher Foundation 1982).
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Counsel Limited Political Risk Report No.4: Post 2016 Legislative Council Election Debrief
    Executive Counsel Limited Political Risk Report No.4: Post 2016 Legislative Council Election DeBrief The 6th Legislative Council Makeup and Comparison with the 5th Legislative Council Pro-Beijing Pan-Democrats (24,-3) Localists/Self Determination (40,-2) (6,+5) Democratic Alliance for the Democratic Party (7,+1) Youngspiration (2, +2) Betterment and Progress of Hong Civic Party (6, +/-0) Civic Passion (1, +1) Kong (12, -1) Prof. Commons (2, +/-0) Demosisto (1, +1) Business & Professional Alliance (7, Labour Party (1, -3) Independent (2,+2) +/-0) People Power (1, -1) Proletariat Political Institute (0, -1) Federation of Trade Union (5, -1) League of Soc. Dem. (1, +/-0) Liberal Party (4, -1) Neighbourhood and Workers New People Party (3,+1) Services Centre (1,+/-0) New Forum (1) Independents (5, +2) The Federation of HK and Kowloon Association for Democracy and Labour Unions (1) People’s Livelihood (0, -1) Independents (7,+/-0) Neo Democrats (0, -1) Total Vote : 871,016 (40%) Total Vote : 775,578 (35%) Total Vote: 409,025 (19%) Legend: (Total Seats, Change (+/-)) Executive Counsel Limited’s Analysis Key Features • 2,202,283 votes casted, turnout rate 58.58% (+5%) • DAB is still the largest party in the Council (12 seats) , followed by Democratic Party and BPA (both 7 seats). • Average age of legislators decreases from 54 to 46.6 years old; Nathan Law of Demosisto (aged 23) becomes the youngest legislator in Hong Kong history, and will turn 54 in 2047 Localist Candidates From the overall vote gain, localist and pro-self-determination parties proved our comments in Harbour Times* that they are not simply a political quirk.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom in the World 2018 Hong Kong
    Hong Kong * Page 1 of 9 Published on Freedom House (https://freedomhouse.org) Home > Hong Kong * Hong Kong * Country: Hong Kong * Year: 2018 Freedom Status: Partly Free Political Rights: 5 Civil Liberties: 2 Aggregate Score: 59 Freedom Rating: 3.5 Overview: The people of Hong Kong, a special administrative region of China, have traditionally enjoyed substantial civil liberties and the rule of law under their local constitution, the Basic Law. However, the chief executive and half of the Legislative Council are chosen through indirect electoral systems that favor pro-Beijing interests, and the territory’s freedoms and autonomy have come under threat in recent years due to growing political and economic pressure from the mainland. Trend Arrow: Hong Kong received a downward trend arrow due to the expulsion of four prodemocracy lawmakers from the legislature, jail sentences against protest leaders, and other apparent efforts by pro-Beijing authorities to stamp out a movement calling for local self- determination. Political Rights and Civil Liberties: POLITICAL RIGHTS: 15 / 40 (−1) A. ELECTORAL PROCESS: 2 / 12 (−1) https://freedomhouse.org/print/50009 3/26/2018 Hong Kong * Page 2 of 9 A1. Was the current head of government or other chief national authority elected through free and fair elections? 0 / 4 Under 2010 electoral reforms, the chief executive, who serves a five-year term, is chosen by a 1,200-member election committee. Some 200,000 “functional constituency” voters—representatives of elite business and social sectors, many with close Beijing ties—elect 900 of the committee’s members, and the remaining 300 consist of Legco members, Hong Kong delegates to China’s National People’s Congress (NPC), religious representatives, and Hong Kong members of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC), a Chinese government advisory body.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Subcommittee on Retirement Protection To
    立法會 Legislative Council LC Paper No. CB(2)1871/15-16 Ref : CB2/PS/4/12 Panel on Welfare Services Report of Subcommittee on Retirement Protection Purpose 1. This paper reports on the deliberations of the Subcommittee on Retirement Protection ("the Subcommittee"). The Subcommittee 2. The Subcommittee was appointed by the Panel on Welfare Services ("the Panel") on 14 January 2013 to study issues relating to the protection of retirement life of all people, and to follow up on the proposal of setting up and implementation of universal retirement protection for all people in Hong Kong. The terms of reference of the Subcommittee are in Appendix I. 3. The Subcommittee commenced work on 25 February 2014. In accordance with House Rule 26(c), the approval of the House Committee was obtained on 9 January 2015 for the Subcommittee to continue its work in the 2014-2015 session. Pursuant to the decision made at the House Committee meeting on 9 October 2015, approval was further given by the House Committee for the Subcommittee to extend the period of work for three months until 31 December 2015, after which the Subcommittee has been placed on the waiting list till June 2016. Between January and May 2016 when the Subcommittee was placed on the waiting list, the Panel held two special meetings to discuss with the Administration and meet with deputations on related issues. 4. Hon CHAN Yuen-han and Hon CHEUNG Kwok-che were Chairman and Deputy Chairman of the Subcommittee respectively. The membership list of the Subcommittee is in Appendix II.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction: the Uniqueness of Hong Kong Democracy
