Regional Subcultures of the United States

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Regional Subcultures of the United States Cleveland State University EngagedScholarship@CSU Political Science Faculty Publications Political Science Department 11-1993 Regional Subcultures of the United States Joel A. Lieske Cleveland State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clpolsci_facpub Part of the Political Science Commons How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! Publisher's Statement Copyright 1993 Cambridge University Press. Available on publisher's site at http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0022381600076234. Original Citation Lieske, Joel. 1993. "Regional Subcultures of the United States." Journal of Politics 55:888-913. Repository Citation Lieske, Joel A., "Regional Subcultures of the United States" (1993). Political Science Faculty Publications. 11. https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clpolsci_facpub/11 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Political Science Department at EngagedScholarship@CSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Political Science Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of EngagedScholarship@CSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RegionalSubcultures of the UnitedStates Joel Lieske ClevelandState University This study develops the case, theory, and statisticalmethodology for a new measureof American regional subcultures.Using principalcomponent and cluster analysis on some 45 measuresof racial origin, ethnic ancestry,religious affiliation,and social structure,I show how the entire populationof U.S. counties can be partitionedinto 10 distinctive, regionalsubcultures that are relativelyhomoge- neous and contiguous. Next, I identify the cultural characteristicsof each subcultureand relate my new classificationscheme to the work of Elazar,Gastil, Garreau,and Fischer. Finally, I comparethe relative utility of this new measurewith Elazar'stypology in explainingthe variationin a number of social, political,and policy indicators. More work, in our view, needs to be done, to ascertain whether the cultural clusters that Elazar designates do indeed exist (either at the mass or elite level). This step, it seems to us, should precede attempts to link public policy outputs with political cultures. Unfortu- nately most work has startedwith the second step and assumed the first. (Thompson, Ellis, and Wildavsky1990, 245) ]wenty-seven years ago, Elazar(1984) advanceda revolutionarynew theory of American regional subcultures. This new theory was designed to help explain variationsin the politicalprocesses, institutional structures, political behavior, and policies and programsof state and local government.In short, Elazarargued that subculturaldifferences could help us understand:(1) what state and local govern- ments do, (2) how they are organized,(3) what political rules they observe, and (4) who participatesin the politicalprocess (Press and VerBurg1983). To expedite this task, Elazardeveloped a geopoliticalmapping of the United States that classifies states and local regions into one or a combinationof three political subcultures:individualistic, moralistic, and traditionalistic.In Elazar's typology, there are a total of nine different subculturalclassifications that repre- sent dominantand subordinatecombinations of his three "core"subcultures. His mappingincludes some 50 state and 224 substatedesignations. Since Elazaradvanced his theory, other scholarshave developedtheir own cul- tural classificationschemes and produced their own cultural mappings of the This study owes a heavy intellectualdebt to Dan Elazar,Aaron Wildavsky, and my departedfriend and colleague,Tom Flinn. None of these individuals,of course, bearsany responsibilityfor any errors of analysis or interpretation.I also wish to thank Elazar, the Center for the Study of Federalismat Temple University,and ClevelandState Universityfor their financialsupport of my research. THE JOURNAL OF POLITICS, Vol. 55, No. 4, November 1993, Pp. 888-913 C 1993 by the Universityof Texas Press RegionalSubcultures of the United States 889 United States (Luttbeg 1971; Zelinsky 1973; Gastil 1975; Garreau1981; Morgan and England 1987). However, Luttbeg's (1971) and