James Hardwick Oral History Interview JERRY WALTERS
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Torpedoman Second Class Class Donald Witmer
Oral History of Torpedoman Second Class Class Donald Witmer Interviewed By Robert F. Naczi Naval Historical Foundation • Washington, D.C. Copyright © 1988 1 March 7, 1998 BOB NACZI: I am interviewing Donald Witmer, Donald was a torpedo man 2nd class on the USS TWIGGS (DD 591). Donald was a plank owner and served on the TWIGGS during her short but productive career in the United States Navy. In getting started I’d like to ask Donald to tell me something about his background before going into the Navy. DONALD WITMER: Well I was born in Lancaster PA, I didn’t really get around all that much before going in the Navy, my father was in the Army and he told me tales of sleeping in trenches and so forth, so I decided that the Navy would be the place for me. I’d either have a nice clean sack to crawl into at the end of the day, or I would have nothing at all and that turned out to be just about the case. When I graduated from high school in 1942, the war had already been under way and some of the people left our class to go into the service but most of them stayed to graduate. After I graduated, I investigated going into the Navy, but enlistments were closed at that time and right after Christmas--I think it was about the second day of the year--they opened enlistments briefly for the Navy and I thought this was my chance to get into the Navy and escape the Army because the draft board would have probably drafted me shortly. -
Marvin Robert Neitsch
Marvin Robert Neitsch Born August 20, 1914 died: 1 Nov 1942 Marvin Robert Neitsch was born on September 6, 1914, in Texas to IDA BIRKELBACH, age 29, and ROBERT WALTER NEITSCH, age 24. Zion Lutheran, Walburg, member Born: 9-06-1914 • Theon, Texas (source – Neitsch and Rowe family Tree by 1949Opa) 1920 Census: Justice Precinct 5, Williamson,Texas Walter Neitsch 29 head Ida Neitsch 33 wife Hugo Neitsch 10 son Thekle (sic) Neitsch 7 daughter Mar?Lin (sic) Neitsch 5 son Henry Neitsch 3 [3 1/12] son Norena Birkeldeash (sic --- Birkelbach) sister 17 1930 Census: Precinct 1, Williamson,Texas Walter Neitsch 39 head Ida Neitsch 44 wife Hugo Neitsch 20 son Theola Neitsch 18 daughter Marvin Neitsch 15 son Henry Neitsch 13 son Walter Neitsch 10 son Provided by Wendish Research Exchange, www.wendishresearch.org Norma Birkle Bock (sic -Birkelbach) sister-in-law 1940 Census: San Diego, San Diego, California U.S. Naval Training Station (April 3, 1940) Marvin R. Neitsch, born about 1915, Born-Texas, single, Seaman, Residence 1935 – Rural Williamson County, Texas From www.ancestry.com in the U.S. World War II Navy Muster Rolls, 1938-1949 Name: Marvin R Neitsch Ship, Station or Activity: Savannah Ship Number or Designation: CL-42 Muster Date: 31 May 1940 Name: Marvin R Neitsch Ship, Station or Activity: Pensacola Ship Number or Designation: CA-24 Muster Date: 30 Jun 1940 in the U.S. WWII Military Personnel Missing In Action or Lost At Sea, 1941-1946 Name: Marvin R Neitsch Date of Loss: 30 Nov 1942 0 Branch: U.S. -
Salvage Diary from 1 March – 1942 Through 15 November, 1943
Salvage Diary from 1 March – 1942 through 15 November, 1943 INDUSTRIAL DEPARTMENT WAR DIARY COLLECTION It is with deep gratitude to the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) in San Bruno, California for their kind permission in acquiring and referencing this document. Credit for the reproduction of all or part of its contents should reference NARA and the USS ARIZONA Memorial, National Park Service. Please contact Sharon Woods at the phone # / address below for acknowledgement guidelines. I would like to express my thanks to the Arizona Memorial Museum Association for making this project possible, and to the staff of the USS Arizona Memorial for their assistance and guidance. Invaluable assistance was provided by Stan Melman, who contributed most of the ship classifications, and Zack