STUDY SESSION

TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Dan Poremba, John Voboril DEPARTMENT: Community Development DATE: May 4, 2020 SUBJECT: CityCenter Redevelopment Planning Progress with SKB

DESCRIPTION: CityCenter Redevelopment Planning Progress with SKB

RECOMMENDATION: This informational update to Council is provided in anticipation of a Predevelopment Agreement (PDA) between the same parties which is scheduled to be presented for Council consideration at the May 18, 2020 Regular City Council Meeting.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: On February 18, 2020, City Council approved by motion the execution of an Exclusive Negotiation Agreement (ENA) between the City/EEF and SKB of Portland, Oregon (also referred to as Scanlan Kemper Bard). Following a year-long, multi-step procurement process, the ENA reflected the selection of SKB as the preferred master developer partner with the City to redevelop the “City Property” at Englewood City Center. This is the property owned or controlled by the City and EEF, shown in blue on the attached site plan.

The City initiated exploration of the redevelopment of the City Property in connection with the August 2018 foreclosure of the three-square block former Weingarten Realty property at CityCenter, shown in red on the attached site plan. This led to the implementation of a master developer procurement process. Council has been briefed at key points throughout the process. As previously noted, the ENA is the first of three anticipated agreements between the City/EEF and SKB, each requiring Council review and approval.

SUMMARY: Council’s recent considerations regarding CityCenter redevelopment have included the following key points.

• CityCenter currently presents a dated and fading image and the need for redevelopment has been documented in multiple City-sponsored planning studies, and in two recent independent studies of the Urban Land Institute. • Englewood has a timely opportunity to guide the redevelopment of CityCenter to re- establish it as Englewood’s “central place” with a viable and sustainable future. Redevelopment can significantly improve CityCenter’s mix of uses, activity levels, walkability, financial sustainability, property values and contribution to City revenues. • Englewood is receiving no current income from its CityCenter property interests and redevelopment will enable the City to generate new revenues from these interests.

The specific factors that supported Englewood’s selection of SKB for the master developer role on the City Property included:

• SKB’s specific experience partnering with municipalities on complex, mixed-use and transit-oriented development (TOD) projects, including redevelopments, • Due to SKB’s continuing interest in also acquiring the former Weingarten property, the selection of SKB preserves the possibility that the City Property and former Weingarten • SKB demonstrated a commitment to the high level of public outreach the City requires.

ANALYSIS: Staff and SKB have been working through the various tasks outlined in the ENA, a copy of which is attached. Staff is pleased with SKB’s progress and the evolving relationship between the City and SKB. SKB has performed its obligations in a timely and partner-like manner, including its timely transfer of a $50,000 earnest money deposit to the City. Key tasks incorporated in the ENA include the following:

• SKB has become an important member of the Downtown Matters Steering Committee and, working with the City’s consulting team, is contributing its special districts expertise, • Working with City executive staff, SKB sponsored an initial space planning analysis of the Civic Center building to evaluate possibilities for the most efficient and cost-effective use of the building and to evaluate potential alternative locations for a new civic center building, • Working with their planning and architectural firm, Tryba Architects, SKB completed an evaluation of other similar transit-oriented developments currently in process in the Denver area (a summary of this Station Area Comparison Study is attached), • To formulate parking solutions, SKB retained Fehr & Peers, a national transportation engineering firm with experience working on other TOD projects involving RTD, • SKB and the City have met with RTD to begin to discuss ideas for rearranging and possibly reducing the shared RTD parking currently provided by the City, • SKB and staff have communicated with the current interim owner of the former Weingarten property (LNR Partners) to explore opportunities SKB acquiring the property or specific portions and to discuss general coordination matters.

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Collaborating with SKB to formulate a mutually acceptable redevelopment plan for the City Property at CityCenter will likely require that certain professional consultants’ fees be funded from the approved 2020 Community Development professional services budget. As previously approved by Council, EEF is funding related special counsel legal fees (up to $150,000 in 2020). These expenditures will allow Englewood to generate new net revenues and to protect and enhance property values, property taxes and sales taxes within and adjacent to CityCenter as the redevelopment proceeds.

CONCLUSION: Working with the City’s outside counsel, staff is finalizing a Predevelopment Agreement (PDA) between the City/EEF and SKB for EEF Board and Council review. The PDA is expected to be presented for Council consideration and at the May 18, 2020 Regular City Council Meeting. The PDA would govern the subsequent process of formulating a mutually-acceptable and definitive Master Development Agreement (MDA).

Subject to EEF Board and City Council approval, the MDA would then govern the parties’ long- term public/private partnership relationship. Subject to possible COVID-19 schedule impacts, the MDA could be completed by year-end 2020. These are the steps that are customarily undertaken by municipalities in structuring master development agreements.

ATTACHMENTS: CityCenter Site Plan (City Property in blue and the former Weingarten property in red) Exclusive Negotiation Agreement between the City/EEF and SKB Station Area Comparison Study

CityCenter Site Plan (City Property shown in blue and the former Weingarten property is shown in red (still labelled as the C-III Property)

/Former Weingarten Prop.

1

EXCLUSIVE NEGOTIATION AGREEMENT

This EXCLUSIVE NEGOTIATION AGREEMENT (this “ENA") is made and entered into this [_] day of February, 2020 (the “Effective Date”), by and between CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, a Colorado home—rule municipality (“Englewood”), ENGLEWOOD ENVIRONMENTAL FOUNDATION, a tax-exempt political subdivision of Englewood (“EEF” and collectively with Englewood, the “City”) and SCAN LANKEM PERBARD COMPANIES, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company (“Master Developer”). Englewood, EEF and Master Developer are sometimes hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Parties” and individually as a “Party.”

Recitals

A. City is pursuing a mixed-use, transit-oriented redevelopment project (the “Project”) on approximately 10.6 acres of property located adjacent to the Englewood light rail and multi—modaltransit station (the “Project Area"). The Project Area is identified on the map attached as Exhibit A hereto. The property that comprises the Project Area is owned or controlled by the City or EEF.

B. On March 28, 2019, City published a Request for Qualifications(“RFQ”) from interested master developers, and in response to the RFQ, Master Developer submitted its quali?cations for the Project.

C. On April 24, 2019, City published a Request for Proposals (“RFP”) from the respondents of the RFQ, and in response to the RFP, Master Developer submitted its proposal for the Project dated May 15, 2019.

D. Following additional procurement process steps, including multiple interviews and meetings participated in by senior City staff from multiple departments, City staff recommended Master Developer to the City Council as the preferred master developer for the Project. Based on City staffs recommendation, at its meeting on January 27, 2020, the City Council directed staff to prepare an exclusive negotiating agreement with Master Developer.

E. The Parties acknowledge that the purpose of this ENA is to enable the Parties to negotiate exclusively and proceed with the studies, due diligence and next steps necessary to establish the terms and conditions of a subsequent Preliminary Development Agreement (“PDA”) and a subsequent Master Development Agreement (“MDA”) that would facilitate development of the Project.

F. The Parties acknowledge that robust public outreach and communication conducted in collaboration with appropriate City staff will be necessary to understandthe needs and desires of the Englewood community and key stakeholders with regard to the Project.

I54‘; I20.4 G. The Parties desire to enter into this ENA upon the terms set forth below.

Agreement

NOW, THEREFORE, FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties mutually agree as follows:

1. Mutual Agreement to Negotiate Exclusively; Good Faith Negotiations

a. During the Negotiation Period (as de?ned in Section 2 below), Master Developer and City shall negotiate exclusively and in good faith with each other concerning the proposed development of the Project and the terms and conditions of the contemplated PDA and preliminary terms and conditions of the MDA.

b. Each Party shall use commercially reasonable efforts to attend scheduled meetings, direct its respective consultants to cooperate with the other Parties, to provide infonnation to the other Paities that may be necessaryto further completion of the PDA, and to promptly review and return with comments all correspondence, reports, documents, or agreements received from the other Parties that require such comments. The Parties shall establish weekly meetings to update each other and discuss progress on the tasks described in Section 3 below.

c. City and Master Developer shall use commercially reasonable efforts to ensure those staff, principals and consultants who each respective Party identi?es as authorized to speak responsibly and authoritatively for each Party participate in meetings and communications by and among the Parties.

d. The City will not negotiate with any other person or entity or investigate the feasibility of the development of a competing project similar to the Project as described in Master Developer’s RFP submittal for a portion of the Englewood CityCenter Redevelopment, dated May 15, 2019, within the City’s boundaries without Master Developer’s approval. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City shall be pennitted to negotiate with LNR regarding the sale and redevelopment of the LNR Property.

e. The Parties acknowledge their mutual desire to work cooperatively towards a successful redevelopment of Englewood CityCenter which will require Master Developer to be fully engaged and aligned with the City in achieving this outcome. Accordingly, prior to executing a letter of intent or any other written agreement related to the acquisition ofreal property intended for ground—upredevelopment (“Related Property”) located within the boundaries of the area described in Exhibit B (the “Related Area”), Master Developer will notify the City of its desire to acquire such Related Property and the parties will meet within five (5) days thereafter to confer about how and why redevelopment of the Related Property would further the parties‘ mutual redevelopment goals for the Project. If, within three (3) days after such conferral, the City notifies the Master Developer ofany good faith, commercially reasonable objection it has to the Master Developer’s acquisition and/or redevelopment of the Related Property, the Parties will

lb‘-I‘)|3l) -1 meet again within three (3) days thereafter to attempt to resolve the City’s objection. 1fthe Parties are unable to resolve the City’s objection and the Master Developer executes a letter of intent or other agreement related to such purchase and sale agreement for the acquisition and redevelopment of the Related Property and delivers notice to the City that it intends to proceed over the City’s objection, the City may temiinate this ENA By delivering to Master Developer written notice of such termination within ?ve business days following its receipt of notice from the Master Developer. If the Parties satisfactorily resolve the objection or the City does not timely object, then the Master Developer may independently pursue acquisition and redevelopment ofthe Related Property in the manner set forth in the notice. The Master Developer is not required to notify the City of its intent to acquire any real property either (1) located outside of the Related Area or (ii) not intended for ground-up redevelopment.