    Notes Introduction: The Uniqueness of Hong Kong Democracy 1 . Charles Tilly, Democracy (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007), p. 7. 2 . Ibid . 3 . Ibid ., p. 9. 4 . Ibid . 5 . Ibid ., p. xi. 6 . Ibid . 7 . Ibid ., p. 13. 8 . Charles Tilly, Trust and Rule (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005), p. 12. 9 . Ibid. 10 . Ibid ., p. 104. 11 . Tilly, Democracy , p. 135. 12 . Ibid ., p. 136. 13 . Ibid ., p. 146. 14 . Ibid ., pp. 110–111. 15 . Ibid ., p. 110. 16 . Ibid ., p. 135. 17 . David Potter, “Explaining Democratization,” in David Potter, David Goldblatt, Margaret Kiloh and Paul Lewis, eds., Democratization (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1997), pp. 3–5. 18 . See, for example, Seymour Martin Lipset, Political Man (London: Heinemann, 1983). 19 . Ibid ., p. 21. 20 . Ibid . 21 . Ibid . 22 . Ibid ., p. 15. 23 . Guillermo O’Donnell and Philippe C. Schmitter, Transition from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies (Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986). 24 . Potter, “Explaining Democratization,” p. 29. 25 . Samuel P. Huntington, The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1993), p. 7. 26 . Ibid ., p. 38. 27 . Ibid ., pp. 65–66. 28 . Ibid ., p. 73. 29 . Ibid ., p. 86. 30 . Ibid ., pp. 93–94. 31 . Ibid ., p. 100. 32 . Ibid ., p. 122. 33 . Ibid ., p. 123. 34 . Ibid ., p. 142. 160 Notes 161 35 . Ibid ., p. 151. 36 . Ibid ., pp. 152–153. 37 . Ibid ., p. 159. 38 . Ibid ., p. 159. 39 . Ibid ., p. 171. 40 . Ibid ., p. 192. 41 . Ibid ., p. 199. 42 . Ibid ., p. 202. 43 . Ibid ., p.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes Have Been Seen by the Administration)
    立法會 Legislative Council LC Paper No. CB(2)1973/15-16 (These minutes have been seen by the Administration) Ref : CB2/PS/4/12 Panel on Welfare Services Subcommittee on Retirement Protection Minutes of meeting held on Monday, 20 June 2016, at 4:00 pm in Conference Room 3 of the Legislative Council Complex Members : Hon CHAN Yuen-han, SBS, JP (Chairman) present Hon CHEUNG Kwok-che (Deputy Chairman) Hon LEUNG Yiu-chung Hon LEUNG Kwok-hung Hon Frankie YICK Chi-ming, JP Hon CHAN Chi-chuen Dr Hon Fernando CHEUNG Chiu-hung Hon POON Siu-ping, BBS, MH Hon CHUNG Kwok-pan Members : Hon Albert HO Chun-yan absent Hon Alan LEONG Kah-kit, SC Hon LEUNG Che-cheung, BBS, MH, JP Hon TANG Ka-piu, JP Public Officers : Item I attending Session 1 Mr Stephen SUI, JP Under Secretary for Labour and Welfare - 2 - Mr Donald CHEN, JP Deputy Secretary for Labour and Welfare (2) Mr Eric LEE Principal Economist Economic Analysis and Business Facilitation Unit of the Financial Secretary's Office Session 2 Mr Matthew CHEUNG, GBS, JP Secretary for Labour and Welfare Mr Donald CHEN, JP Deputy Secretary for Labour and Welfare (2) Mr Eric LEE Principal Economist Economic Analysis and Business Facilitation Unit of the Financial Secretary's Office Attendance : Item I by invitation Session 1 Alliance for Universal Pension Mr Nick CHAN Organizer Industrial Relations Institute Miss LAU Yau-chun Organizer 老人福利關注組 Mr Kenny LAI Member - 3 - Kwai Chung Estate Residents' Rights Concern Group Mr CHEUNG Kai-bing Secretary 青年退保關注組 Mr KWOK Man-ho Member HK Catholic Commission for Labour
    [Show full text]
  • Survey: English
    Survey on 2016 Legislative Council Elections Public Governance Programme, Lingnan University Hello! We are from Lingnan University. We are conducting a survey on 2016 Legislative Council Elections. Is your number XXXX XXXX ? Among your household members, how many of them are registered voters? Yes, enter the number and find the computer-chosen one for interview. No, interview stops and say “thank you”. The survey is a part of an important research project. It is a bit long and will last for more than 15 minutes. Are you ok with that? 1. How interested would you say you are in politics? Are you very interested, somewhat interested, not very interested, or not at all interested? (1) Very interested (2) Somewhat interested (3) Not very interested (4) Not at all interested (7) Refused to answer (8) Don’t know 2. How closely do you follow politics on TV, radio, newspapers, or the Internet? Very closely, fairly closely, not very closely, or not at all? (1) Very closely (2) Fairly closely (3) Not very closely (4) Not at all (7) Refused to answer (8) Don’t know Please tell me whether you strongly agree, somewhat agree, neither agree nor disagree, somewhat disagree, or strongly disagree with each of the following statements. 3. [Do you strongly agree, somewhat agree, neither agree nor disagree, somewhat disagree, or strongly disagree with the following statement:] You feel you understand the most important political issues of this country. (1) Strongly agree (2) Somewhat agree (3) Neither agree nor disagree (4) Somewhat disagree (5) Strongly disagree (7) Refused to answer (8) Don’t know 4.
