Nonpartisan Candidates & Measures
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Appeal Denied in Gates Case " I F Tuesday’S Supreme Court Session
24 - EVENING HERALD, Mon., Oct. 13, 1880 iUanrhpBtpr Cloudy Variable cloudiness WPATUCD ‘‘’‘*^5'’ Sunny tomorrow and continued cool. ► • j Appeal denied in Gates case " i f Tuesday’s Supreme Court session. By DAVE LAVALLEE C. Bieluch has set a hearing next after the initial order allowed during routine fingerprinting. headquarters at Troop H. Within two The motion to dismiss the appeal was Herald Reporter Tuesday at 10 a.m. to consider the Heiman to appeal the decision to ter Bieluch said the evidence sought hours of the completion of the tests. granted without an opinion from the carrying out of the initial order. minate the 2()-day stay. could be of material use to determine GLASTONBURY - The State court. Gates' blood will be analyzed at a ■ In mid-July Bieluch ruled that the " Q Supreme Court in Hartford has dis The Supreme Court's ruling, which whether the defendant committed state licensed hospital. state may obtain samples of hair, \ 'v :. y't missed defense attorney Maxwell dismissed Heiman’s appeal of the the murder. He said it could not Heiman, who is defending Larry blood, and body fluids from Gates to Heiman's appeal to block a Hartford order to obtain the evidence, also dis , "practicably” be obtained from any Gates is free on 6100,000 bond. Neal Gates, 19, of Glastonbury, who compare them with evidence found in Earthquake damage Superior Court order, requiring that missed the appeal of Bieluch’s other source, Mrs. Hart was found shot to death Homeless victims was arrested June 25 and charged in a car and on the body of Mrs. -
Women and the Presidency
Women and the Presidency By Cynthia Richie Terrell* I. Introduction As six women entered the field of Democratic presidential candidates in 2019, the political media rushed to declare 2020 a new “year of the woman.” In the Washington Post, one political commentator proclaimed that “2020 may be historic for women in more ways than one”1 given that four of these woman presidential candidates were already holding a U.S. Senate seat. A writer for Vox similarly hailed the “unprecedented range of solid women” seeking the nomination and urged Democrats to nominate one of them.2 Politico ran a piece definitively declaring that “2020 will be the year of the woman” and went on to suggest that the “Democratic primary landscape looks to be tilted to another woman presidential nominee.”3 The excited tone projected by the media carried an air of inevitability: after Hillary Clinton lost in 2016, despite receiving 2.8 million more popular votes than her opponent, ever more women were running for the presidency. There is a reason, however, why historical inevitably has not yet been realized. Although Americans have selected a president 58 times, a man has won every one of these contests. Before 2019, a major party’s presidential debates had never featured more than one woman. Progress toward gender balance in politics has moved at a glacial pace. In 1937, seventeen years after passage of the Nineteenth Amendment, Gallup conducted a poll in which Americans were asked whether they would support a woman for president “if she were qualified in every other respect?”4 * Cynthia Richie Terrell is the founder and executive director of RepresentWomen, an organization dedicated to advancing women’s representation and leadership in the United States. -
A History of Maryland's Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016