2. Period of Negotiations

a. The “Negotiation Period” for the PDA will commence on the Effective Date and terminate ninety (90) days after the Effective Date (the “Tennination Date”). Provided, however, ifon the ?nal day of the Negotiation Period, the Parties have not executed the PDA, but are nevertheless continuing to negotiate in good faith, then the Negotiation Period shall automatically extend for successive ?fteen (15) day periods, not to exceed two such ?fteen (15) day periods, until such time as the PDA is executed or one of the Parties terminates this ENA in accordance with Section 2(1))below. In addition, if on the final day of the Negotiation Period as the same may be extended, the Master Developer has executed the PDA and submitted it to the City for approval, this ENA shall not temiinate until the City Council either approves, executes and delivers the PDA to the Master Developer or rejects the PDA.

b. Any Party may terminate this ENA at any time following consultation with the other Parties and upon ?fteen (15) days’ notice, if such Party determines in its reasonable discretion that the other Party is not negotiating the PDA in good faith or ful?lling its obligations under this ENA. In addition.the Parties may mutually agree to terminate this ENA if they determine after consultation with each other, that the Project is not ?nancially feasible. Alternatively, this ENA shall automatically terminate if the City rejects the PDA as executed by the Master Developer. If this ENA is tenninated, the City shall return to Master Developer the Deposit described below in Section 3(b)(i).

c. The Parties contemplate the PDA will address the Parties’ obligations related to major development, entitlement, property acquisition and ?nancial matters, and will set the initial milestones necessary to advance the Project, including an appropriate public outreach component, all as further described herein. The PDA will provide the basis for the negotiation of the MDA and other agreements necessary to develop the Project.

|S~l‘)l2(.I.~l

DJ d. Unless the Parties otherwise agree in writing, any amounts expended by either Party during the Negotiation Period, other than the Deposit, shall be that Party’s expense and shall not be reimbursed by any other Party to this Agreement.

3. Performance During Negotiation Period. During the Negotiation Period, the Parties shall use good faith, commercially reasonable efforts to achieve the benchmarks set forth below. Unless otherwise provided. City shall perfonn City‘s Obligations at its sole cost and expense and Master Developer shall perform Master Developer’s Obligations at its sole cost and expense.

a. City Obligations

i. City will provide Master Developer with all relevant information regarding the Project and the Project Area in the City’s possession or control that will be useful to Master Developer in performing Master Developer's obligations under this Section 3. Without limitation, City will provide Master Developer and Master Developer’s consultants access to review the City’s project files related to the Project Area and to catalog and copy those materials as appropriate (the “City Materials”).

ii. Upon execution of an appropriate access agreement, City will allow Master Developer physical access to the Project Area, to enable Master Developer to perform its obligations under this Section 3.

iii. City will cooperate fully in providing the Master Developer with appropriate information and assistance to enable Master Developer to prepare the information and plans listed in Section 3(b) below.

iv. City will provide all GIS ?les relevant to the Project Area in its possession.

v. City will include a representative ofMaster Developer on the Englewood Downtown Matters Initiative Steering Committee.

b. Master Developer Obligations

i. Upon execution of this ENA, Master Developer shall deliver to Englewood a cash deposit (the “Deposit") in the amount of Fifty Thousand and 110/100 Dollars ($50,000.00). If the Parties agree to a PDA, the Deposit shall be applied to the deposit required in the PDA. Otherwise, the Deposit, shall be refunded to Master Developer in full within ten (10) days following termination ofthis ENA.

ii. Master Developer will commence an internal evaluation of the City Materials.

iii. Master Developerwill conduct an internal market evaluation for inulti-family residential, office and retail uses in the Project Area.

l‘H")l3U-I iv. Master Developer will authorize a third-party feasibility study for a hotel in the Project Area.

v. Master Developer will perform certain limited investigations with respect to the Project Area zoning and property ownership and such other studies as Master Developer deems necessary to determine whether to move forward with a PDA.

vi. Master Developer shall collaborate with the City in the development ofthe following preliminary plans and information that will be included in or inform the PDA and will form the basis for further negotiations regarding the Project:

a. A preliminary project vision plan outlining the uses, densities and phasing of the Project;

b. A preliminary evaluation of parking availability and needs associated with the Project, including the availability of parking within the existing Englewood Station parking structure;

c. An preliminary assessment ofideas for recon?guring the existing Civic Center parking garage to facilitate early mixed—usedevelopment on this parcel.

d. A preliminary project schedule which identifies at a minimum the anticipated timing for property acquisition, leasing/sales commitments, ?nancing. public and private improvement construction, and initial opening, which schedule shall be more developed and refined through the PDA and MDA processes;

e. A preliminary evaluation of public/private ?nancial opportunities;

f. A preliminary evaluation of potential occupants and uses for the Project and potential vertical developers for the various vertical components of the Project, especially the hotel;

g. A conceptual site development plan showing the location and general form of structures and improvements to be constructed to be further refined during the PDA process;

h. A conceptual parking plan outlining potential parking strategies for the Project;

i. A conceptual traf?c plan indicating the ?ow and circulation of traffic related to the Project and identifying necessary traffic improvements;

j. A preliminary understanding of the current utilities serving the Project Area, includingpotential modi?cations and/or improvements necessary to serve the Project;

|S~l9 l 3t).-I k. lnfonnation regarding high-level hard cost estimates, developmentschedule and possible economic impacts of Master Developer’s program.

1. An evaluation of the current Planned United Development (PUD) zoning of the Property and potential amendments to the PUD that may be required to facilitate redevelopment of the Project Area.

in. An evaluation of possible steps for unwinding EEF and converting EEF’s responsibilitiesto the Master Developer.

vii. Master Developer will work with the City to develop a preliminary ?nancing plan for the Project, which ?nancing pla.n shall include, but not be limited to, the Parties’ preliminary understanding of the public and private ?nancing component of the Project. Master Developer will provide information as required for preparation of such plan, including, but not limited to, such information regarding costs, development schedule and potential economic impacts of Master Deve1oper"s program as are reasonably identi?able based on the preliminary information contemplated in Section 3(vi) above.

viii. Master Developer shall share all information or reports with the City.

c. Joint Obligations

i. During their weekly meetings. the Parties will agree on expected dates for completing the tasks listed in this Section 3, which schedule may be updated from time to time.

ii. In coordination to develop a public outreach and involvement plan for the Project designed to engage the Englewood community and key stakeholders in a robust and meaningful way.

iii. The Parties will work together to engage in initial discussions with key stakeholders, including, without limitation, the purchaser of the LNR Property, RTD and Walmart.

iv. The Parties will frankly and honestly communicate concerning all meetings and discussions held concerning the Project.

v. The Parties will establish a regular meeting schedule and use their best efforts to meet on a regular basis and coordinate all activities.

vi. The Parties will develop a strategy to engage the Regional Transportation Authority on the Project.

vii. The Parties will prepare a detailed space plan and facility

6

li»l‘7|Z0-4 analysis pertaining to the City’s current utilization of the Civic Center building to identify opportunities for consolidating the City space and relocating some or all City functions to other locations within the CityCenter area.

viii. Any public announcements concerning the Project will be handled by the City unless otherwise agreed. No public announcement concerning the Master Developer, Project concept or potential tenants will be made without the mutual written consent of the Parties. All negotiations between the Parties under this ENA shall be con?dential to the extent pemiitted by law. Upon any termination ofthis ENA, no Party shall make any announcement or public comment of any kind that in any way is critical of or disparages any other Party. The terms of this Section 3(c)(viii) shall survive a termination of this ENA.

4. Terms and Conditions of the PDA and MDA. The Parties‘ respective rights and obligations relative to the Project shall be as initially set forth in the PDA, and more specifically defined in the MDA. Matters to be initially addressed in the PDA and further re?ned in the MDA (the feasibility of which are to be further examined, analyzed, discussed, and negotiated by the Parties) shall include, but not be limited to, the following:

a. A schedule related to the items set forth in Sections 3(a) and 3(b) above, with de?ned veri?able deliverables.

b. A marketing plan, which shall include, but not be limited to, the Parties’ obligations to jointly market the Project during construction and on—going operations.

c. The operational requirements related to the Project, which will include restrictions that will need to be contemplated during design and construction.

d. Master Developer’s responsibilities to work closely with the City and the public to re?ne the overall master plan for the Project.

e. A ?nancing strategy for the Project, including Project components, phasing and timing and other matters, including Master Developer‘s responsibility to attract appropiiate vertical developers for those components of the Project that Master Developer does not anticipate self—developing.

f. A strategy for acquisition and/or lease and potential disposition of the Property.

g. A process for obtaining appropriate zoning and other entitlements for the Project.

h. The memorialization ofthe City"s financial and public improvement commitments, including potential creation of a Downtown Development Authority (“DDA”).

