DOCSLIB.ORG

Shapiro Arato LLP ' O.Tiq ! R,

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Shapiro Arato LLP ' O.Tiq ! R, 500 Fifth Avenue, 40th Floor New York, NY 10110 tel: 212-257-48B0 tax:212-202r6417 •Jr.. sa Shapiro Arato LLP ' www.shapiroarato.com O.Tiq ! r, .- . r,-, Alexandra A.E. Shapiro 1 r: / [email protected] Direct; 212-257-4881 ClrPICr June 18,2015 VIA HAND DELIVERY Office of the General Counsel Federal Election Commission 999 E Street, N.W. MUR# Washington, D.C. 20463 Re: MUR 6869, In the Matter of the Commission on Presidential Debates, et al. To Whom It May Concern: We represent the Libertarian National Committee, Inc., which controls and manages the affairs of the United States Libertarian Party (the "Libertarian Party"). On its behalf, we respectfully request to join the Complaint against the Commissiori on Presidential Debates and certain of its directors, filed on behalf of Level the Playing Field and Peter Ackeiman In the Matter of the Commission on Presidential Debates, et al, MUR 6869. The Libertarian Party shares the views of Level the Playing Field and Dr. Ackerman that the Commission on Presidential Debates ("CPD") and certain of its directors (the "Named Directors") have violated the Federal Election Campaign Act and the Commission's regulations in connection with the CPD's hosting of general election presidential debates. The Libertarian Party asserts no new allegations, and instead incorporates fully the allegations against the CPD and the Named Directors set forth in the Complaint in MUR 6869. Accordingly, the Commission should permit the Libertarian Party to join the Complaint in MUR 6869 rather than initiating a new MUR and treating the Libertarian Party's request to join as a new administrative complaint. With this letter, please find one original and three copies of the Libertarian Party's Complaint and Request to Join Complaint in MUR 6869, as well as four copies of the Complaint in MUR 6869 and its two accompanying volumes of exhibits, and a DVD containing electronic copies of these documents. Please contact me if the Commission has any questions or needs additional information. We hope that the Commission will move expeditiously to address our request to join the Complaint, as well as to address the matters raised in the Complaint. Sincerely, Alexandradra A:i£AM. Shapiro'.Shapirb' End. cc: Kim Collins, Office of Complaints Examination and Legal Administration (via e-mail) 5 Q BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION the Matter of o -n era Commission on Presidential Debates, ... I ci M Frank Fahrenkopf, Jr., Michael D. McCurry, •r-Ji-i Howard G. Buffett, John C. Danforth, John Griffen, Antonia Hemaiidez, John I. Jenkins, Newton N. Minow, , n- Richard D. Parsons, Dorothy Ridings, Alan K. Simpson, and Janet Brown ro* • Z': c i MUR # MA-Z- I REOUEST TO JOIN COMPLAINT IN MUR 6869 OR COMPLAINT SHAPIRO ARATO LLP 500 Filth Avenue 40th Floor New York, New York 10110 Phone: (21.2)257-4880 Fax: (212)202-6417 Allorneys for Complainant Libertarian National Committee, Inc. Complainant Libertarian National Committee, Inc., which, controls and manages the affairs of the United States Libertarian. Party (the "Libertarian Party"), joins the Complaint of Level the Playing Field and Peter Ackerman filed before the Federal Election Commission In the Matter of Commission on Presidential Debates, et al, MU.R 6869 (the "Complaint"). The Libertarian Party shares the views of Level the Playing Field and Dr. Ackerman that the Commission on Presidential Debates ("CPD") and certain of its directors, in connection with tlieir hosting of general election presidential debates, have violated the Federal Election Campaign Act and the regulations of the Federal Election Commission, for the reasons set forth in detail in the Complaint, which are incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein. See 52 U.S.C. §§ 301.18(a), 30116(i),,30103, 30104; 11 C.F.R. § 110.13. The Libertarian Party is the third largest political party in the coutitry. Its address is 1444 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA 22314. Founded in 1971, the Libertarian Party has nominated presidential candidates during every presidential election since its formation, including Ed Clark in 1980, who appeared on the ballot of all 50 states and the District of Columbia; David