DOCSLIB.ORG

Culture Is Not What It Used to Be: the Transformation of Anglo-American Cultural Geography Don Mitchell

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Culture Is Not What It Used to Be: the Transformation of Anglo-American Cultural Geography Don Mitchell 人 文 地 理 第53巻 第1号 (2001) Culture Is Not What It Used To Be: The Transformation of Anglo-American Cultural Geography Don Mitchell* English-language cultural geography is not what it used to be. It's not what it was in 1989 (when the Berlin Wall came down, students took over Tiananmen Square and were repressed, and Peter Jackson published Maps of Meaning:An Introductionto Cultural Geography).1) It is certainly not what it was in 1973 (when America was engulfed in Watergate, activists from the American Indian Movement occupied Wounded Knee, South Dakota, the U.S. was still fighting in Vietnam, and 2) Wilbur Zelinsky published The Cultural Geographyof the United States): And it is not the same as it was in 1962 (when John F. Kennedy was president, the Beatles had not yet invaded America, American hegemony was ascendant, and Wagner and Mikesell published Readings in Cultural 3) Geography).The field is far more diverse, more complex, more decidedly political, and more theoretically sophisticated than ever. And yet there is a certain continuity that runs from the codification of "Berkeley-school" cultural geography by Wagner and Mikesell in 1962, the exuberant focus on nationalist identity that motivated Zelinsky in 1973, the multicultural, antiracist, politically leftist "new cultural geography" that Jackson did so much to define in 1989, and the current era of Anglo-American geography in which no single paradigm dominates, but in which all the best work is geared to understanding the relationship, at all scales, between cultural difference and cultural sameness. The purpose of this essay is to show how the range of work now being conducted within English-language cultural geography has developed from within- and moved well beyond -its Berkeley-school roots, and to suggest some areas in which it has fallen short, both theoretically and politically, from becoming the truly critical mode of geographical knowledge that it could be. The * Don Mitchell is Associate Professor and Graduate Director in the Department of Geography, Syracuse University (144 Eggers Hall, Syracuse, NY, 13244,USA). He is the author of Cultural Geography: A Critical Introduction (Blackwell, 2000) and The Lie of the Land: Migrant Workers and the California Landscape (University of Minnesota Press, 1996), as well as dozens of articles and essays on labor and landscapes, public space and homelessness, and cultural theory. In 1998, he was awarded a five-year MacArthur Fellowship, only the third ever to be awarded to a geographer. With this Fellowship he founded and is the Director of the People's Geography Project, which is working to popularize radical geography in the United States (details at www.peoplesgeography.org). 1) Jackson, P., Maps of meaning: an introduction to cultural geography, Unwin Hyman, 1989. 2) Zelinsky, W., The cultural geography of the United States, Prentice Hall, 1973. 3) Wagner, P. and Mikesell, M. (eds.), Readings in cultural geography, University of Chicago Press, 1962. -36- Culture Is Not What It Used To Be (Mitchell) 37 following will be a partisan and therefore partial account. I have a real stake in the debates and theoretical developments I will explore below: I am a proponent of a particular view in cultural geography, a view that could perhaps be summarized as materialist, Marxist, and to some degree "economistic" in orientation. For me the place to look for culture is in the political -economy, in the world of commodity production. I do not see culture as an autonomous realm or sphere of meaning or signification, nor as an automatic site of "resistance" (two predominate contemporary ways of understanding culture). Indeed, I see much "culture" as repressive and oppressive, inextricably bound up in the reproduction of capitalism, and a form of political co-optation. But I get ahead of myself. We will get to these issues soon enough. I raise them here only as a warning. Do not take this article as an impartial account of Anglo-American cultural geography. I think it is an accurate account, but it is anything but an impartial one. I New Cultural Geography-and Old 1989 was a remarkable year. The world quite literally changed. The Cold War came to a spasmodic stop; capitalism seemed to reign triumphant; forces of nationalist frenzy were unleashed; and millions upon millions of people saw their lives turned topsy-turvy. Even the repression in Tiananmen turned out to be a necessary prelude to the fuller introduction of the 4) market into China, and hence to a quite remarkable and unsettling reorientation of Chinese culture. Peter Jackson's important codification of "new cultural geography," Maps of Meaning, was launched, that is to say, at a propitious moment. Just at the moment when we could nor longer take the sureties of the bi-polar Cold War world for granted, Jackson helped geographers see how they had never been sureties in the first place-that the meaning of the worlds we lived in was not only socially constructed, but continually contested, and that it had never really been bi-polar anyway, but rather multi-polar. Nor could we any longer afford the fantasy