Morganand England's(1987) classificationschemes are the only mappingsbased on replicable,statistical proce- dures. And Elazar's(1984) typology is the only one that has been subjected to extensiveempirical tests. In reviewingthis literature,Kincaid and I (1991)identify approximately 100 stud- ies that have subjectedElazar's thesis or a subculturalvariation to empiricaltests (e.g., Sharkansky1969; Weber and Shaffer 1972; Johnson 1976; Joslyn 1980; Lowery and Sigelman 1982; Herzik 1985; Fitzpatrickand Hero 1988; Nardulli 1990;Morgan and Watson 1991; Dran, Albritton,and Wyckoff 1991). But as we note, one of the most frequentcriticisms made of this developingliterature con- cerns the difficultiesof measuringpolitical culture. It is well-knownthat Elazar's derivationof the three politicalsubcultures is not based on any rigorousstatistical procedures.Neither are his geopoliticaldesignations based on any empiricaldata, other than historical migrationpatterns, personal field observations,interviews, and scholarly studies of America'sregions2_sections, and ethnoreligiousgroups. Moreover, Elazarhas not adjustedhis mapping of the three subculturesfor the pervasive cultural changes that have occurred in American society. Indeed, his conceptof "culturalgeology" allows for overlayand change.But his state and sub- state classificationsare the same today as they were 27 yearsago. Yet another criticism of Elazar'sclassification scheme is the crudeness of his state and regionaldesignations. According to Elazar(1970, 236), political culture can be definedas the persistent,generational patterns of politicalattitudes, values, beliefs, and behaviorthat characterizea group of people who live in geographical proximity.But what constitutes distinctive subculturesis often a very subjective judgment.And when the geographicalboundaries of a subcultureinclude entire states or large substate regions, there is not a great deal of empiricalprecision. Since the county is the basic unit of state government,it would seem desirableto develop measures that differentiateAmerican subcultures at least down to the county level. A final criticism of many culturalclassification schemes, including Elazar's,is their circularity.Thus, it is often alleged that Elazar'stypology relies, in part, on informationabout past politicalbehavior to predict currentor future politicalbe- havior. To get around this difficulty, Kincaid and I (1991) have proposed the developmentof new subculturalmeasures exclusively based on what Elazarhas called the "sources"of political culture such as racial origin, ethnic ancestry, religious affiliation, and social structure. This focus would exclude from the derivationof any new measuresthe confounding"manifestations" and "effects"of culture,i.e., politicalbehavior and institutionalarrangements. The purposeof this study is to develop and analyzea new measureof American subculturethat has these properties: 1. It is derivablefrom an explicit and replicableset of mathematicaland statistical algorithms. 890 Joel Lieske 2. It reflectscurrent cultural conditions. 3. It distinguishessubcultural differences down to the county level. 4. It is based entirelyon "nonpolitical"measures of Americanculture. To achievethese objectives,I will first discuss the theoreticallogic that undergirds my new measure. Next I will present the statisticalmethodology on which it is based. After this, I will discuss the distinguishing characteristicsof each sub- culture and relate my classificationscheme to the work of Elazar (1984), Gastil (1975), Garreau(1981), and Fischer (1989). Finally, since Elazar'stypology is the only one that has been subjectedto extensive empiricalanalysis, I will test the em- pirical utility of my new measurerelative to his. This will be done by comparing their relative ability to explain the variationin a number of social, political, and policy indicators. A MODELOF AMERICANREGIONAL SUBCULTURES As Kincaid and I (1991) argue elsewhere,1the peoples who settled the United States came with distinctive ethnoreligiousidentities, cultural preferences,and ways of life (Fischer 1989). In most cases, these traditions shaped both their choices of and responsesto the environment.Generally, groups settled in clusters, not as randomlydispersed individuals. And as they pushed inland, as