    [Show full text]
  • The Growth of “Localism” in Hong Kong
    Current affairs China perspectives The Growth of “Localism” in Hong Kong A New Path for the Democracy Movement? YING-HO KWONG series of political protests in recent years, including localist rallies maintain harmonious relations, and supported the reversion of sovereignty for the June 4 Massacre, anti-parallel trading protests, and the Mong from Britain to China after 1997 under the principle of “One Country, Two AKok Riot, have triggered concerns over the development of “localism” Systems.” (4) In fact, Hong Kong’s democrats have always been divided by (bentu zhuyi 本土主義 ) in Hong Kong. For decades, traditional pan-demo - ideological differences, but have sought room for co-operation on political cratic parties ( fan minzhupai 泛民主派 ) have been struggling with the Chi - issues. The collaboration among democrats strengthened during and after nese government over political development. Although many of them have the Tiananmen Massacre. During the 1989 democracy movement in China, persistently bargained with the Beijing leaders, progress towards democracy Hong Kong democrats formed the Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patri - remains stagnant. Thus, Hong Kong’s democrats have been beset by “tran - otic Democratic Movements in China to support the Beijing protesters. In sition fatigue,” which commonly exists in hybrid regimes that combine both the meantime, disagreements among democrats generally decreased be - democratic and authoritarian elements. (1) A growing number of Hong Kong cause the majority shared the common goal of supporting democratic de - people, especially youngsters, have become impatient, disappointed, and velopment in China against the bloody clampdown by the authorities. (5) sceptical towards the existing pan-democratic parties, and have shifted into The wave of democracy movements further intensified after 1997.
    [Show full text]
  • “Localism” in Hong Kong a New Path for the Democracy Movement?
    China Perspectives 2016/3 | 2016 China’s Policy in the China Seas The Growth of “Localism” in Hong Kong A New Path for the Democracy Movement? Ying-ho Kwong Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/chinaperspectives/7057 DOI: 10.4000/chinaperspectives.7057 ISSN: 1996-4617 Publisher Centre d'étude français sur la Chine contemporaine Printed version Date of publication: 1 September 2016 Number of pages: 63-68 ISSN: 2070-3449 Electronic reference Ying-ho Kwong, « The Growth of “Localism” in Hong Kong », China Perspectives [Online], 2016/3 | 2016, Online since 01 September 2016, connection on 14 September 2020. URL : http:// journals.openedition.org/chinaperspectives/7057 © All rights reserved Current affairs China perspectives The Growth of “Localism” in Hong Kong A New Path for the Democracy Movement? YING-HO KWONG series of political protests in recent years, including localist rallies maintain harmonious relations, and supported the reversion of sovereignty for the June 4 Massacre, anti-parallel trading protests, and the Mong from Britain to China after 1997 under the principle of “One Country, Two AKok Riot, have triggered concerns over the development of “localism” Systems.” (4) In fact, Hong Kong’s democrats have always been divided by (bentu zhuyi 本土主義 ) in Hong Kong. For decades, traditional pan-demo - ideological differences, but have sought room for co-operation on political cratic parties ( fan minzhupai 泛民主派 ) have been struggling with the Chi - issues. The collaboration among democrats strengthened during and after nese government over political development. Although many of them have the Tiananmen Massacre. During the 1989 democracy movement in China, persistently bargained with the Beijing leaders, progress towards democracy Hong Kong democrats formed the Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patri - remains stagnant.
    [Show full text]