Bergiand in 1984, who received the third greatest number of votes in the presidential election; Ron Paul in 1988, who was on the ballot in 46 states and the District of Columbia and received the third most voles in the presidential election; Andre Marrou in 1992, who was on the ballot of every state and the District of Columbia; Flarry Browne in 1996, who was on the ballot of every state and the District of Columbia - the first time in United States history a "third party" earned ballot status in all 50 states and the District of Columbia for a second consecutive time; Harry Browne again in 2000, who headed a ticket of 1,436 Libertarian Party candidates, including 256 candidates for the U.S. House of Representatives; Michael Badnarik in 2004, who was on the ballot in 48 states; Bob Barr in 2008, who led a ticket iri.an election in which fifty Libertarians were elected, or re­ elected; and Gary Johnson in 2012, who received 1,275,951 votes, in an election during which six of the Libertarian Party candidates for office also received, a total of over one million votes. Libertarian Party presidential candidates, including Governor Johnson in 2012, have been excluded from all general election presidential debates since the CPD adopted the selection criteria challenged in the Complaint:. .For the reasons set forth in the Complaint of Level the Playing Field and Peter Ackerman In the Matter of the Commission on Presidential Debates, et al, MUR 6869, the Libertarian Party respectfully requests that the F.EC find the CPD and its directors have violated the Federal Election Campaign Act and the regulations of the Federal Election Commi ssion, and grant the relief sought in the Complaint. Dated this ft+^day of June, 2015. Respectfully submitted, Libert^an National dpmrniti^, Inc. By: Robert C.W. Benedict, Jr., Executive Director Signed and sworn to before me this 1 ^ day of June, 2015 ROBERT STEVEN KRAUS Notary Public Commonwealth o» Virginia 7514213 My Commission F*p- Notary Public 1 S] H-Zy I 3 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Suffolk University Virginia General Election Voters SUPRC Field
    Suffolk University Virginia General Election Voters AREA N= 600 100% DC Area ........................................ 1 ( 1/ 98) 164 27% West ........................................... 2 51 9% Piedmont Valley ................................ 3 134 22% Richmond South ................................. 4 104 17% East ........................................... 5 147 25% START Hello, my name is __________ and I am conducting a survey for Suffolk University and I would like to get your opinions on some political questions. We are calling Virginia households statewide. Would you be willing to spend three minutes answering some brief questions? <ROTATE> or someone in that household). N= 600 100% Continue ....................................... 1 ( 1/105) 600 100% GEND RECORD GENDER N= 600 100% Male ........................................... 1 ( 1/106) 275 46% Female ......................................... 2 325 54% S2 S2. Thank You. How likely are you to vote in the Presidential Election on November 4th? N= 600 100% Very likely .................................... 1 ( 1/107) 583 97% Somewhat likely ................................ 2 17 3% Not very/Not at all likely ..................... 3 0 0% Other/Undecided/Refused ........................ 4 0 0% Q1 Q1. Which political party do you feel closest to - Democrat, Republican, or Independent? N= 600 100% Democrat ....................................... 1 ( 1/110) 269 45% Republican ..................................... 2 188 31% Independent/Unaffiliated/Other ................. 3 141 24% Not registered
    [Show full text]
  • December 2020 Edition