in the west- ward migrationof British-Americansacross the entire continent, they took with them and transmitted to future generations the values, beliefs, attitudes, and behavior of their forebears(Holbrook 1950). Moreover, given the pervasiveness of local self-goverment that constituted the American democraticexperiment, groups could give significantsocial and politicalexpression to their culturalpref- erences within geographicallydefined political jurisdictions, namely, towns, town- ships, cities, and counties (Kincaid 1982). This gave an advantageto the early settlers who founded the first local and state governments(Zelinsky 1973; Gastil 1975). Unless they could numericallyoverwhelm these early settlers, laterarrivals had to contend with and adapt themselves to existing social and political power structures. Based on this historicalrecord, American subcultures should be dispersed,but not balkanized,across the countryin explicablepatterns or mosaicsthat are rooted in political jurisdictions.In addition, single subculturesor distinctive multicul-
Recommended publications
  • Cultural Distance, Perception of Emotional Display Rules, And
    CULTURAL DISTANCE, PERCEPTION OF EMOTIONAL DISPLAY RULES, AND THEIR INFLUENCE ON SOJOURNER ADJUSTMENT A thesis presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science Nicole L. Gullekson August 2007 2 This thesis titled CULTURAL DISTANCE, PERCEPTION OF EMOTIONAL DISPLAY RULES, AND THEIR INFLUENCE ON SOJOURNER ADJUSTMENT by NICOLE L. GULLEKSON has been approved for the Department of Psychology and the College of Arts and Sciences by ________________________________________________ Jeffrey B. Vancouver Associate Professor of Psychology ________________________________________________ Benjamin M. Ogles Dean, College of Arts and Sciences 3 Abstract GULLEKSON, NICOLE L., M.S., August 2007, Experimental Psychology CULTURAL DISTANCE, PERCEPTION OF EMOTIONAL DISPLAY RULES, AND THEIR INFLUENCE ON SOJOURNER ADJUSTMENT (109 pp.) With increased globalization, more individuals temporarily leave home to work and study in foreign countries. These sojourners are confronted with societal norms different from their home cultures. The present study investigated the extent to which international student sojourners perceive differences in emotional display norms between their home and host cultures, as well as the influence of such perception on adjustment. Although accurate perception of the host culture’s emotional display rules was not related to adjustment, a “guest” effect existed. Specifically, international student participants reported that one should
    [Show full text]
  • 10.7251/Her1115001g
    U UDC 911.3:930.85 PY F – W IKTIVFZN?K R ,1 1I , , W: + ++ . A (Sauer, 1925), + * (Géographie humaine). N – , + . H . ? \, # - . \* + , . : , , , , . Scienti[ c review paper CONCEPT OF CULTURAL GEOGRAPHY AS A SCIENCE Mirko Gr6i41 1Faculty of Geography at Belgrade University, Republic Serbia Abstract: Cultural geography was created as a reaction on geographic determinism and static descriptive approach in researching of the characteristics of cultural elements and forms distribution in classical anthropogeography. An American geographer Carl Sauer (1925) is considered to be its founder, although its aspects were present in Anthropogeography and Human geography (Géographie humaine) before. Even today, Cultural geography is de[ ned differently - as a strict science with its methodological apparatus, or as an aspect or way of looking in geography. Sauer has de[ ned this science in the spirit of possibilistic concept of geography of Paul Vidal de la Blache. In the spirit of this concept Jovan Cviji4’s Serbian anthropogeography school was developed, which also has expressive cultural-geographical aspect. The aim of this paper is to discuss issues of subject and methodological essence of Cultural geography in the light of different approaches and directions of development. Key words: Cultural geography, culturology, anthropogeography, cultural landscape, landshaft. ________________________________________________________________________________________________ HTJ INTRODUCTION V (. culture – #+, The word culture (lat. culture - cultivation, ) production) appeared in French language (XIII (XIII ), - century), followed by the words of a cultiva- – # * (agriculture, tor and cultivate - to cultivate the land (agri- civiculture, horticulture). X culture, civic culture, horticulture). It had to be „“ , .. - followed by “cultivating” the man, i.e. spiri- 1 NT ]NB MIRKO GR5I3 . H (XVIII tual culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Culture-Specific Patterns in the Prediction of Life Satisfaction: Roles of Emotion, Relationship Quality, and Self-Esteem