1840l2U.-I i. An explanation of the process, timing and feasibility for using metropolitan districts to develop the Project.

j. An infrastructure phasing plan.

k. A Project marketing plan.

1. A overall governance plan for ‘operation of the Project, including without limitations, responsibilities for common area maintenance and design review.

5. Further Duties and Oblgations. Except as expressly provided herein, no Party shall have any obligations nor duties to another Party in the event the Parties fail for any reason to timely execute and deliver the PDA. Nothing herein shall be construed as a binding commitment by any Party to proceed with the Project.

6. Amendment; Attorneys’ Fees; Time. This ENA may not be amended except in writing signed by all of the Parties. If any Party brings an action or ?les a proceeding in connection with the enforcement of its respective rights or as a consequence of any breach by any other Party of its obligations hereunder, then the prevailing Party (as determined by the ofticiant of such action), in such action or proceeding shall be entitled to have its reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs and other out-of—pocketexpenditures paid by the losing Party. Time is oftlre essence in this ENA.

7. General. If any provision of this ENA is held invalid or unenforceable in accordance with its express terms in any legal proceeding, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect the validity and enforceability of any other part of this Agreement. Nothing contained in this ENA shall be deemed to constitute a joint venture or partnership relationship or any other arrangement, business, financial or otherwise, between City and Master Developer. This ENA shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State o'fColorado.

8. Remedies:Termination. Tennination of this ENA shall be the sole and exclusive remedy in the event of default. In the event of a default under this Agreement, any non-defaulting Party shall provide written notice (a “Default Notice") to the defaulting Party, and the defaulting Party will have fourteen (14) days from receipt of the Default Notice to cure the default. During such time period, the Parties will work diligently with one another to help mutually cure the default, including meeting at least two'(2) times to discuss and seek to resolve the issues associated with the Default Notice. If after such meetings and the end of such l4-day cure period, the Parties are unable to reach agreement regarding the subject default, any Party may terminate this ENA by written notice to the other Parties. In the event this ENA is terminated in accordance with this Section 8, City shall refund the Deposit to Master Developer.

9. Ownership of Work. Master Developer retains the ownership rights to all work materials created by Master Developer in the performance of its obligations under this ENA. If this ENA is terminated with no PDA being mutually executed and delivered to all Parties, provided (a) Master Developer has not temrirrated this ENA for the City’s 8

lS«l‘)lIO 4 failure to negotiate in good faith or (b) City has not failed to approve the PDA, execute and deliver it to the Master Developer, then Master Developer shall assign to City the Master Developer‘s rights to use information or plans contained in the work materials. Otherwise, the City shall have no right to such infonnation or plans contained in the work matenals.

lO. Notices. All notices required or permitted hereunder shall be in writing and shall be delivered in person or by email, by overnight courier, or by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, to such Party at its address shown below, or to any other place designated in writing by such Party:

Englewood / EEF: City of Englewood Mr. Daniel Poremba ChiefRedevelopment Officer Englewood Civic Center 1000 Englewood Parkway Englewood, Colorado 801 10 (720) 480-2139 dporemba@englewoodco. gov

With a copy to: Sarah Rockwell, Esq. Kaplan, Kirsch & Rockwell LLP 1675 Broadway, Suite 2300 Denver, CO 80202 (303) 825-7000 [email protected]

Master Developer: Todd Gooding, President John Olivier, Senior Vice President c/0 ScanlanKemperBard 222 SW Columbia Street, Suite 700 Portland, OR 97201 (503)552-3594 [email protected] [email protected]

With a copy to: Jim Johnson, Esq. Otten, Johnson, Robinson,Neff & Ragonetti, P.C. 950 Seventeenth Street, Suite 1600 Denver, CO 80202 (303) 825-8400 [email protected]

Any such notice shall be deemed received upon delivery, if delivered personally, one (1) day after delivery to the courier, if delivered by courier, and three (3) days after deposit into the United States mail, if delivered by registered or certi?ed mail.

IS-10120»! l 1. Assignment. This ENA and all rights and obligations of the Parties hereunder are personal to the Paities and may not be transferred or assigned without the prior written consent of the other Parties. Notwithstanding the foregoing, City hereby consents to Master Developer assigning its rights and obligations hereunder to a wholly owned subsidiary of Master Developer or to a new entity under the same ownership and control of Master Developer.

10

IN‘) Ill‘ -1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this ENA as ofthe Effective Date.

ENGLEWOOD: MASTER DEVELOPER:

CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO SCANLANKEMPERBARD ‘ COMPANIES, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company

By‘' %aa'o1s2m';Mayor ,

ATTEST: /\

By: -' ?épiifiéCarlile, City Clerk

ENGLEVVOOD ENVIRONMENTAL FOUNDATION

I

By:

Title:

11

I34‘) I20.4 EXHIBIT A

PROJECT AREA

The “Project Area” is depicted in blue. The LNR Property is depicted in red. The yellow boundary depicts the original Englewood CityCenter transit-oriented development proj ect.

12

1849120.-4 EXHIBIT B

RELATED AREA

1849I20.4 APRIL 2020 ENGLEWOOD CITYCENTER REDEVELOPMENT Station Area Comparison Study Station Area Comparison Introduction

- Transit Oriented Developments planned as catalysts for neighborhood investment

- Synergistic mix of land uses support placemaking

- Introduce density to activate open space and retail amenities

ENGLEWOOD CITYCENTER REDEVELOPMENT | STATION AREA COMPARISON STUDY | APRIL 2020 2 Transit Map

Olde Town Arvada Station

Alameda Station

Evans Station

Englewood Station

Oxford - City of Sheridan Station

Belleview Station Littleton - Downtown Station

LEGEND Station Area Included In Study

Subject - Englewood Station

Sky Ridge Station City of Englewood Boundary

ENGLEWOOD CITYCENTER REDEVELOPMENT | STATION AREA COMPARISON STUDY | APRIL 2020 3 AlamedaAlameda Station Area Plan – Land Station Use & Urban Design Denver, CO T ELATI

FOX S STATION ZONING ARCHER PL. I-1 General Industrial District

GALAPAGO ST Maximum Allowable Building Height: BAYAUD AVE. 2-5 2-5 ile Floors Floors 14 Stories M 1-4 1-4 2 1-4 / Floors Floors Floors 1-3 1-3 1 Floors Floors MAPLE AVE. ZONING SURROUNDING STATION 1-4 1-4 1-3 1-3 Floors Floors SANTA FE DR. Floors Floors B-1: Limited Business District

KALAMATH ST. CEDAR AVE. B-4: General Business District 1-4 1-3 1-3 CHERKOKEE ST. 1-4 Floors BANNOCK ST. Floors Floors Floors I-0: Light Industrial / Office District BYERS AVE. 1-4 ile I-1: General Industrial District M Floors /4 1-3 1-3 2-5 2-5 1 Floors Floors Floors Floors I-2: Heavy Industrial District ALAMEDA AVE. 1-3 2-6 2-6 2-6 2-8 2-5 Floors O-1: Open Space District Floors Floors Floors Floors Floors 5-14 R-1: Single-Unit Detached Dwellings 5-14 1-3 Floors Floors Floors 5-14 5-14 5-14 2-5 2-5 Floors Floors R-2: Multi-Unit Dwellings, Low Density 5-14 Floors Floors Floors 1-3 Floors Floors DAKOTA AVE. R-3: Multi-Unit Dwellings, High Density 5-14 Floors 5-14 SANTA FE DR. Floors 5-14 5-14 2-5 5-14 1 Floors Floors Floors T-MU-30: Transitional Mixed Use Floors Floor RTD S. LIPAN ST. Alameda 1-3 RTD Station ALASKA PL. Floors

5-14 5-14 5-14 2-5 Floors Floors Floors Floors S. GRANT ST. S. SHERMAN ST. S. LINCOLN ST. S. BROADWAY ST. ADOPTED STATION AREA PLAN VIRGINIA AVE. VIRGINIA AVE. Alameda Station Area Plan 5-14 5-14 2-5 Floors Floors Floors 1-3 5-14 Floors Floors

S. JASON ST. 5-14 5-14 2-5 Floors Floors Floors CENTER AVE. 5-14 Habitat CHEROKEE ST. 5-14 Alameda Station Park Floors Floors 2-5 5-14 Floors Floors 1-3 Floors EXPOSITION AVE. LEGEND: 2-5 Floors 5-14 5-14 Light Rail Station Floors Floors EXPOSITION AVE. 1-3 Light Rail Alignment INTERSTATE 25 Floors RTD RTD Parking Structure 2-8 1-3 Retail Floors Floors

Residential South Platte River

Office/Employment 2-5 Floors Educational OHIO AVE. PLATTE RIVER DR. Broadway Commercial .TS NORUH .TS Station Industrial/Employment

Parking Structure Vanderbilt Open Space/Plaza Park

Existing Building

Existing Parcel KENTUCKY AVE.

Picture 3.5 Building Heights Concept - In no case shall builcings exceed the Washington Park View Plane Ordinance BUILDING HEIGHT & LAND USE CONCEPT PLAN - ALAMEDA STATION AREA PLAN

ENGLEWOOD CITYCENTER REDEVELOPMENT | STATION AREA COMPARISON STUDY | APRIL 2020 4

18 Alameda Station Denver, CO

ALAMEDA AVE.