    The Search for Brave Candidates While many people in the party were thrilled about having a by Amber Jewell candidate like Jo Jorgensen, many others were extremely disappointed. They believed her to be a cookie cutter Libertarians often candidate, put into place as a safe option – and several ridicule those who believed that she wasn’t even the best option with which to support the two-party play it safe. On the flip side, her running mate Spike Cohen system. They strongly was seen as a force to be reckoned with. His presence showed oppose the idea of a certain amount of strength through his passion and choosing “the lesser of communication that made him a great candidate. two evils” and use the oppositional argument As a third party, Libertarians have to work harder than the old against everyone who parties in order to be taken seriously. This has created a claims that a binary challenge in choosing candidates. Many candidates want to be choice is the only way. seen as boisterous so that they can draw attention to the LP in For example, in this past an effort to bring in more members. Others may only want to election, most people be “paper candidates,” not actively involved in campaigning, seemed to despise the just to get names on ballots. But choosing a serious candidate choices of Donald that does not reflect that same boring tactics as the Trump and Joe Biden; so, Libertarians tried vehemently to Republicans and Democrats can be tough. remind others that there are other options.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Maryland's Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016
    A History of Maryland’s Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016 A History of Maryland’s Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016 Published by: Maryland State Board of Elections Linda H. Lamone, Administrator Project Coordinator: Jared DeMarinis, Director Division of Candidacy and Campaign Finance Published: October 2016 Table of Contents Preface 5 The Electoral College – Introduction 7 Meeting of February 4, 1789 19 Meeting of December 5, 1792 22 Meeting of December 7, 1796 24 Meeting of December 3, 1800 27 Meeting of December 5, 1804 30 Meeting of December 7, 1808 31 Meeting of December 2, 1812 33 Meeting of December 4, 1816 35 Meeting of December 6, 1820 36 Meeting of December 1, 1824 39 Meeting of December 3, 1828 41 Meeting of December 5, 1832 43 Meeting of December 7, 1836 46 Meeting of December 2, 1840 49 Meeting of December 4, 1844 52 Meeting of December 6, 1848 53 Meeting of December 1, 1852 55 Meeting of December 3, 1856 57 Meeting of December 5, 1860 60 Meeting of December 7, 1864 62 Meeting of December 2, 1868 65 Meeting of December 4, 1872 66 Meeting of December 6, 1876 68 Meeting of December 1, 1880 70 Meeting of December 3, 1884 71 Page | 2 Meeting of January 14, 1889 74 Meeting of January 9, 1893 75 Meeting of January 11, 1897 77 Meeting of January 14, 1901 79 Meeting of January 9, 1905 80 Meeting of January 11, 1909 83 Meeting of January 13, 1913 85 Meeting of January 8, 1917 87 Meeting of January 10, 1921 88 Meeting of January 12, 1925 90 Meeting of January 2, 1929 91 Meeting of January 4, 1933 93 Meeting of December 14, 1936
    [Show full text]
  • September 2005 a Brief Schedule of Conference Is Grass Roots Activist Training Events the Main Track at the Week- Ceive a CD-ROM Resource Book
    Lone Star Liberty The Official Monthly Newsletter of the Libertarian Party of Texas September 2005 A Brief Schedule of Conference is Grass Roots Activist Training Events The main track at the Week- ceive a CD-ROM resource book. end For Winners Conference is the In order to help keep the costs The Weekend for Winners will Grassroots Activist Training being pro- down in bringing the training to Texas, kickoff 6 p.m Friday, September 16 vided by the Leadership Institute. The it will be open to anyone, regardless with a reception at host hotel, Radisson Institute is providing professional train- of Party affiliation. As a result we are Town Lake in Austin. (Registration ers to come to Austin and provide two able to offer professional services for will open at 4 p.m.) The reception will full days of workshops for anyone in- just $100. feature light snacks and the live music terested in effective politics. Because candidates need pic- of Too Blue. (www.tooblue-austin- The training covers all aspects tures, we have arranged for Jayne band.com) of campaigning including fundraising, Allen, of Quintessence Photography, to Saturday's events begin bright outreach, issue development, presen- offer onsite non-copyright digital pho- and early at 8:30 a.m. You can choose tations, etc. Participants will also re- tographs. Track 1, Track 2, or if you are under 12 you can choose the Children's Pro- Track 2 Focus: Training, Issues & Outreach gram. See the neighboring articles and The professional activist train- On Sunday, Wes will host a page 2 for information.