    10.1177/0146167203255986PERSONALITYKang et al. / CULTURE, AND SOCIAL EMOTION, PSYCHOLOGY AND LIFE BULLETIN SATISFACTION Culture-Specific Patterns in the Prediction of Life Satisfaction: Roles of Emotion, Relationship Quality, and Self-Esteem Sun-Mee Kang Phillip R. Shaver Stanley Sue University of California, Davis Kyung-Hwan Min Seoul National University Hauibin Jing Sun Yet–Sen University This study was conducted to explore the culture-specific roles of Smith, & Shao, 1995), such as differences in resources to emotion, relationship quality, and self-esteem in determining meet basic needs, upward or downward comparison life satisfaction. It was hypothesized that maintaining good among societies, and cultural differences in valuing per- interpersonal relationships would make individuals in sonal happiness. However, less attention has been paid collectivistic cultures not only feel good about their lives but also to another kind of cross-cultural difference: relative feel better about themselves. Furthermore, two emotion vari- importance of predictors that contribute to life ables—emotional expression and emotion differentiation—were satisfaction. proposed as possible determinants of relationship quality. It was Life satisfaction is a multifaceted construct that refers hypothesized that emotional expressiveness would be more impor- to one’s overall evaluation of life domains such as health, tant for maintaining good interpersonal relationships in indi- finances, job, self-esteem, and interpersonal relation- vidualistic societies but emotion differentiation would be more ships (Michalos, 1991). Societies differ in the emphasis important in collectivistic cultures. These hypotheses were tested they place on certain values and resources, so it seems with Euro-American, Asian American, Korean, and Chinese likely that the life satisfaction levels of members in vari- groups using multigroup analyses in a structural equation ous societies are influenced to different degrees by model.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Geography. Different Encounters, Encountering Difference
    DAG 50 001-140 9/4/08 18:39 Página 105 Doc. Anàl. Geogr. 50, 2007 105-120 Cultural geography. Different encounters, encountering difference Robyn Longhurst University of Waikato. Department of Geography, Tourism and Environmental Planning Private Bag 3105. Hamilton. New Zealand [email protected] Data de recepció: agost del 2007 Data d’acceptació definitiva: setembre del 2007 Abstract In the first half of this paper it is argued that cultural geography is a dynamic and diverse field that extends well beyond a single branch of human geography. The boundaries between it and other sub-disciplines are often blurred. People have «different» encounters with cul- tural geography depending on their sub-disciplinary convergences. People also have dif- ferent encounters with cultural geography depending on where they live and work. «Place matters» in the construction, production and representation of cultural geography. It takes different forms in different places. In the second half of the paper it is argued that as cul- tural geography continues to encounter «difference» in many guises, four possible future trends are likely: first, it is probable that there will be continued growth in cultural geog- raphy; second, there may be mounting recognition that cultural geography needs to be critical offering possibilities for radical critique and reflection; third, cultural geographers are likely to continue with their efforts to think about what, if anything, might lie beyond representation; and finally, cultural geographers are likely to deepen their reflections on the politics of knowledge production leading to more multi-language publishing practices in this area. Key words: bodies, critical approach, cultural geography, emotions, place.