SANTA FE DR. CHEROKEE ST S BROADWAY BANNOCK ST

DAKOTA AVE

View looking north from Alameda Station - Denizen Apartments

Alameda Station INTERSTATE 25

WEST VIRGINIA AVE

View looking northwest from Alameda Ave & 0 125’ 250’ Cherokee St - Mason at Alameda Station

ENGLEWOOD CITYCENTER REDEVELOPMENT | STATION AREA COMPARISON STUDY | APRIL 2020 5 Evans Station Area Plan – Land Use and Urban Design

Ruby Hill Park Evans Station Area Plan – Land Use and Urban Design

Colorado Ave. Overland Golf ile Course m /2 1

Jewell Ave. Ruby Hill Park Evans Station Area Plan – Land Use and Urban Design Colorado Ave. Overland Golf ile ile Course m m 4 Asbury Ave. /2 / 1 Pasquinel’s 1 Landing Park P Jewell Ave. Huron St. Galapago St. Fox St. Huron St. Ruby Evans Ave. Hill Park

T Colorado Ave. Overland Golf le e i il Course m Asbury Ave. m /4 /2 Pasquinel’s 1 1 Landing Warren Ave.

Park River Platte South P

Jewell Ave. Huron St. Galapago St. Fox St. Huron St. Evans Station Area Plan – Land Use and Urban Design Evans Ave. S. Santa Fe Dr. Ili Ave. T Evans Station Denver,ile CO m Asbury Ave. /4 Pasquinel’s 1 Rosedale

Landing Warren Ave. South Platte River Platte South Park

Park Broadway Acoma St. Bannock St. Cherokee St. P STATION ZONINGDelaware St. Wesley Ave. Ruby

Hill Park Grant - Frontier Park I-MX-3: Industrial Mixed Use Huron St. Galapago St. Fox St. Huron St. Evans Ave. S. Santa Fe Dr. Maximum Allowable Building Height: Ili Ave. Colorado Ave. Harvard Gulch Park Overland Golf 1 - 8 Stories e T il Course Harvard Ave. m /2 1 ZONING SURROUNDING STATION Rosedale B-1: Limited Business District

Warren Ave. Park South Platte River Platte South Broadway Acoma St. Bannock St.

Cherokee St. B-4: General Business District Jewell Ave. Delaware St. Wesley Ave. I-0: Light Industrial / Office District Grant - Frontier Park I-1: General Industrial District

S. Santa Fe Dr.

Ili Ave. Harvard Gulch Park O-1: Open Space District ile Harvard Ave. m Asbury Ave. R-1: Single-Unit Detached Dwellings /4 Pasquinel’s 1 R-2: Multi-Unit Dwellings, Low Density Landing Park Rosedale P-1: Off-Street Parking District P LEGEND Park Broadway Acoma St. Bannock St. Cherokee St. Delaware St. Wesley Ave. CMU-10: Commercial Mixed Use District Mixed-Use - Main Street Mixed-Use - Employment T Transit Station Huron St. Galapago St. Fox St. Huron St. Evans Ave. CMU-30: Commercial Mixed Use District Grant - Frontier Park Plaza/Pedestrian Bridge Mixed-Use Residential Public / Quasi-PublicPUD: Planned Unit Development T Urban Residential Harvard Gulch Park Transit Plaza Station Tower/Vertical Pedestrian Connection Harvard Ave. Single Family-Duplex ADOPTEDBicycle/Pedestrian STATION Bridge AREA PLAN SW Corridor Warren Ave. Evans Station Area Plan South Platte River Platte South Single Family P Transit Parking Existing Parks LEGEND

Mixed-Use - Main Street Mixed-Use - Employment T Transit Station

0 200 400 800 1,200 S. Santa Fe Dr. Mixed-Use Residential Public / Quasi-Public Plaza/Pedestrian Bridge Feet Ili Ave. Urban Residential Figure 4.Transit Land Plaza Use Plan StationEvans Tower/Vertical Station Pedestrian Connection Single Family-Duplex Bicycle/Pedestrian Bridge SW Corridor Rosedale Park

Single Family Broadway P Transit Parking Existing Parks Acoma St. Bannock St. Cherokee St. LEGEND Delaware St. Wesley Ave.

T Mixed-Use - Main Street Grant - Frontier Park Mixed-Use - Employment Transit Station 13 0 200 400 800 1,200 Mixed-Use Residential Public / Quasi-Public Plaza/Pedestrian Bridge Feet Harvard Gulch Park Urban Residential Figure 4. Land UseTransit Plan Plaza Harvard Ave. Station Tower/Vertical Pedestrian Connection

Single Family-Duplex Bicycle/Pedestrian Bridge SW Corridor

Single Family P Transit Parking Existing Parks LAND USE CONCEPT PLAN - EVANS STATION AREA PLAN 13

0 200 400 800 1,200 Feet ENGLEWOOD CITYCENTER REDEVELOPMENT | STATION AREA COMPARISON STUDY | APRIL 2020 6 Figure 4. Land Use Plan

LEGEND

Mixed-Use - Main Street Mixed-Use - Employment T Transit Station 13 Mixed-Use Residential Public / Quasi-Public Plaza/Pedestrian Bridge

Urban Residential Transit Plaza Station Tower/Vertical Pedestrian Connection

Single Family-Duplex Bicycle/Pedestrian Bridge SW Corridor

Single Family P Transit Parking Existing Parks

0 200 400 800 1,200 Feet

Figure 4. Land Use Plan

13 Evans Station Denver, CO

W ASBURY AVE

EVANS AVE GALAPAGO ST ST FOX CHEROKEE ST BANNOCK ST ACOMA ST S BROADWAY SOUTH PLATTE RIVER

S SANTA FE DR FE SANTA S Evans View looking north from Delaware St and Station Warren Ave

WARREN AVE DELAWARE ST

W ILLIF AVE View looking east from Evans Station - Evans 0 125’ 250’ Station Loft Apartments