    [Show full text]
  • Perry Willis
    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-781 CONGRESSMAN RON PAUL, et al., ) (CKK, KLH, RJL) Plaintiffs, ) ) Consolidated with v. ) CIVIL ACTION NOS. ) 02-CV-582 (CKK, KLH, RJL) ) (Lead) FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, et al., ) 02-CV-581 (CKK, KLH, RJL) Defendants. ) 02-CV-633 (CKK, KLH, RJL) ) 02-CV-751 (CKK, KLH, RJL) ) 02-CV-753 (CKK, KLH, RJL) ) 02-CV-754 (CKK, KLH, RJL) ) 02-CV-874 (CKK, KLH, RJL) ) 02-CV-875 (CKK, KLH, RJL) ) 02-CV-877 (CKK, KLH, RJL) ) 02-CV-881 (CKK, KLH, RJL) REPORT OF PERRY WILLIS 1. My name is Perry Willis. I have spent the past 20 years working almost full time in direct professional involvement with state, local, and federal campaigns, and with state, local, and national Libertarian Party organizations. Because of my extensive practical experience with the real world effects of the federal campaign finance regulations, I have been asked to provide a report concerning those effects on challengers, and on Libertarian Party candidates in particular, both under the FECA and the BCRA. Actual experience with the real practical effects of campaign regulations has taught me a host of consequences of these laws that the scholarly studies in this area that I have read do not cover fully. I have agreed to provide this report and the cross-examine at no fee, only reimbursement for expenses. Below is a brief list of my professional experience followed by a summary of specific work activities as they relate to federal campaign regulation.
    [Show full text]
  • Ron Paul for President!
    - ~ ~~ Turks? The Turkish zone now Ron Paul for ginning to spread here: e.g., -is almost totally Turk, and that information and commu- likewise for the Greek zone. President! nication seems to be freer in The big problem, however, is by M.N.R. and Russia, where we could all that when the Turks invaded L.H.R., Jr. watch the coup and the revo- Cyprus in 1974 they were, as 1991 was a remarkable lution, than iri the US., where usually happens in these mat- year for human liberty. In the our media were puppets of the Pentagon displaying a phony ters, interested less in ethnic three days of August that Nintendo war in the Gulf. justice than in helping out their shook the world, the whole Here at home, President own ethnic comrades. As a world watched on TV as ideas Bush, who licd so notoriously result, they grabbed far too triumphed over guns, as the much territory, ensuring that peoples of Russia and the about “read my lips” on taxes, who has been blithely ex- the excess land would be !soviet Empire, wielding the panding government spend- Greek-free by forcibly eject- idea of liberty as a mighty ing 200,000 Greeks from their banner, brought down the ing and deficits at a rate un- precedented in northern zone. Justice would cr ue I, seem ing I y American his- require the Turks allowing the impregnable to- tory, who is Greek expellees back into talitarian despo- bringing even their homes, compensating tism of Soviet more burdens them for their losses, and even Communism.
    [Show full text]
  • LIBERTY PLEDGE NEWSLETTER Published Exclusively for Members of the Libertarian Party's Monthly Pledge Program Perot Quits! Marrou the Only Real Choice for Change
    July 92 LIBERTY PLEDGE NEWSLETTER Published exclusively for members of the Libertarian Party's Monthly Pledge Program Perot Quits! Marrou the Only Real Choice for Change In the wake of Ross Perot's announcement last week the news, which was included in a New York Times that he was not running for President, LP phones article that quoted 10 other key political figures, have been ringing off the hook around the country. including Bush, Clinton, Democratic National Committee Chair Ron Brown, and House Minority In the 36 hours after Perot's announcement, for Leader Bob Michel. example, our national 800 number logged over 2,000 calls, many from former Perot backers looking for a Many Perot backers had never been active in politics new candidate and possibly a new political home. before this year. To reach these people, the LP will send a prospecting mailing to Perot petition National office staffers were unable to handle regular circulators whose names and addresses we can obtain business as they all took turns soothing distraught from Secretaries of State in those states where Perot callers on our regular phone line and offering them has already turned in petitions. information about the Marrou/Lord ticket. Media coverage for both the Marrou/Lord ticket and LP of Los Angeles County staffer Don Meyer talked the LP has skyrocketed, with appearances on Larry with 75 callers in the first few hours, some of whom King's radio show, as well as C-SPAN's Road to the were "practically in tears." National Chair Mary White House and Viewer Call-In, planned for this Gingell received a call from a local Perot coordinator coming week.
