DOCSLIB.ORG

What Biculturalism Is and Why It Matters

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Multicultural Identity and Experiences: Cultural, Social, and Personality Processes Verónica Benet-Martínez ICREA1 and Universitat Pompeu Fabra To appear in K. Deaux & M. Snyder (Eds.), Handbook of Personality and Social Psychology. Oxford University Press. 2nd edition. Date: December 2016 1Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies 1 Abstract This chapter discusses the cultural and social-personality psychological processes involved in multicultural experiences and identities, and the societal factors which influence these phenomena. To do so, relevant findings and theories from the subfields of acculturation, sociology, cultural, social, and personality psychologies are reviewed and integrated. The chapter includes sections devoted to defining multiculturalism and its components at the individual, group, and societal level, explaining the links between multiculturalism and related constructs such as acculturation and interculturalism, and synthesizing the fast growing literatures on cultural frame-switching, individual differences in multicultural identity, and outcomes resulting from multicultural identities and experiences. The chapter concludes with a discussion of future challenges and needed directions in the psychological study of multiculturalism. Key words: Multiculturalism, multicultural, biculturalism, bicultural, interculturalism, intercultural, acculturation, bicultural identity integration, identity, ethnicity, culture 2 Multiculturalism: Cultural, Social, and Personality Processes “Each day I am reminded of the fact that I have two cultures. All I have to do is write down my name to see this!” -- Nigerian-American bicultural participant in Huynh, Benet-Martinez, & Nguyen´s (2016) study We live in a time with unprecedented rates of connectivity, as physical and psychological boundaries defined by geography, traditional social roles, and limited means of global mobility and communication have greatly weakened. Consequently, more people with different cultural and ethnic backgrounds are interacting with each other, and more people are being exposed to multiple cultures. In sum, multicultural experiences have become a regular component of many individuals’ lives, and growing numbers of individuals also describe themselves as bicultural or multicultural.1 This phenomenon is, at least in part, driven by the large demographic changes resulting from migration. For instance, it is projected than in less than 40 years US-born and foreign-born ethnic and cultural minorities will constitute more than half of the country´s population (United States Census Bureau, 2009). High numbers of multicultural individuals can also be found in other nations where migration has been historically strong (e.g., Germany, The Netherlands, Canada, Australia, Singapore), where there is a history of colonization (e.g., Hong Kong), or in multi-nation states (e.g., Belgium, Spain). Because of its widespread societal impact, multiculturalism has attracted the interest of politicians and world leaders, policy makers, educators, businesspersons, and social scientists (BBC, 2011). The study of multiculturalism has exciting and transformative implications for social and developmental psychology, as the issue of how individuals develop and affirm their (national, cultural, ethnic, religious) social identities and group memberships becomes particularly meaningful in situations of cultural clashing, mixing, and integration (Deaux & Verkuyten, 2014; Vedder & Phinney, 2014). Furthermore, the issue of how and why people vary 3 in how they make sense of these experiences provides personality psychologists with a window through which to study individual differences in identity dynamics and reactions to intercultural contact (van der Zee & van Oudenhoven, 2014). In fact, as eloquently said by Phinney (1999): “… increasing numbers of people find that the conflicts are not between different groups but between different cultural values, attitudes, and expectations within themselves” (p. 27; italics added). The study of multiculturalism also affords unique methodological tools to social and personality psychologists. By virtue of having two or more cultures that can be independently manipulated, multicultural individuals give researchers a quasi-experimental design ideal for the study of how culture affects behavior (Hong, Morris, Chiu, & Benet-Martínez, 2000). In addition, previously identified cross-cultural differences can be replicated in studies with multicultural individuals without the counfounding effects (i.e., differences in SES and language, translation issues) that often characterize cross-national comparisons (e.g., Ramirez-Esparza, Gosling, Benet-Martínez, Potter, & Pennebaker, 2006). The main goal of this chapter is to review and integrate relevant findings and theories on multiculturalism from social, personality, and cultural psychologies, and propose an agenda for future studies. Because multiculturalism issues are still relatively new to mainstream social and personality psychology, this chapter also includes sections devoted to defining the constructs of multiculturalism and multicultural identity, and discussing key issues from the fields of acculturation and interculturalism studies. Defining Multiculturalism: Individual, Inter-Group, and Societal Levels Definitions of multiculturalism at the individual level range from those based on socio- demographic characteristics (e.g., being an immigrant or descendant of immigrants, being an 4 ethnic/cultural minority, having parents from two different cultures) to those refereeing to particular psychological experiences (e.g., multicultural exposure; having diverse cultural values, competencies, and/or identifications). Broadly speaking then, those who have mixed ethnic or racial backgrounds, those who have lived in more than one country (such as long-term expatriates and international students, immigrants, and refugees), those reared with at least one other culture in addition to the dominant mainstream culture (such as children of immigrants or colonized people), and those in inter-cultural relationships may all be considered multicultural individuals (Benet-Martinez & Hong, 2014). Common to all these types of individuals is the experience of having been exposed to and having internalized (elements from) two or more cultures (Hong et al., 2000; Nguyen & Benet-Martínez, 2007). Many of these individuals are also likely to develop a multicultural identity –i.e., a type of cultural identity that incorporates attachments with and loyalties toward two or more cultures (Benet-Martínez & Haritatos, 2005). Yet note that being a multicultural individual, or having multicultural experiences, doesn’t guarantee having a multicultural identity. Multicultural identity is only one component (although perhaps a very important one) of the more complex and multidimensional notion of multiculturalism. That is, an individual who has been socialized in more than one culture is a multicultural person, but only when this individual expresses a sense of belonging with these cultures it can be said that the individual has an (explicit) multicultural identity. This is because acquisition of knowledge from a new culture does not always produce identification with that culture (Hong, Wan, No, & Chiu, 2007). In fact, research on multiculturalism should differentiate between the study of processes relevant to the multicultural mind --i.e., how an individual acquires knowledge from multiple cultures and how this knowledge is used to navigate the social world-- and those pertaining to the multicultural self --i.e., how an individual 5 makes sense of multicultural experiences and influences in terms of her or his identity (Hong & Khei, 2014). Multicultural identity involves a significant degree of identification with more than one culture; however, it does not presuppose similar degrees of identification with all the internalized cultures. Further, having a multicultural identity involves following the norms of more than one culture, or at least being cognizant of them. This premise is supported by social identity research showing that individuals who identify strongly (vs. weakly) with a culture are more likely to follow that culture’s prescribed and intersubjective norms (Jetten, Postmes, & Mcauliffe, 2002; Wan, Chiu, Peng, & Tam, 2007), and that for these individuals cultural norms have greater impact on behavioral intentions than personal attitudes (Terry, Hogg, & White, 1999). Lastly, multiculturalism should not be confused with multilingualism (having fluency in multiple languages), although these terms are conceptually related given the interrelatedness of language learning and cultural learning (Ji, Zhang, & Nisbett, 2004) and the fact that many multicultural individuals are also multilingual (Grosjean, 1996; Ramirez-Esparza & Garcia-Sierra, 2014).2 Similarly, multiculturalism is also highly relevant to the experience of many multiracial individuals (Sanchez, Shih, & Wilton, 2014). SOCIETAL AND INTER-GROUP LEVELS Multicultural ideologies and policies advocate the inclusion and equal value of distinct cultural groups (for extensive reviews of the history and nature of different types of diversity management policies across societies see Berry & Sam, 2014; Novoa & Moghaddam, 2014). Examples of government-endorsed multicultural policies are dual citizenship, government support for media outlets (e.g., newspapers, television, radio) in minority languages, support for cultural minority holidays, celebrations,
Recommended publications
  • Complexity of Culture: the Role of Identity and Context in Bicultural Individuals’ Body Ideals