ENGLEWOOD CITYCENTER REDEVELOPMENT | STATION AREA COMPARISON STUDY | APRIL 2020 7 Oxford Station Area Neighborhood Map Oxford - City of Sheridan Station Englewood, CO Oxford Station Area Neighborhood Map Live Work STATION ZONINGShop Transit Station Area 1 Future Live-Work Housing 1 Meadow Gold 1 Future Live-Work Housing Live Work Maximum Allowable BuildingShop Height: 2 Future High Density Housing 2 Incubator Space/Future 2 Future Mixed Use 1 1 Future Live-Work Housing 1 MeadowCreative DistrictGold 32’ - 60’ FutureDevelopment Live-Work Housing 2 Live 2 WorkFuture High Density Housing 23 ShopIncubatorLight Industrial Space/Future Future Mixed Use 1 Future Live-Work Housing 1 Meadow Gold 1 FutureCreative Live-Work DistrictZONING Housing SURROUNDINGDevelopment STATION 4 Windsor Industries I-1: Light Industrial District 2 Future High Density Housing 2 Incubator Space/Future 23 FutureLight Industrial Mixed Use R-1-C: Residential Single-Unit Dwellings Creative District 4 DevelopmentWindsor Industries 3 Light Industrial R-1-A: Single Unit Residential District 4 WindsorLearn Industries Play R-2: Multi-UnitMove Dwellings, Low Density 1 Englewood Recreation Center 1 Englewood Recreation CenterMU-R-3: Mixed-UseBike/Ped Low Facilities Density Live WorkLearn ShopPlay Move 2 Maddox Early Childhood 2 Jason Park Residential/Bus RouteLimited Office District 1 Future Live-Work Housing 1 MeadowEnglewood Gold Recreation Center 1 FutureEnglewood Live-Work Recreation Housing Center Bike/Ped Facilities Education 3 Rotolo Park Light Rail 2 FutureLearn High Density Housing 2 IncubatorMaddoxPlay Space/Future Early Childhood 2 FutureMoveJason ParkMixed Use Bus Route ADOPTED STATIONOxford AREA Station PLAN 1 Englewood Recreation Center 1 CreativeEducationEnglewood District Recreation Center 3 DevelopmentBike/PedRotolo Park Facilities EnglewoodLight Forward: Rail Comprehensive Existing Trails 1/4 & 1/2 Mile Station Areas 2 Maddox Early Childhood 23 LightJason Industrial Park Bus Route Plan Live Live Work Work Shop Shop Proposed Trails Oxford Station 1 1 Education 143 WindsorRotolo Park Industries LightExisting Rail Trails Future Live-Work Housing1 Future Live-WorkMeadow Housing Gold 1 Meadow GoldFuture Live-Work Housing1 Future Live-Work Housing 1/4 & 1/2 Mile Station Areas 2 2 OxfordProposed Station Trails 2 Future High Density Housing2 Future HighIncubator Density Housing Space/Future2 Incubator Space/FutureFuture Mixed Use 2 Future Mixed Use Creative District DevelopmentExisting Trails Live Work CreativeCatalytic DistrictShop Activity Development1/4 & 1/2 Mile Station Areas 3 Light Industrial 3 Proposed Trails 1 Future Live-Work Housing 1 MeadowLearn Gold Light Industrial1• FutureEncouragePlay Live-Work a Creative Housing Cluster, north ofMove Oxford Street/Meadow Gold, of small-to mid-sized industrial flex 41 Windsor Industries Catalytic Activity 2 Future High Density Housing 2 IncubatorEnglewood Space/Future Recreation4 Center Windsor21 IndustriesFutureandEnglewood start-up Mixed Recreationspace, Use possibly Center an artisanBike/Ped manufacture Facilities niche. 2 CreativeMaddox District Early Childhood 2• EncourageDevelopment₀Jason Special Park branding– a Creative toCluster, tie into north the Meadow ofBus Oxford Route Gold Street/Meadow facility; milk towers Gold, of anchor small-to the mid-sized southern viewshed.industrial flex Catalytic Activity and start-up space, possibly an artisan manufacture niche. 3 LightEducation Industrial 3 ₀Rotolo Vertical Park mixed use with residential onLight upper Rail floors could be phased in over time through the • Encourage a Creative Cluster, north of₀ OxfordSpecial Street/Meadow branding– to tie Gold, into theof small-to Meadow mid-sized Gold facility; industrial milk towers flex anchor the southern viewshed. Learn Learn4 WindsorPlay Industries Play Move implementation of a TransportationMove Oxford Overlay Station that would allow residential uses. General vehicle repair and start-up space, possibly an artisan₀ manufactureVerticaluses might mixed be niche. usephased with out residential over time, on butupper custom floors and could specialty be phased work incontinued. over time through the 1 Englewood Recreation Center 1 Englewood Recreation Center Bike/PedExisting Trails Facilities 1/4 & 1/2 Mile Station Areas 1 Englewood₀ RecreationSpecial branding– Center to1 tie Englewoodinto the Meadow Recreationimplementation Gold facility;Center of milk a Transportation towersBike/Ped anchor Facilities Overlay the southern that would viewshed. allow residential uses. General vehicle repair ₀Proposed Add pedestrian Trails scale lighting and prohibit razor wire to create an inviting character. 2 Maddox Early Childhood2 Maddox 2 EarlyJason Park Childhood 2 Jason Park Bususes Route might be phased outBus over Route time, but custom and specialty work continued. Education ₀ Vertical mixed use with residential ₀on Reviseupper floorszoning withcould a TODbe phased overlay in zone.over time through the Learn Education3 PlayRotoloimplementation Park of a3 TransportationRotolo Park₀MoveLight OverlayAdd Rail pedestrian that would scale allow lightingLight residential Rail and prohibit uses. General razor wire vehicle to create repair an inviting character. • Encourage transit oriented housing and mixed-use redevelopment Oxforddirectly Station south of Oxford at Navajo to uses might be phased out over time, but custom and specialty work continued. 1 Englewood Recreation Center 1 Englewood Recreation Center ₀supportBike/PedOxford Revise Station the zoning Facilities light withrail station. a TODOxford overlay Station zone. Catalytic₀Existing Add pedestrian Trails Activity scale lightingExisting and Trails prohibit razor wire to create an inviting character. 2 Maddox Early Childhood 2 Jason Park • Encourage₀Bus1/4 Larger &Route 1/2 sitesMile transit Stationsouth oriented of Areas Oxford1/4 housing & offer1/2 andMile valuable mixed-use Station opportunity Areas redevelopment for larger directlyscale users south and of Oxfordsubdivision at Navajo of these to • EncourageProposed Trailsa Creative Cluster, north of Oxford Street/Meadow Gold, of small-to mid-sized industrial flex Education 3 ₀Rotolo Revise Park zoning with a TODProposed overlay zone.TrailssupportLightshould Rail the not light be railsupported. station. and start-up space, possibly an artisan manufacture niche. • Encourage transit oriented housing and₀₀Oxford LargerConversionmixed-use Station sites redevelopmentfromsouth industrial of Oxford to directlyoffer mixed valuable southuse can of opportunity Oxfordbe expected at Navajo for tolarger generate to scale property users and tax subdivision increment, of these support₀ Special the branding– light rail station. to tie into the Meadowshouldpossibly Gold not some facility; be supported. sales milk tax towers increment. anchor the southern viewshed. CityExisting Limit Trails 1/4Catalytic & 1/2 Mile Activity Station Areas ₀ Vertical mixed use with residential ₀on Conversion upper floors from could industrial be phased to mixed in over use time can throughbe expected the to generate property tax increment, Catalytic ActivityCatalytic Activity100-Year₀Proposed Larger Floodplainsites Trails south of Oxford offer• EncouragevaluableMixed-Use opportunity a Transitionfinancing for Arealargerdistrict forscale large users0’ properties and500’ subdivision 1,000’south of ofthe these 2,000’station such as General Improvement implementation of a Transportation Overlaypossibly that some would sales allow tax residentialincrement. uses. General vehicle repair • Encourage a Creative Cluster, north of Oxfordshould Street/Meadow not be supported. Gold, of small-toDistrict mid-sized or Urban industrialRenewal flexDistrict. • Encourage 500-Yeara Creativeuses might Floodplain Cluster, be phased north of out Oxford over time,Street/Meadow but custom Gold,and specialty of small-to work mid-sized continued. industrial flex • EncourageResidential a Transitionfinancing Areadistrict for large properties south of the station such as General Improvement and start-up space, possiblyand an start-up artisan₀ space,manufactureConversion possibly from niche. an industrialartisan manufacture to mixed• Enhance use niche. can bike-ped be expected linkages to generate to Englewood property CityCenter, tax increment, Downtown and the Medical District. Additionally, ₀ possiblyAdd pedestrian some sales scale tax lighting increment. and prohibitDistrictenhanceAreas or ofrazor Oxford UrbanStability wire RenewalAvenue to create as District. an invitingeast-west character. corridor to connect nearby neighborhoods to the Oxford NEIGHBORHOODCity Limit PLAN - ENGLEWOODCatalytic₀ Special Activity branding– FORWARD to tie₀ intoSpecial the Meadow branding– Gold to tiefacility; into themilk Meadow towers anchor Gold facility; the southern milk towers viewshed. anchor the southern viewshed. Catalytic Activity ₀ Revise zoning with a TOD overlay• zone.EnhanceStation. bike-ped linkages to Englewood CityCenter, Downtown and the Medical District. Additionally, COMPREHENSIVE100-Year Floodplain PLAN 2016 ₀ Vertical mixed use with residential0’ • Encourageon500’ upper1,000’ floors a financing could2,000’ bedistrict phased for largein overFuture properties time Opportunity through south the of the station such as General Improvement Mixed-Use• Encourage Transition a Creative Area Cluster,₀ Vertical north ofmixed Oxford use Street/Meadow with residential Gold,on upper of small-to floorsenhance mid-sizedcould Oxford be phased industrialAvenue in as flexover an timeeast-west through corridor the to connect nearby neighborhoods to the Oxford implementation of a TransportationThis• mapEncourageDistrict Overlay is for orillustrative thatUrban transit would purposesRenewal oriented allow only. District. residentialhousing The location and uses. mixed-use and General extent of redevelopmentvehicle the map repair elements directly may change south as of plans Oxford are updatedat Navajo and to maps 500-Year Floodplain and start-up space, possibly implementationan artisan manufacture of a Transportation niche. Overlay thatStation. would allow residential uses. General vehicle repair Residentialuses Transition might be phasedArea out overare • time,amended Enhancesupport but (minorcustom the bike-ped lightamendments) and rail linkagesspecialty station. to depict to work Englewood the continued. most current CityCenter, adopted Downtown projects. and the Medical District. Additionally, ENGLEWOOD CITYCENTER REDEVELOPMENT | STATION AREA COMPARISONuses might beSTUDY phased | APRIL out over 2020 time, but custom and specialty work continued. 8 Areas₀ ofSpecial Stability branding– to tie into the Meadow₀enhance Larger Gold Oxfordsites facility; south Avenue milk of Oxford towersas an east-westoffer anchor valuable the corridor southern opportunity to connectviewshed. for nearbylarger scaleneighborhoods users and tosubdivision the Oxford of these ₀ Add pedestrian scale lighting₀ Add 3-16andpedestrian prohibit scale razor lightingwire to createand prohibit an inviting razor character.wire to createENGLEWOOD an inviting FORWARD: character. 2016 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Future₀ OpportunityVertical mixed use with residential Station.on shouldupper floorsnot be couldsupported. be phased in over time through the ₀ Revise zoning with a TOD₀ Reviseoverlay zoning zone. with a TOD overlay zone. DECEMBER 2016 3-17 implementation of a Transportation₀ OverlayConversion that would from industrial allow residential to mixed uses. use Generalcan be expected vehicle repair to generate property tax increment, This map is for illustrative purposes only. The location• and Encourage extent of the transit map elements oriented may housing change and as plansmixed-use are updated redevelopment and maps directly south of Oxford at Navajo to are amended (minor amendments) to depict the most currentuses adopted might projects. be phased • outEncourage over time, transit butpossibly customoriented some and housing sales specialty tax and increment. workmixed-use continued. redevelopment directly south of Oxford at Navajo to support the light rail station.support the light rail station. DECEMBER 2016 3-17 ₀ Add pedestrian scale lighting and• prohibitEncourage razor a wirefinancing to create district an invitingfor large character. properties south of the station such as General Improvement 3-16 ₀ LargerENGLEWOOD sites south FORWARD: of Oxford offer 2016 valuableCOMPREHENSIVE opportunity PLANfor larger scale users and subdivision of these ₀ Revise zoning with a TOD₀ Largeroverlay sites zone.District south or ofUrban Oxford Renewal offer valuableDistrict. opportunity for larger scale users and subdivision of these should not be supported. should not beDECEMBER supported. 2016 3-17 • Encourage transit oriented housing• andEnhance mixed-use bike-ped redevelopment linkages to directlyEnglewood south CityCenter, of Oxford Downtownat Navajo to and the Medical District. Additionally, ₀ Conversion from industrial to mixed use can be expected to generate property tax increment, support the light rail station.₀ Conversionenhance from industrial Oxford Avenue to mixed as usean east-west can be expected corridor toto generateconnect nearbyproperty neighborhoods tax increment, to the Oxford possibly some sales tax increment. possibly Station.some sales tax increment. ₀ Larger sites south of Oxford offer valuable opportunity for larger scale users and subdivision of these • Encourage a financing district for large properties south of the station such as General Improvement should not be supported.• Encourage a financing district for large properties south of the station such as General Improvement District or Urban Renewal DistrictDistrict. or Urban Renewal District. ₀ Conversion from industrial to mixed use can be expected to generate property tax increment, • Enhance bike-ped linkages to Englewood CityCenter, Downtown and the Medical District. Additionally, possibly some sales •tax Enhance increment. bike-ped linkages to Englewood CityCenter, Downtown and the Medical District. Additionally, enhance Oxford Avenue asenhance an east-west Oxford corridor Avenue to as connect an east-west nearby corridor neighborhoods to connect to nearbythe Oxford neighborhoods to the Oxford • EncourageStation. a financing districtStation. for large propertiesDECEMBER south 2016 of the station such as General Improvement 3-17 District or Urban Renewal District. • Enhance bike-ped linkages to Englewood CityCenter, Downtown and the Medical District. Additionally, enhance Oxford Avenue as an east-west corridor to connect nearby neighborhoods to the Oxford Station. DECEMBER 2016 DECEMBER 2016 3-17 3-17