    [Show full text]
  • The Retriever, Issue 7, Volume 39
    8 Opinion October 12, 2004 THE RETRIEVER Point Counterpoint Your ballot: Change or principle? The lesser of two evils is still evil JON BERNHARDT winning. PETER BESSMAN date you consider to be evil, regardless of the fact that Retriever Guest Writer In the real world, it would be nice if voting for Retriever Guest Writer that candidate isn’t as bad as his alternative, you are Ralph Nader would change things. I’m sure that’s still voting for a candidate that you don’t want in It’s a very simple question: when you vote at what he wants you to think. But that’s not what’s Voters disillusioned with the major party candi- office, but merely see as lesser form of evil. The effect the beginning of November, a few weeks from now, going to happen. This is a very important election. dates face an interesting paradox in third-party repre- is that you doom yourself to a perpetually evil leader- are you voting to make a point, or are you voting to We are in the middle of a global war. We cannot sentatives. On one hand, it’s not terribly uncommon ship. To truly vote tactically, you need to consider the make a change? afford to waste our votes. Does it sound like I’m try- to find people agree with a particular third party’s plat- time factor and remember that four years is too short I’ve heard a lot from people around campus ing to scare you back into line? Well, I am.
    [Show full text]
  • In the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio Western Division
    Case 3:04-cv-07724-JGC Document 14-1 Filed 01/27/2005 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION ______________________________ ) ANITA RIOS, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 3:04-CV-7724 ) The Honorable James G. Carr J. KENNETH BLACKWELL, ) ) Defendant. ) ______________________________) PLAINTIFFS’ MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS Plaintiffs, seven of whom voted in Ohio for president of the United States, two of whom were presidential candidates in 2004, and one of which is a non-partisan, non- profit organization in Ohio committed to free and fair elections, respectfully oppose defendant Blackwell’s December 29, 2004 motion to dismiss. Plaintiffs request the Court to defer consideration of such motion until a determination is made whether the recount litigation now pending in the Southern District of Ohio, State Ex. Rel. Yost v. National Voting Rights Institute, Civ. No. C2-04-1139 (ES/TK) (hereinafter “Yost” case), should be transferred to this Court and consolidated with this action. Secretary Blackwell has on at least four occasions suggested in papers filed in the Yost case that the case should be Case 3:04-cv-07724-JGC Document 14-1 Filed 01/27/2005 Page 2 of 10 transferred to this Court and consolidated with this case, which was the first recount case filed.1 Moreover, as plaintiffs establish below, they have standing to pursue their constitutional right to a recount, and the issues raised in their complaint are not moot. In addition, plaintiffs have not abandoned their claims.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Awards Committee Report
    2018 AWARDS COMMITTEE REPORT Submitted to: Libertarian National Committee, Apr. 17, 2018 Submitted by: James W. Lark, III Region 5 Representative, Libertarian National Committee Member, 2018 Awards Committee The members of the 2018 Awards Committee are Tim Hagan, Daniel Hayes, and Jim Lark; these members were elected by the LNC during the December 2017 meeting. It is likely two additional members will be elected during the upcoming LNC meeting in Denver. An article soliciting nominations for the 2018 awards appeared on LP.org on Mar. 30; the article is available at www.lp.org/call-nominations-2018-libertarian-party-awards/. A similar article will appear in the next issue of LP News. In addition, solicitations for nominations will be sent to the LP e-mail list; such a solicitation was sent on Apr. 12. Submissions should be sent to [email protected]. The deadline for submissions is 5:00 p.m. EDT on May 31. Please note that the committee has already received several nominations. Two awards ceremonies are scheduled to take place during the LP national convention. At this moment we are uncertain of the dates and times for the ceremonies. APPENDIX: Libertarian Party national award recipients and Hall of Liberty members 1996: Samuel Adams Award: Don Ernsberger Thomas Paine Award: Jacob Hornberger Thomas Jefferson Award: David Nolan 1998: Samuel Adams Award: Steve Dasbach Thomas Paine Award: Harry Browne Thomas Jefferson Award: David Bergland 2000: Samuel Adams Award: Richard Rider Thomas Paine Award: Michael Cloud Thomas Jefferson Award: Ed Clark