    Complexity of Culture: the Role of Identity and Context in Bicultural Individuals’ Body Ideals

    Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology © 2012 American Psychological Association 2012, Vol. 18, No. 3, 247–257 1099-9809/12/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/a0028730 Complexity of Culture: The Role of Identity and Context in Bicultural Individuals’ Body Ideals Mei Guan, Fiona Lee, and Elizabeth R. Cole University of Michigan Culture plays an important role in shaping body image, and people from different cultures have different beliefs about what constitutes the “ideal” body type. This study examines the relationship between culture and body ideals in Asian-American and Black-American women. Results from two studies show that subjective cultural identity and situational cultural cues had different relationships with body ideals. Among Asian-American women, identification with Asian culture was related to a thinner body ideal, but exposure to Asian cultural cues (relative to American cultural cues) was related to a thicker body ideal. Among Black-American women, identification with Black culture was related to a thicker body ideal, but exposure to Black cultural cues (relative to American cultural cues) was related to a thinner body ideal. These results have theoretical and practical implications for understanding how internal and external manifestations of culture can differentially influence body image. Keywords: culture, body image, body ideals, bicultural individuals, cultural identification, cultural cues Body ideals, or idealized forms of body types, are often rooted Martı´nez, Lee, & Leu, 2006; Miramontez, Benet-Martnez, & in cultural values. For example, Black or African-American cul- Nguyen, 2008). Even though these streams of biculturalism re- tures are more likely to value thick and curvaceous body types search examined different samples, they all focused on individuals (Craig, 2006), whereas Asian cultures value thin and slender who are exposed to and proficient in multiple cultures.
  • Democracy's Graveyards?

