1 18-Gtrbr-05 Motorcycle Brake Systems

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1 18-Gtrbr-05 Motorcycle Brake Systems 18-GTRBR-05 MOTORCYCLE BRAKE SYSTEMS gtr - TECHNICAL REPORT - 1. Introduction During the 58th session of the Working Party on Brakes and Running Gear (GRRF), a formal proposal for a global technical regulation (gtr) concerning Motorcycle Brake Systems was presented, along with the accompanying “Statement of Technical Rationale and Justification”. This Technical Report serves to provide additional detail regarding the technical rationale for the respective requirements within the proposed gtr. 2. General The proposed gtr on Motorcycle Brake Systems consists of a compilation of the most stringent and relevant tests procedures and performance requirements from current standards and regulations. The informal group reviewed the existing requirements on various levels, including estimating the relative severity of the requirements as well as considering the original rationales and appropriateness of the tests to modern conditions and technologies. As a result of the comparison process, the selected performance requirements within the gtr are mainly developed from the UN/ECE Regulation No. 78 (ECE), the United States Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard FMVSS 122 (FMVSS) and the Japanese Safety Standard JSS 12-61 (JSS). The selected format for the gtr text is based on the Alternative format for regulations with many different requirements and test procedures, as described in TRANS/WP.29/883, and was chosen to facilitate quick reference and understanding of the requirements. While developing the gtr, the informal group endeavoured to clarify discrepancies in the referenced tests, to assure a better understanding and the consistency in the way the respective tests are conducted. The gtr is comprised of several fundamental tests, each with their respective performance requirements. These tests are listed below, along with the national regulation on which they are based: 1. dry stop test with each brake control operated separately (ECE R78 / JSS 12-61) 2. dry stop test with all brake controls activated simultaneously (FMVSS 122) 3. high speed test (JSS 12-61) 4. wet brake test (ECE R78 / JSS 12-61) 5. heat fade test (ECE R78 / JSS 12-61) 6. parking brake test (ECE R78 / JSS 12-61) 7. ABS tests (ECE R78 / JSS 12-61) 8. partial failure test – split service brake systems (FMVSS 122) 9. servo failure test (New) 1 2.1 gtr Test Parameters To maintain the integrity of the referenced test, the parameters selected for each performance test are almost entirely as specified in the respective national regulation on which the test was based. Although the national regulations share many similarities, there are several differences in the terminology and their definitions. The informal group sought to streamline the gtr with the use of common terminology and definitions. Whenever possible, these were obtained from the document Special Resolution No. 1 (S.R.1) concerning the common definitions of vehicle categories, masses and dimensions. Alternately, terminology and definitions were adopted from recognized sources such as the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) and others. Terminology borrowed from S.R.1 includes “mass in running order” and “gross vehicle mass”. Mass in running order is defined as the sum of the unladen vehicle mass and the driver’s mass, which are further defined in S.R.1. Gross vehicle mass is the maximum mass of the fully laden vehicle as declared by the manufacturer. Definitions for existing terminology were revised or updated where necessary, such as for antilock brake system (ABS), vehicle maximum speed (Vmax) and peak friction coefficient (PFC). New terminology was also introduced when required. One such example deals with defining the motorcycle test mass: In this case, the terminology “lightly-loaded vehicle” (FMVSS 122), “unladen vehicle” (ECE R78) and “unloaded” (JSS 12-61) essentially share the same meaning, which is the sum of the “mass in running order” and all of the test equipment, including outriggers, if so equipped. In an effort to streamline the gtr, the Contracting Parties agreed to the term “lightly-loaded vehicle mass”, as this does not conflict with existing definitions in S.R.1, nor other recognized sources. 