    [Show full text]
  • The BG News October 27, 2004
    Bowling Green State University ScholarWorks@BGSU BG News (Student Newspaper) University Publications 10-27-2004 The BG News October 27, 2004 Bowling Green State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/bg-news Recommended Citation Bowling Green State University, "The BG News October 27, 2004" (2004). BG News (Student Newspaper). 7343. https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/bg-news/7343 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University Publications at ScholarWorks@BGSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in BG News (Student Newspaper) by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@BGSU. State University WEDNESDAY October 27, 2004 NOT NEWS: Who is the better choice: Matt or PM SHOWERS HIGH 60 LOW: 44 Josh? Read our humor columns and decide; www.bgnews.com PAGE 5 dependent student press VOLUME 99 ISSUE 55 UAO hosts debate between parties Laura Collins question. During the course that and let their voices be heard. REPORTER of the debate, the crowd, made During the debate, the College it all started when UAO decid- up of mostly college students, Republicans said that the ed ID show 'Fahrenheit 9/11' a cheered, booed, applauded and Democrats arc running more of a week before the elections," said laughed. They were also asked to blame Bush first campaign, rath- David Scharfeld, a member of the settle down a few times by UAO er dian actually coming up with College Republicans. moderator, Bernard little, whose solutions themselves. They said UAO organized a debate joking comments seemed to ease Democrats are trying to scare between the College Democrats the tension in die room, at times.
    [Show full text]
  • Advisory Opinion 2004-34
    FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION Washington, DC 20463 December 2, 2004 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED ADVISORY OPINION 2004-40 Joseph J. Miller, Jr. Treasurer Libertarian Party of Maryland 211 Coronet Drive Linthicum Heights, MD 21090-1706 Dear Mr. Miller, We are responding to your inquiry regarding the status of the Libertarian Party of Maryland (the “Party”) as a State party committee of a political party under the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended (the “Act”), and Commission regulations. In this opinion, the Commission concludes that the Party qualifies as a State party committee because (1) the Party is a political party that is affiliated with the national committee of the Libertarian Party, (2) is responsible for the day-to-day operation of the Libertarian Party at the State level, and (3) is part of the official Libertarian Party structure. Background The facts of this request are presented in letters dated September 27 and October 18 and 22, 2004. The Party’s constitution (the “Party Constitution”) details various aspects of the organization of the Party. It illustrates how the Party, through the State Central Committee and the Local Central Committee in each county, engages in various activities in Maryland, including: creating a yearly plan of action to promote the Party in Maryland, communicating regularly with its members, nominating candidates for State and local AO 2004-40 Page 2 public offices, supporting the election of the Party’s candidates, and engaging in educational social, and fundraising activities to advance the Party’s goals.1 The Party has provided printouts from the Maryland State Board of Elections website that show that the Party placed candidates for Federal office on the Maryland ballot for the 1988, 1992, 1996, and 2000 Presidential elections.
    [Show full text]