    Democracy's Graveyards?

    review Michael Mann, The Dark Side of Democracy: Explaining Ethnic Cleansing Cambridge University Press: Cambridge 2005, £18.99, paperback 584 pp, 0 521 53854 8 Dylan Riley DEMOCRACY’S GRAVEYARDS? The murderous ‘ethnic cleansing’ of civilian populations remains one of the unexplained scandals of world history, although such events seem to have occurred almost as frequently as social revolutions. Over the past 150 years alone, mass killings of indigenous groups by colonial or settler states, of Armenians by Turkish forces and their allies, of Jews by the Nazis, of Tutsis by Hutus, have far exceeded any rational military or economic calculation. But historical and comparative sociology has had relatively little to say about these deeds. Debate about the causes of ethnic cleansing is instead domi- nated by ahistorical and individualistic models. Michael Mann’s impressive The Dark Side of Democracy makes a giant step toward specifying the concrete social structures and circumstances that produce such results. Its scale is vast—over 500 pages of dense theorization and historical narrative, encom- passing a temporal arc that stretches from ancient Assyria to the Rwandan genocide—while its unforgettable analyses of perpetrators and their actions display an almost ethno-methodological sensibility to the micro-foundations of social life, a new dimension for this master of the grand narrative. It is a major achievement. The Dark Side of Democracy’s mass of historical evidence is marshalled to test a strikingly bold central thesis: that ethnic cleansing is the dark side of democracy, in the sense that the latter is premised on the creation of an ethnic community that ‘trumps’ or ‘displaces’ class divisions.
  • American Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples

    American Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples

    Approved in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic June 14, 2016 During the Forty-sixth Ordinary Period of Sessions of the OAS General Assembly AMERICAN DECLARATION ON THE RIGHTS OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES Organization of American States General Secretariat Secretariat of Access to Rights and Equity Department of Social Inclusion 1889 F Street, NW | Washington, DC 20006 | USA 1 (202) 370 5000 www.oas.org ISBN 978-0-8270-6710-3 More rights for more people OAS Cataloging-in-Publication Data Organization of American States. General Assembly. Regular Session. (46th : 2016 : Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic) American Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples : AG/RES.2888 (XLVI-O/16) : (Adopted at the thirds plenary session, held on June 15, 2016). p. ; cm. (OAS. Official records ; OEA/Ser.P) ; (OAS. Official records ; OEA/ Ser.D) ISBN 978-0-8270-6710-3 1. American Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2016). 2. Indigenous peoples--Civil rights--America. 3. Indigenous peoples--Legal status, laws, etc.--America. I. Organization of American States. Secretariat for Access to Rights and Equity. Department of Social Inclusion. II. Title. III. Series. OEA/Ser.P AG/RES.2888 (XLVI-O/16) OEA/Ser.D/XXVI.19 AG/RES. 2888 (XLVI-O/16) AMERICAN DECLARATION ON THE RIGHTS OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES (Adopted at the third plenary session, held on June 15, 2016) THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY, RECALLING the contents of resolution AG/RES. 2867 (XLIV-O/14), “Draft American Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples,” as well as all previous resolutions on this issue; RECALLING ALSO the declaration “Rights of the Indigenous Peoples of the Americas” [AG/DEC.
  • UC Riverside UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations

    UC Riverside UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations

    UC Riverside UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Examining Implicit Acculturation and Bicultural Identity Integration Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/89d9n1wp Author Miramontez, Daniel Robert Publication Date 2010 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALFORNIA RIVERSIDE Examining Implicit Acculturation and Bicultural Identity Integration A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Psychology by Daniel Robert Miramontez August 2010 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Veronica Benet-Martinez, Chairperson Dr. Carolyn Murray Dr. Thierry Devos Copyright by Daniel Robert Miramontez 2010 Acknowledgements I would formally like to acknowledge the Psychology Department for their continued support of this dissertation. Specifically, Faye Harmer (Graduate Student Officer) and Diane Fewkes (Management Services Officer) for their guidance, support, and direction throughout my Ph.D. program. I would also like to acknowledge my dissertation committee members Drs. Veronica Benet-Martinez (Chair) and Thierry Devos for all of their influential feedback that has really helped shape this dissertation into what it is. A very special acknowledgement to committee member Dr. Carolyn Murray whose mentorship and guidance has been unparallel and has given me the necessary support, skills, confidence, and belief to finish my dissertation. Finally, I would like to offer two special acknowledgements to Susanna Luu and Ebrahim Azarisooreh, two research assistants who really pulled through for me in times where it seemed like it was impossible for me to finish my dissertation. Without the prolonged help, sacrifice, and dedication of these two individuals, this dissertation would have never been finished.
  • Strong Cultures and Subcultures in Dynamic Organizations

    Strong Cultures and Subcultures in Dynamic Organizations

    02-091 The Role of Subcultures in Agile Organizations Alicia Boisnier Jennifer A. Chatman1 1 The second author wrote this paper while a Marvin Bower Fellow at the Harvard Business School and is grateful for their support. We also thank Elizabeth Mannix, Rita McGrath, and an anonymous reviewer for their insightful suggestions. Copyright © 2002 by Alicia Boisnier and Jennifer A. Chatman Working papers are in draft form. This working paper is distributed for purposes of comment and discussion only. It may not be reproduced without permission of the copyright holder. Copies of working papers are available from the author. The Role of Subcultures in Agile Organizations Alicia Boisnier and Jennifer A. Chatman1 Haas School of Business University of California, Berkeley May 24, 2002 To appear in, R. Petersen and E. Mannix, Leading and managing people in dynamic organizations. Forthcoming, 2002. 1 The second author wrote this paper while a Marvin Bower Fellow at the Harvard Business School and is grateful for their support. We also thank Elizabeth Mannix, Rita McGrath, and an anonymous reviewer for their insightful suggestions. 2 Organizations face increasingly dynamic environments characterized by substantial, and often unpredictable technological, political, and economic change. How can organizations respond rapidly to such changes or become more agile? Organizational agility, according to Lee Dyer, “requires a judicious mix of stability and reconfigurability” (2001: 4). We consider an unlikely source of agility: organizational culture. This may seem like an odd juxtaposition since strong unitary cultures exert a stabilizing force on organizations by encouraging cohesion, organizational commitment, and desirable work behaviors among members (e.g., Deal & Kennedy, 1982; Nemeth & Staw, 1989; O'Reilly & Chatman, 1986).
  • Cultural Rights in the United States: a Conflict of Aluesv

    Cultural Rights in the United States: a Conflict of Aluesv

    Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality Volume 5 Issue 2 Article 3 June 1987 Cultural Rights in the United States: A Conflict of aluesV Sharon O'Brien Follow this and additional works at: https://lawandinequality.org/ Recommended Citation Sharon O'Brien, Cultural Rights in the United States: A Conflict of aluesV , 5(2) LAW & INEQ. 267 (1987). Available at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/lawineq/vol5/iss2/3 Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality is published by the University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing. Cultural Rights in the United States: A Conflict of Values Sharon O'Brien* Introduction ................................................... 268 I. Historical Development of Minority Rights ............. 270 Historical Examples of Pluralistic Arrangements ..... 271 International Protection of Group Rights ............. 273 Leading National Examples of Group Rights Protection ............................................. 279 Twentieth-Century Pluralist Thought ................. 281 The United States and the Rights of Minorities ...... 283 Available Constitutional Mechanisms ................. 287 II. Am erican Indians ....................................... 290 Historical Background and Assimilation Efforts ...... 290 Cultural Protection ................................... 296 Freedom of Religion .................................. 298 III. Native Hawaiians ........................................ 308 Historical Background ................................. 308 Cultural Protection ................................... 314 Protection of the
  • Marshall High School Mr. Cline Sociology Unit Four AB * What Is Culture?

    Marshall High School Mr. Cline Sociology Unit Four AB * What Is Culture?