2.2 Measurement of Deceleration and Stopping Distance The ECE and JSS test methods allow brake performance to be measured through the use of either deceleration or stopping distance, whereas the FMVSS evaluates performance through stopping distance only. The ECE and JSS measure deceleration slightly differently. The ECE utilizes the mean fully developed deceleration (MFDD), which is the vehicle deceleration calculated between 10 and 80 percent of the vehicle initial speed. The JSS uses the vehicle mean saturated deceleration (MSD), which can be obtained several ways depending on the instrumentation employed. Both methods measure a steady state deceleration rate, by excluding the transient period during the initial stage of the brake application and the very end of the braking maneuver. Nevertheless, the different methods can provide slightly different results. In order to maintain consistency in the results, the MFDD was adopted to measure braking deceleration performance, where required. The FMVSS stopping distance is based on an average deceleration rate for the entire stopping maneuver, from the moment a force is applied to the brake control to the moment the vehicle comes to a complete stop. The ECE and JSS stopping distance are based on the MFDD (or MSD) and also account for a system reaction time. 2 To maintain the integrity of the referenced test, the performance requirements are almost entirely as specified in the respective national regulation on which the test was based. 2.3 Corrected Measured Distance Deceleration or stopping distance performance requirements are related to a specific initial test speed. While professional test riders can approach this initial test speed, it is unlikely that the test will be started at the exact speed specified. A braking distance correction factor is specified in JSS 12-61 to compensate for the difference between the specified test speed and the actual speed where the brakes were applied. Although not specified in the regulations, the USA and Canada utilise the correction factor specified in SAE J299 – Stopping Distance Test Procedure. Each method was evaluated, including the distance correction factor for motorcycle brake testing found in ISO 8710:1995, Motorcycles – Brakes and braking devices - tests and measurement methods. The SAE offers the most basic method for estimating the corrected distance, and as a result the method is applicable to a speed tolerance of ± 3.2 km/h (± 2 mph). The ISO and JSS methods are based on the same principles, but also take into consideration the system reaction time. These methods are applicable to a wider speed tolerance of ± 5 km/h. However, a small error in handling the system reaction time is apparent in the ISO equation, which results in higher than expected corrected values. Based on this analysis, the informal group agreed that the correction factor equation within JSS 12-61 was the most appropriate for the gtr. 2.4 Test Surface – Peak Friction Coefficient Peak Friction Coefficient (PFC) is a measure of the coefficient of friction of the test surface and is an important parameter for assessing brake performance of a vehicle. FMVSS 122 currently requires that the road tests be conducted on an 8-foot-wide level roadway with a skid number of 81. The road test surface conditions specified do not apply to the burnish procedure. For parking brake tests, the test surface is clean, dry, smooth Portland concrete cement. ECE R78 and JSS 12-61 do not specify the coefficient of friction for the test surface but describe the test surface as level, dry, and affording good adhesion. Test lane width is also specified as 2.5 m (8 feet). ECE R78 and JSS 12-61 rely on a subjective description of the test surface coefficient of friction. Under the self-certification system currently used by Contracting Parties such as the United States and Canada, the test surface is defined, objectively, to reduce variability of the results when testing motorcycle brake systems for compliance to their national standard. Given that the test surface coefficient of friction affects the attainable braking performance limit of a vehicle, specifying a value in the gtr will prevent unreasonable variability in the test results, which may be due to test surface variability and not due to the motorcycle’s actual braking ability. The Contracting Parties agreed to define the test surface using PFC instead of skid number as currently specified in FMVSS 122. The PFC is a measure of tire-to-road surface friction based on the maximum deceleration of a rolling tire whereas skid number is a measure of 3 the tire-to-road surface friction based on a skidding tire. Therefore, PFC is a more relevant surface friction measurement for non-locked-wheel tests, as those included in this gtr. The Contracting Parties agreed that specifying a test surface with a nominal PFC 0.9 is an appropriate and objective value for the dry test surface for the motorcycle braking tests. The United States Federal motor vehicle safety standards that currently use PFC specify that the road test surface must have a PFC of 0.9 when measured using American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) E1136 standard reference test tire, in accordance with ASTM Method E1337-90, at a speed of 40 mph without water delivery. However, since the ASTM test method is not widely used outside of North America and there is no common test method used in Europe or Japan, the Contracting Parties agreed to specify the PFC for the test surface but to leave it to the national regulation to determine the test method that should be used to measure the PFC. 2.5 Test Sequence There is no specified test order in the ECE R78.