Anderson, who provided technical guidance and Adobe scans. Most of the Pacific Fleet Salvage that was conducted upon ships impacted by the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor occurred within the above dates. The entire document will be soon be available through June, 1945 for viewing. This salvage diary can be searched by any full or partial keyword. The Diaries use an abbreviated series of acronyms, most of which are listed below. Their deciphering is work in progress. If you can provide assistance help “fill in the gaps,” please contact: AMMA Archival specialist Sharon Woods (808) 422-7048, or by mail: USS Arizona Memorial #1 Arizona Memorial Place Honolulu, HI 96818 Missing Dates: 1 Dec, 1941-28 Feb, 1942 (entire 3 months) 11 March, 1942 15 Jun -
32 CFR Ch. VI (7–1–10 Edition) § 706.2
§ 706.2 32 CFR Ch. VI (7–1–10 Edition) § 706.2 Certifications of the Secretary TABLE ONE—Continued of the Navy under Executive Order Distance in 11964 and 33 U.S.C. 1605. meters of The Secretary of the Navy hereby forward masthead finds and certifies that each vessel list- Vessel Number light below ed in this section is a naval vessel of minimum required special construction or purpose, and height. that, with respect to the position of § 2(a)(i) Annex I the navigational lights listed in this section, it is not possible to comply USS RODNEY M. DAVIS .............. FFG 60 1.6 fully with the requirements of the pro- USS INGRAHAM ........................... FFG 61 1.37 USS FREEDOM ............................ LCS 1 5.99 visions enumerated in the Inter- USS INDEPENDENCE .................. LCS 2 4.91 national Regulations for Preventing USS OGDEN ................................. LPD 5 4.15 Collisions at Sea, 1972, without inter- USS DULUTH ................................ LPD 6 4.4 USS DUBUQUE ............................ LPD 8 4.2 fering with the special function of the USS DENVER ............................... LPD 9 4.4 vessel. The Secretary of the Navy fur- USS JUNEAU ................................ LPD 10 4.27 ther finds and certifies that the naviga- USS NASHVILLE ........................... LPD 13 4.38 USS TRIPOLI ................................ LPH 10 3.3 tional lights in this section are in the LCAC (class) .................................. LCAC 1 1 6.51 closest possible compliance with the through applicable provisions of the Inter- LCAC 100 national Regulations for Preventing LCAC (class) .................................. LCAC 1 7.84 through (Temp.) 2 Collisions at Sea, 1972. LCAC 100 USS INCHON ................................ MCS 12 3.0 TABLE ONE NR–1 ............................................. -
Department of the Navy, Dod § 706.2
Department of the Navy, DoD § 706.2 § 706.2 Certifications of the Secretary TABLE ONE—Continued of the Navy under Executive Order Distance in 11964 and 33 U.S.C. 1605. meters of The Secretary of the Navy hereby forward masthead finds and certifies that each vessel list- Vessel Number light below ed in this section is a naval vessel of minimum required special construction or purpose, and height. that, with respect to the position of § 2(a)(i) Annex I the navigational lights listed in this section, it is not possible to comply USS SAMUEL B. ROBERTS ........ FFG 58 1.6 fully with the requirements of the pro- USS KAUFFMAN ........................... FFG 59 1.6 USS RODNEY M. DAVIS .............. FFG 60 1.6 visions enumerated in the Inter- USS INGRAHAM ........................... FFG 61 1.37 national Regulations for Preventing USS FREEDOM ............................ LCS 1 5.99 Collisions at Sea, 1972, without inter- USS INDEPENDENCE .................. LCS 2 4.14 USS FORT WORTH ...................... LCS 3 5.965 fering with the special function of the USS CORONADO ......................... LCS 4 4.20 vessel. The Secretary of the Navy fur- USS MILWAUKEE ......................... LCS 5 6.75 ther finds and certifies that the naviga- USS JACKSON ............................. LCS 6 4.91 USS DETROIT ............................... LCS 7 6.80 tional lights in this section are in the USS MONTGOMERY .................... LCS 8 4.91 closest possible compliance with the USS LITTLE ROCK ....................... LCS 9 6.0 applicable provisions of the Inter- USS GABRIELLE GIFFORDS ....... LCS 10 4.91 national Regulations for Preventing USS SIOUX CITY .......................... LCS 11 5.98 USS OMAHA ................................. LCS 12 4.27 Collisions at Sea, 1972. -