that culture was somehow a realm apart from the messy world of politics and economy.There was a complex politics to culture, Jackson showed, and that politics was ineluctably geographic. The very focus of cultural geography 5) was radically reoriented. It is true that Maps of Meaning did not single-handedly affect this reorientation in cultural geography-that reorientation was quite complex-but it did effectively name, describe, and provide an agenda for a radically new kind of cultural geography, a kind of cultural geography well-suited to the post-Cold War world. To begin with, Jackson asked us to think much more clearly than we, as geographers, had previously done about just what culture is. Indeed, for many in cultural geography, particularly American cultural geography, the question of what culture is was not a question that geographers needed to ask. That was a task of others- anthropologists, 4) See, for example, (1) Zha, J., China pop: how soap operas, tabloids, and bestsellers are transforming a culture, New York: New Press, 1995. (2) Oakes, T., 1999, "China's market reforms: whose human rights problem?" (Weston, T. and Jensen, L. (eds.), China beyond the headlines, Rowman and Littlefield, 2000) pp. 295-326. 5) Jackson, op.cit., footnote 1). -37- 38 人 文 地 理 第53巻 第1号 (2001) 6) historians, philosophers, and the like. The task for American cultural geographers was to map and explain the geographical patterns of culture. At the height of "old" cultural geography, it was simply taken for granted that geographers were not much interested in the "inner workings of culture" as Wagner and Mikesell put it in the introduction to their famous collection, Readings in 7) Cultural Geography. Geographers applied already-theorized (or not-at-all theorized) culture to the landscape, region, or place. If there was an over-riding conceptualization of culture at work in geography, then it was the anthropological one of a "total way of life of a people," and the assumption was that differences between these total ways of life could be mapped. The way to map culture was to focus on particular traits or material artifacts. By mapping specific building styles, uses of language, religious beliefs, or use of particular tools, geographers could say something about not only cultural patterns, but also cultural change. Contact zones between cultures could be identified; even more importantly, the origin and diffusion of specific traits, and eventually perhaps whole cultures, could be traced. While this work has often been derided as "barn type and fence post geography" (because much of it seemed to focus on rural material cultural practices as they could be identified in particular landscape items), it was both far more complex and more important than such derision allows, especially if we understand it within the context of its times-a time marked by a quite vibrant technological triumphalism (despite Hiroshima and Nagasaki). Let me explain. "Old" Anglo -American cultural geography is, of course, most closely associated with Carl Sauer and his students (of which Wagner and Mikesell were two). Sauer's own approach to cultural geography was deeply historical. He was as concerned with the origins of particular practices, and with their subsequent development and spread, as he was with mapping either the historical or contemporary patterns. That is to say, he was interested in processes, not just patterns. Patterns- maps-were a lens on process; they were a form of organizing evidence, not necessarily an end in themselves. This concern with cultural process can be traced right back to Sauer's first methodological broadside, "The Morphology of Landscape," but is especially apparent in his two responses to Hartshorne's apology for a sterile and stultifying regional geography, "Foreword to 8) Historical Geography" and "The Education of a Geographer." In these two polemics, Sauer urged geographers to search not just for roots, but particularly for the roots of the modern, technological 6) It can be argued that before the early 1980s"cultural geography" was almost entirely an American affair, at least among English-speakinggeographers. Britain did not possess the same cultural tradition in geography as did Americans whose work was so heavily influenced by Carl Sauer. The transformation of cultural geography-the development of what gets called "new cultural geography"-was centered in Britain, at least in its early years (though the work in Canada and the United States of scholars such as James Duncan and David Ley, was of course important). Without a sedimented "tradition" of cultural geography upon which to draw (and by which to be hampered), British geographers interested in culture tended to look outside the field for theoretical inspiration, to, for example, the work of radical cultural theorists such as Raymond Williams and such prominent French philosophers and sociologists Michel Foucault and Pierre Bourdieu.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 10.7251/Her1115001g