    CULTURE Marshall High School Mr. Cline Sociology Unit Four AB * What is Culture? • Integration and Diversity • Imagine that this is the early twentieth century and you are a teacher in a school in New York. Whom would you see around you? Some Irish kids, some Italians, maybe some Armenians, Puerto Ricans, Mexicans, African Americans? How do you reach all of these different languages and cultures to facilitate learning when you do not have the time to teach each one individually in their own way? • There are social forces that would state that assimilation is the way to go about this task. Assimilation is merely the process by which newcomers to America, as well as other “outsiders,” give up their culturally distinct beliefs, values and customs and take on those of the dominant culture. • The opposite viewpoint would acknowledge that there is a tendency to preserve cultural diversity, to keep one’s own personal heritage alive and to respect the rights of others to do so. This is known as multi culturalism. * What is Culture? • Integration and Diversity • The tension between assimilation and multi culturalism is evident in many schools and other public institutions throughout the United States. How much multi culturalism is good for society versus how much we want people to identify and share the common culture of America is an ongoing, and often heated argument. • One result of assimilation is cultural integration, that is the degree to which a culture is a functionally integrated system, so that all the parts fit together well. On another level, the elements of culture are functionally integrated with other facets of society, such as social structure and power relations.
  • Ethnicity, Confession and Intercultural Dialogue at the European Union's

    Ethnicity, Confession and Intercultural Dialogue at the European Union's

    Munich Personal RePEc Archive Ethnicity, Confession and Intercultural Dialogue at the European Union’s East Border Brie, Mircea and Horga, Ioan and Şipoş, Sorin University of Oradea, Romania 2011 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/44082/ MPRA Paper No. 44082, posted 31 Jan 2013 05:28 UTC ETHNICITY, CONFESSION AND INTERCULTURAL DIALOGUE AT THE EUROPEAN UNION EASTERN BORDER ETHNICITY, CONFESSION AND INTERCULTURAL DIALOGUE AT THE EUROPEAN UNION EASTERN BORDER Mircea BRIE Ioan HORGA Sorin ŞIPOŞ (Coordinators) Debrecen/Oradea 2011 This present volume contains the papers of the international conference Ethnicity, Confession and Intercultural Dialogue at the European Union‟s East Border, held in Oradea between 2nd-5th of June 2011, organized by Institute for Euroregional Studies Oradea-Debrecen, University of Oradea and Department of International Relations and European Studies, with the support of the European Commission and Bihor County Council. CONTENTS INTRODUCTORY STUDIES Mircea BRIE Ethnicity, Religion and Intercultural Dialogue in the European Border Space.......11 Ioan HORGA Ethnicity, Religion and Intercultural Education in the Curricula of European Studies .......19 MINORITY AND MAJORITY IN THE EASTERN EUROPEAN AREA Victoria BEVZIUC Electoral Systems and Minorities Representations in the Eastern European Area........31 Sergiu CORNEA, Valentina CORNEA Administrative Tools in the Protection and Promotion of the Rights of Ethnic Minorities .............................................................................................................47
  • The Treatment of Ethnic Minority Groups in Vietnam: Hmongs and Montagnards1

    The Treatment of Ethnic Minority Groups in Vietnam: Hmongs and Montagnards1

    19th July 2017 (COI up to 20 June 2017) Vietnam Query Response: The treatment of ethnic minority groups in Vietnam: Hmongs and Montagnards1 Explanatory Note Sources and databases consulted List of Acronyms Issues for research 1) Background information on ethnic minority groups in Vietnam 2) Freedom of Religion a) How does Decree 92 (Specific provisions and measures for the implementation of the Ordinance on Belief and Religion, 1 January 2013) affect the right to freedom of religion in practice? b) Latest information with regards to the November 2016 ‘Law on Belief and Religion’ c) What restrictions or limitations are imposed by the authorities on Hmongs’ and Montagnards’ right to practice their faith? i) Reports of forced conversion (from Protestantism to animism) ii) Treatment by the police for religious reasons, including harassment, intimidation, monitoring, arrest and imprisonment iii) Reports of obstructing religious ceremonies (e.g. in house churches) or damaging religious property 3) Confiscation of land of Hmongs and Montagnards a) Information on the practices related to legal expropriation and illegal confiscation of land in Vietnam, including in relation to industrial development projects in the geographical areas where Hmong/Montagnards are living 4) Freedom of Movement of Hmongs and Montagnards a) Are the legal provisions of Art 274 of the Penal Code (Illegally leaving or entering the country: illegally staying abroad or in Vietnam) and Art 91 of the Penal Code (Fleeing abroad or defecting to stay overseas with a view to
  • Cultural Theorizing Has Dramatically Increased