    [Show full text]
  • Hoosiers and the American Story Chapter 3
    3 Pioneers and Politics “At this time was the expression first used ‘Root pig, or die.’ We rooted and lived and father said if we could only make a little and lay it out in land while land was only $1.25 an acre we would be making money fast.” — Andrew TenBrook, 1889 The pioneers who settled in Indiana had to work England states. Southerners tended to settle mostly in hard to feed, house, and clothe their families. Every- southern Indiana; the Mid-Atlantic people in central thing had to be built and made from scratch. They Indiana; the New Englanders in the northern regions. had to do as the pioneer Andrew TenBrook describes There were exceptions. Some New Englanders did above, “Root pig, or die.” This phrase, a common one settle in southern Indiana, for example. during the pioneer period, means one must work hard Pioneers filled up Indiana from south to north or suffer the consequences, and in the Indiana wilder- like a glass of water fills from bottom to top. The ness those consequences could be hunger. Luckily, the southerners came first, making homes along the frontier was a place of abundance, the land was rich, Ohio, Whitewater, and Wabash Rivers. By the 1820s the forests and rivers bountiful, and the pioneers people were moving to central Indiana, by the 1830s to knew how to gather nuts, plants, and fruits from the northern regions. The presence of Indians in the north forest; sow and reap crops; and profit when there and more difficult access delayed settlement there.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CULTURAL APPROACH in GEOGRAPHY: PRACTICES and NARRATIVES Paul CLAVAL University of Paris-Sorbonne, France
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by OpenstarTs THE CULTURAL APPROACH IN GEOGRAPHY: PRACTICES AND NARRATIVES Paul CLAVAL University of Paris-Sorbonne, France 1. Introduction What does the cultural approach offer to geography? In order to answer this question, we have carried out two types of analyses: 1- we examined the 90 communications presented duing the Conference of our Commission in Rio de Janeiro on 10-12 June 2003; 2- we compared recents books on cultural geography : those of Mike Crang (1998) for Britain, Giuliana Andreotti (1996-1997) and Adalberto Vallega (2003) for Italy, Boris Grésillon (2002) for France and Don Mitchell (2000) for the United States. The conceptions I have personally developed served as counterpoints in this analysis (Claval, 1995-2002). 2. Cultural geographers at work: the Conference of Rio de Janeiro The Conference of Rio de Janeiro dealt with The Historical Dimensions of the Relationships Between Space and Culture (Abreu M., 2003). Some colleagues explored directly the way culture shapes temporalities and spatialities. Most have chosen to start from the research they normally develop in order to show how culture imposes its marks on space and duration: their papers offer in an overview of the objects and practices of contemporary cultural geography. 2.1. Culture and the qualitative differenciation of space Some communications deal with: (i) the relations between human groups and the natural environment they live in; (ii) the significance they give to Cosmos, Earth and Life in this World through the religious beliefs they profess and the ceremonies and rituals they perform; (iii) the procedures of political regulation they mobilize.
    [Show full text]
  • Helton-Mayo Farm, Lawrence County, Indiana
    Indiana Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology 402 West Washington Street, Room W274 Indianapolis, IN 46204 317-232-1646 National Register of Historic Places – Sample Nomination Form Helton-Mayo Farm, Lawrence County, Indiana Rural properties typically include buildings and structures diverse in age, building materials, and use. Indiana farms were usually diversified operations that practiced a high degree of self- sufficiency. This photo of the Helton- Mayo Farm captures the overall layout of the farmstead. Don’t forget to give your application the big picture as well as the details! This nomination documents a southern Indiana farm that includes an early vernacular brick house, log barn, various special-use farm buildings, as well as a 1950 arched-roof dairy barn. The authors drew on census data, local histories, and evidence offered in the buildings themselves to explain how the property meets the National Register Criteria in the areas of agriculture, settlement and architecture. If you’re having trouble classifying the vernacular architecture of your farm, the Indiana Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology can help. The map provides the reader with a sense of the organization of the farm and helps define contributing (historic) from non- contributing (non-historic) buildings. Many internet services or county offices provide aerial mapping or other graphic mapping systems that can be used to prepare maps for properties with numerous support buildings. NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 10024-0018 (Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts.