1 the “Cactus Navy” at Guadalcanal
1 The “Cactus Navy” at Guadalcanal It was only a small action that met little resistance, but it can be ar- gued that the raid on Tasimboko saved the First Marine Division on Guadalcanal and set up the turning point in World War II. —Capt. Frank J. Guidone, USMC (Ret.), commander of Company Able, 1st Raider Battalion, on Guadalcanal1 In the early evening of 7 September 1942, the rifl e companies of the U.S. Marine Corps’ 1st Raider Battalion embarked in the destroyer- transports Manley (APD-1) and McKean (APD-5) and the patrol craft YP-239 and YP-346 at Kukum on the north coast of Guadalcanal, en route to a site twenty miles to the east to launch a raid on Japanese forces occupying Tasimboko village. Th e YPs were former San Diego tuna boats sent to the Solomons by the U.S. Navy for duty as sup- ply ships. Normally engaged in hauling food, fuel, supplies, and oc- casionally personnel from Tulagi to Guadalcanal across the span of water separating the two islands, they had been draft ed as a last resort, aft er APDs Little (APD-4) and Gregory (APD-3) had been sunk by the Imperial Japanese Navy (IJN) destroyers Yudachi, Hatsuyuki, and Murakumo two days earlier in the waters between Guadalcanal and Savo Island.2 Th e Manley and McKean were the only two remaining units of Transportation Division 12, initially comprised of the fi ve destroyer- transports Manley (APD-1), Colhoun (APD-2), Gregory (APD-3), Little (APD-4) and McKean (APD-5), which had been sent to the Sol- omons, following the Battle of Savo Island, to deliver badly-needed supplies and support to the Marines on Guadalcanal. -
The Evolution of the US Navy Into an Effective
The Evolution of the U.S. Navy into an Effective Night-Fighting Force During the Solomon Islands Campaign, 1942 - 1943 A dissertation presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Jeff T. Reardon August 2008 © 2008 Jeff T. Reardon All Rights Reserved ii This dissertation titled The Evolution of the U.S. Navy into an Effective Night-Fighting Force During the Solomon Islands Campaign, 1942 - 1943 by JEFF T. REARDON has been approved for the Department of History and the College of Arts and Sciences by Marvin E. Fletcher Professor of History Benjamin M. Ogles Dean, College of Arts and Sciences iii ABSTRACT REARDON, JEFF T., Ph.D., August 2008, History The Evolution of the U.S. Navy into an Effective Night-Fighting Force During the Solomon Islands Campaign, 1942-1943 (373 pp.) Director of Dissertation: Marvin E. Fletcher On the night of August 8-9, 1942, American naval forces supporting the amphibious landings at Guadalcanal and Tulagi Islands suffered a humiliating defeat in a nighttime clash against the Imperial Japanese Navy. This was, and remains today, the U.S. Navy’s worst defeat at sea. However, unlike America’s ground and air forces, which began inflicting disproportionate losses against their Japanese counterparts at the outset of the Solomon Islands campaign in August 1942, the navy was slow to achieve similar success. The reason the U.S. Navy took so long to achieve proficiency in ship-to-ship combat was due to the fact that it had not adequately prepared itself to fight at night. -
062218 Hookele a 1 Mp -KW-Ag.Indd