DECEMBER 2016 3-17

Oxford - City of Sheridan Station Denver, CO

WINDMERE ST WINDMERE S SANTA FE DR FE SANTA S

NASSAU AVE KALAMATH ST Oxford Station

W OXFORD AVE W OXFORD AVE View looking south from Oxford Ave and

Navajo St - Oxford Station Apartments RIVER POINT PKWY POINT RIVER NAVAJO ST LIPAN ST JASON ST

JASON PARK

View looking south on Windmere St at Oxford 0 125’ 250’ Station

ENGLEWOOD CITYCENTER REDEVELOPMENT | STATION AREA COMPARISON STUDY | APRIL 2020 9 Littleton Downtown Station Littleton, CO

STATION ZONING CA: Central Area Multiple Use District Maximum Allowable Building Height: 40’

ZONING SURROUNDING STATION B-2: Community Business District PD-C: Planned Development District (B-2) T: Transitional District R-1: Residential Single-Family, Low Density R-3: Residential Single-Family, Med Density R-5: Multiple-Family Zone

ADOPTED STATION AREA PLAN Adopted Littleton Comprehensive Plan

Littleton Station

ZONING MAP

ENGLEWOOD CITYCENTER REDEVELOPMENT | STATION AREA COMPARISON STUDY | APRIL 2020 10

Littleton Downtown Station Littleton, CO S SANTA FE DR FE SANTA S

POWERS AVE SYCAMORE ST

S COURT PL

RIO GRANDE AVE

LITTLETON MAIN ST

LITTLETON BLVD BEMIS ST SPORTSWOOD ST PRESCOTT ST

W ALAMO AVE Littleton Downtown LILLEY AVE View looking east from Littleton Blvd & Court Station Pl

LITTLE CREEK TRAIL PRINCE ST

IDA AVE

CHURCH AVE

View looking north from Sycamore St 0 125’ 250’

ENGLEWOOD CITYCENTER REDEVELOPMENT | STATION AREA COMPARISON STUDY | APRIL 2020 11 Land Owner Master Developer RidgeGate Investments, Inc. RIDGEGATE, 5th Amendment Coventry Development Corp. – Colorado c/o Coventry Development Corporation 10270 Commonwealth Street, Suite B 70 E 55th Street (an amendment to the PDD formerly known as RidgeGate, 4th Amendment, approved by the City of Lone Tree, and recorded at 2011038124 on June 23, 2011) Lone Tree, Colorado 80124 New York, NY 10022 Sections 13, 14, 15, 22, 23, 24 and a portion of Section 21, Township 6 South, Range 67 West of the 6th Principal Meridian City of Lone Tree, State of Colorado (3,515 Acres) Project ZR17-56 Planned Development District PLANNING CONCEPT PLANNING FRAMEWORK Sky Ridge Station Lone Tree, CO RidgeGate is envisioned as an example for smart growth along Colorado's Front Range. It City Center Planning Area locates an integrated community of housing, employment and services immediately adja- The City Center Planning Area is a mixed-use urban neighborhood. It arranges residential cent to existing urban development. The property consists of approximately 3,515 acres and commercial uses, hotel, office and retail, relative to a centrally located intermodal trans- STATION ZONING and is located in northern Douglas County. RidgeGate's position at the natural edge of the portation facility. The City Center is sited at a knoll that affords visibility from I-25 and views Zone 1 CC: City LegendCenter District metro-Denver area and its adjacency to existing surface and planned light-rail transportation 40' Average Height limitation (3 to the Front Range. It is adjacent to one of the RidgeGate's major open space systems story), excluding 14' mechanical Maximum Allowable Building Height: systems creates a unique set of circumstances and opportunities. overruns, parapets and special Planning Areas to provide easy access and establish the relationship of "a city in a landscape". The City roof features. 1 - 8 Stories