Recommended publications
  • Development of Plug-In Air Powered Four Wheels Motorcycle Drivetrain Control Unit
    DEVELOPMENT OF PLUG-IN AIR POWERED FOUR WHEELS MOTORCYCLE DRIVETRAIN CONTROL UNIT TAN BENG LENG Report submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for award of the Degree of Bachelor of Mechanical Engineering with Automotive Engineering Faculty of Mechanical Engineering UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA PAHANG JUNE 2013 v ABSTRACT This thesis is related to the development of plug-in air powered four wheel motorcycles drive train system that transfers rotational energy from power train to the driving wheel. The objective of this thesis is to develop an air hybrid drivetrain unit and control the power and torque from the powertrain to the driving wheel by using sequential manual transmission. This thesis describes the process of developing sequential shift-by-wire system to make gear shifting for easier for 4 wheel motorcycle. The controller used in this project was 18F PIC 4550 microprocessor. The system programming performed using FLOWCODE version 4.0. 2 units of electromechanical linear actuator were used in this project as an actuator for gear shifting on a manual transmission. Chain drives were selected as power transfer linkage from air hybrid engine to the driving wheel with under drive configuration. Besides the development of shift-by-wire system, the torque on the driving wheel also had been calculated and analysed. In additional, the maximum speed that can be achieved by four wheel motorcycles was also calculated. vi ABSTRAK Tesis ni berkaitan dengan pembangunan sistem pacuan yang memindahkan tenaga putaran ke roda pacuan untuk “plug-in hybrid air powered” motosikal empat roda. Objectif tesis ini ialah untuk membangunkan pacaun “ air hybrid” and mengawal kuasa and tork daripada janakuasa kepada roda paduan mengunakan transmisi manual berturutan.
    [Show full text]
  • ATV/OFMC Regulations
    ATV/OFMC Regulations ATV/OFMC Workshop July 21, 2004 Linc Wehrly Off-Highway Motorcycle (OFMC) Standards Table 1 of §1051.105 – Exhaust Emission Standards for Off-Highway Motorcycles (g/km) Model Year Phase-in Emission Standards Maximum allowable family (percent) emission limits HC+NOx CO HC+NOx CO 2006 50 2.0 25 20 50 2007 and 100 2.0 25 20 50 later • Averaging, banking and trading for HC+NOx and CO • Competition exemption (§1051.620) • Minimum useful life of 10,000 km or 5years Alternative OFMC Standards Alternative Exhaust Emission Standards for Off-Highway Motorcycles (g/km) Model Year Phase-in Emission Standards (percent) HC+NOx CO 2007 100 4.0 35 • No competition exemption • At least 10% of models must have four of the following: –Absence of headlight or other lights – Absence of spark arrester – Absence of a manufacturer warranty – Suspension travel greater than 10 inches – Engine displacement greater than 50 cc – Absence of a functional seat • Averaging and banking for HC+NOx only – No trading OFMC Less Than 70 cc Emission Standards • OFMC with engines less than 70 cc have option to certify to engine-based exhaust standards (§1051.615) Exhaust Emission Standards for Off-Highway Motorcycles Less Than 70 cc (g/kW-hr) Model Year Phase-in Emission Standards Maximum allowable family (percent) emission limits HC+NOx CO HC+NOx CO 2006 50 16.1 519 32.2 -- 2007 and 100 16.1 519 32.2 -- later • Averaging, banking and trading for HC+NOx only • Minimum useful life of 5,000 km or 5 years • Engine-based test cycle – 6 Mode Duty Cycle for Recreational
    [Show full text]
  • KAWASAKI MOTORCYCLE HISTORY 1952—2014 * This Pamphlet Contains a Selection of Key Models Throughout Kawasaki’S History
    KAWASAKI MOTORCYCLE HISTORY 1952—2014 * This pamphlet contains a selection of key models throughout Kawasaki’s history. It is not intended to be a complete compilation. * Model years and release dates may vary by market. 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 P/N 99941-1454 ALL-E Printed in Japan. 14-II Overseas sales of the Z1 (900 cm3) start. 3 3 3 Kawasaki A factory dedicated exclusively to The Z1100GP is released. The first model in the supersport GP line-up Sales of the Vulcan 750, Kawasaki’s first V-Twin American-style Cruiser, Sales of the new Kawasaki flagship model, the ZZ-R1100 (Ninja Ninja ZX-9R Overseas sales of the Overseas sales of the Ninja ZX-12R (1200 cm ) commence. KX250F Sales of the KX250F, Z1000 Like its predecessor, the new KLX450R The KLX450R Z1000 With the introduction of the The Ninja 1000 (Z1000SX The Ninja ZX-14R (ZZR1400 ABS in Europe) arrives. The new Ninja ZX-10R (1000 cm ) is introduced. Complementing its Z250 With the Z250, Kawasaki A head-turning new Z1000 debuts. KSR PRO The KSR PRO (110 cm ) is added Kawasaki Legends 1952 1960 125 New Ace motorcycle production is 1972 Sales of a domestic version, the Z2 (750 cm3), start the 1980 features Fuel Injection and an oil cooler. 