    [Show full text]
  • Megaliths in the Upland South: Imposing Stones Of
    32 Journal of Alabama Archaeology [Vol. 56, No. 1, 2010] Roper, Donna C. Webb, Clarence 2007 The Origins and Expansion of the Central 1968 The Extent and Content of Poverty Point Plains Tradition. In Plains Village Farmers: Culture. American Antiquity 9:380-394. Bison-Hunting Farmers in the Central and 1977 The Poverty Point Culture. Geoscience and Northern Plains, edited by Stanley A. Ahler Man 17. School of Geoscience, Louisiana State and Marvin Kay, pp. 53-66. The University of University, Baton Rouge. MEGALITHS IN THE UPLAND SOUTH: Utah Press, Salt Lake City. Webb, William S. IMPOSING STONES OF UNCERTAIN FUNCTION Russo, Michael 1939 An Archaeological Survey of Wheeler Basin 1994 Why We Don’t Believe in Archaic on the Tennessee River in Northern Alabama. Donald B. Ball and John C. Waggoner, Jr. Ceremonial Mounds and Why We Should: The Smithsonian Institution Bureau of American Case From Florida. Southeastern Archaeology Ethnology, Bulletin 122. United States 43(2):93-108. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Saunders, Rebecca Webb, William S., and David L. DeJarnette 1994 The Case for Archaic Period Mounds 1942 An Archaeological Survey of Pickwick in Southeastern Louisiana. Southeastern Basin in the Adjacent Portions of the States Archaeology 43(2):118-138.: of Alabama, Mississippi and Tennessee. The term megalith (or menhir) is best known prehistory to record the Standing Stone which in association with large free standing stones once stood near the town of Monterey in Schambach, Frank F. Smithsonian Institution Bureau of American 1996 Mounds, Embankments, and Ceremonialism Ethnology, Bulletin 129. United States erected in the British Isles and portions of northeastern Putnam County, (north-central) in the Trans-Mississippi South.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Values Moderate Gender Stereotype Content
    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology © 2015 American Psychological Association 2015, Vol. 109, No. 4, 622–635 0022-3514/15/$12.00 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000027 Men as Cultural Ideals: Cultural Values Moderate Gender Stereotype Content Amy J. C. Cuddy and Elizabeth Baily Wolf Peter Glick Harvard Business School Lawrence University Susan Crotty Jihye Chong Zayed University Asian Center for Theological Studies and Mission, Korea Michael I. Norton Harvard Business School Four studies tested whether cultural values moderate the content of gender stereotypes, such that male stereotypes more closely align with core cultural values (specifically, individualism vs. collectivism) than do female stereotypes. In Studies 1 and 2, using different measures, Americans rated men as less collectivistic than women, whereas Koreans rated men as more collectivistic than women. In Study 3, bicultural Korean Americans who completed a survey in English about American targets rated men as less collectivistic than women, whereas those who completed the survey in Korean about Korean targets did not, demonstrating how cultural frames influence gender stereotype content. Study 4 established generalizability by reanalyzing Williams and Best’s (1990) cross-national gender stereotype data across 26 nations. National individualism–collectivism scores predicted viewing collectivistic traits as more— and individualistic traits as less—stereotypically masculine. Taken together, these data offer support for the cultural moderation of gender stereotypes hypothesis, qualifying past conclusions about the univer- sality of gender stereotype content. Keywords: gender stereotypes, stereotype content, culture, individualism, collectivism Men are stereotyped as self-oriented and women as other- cultures and individualistic (i.e., self-oriented) in individualistic oriented.
    [Show full text]
  • The South: the South's Sub-Regions the South
    4/28/2017 Regional Landscape Studies NORTHLANDS <<<For each region: NORTHEAST COAST Regional Landscapes of the 1. Know its physical MEGALOPOLIS United States and Canada CANADA’S NATIONAL CORE geography. AMERICA’S HEARTLAND 2. Identify its unique The South: APPALACHIA and the OZARKS characteristics. THE SOUTH Diverse Landscapes of 3. Be able to explain the PLAINS and PRAIRES human imprint. Southeastern North America MOUNTAINS and PLATEAUS DESERT SOUTHWEST 4. Discuss its sequence Prof. Anthony Grande NORTH PACIFIC COAST occupancy and eco- ©AFG 2017 HAWAII nomic development. Chapter 6 and parts of 4, 8, 13, 15 2 Vacation area Heat and humidity The South’s Sub-regions The South Growing cities Hurricanes When you think about this region, Southern cooking Major sub-regions: H E A R T L A N D what images come into your mind? Mississippi R delta Civil War • Atlantic Coastal Plain Plantations • Piedmont Beaches/ • Florida Peninsula resorts • Gulf Coastal Plain Bible Belt • Mississippi Delta 3 4 Overlapping Vernacular Other Vernacular Terms Regional Terms of the South Old South: area of the five southern plantation colonies Bible Belt: Coined by a Dixie: origin is uncertain. (MD, VA, NC, SC, GA). journalist during the 1925 Could be from French Deep South: area from South Carolina to east Texas, Tennessee vs Scopes Louisiana currency (dix = excluding peninsula Florida but including the Mississippi Delta region teaching-of-evolution trial. 10) or the Mason-Dixon Upland South: Piedmont and lower elevations of the A region whose people Line (area south of the line). Southern Appalachians. espouse religious o During the American Civil Mississippi Delta: ancient delta of Mississippi River, fundamentalism and War, the song “Dixie” extending S from the Ohio River confluence to the Gulf of Mexico the literal interpretation became the unofficial (not just the deltaic landform of Louisiana at mouth of Mississippi River) of the Bible.