A History of Maryland’s Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016 A History of Maryland’s Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016 Published by: Maryland State Board of Elections Linda H. Lamone, Administrator Project Coordinator: Jared DeMarinis, Director Division of Candidacy and Campaign Finance Published: October 2016 Table of Contents Preface 5 The Electoral College – Introduction 7 Meeting of February 4, 1789 19 Meeting of December 5, 1792 22 Meeting of December 7, 1796 24 Meeting of December 3, 1800 27 Meeting of December 5, 1804 30 Meeting of December 7, 1808 31 Meeting of December 2, 1812 33 Meeting of December 4, 1816 35 Meeting of December 6, 1820 36 Meeting of December 1, 1824 39 Meeting of December 3, 1828 41 Meeting of December 5, 1832 43 Meeting of December 7, 1836 46 Meeting of December 2, 1840 49 Meeting of December 4, 1844 52 Meeting of December 6, 1848 53 Meeting of December 1, 1852 55 Meeting of December 3, 1856 57 Meeting of December 5, 1860 60 Meeting of December 7, 1864 62 Meeting of December 2, 1868 65 Meeting of December 4, 1872 66 Meeting of December 6, 1876 68 Meeting of December 1, 1880 70 Meeting of December 3, 1884 71 Page | 2 Meeting of January 14, 1889 74 Meeting of January 9, 1893 75 Meeting of January 11, 1897 77 Meeting of January 14, 1901 79 Meeting of January 9, 1905 80 Meeting of January 11, 1909 83 Meeting of January 13, 1913 85 Meeting of January 8, 1917 87 Meeting of January 10, 1921 88 Meeting of January 12, 1925 90 Meeting of January 2, 1929 91 Meeting of January 4, 1933 93 Meeting of December 14, 1936 -
Perry Willis
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-781 CONGRESSMAN RON PAUL, et al., ) (CKK, KLH, RJL) Plaintiffs, ) ) Consolidated with v. ) CIVIL ACTION NOS. ) 02-CV-582 (CKK, KLH, RJL) ) (Lead) FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, et al., ) 02-CV-581 (CKK, KLH, RJL) Defendants. ) 02-CV-633 (CKK, KLH, RJL) ) 02-CV-751 (CKK, KLH, RJL) ) 02-CV-753 (CKK, KLH, RJL) ) 02-CV-754 (CKK, KLH, RJL) ) 02-CV-874 (CKK, KLH, RJL) ) 02-CV-875 (CKK, KLH, RJL) ) 02-CV-877 (CKK, KLH, RJL) ) 02-CV-881 (CKK, KLH, RJL) REPORT OF PERRY WILLIS 1. My name is Perry Willis. I have spent the past 20 years working almost full time in direct professional involvement with state, local, and federal campaigns, and with state, local, and national Libertarian Party organizations. Because of my extensive practical experience with the real world effects of the federal campaign finance regulations, I have been asked to provide a report concerning those effects on challengers, and on Libertarian Party candidates in particular, both under the FECA and the BCRA. Actual experience with the real practical effects of campaign regulations has taught me a host of consequences of these laws that the scholarly studies in this area that I have read do not cover fully. I have agreed to provide this report and the cross-examine at no fee, only reimbursement for expenses. Below is a brief list of my professional experience followed by a summary of specific work activities as they relate to federal campaign regulation. -
Ron Paul for President!
- ~ ~~ Turks? The Turkish zone now Ron Paul for ginning to spread here: e.g., -is almost totally Turk, and that information and commu- likewise for the Greek zone. President! nication seems to be freer in The big problem, however, is by M.N.R. and Russia, where we could all that when the Turks invaded L.H.R., Jr. watch the coup and the revo- Cyprus in 1974 they were, as 1991 was a remarkable lution, than iri the US., where usually happens in these mat- year for human liberty. In the our media were puppets of the Pentagon displaying a phony ters, interested less in ethnic three days of August that Nintendo war in the Gulf. justice than in helping out their shook the world, the whole Here at home, President own ethnic comrades. As a world watched on TV as ideas Bush, who licd so notoriously result, they grabbed far too triumphed over guns, as the much territory, ensuring that peoples of Russia and the about “read my lips” on taxes, who has been blithely ex- the excess land would be !soviet Empire, wielding the panding government spend- Greek-free by forcibly eject- idea of liberty as a mighty ing 200,000 Greeks from their banner, brought down the ing and deficits at a rate un- precedented in northern zone. Justice would cr ue I, seem ing I y American his- require the Turks allowing the impregnable to- tory, who is Greek expellees back into talitarian despo- bringing even their homes, compensating tism of Soviet more burdens them for their losses, and even Communism. -