U.S. Navy fi le photos See pages A-3, A-4, A-5 Welcome to RIMPAC 2018 and B-1 June 22, 2018 www.issuu.com/navyregionhawaii www.hookelenews.com Volume 9 Issue 24 15th Wing welcomes new commander Story and photo by As the new commander, Capt. Nicole White Burks expressed his gratitude for the 15th Wing Public Affairs opportunity to lead the wing and spoke directly to Members of the 15th the Airmen of Joint Base Wing offered aloha to a Pearl Harbor-Hickam. new commander during a “To the men and women change of command cer- of the 15th Wing — I emony June 20. During cannot put into words the ceremony, Col. Kevin what an honor it is to be Gordon transferred here today,” he said. command to Col. W. “Thank you for raising Halsey Burks. your right hand and Lt. Gen. Kenneth Wils- volunteering to serve in bach, 11th Air Force a time of war. Since the commander, presided 2001 terror attacks a over the ceremony be- little over five thousand fore a crowd of Airmen, Airmen have joined to Sailors, Soldiers, civilian serve on active duty, both and military dignitaries, officer and enlisted side. and community leaders The road is never easy but at h istoric Hickam Field you continue to serve. To Base Operations. people all over the world, Wilsbach noted the you represent liberty. Be 15th Wing’s Airmen for proud of that. I’m proud their contributions and of that. I’m excited and impact to the Pacifi c Air deeply honored to serve Forces mission. -
Oregon's Marines: a Regional History of the United States Marine Corps
Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 11-3-1994 Oregon's Marines: A Regional History of the United States Marine Corps Michael Coleman Howard Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the History Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Howard, Michael Coleman, "Oregon's Marines: A Regional History of the United States Marine Corps" (1994). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 4768. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.6652 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. THESIS APPROVAL The abstract and thesis of Michael Coleman Howard for the Master of Arts in History were presented November 3, 1994, and accepted by the Thesis Committee and the department. COMMITTEE APPROVALS: Jon E. Mandaville Duncan Carter Rep~P\ntative of the office of Graduate studies DEPARTMENT APPROVAL: David A Johns I History Dep ******************************************************************** ACCEPTED FOR PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY BY THE LIBRARY b:A. v onlfikmk-1-- lfl1 ABSTRACT An abstract of the thesis of Michael Coleman Howard for the Master of Arts in History presented November 3, 1994. TITLE: Oregon's Marines: A Regional History of the United States Marine Corps The history of the United States Marine Corps in Oregon, and of the many Oregonians who have served as Marines, is a unique story which has never been told. -
Battle for Guadalcanal: As Viewed from the Perspective of the Concentration of Forces
Battle for Guadalcanal: As Viewed from the Perspective of the Concentration of Forces Tatsushi Saito 1. Introduction Guadalcanal was an important island for the Americans, since the securing of its airfield would be a necessary first step towards an assault on Rabaul. It was a vital island for the Japanese as well, since its possession, along with a successful assault of Port Moresby, would be necessary for the establishment of a superior strategic position in the Coral Sea area. Which side controlled the island therefore would have a significant impact on both operations and conduct of war in the future. Furthermore, Guadalcanal was roughly equidistant from the nearest major Japanese and American bases, which were Rabaul in the northwest and Espiritu Santo in the southeast, respectively, and which were each approximately 900 kilometers from Guadalcanal. The Japanese and American forces available for contesting the island were also roughly balanced, at least in Japan’s estimate of July 1942, with Japan able to pit twelve battleships and six aircraft carriers (four fleet and two light carriers) against the Americans’ nine battleships and three aircraft carriers.1 The capture of Henderson Airfield (which had been called Lunga Airfield by the Japanese) by the U.S. 1st Marine Division at the start of the campaign, and the resulting establishment of a defensive perimeter encompassing the airfield, which admittedly was not completely secure, was, however, a strong point in favor of the Americans. The ensuing Guadalcanal campaign thus essentially was a fight between the Americans, who tried to hold and expand their perimeter, and the Japanese, who made a series of attacks on the American perimeter. -