RidgeGate's development framework builds on this locational advantage to create a series Center Planning Area is intended to create an urbanized environment with buildings at the Zone 2 SKY 70' Average Height limitation (5 RIDGE Rural Residential of planning areas - relatively concentrated, efficient mixed-use neighborhoods that help to edges of sidewalks, on-street and structured parking, an interconnected street network and TRANSIT ZONING SURROUNDING STATION story), excluding 14' mechanical STATION (RR) reduce the cost of infrastructure, services and transportation. These neighborhoods are a commitment to high quality and functional public spaces. It is also envisioned that this overruns, parapets and special 1/8 mile C-MU: Commercial Mixed Use District area will be home to City of Lone Tree municipal offices, government offices and a range roof features. clustered within a quarter mile walking radius around a "centerpiece" (a neighborhood retail R-MU: ResidentialResidential Mixed Use Mixed District Use center, a park, a school or other similar centers of neighborhood activity.) These center- of cultural facilities. Office and other non-residential components will be required to meet Zone 3 145' Average Height limitation OS: Open Space(R/M-U) District pieces allow for connections with a shuttle system and bicycle trails while neighborhood Design Standards that support the character and intensity required to create a vibrant urban (11 story), excluding 14' me- LONE TREE environment. Residential components are expected to be of a higher density with only limited chanical overruns, parapets and CITY CENTER street systems are designed to create an interconnected web of routes between destinations special roof features. TRANSIT STATION Commercial Mixed Use thereby minimizing traffic concentration. single-family detached homes allowed. The Subarea plan for the City Center will include ADOPTED STATION AREA(C/M-U) PLAN Zone 4 1/8 mile standards and criteria to promote a balance of mixed uses considering but not limited to Lone Tree Comprehensive Plan, 2019 The City Center Planning Area is a compact, pedestrian oriented and mixed-use environ- 175' Average Height limitation ranges of percentages of various land uses. (12 story), excluding 14' me- City Center ment providing a wealth of choice for retail, business, civic, cultural and residential uses as chanical overruns, parapets and (C/C) special roof features, with allow- well as an anchor for the community. It is home to a multi-modal transportation center that Commercial/ Mixed Use Planning Area ance for up to 10 buildings with further supports the area as a center of activity. 25,000 s.f. maximum footprint at Open Space The Mixed Commercial/ Mixed Use Planning Areas are mixed use neighborhoods with an up to 250' height limit (20 story). (OS) The Planning Areas have distinct edges defined by an open space system that also serves emphasis on commercial uses. They arrange residential, office and retail uses around a View Corridors to protect sensitive watersheds and habitat and provide a framework for an integrated trail central focus like public spaces and buildings that are generally within walking distance to 1,2,4: External Views Institutional the edge of the area. The Commercial/ Mixed Use Planning Areas are intended to create a 2,3,4: Internal Views system. This open space system also serves to maintain distinct community separation Site Planning Criteria, to be from the City of Castle Pines east of I-25 and from open lands in Northern Douglas County. balanced mix of uses in a pedestrian friendly environment with an interconnected street developed with Detailed Plans, will organize Open Space and network and multiple connections to open space systems that define edges of the district. surface parking along these Individual Sub-Area Plans and related Design Guidelines will be developed prior to or con- Residential components are expected to be of a higher density and will buffer themselves corridors and require adjacent buildings to be stepped. current with platting. Sub-Area Plans may include complete or partial planning areas, or from adjacent non-residential components. It is expected that some residential components a combination of multiple planning areas. These will serve to further define development may be located on floors above non-residential uses and other creative approaches of hous- standards that allow for flexibility to respond to market conditions yet provides specificity ing densities and styles will be encouraged. so that development implements the planning concepts. If there is any conflict in provi- 1/8 mile RidgeGate sions between the PDD and the Sub-Area Plans and Design Guidelines, the provision which PARKWAY Residential/ Mixed Use Planning Area TRANSIT is the most restrictive or imposes higher standards or requirements shall govern, unless STATION The Residential/ Mixed Use Planning Areas are mixed use neighborhoods with an emphasis determined otherwise by the City of Lone Tree Director of Community Development (the on residential uses. They arrange residential, office and retail uses around a central focus planning area "Director," as referred to in the City of Lone Tree's Planned Development District Ordinance like public spaces and buildings that are generally within walking distance to the edge of the designation General Provisions), in consultation with the City Council. area. The Residential/ Mixed Use Planning Areas are intended to create a balanced mix of parcel gross The following process of planning approval shall be applied: uses in a pedestrian friendly environment with an interconnected street network and multiple # acreage connections to open space systems that define edges of the district. Residential compo- The PD shall provide the framework for development, including permitted/prohibited land Note: Topographic nents are expected to reflect a range of densities with attached and detached housing styles uses. Interval is 20 feet encouraged through creative planning that minimizes streets with garages or parking areas. Following this shall be the development of Sub-Area Plans, which may be accompanied by Non-residential components will be connected to but appropriately transitioned from single family detached residential components and will not be located on residential level local and reviewed concurrently with subdivision platting and site improvement plans. Otherwise, Sky Ridge Station subdivision platting and site improvement plans shall follow the development of Sub-Area streets, unless appropriate and as determined by the Director. Multi-family residential (at- Plans and in all cases shall be consistent with them. tached residential units in excess of three stories or more in height) will be limited to certain percentages of some Planning Areas, as referenced on Sheet 4 of the PDD. ZONING MAP Sub-Area Plan Content • Conceptual Major Street Layout R/MU Parcel #11 • Conceptual location of elementary schools, as applicable The Detailed Plan for R/MU parcel #11, will provide for the reconfiguration of the southern ENGLEWOOD CITYCENTER REDEVELOPMENT | STATION AREA COMPARISON STUDY | APRIL 2020 12 • Conceptual location of other lands to be dedicated for public purposes, as portion of that parcel, surrounded by the bluffs, to allow for its shifting to the northern half of stated in the project commitments, as applicable the valley area, thereby preserving the middle and southern area. It is recognized that such • Conceptual location of parks, trails and the delineation/refinement of open shifting may entail development on slopes exceeding 20 percent in this particular parcel (ir- space areas respective of previous references indicating that slopes greater than 20% would be in open Major circulation elements shown are conceptual in nature • Specific land use framework. Otherwise, land uses shall be in accord with the space), in which case appropriate mitigation measures for development shall be employed. and subject to modification and refinement. PDD's matrix of planning areas and uses. The Sub-Area Plan for this parcel will be prepared in consultation with the Division of Wildlife. Planning area map Additional requirements in this area may involve the maintenance of natural vegetation and Not to scale • Setbacks may be established, or deferred to individual plats or site improve- restricted landscaping through building envelopes and the consideration of a regional trail ment plans. Circulation Elements Transit Station legend connection through the area. Subsequent Sub-Area Plans and Design Guidelines will con- • Conceptual design features to promote effective transit, through enactment of RidgeGate will provide an interconnected system of circulation elements to distribute, not sider alternative residential development design, including reduced street width, common concentrate traffic, and to offer choices in transportation methods and routes. Emphasis standards including modal splits and usage enhancement features (i.e. trans- open areas, and a mix of housing types. Design Guidelines shall also incorporate common Sky Ridge Station is placed on connecting neighborhoods and individual uses with each other by employing portation demand management, park-n-rides, bus turn-out lanes, etc.). building materials and a palette of building colors for homes in this area. Low profile and RidgeGate a modified urban grid form with a hierarchy of through streets, and sharing access drives In-line mixed-use/neighborhood station with a mix of uses stair-stepped buildings will be considered in the Design Guidelines for the Sub-Area Plans Note: "Conceptual" shall mean preliminary, to be refined at subdivision and site plan stag- between projects. Gated residential communities are not in keeping with interconnectedness and pedestrian connections to the adjacent medical center. of areas that are located along the toes of the bluffs, in order to conform to the topography. es of review. and public access and are generally discouraged, except in locations where neighborhood This station is within walking distance to adjacent neighbor- interconnectivity is prohibited by topography. hoods and features a Kiss-and-Ride drop off for RTD and Design Guideline Content Rural Residential Planning Area other shuttle services. • Site Planning Criteria The Rural Residential Planning Area is a residential neighborhood set back from the top of Circulation elements are endowed with two attributes-capacity and character. Capacity re- • Transportation, Streetscape and Parking Criteria the mesas in the southwest portion of the community. Due to their abrupt rise in elevation fers to the number of vehicles that can move safely through a segment within a given time. and the expansive views to the west and northwest, these mesas are a visually dominant It is physically manifested by numbers of lanes, their width, horizontal and vertical radii and • Architectural Criteria Lone Tree City Center Station • Landscape Architectural Criteria landscape feature and regional landform. Therefore, development of these areas is guided superelevation. Character refers to suitability for pedestrian activities and a variety of build- ing types. Character is physically manifested through building setback proximity, landscape • Lighting Criteria by standards intended to preserve visual character from I-25. Homes located in the Rural In-line urban station with high density mixed-use commer- conditions and sidewalk locations. cial, office retail and residential. • Signage Criteria Residential Planning Area may be arranged in a clustered pattern, or utilize other techniques such as restricted building envelopes and fencing restrictions to provide for continuous ar- The RidgeGate West Village Street Standards are the RidgeGate East Technical Supplement Sub-Area Plan Approval Process eas of natural open space, with the objective of preserving views and maintaining areas for define a range of road categories and their related technical details and criteria for imple- wildlife habitat and movement. RidgeGate Parkway Station • Submission of Sub-Area Plan/Guidelines to City by landowner or developer mentation. • Preliminary staff review End-of-line station with medium density development sur- Open Space Planning Area • Referral to agencies as determined by the Director rounding the site consisting of commercial, office, and retail Open space is an important framework element of the RidgeGate community to create a • Planning Commission public meeting at regular business session, with uses. The station features a 1,300 car garage, RTD local "city in a landscape". This open space system is concentrated to preserve sensitive riparian recommendation to City Council and regional bus connections, and provisions for other and floodplain habitats, create neighborhood edges and to connect Planning Areas with trail Section A: Transition overlay district illustrative cross-section at C-MU#1 • City Council public meeting at regular business session with final action. shuttle services. systems. A majority of the system provides passive recreation opportunities incorporating Subdivision plats and site improvement plans shall be consistent with Sub-Area Plans. regional trail connections and buffers with native landscape character. A Regional Park of Refinements and modifications of Sub-Area Plans would be permitted and considered approximately 65 acres, will be located in close proximity to the greatest concentration of amendments to the Sub-Area Plans, as approved by the City. Lone Tree housing and jobs and will provide opportunities for active recreation uses. Local neighbor- RidgeGate General Intent of PDD Implementation hood park sites will be located by provisions contained in the Sub-Area Plans. Due to the long-term nature of the development, it is possible that the provisions of this A Master Plan for parks, trails and open space for the West Side Property has been com- PDD may not address every subject. The Director shall have the authority to interpret future pleted. Sub-Area Plans and Design Guidelines, and to interpret certain City regulations and stan- The Owner and the City have agreed to seek Inclusion of the East Side Property in to the dards for consistency with the planning concepts and objectives of the PDD, the West Side South Suburban Parks and Recreation District (SSPRD) and in that regard, SSPRD and the Agreement and the Amended and Restated Annexation and Development Agreement with City are developing a master plan for East Side Parks which will provide an initial framework Respect to the East Side Property, the Sub-Area Plans and the Design Guidelines, provided for future implementation by SSPRD. that such interpretations do not conflict with the City of Lone Tree's Comprehensive Plan, as reasonably determined by the Director in consultation with the City Manager.

Section B: Transition overlay district illustrative cross-section at R-MU#9 Revised: 2/20/2018 ProjectDevelopment Information Plan Sheet 3 of 86 Sky Ridge Station Lone Tree, CO

LINCOLN AVE PARK MEADOWS BLVD

INTERSTATE 25

TRAIN STATION CIR

Sky Ridge Station

SKY RIDGE AVE View looking south from Park Meadows Blvd

BELLWERTHER LN BELLWERTHER BISMARK DR BISMARK

RIDGE GATE PKWY

SKY RIDGE MEDICAL CENTER

View looking north from Train station Circle 0 200’ 400’

ENGLEWOOD CITYCENTER REDEVELOPMENT | STATION AREA COMPARISON STUDY | APRIL 2020 13 EXISTING CONDITIONS Belleview Station Denver, CO Existing and Future Land Use Figure 5: Existing Land Uses STATION ZONING T-MU-30: Residential Mixed Use District Currently, most of the land uses in the Belleview study area consist Maximum Allowable Building Height: of office and multi-unit residential (Figure 5). The surrounding area 12 Stories ZONING SURROUNDING STATION consists of residential neighborhoods and commercial development. B-4: General Business District B-8: Intensive General Business/ High Many of the parcels around the Belleview Station area are vacant or Density Residential District S-MX-12: Suburban Mixed Use are in development, with the exception of the new mixed use devel- S-SU-D: Suburban Single Unit Residential OS: Open Space District opment near Belleview Avenue (Figure 6). Blueprint Denver takes a ADOPTED STATION AREA PLAN different approach and categorizes future land uses as “Future Places” Belleview Corridor Multimodal (Figure 8). Much of the study area is categorized as a regional center. Transportation

Blueprint Denver defines a regional center as a “dynamic environment EXISTING CONDITIONS of residential, dining, entertainment and shopping, while incorporating Existing and Future Land Use Figure 5: Existing Land Uses Currently, most of the land uses in the Belleview study area consist a diverse set of employment options.” Additionally, a regional center of office and multi-unit residential (Figure 5). The surrounding area consists of residential neighborhoods and commercial development. Many of the parcels around the Belleview Station area are vacant or should provide multimodal mobility including high capacity transit and are in development, with the exception of the new mixed use devel- opment near Belleview Avenue (Figure 6). Blueprint Denver takes a pedestrian and bicycle movement to, from, and within the area (Blue- different approach and categorizes future land uses as “Future Places” (Figure 8). Much of the study area is categorized as a regional center.