LIBERTY PLEDGE NEWSLETTER Published Exclusively for Members of the Libertarian Party's Monthly Pledge Program Perot Quits! Marrou the Only Real Choice for Change
July 92 LIBERTY PLEDGE NEWSLETTER Published exclusively for members of the Libertarian Party's Monthly Pledge Program Perot Quits! Marrou the Only Real Choice for Change In the wake of Ross Perot's announcement last week the news, which was included in a New York Times that he was not running for President, LP phones article that quoted 10 other key political figures, have been ringing off the hook around the country. including Bush, Clinton, Democratic National Committee Chair Ron Brown, and House Minority In the 36 hours after Perot's announcement, for Leader Bob Michel. example, our national 800 number logged over 2,000 calls, many from former Perot backers looking for a Many Perot backers had never been active in politics new candidate and possibly a new political home. before this year. To reach these people, the LP will send a prospecting mailing to Perot petition National office staffers were unable to handle regular circulators whose names and addresses we can obtain business as they all took turns soothing distraught from Secretaries of State in those states where Perot callers on our regular phone line and offering them has already turned in petitions. information about the Marrou/Lord ticket. Media coverage for both the Marrou/Lord ticket and LP of Los Angeles County staffer Don Meyer talked the LP has skyrocketed, with appearances on Larry with 75 callers in the first few hours, some of whom King's radio show, as well as C-SPAN's Road to the were "practically in tears." National Chair Mary White House and Viewer Call-In, planned for this Gingell received a call from a local Perot coordinator coming week. -
REPUBLICAN for State Senator
vote am let Information Your offici~l .l91{) .Pri~ Y:<>ters' Pamphlet; ip YOU MUST BE REGISTERED 20 DAYS BEFORE THE accordance with. f.* nf!w 1977 Qregqn l~w, is .divideclinlli ELECTION IN ORDER FOR YOUR NAME TO BE IN fmJr separat~ ~ions. .. < ·.. · . < CLUDED IN THE POLL BOOK. All materialr~l~tting iW f!l~~~ure~ .·appears first. ·'fbi$ in~l~ ;aeh ~~tui:JI)neasur¢, th~ h$-llot titl~; an imp~r~ You may retester and vote within 20 days of .. ti$.l~~~~~t ~laining t~tti~~ and ·i~ ~ffeet .~· election day if: ··•·•• ~.Y ~~en.~.fiJ~ ])y.pro:P()~!lt$1iln9/or opp<m~nts· ';['b,~ 1. You deliver to the appropriate county clerk or a person laW a~l~'f:S t~ legi~~~ture to sul)rtrit an argutne~ti~fa\'Pf .· of ~ . q1easJ;tre .· jt re.f~l'S tO the . })OOple. Cit~:dS or designated by the county clerk a completed voter registra ~rg~~tioo$ . may al~ .file arguments by P\ire~i~ tion fonn and obtain a "Certificate of Registration." space for $300 or suf).ndtting a petition signed ])y ~®9 IMPORTANT: If the county clerk receives your applica tion more than ten days prior to election day, your el~t$: . .... < / ••• . .. ·.. ·· ··•···•••······• certificate will be mailed to you. During the last ten days ....· .. 'fP~. ~el!;t .·t\v~ ~~~M (i()ntain .material. $ttbmi~ ~/ before the election you must obtain the certificate in can(i.i(i4f.es for ~~~an.~ffices. This y~ar REPUBLIC~ person. Certificates are issued by the county clerk or .ap~.firSt, PEM!()¢~TS ap~.se(X)t).(i, Tbe 9J'der '1~ . -
2018 Awards Committee Report
2018 AWARDS COMMITTEE REPORT Submitted to: Libertarian National Committee, Apr. 17, 2018 Submitted by: James W. Lark, III Region 5 Representative, Libertarian National Committee Member, 2018 Awards Committee The members of the 2018 Awards Committee are Tim Hagan, Daniel Hayes, and Jim Lark; these members were elected by the LNC during the December 2017 meeting. It is likely two additional members will be elected during the upcoming LNC meeting in Denver. An article soliciting nominations for the 2018 awards appeared on LP.org on Mar. 30; the article is available at www.lp.org/call-nominations-2018-libertarian-party-awards/. A similar article will appear in the next issue of LP News. In