    U UDC 911.3:930.85 PY F – W IKTIVFZN?K R ,1 1I , , W: + ++ . A (Sauer, 1925), + * (Géographie humaine). N – , + . H . ? \, # - . \* + , . : , , , , . Scienti[ c review paper CONCEPT OF CULTURAL GEOGRAPHY AS A SCIENCE Mirko Gr6i41 1Faculty of Geography at Belgrade University, Republic Serbia Abstract: Cultural geography was created as a reaction on geographic determinism and static descriptive approach in researching of the characteristics of cultural elements and forms distribution in classical anthropogeography. An American geographer Carl Sauer (1925) is considered to be its founder, although its aspects were present in Anthropogeography and Human geography (Géographie humaine) before. Even today, Cultural geography is de[ ned differently - as a strict science with its methodological apparatus, or as an aspect or way of looking in geography. Sauer has de[ ned this science in the spirit of possibilistic concept of geography of Paul Vidal de la Blache. In the spirit of this concept Jovan Cviji4’s Serbian anthropogeography school was developed, which also has expressive cultural-geographical aspect. The aim of this paper is to discuss issues of subject and methodological essence of Cultural geography in the light of different approaches and directions of development. Key words: Cultural geography, culturology, anthropogeography, cultural landscape, landshaft. ________________________________________________________________________________________________ HTJ INTRODUCTION V (. culture – #+, The word culture (lat. culture - cultivation, ) production) appeared in French language (XIII (XIII ), - century), followed by the words of a cultiva- – # * (agriculture, tor and cultivate - to cultivate the land (agri- civiculture, horticulture). X culture, civic culture, horticulture). It had to be „“ , .. - followed by “cultivating” the man, i.e. spiri- 1 NT ]NB MIRKO GR5I3 . H (XVIII tual culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Geography. Different Encounters, Encountering Difference
    DAG 50 001-140 9/4/08 18:39 Página 105 Doc. Anàl. Geogr. 50, 2007 105-120 Cultural geography. Different encounters, encountering difference Robyn Longhurst University of Waikato. Department of Geography, Tourism and Environmental Planning Private Bag 3105. Hamilton. New Zealand [email protected] Data de recepció: agost del 2007 Data d’acceptació definitiva: setembre del 2007 Abstract In the first half of this paper it is argued that cultural geography is a dynamic and diverse field that extends well beyond a single branch of human geography. The boundaries between it and other sub-disciplines are often blurred. People have «different» encounters with cul- tural geography depending on their sub-disciplinary convergences. People also have dif- ferent encounters with cultural geography depending on where they live and work. «Place matters» in the construction, production and representation of cultural geography. It takes different forms in different places. In the second half of the paper it is argued that as cul- tural geography continues to encounter «difference» in many guises, four possible future trends are likely: first, it is probable that there will be continued growth in cultural geog- raphy; second, there may be mounting recognition that cultural geography needs to be critical offering possibilities for radical critique and reflection; third, cultural geographers are likely to continue with their efforts to think about what, if anything, might lie beyond representation; and finally, cultural geographers are likely to deepen their reflections on the politics of knowledge production leading to more multi-language publishing practices in this area. Key words: bodies, critical approach, cultural geography, emotions, place.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Theorizing Has Dramatically Increased
    Cultural CHAPTER 9 Theorizing Another Embarassing Confession Like the concept of social structure, the conceptualization of culture in sociology is rather vague, despite a great deal of attention by sociologists to the properties and dynamics of cul- ture. There has always been the recognition that culture is attached to social structures, and vice versa, with the result that sociologists often speak in terms of sociocultural formations or sociocultural systems and structures. This merging of structure and culture rarely clarifies but, instead, further conflates a precise definition of culture. And so, sociology’s big idea— culture—is much like the notion of social structure. Its conceptualization is somewhat meta- phorical, often rather imprecise, and yet highly evocative. There is no consensus in defini- tions of culture beyond the general idea that humans create symbol systems, built from our linguistic capacities, which are used to regulate conduct. And even this definition would be challenged by some. Since the 1980s and accelerating with each decade, the amount of cultural theorizing has dramatically increased. Mid-twentieth-century functional theory had emphasized the importance of culture but not in a context-specific or robust manner; rather, functional- ism viewed culture as a mechanism by which actions are controlled and regulated,1 whereas much of the modern revival of culture has viewed culture in a much more robust and inclusive manner. When conflict theory finally pushed functionalism from center stage, it also tended to bring forth a more Marxian view of culture as a “superstructure” generated by economic substructures. Culture became the sidekick, much like Tonto for the Lone Ranger, to social structure, with the result that its autonomy and force indepen- dent of social structures were not emphasized and, in some cases, not even recognized.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CULTURAL APPROACH in GEOGRAPHY: PRACTICES and NARRATIVES Paul CLAVAL University of Paris-Sorbonne, France