1985 commence. 1990 ZX-11 in N. America), commence. 1994 Ninja ZX-9R (900 cm3) 2000 2004 Kawasaki’s first 4-stroke 2007 Z1000 takes the performance 2008 makes its debut. 2010 new Z1000, Kawasaki takes 2011 in Europe), a bike that 2012 2013 already high base performance, it is equipped with a new electronic 2013 brings the wild excitement 2014 2014 to the KSR mini-motard line-up.
    [Show full text]
  • 302S Owner's Manual
    TnT302S OWNER’S MANUAL CONTENTS 256778 CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... Important Reminder ....................................................................................................................................................................................... Preface .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Safety Notes ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ Safe Driving Rules ....................................................................................................................................................................................... Protective Riding Gear .............................................................................................................................................................................. VIN Number & Engine Number ................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Location of Parts ..............................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Motorcycle Safety and Intelligent Transportation Systems Gap Analysis Final Report
    Motorcycle Safety and Intelligent Transportation Systems Gap Analysis Final Report www.its.dot.gov/index.htm Final Report — October 2018 FHWA-JPO-18-700 Cover Photo Source: iStockphoto.com Notice This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. The U.S. Government is not endorsing any manufacturers, products, or services cited herein and any trade name that may appear in the work has been included only because it is essential to the contents of the work. Technical Report Documentation Page 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA-JPO-18-700 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Motorcycle Safety and Intelligent Transportation Systems Gap Analysis, Final Report October 2018 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Erin Flanigan, Katherine Blizzard, Aldo Tudela Rivadeneyra, Robert Campbell 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 3 Bethesda Metro Center, Suite 1200 Bethesda, MD 20814 11. Contract or Grant No. DTFH61-12-D-00042 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered U.S. Department of Transportation Final Report, August 2014 to April 2017 FHWA Office of Operations (FHWA HOP) 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 14. Sponsoring Agency Code FHWA HOP 15. Supplementary Notes Government Task Manager: Jeremy Gunderson, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 16. Abstract Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) present an array of promising ways to improve motorcycle safety.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Safety for Motorcycle, Scooter and Moped Riders Motorcycle, for Scootermoped and Improving Safety Improving Safety for Motorcycle, Scooter and Moped Riders
    Improving SafetyImproving and forScooter Moped Motorcycle, Riders Improving Safety for Motorcycle, Scooter and Moped Riders The global fleet of powered two-wheelers (PTWs) is constantly increasing. In many countries, motorcycles, scooters and mopeds play a significant role in mobility, particularly in many of the world’s large cities. As such, PTWs are becoming an important component of the transport system. However, they represent an important challenge for road safety. PTW riders are at far more risk than car drivers per kilometre ridden in terms of fatalities and severe injuries entailing long-term disability. Moreover, they have not benefited from safety improvements at the same pace as car occupants over recent decades. Addressing the issue of PTW safety is thus an essential contribution to the success of the United Nations’ Decade of Action for Road Safety, which aims at halving the expected number of road deaths worldwide by 