Blueprint Denver defines a regional center as a “dynamic environment Belleview Station print Denver 2019). Figure 6 shows an example of the new mixed use of residential, dining, entertainment and shopping, while incorporating a diverse set of employment options.” Additionally, a regional center development consisting of multi-unit residential and ground floor retail. should provide multimodal mobility including high capacity transit and pedestrian and bicycle movement to, from, and within the area (Blue- print Denver 2019). Figure 6 shows an example of the new mixed use Figure 7 shows the master plan for the area south of Union Avenue. development consisting of multi-unit residential and ground floor retail. Figure 7 shows the master plan for the area south of Union Avenue. The majority of the land in the station area is owned by Front Range The majority of the land in the station area is owned by Front Range Land and Development. Land and Development. Figure 6:LAND Existing Mixed USE Use PLAN Development Figure 7: Master Plan by Front Range Land and Development Figure 6: Existing Mixed Use Development FigureENGLEWOOD 7: CITYCENTER Master REDEVELOPMENT Plan by | STATIONFront AREA Range COMPARISON Land STUDY |and APRIL 2020Development 14

11 City and County of Denver

11 City and County of Denver Belleview Station Denver, CO

E UNION AVE Belleview

Station INTERSTATE 25

LAYTON AVE

View looking south from Union Ave bridge

S NEWPORT ST toward Belleview station S NIAGRA ST

S QUEBEC ST S SYRACUSE CIR S SYRACUSE ST

E BELLVIEW AVE

View looking north on Newport Street at 0 150’ 300’ Belleview intersection

ENGLEWOOD CITYCENTER REDEVELOPMENT | STATION AREA COMPARISON STUDY | APRIL 2020 15 Olde Town Arvada Station Arvada,Olde CO Town Station Area Plan

STATION ZONING OT: Olde Town Zoning District Maximum Allowable Building Height: 20-65’

ZONING SURROUNDING STATION B-2: General Business District R-1: One & Two Family Residential R-L: Residential Low Density R-M: Residential Multifamily I02: Heavy Industrial PUD-BPR: Planned Unit Development (Business Residential District)

ADOPTED STATION AREA PLAN City of Arvada Framework Plan

Building facades can’t exceed two stories; upper stories to be set back. (3 story facade east of McIvoy Park) Commercial/office use on ground floor and office/residential above

Olde Town Station

City of Arvada Framework Plan LAND USE PLAN - ARAVADA TRANSIT STATION FRAMEWORK PLAN 23

ENGLEWOOD CITYCENTER REDEVELOPMENT | STATION AREA COMPARISON STUDY | APRIL 2020 16 Olde Town Arvada Station Arvada, CO

ZEPHYR ST GRANT PL YUKON ST

57TH AVE

GRANDVIEW AVE

Schoolhouse Kitchen - Olde Town Arvada Olde Town Arvada Station

OLDE WADSWORTH BLVD WADSWORTH BYPASS WADSWORTH VANCE ST

55TH AVE

54TH AVE

Watertown Apartment complex near Olde 0 125’ 250’ Town

ENGLEWOOD CITYCENTER REDEVELOPMENT | STATION AREA COMPARISON STUDY | APRIL 2020 17 Central MAX Station Beaverton, OR

G E O G R A P H I C I N F O R M A T I O N S Y S T E M STATION ZONING Beaverton Creek GAGE LN RC-TO: Downtown Regional Center -

Index Map E KAYLYNN LN V Station Community A Transit Oriented District H JAY ST T 8

5 Zoning 1 Maximum Allowable Building Height: Update Effective February 5, 2005 120’

M City of 0130 260 520 780 1,040 1,300 ER L D BeavertonO Feet D R North ZONING SURROUNDING STATION

D OM R1: Urban High Density - Multi Family R5: Urban Standard Density- Single Family MERLO RD R10: Urban Low Density - Single Family

JE NK GC: General Commercial INS RD CS: Community Service District RC-E: Regional Center - East RC-OT: Regional Center - Old Town

M U ADOPTED STATION AREA PLAN R

R

A Y Transit-Oriented Development Strategic

B

L

V

R D

E

T R Plan

D H

T

D

4

R

5

3

1

5

1

TERM

M ILL IKA N W L E G E N DAY

M RESIDENTIAL MULTIPLE USEILL IKA N W R10 Urban Low Density Corridor - Multiple Use C-MU 10,000 sq. ft. - Single Family Station Area - Medium Density SA-MDR ! !! ! R7 Urban Standard Density ! ! ! ! 7,000 sq. ft. - Single Family Station Area - Multiple Use SA-MU R5 Urban Standard Density Station Community - High Density SC-HDR

5,000 sq. ft. - Single Family Station Community - Employment SC-E D V

R4 Urban Medium Density L T Station Community - Multiple Use SC-MU UALA 4,000 sq. ft. - Single Family B TIN VA LL Station Community - Sub Area Y EY HW TUALATIN VALLEY HW R3.5 Urban Medium Density 1 Y Y A

3,500 sq. ft. - Duplex / Multi-Family Town Center - Med. Density Residential TC-MDR R

SH R2 Urban Medium Density Town Center - High Density Residential TC-HDRR A 144TH AVE

W U ST 2,000 sq. ft. - Multi-Family

Town Center - Multiple Use TC-MUM R1 Urban High Density Source Data : 1,000 sq. ft. - Multi-Family Regional Center - Old Town RC-OT !!! City of Beaverton - Regional Center - East RC-E BLAN City Limits - Last UpdatedT onO N2/7/2005S T Regional Center - Transit Oriented RC-TO

L

Zoning - Last Updated on 2/4/2005 E

P METRO Regional Land Information System (RLIS)V - COMMERCIAL

A Street Names - Last Updated on 10/22/2004 D

N H CV Convenience Service Center

2 INTERIM ANNEXATION ZONING T Light Rail Station167TH AVE - Last Updated on 4/26/2004

6

4

1 CS Community Service

Light Rail Line - Last Updated on 4/27/2004 6

1 Washington County - OC Office Commercial Interim Washington County Zoning Washington County Taxlots - Last Updated on 3/07/2005 R

D ROTH DR VINCENT ST NS Neighborhood Service Center Approved Annexations -

D

E (Effective at a later date)

N Disclaimer : V GC General Commercial

I

A

E

This product is for information purposes only and may W

V

H

T

A

not have been prepared for, or be suitable for, legal, T

S

0 E

D engineering, or surveying purposes. Users of this E MISCELLANEOUS

6

V E

R

1

W

A V

information should review, or consult, the primary data3 INDUSTRIAL A FLORENCE ST 6

and information sources to ascertain the usability of the H

1 T

information. This map represents the bestH data available Light Rail Station ¬(Ä 8

T SHELTON ST CI Campus Industrial

E 4

at the time of publication. While reasonable5 effort has

V 1

6 Light Rail Line CT IP Industrial Park

GE A CbeenAMB madeRID to insure the accuracy of the1 information DONNA CT Beaverton City Limits shown on this page, the City of Beaverton assumesR no H LI Light Industrial

E T

L responsibility, or liability for any errors, omissions,T or use 4 E RD P 5 N of this information. Metadata available on request. LUDWIG ST V O H 1 INGT A RM Y T FA

D E 4

SEE ST H GIS/RB 3/08/05 S:\_CDD\_2005\05-0071\BVN_CK_ST_CMTY_Zone_8x11.mxd

V 6 N T

1 PDF Version of this map is Available Online @ T:\MAPS\CDD\BVN_CK_ST_CMTY_Zone_8x11.pdf ZONING PLAN - BEAVERTON CREEK STATION COMMUNITY PLAN Beaverton Creek Station Community Community Plan 10 ENGLEWOOD CITYCENTER REDEVELOPMENT | STATION AREA COMPARISON STUDY | APRIL 2020 18 Central MAX Station Beaverton, OR

SW CENTER ST

BEAVERTON CREEK

SW LOMBARD ST

Central MAX Beaverton Station SW CEDAR HILLS BLVD View looking west from SW Hall Blvd near the SW HALL BLVD station - The Round

WATSON AVE

SW CANYON RD

View looking northwest on Watson Ave 0 150’ 300’

ENGLEWOOD CITYCENTER REDEVELOPMENT | STATION AREA COMPARISON STUDY | APRIL 2020 19