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by OpenstarTs THE CULTURAL APPROACH IN GEOGRAPHY: PRACTICES AND NARRATIVES Paul CLAVAL University of Paris-Sorbonne, France 1. Introduction What does the cultural approach offer to geography? In order to answer this question, we have carried out two types of analyses: 1- we examined the 90 communications presented duing the Conference of our Commission in Rio de Janeiro on 10-12 June 2003; 2- we compared recents books on cultural geography : those of Mike Crang (1998) for Britain, Giuliana Andreotti (1996-1997) and Adalberto Vallega (2003) for Italy, Boris Grésillon (2002) for France and Don Mitchell (2000) for the United States. The conceptions I have personally developed served as counterpoints in this analysis (Claval, 1995-2002). 2. Cultural geographers at work: the Conference of Rio de Janeiro The Conference of Rio de Janeiro dealt with The Historical Dimensions of the Relationships Between Space and Culture (Abreu M., 2003). Some colleagues explored directly the way culture shapes temporalities and spatialities. Most have chosen to start from the research they normally develop in order to show how culture imposes its marks on space and duration: their papers offer in an overview of the objects and practices of contemporary cultural geography. 2.1. Culture and the qualitative differenciation of space Some communications deal with: (i) the relations between human groups and the natural environment they live in; (ii) the significance they give to Cosmos, Earth and Life in this World through the religious beliefs they profess and the ceremonies and rituals they perform; (iii) the procedures of political regulation they mobilize.
    [Show full text]
  • Conflicts Among Civilizations: the Nfluei Nce Behind War and Art Ross Pickett Roger Williams University
    Reason and Respect Volume 4 Article 8 Issue 1 Spring 2008 4-1-2008 Conflicts among Civilizations: The nflueI nce behind War and Art Ross Pickett Roger Williams University Follow this and additional works at: http://docs.rwu.edu/rr Recommended Citation Pickett, Ross (2008) "Conflicts among Civilizations: The nflueI nce behind War and Art," Reason and Respect: Vol. 4: Iss. 1, Article 8. Available at: http://docs.rwu.edu/rr/vol4/iss1/8 Copyright ©4-1-2008 by the authors Reason and Respect is produced by The Berkeley Electronic Press (bepress). For more information, please contact [email protected]. Pickett: Conflicts among Civilizations: The Influence behind War and Art Conflicts among Civilizations: The Influence behind War and Art Ross Pickett, Marketing ‘09 The idea that conflicts among civilizations result from a cultural difference rather than an economic or political standpoint is a courageous one. These conflicts are too deeply rooted and complex to analyze in one single concept. Using only this central point, this theory attempts to define the reason behind all civilization, conflicts, and why culture exists. Is not money or economic value an underlying factor in wars throughout time? Political events have an incredibly important impact on the inhabitants of a civilization. Do these events not have influence on people, and in turn affect the ideas and beliefs of a nation? Is the rivalry between two peoples really caused by its cultural differences; or the thrill of competition, conquering, and becoming the most powerful? These questions come to mind when trying to validate the theory that conflict results from a cultural difference.
    [Show full text]
  • Re Ections on the 'Cultural Turn' in British Human Geography
    Norsk geogr. Tidsskr. Vol. 55, 166–172. Oslo. ISSN 0029-1951 Whatever happened to the social? Re ections on the ‘cultural turn’ in British human geography GILL VALENTINE Valentine, G. 2001. Whatever happened to the social? Re ections on the ‘cultural turn’ in British human geography. Norsk Geo- gra sk Tidsskrift–Norwegian Journal of Geography Vol. 55, 166–172. Oslo. ISSN 0029-1951. This paper focuses on the ‘cultural turn’ which has taken place in British and to a lesser extent North American and Australian human geography in the last decade. It begins by exploring what constitutes the cultural in what has been dubbed ‘new cultural geography’. It then explores contemporary claims that cultural geography has eclipsed or marginalised social geography. The nal section evaluates these claims about the demise of the social, arguing that the social has not been evacuated but rather has been rede ned. While this paper tells a speci c story about a particular tradition and geographical frame of reference, it nonetheless has wider relevance because it provides an example of the differential development of particular sub-disciplinar y areas, of the way sub- disciplinary knowledges shape each other, and of the way understanding s of disciplinar y trends are contested. Keywords: cultural turn, geographical thought, social Gill Valentine, Department of Geography, University of Shef eld, Winter Street, Shef eld, S10 2TN, UK. E-mail: G.Valentine@ shef eld.ac.uk Introduction dimensions. (Jackson 1989). Methodologically, Sauer was in uenced by anthropology, from which he derived a This paper focuses on the ‘cultural turn’ which has taken commitment to ethnographic eld research.