2020. This report reviews recent trends in powered two-wheeler crashes, the factors contributing to these crashes and their severity. It describes a set of countermeasures targeting user behaviours, the use of protective equipment, the vehicles and the infrastructure. Finally, it discusses motorcycle safety strategies in the context of a safe system. Improving Safety for Motorcycle, Scooter and Moped Riders Research Report Research Report International Transport Forum 2 rue André Pascal 75775 Paris Cedex 16 France T +33 (0)1 45 24 97 10 F +33 (0)1 45 24 13 22 Email : [email protected] (75 2015 021 P1) Web: www.internationaltransportforum.org ISBN 978-92-821-0793-5 2015-09 /Photo credit: Roberto gettyimages Muñoz, 2015 2015-09-02_PTW 21x28_speen11.5.indd 1 02/09/2015 16:55:25 Improving Safety for Motorcycle, Scooter and Moped Riders Research Report This work is published under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 CTX700N/NA/ND Owner's Manual
    14 CTX700N-31MJF6000.book 4 ページ 2013年1月30日 水曜日 午後3時1分 Contents Motorcycle Safety P. 2 Operation Guide P. 16 Maintenance P. 47 Troubleshooting P. 99 Information P. 120 Specifications P. 141 Index P. 145 Welcome Congratulations on your purchase of a new When service is required, remember that Honda motorcycle. Your selection of a your Honda dealer knows your motorcycle Honda makes you part of a worldwide family best. If you have the required mechanical of satisfied customers who appreciate “know-how” and tools, you can purchase an Honda’s reputation for building quality into official Honda Service Manual to help you every product. perform many maintenance and repair tasks. 2 P. 136 To ensure your safety and riding pleasure: Read the warranty information thoroughly so ● Read this owner’s manual carefully. that you understand the warranty coverage ● Follow all recommendations and and that you are aware of your rights and procedures contained in this manual. responsibilities. 2 P. 137 ● Pay close attention to safety messages contained in this manual and on the You may also want to visit our website at motorcycle. www.powersports.honda.com. Canada www.honda.ca. To protect your investment, we urge you to Happy riding! take responsibility for keeping your California Proposition 65 Warning motorcycle well serviced and maintained. WARNING: This product contains or emits Also, observe the break-in guidelines, and chemicals known to the State of California to always perform the pre-ride inspection and cause cancer and birth defects or other other periodic checks in this manual. reproductive harm. A Few Words About Safety Your safety, and the safety of others, is very important.
    [Show full text]
  • This Manual Should Be Considered a Permanent Part of the Motorcycle and Should Remain with the Motorcycle When It Is Resold
    20180726215216_32K0GC000_eng_BOOK Page 1 Thursday, July 26 2018 21:57:26 JST This manual should be considered a permanent part of the motorcycle and should remain with the motorcycle when it is resold. This publication includes the latest production information available before printing. Honda Motor Co., Ltd. reserves the right to make changes at any time without notice and without incurring any obligation. No part of this publication may be reproduced without written permission. The vehicle pictured in this owner’s manual may not match your actual vehicle. © 2018 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. 20180726215216_32K0GC000_eng_BOOK Page 2 Thursday, July 26 2018 21:57:26 JST Welcome Congratulations on your purchase of a new ● The following codes in this manual Honda motorcycle. Your selection of a indicate each country. Honda makes you part of a worldwide family ● The illustrations here in are based on the of satisfied customers who appreciate C125A ED type. Honda's reputation for building quality into Country Codes every product. Code Country C125A To ensure your safety and riding pleasure: ED European direct sales ● Read this owner's manual carefully. E UK ● Follow all recommendations and U Australia procedures contained in this manual. *The specifications may vary with each locale. ● Pay close attention to safety messages contained in this manual and on the motorcycle. 20180726215216_32K0GC000_eng_BOOK Page 3 Thursday, July 26 2018 21:57:26 JST A Few Words About Safety Your safety, and the safety of others, is very 3DANGER important. Operating this motorcycle safely is an important responsibility. You WILL be KILLED or SERIOUSLY To help you make informed decisions about HURT if you don’t follow instructions.