addition, solicitations for nominations will be sent to the LP e-mail list; such a solicitation was sent on Apr. 12. Submissions should be sent to [email protected]. The deadline for submissions is 5:00 p.m. EDT on May 31. Please note that the committee has already received several nominations. Two awards ceremonies are scheduled to take place during the LP national convention. At this moment we are uncertain of the dates and times for the ceremonies. APPENDIX: Libertarian Party national award recipients and Hall of Liberty members 1996: Samuel Adams Award: Don Ernsberger Thomas Paine Award: Jacob Hornberger Thomas Jefferson Award: David Nolan 1998: Samuel Adams Award: Steve Dasbach Thomas Paine Award: Harry Browne Thomas Jefferson Award: David Bergland 2000: Samuel Adams Award: Richard Rider Thomas Paine Award: Michael Cloud Thomas Jefferson Award: Ed Clark -
Shapiro Arato LLP ' O.Tiq ! R,
500 Fifth Avenue, 40th Floor New York, NY 10110 tel: 212-257-48B0 tax:212-202r6417 •Jr.. sa Shapiro Arato LLP ' www.shapiroarato.com O.Tiq ! r, .- . r,-, Alexandra A.E. Shapiro 1 r: / [email protected] Direct; 212-257-4881 ClrPICr June 18,2015 VIA HAND DELIVERY Office of the General Counsel Federal Election Commission 999 E Street, N.W. MUR# Washington, D.C. 20463 Re: MUR 6869, In the Matter of the Commission on Presidential Debates, et al. To Whom It May Concern: We represent the Libertarian National Committee, Inc., which controls and manages the affairs of the United States Libertarian Party (the "Libertarian Party"). On its behalf, we respectfully request to join the Complaint against the Commissiori on Presidential Debates and certain of its directors, filed on behalf of Level the Playing Field and Peter Ackeiman In the Matter of the Commission on Presidential Debates, et al, MUR 6869. The Libertarian Party shares the views of Level the Playing Field and Dr. Ackerman that the Commission on Presidential Debates ("CPD") and certain of its directors (the "Named Directors") have violated the Federal Election Campaign Act and the Commission's regulations in connection with the CPD's hosting of general election presidential debates. The Libertarian Party asserts no new allegations, and instead incorporates fully the allegations against the CPD and the Named Directors set forth in the Complaint in MUR 6869. Accordingly, the Commission should permit the Libertarian Party to join the Complaint in MUR 6869 rather than initiating a new MUR and treating the Libertarian Party's request to join as a new administrative complaint. -
Advisory Opinion 2004-34
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION Washington, DC 20463 December 2, 2004 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED ADVISORY OPINION 2004-40 Joseph J. Miller, Jr. Treasurer Libertarian Party of Maryland 211 Coronet Drive Linthicum Heights, MD 21090-1706 Dear Mr. Miller, We are responding to your inquiry regarding the status of the Libertarian Party of Maryland (the “Party”) as a State party committee of a political party under the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended (the “Act”), and Commission regulations. In this opinion, the Commission concludes that the Party qualifies as a State party committee because (1) the Party is a political party that is affiliated with the national committee of the Libertarian Party, (2) is responsible for the day-to-day operation of the Libertarian Party at the State level, and (3) is part of the official Libertarian Party structure. Background The facts of this request are presented in letters dated September 27 and October 18 and 22, 2004. The Party’s constitution (the “Party Constitution”) details various aspects of the organization of the Party. It illustrates how the Party, through the State Central Committee and the Local Central Committee in each county, engages in various activities in Maryland, including: creating a yearly plan of action to promote the Party in Maryland, communicating regularly with its members, nominating candidates for State and local AO 2004-40 Page 2 public offices, supporting the election of the Party’s candidates, and engaging in educational social, and fundraising activities to advance the Party’s goals.1 The Party has provided printouts from the Maryland State Board of Elections website that show that the Party placed candidates for Federal office on the Maryland ballot for the 1988, 1992, 1996, and 2000 Presidential elections. -