    [Show full text]
  • Foundations of Cultural Geography Series University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
    Foundations of Cultural Geography Series University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee PRENTICE-HALL, INC., Englewood Cliffs, NJ. fomy parer& @I 1969 by Prentice-Hall, Inc. Englewood Cl+, NJ. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprodrrced in any form OT by any means without permission in writing from the publisher. Printed in the United States of America. Library of Congress Catalog Card No.: 69-14550 Current printing (last number): 10 9 Drau;ings and photogrtiphs by the author. PRENTICE-HALL INTERNATIONAL, INC., London PRENTICE-HALL OF AUSTRALIA, PTY. LTD., Sydney PRENTICE-HALL OF CANADA, LTD., Toronto PRENTICE-HALL OF INDIA PRIVATE LTD., New Delhi PRENTICE-HALL OF JAPAN, INC.,. Tokyo CH TER socio-culfural factors and houseform The Basic Hypothesis The different forms taken by dwellings are a complex phenomenon for which no single explanation will suffice. All possible explanations, however, are variations on a single theme: people with very different attitudes and ideals respond to varied physical environments. These re- sponses vary from place to place because of changes and differences in the interplay of social.. cultural, ritual, economic, ilLid physical factors. These factors and responses may al?0 chal .;c gradually in the same place with the passage of time; howeve:, 1 - _ of rapid change and persistence of form are characteristic of prirn?:rT.. and vernacular dwellings. The house is an institution -ot just a structure, created for a com- plex set of purposes. Because building a house is a cultural phenomenon, its form and organization are greatly influenced by the cultural milieu to which it belongs.
    [Show full text]
  • ISSN 2072-7941 (Online), ISSN 2072-1692 (Print)
    ISSN 2072-7941 (Online), ISSN 2072-1692 (Print). Гуманітарний вісник ЗДІА. 2016. № 67 УДК 1:[316.7:316.324.8] NIKITENKO, VITALINA PhD in Philosophy, Аssistant professor of the Department of foreign languages and linguistic communication, Zaporizhya Engineering Academy (Zaporozhye, Ukraine) E-mail: [email protected] __________________________________________________________________________ CULTURAL AND SOCIAL COMPETENCE CREATION IN THE PROCESS OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE STUDY: INFORMATION SOCIETY ASPECT The present article analyzes the foreign language teaching approaches in the studying process of social and cultural sciences such as social philosophy, political science, cultural studies, psychology, sociology, history and others that possess a number of units and structural elements of the social and humanitarian sciences; The article defines the importance of facing to the cultural and geocultural values during the foreign languages studying and reveals its significance. Each of the above sciences studies the specific features of geoculture which can extend our knowledge by the means of foreign language on the one hand and to master the foreign language with the help of the mentioned subjects from the other hand. Key words: foreign language, studying process, teaching approaches, geoculture, geoculture of linguistics, structural analysis, language characteristics, information society Problem definition as a whole and its relationship with important scientific or practical tasks At present, everyone is put in difficult conditions of social life by the dynamism of controversial world. Growing tensions are associated with changing of orientations, the need to search and quickly find solutions, stress - all the problems of human life, the preservation and development of the individual, his inner world, the formation of the person of socialization spiritual growth, and therefore at the forefront a culture that has a high mission - to solve global problems facing the modern world community.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnicity, Multiculturalism and the Problem of Culture
    Ethnicity, Multiculturalism and the Problem of Culture Aleksandra Ålund The self-archived postprint version of this journal article is available at Linköping University Institutional Repository (DiVA): http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-45213 N.B.: When citing this work, cite the original publication. This is an electronic version of an article published in: Ålund, A., (1999), Ethnicity, Multiculturalism and the Problem of Culture, European Societies, 1(1), 105-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.1999.10749927 Original publication available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.1999.10749927 Copyright: Taylor & Francis (Routledge) (SSH Titles - no Open Select) http://www.routledge.com/ ETHNICITY, MULTICULTURALISM AND THE PROBLEM OF CULTURE Aleksandra Alund Universityof UmeA, Sweden Abstract: This articlediscusses the complex meaning of ethnicity and identity in the multicultural society of today with reference to Swedish society. Sweden, a pronouncedly multiethnic society, is today undergoing division along ethnic lines. Social inequalities tend to be understood in terms of cultural difference. This development seems to be characteristic of most European countries. Culture is usually connected with ethnicity and race and understood as pure, as an 'essence', as related to some original and eternal ethnic core. In this way importantaspects of cultural dynamic in multicultural societya re leftunobserved. What is usually not recognized are cultural crossings and the emergence of composite identities. Within the framework of multicultural society new cultures, identities and ethnicities are created. Departing from some general features of the dominant discourse on ethnicity, its historical roots and its relations to culture and multiculturalism, I discuss problems of cultural essentialism.