    [Show full text]
  • Gearbox Evolution (Also See Part VII: Neutral Indicating Switch Evolution)
    Ural (Урал) - Dnepr (Днепр) Russian Motorcycle Part XXXII: Gearbox Evolution (Also See Part VII: Neutral Indicating Switch Evolution) Ernie Franke [email protected] 4 / 2020 Russian Ural (Урал) - Dnepr (Днепр) Motorcycle Gearbox Review • Part XXXII: Gearbox Evolution • Part XXXII-1: How the Gearbox Works (Expanded step-by-step work of Bill Glaser) • Part XXXII-2A: BMW (Bayerische Motoren Werke) R71 Gearbox (Father of Russian M-72) • Part XXXII-2B: ZiS (Zavod imeni Stalina) and 7204 Gearbox (Initial and later M-72) • Part XXXII-2C: K-750 (K-750, K-750B and K-750M) Gearbox • Part XXXII-2D: M-72 M and M-72N Gearbox (Ural and Dnepr Production) • Part XXXII-3: 6204 Gearbox (M-62 thru M-67) • Part XXXII-4: 7500 Gearbox (Updated 6204 gearboxes for K-750B / K-750M / MB-750 / MB-750M) • Part XXXII-5: MT804 Gearbox (Dnepr MT-9 thru MT-11/16) • Part XXXII-6: Ural M-67.36 and 650 (IMZ-8.103) Gearbox • Part XXXII-7: Ural 750 Gearbox (Current Ural models) • Part XXXII-8: Optional Gear Ratios (Higher 1st gear, lower 3rd and 4th gear, 5th gear overdrive) • Part XXXII-9: Shifting Gears (Shifting and Adjusting Gearbox) The Russian sidecar motorcycle gearbox is examined over the last seventy years.2 Outline for Dnepr / Ural Gearbox Evolution • History of Dnepr / Ural Gearboxes Divided into Four Main Groups: o BMW R71 / M-72 ZiS / Dnepr / Ural • Five Distinctive Types of Gearboxes: o BMW R71 / M-72 ZiS and M-72 7204 gearboxes: Two gear-change levers - manual (right) and foot (left). o 6204: 4-speed with gear-shifting by movable couplings with internal teeth Cam clutches on secondary (output) shaft replaced with splined one.
    [Show full text]
  • Part XXII: Fire Engines
    Russian Motorcycle Part XXII: Fire Engines Ernie Franke [email protected] June 2014 Advent and Demise of the Fire-Fighting Motorcycle •What Was Needed in Rural Russia for Fire-Fighting? –Fire-Fighting Motorcycles As a Rapid Response Concept –Inexpensive Alternative to Large Fire Engines –Easy to Start in the Cold Winter –Characteristics of Villages and Provincial Towns: Houses Made of Wood •Fire-Fighting Motorcycle Meets Those Needs –Quick Response •Most Effective in Rural Areas, Where Fire Engine May Take 2-3 hours •Rushed to Site of the Fire, the Driver and a Fighter Respond Fast to Extinguish the Source of the Fire •Travel Along Poorly-Maintained Roads and Fit Thru Narrow Gates •If Bogged-Down; Use a Horse to Pull Out –Inexpensive Fire-Fighting System •Motorcycles with Fire-Fighting Equipment •Sidecar Houses Fire Pump and Hose –Quick Access to Water •Intake Hose Tossed into Ditch, Pond or Well •Fire-Fighters Motorcycles Were in Almost Every Village –One Machine Is Able to Serve a Holiday Village •Today’s Roads and Accesses Have Improved, Towns Have Grown Larger and Property Is More Expensive –Changes in Rural Russia Now Call for Larger Equipment Fire-fighting motorcycles have a definite niche in Russia history. 2 Russian Motorcycle Fire Engine Agenda •Motorcycle A-600 (Мотоцикл Л-600) –First Soviet Fire-Fighter Motorcycle: 1932 –Named "Prometheus“, after the Factory •Dnepr (KMZ) Fire-Fighter Motorcycle (Пожарный мотоцикл) –Dnepr-156P • Octopus-1 (СПРУТ-1) • Octopus-2 (СПРУТ-2) • MP-800 Motor Pump –Dnepr (Днепр)-157P • MT-16 Motorcycle • MP-1600 Motor pump •Izhevsk (IZH) –Iz Freight Cargo 6.920 •Ural (Урал - IMZ) –Cargo “Box” Offers Convenient Fire-Fighting Package –Motor-Cross Versions Capable of Conversion to Fire-Fighting –Hercules IMZ-8.4013 Tricycle Capable of Handling Large Loads •Future Motorcycle Fire-Fighters As the Russian motorcycle evolved, so did the conversions to fire-fighting variations.