    Cultural Theorizing Has Dramatically Increased

    Cultural CHAPTER 9 Theorizing Another Embarassing Confession Like the concept of social structure, the conceptualization of culture in sociology is rather vague, despite a great deal of attention by sociologists to the properties and dynamics of cul- ture. There has always been the recognition that culture is attached to social structures, and vice versa, with the result that sociologists often speak in terms of sociocultural formations or sociocultural systems and structures. This merging of structure and culture rarely clarifies but, instead, further conflates a precise definition of culture. And so, sociology’s big idea— culture—is much like the notion of social structure. Its conceptualization is somewhat meta- phorical, often rather imprecise, and yet highly evocative. There is no consensus in defini- tions of culture beyond the general idea that humans create symbol systems, built from our linguistic capacities, which are used to regulate conduct. And even this definition would be challenged by some. Since the 1980s and accelerating with each decade, the amount of cultural theorizing has dramatically increased. Mid-twentieth-century functional theory had emphasized the importance of culture but not in a context-specific or robust manner; rather, functional- ism viewed culture as a mechanism by which actions are controlled and regulated,1 whereas much of the modern revival of culture has viewed culture in a much more robust and inclusive manner. When conflict theory finally pushed functionalism from center stage, it also tended to bring forth a more Marxian view of culture as a “superstructure” generated by economic substructures. Culture became the sidekick, much like Tonto for the Lone Ranger, to social structure, with the result that its autonomy and force indepen- dent of social structures were not emphasized and, in some cases, not even recognized.
  • Globalization, World Culture and the Sociology of Taste: Patterns of Cultural Choice in Cross-National Perspective

    Globalization, World Culture and the Sociology of Taste: Patterns of Cultural Choice in Cross-National Perspective

    Globalization, World Culture And The Sociology Of Taste: Patterns Of Cultural Choice In Cross-National Perspective Item Type text; Electronic Dissertation Authors Lizardo, Omar Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 27/09/2021 11:28:29 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/193871 1 GLOBALIZATION, WORLD CULTURE AND THE SOCIOLOGY OF TASTE: PATTERNS OF CULTURAL CHOICE IN CROSS-NATIONAL PERSPECTIVE By Omar Lizardo _________________________ A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of The DEPARTMENT OF SOCIOLOGY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For The Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College University of Arizona 2006 2 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE As members of the Dissertation Committee, we certify that we have read the dissertation prepared by Omar Lizardo entitled Globalization, World Culture And The Sociology Of Taste: Patterns Of Cultural Choice In Cross-National Perspective and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy _______________________________________________________________________ Date: 08/18/06 Ronald L. Breiger _______________________________________________________________________ Date: 08/18/06 Kieran Healy _______________________________________________________________________ Date: 08/18/06 Erin Leahey Final approval and acceptance of this dissertation is contingent upon the candidate’s submission of the final copies of the dissertation to the Graduate College. I hereby certify that I have read this dissertation prepared under my direction and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement.
  • On Psychological Effects of Globalization: Development of a Scale of Global Identity SALMAN TÜRKEN University of Oslo

    On Psychological Effects of Globalization: Development of a Scale of Global Identity SALMAN TÜRKEN University of Oslo

    On Psychological Effects of Globalization: Development of a Scale of Global Identity SALMAN TÜRKEN University of Oslo FLOYD W. RUDMIN University of Tromsø The present study reports the development of a brief scale of global identity. Based on literature review and on responses from 137 students from 24 countries answering open-ended questions, a pool of 113 Likert items was produced, which were then evaluated by 6 experts, resulting in a total trial item pool of 110 items. These items and a social desirability scale were administered to three samples of students: 684 Norwegians, 605 Turkish, and 406 Americans. Items were ranked based on equal weighting of 22 psychometric criteria: a) for each sample, few omissions, low correlation with social desirability, high response standard deviations, high item-total correlations, high correlations with indices of multicultural experience and cosmopolitan behaviour; b) for English and Turkish versions, few words and few characters. The best 24 items were subjected to item analysis, resulting in a 10-item Global Identity Scale (GIS-10) with high Cronbach alpha coefficients in all three samples. Factor analysis found a 2 factor orthogonal solution that replicated in each of the three samples: one factorial sub-scale representing cultural openness and the other representing non-nationalism. “The entire earth is my homeland and all its people my fellow citizens!” (Gibran Khalil Gibran) Internationalism, multiculturalism, and cosmopolitanism are steadily on the global agenda, and individual attachments and identities are in a process of change. Regardless of where we are in the world, we are exposed to global phenomena. Due to ideological shifts in international politics, to institutional changes, and to technological advancements, globalization has, in the last decades, opened physical as well as social borders.