    [Show full text]
  • Qt7hc733q3.Pdf
    UC Berkeley GAIA Research Series Title The Myth of "Ethnic Conflict": Politics, Economics, and "Cultural" Violence Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7hc733q3 Journal Research Series, uciaspubs/research/98 Authors Crawford, Beverly Lipschutz, Ronnie D. Publication Date 1998 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California The Myth of “Ethnic Conflict”: Politics, Economics, and “Cultural” Violence Edited by Beverly Crawford and Ronnie D. Lipschutz Description: In the last decade, discourses of economic and political liberalization and globalization have swept the world. Yet during this same period and all across the globe, many states are fragmenting and more than 30 ethnic and sectarian conflicts have displaced or killed millions of people — and far more civilians than soldiers. The authors in this volume argue that much of this violence is closely linked to those globalizing forces and demands for economic liberalization which have weakened states' capacities, both political and financial, for redistributing resources. As a result, many states have been forced to break established social contracts, often dramatically changing power relations in heterogeneous societies that previously had been relatively stable. Drawing on case studies from Asia, Eastern Europe, North Africa, the former Soviet Union, and the United States, the authors demonstrate how these distributional issues and power shifts have been experienced as ethnic and religious discrimination and are often at the root of identity politics and violent, so-called “cultural,” conflicts. RESEARCH SERIES / NUMBER 98 The Myth of “Ethnic Conflict”: Politics, Economics, and “Cultural” Violence Beverly Crawford and Ronnie D. Lipschutz, Editors UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEY Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The myth of “ethnic conflict” : politics, economics, and “cultural” violence / Beverly Crawford and Ronnie D.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Influence of the Cultural Perspective on Cross Cultural Conflict: an Analysis of Cultural Environment
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Akhtar, Faiza; Lodhi, Suleman Aziz; Khan, Safdar Shah Article Assessing the influence of the cultural perspective on cross cultural conflict: An analysis of cultural environment Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences (PJCSS) Provided in Cooperation with: Johar Education Society, Pakistan (JESPK) Suggested Citation: Akhtar, Faiza; Lodhi, Suleman Aziz; Khan, Safdar Shah (2016) : Assessing the influence of the cultural perspective on cross cultural conflict: An analysis of cultural environment, Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences (PJCSS), ISSN 2309-8619, Johar Education Society, Pakistan (JESPK), Lahore, Vol. 10, Iss. 1, pp. 84-103 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/188242 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence.
    [Show full text]
  • What Biculturalism Is and Why It Matters
    Multicultural Identity and Experiences: Cultural, Social, and Personality Processes Verónica Benet-Martínez ICREA1 and Universitat Pompeu Fabra To appear in K. Deaux & M. Snyder (Eds.), Handbook of Personality and Social Psychology. Oxford University Press. 2nd edition. Date: December 2016 1Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies 1 Abstract This chapter discusses the cultural and social-personality psychological processes involved in multicultural experiences and identities, and the societal factors which influence these phenomena. To do so, relevant findings and theories from the subfields of acculturation, sociology, cultural, social, and personality psychologies are reviewed and integrated. The chapter includes sections devoted to defining multiculturalism and its components at the individual, group, and societal level, explaining the links between multiculturalism and related constructs such as acculturation and interculturalism, and synthesizing the fast growing literatures on cultural frame-switching, individual differences in multicultural identity, and outcomes resulting from multicultural identities and experiences. The chapter concludes with a discussion of future challenges and needed directions in the psychological study of multiculturalism. Key words: Multiculturalism, multicultural, biculturalism, bicultural, interculturalism, intercultural, acculturation, bicultural identity integration, identity, ethnicity, culture 2 Multiculturalism: Cultural, Social, and Personality Processes “Each day I am reminded of
    [Show full text]