    [Show full text]
  • Owner's Manual
    This manual should be considered a permanent part of the motorcycle and should remain with the motorcycle when it is resold. This publication includes the latest production information available before printing. Honda Motor Co., Ltd. reserves the right to make changes at any time without notice and without incurring any obligation. No part of this publication may be reproduced without written permission. The vehicle pictured in this owner’s manual may not match your actual vehicle. © 2015 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. Welcome Congratulations on your purchase of a new ● The following codes in this manual indicate Honda motorcycle. Your selection of a Honda the country. makes you part of a worldwide family of ● The illustrations here in are based on the satisfied customers who appreciate Honda’s CB125 II KE type. reputation for building quality into every Country Codes product. Code Country CB125 To ensure your safety and riding pleasure: KE, II KE, III KE Kenya ● Read this owner’s manual carefully. ● Follow all recommendations and procedures contained in this manual. ● Pay close attention to safety messages contained in this manual and on the motorcycle. A Few Words About Safety Your safety, and the safety of others, is very important. Operating this motorcycle safely is 3DANGER an important responsibility. You WILL be KILLED or SERIOUSLY To help you make informed decisions about HURT if you don’t follow instructions. safety, we have provided operating procedures and other information on safety labels and in 3WARNING this manual. This information alerts you to You CAN be KILLED or SERIOUSLY potential hazards that could hurt you or others.
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL DESIGN and IMPLEMENTATION PLAN for EVALUATING the EFFECTIVENESS of FMSS 122: MOTORCYCLE BRAKE SYSTEMS Kayla Costenoble Stephen J
    DOT HS- 803 381 FINAL DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF FMSS 122: MOTORCYCLE BRAKE SYSTEMS Kayla Costenoble Stephen J. Thoren Gaylord M. Northrop The Center for the Environment and Man, Inc. 275 Windsor Street Hartford, Connecticut 06120 Contract No. DOT HS-7-01674 Contract Amt. $93,262 DECEMBER 1977 FINAL REPORT This document is available to the U.S. public through the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161 Prepared For U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Washington, D.C. 20590 This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Govern- ment assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. NOTICE The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers1 names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the object of this report. Technical Report Documentation Pag* 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient'• Catalog No. DOT HS-803 391 4. till* and Subtitle S. Report Oat* December 1977 FINAL DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF FMVSS 122: 6. Performing Organization Code MOTORCYCLE BRAKE SYSTEMS 8. Performing Organization Report No. 7 Author'*) Kayla Costenoble, Stephen Thoren, Gaylord Northrop 4228-590 9. Performing Oreaniiation Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRA)S) THE CENTER FOR THE ENVIRONMENT AND MAN,, INC. 11. Controct or Gront No. 275 Windsor Street DOT-HS-7-01674 Hartford, Connecticut 06120 13. Type 6f Report and Period Covered 12. Sponsoring Agency Nam* and Address U.S.
    [Show full text]