US Sport Diver 14 May 2017
DO YOU LOVE CHASING LITTLE STUFF IN THE SHALLOWS? FINNING THROUGH CURRENT WITH 20 SHARKS AT A TIME? EXPANDING YOUR EXOTIC FISH-ID LIST? EXPLORING HISTORIC WWII WRECKS? CAPTURING AMAZING IMAGES IN PERFECT VIZ? WHAT DESTINATION OFFERS ALL OF THIS, PLUS A WELCOMING CULTURE THAT GOES BACK 5,000 YEARS OR MORE? THIS IS THE SOLOMON ISLANDS CREDIT HERE PHOTO SPORTDIVER.COM | JULY/AUGUST 2017 47 WWII 75TH ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATIONS “DON’T On August 7, 1942, Allied forces com- posed mainly of U.S. Marines land- ed on Guadalcanal POKE and in the Florida Islands to try to deprive the Japanese of bases that threatened THE Allied supply and communication routes between the U.S., Australia, and New Zealand. BOMBS.” The Allies also intended to use Guadalcanal and Tulagi as bases to Eight divers titter as we settle into our liveaboard’s support a cam- spacious interior salon, where briefings are aug- paign to destroy an important mented by maps and critter lists displayed on a Japanese base big-screen TV. In capital letters topping the map of at Rabaul on New Britain. The a Tulagi harbor site called Garbage Patch is written Japanese made this admonition. A joke, right? multiple attempts to recover It’s not. “You’re gonna get your rust fix today,” Guadalcanal, lead- says Mossy, one of the Australian divemaster/in- ing to months of structors aboard Solomon Islands Dive Expeditions’ major land and sea battles until Taka. What’s left of an old Japanese fishery wharf the Japanese gave now overlooks a graveyard of wrecks. -
CONFIDENTIAL - Unclassified Upon Removal of Enclosure (1)
--~y----------------------------------------------------------~---------------------- CO i"~ Fl 0ENTIAL DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL HISTORICAL CENTER COMMANDER SUBMARINE FORCE DECLASSIFIED IA&W UNITED STATES PACIFIC FLEET PEARL HARBOR. HI 9686(}-6550 E.O. 1295~~ . ~;:'.a~~~_@ '. " 5760 Ser OOPI/e' '30 .l 12 JUL 1993 CONFIDENTIAL - Unclassified upon removal of enclosure (1) From: Commander Submarine Force, U.S. Pacific Fleet To: Director of Naval History (OP-09B9) Subj: COMMAND HISTORY FOR 1992 (OPNAV Report 5750-1) Ref: (a) OPNAVINST 5750.12C Encl: (1) 1992 COMSUBPAC Command History (2) Biography and photograph of RADM Henry C. McKinney, J FIt. -J-..•• - USN, COMSUBPAC [ 8, c'j r;-.Ji~-:-JJ~,. ..:r, //_'/":;" -J.:-;;Y-l.,. -.-/ 1. Enclosure (1) is forwarded in accordance with reference (a). Copy to: CINCPACFLT /.-', t • / .' CONFIDENTIAL · ., ----------_-~-(----=-~\;:-t----;;-\T\...------=,.......=----------- l..~,=,::J~ o€. CNFIDEN'rIAL 1992 COMSUBPAC COMMAND HISTORY SECTION I Mission I-I - - SECTION II Tactical Combat Systems 11-1 thru II-3 .. ') SECTION III Operations and Plans III-l thru III-7 SECTION IV Material and Logistics IV-l thru IV-4 SECTION V Supply and Financial Mgmt V-I thru V-7 SECTION VI Strategic Systems Division VI-l SECTION VII communications VII-l SECTION VIII Administrative and Personnel VIII-l thru VIII-2 t - .,.:.'\ I. (This page is UNCLASSIFIED) CLASSIFIED BY: OPNAVINST S5513.5A-37 DECLASSIFY ON: ORIGINATING AGENCY'S DETERMINATION REQUIRED ii DE@bpAiii5lFiED SECTION I MISSION l~ (U) The Commander of the Submarine Force U.S. Pacific Fleet is·the principal advisor to the Fleet Commander in Chief for submarine matters. Under his command are 47 submarines, including USS KAMEHAMEHA (SSBN 642) and USS ASHEVILLE (SSN 758) , which became operational assets of SUBPAC in July and September, respectively.