Voters' Pamphlet
STATE OF OREGON VOTERS' PAMPHLET GENERAL ELECTION November 2, 1976 Complied and Distributed by CLAY MYERS Secretary of State This Voters' Pamphlet Is the personal property of the recipient elector to assist him at the Polls. (ORS 255.025(3)). See page 2 for Voter Instructions and recent election law changes. 2 _______________ Official Voters' Pamphlet INFORMATION STATEMENT The material contained in the Voters' Pamphlet is Written either by the candidate or by designated political committee, by supporters or opponents of ballot measures and by statutorily appointed committees. The Secretary of State then compiles and publishes the statements supplied by the candidates or organizations. Candidates and committees not submitting Voters' Pamphlet material by the legal deadline or who choose not to purchase space are not allocated space in this publication, Each household in the state will receive one Voters' Pamphlet to be shared by all voting members of the household. Additional copies of the Pamphlet are available at the Post Office, Courthouses and other public buildings. VOTER REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS NAME CHANGES You must be registered by October 2, 1976, to have your If your name has changed within 60 days before an election name printed in the poll book. and you have not re-registered, you may vote by presenting proof of the name change to the Election Board at your precinct. YOU MAY REGISTER TO VOTE IF: 1. You are a citizen of the United States 2. You will be 18 or older on election day VOTING BY ABSENTEE BALLOT 3. You are a resident of Oregon YOUMAY APPLY FORAN ABSENTEE BALLOT IF: 4. -
Third Parties in the U.S. Political System: What External and Internal Issues Shape Public Perception of Libertarian Party/Polit
University of Texas at El Paso DigitalCommons@UTEP Open Access Theses & Dissertations 2019-01-01 Third Parties in the U.S. Political System: What External and Internal Issues Shape Public Perception of Libertarian Party/Politicians? Jacqueline Ann Fiest University of Texas at El Paso, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.utep.edu/open_etd Part of the Communication Commons Recommended Citation Fiest, Jacqueline Ann, "Third Parties in the U.S. Political System: What External and Internal Issues Shape Public Perception of Libertarian Party/Politicians?" (2019). Open Access Theses & Dissertations. 1985. https://digitalcommons.utep.edu/open_etd/1985 This is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UTEP. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open Access Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UTEP. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THIRD PARTIES IN THE U.S. POLITICAL SYSTEM WHAT EXTERNAL AND INTERNAL ISSUES SHAPE PUBLIC PRECEPTION OF LIBERTARIAN PARTY/POLITICIANS? JACQUELINE ANN FIEST Master’s Program in Communication APPROVED: Eduardo Barrera, Ph.D., Chair Sarah De Los Santos Upton, Ph.D. Pratyusha Basu, Ph.D. Stephen Crites, Ph.D. Dean of the Graduate School Copyright © by Jacqueline Ann Fiest 2019 Dedication This paper is dedicated to my dear friend Charlotte Wiedel. This would not have been possible without you. Thank you. THIRD PARTIES IN THE U.S. POLITICAL SYSTEM WHAT EXTERNAL AND INTERNAL ISSUES SHAPE PUBLIC PRECEPTION OF LIBERTARIAN PARTY/POLITICIANS? by JACQUELINE ANN FIEST, BA THESIS Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at El Paso in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATION THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO May 2019 Table of Contents Table of Contents ......................................................................................................................