    [Show full text]
  • Individualism and Collectivism in a Korean Population Diana D
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont Scripps Senior Theses Scripps Student Scholarship 2011 Individualism and Collectivism in a Korean Population Diana D. Ahn Scripps College Recommended Citation Ahn, Diana D., "Individualism and Collectivism in a Korean Population" (2011). Scripps Senior Theses. Paper 107. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/scripps_theses/107 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Scripps Student Scholarship at Scholarship @ Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scripps Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholarship @ Claremont. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Individualism and Collectivism 1 INDIVIDUALISM AND COLLECTIVISM IN A KOREAN POPULATION by DIANA D. AHN SUBMITTED TO SCRIPPS COLLEGE IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF ARTS PROFESSOR WALKER PROFESSOR ABDULLATIF DECEMBER 9, 2011 Individualism and Collectivism 2 Table of Contents APA Title Page ……..…………………………………………………..….………..………………… 3 Abstract ………………………………………………………………………….…..…….……… …….. 4 Introduction …………………………………………………………………..…..……….…………… 5 - Korean Culture……………………………………………………………..…...…………... 5 - Asian Americans: Korean Americans …………………………..…….…………….. 6 - Individualism-Collectivism and the INDCOL Measure…………....…………. 7 Method …………………………………………………………..………………………………… …...… 10 - Participants …...…………..……………………………………………………..…………... 10 Individualism and Collectivism 3 - Test Instrument…………………………………………………….…………….…...…….. 10 - Procedure……………………………………………………....…………………….…..
    [Show full text]
  • Re Ections on the 'Cultural Turn' in British Human Geography
    Norsk geogr. Tidsskr. Vol. 55, 166–172. Oslo. ISSN 0029-1951 Whatever happened to the social? Re ections on the ‘cultural turn’ in British human geography GILL VALENTINE Valentine, G. 2001. Whatever happened to the social? Re ections on the ‘cultural turn’ in British human geography. Norsk Geo- gra sk Tidsskrift–Norwegian Journal of Geography Vol. 55, 166–172. Oslo. ISSN 0029-1951. This paper focuses on the ‘cultural turn’ which has taken place in British and to a lesser extent North American and Australian human geography in the last decade. It begins by exploring what constitutes the cultural in what has been dubbed ‘new cultural geography’. It then explores contemporary claims that cultural geography has eclipsed or marginalised social geography. The nal section evaluates these claims about the demise of the social, arguing that the social has not been evacuated but rather has been rede ned. While this paper tells a speci c story about a particular tradition and geographical frame of reference, it nonetheless has wider relevance because it provides an example of the differential development of particular sub-disciplinar y areas, of the way sub- disciplinary knowledges shape each other, and of the way understanding s of disciplinar y trends are contested. Keywords: cultural turn, geographical thought, social Gill Valentine, Department of Geography, University of Shef eld, Winter Street, Shef eld, S10 2TN, UK. E-mail: G.Valentine@ shef eld.ac.uk Introduction dimensions. (Jackson 1989). Methodologically, Sauer was in uenced by anthropology, from which he derived a This paper focuses on the ‘cultural turn’ which has taken commitment to ethnographic eld research.
    [Show full text]